George Segall, M.D. Stanford University Problems and Pitfalls in the Interpretation of PET/CT.

40
George Segall, M.D. VA Palo Alto Health Care Sys Stanford University Problems and Pitfalls in the Interpretation of PET/CT

Transcript of George Segall, M.D. Stanford University Problems and Pitfalls in the Interpretation of PET/CT.

Page 1: George Segall, M.D. Stanford University Problems and Pitfalls in the Interpretation of PET/CT.

George Segall, M.D.

VA Palo AltoHealth Care System

Stanford University

Problems and Pitfalls in the Interpretation of PET/CT

Page 2: George Segall, M.D. Stanford University Problems and Pitfalls in the Interpretation of PET/CT.

False Negative FDG PET

Histology

Size

Post prandial scans

Hyperglycemia

Low-grade gliomaLow-grade lymphomaBronchoalveolar lung cancerHepatomaRenal cell carcinomaProstate cancer

< 10 mm

> 150 mg/dL

Page 3: George Segall, M.D. Stanford University Problems and Pitfalls in the Interpretation of PET/CT.

57 year old man with stage IV left tonsillar scca treated with chemoradiation 21 months ago. Patient was lost to follow-up until he was referred for PET/CT. Coronal images show low FDG uptake in the brain, and high uptake in the heart and skeletal muscles.

Post Prandial Scan

Page 4: George Segall, M.D. Stanford University Problems and Pitfalls in the Interpretation of PET/CT.

• Fasting:

Euglycemia 6 hours

Diabetes12 hours

fed 04/25 fasting 05/08

Post Prandial Scan

Page 5: George Segall, M.D. Stanford University Problems and Pitfalls in the Interpretation of PET/CT.

51 year old man with colon polyps and a stricture referred for PET/CT to evaluate for possible malignancy. Fasting blood glucose level = 289 mg/dL. Coronal images show a good quality scan with normal FDG biodistribution.

Fasting Scan in a Diabetic

Page 6: George Segall, M.D. Stanford University Problems and Pitfalls in the Interpretation of PET/CT.

69 year old man with 2.3 cm RUL NSC lung cancer. FBS = 309 mg/dL. No insulin was given. Coronal images show a good quality scan with high FDG tumor uptake (max SUV 5.4)

Hyperglycemia

Page 7: George Segall, M.D. Stanford University Problems and Pitfalls in the Interpretation of PET/CT.

63 year old man with 5 cm RUL adenocarcinoma. FBS = 299 mg/dL; 90 minutes after 15u of reg insulin IV FBS = 179 mg/dL at which time FDG was injected. Coronal images show a “muscle scan” with faint tumor uptake (max SUV = 2.0)

Insulin Effect on FDG uptake

Page 8: George Segall, M.D. Stanford University Problems and Pitfalls in the Interpretation of PET/CT.

False Positive FDG PET

Physiologic

Benign Neoplasm

Inflammatory

Miscellaneous

Adenoma

Granuloma, sarcoid, rheumatoid

Prosthesis, grafts

Fractures

Page 9: George Segall, M.D. Stanford University Problems and Pitfalls in the Interpretation of PET/CT.

Physiologic Uptake

FDG subcutaneous infiltration

Page 10: George Segall, M.D. Stanford University Problems and Pitfalls in the Interpretation of PET/CT.

Physiologic Uptake

Tonsillar Hyperplasia

Page 11: George Segall, M.D. Stanford University Problems and Pitfalls in the Interpretation of PET/CT.

Talking

Nakamoto. Radiology 2005;234;879-885

Physiologic Uptake

Page 12: George Segall, M.D. Stanford University Problems and Pitfalls in the Interpretation of PET/CT.

Physiologic Uptake: Brown Fat

Page 13: George Segall, M.D. Stanford University Problems and Pitfalls in the Interpretation of PET/CT.

Brown Fat

• What is brown fat?

• Methods to reduce FDG uptake

Heat

Reassurance

Sedatives Beta blockers

Page 14: George Segall, M.D. Stanford University Problems and Pitfalls in the Interpretation of PET/CT.

74 yr old man with seizures and recent cognitive disorder

Adenoma

Page 15: George Segall, M.D. Stanford University Problems and Pitfalls in the Interpretation of PET/CT.

70 yr old man 2 months post chemoXRT for R piriform sinus cancer stage 3, T3N2M0.

Adenoma

Page 16: George Segall, M.D. Stanford University Problems and Pitfalls in the Interpretation of PET/CT.

63 y/o man 4 months post chemoXRT for R tonsil cancer T2N1M0

Adenoma

Page 17: George Segall, M.D. Stanford University Problems and Pitfalls in the Interpretation of PET/CT.

51 yr old man with colon cancer treated with rectosigmoid colectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy.

SUV adrenal 4.0SUV liver 2.2

Adenoma

Adrenal adenoma

Page 18: George Segall, M.D. Stanford University Problems and Pitfalls in the Interpretation of PET/CT.

Adenoma

82 year old man with wt loss and liver mass

Page 19: George Segall, M.D. Stanford University Problems and Pitfalls in the Interpretation of PET/CT.

Question 1

Which of the following neoplasms have been associated with focal FDG uptake in the colon?

a. Hyperplastic polyp

b. Adenomatous polyp

c. Adenocarcinoma

d. All of the above

Page 20: George Segall, M.D. Stanford University Problems and Pitfalls in the Interpretation of PET/CT.

Question 1

Gollub et al. Combined CT Colonography and 18F-FDG PET of Colon Polyps: Potential Technique for Selective Detection of Cancer and Precancerous Lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Jan;188(1):130-8.

d. All of the above

The correct answer is

Friedland et al. 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography has limited sensitivity for colonic adenoma and early stage colon cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Mar;61(3):395-400.

Page 21: George Segall, M.D. Stanford University Problems and Pitfalls in the Interpretation of PET/CT.

Nodular Hyperplasia

74 y/o man with metastatic disease to neck from unknown primary, now NED after chemoXRT

Page 22: George Segall, M.D. Stanford University Problems and Pitfalls in the Interpretation of PET/CT.

Infection

68 year old man with solitary lung nodule. Biopsy: aspergillosis

Page 23: George Segall, M.D. Stanford University Problems and Pitfalls in the Interpretation of PET/CT.

Granulomatous Disease

62 year old man with hilar and mediastinal adenopathy. Biopsy: sarcoidosis

Page 24: George Segall, M.D. Stanford University Problems and Pitfalls in the Interpretation of PET/CT.

Miscellaneous Causes

Thyroiditis

Page 25: George Segall, M.D. Stanford University Problems and Pitfalls in the Interpretation of PET/CT.

Miscellaneous Causes

Rib Fracture

Page 26: George Segall, M.D. Stanford University Problems and Pitfalls in the Interpretation of PET/CT.

Problems with CT

Attenuation and scatter

Beam hardening

Volume averaging

Page 27: George Segall, M.D. Stanford University Problems and Pitfalls in the Interpretation of PET/CT.

Beam Hardening

Gollub et al. J Nucl Med 2007;48:1583-1591

Page 28: George Segall, M.D. Stanford University Problems and Pitfalls in the Interpretation of PET/CT.

Beam Hardening

Page 29: George Segall, M.D. Stanford University Problems and Pitfalls in the Interpretation of PET/CT.

Volume Averaging

Gollub et al. J Nucl Med 2007;48:1583-1591

Page 30: George Segall, M.D. Stanford University Problems and Pitfalls in the Interpretation of PET/CT.

Problems with PET/CT

Patient movement

Respiratory misregistration

Attenuation correction

Page 31: George Segall, M.D. Stanford University Problems and Pitfalls in the Interpretation of PET/CT.

• Head movement

Secure head, or use head holder

Patient Movement

Page 32: George Segall, M.D. Stanford University Problems and Pitfalls in the Interpretation of PET/CT.

• Respiratory variation

from Ben Yeh MD, UCSF

Partial expiration best:

“Breathe in, exhale, don’t breathe”

Respiratory Misregistration

Page 33: George Segall, M.D. Stanford University Problems and Pitfalls in the Interpretation of PET/CT.

Respiratory Misregistration

Sureshbabu and Mawlawi. J Nucl Med Technol 2005;33:156-161

Page 34: George Segall, M.D. Stanford University Problems and Pitfalls in the Interpretation of PET/CT.

Question 2

Respiratory misregistration in PET/CT is minimized when

a. CT is performed in end inspiration

b. CT is performed in mid expiration

c. CT is performed in end expiration

d. CT is performed during quiet breathing

Page 35: George Segall, M.D. Stanford University Problems and Pitfalls in the Interpretation of PET/CT.

Question 2

The correct answer is

b. CT is performed in mid expiration

Sureshbabu W, Mawlawi O. PET/CT Imaging Artifacts. J Nucl Med Technol 2005;33:156-161

Page 36: George Segall, M.D. Stanford University Problems and Pitfalls in the Interpretation of PET/CT.

Attenuation Correction

Sureshbabu and Mawlawi. J Nucl Med Technol 2005;33:156-161

Page 37: George Segall, M.D. Stanford University Problems and Pitfalls in the Interpretation of PET/CT.

Attenuation Correction

Sureshbabu and Mawlawi. J Nucl Med Technol 2005;33:156-161

Page 38: George Segall, M.D. Stanford University Problems and Pitfalls in the Interpretation of PET/CT.

Summary

• False negative FDG PET can be reduced by careful patient selection for appropriateness and proper preparation

• False positive FDG PET can be reduced by correlation with CT and knowledge of potential pitfalls

Page 39: George Segall, M.D. Stanford University Problems and Pitfalls in the Interpretation of PET/CT.

Summary

• CT artifacts can be avoided by optimizing technique

• PET/CT artifacts can be reduced by proper patient preparation and instructions

Page 40: George Segall, M.D. Stanford University Problems and Pitfalls in the Interpretation of PET/CT.