Geology 230 Groundwater/ surface water interaction Tim Horner Geology Department, CSU Sacramento

35
Geology 230 Groundwater/ surface water interaction Tim Horner Geology Department, CSU Sacramento Week 1: Stream classification Reading assignment: 1) EPA Watershed Academy, 2005, Fundamentals of the Rosgen Stream Classification System: Accessed 8/29/05 at http://www.epa.gov/watertrain/stream_clas/index.htm. 2) Montgomery, D. R., and Buffington, J. M., 1994, Channel-reach morphology in mountain drainage basins: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 109, pp. 596-611. 3) Mial, A. D., 1977, Lithofacies Types and Vertical Profile Models in Braided River Deposits: A Summary, in, Fluvial Sedimentology — Memoir 5, Fluvial Facies Models, pp. 597-604. SACRAMENTO STATE

description

SACRAMENTO. STATE. Geology 230 Groundwater/ surface water interaction Tim Horner Geology Department, CSU Sacramento. Week 1: Stream classification Reading assignment: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Geology 230 Groundwater/ surface water interaction Tim Horner Geology Department, CSU Sacramento

Page 1: Geology 230 Groundwater/ surface water interaction Tim Horner Geology Department, CSU Sacramento

Geology 230Groundwater/ surface water

interaction

Tim HornerGeology Department, CSU Sacramento

Week 1: Stream classification

Reading assignment:

1) EPA Watershed Academy, 2005, Fundamentals of the Rosgen Stream Classification System:  Accessed 8/29/05 at http://www.epa.gov/watertrain/stream_clas/index.htm.  2) Montgomery, D. R., and Buffington, J. M., 1994, Channel-reach morphology in mountain drainage basins: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 109, pp. 596-611.

3) Mial, A. D., 1977, Lithofacies Types and Vertical Profile Models in Braided River Deposits: A Summary, in, Fluvial Sedimentology — Memoir 5, Fluvial Facies Models, pp. 597-604.

SACRAMENTOSTATE

Page 2: Geology 230 Groundwater/ surface water interaction Tim Horner Geology Department, CSU Sacramento

Methods used to characterize streams:

Miall- A sedimentologist’s approach

Rosgen- Based on channel morphology

Montgomery and Buffington- More process based

Page 3: Geology 230 Groundwater/ surface water interaction Tim Horner Geology Department, CSU Sacramento

From Miall, 1977

Miall’s lithofaciesdesignations

Page 4: Geology 230 Groundwater/ surface water interaction Tim Horner Geology Department, CSU Sacramento

Miall’s stream types- braided rivers

From Miall, 1977

Page 5: Geology 230 Groundwater/ surface water interaction Tim Horner Geology Department, CSU Sacramento

Miall’s stream types- braided riversExamples are intended to show all of the variability in braided streams.Several are based on glacial outwash

From Miall, 1977

proximal -------------------------distal High energy with limited sediment supply

Debris flow

Page 6: Geology 230 Groundwater/ surface water interaction Tim Horner Geology Department, CSU Sacramento

Rosgen’s classification system

Advantages Disadvantages• Simple key, can be used by inexperienced field hands• Looks mostly at form

• Simple key, can be used by inexperienced field hands• May not represent scale accurately

From: EPA Watershed Academy, 2005

Page 7: Geology 230 Groundwater/ surface water interaction Tim Horner Geology Department, CSU Sacramento

Rosgen’s classification system Three main parts:

• Level I classification, which is based on the stream characteristics that result from relief, landform, and valley morphology;

• Valley type, a primary determinant of stream form; • Level II classification, which provides more detailed morphological description of stream type from field measurements of channel form and bed composition.

From: EPA Watershed Academy, 2005

Page 8: Geology 230 Groundwater/ surface water interaction Tim Horner Geology Department, CSU Sacramento

Level I Stream Classification

The Level I stream classification serves four primary functions:

1. Provide for the initial integration of basin characteristics, valley types, and landforms with stream system morphology.

2. Provide a consistent initial framework for organizing river information and communicating the aspects of river morphology. Mapping of physiographic attributes at Level I can quickly determine location and approximate percentage of river types within a watershed and/or valley type.

3. Assist in the setting of priorities for conducting more detailed assessments and/or companion inventories.

4. Correlate similar general level inventories such as fisheries habitat, river boating categories, and riparian habitat with companion river inventories.

The Level 1 Stream Classification produces a letter: A - G

Page 9: Geology 230 Groundwater/ surface water interaction Tim Horner Geology Department, CSU Sacramento

Level I Stream Classification

• Is landscape scale• Can be accomplished with topo maps or air photos

From: EPA Watershed Academy, 2005

Page 10: Geology 230 Groundwater/ surface water interaction Tim Horner Geology Department, CSU Sacramento

Level 1 assessmentDepends on basin-scale factors:

From: EPA Watershed Academy, 2005

Page 11: Geology 230 Groundwater/ surface water interaction Tim Horner Geology Department, CSU Sacramento

From: EPA Watershed Academy, 2005

Variables:• gradient• width/depth ratio• lateral confinement• sinuosity

High energy, high sediment load

• entrenchment• meander geometry• erosion• sinuosity

multiple channels

anastomosing stable channel, more entrenched, low relief

Page 12: Geology 230 Groundwater/ surface water interaction Tim Horner Geology Department, CSU Sacramento

Level 2 assessment: Valley typeThere are 11 Valley Types. Valley types may correlate with Level 1 stream types

From: EPA Watershed Academy, 2005

Page 13: Geology 230 Groundwater/ surface water interaction Tim Horner Geology Department, CSU Sacramento

Level 2 assessment: Valley typeThere are 11 Valley Types. Valley types may correlate with Level 1 stream types

From: EPA Watershed Academy, 2005

Type X, XI may include wetlands

Page 14: Geology 230 Groundwater/ surface water interaction Tim Horner Geology Department, CSU Sacramento

Part 3: Level II Stream ClassificationCross-sectional measurements

Entrenchment Ratio: A computed index value which is used to describe the degree of vertical containment of a river channel (width of the flood prone area at an elevation twice the maximum bankfull depth/bankfull width). Width/depth Ratio: An index value which indicates the shape of the channel cross-section (ratio of bankfull width/mean bankfull depth). Dominant Channel Materials: A selected particle size index value, the D50, representing the most prevalent of one of six channel material types or size categories, as determined from a channel material size distribution analysis. Longitudinal Profile measurements

Slope: Slope of the water surface averaged for 20-30 channel widths. Bed Features: Secondary delineative criteria describing channel configuration in terms of riffle/pools, rapids, step/pools, cascades and convergence/divergence features which are inferred from channel plan form and gradient.

Plan-form (pattern) measurements

Sinuosity: Defined as stream length/valley length or valley slope/channel slope). Meander Width Ratio: A secondary delineative criteria defined as meander belt width/bankfull width that describes the degree of lateral channel containment, and is primarily used in assisting aerial photo delineation of stream types.

From: EPA Watershed Academy, 2005

Page 15: Geology 230 Groundwater/ surface water interaction Tim Horner Geology Department, CSU Sacramento

Part 3: Level II Stream ClassificationFrom: EPA Watershed Academy, 2005

Page 16: Geology 230 Groundwater/ surface water interaction Tim Horner Geology Department, CSU Sacramento

Part 3: Level II Stream ClassificationFrom: EPA Watershed Academy, 2005

Page 17: Geology 230 Groundwater/ surface water interaction Tim Horner Geology Department, CSU Sacramento

Gathering field data for Level II Stream Classification:

From: EPA Watershed Academy, 2005

Visual or physical indicators of the bankfull stage:

The presence of a floodplain at the elevation of incipient flooding.

The elevation associated with the top of the highest depositional features (e.g., point bars, central bars within the active channel). These depositional features are especially good stage indicators for channels in the presence of terraces or adjacent colluvial slopes.

A break in slope of the banks and/or a change in the particle size distribution, (since finer material is associated with deposition by overflow, rather than deposition of coarser material within the active channel).

Evidence of an inundation feature such as small benches. Staining of rocks.

Exposed root hairs below an intact soil layer indicating exposure to erosive flow.

Lichens and - for some stream types and locales - certain riparian vegetation species

Page 18: Geology 230 Groundwater/ surface water interaction Tim Horner Geology Department, CSU Sacramento

Measuring bankfull stage in the field:

From: EPA Watershed Academy, 2005

Page 19: Geology 230 Groundwater/ surface water interaction Tim Horner Geology Department, CSU Sacramento

Estimating entrenchment ratio:

From: EPA Watershed Academy, 2005

Page 20: Geology 230 Groundwater/ surface water interaction Tim Horner Geology Department, CSU Sacramento

Estimating width/depth ratio:

From: EPA Watershed Academy, 2005

Page 21: Geology 230 Groundwater/ surface water interaction Tim Horner Geology Department, CSU Sacramento

Estimating sinuosity:

From: EPA Watershed Academy, 2005

Page 22: Geology 230 Groundwater/ surface water interaction Tim Horner Geology Department, CSU Sacramento

Estimating slope:

From: EPA Watershed Academy, 2005

Page 23: Geology 230 Groundwater/ surface water interaction Tim Horner Geology Department, CSU Sacramento

Estimating channel material (pebble counts):

From: EPA Watershed Academy, 2005

Page 24: Geology 230 Groundwater/ surface water interaction Tim Horner Geology Department, CSU Sacramento

Summary: Rosgen’s stream classification method

From: EPA Watershed Academy, 2005

Page 25: Geology 230 Groundwater/ surface water interaction Tim Horner Geology Department, CSU Sacramento

Montgomery and Buffington, 1997:

Montgomery and Buffington, 1997

Looks at reach-level stream features

7 alluvial channel types:

colluvial

bedrock

cascade

step pool

plane bed

pool riffle

dune riffle

Page 26: Geology 230 Groundwater/ surface water interaction Tim Horner Geology Department, CSU Sacramento

Montgomery and Buffington channel types:

From: Montgomery and Buffington, 1997

Page 27: Geology 230 Groundwater/ surface water interaction Tim Horner Geology Department, CSU Sacramento

Montgomery and Buffington channel types:

From: Montgomery and Buffington, 1997

Page 28: Geology 230 Groundwater/ surface water interaction Tim Horner Geology Department, CSU Sacramento

Montgomery and Buffington channel types:

From: Montgomery and Buffington, 1997

Page 29: Geology 230 Groundwater/ surface water interaction Tim Horner Geology Department, CSU Sacramento

From: Montgomery and Buffington, 1997

Montgomery and Buffington: channel type vs. gradient

Page 30: Geology 230 Groundwater/ surface water interaction Tim Horner Geology Department, CSU Sacramento

From: Montgomery and Buffington, 1997

Montgomery and Buffington: channel type vs. drainage area

Page 31: Geology 230 Groundwater/ surface water interaction Tim Horner Geology Department, CSU Sacramento

From: Montgomery and Buffington, 1997

Montgomery and Buffington: channel type vs. roughness and grain size

Page 32: Geology 230 Groundwater/ surface water interaction Tim Horner Geology Department, CSU Sacramento

From: Montgomery and Buffington, 1997

Montgomery and Buffington: channel type vs. roughness and grain size

Page 33: Geology 230 Groundwater/ surface water interaction Tim Horner Geology Department, CSU Sacramento

From: Montgomery and Buffington, 1997

Montgomery and Buffington: channel type transport capacity

Page 34: Geology 230 Groundwater/ surface water interaction Tim Horner Geology Department, CSU Sacramento

From: Montgomery and Buffington, 1997

Montgomery and Buffington: channel response to changes in sediment supply and discharge

Page 35: Geology 230 Groundwater/ surface water interaction Tim Horner Geology Department, CSU Sacramento

Other methods of stream characterization:

Strahler, order of streams