GEOTECH SITE ASSESSMENT · very soft soft firm stiff very stiff hard c) Method of Determination of...
37
t"-x ^*- •.-; MERLEX ENGINEERING LTD., Consulting Geotechnical Engineers
Transcript of GEOTECH SITE ASSESSMENT · very soft soft firm stiff very stiff hard c) Method of Determination of...
t"-x^*- •.-;
MERLEX ENGINEERING LTD.,Consulting Geotechnical Engineers
MERLEX ENGINEERING LTD.' '
Reference No. 93/01/3000 MI111 *,______-31L10SWD002 63.6357 ANTOME Q.|Q
February 1S,.:1993
R.M. Blais ft Associates P.O. Box 237 .Pinewood Park Drive North Bay, Ontario P1B 8H2
Attention: Mr. R. M. Blais. P. Eng.
Re: Geotechnical Site Assessment
Kyanite Project .
Dear Sir:
As per your verbal authorization, we have carried out a site visit and
report on the factual data along with our comoents in this brief letter
report.
. .* f
On the oorning of January 25, 1993, the site was visited by a senior aeaber
of.our engineering staff to review the ground conditions at three testpits
put down during our attendance on site. Following this work, an additional
seven testpits (Testpits 4 to 10, inclusive) were put down by the client
and brief logs supplied to the undersigned.
The location of all testpits are shown on the enclosed Testpit Plan
supplied by the client. Elevations at the testpit locations were
interpolated from the topography data available on this plan.
120 PROGRESS COURT * P.O. BOX 886 * NORTH BAY. ONTARIO. PI B 8K1 * TEL: (705) 476-2560 . FAX: (705) 4764882
!ef. Ho. 93/01/3000 -2- Date: February 15, 1993
SOIL CONDITIONS
* Detailed descriptions of the soils encountered a t'Testpits l to 3 are shown .-j
on the enclosed Testpit Data Sheets. A general description (supplied by
the client) of the soils encountered at Testpits 4 to 10 are also included
on this logs. At all testpit locations, an organic cover consisting 'i
x predoninantly of a fibrous sandy black organics (with roots, leaves and*
*. other forest cover) was encountered at the testpits. This deposit ranged
in thickness fro* l to greater than 7 feet (at the location of Testpit 9)
but generally was in the order of 2 to 3 feet thick.
Directly underlying this organic cover, soils were predominantly granular
consisting of sands with varying amounts of silts and gravels. It was
noted that at the location of Testpit l a sand and gravel was encountered
, at the interface with the bedrock. Refusal to further penetration of the* ^^
. - " backhoe (bedrock) was encountered at Testpits l, 2, 7, 8 and 10 at depths
ranging between 5 to 13 feet below grade (elevation 1029.0 to 1021.0). At
tile other testpit locations, either bedrock was not encountered, to the
depth at which the backhoe could excavate (i.e. approximately 15 foot
depth) or to the depth where rapid cave in of the granular soils prevented
further advance.
*
COMMENTS
Testpits put down under our direction encountered surface water inflow
which created difficulties in maintaining the testpits open and advancing
to the full capability of -the backhoe. Establishing an accurate
groundwater level was difficult, however, at this time of year it is
anticipated to be close to existing grade.
Ref. Ho. 93/01/3000 -3- Date: February 15, 1993
The results of this investigation indicate that underlying the organic
deposits* soils are predominantly granular in nature and saturated at the
tine of this investigation. These materials can probably be successfully
excavated using a dragline operation to the depth at which bedrock was
encountered.
We trust that the factual data contained in this report and brief comments
a/e sufficient for your present requirements. We look forward to serving
you further on this project as your future requirements develop. Please do
not hesitate to contact the undersigned.
Yours very truly,
HERLEZ ENGINEERING LTD.
M. A. Merleau, P. Eng.
HAM/cl
End.
.ef. No. 93/01/3000 TESTPIT DATA SHEETS Page l of 2
Testpit No. l Grade 1034.0
O - 1.5' SANDY ORGANICs - black 1.5 - 3.0 Fine and medium SAND - coarse layer at bedrock surface
(see Grainsize No. 1)3.0 BEDROCK - sloping to 5' depth at north end of testpit
End of Testpit
Testpit No. 2 Grade 1034.0
. O - 1.0* SANDY ORGANICS - black 1.0 - 13.0 FINE SANDS - some silt, gravel, cobble and occasional
boulder, wet below 3* 13.0 BEDROCK
End of Testpit
Testpit No. 3 Grade 1035.0
O - 1.0' SANDY ORGANICS - black 1.0 - 10.0 Fine and medium SANDS - some silt, gravel and occasional
cobble 10.0 End of Testpit due to rapid cave-in
Testpit No. 4 Grade 1035.4
O - 2.0' SANDY ORGANICS - black 2.0 - 15.0 SANDS - medium and fine sands, trace of silt
(see Grainsize No. 2) 15.0 End of Testpit - No Refusal
Testpit No. 5 Grade 1038.0
0-2.0' SANDY ORGANICS - black 2.0 - 15.0 SANDS - brown sands with gravel some silt
(see Grainsize No. 3) 15.0 End of Testpit - No Refusal
Testpit No. 6 Grade 1034.8
O - 3.0' SANDY ORGANICS - black3.0 -11.0 SANDS
11.0 End of Testpit - No Refusal
ef. No. 93/01/3000 TESTPIT DATA SHEETS Page 2 of 2
Testpit No. 7 Grade 1033.7
0-2.0' SANDY ORGANICS - black 2.0 - 8.0 SANDS
8.0 BEDROCKEnd of Testpit
Testpit No. 8 Grade 1036.3
O - 3.0' SANDY ORGANICS - black 3.0 -*9.0 SANDS
9.0 BEDROCKEnd of Testpit
^
Testpit No. 9 Grade 1036.0
O - 7.0* ORGANICS - black7.0 - 12.0 SAND ft SILT (see Grainsize No. A)
12.0 End of Testpit - No Refusal
Testpit No. 10 Grade 1039.0
O - 4.0' ORGANICS - black 4.0 - 8.0 SANDS
8.0 BEDROCKEnd of Testpit
rLIST OF ABBREmTlOHS * DESOmTIOH OF TERMS
The abbreviations and tens commonly employed on the borehole logs, figures and la the report ara aa follows:
on the
1. SAMPLE TTPES
AS Auger SamplesCS Chunk SampleDO Drive OpenDS Denison Type SampleFS Foil SamplePH Sampler advanced by
hydraulic pressure PH Soapier advanced by
manual pressure BC Rock Core with Size and
Percentage of Recovery ST Slotted Tube TO Thin-walled. Open TP Thin-walled. Piston WU Sampler advanced by
static weight US Wash Sample
2. PENETRATION RESISTANCE/"!!''
Dynamic COM Penetration Resistance:
A continuous profile showing the number of blows for each foot of penetration of a 2" diameter 900 point cone driven by a 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches. Plotted aa e a e *
Standard Penetration Resistance or "N" Value:
The number of blowa of a 140 pound falling 30 Inches required to sdvance a 2 inch O.D. drive open sampler one foot into undisturbed soil. Plotted as "O*
3. SOIL DESCRIPTION
a) Cohesionless Soils:
"M" (blows/ft) Relative Density
O to 44 to 1010 to 3030 to 50over 50
b) Cohesive Soils:
tlndrslned Shear Strength k.e.f.
Less than 0.25 0.25 to 0.50 0.50 to 1.0 1.0 to 2.0 2.0 to 4.0 over 4.0
very la loose compact dense very dense
Consistency
very softsoftfirmstiffvery stiffhard
c) Method of Determination of Undrained Shear Strength of Cohesive Soils:
*3.2 - Field vane test in borehole.
The number denotea the sensitivity to remoulding.
A- Laboratory Vane Test
Q- Compression test in laboratory.
For a saturated cohesive soil the undralned shear strength Is taken as one-half of the undralned compressive strength.
4. TERH1MOLOCT
Terminology used for describing soil strsta Is based on the proportion of individual particle slses present!
Trace, or occasional Less than 10ZSome lOto 20ZWith 20 to 30ZAdjective (e.g. silty or sandy) M to 40ZAnd (e.g. sand and gravel) 40 to 60S
5. LABORATORY TESTS
P - Standard Proctor Test A - Atterberg Limit Test
GS-- taralirSlie WstrlWtioa- H - Hydrometer Analysis C - Consolidation Test
MERLEX ENGINEERING LTD.
ENC
LOSU
RE
fc.
TESTPIT
LOCA
TION
PLA
NKyanite
Proj
ect
- Butler/Antoine
MER
LEX
EN
GIN
EE
RIN
G L
TD.
CO
MW
niM
OIO
ttC
MM
CM
IM
Wf f
M
't
100
90 ao TO
QI 6
0
i
SO
fi 40
1 3
0
20 10 0
——
——
——
——
——
——
——
——
—
s
\ "
' ' ' '
GRAI
N SI
ZE D
ISTR
iajJT
ION
\ '
\ v'
0 R
A V
E L
CO
AR
SE
F
INE
fZfe
V
IV
fV
V
H
T s\ \
1
\ Ss \\ \
1
k
*v \\
1 1
1
\\,
100
10
PHOJ
ECTi
Kya
nite
Pro
ject
LOCA
TIO
N'
Bu
tle
r -
Anto
ine
BOR
EHO
LE
N* -
SAM
PLE
N*'
DE
PTH*
EL
EVAT
ION
.
HC
OAR
SE
1 M
EDA
ND
JM
l F
INE
OUR
LT ft
CLA
Y
l*rifD
t0
*-
BB
RB
CM
rt
V
3W
TB
nC
JV
W
p —
CLAs
smam
aN
STS00
0
irm
I^H
W*
4 8
10
16
20
30 4
O
SO 6
0 KX
) M
O
200
US.
ST
ANDA
RD
S lev
* SI
ZES
J a N^
B s
^ s*5— -^
l
— —
--^
~T-
iTP
1
^
1
COEF
FtCi
ENT
OF
COEF
FICI
ENT
OF
ClaM
iftao
f*O
NTA
RIO
1
1011
5— — ,i— "x -^
1"—
i •~.—
- * x — .
\
\ tx.
•^-^
.
i i
\ \\ \
\^
" ' .
-* —
— --
T \ >
Gram
Ste
In M
llllm
efcr
v '
UN
FDR
MTT
Yi
CU
RM
OU
RC
'
30
Of
SO
I
PRO
VING
!*1
stlL
txjT
npta
and
Gr
oup
Sym
bols
di
STAN
DAR
D S
PE
CIF
ICA
TIO
N
SUBG
RAD
E M
ATE
RIA
L
a
.001
PLAS
TIC
PR
OPC
HTES
UO
UO
U
MIT
%
'
PLA
STC
LMC
T ^
* P
LAS
DC
mr
K3E
X %
*
MO
ISTU
RE
CONT
ENT
%
"i
MER
LEX
EN
GIN
EE
RIN
G L
TD.
* *
100
•0 so TO
9 6
0
f
90
|
SO to 10 0 —
——
——
——
——
——
——
——
——
——
——
——
—
t S
A.
. X
\
s ,. '^
,
" ''\-
G
RAJN
'.SIZ
E bl
S
1 G
RAVE
L|
CO
AR
SE
S1 r V4 \
lZ i \
FINE
"X,.;"
.;
,
k Vfi*
CO
ARSE
ueoii
y i
PINE
' *
" l1
V
V V
4
B 10
M
20
SO
40
9060
10
0 14
0
S s s s s \\
ss
s
100
10
PROJ
ECT!
K
yani
te P
roje
ct
LOCA
TION
' Bu
tler
- A
ntoi
ne
BORE
HOLE
N*
' SA
MPL
E N
*i
DEPT
H-
ELEV
ATIO
N i
-*s^
— 'N
TP
4
^,
1
COEF
FICI
ENT
OF
COEF
FICI
ENT
OF
V ^N ^
^ *.V
i \ •*
Grain
UMFC
RM
CURN
ATiN S **^ "**
,
Sb m JN
\\ I\
"\ **,
\ 1
— —
— ,\ \ *, \ \
k
\*
- .
* h
Milli
met
er*
' ft
E-
'u. v
vT
**
' b
*
- SI
LT m
CLA
Y Mf*
OUR
D
ML
MM
tW|
x 7
CLA
SM
nC•T
ION
ST
S1
000
TH
200
Ut.
STA
ND
AR
D
SIC
VC
S
IZD
T m
H•M
^P^
Clas
slfico
tton
of S
amp*
and
Gr
oup
Sym
bol t
ON
TAR
IO P
RO
VIN
CIA
L ST
AND
ARD
SP
EC
IFIC
ATI
ON
S
1010
GR
ANU
LAR
"B
" TY
PE
I
ja
.001
PLAS
TB
PRO
PERT
CS
UO
UO
LI
MIT
%
*
PLA
SnC
LSM
T ^ '
pLAs
ncm
r SC
EX
* -
MO
ISTU
RE
CONT
ENT
% '
i to
MER
LEX
ENG
INEE
RIN
G L
TD.
o ! o lO iro
wt3 i
o
S K
.i
f
;. ^
u .^ r
an .5*
tiJ *i* -j ^
—
-
-
^
"^ ^—
fc*-^"
0 0 0 Ot
JS•"
oa
;
fx
X4 —— . —— . ———
xx
Xx
x
o o o o
fiU|9SOd |l
JJs
/|7
X
-
— - . .. — . ^-.. .O 0 O C W N —
naiad
100 10
PROJECT. Kyanite Project LOCATION. Butler - Antoine
BOREHOLE N* ' SAMPLE M*.DEPTH-
ELEVATION '
ENCLOSURE Mi.
SI
- g o
ozGC Ul UlZozLUXLJU
CE LU
100
•0 so TO
9 S
O
9
80
S 40
f
mn
CO 10 0 —
——
——
——
——
——
——
——
——
——
——
——
i *
' *
"4RA
JN S
IZE
DIST
RBUn
ON
* \
' ' 'J
A
1 C
OA
RS
E
1 F
INE
(C
OAR
SE
1 M
ED
IUM
1
FIN
Es-
ztkz-
AT
r V
Iff
S*
4 s
10
is 20
MO
10
PROJ
ECT-
K
yanite
Pro
ject
LO
CATI
ON i
Butler
- A
ntoi
ne
BORE
HOLE
N*i
SA
MPL
E N
*'
DEPT
H*
ELEV
ATIO
N i
i
1
COEF
FICI
ENT
OF
COEF
FICI
ENT
OF
ai^
K) H40 ^F
WI^B
^
1
SILT
S)
C
LAY
IW
*
\ i
OUM
Hs
^PER
^l^lC
s? ^s
P tj*m
* w
.'"^
™
WD
10
1.
CLA
SW
riCA
TlO
N
SY
tlJOQ.
rtH
H^W
56
0
KX
) M
O
20
0
Ut.
S
TAN
DA
RD
S
lfV
t S
IZn
P 9
i i
A
Grain
Ste
m M
llllm
rtw*
'
OM
MV
TUIC
'
!r l
CloM
lftaon
on o
f Son
npw
oftd
Gro
up S
ymbo
ls
PLAS
TIC
PRO
PERT
CS
UO
UO
LI
MIT
%
'
PLA
Snc
UM
T
*
* PL
ASnC
fTY
SOEX
%
*
MO
ISTU
RE C
ONT
ENT
%
*1
MER
LEX
ENG
INEE
RIN
G L
TD.
IS
\. l 1/4 d .
V. P4
A.(*2-
^"-40
\\
o) vn0\
to
vn
\
\
(A i i
iiid
S
"O
fr
i/i R ri! e T)
IA
.^cff t
*Jl r
O
BU
TL
BG
•^^
Q
t
3!
/s
MERLEX ENGINEERING LTD.CONSULTING GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS
*
INVOICEftef. No. 93/01/3000 Inv. MD. 93-OOB February 26, 1993
R. M. Blais d Associates P.O. Box 237 Pinewood Park Drive Nbrth Bay, Ontario P1B BH2
Attention; Mr. R. M. Blais. P. Enq.
f For professional services rendered in connection with the geotechnical site assessment for Butler/Antoine Kyanite Project, Antoine Township. OUR G.S.T. R1O3642344
ENGINEERING:
a. Senior Engineer - involved in sitevisit and testpit excavation, meetings,and preparation of report.8.O hr at * llO.OO/hr * 88O.OO
b. Mileage - senior engineer's travel to and from site. 16O.O km at * 0.30/km 48.OO
* 928.00
LABORATORY TESTING PROGRAM:
a. Grain Size Analysis4 at * 55.00 each 22O.OO
b. Natural Moisture Contents4 at * 4.50 each 18.0O
238.00
* 1,166.00
G.S.T. 81.62
TOTAL ATONT OF INVOICE * 1,247.62
Terms: Invoices are due when rendered. 4 Interest is charged at Z/, per month after. 3O days.
120 PROGRESS COURT * P.O. BOX 885 * NORTH BAY. ONTARIO. PI B 8K1 * TEL: (705) 476-2550 * FAX: (70S) 47641882
Blais ft Associates Umited Civil and Mining Engineers
PINEWOOD PARK DRIVE P.O. BOX 237
NORTH BAY. ONTARIO P1B8H2
Office: 705-474-4110 Home: 705-474-4793
July 21, 1992
Kyanite Mining CorporationP.O. Box 486Dillwyn, Virginia, U.S.A.23936
RE: INVOICE JULY 1992BUTLER - ANTOINE KYANITE PROJECT ASSESSMENT WORK - Province of Ontario
COMSULTTMC-gTBT.P SUPERVISION R.M. Blais, P.Eng. June 10/92 - June 30/92
10 days e $350.00
Supply driller-operator - Dave Lott
11 days @ 150.00
GST 7%
$3,500.00
1.650.00$5,150.00
360.50
$5,510.50
R.M. Blais 6 Assoc. Ltd.
Truck 4x4 Chev-10 days @ $50.00 $ 500.00Chainsaw - 11 days @ S20.00 220.00Drill bits 6 drill steel 300.00
$1,020.00 GST 7% 71.40
$1,091.40 $1,091.40
- 2 -
Bay Blasting Ltd.Powder and capsRental lead wires, blastingMachine b Meter $l,119.19 $l,ll9.19
North Bay Rent-All185 CFM Compressor150 feet hose, oiler2 Jack Hammer 419.75 419.75
$8 / 140.84
BelatechINDUSTRIES LTD.
EXPLORATION t MIMES DIVISION
1364 FrankHn StnMtNorth Bay, Ontario
P1B2M3Phone: BIN: 4744077 or R*K 4724790
INVOICE
Date:
To:*
RE:
July 28, 1992
R.M. Blab A Associates Ltd. Box 237, North Bay, Ontario P1B8H2
STRIPPING, DRILLING A BLASTING OPERATIONS KYANITE PROPERTY
June 11/92
June 15/92
June 16/92
June 17/92
June 18/92
MOB TO SITE Roads to Pit #1 - stripping Backhoe 10 hrs @ 530.00 Operator 10 hrs @ 517.00 Service Track
Move Compressor to site Stripping/Drilling Backhoe 10 hrs @ 530.00 Operator 10 hrs @ 517.00 Service Track
Stripping/Drilling Backhoe 11 hrs @ 530.00 Operator 11 hrs @ Si 7.00Service Truck
DrillingBackhoe H [email protected] Operator 11 hrs @ Si 7.00 Service Track
DrillingBackhoe 10 hrs @ 530.00 Operator 10 hrs @ 517.00 Service Track
5300.00170.0050.00
5520.00
5300.00170.0050.00
520.00
330.00187.0050.00
567.00
330.00187.0050.00
567.00
.5300.00170.0050.00
5520.00
520.00
567.00
567.00
520.00 520.00
June 19/92
June 20/92
7une 22/92
June 23/92
June 24/92
June 25/92
EXPENSES
Test Pits tailings Area Backhoe 10 hrs @ (30.00 Operator 10 hrs @ S17.00 Service Track
Test Pits - tailings area Backhoe 8 hn @ 530.00 Operator 8 hn @ SI 7.00 Service Track
Drilling - Start blasting Backhoe H [email protected] Operator 11 hrs @ (17.00 Service Track
Loading/Blasting Backhoe 5 hn @ (30.00 Blaster 10 hrs @ (17.00 Service Track
Loading - Blasting Backhoe 4 hn @ (30.00 Blaster l hn @ (17.00 Service Track
Finish Blasting Load 45 gallon drums Haul to Yard Backhoe 6 hrs @ (30.00 Blaster 8 hrs @ (17.00 Service Track
(300.00170.0050.00
520.00
(240.00136.0050.00
426.00
330.00187.0050.00
567.00
150.00170.0050.00
370.00
120.00136.0050.00
306.00
(180.00136.0050.00
366.00
Sub-Total of Time ft Equipment
Fuel - Backhoe ft Service Track Meal- 11 days (10.00 Float Charges - 45 gallon drums Float Charges - Backhoe / Mobilize Float Charges - Backhoe / Demobilize
(361.55 110.00 150.00 192.60 192.60
520.00
426.00
567.00
370.00
306.00
366.00
(5.249.00
Sub - total of Expenses (1,006.75
INVOICE SUMMARY
FEES FOR LABOUR A EQUIPMENT TO GAT. applicable
Total Fees
EXPENSES AS LISTED ABOVE 7* G.S.T. applicable
* *
Total Expenses
55,249.00367.43
S5.616.43
J l,006.75 70.47
51.077.22
J5.616.43
Sl.077.22
TOTAL INVOICE DUE t6.693.6S
' Respectfully
BB/lf
GEORGE'S SSSSSS&EQUIBMENT RENTAL 6 EXCAVATING
' . R.R. 81. ^CALLANDER. ONTARIO POH IHO
(705)474-1959
-*
CONSTRUCTION . fi. LF- QINQ LTD.
P.O. BOX 1153NORTH BAY. ONTARIO RIB 8K4 TELEPHONE (70S) 47*2513 FACSMLE (70S) 47*2286
INVOICE
NO. 06563
rBelatech Petroleum Products 1354 Franklin Street North Bay, Ontario P1B 2M3
MVOCEOME
January 2 2. 1993OURORDBtMX
YOUR ORDER MX
On Receipt
G. ChadbournPPO.( B COL
To invoice for equipment rental without operator ' bill 09519:
16 hours 4 hours
G.S.T.
TOTAL DUE THIS INVOICE
30.0065.00
5480.00260.00
5740.0051.80
$791.80
G.S.T.ffl100672880
•'•?.- v
BBUMAN LEASING LTD.uttuoetrruL nwcrmi seimce
• SOD •BUCKS
P.O. BOX 1153'NORTH BAY. ONTARIO RIB 8K4
PHONE: (705) 476-2513
FOB TELEPHONE. HYDRO AND OA* UNES
- 09519
T/fo/y *y. ^
101112l PI l
•o wu
6ELATECHPETROLEUM PRODUCTS
k 1364 FRANKLIN STREET NORTH BAY, ONTARIO. Pi B 2M3
BUS: (706) 494-9660 * FAX: (705) 484-0662TEXACO
Ouali:y Lobdcanib
INVOICE
1164
SOLD TO: ^~
w* 'li) f*
Amount — Code No.,
ChoquoKo..6*2-
DATE SHHfEDVIA PROV. SALES TAX UC. NO. YOUR ORDER NO. TERMS
QUANTITY DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
r
W
G.S.T. f 123448100
TERMS: NET 30 DAYS UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED. CARRYING CHARGES AT 2* PER MONTH WILL BE CHARGED ON ALL OVERDUE ACCOUNTS. MINIMUM INTEREST CHARGE OF 96.00 PER MONTH.
(A DJV. OF BELATECH INDUSTRIES LTD.)
SUBTOTAL
G.S.T.
P.S.T.
TOTAL
Ministry ofNorthern Development
1 MinesOntario
Report of Work Conducted After Recording Claim -
Mining Act
Transaction Number
. OOPPersonal information collected on this form is obtained under the authority of the Mining Act. This information win be used for correspondence. Questions about this collection should be directed to the Provincial (Manager. Mining Lands. Ministry of Northern Development and Mines, Fourth Floor. 159 Cedar Street, Sudbury. Ontario. P3E 6A5. telephone (705) 670-7264.
Instructions: - Please type or print and submit in dupli- Refer to the Mining Act and Regulation;
Recorder.- A separate copy of this form must be cc 57o —- Technical reports and maps must accompany this form in duplicate. 300- A sketch, showing the claims the work is assigned to. must accompany this form.
983 - - •4-74—<tJ/o
Work Performed (Check One Work Group Only)
Physical Work. Including Drilling
Rehabilitation RECORDED
Other Authorized Work •N 18 ONLY OCT141993Assays
Assignment from Reserve
Total Assessment Work Claimed on the Attached Statement of CostsNote: The Minister may reject for assessment work credit all or part of the assessment work submitted if the recorded
holder cannot verify expenditures claimed in the statement of costs within 30 days of a request for verification.
Persons and Survey Company Who Performed the Work (Give Name and Address of Author of Report)
(attach a schedule H necessary)
Certification of Beneficial Interest * See Note No. 1 on reverse sidel certify that at the time the work was performed, the claims covered in this work report were recorded in the current holder's name or held under a beneficial interest by the current recorded holder.
Recorded Hofctocor Agent (Signature)
Certification of Work Reportcertify that l have a personal knowledge of the facts set forth in this Work report, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after
Ms completion and annexed report is true.Natnt and Address of PBfson cjennymo
T'O-
Ifoo PiKjeuJtco
For Office Use OnlyTotal Value Cr. Recorded Date Recorded
RECEIVEDDeemeo Approval Date
ar\, \ ®
(XM1 (O3W1)
1
Jlli
iif !
|!P
if1
i1
ri IPu)Co
^
tAVXJ^ VA)-G
5
V\
05IR—j
v\
8li!6
.^
r{vn -jw *p-
^AV)J^ O-4 (T*
^^^
\jjtri
SuJ-0
^
^03N UJ-O
Si
y\UOt1G^ e
^i**
(Ai
**M|l!iis ?f
IIIf*iCO WIr* 2.3S3 1
efi ^
0 lV
00*iJT
\.^O0
Vftfr
1.^ *
V^ 0o
io •^VK)
*
CX) OJ-^
, f' r
•^.00 u) ^
.
d(^ s^4N
-. . -,i~
^.foUJ^
oauo*
\TOK
g S*sff*
P
Qo|5
sil*
*00
ZM
^^
KCP
l \ 34
VP
V.
CXiv^^
UJV**-f^U3 ^ ^vA
N
1^\ ^l^
'k)
•^OoVXJ^
•*v.
OB\jj -^
"V.
C*vw-k
W*OgoS-— * * 3 S.
iff•io?&Z*9
Credits you are claiming in this report may be cut back. In order to minimize the adverse effects of such deletions, please indicate from which claims you wish to priorize the deletion of credits. Please mark (^) one of the following:
1. D Credits are to be cut back starting with the claim listed last, working backwards.2. D Credits are to be cut back equally over all claims contained in this report of work.3. D Credits are to be cut back as priorized on the attached appendix.
In the event that you have not specified your choice of priority, option one will be implemented.
Note 1: Examples of benefldal interest are unrecorded transfers, option agreements, memorandum of agreements, etc., with respect to the mining claims.
Note 2: H work has been performed on patented or leased land, please complete the following:
l certify that the recorded holder had a beneficial interest in the patented or leased land at the time the work was performed.
Signature
-A-J-j0)
O CD^
SP
O
crCP
oCO
0 CO Pin00
O00
N
CO
So
o
tV1
rt1J b
8
J3
b0
wO6"0
-
(T
8ft
ii
88
*
~* '
88
1
*
fO O
Oo so0.
oc
T0 0,
0
.-
1oc
S0.
00
8oC
o"
q00
olHffi 2'
fill
If
3r
N)v
ofill
Credits you are claiming in this report may be cut back. In order to minimize the adverse effects of such deletions, please indicate from which claims you wish to priorize the deletion of credits. Please mark (s) one of the following:1. D Credits are to be cut back starting with the claim listed last, working backwards.2. D Credits are to be cut back equally over all claims contained in this report of work.3. D Credits are to be cut back as priorized on the attached appendix.
In the event that you have not specified your choice of priority, option one will be implemented.
Note 1: Examples of benefldal Interest are unrecorded transfers, option agreements, memorandum of agreements, etc., with respect to the mining claims.
Note 2: If work has been performed on patented or leased land, please complete the following:
l certify that the recorded holder had a beneficial interest in the patented or leased land at the time the work was performed
Signature Date
Ontario
Ministry ofNorthern Development--4 Mines
Ministere du Developpement du Nord et des mines
Statement of Costs for Assessment Creditttat des coQts aux fins du credit devaluation
Mining Act/Loi sur les mines
Transaction No./N* de transaction
Personal information collected on this form is obtained under the authority of the Mining Act. This information will be used to maintain a record and ongoing status of the mining daim(s). Questions about this collection should be directed to the Provincial Manager. Minings Lands. Ministry of Northern Development and Mines. 4th Floor. 159 Cedar Street. Sudbury. Ontario P3E 6A5. telephone (705) 670-7264.
Les renseignements personnels contemn dans la presente formule sort recueiWs en vertu de la Lot sur le* mines et serviront a tenir a jour un registre des concessions mrnieres. Adresser toute quesiton sur la coHece de ces renseignements au chef provincial des terrains miniers. ministere du Developpement du Nord et des Mines. 159. rue Cedar. 4e etaga. Sudbury (Ontario) P3E 6A5. telephone (705) 670-7264.
1. Direct Costs/CoOts directs
Type
WagesSalalres
Contractor's and Consultant's Fee* Drolls da ['entrepreneur et d* I'expert-
SuppSas Used) FownttunM
Equipment••i——*—*fwnm Location d*
Description
Labour Main-d'oeuvreField Supervision Supervision sur le terrain
Type
Type PowcMEe,GOP5
Type
Amount Montant
4-,-lDl,
4,854
SS4D-™4241-^(SIMS
Total Direct Costs Total des couts directs
Totals Total global
23/375
2. Indirect Costs/CoOts Indlrects* * Note: When claiming Rehabilitation work Indirect costs are not
allowable as assessment work. Pour le remboursement des travaux de rehabilitation, les couts indirects ne sont pas admissiWes en tant que travaux d'evaluation.
Type
Transportation Transport
Food and LodgingNourrMureethttwrgement .Mobinzatlon and
HpbmMtton et
Description
Type
Amount Montant
Sub Total of Indirect Costs Total partM des coots Indirects
Amount ABowabta (not greater than 20* of Direct Costs) Montant admissible (n'excedant pas 20 H des couts directs)Total Valus of Assessment Cradi Vatour totals du cnWN (Total of Db*ct and AtowaM* d'evshiatlonktdraet CMtel (ToM dM eodte dracta
Totals Total global
53^535-
Ale**
24,oto•lin
Note: The recorded holder will be required to verify expenditures claimed in this statement of costs within 30 days of a request for verification. If verification is not made, the Minister may reject for assessment work all or part of the assessment work submitted.
Note: Le titutaire enregistre sera tenu de verifier les depenses dernandees dans le present etat des couts dans les 30 jours suivant une demande a cet effet. Si la verification n'est pas eftectuee. le ministre peut rejeter tout ou une partie des travaux d'evaluation presentes.
FlUng Discounts Remises pour depot
1. Work filed within two years of completion is claimed at 1OXWb of the above Total Value of Assessment Credit.
1. Les travaux deposes dans les deux arts suivant tour achevement sort rembourses a 100 Sfc de la vateur Male susmentionnee du a*# devaluation.
2. Work filed three, four or five years atter completion is claimed at SOto of the above Total Value of Assessment Credit See calculations below:
Total Value of Assessment Credit Total Assessment Claimedx 0.50 -
2. Les travaux deposes trois. quatre ou cinq arts apres tour achevement sont rembourses a 50 46 de la vateur totale du credit d'evaluation susmentionne. Voir tes calaite ckJessous.
Vateur totale du ere* devaluationx 0.50 -
Evaluation totale demandee
Certification Verifying Statement of Costs Attestation de I'etat des coots
l hereby certify:that the amounts shown are as accurate as possible and these costs were incurred while conducting assessment work on the lands shown on the accompanying Report of Work form.
J'atteste par la presente:quo les montants indiques sont le plus exact possible et que ces depenses cot ete engagees pour effectuer les travaux d'evaluation sur les terrains indiques dans la formule de rapport de travail ci-joint.
that(Recorded Holder. Agent, l
to make this certification
i in Company)l am authorized Et qu'a tilre deH mm uv _________________ ie suis autorise
(mu4aire •nregnM. repreMrtant. poste occupe dans la compegnie)
a faire cette attestation.
0?12 (OV91I
:- '//74Nota : Dans cette lormufe. kxsqu'M design* des personnes. le masculin est utilise au sens neutre.
IIIIIIIIMUI1UUTOWNSHIPS. BA3t LINES. ETC.
IBBV TWRWell reftt****
LOTS. MINING CUAIMS. PARCELS. ETC UNSURVEYED'LIMQS - - --
LOT LINESPARCEL BOUNOAfiYMINING CLAIMS,iTC
RAILWAY AND RlfBMT OF WAY UTILITY LINES
1 NON-PERENNIALFLOODING OR FLOODING RIGHTSSUBDIVISION OR (COMPOSITE PLANRESERVATIONSORIGINAL SHOREL-rtlEMARSH OR MUSKBE tZ3T^MINES '.TRAVERSE MONUMENT
*t••l******** *'••••If(MMBridflO
. 0*llr**4
•ulMi*t.
II**•M* ••lli*u roll*Cliff, PI t, PI l c
Coatoart
4*****l****
li** ri***•M
•^•idbr *Rotorvolr L JJ Rivor, ttroom.Coool
DISPOSmON OF CROWN LANDSControl Point!tf*rt***t*l
V*MI**I
Cuivort Poll*
IK* ri**'
- -S."^V-
Mr**tiM *l II**
KochW**ill***l i MtOOl s**
OF DOCUMIENTPATENT. SURFACK tr MINING RIGHTS
" .SURFACE EIGHTS ONLY . MINING WIGHTS ONLY —
LEASE. SURFACE * MINING RIGHTS" . SURFACE WIGHTS ONLY__——~. " , MINING RlfDHTS ONLY
LICENCE OF occummoN
Soot novation|l*k* *l***M***t
Fonco,Notf9*i Moll
Jowor WonvmlMlon Lino
Floodod Land teckNorth or Swamp *^* Mott Ir Mlno Hood Promo m Outcrop cC^v
ORDfR-IN COUNCIL ......__...........™._....—. OCRESERVATION CANCELLED
Utility Polo* WMrf , Oook, Pior W*odod Arco SAND ft GRAVEL.
NOT!: MININO MIOHW IN PARCCLt *AT|NTCO PfHOM TO MAY O.101 a virrvr M* OWIOINAL PATCNTM ov THOLAMOO ACT mJl e 1070. CHAP MO, 0*C 03. OUMIC 1
AREAS WITHDRAWN FROM DISPOSITION
M.R.O. - MINING RIGHTS ONLYI.RX). - SURFACE RIGHTS ONLYM.+ S. - MINING AND SURFACE RIGHTS
SCALE 1:20 000
SAND AND 8RAVEL
OMAVKL .*—-*—
MTC OBAV*VWT4C-ll
M.T.O. OMVfU fit 4C-00
l^-r-X U
THE IHFOHMoi THAT APPEARS ON TftfjB MAP HAS BEEN COMPILED FROM VAPVOUSAMD ACCUfUCT JB NOT GUARANTEES THOSE VMSHING TO MG CLAIMS SHOULD CON SULT WITH THE QJBMItlG RECORDER. MBOIKIWY OF NORTHERN VEVELOP
Ci for \La*t
DISTRICTADMIKUBTBATIVf
SUDBURYUNO TITUS.
NIP1SSIN6QIVISION
MTuiiatiyot
T 56639S 323928
J STORAGE X AREA
S 323928S 345818
T 56638S 323927 MILL AREA
NFW 36' 0 CULVERT-S 323927S 345817
TAILINGS POND
CAPACITY 700,000 f1 J
CROCAN
W/LCRUSHING PLANT
( PORTABL
NEW 24' 0 r.iP-
PUMPHOUSE
T 56638S323927
S 323927 xS3458I7
T 56637S 323926
PONDvif/l 1021'
NFW 20 0CIP-
S 323926S 345816
"T
NOTESSEE DWG 07 96 ft DWG ()8 93
2 SPILLWAY - SFE DWG 08-93
o o o
o8
*l SOO N ——
21 000 N --
?O t)OO N
SITE PLANSHOWING
MINE AND MILL SITE TAILINGS POND AREA
BUTLER\ ANTOINE KYANITE PROJECT
TOWNSHIPS Oh ANTOINE a BUTLER
SUDBURY MINING DIVISION PROVINCE OF ONTARIO
FOR
KYANITE MINING CORPORATION
oo o
DRAWN
T~M BLAIS ft ASSOCIATES^LTD - Norlh Bay . Ontario~rT7otf~f!5' Tfe'^rT7 '' TDWG. oi-9i
DWG No G-01
1 ;t - '
KYANITE CLAIM BOUNDARY
M li]liwily
i)'i)v*l logging r ood
•^ 5
Ontario
Ministry of Natural
220
•••Ml MIM
* itMOTIt
North American DMum 1t?7
20 17 6500 51500 t it ••l
AM
(i*) ' W
OrM m(*rvM 1000 nwKMl *9*na ana •iplanaMry noM* oM*in*M* from •uMc torvic* C*ntf* Umt*Ky ft* Natural
Ouaan * *ar* T
ITt to if 4*00 M*oo
*0 If •MX) ftlftOO
?0 17 MOO fti40O
i
-ill lOSWOOli? 63 bit)/ANIi'INI
KYANITE MININGR M Blais H, Associates Ltd
..- ..North Bay Ontario
ANTOINE TOWNSHIPPROVINCE OF ONTARIO
DRAWN BY : RJU ^^ APPROVED BY "TMBSCALE
HAl 1000
W O ') l?
FILE NODRAWING NO
