GEOL & GEOCH OF THE KALADAR CL PROJECT GRENTARIO...31C11NEaei25 2.2727 KALADAR ^,^ 010 GEOLOGY AND...
Transcript of GEOL & GEOCH OF THE KALADAR CL PROJECT GRENTARIO...31C11NEaei25 2.2727 KALADAR ^,^ 010 GEOLOGY AND...
CANADIAN OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM LTD.
MINERALS DIVISION
31C11NEaei25 2.2727 KALADAR ^,^010
GEOLOGY AND GEOCHEMISTRY
Of the
KALADAR CLAIMS
PROJECT GRENTARIO
Lot 5 Cone. X, XiLot 6 Cone. X, XI (EastLot 7 Cone. IX, X, XiLot 8 Cone. IX, X
Kaladar TP. Lennox and Addington Co.Ontario
NTS 31 C/ll
Claims EO - 503939-503967
ft f
by: D.M.Robertson,B.Se.(Hons.)
Work Completed During the Period April 7, 8 and May 2 to 12, 1978
3iciiNEeeas z . 2727 KALADAR 010C
SUMMARY.... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . lINTRODUCTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2LOCATION AND ACCESS....... .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2PREVIOUS WORK. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5WORK COMPLETED....... . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5PHYSIOGRAPHY..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . ........ 8GEOLOGY. . . . . . . .. ... .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
General Geology.......... . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. .. . 9Description of the rock units.................. 11Economic Geology.......,....................... 14Summary of Geology and Mineralization.......... 14
SOIL GEOCHEMISTRY . ............ . .. . . . . . . . . .. . .. 15Introduction........ ..... ... ....... . .. .. .... ... 15Sampling Procedures............................ 15Laboratory Procedures................. ... ...... 15Statistical Treatment of Results............... 16Results of the Soil Geochemistry Survey........ 20
POND AND STREAM SEDIMENT GEOCHEMISTRY............. 21ROCK GEOCHEMISTRY....... . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . 23LAKE SEDIMENT SURVEY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ... .... . . . . . . . 25
Introduction................. . .. . .. ... .. . .. .. .. 25Results.................^ . . . .. . . .. . . .. . .. ... . .. 26Conclusion..................... ..... ..... .... . . 32
SUMMARY OF ANOMALIES... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS................... 35
APPENDIX I. . . ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . ............ 37
LIST OF FIGURES................................... ii
LIST OF TABLES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . .'. lil
LIST OF PLANS..... ....... ............... . . . . . . . . . . iii
FIGURES
Figure Page
1 Location Map 3
2 Detailed Location Map 4
3 Proposed grid 6
4 Frequency distribution of zinc in B soils 17
5 Frequency distribution of zinc in pond and stream 18 sediment
6 Cumulative frequency distribution of zinc in B soils,non-anomalous population 19
7 Cumulative frequency distribution of zinc in pond andstream sediment, non-anomalous population 2 2
8 Frequency distributions of metals in Otter Creek Lakesediment 27
9 Frequency distribution of loss on ignition, Otter CreekLake sediments 28
10 Cumulative frequencies of non-anomalous populations,Otter Creek Lake sediments 29
11 Cumulative frequency of non-anomalous zinc populationin Otter Creek Lake sediments 30
12 Location of G.S.C. Lake sediment values 34
APPENDIX I
Laboratory Geochemical Reports 37
TABLES
Table Page
1 Table of Formations 10
2 Statistical data for zinc in B soils 20
3 Statistical data for zinc in pond and stream sediment 20
4 Anomalous threshold and mean values for zinc 16
5 Range of zinc values in rock chip samples 23
6 Statistical summary of lake sediment sample data 31
7 Comparison of G.S.C. lake sediment values above andbelow Spry Lake Showing 33
PLANS
Plan
1 Geology
2 "B" horizon soil, pond sediment and rock chip geochemistry sample locations and zinc values
3 Zinc contours in "B" horizon soils
4 Lake sediment sample locations and metal values.
- iii -
(1)
SUMMARY
The Kaladar property is underlain by metasedimentary
and metavolcanic rocks of the "Grenville Series". These rocks
lie in a tightly folded northeast to southwesterly trending
structure known as the Clare River syncline, which is bounded on
the southeast by quartz monzonite of the Sheffield pluton.
The belts of marble, up to 2000 feet wide, were found
on the claims. These marbles are potential hosts for high grade
zinc mineralization, although none has been found in the claims
at this time.
Work on the claims includes 25.2 miles (40.6 km) of
line cutting, 12.5 line miles (20.1 km) of geological mapping
and 14.8 line miles (23.7 km) of geochemical sampling. 66 lake
sediment samples, 268 B horizon soil samples, 33 pond and stream
sediment samples, and 46 roc^chip samples were taken. All
samples were analyzed for zinc. The lake sediment samples were
also analyzed for copper and lead.
Two significant zinc soil anomalies were obtained.
The largest, with values up to 910 ppm zinc, lies just northeast
of the claims and appears to be due to glacial dispersion from
mineralization located further to the north. The other soil
anomaly with values up to 735 ppm zinc lies along the belt of
marble located between the central beaver ponds and the
Lingham Lakes. More detailed soil sampling is required in this
area.
(2)
INTRODUCTION
29 claims covering Concessions IX, X, XI, Lots 5,
6, 7, and 8, were staked for Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd.
in Kaladar Township, Ontario, on ground underlain by part of the
Clare River Syncline. Marbles in this structure are potential
hosts for- zinc deposits of the type characterized by the Baltnat-
Edwards district of New York and the Long Lake zinc mine in
neighbouring Frontenac County.
Staking was done under contract by:
E. Romaniuk (EO 503039-53) and G. Desautels (EO 503954-67) of
Jean Alix Company Ltd., of Val d'Or in July 1977, and recorded
at Toronto on July 19, 1977. The claims were transferred to
Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd., Minrals Division, on August 22,
1977.
This report will describe the geology of the claim area
and the results obtained from a geochemical soil survey completed
by Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd., Minerals Division, the
holder of the claims.
LOCATION AND ACCESS
The centre of the property is located approximately
2*s miles southeast of the village of Kaladar (see Figures l and 2)
The southwest edge of the property can be reached via a narrow,
private track which turns off Hwy 41, 4 miles south of Kaladar.
Two narrow tracks lead through abandoned fields to the northeast
edge of the property from a gravel road which turns off Hwy. 7,
2^ miles east of Kaladar.
fcv it.
f .Jim.-w
.AK
fafc
i-. A rf,,i.J-*
*,,!I
,,iu-j;
LOCATION6? KALADAR CLAWS
(5)
PREVIOUS WORK
The property lies within an area mapped in 1977 by
J.M. Wolff of the Geological Branch, Ontario Ministry of
Natural Resources. A preliminary map (P. 1563) at a scale
of l inch to h mile is available at present along with a summary
of field work (O.D.M. Summary 19-7 Field Work, Misc. Paper 75).
This area is also covered at a scale of l inch to 2 miles by
the Madoc Area map sheet Number 2053 published in 1964 by
D.F. Hewitt , and at a scale of l inch to l mile on Map No.Sld-2Grimsthorpe-Kennebec Area by W.D. Harding, 1942 .
The only recorded assessment work in the immediate
area is by Glenshire Mines Ltd. which holds 12 claims which
adjoin Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd.'s claims to the
south and west. Work .on these claims consisted of geochemical
sampling, geological mapping, geophysical surveys and six
diamond drill holes. This work outlined the presence of two
radioactive pegmatite dykes and a zinc soil anomaly with values
up to 1480 ppm.
WORK COMPLETED
1) Line Cutting:
A cut and picketed grid, consisting of a 10,000 foot
(3050 m) base.ine, two tielines, each totalling 10,000 feet
{3050 m), and 26 crosslines varying from 8,000 feet (2440 m)
Hewitt, D.F.1964, Geological notes for Maps Nos. 2053 S 2054Madoc-Gananoque: O.D.M.
2 Harding, W.D.1944, Geology of Kaladar and Kennebec Townshipsin O.D.M. 51st Ann.Rep. Vol.LI,Part IV,1942.
(7)
to 13,000 feet (3960 m) was planned to cover the claims. This
would have totalled 282,000 feet (86,000 m) or 59.1 miles
(95 km). The proposed grid is shown on Figure 3.
Jean Alix Company Ltd., of Val d'Or, P.Q., was
contracted to complete this work during March, 1978. Line
cutting was undertaken between March 12 and 25, 1978.
Unfortunately, the rapid break up of the ice in
late March forced the cancellation of the line cutting at
which time only 133,100 feet (40,600 m) or 25.2 miles (40.6 km)
had been cut. Of this total, only 85,100 feet (25,950 m) or
16.1 Miles (25.9 km) was chained. The completed lines are
shown on Plan l
2) Geological Mapping;
A total of 12.5 line miles (20.1 km) of geological
mapping was completed between May 2 and 12, 1978, by D.M.
Robertson of Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd. Of this total,
5.2 miles (8.3 km) was completed on cut and picketed lines
spaced 400 feet apart and the remaining 7.3 miles (11.7 km)
was completed on pace and compass lines spaced approximately
800 to 1000 feet apart.
3) Geochemical Sampling;
A total of 14.8 line miles (23.7 km) were soil
sampled by D.M. Robertson and J.R. Hill on April 7 and 8 and
by D.M. Robertson between May 2 and 12, 1978. Samples were
taken at 200 foot intervals on the cut and picketed lines
which were spaced 400 feet apart and at 400 foot intervals
on the pace and compass lines which were spaced 800 to 1000
feet apart. Details of the samples are as follows:
(8)
Sample Type Element Determined No. of Samples
'B' horizon soil Zn 267
Pond or stream sediment Zn 33
Rock chip Zn 46
Total samples 347
347 samples of all types were taken, for a total of
347 determinations.
4) Names and addresses of personnel:
David M. Robertson Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd. GeologicalMinerals Division mapping and801-161 Eglinton Ave. E., geochemicalToronto, Ont. sampling
Johannes R. Hill " Geochemicalsampling
Dr. R.H. Wallis,P.Eng. " Chief geologist
Dr. C.F. Gleeson C.F. Gleeson S Associates Geochemical764 Belfast Rd., consultant Ottawa, Ont.
Irenee Cyr Jean Alix Co. Ltd. LinecutterC.P. 910, Val d'Or, P.Q.
Edouard Morrissette " "
Yvon Champagne " "
Richard Desfosses " "
PHYSIOGRAPHY
Relief on the property is low, everywhere less than
50 feet with ground surface elevations ranging from 600 to
650 feet. The topography consits of low, parallel lying,
elongated bedrock ridges and hollows trending northeast to
southwest along the strike direction of the rock units.
(9)
Beavers are very active and most of the low ground
is covered by long swamps or beaver ponds. There are two
main chains of lakes on the property, the Otter Creek Lakes
in the northwest, and the Lingham Lakes in the southeast.
Lying between these is a long series of beaver ponds which
effectively cut the claims in half.
The two major marble units lie on either side of
the central chain of beaver ponds and form the higher and
better drained ground.
There is generally only a thin mantle of till and
bedrock exposure is good throughout most of the claim area.
Vegetation;
The claims are generally wooded with a mixed semi-
mature to mature stand of deciduous and coniferous trees.
The best stands are over the marbles. There are numerous
open grassy areas over the bedrock ridges where the soil is
too thin to support a heavier growth. Thick cedar is common
on the lower ground. There are also some abandoned fields
over the marble unit at the northeastern edge of the claims.
GEOLOGY
General Geology
The Kaladar claims are underlain by part of the
Clare River Syncline which consists of Precambrian metasedi-
mentary and metavolcanic rocks of the "Grenville Series" group.
These are bounded on the southeast by quartz monzonite of the
Sheffield pluton. Marbles in this syncline are potential
(10)
hosts for high grade zinc mineralization of the type found
at the Long Lake mine in nearby Olden Township.
Mapping was restricted to the area between the Otter
Creek Lakes and the Lingham Lakes and was primarily intended
to delineate the extent of the marble units. This area was
mapped at a scale of l inch to 400 feet along pace and compass
lines oriented perpendicular to the strike and spaced
approximately 1000 feet apart. The completed portion of a
cut and picketed grid was used for reference at the northeast
edge of the claims. Grid lines were spaced 400 feet apart.
Mapping was done in conjunction with soil sampling. The
geology is shown on Plan 1.
The claim area was divided into five units as out-
- lined on Table l
Table l Table of Formations
CENOZOIC
Recent Pleistocene till - organic swamp and lake sediment
Unconformity
PRECAMBRIAN
5 Pegmatite dikes
4 Quartz monzonite intrusive contact
3a hornblende- (biotite) feldspar gneiss
3b biotite or muscovite schist
2 marble
la quartz-feldspar-biotite gneiss
Ib biotite-quartz-feldspar gneiss
(11)
A Unit l consists of quartz-feldspar-biotite gneiss (la) and
biotite-quartz-feldspar gneiss (lb). Unit 2 is the marble.
Unit 3 consists of medium to coarse grained foliated hornblende-
feldspar gneiss (3a) and a medium grained biotite or muscovite
schist (3b). These rocks are considered to be metavolcanic in
origin. Unit 4 is the quartz monzonite of the Sheffield Pluton,
Unit 5 consists of coarse grained pegmatite dikes.
Rocks of the "Grenville Series" group in this area
have undergone middle almandine-amphibolite grade regional
metamorphism. This has obscured many of the original features
of the rocks.
The rock units strike consistently about north 45
east and dip to the southeast. The dip steepens towards the
contact with the quartz monzonite.
Description of the rock units;
Unit l
Quartz-feldspar-biotite gneiss (la) and biotite-
quartz-feldspar gneiss (lb).
This is a pink to grey, weakly foliated fine to
medium grained rock. It is predominantly quartzo-feldspathic
with the amount of biotite increasing in the darker toned
horizons. The biotite rich gneiss is interbanded with and
grades into the quartzo-feldspathic gneiss within the scale
of an outcrop. Garnet is a common accessory mineral. This
would appear to be a metamorphosed quartzite and greywacke
sequence. Thin quartz lenses are common in both units. The
quartz-feldspar-biotite gneiss forms the predominant rock type
in the area of the central beaver ponds and between the central
marble belt and the Lingham Lakes.
(12)
Unit 2 - Marble
Three belts of marble were found on the property.
The marble is generally blue grey or white, medium to coarse
grained and appears to be composed mostly of calcite. There
are occasional bands of tremolitic marble, and some interbedded
quartzite bands. The marble occasionally shows fine lamina
tions formed by alternating grey and white colour bands.
The marble generally occupies the higher ground.
The largest belt is about 2000 feet wide and lies between
the Otter Creek Lakes and the central beaver ponds. The
contact with the meta-volcanic rocks to the northwest runs
through the centre of the Otter Creek Lakes, while the south
eastern contact runs approximately along the edge, of the central
beaver ponds. There is also an 800 foot wide belt of marble
lying between the central beaver ponds and the Lingham Lakes.
The third belt of marble lies along the shore of the upper
Lingham Lakes. A fault runs through the Lingham Lakes,
separating the marble from the quartz monzonite to the south-
east.
No zinc mineralization was seen on the property,
however, three miles to the southwest in the same belt of
marbles is a showing of sphalerite and zinkenite. As there
is no gossan or staining or other sulphide mineralization
associated with the showing, it is difficult to detect on
weathered outcrop surfaces. This the type of mineralization
expected on the claims.
(13)
Unit 3 - hornblende (biotite) feldspar gneiss (3a) and biotite
or muscovite schist (3b).
These rocks have been interpreted as meta-volcanics,
alhthough most primary features have been obscured by regional
metamorphism. Relic pillow structures are visible in one
outcrop of coarse hornblende gneiss on the southwest h of
Lot 7, Cone. X.
These rocks are generally medium grained, well
foliated to schistose and consist primarily of hornblende,
biotite and feldspar. Garnets are a common accessory mineral.
Several small, localized gossan zones were noted
in the schistose rocks. They are probably due to disseminated
pyrite. There are no high zinc values associated with them.
The area to the northwest of the Otter Creek Lakes
is underlain entirely by Unit 3. Between the Otter Creek Lakes
and the Lingham Lakes, the metavolcanics outcrop as narrow
discontinuous bands within the quartz-feldspar-biotite gneiss.
There appears to be a gradation between the hornblende rich
gneiss and the biotite-quartz-feldspar gneiss rather than a
distinct contact.
Unit 4 - quartz monzonite
The quartz monzonite intrudes the metasediments and
meta-volcanics in the vicinity of the Lingham Lakes. The
contact is a zone of "lit par lit" intrusion. A fault running
through the upper Lingham Lakes separates the quartz monzonite
from the marble in this area.
The quartz monzonite is pale pink, medium grained and
weakly foliated, and consists mostly of quartz and feldspar
with minor amounts of biotite. No mineralization was noted
in this unit.
(14)
Unit 5 Pegmatite Dikes
A coarse grained, quartz-feldspar tourmaline pegmatite
dike intrudes the quartz feldspar biolite gneiss on the
southwest quarter of Lot 8, Cone. XI. The dike extends for
over 100 feet along strike with a width of about 30 feet.
The tourmaline crystals reach 5 cm in length.
Economic Geology;
The primary target in the claim area was high grade
zinc mineralization of the type found at Long Lake in
Frontenac County. No zinc mineralization was found on the
claims. A showing of sphalerite and zinkenite is known to
occur three miles to the southwest in the same belt of marble
as underlies the claims.
The only mineralization seen on the claims was weak
disseminated pyrite associated with gossan zones in the
schistose rocks and some pyrite associated with quartz veins
in the quartzQ-feldspathic gneiss.
Summary of Geology and Mineralization
The claims are underlain by metasediments and metavolca-
nics of the "Grenville Series" which lie in a lightly folded
northeast-southwesterly trending structure known as the
Clare R. syncline. This is bounded on the southeast by quartz
monzonite of the Sheffield Pluton.
No economic mineralization was found on the claims,
although three belts of marble, which are potential host
l rocks for zinc mineralization are present. These warrant
further investigation and more detailed soil sampling.
(15)
Geo chemis try
Introduction;
Relief on the property is low, consisting of parallel
rocky ridges protruding through a thin veneer of till. The
soils are generally thin and exhibit a homogeneous brown
wooded profile. They usually have a thin Ah horizon under
a cover of leaf litter, no leached Ac horizon, and an orange
brown silty sand "B" horizon. Much of the lower ground is
occupied by swamps or beaver ponds.
Sampling Procedures;
Soil samples were taken at intervals of 200 feet on
picket lines spaced 400 feet apart and at intervals of 400
feet on pace and compass lines spaced approximately 1000 feet
apart. A sample was taken from the top of the B horizon at
each site, usually at a depth of 4 to 8 inches.
Sediment samples were taken from the edge of the beaver
ponds and swamps. Rock chip samples were taken at roughly
1000 foot intervals along the lines.
All samples were stored in heavy duty, high wet strength
Kraft envelopes then sent to Bondar and Clegg Company Ltd.
in Ottawa for analysis.
Laboratory Procedures;
The samples are dried and sieved to -80 mesh (-100 mesh
for rock chips) and analyzed as follows:
0.5 gms of sample is digested in 1.5 mis HNO~ for Jj hr.
in a hot (90 C) water bath. 0.5 mis HCL is added and the
digestion proceeds for an additional l*s hrs. The solution is
then bulked up to 10 mis with de-ionized water, shaken,
(16)
allowed to settle, and analyzed by Atomic Absorption against
known standards.
Statistical Treatment of Results;
To determine mean and anomalous levels, the geochemical
values obtained from the laboratory (Appendix I) were grouped
into fixed ranges (Tables 2,3). Histograms were drawn to
show the total number of values within each group (Figures 4,
5). A best fit curve is drawn through the majority of the
population so that it approximates a normal distribution
curve.
All metal values higher than those in the main popula
tion were arbitrarily classed as anomalous and eliminated
from further statistical treatment.
In order to define a mean background value and a probably
anomalous threshold, a cumulative frequency graph is drawn
for the non-anomalous population (Figures 6,7). The fiftieth
percentile is defined as the background mean and the value of
the ninety-seventh percentile defines the lower limit of the
probably anomalous population. Table 4 below lists the
anomalous, threshold and mean values for zinc in B soils and
pond and stream sediment.
Table 4 - Anomalous, threshold and mean values for zinc (ppm)
B soils
Pond and Stream Sediment
Anomalous
250
125
Threshold
218
103
Mean
106
60
ltc*
OCD
(O*
cri
S
: N
8"'ls
^NoQ
"^im
40
-itf lb
isQ
^H
t jtfl'Q
t^ *
^ X
***
^''^
Hi-^
-
-t;.: ..i ±*4
i*Stto
itH^ .*
JrW
'*^bto
^t^
^ste o\oe
.--.
:
i! v,. 1 - ki nn ir v i .?M d to "" t m (i s *i, V\ ' K- X li; .10 J.HL IUCH' i x !-' ..-' n; S oioe
(19)
'•J.
8*
l"
\t*
fN
/Od Z 60
PPM Z./MC,
(20)
table 2 - Statistical data for zinc in B soils
Range (ppm)
0-50 51 - 100
101 - 150 151 - 200 201 - 250 251 - 300 301 - 350 351 - 400 401 - 450 451 - 500 7500
Frequency
33 73 78 35 13 6
10 7 3 2
268
Cumulative Frequency
33 106 184 219 232
Cumulative %
14.2 45.7 79.3 94.4
100.0
Table 3 - Statistical data for zinc in pond and stream sediment
Range (ppm)
0-2526 - 5057 - 7576 - 100
101 - 125126 - 150151 - 175176 - 200201 - 225226 - 250251 - 275275 - 300^300 = 3
Frequencyi ———————— * —
35661114-21-
Cumulative Frequency
38
142021
Cumulative \* -,. , . p
14.338.166.795.2
100.0
Results of the Soil Geochemistry Survey
Soil sample locations and the zinc values obtained are
shown on Plan 2. Zinc contours are shown on Plan 3.
Zinc values range from 5 to 910 ppm, with a mean value
of 106 ppm and an anomalous level of 250 ppm.
Except for one exception, all zinc values over 400 ppm
were found over the two major marble units. It is apparent
(21)
the marble has a higher background level than the other
rock units for zinc. Zinc values are low northwest of the
Otter Creek Lakes and in the southeast in the vicinity of
the Lingham Lakes.
There are two significant anomalies. Anomaly l is in
the extreme northeast corner of the grid. There are 8 samples
over 400 ppm, all of which had the highest value obtained--
910 ppm. This appears to be a glacial dispersion fan from
mineralization located up-ice, further to the northeast.
No zinc mineralization was noted in the area of the soil
anomaly.
Anomaly 2 consists of three samples along a strike length
of 2000 feet which range from 600 ppm to 735 ppm. These are
located over the marble unit between the central beaver ponds
and the Lingham Lakes. This same marble belt was found to
contain anomalous zinc soil values further to the southwest
by Glenshire Mines Ltd. whose property adjoins Canadian
Occidental Petroleum's claims.
Pond and Stream Sediment Geochemistry;
Thirty-three sediment samples were taken from the edge
of the beaver ponds, swamps and streams on the property. The
samples were usually highly organic, being composed mainly
of roots, fibres and decomposed leaf litter. In some cases
the samples were taken from flooded Ah horizons.
Zinc values ranged from 18 to 620 ppm with a mean of 60
ppm for the normal population and an anomalous level of 125
ppm. The distribution appears to be bimodal, with a second
peak between 175 and 200 ppm. Two-hundred (200) ppm zinc
was considered to be the anomalous level for sediment samples
(22)
si3 OVI
T
too
foO
ox
. - . ...,. ..... ....j
Sif too
VALUE. /A/
2/A/C
(23)
aken from the Otter Creek Lakes.
All the samples taken from the beaver pond south of
the soil anomaly in the northeast corner of the grid were
anomalous. Values ranged from 184 ppm to 620 ppm. There '
were also three anomalous samples from the northeast end of
the Otter Creek Lakes (251 to 390 ppm) which would also
relate to the soil anomaly in this area.
There are also several anomalous values scattered along
the Lingham Lakes chain with a value of 480 ppm. These may
be related to the narrow belt of marble which runs along the
contact with the quartz monzonite in this area.
Rock Geochemistry
The cause of soil anomalies may be due to an abnormally
high metal background in certain rocks and not to sulphide
mineralization. To determine whether this condition existed,
46 rock chip samples were collected at various locations in
the claim area. Table 5 gives the range of zinc values found
in each rock unit.
Table 5 - Range of zinc values in rock chip samples
Rock Unit
5432
la Ib
No. of Samples
133
279 3
Range in ppm
49 - 7.7
22 - 1106 - 150
14 - 116 \ 27 - 40 J
Mean
—
--1435
(24)
tThe greatest range of values is in Unit 2 , the marble.
However, the mean value (14 ppm) is lower than that of
Unit l (35 ppm). Thus, the marble would appear to have a
low background level for zinc, so that the high soil values
are most likely related to zinc mineralization.
(25)
LAKE SEDIMENT SURVEY
Lot 5, Cone. X, XI Lot 6 , Cone. X, XI (East h) Lot l , Cone. IX, X, XI Lot 8, Cone. IX, X
Kaladar ClaimsKaladar Township, Ontario
by D.M. Robertson
Introduction
29 claims covering Concessions IX, X, and XI,
Lots 5, 6, 7 and 8, were staked for Canadian Occidental
Petroleum Ltd., during July, 1977, in Kaladar Township,
Ontario, on ground underlain by part of the Clare River
Syncline. Marbles in this structure are potential host
rocks for zinc deposits of the type characterized by the
Balmat-Edwards district of New York and the Long Lake zinc
mine in neighbouring Frontenac County.
The property is located approximately 2 miles
southeast of the village of Kaladar (see Fig. 2). It can
be reached via a narrow, private track which turns off
Hwy. 41, 4 miles south of Kaladar.
66 sediment samples were taken on October 24 and
25, 1977, from the Otter Creek lakes and analyzed for copper,
lead, zinc and loss on ignition.
The locations of the samples and the values obtained
fromtiiem are shown on Plan 4.
The Otter Creek Lakes are a narrow chain of shallow,o
swampy lakes lying between several low parallel ridges of
outcrop on the northwest side of the claims. Most of the
samples taken were very high in decayed organic matter, wood
(26)
fibre and roots. Drainage through the lakes is slow. The
rocks on the northwest shore are amphibolite, those on the
southeast shore are marbles.
Results
Histograms (Figs. 8 and 9) were drawn for each
metal and for the loss on ignition values. The distribution
for zinc is bi-modal. Cumulative frequency curves (Figs. 10
and 11) were drawn for the non-anomalous populations to
determine mean and probably anomalous levels.
Table 6 gives the range of copper, lead and zinc
values and the anomalous and mean levels. These are compared
with stream sediment and rock chip values obtained by
C.F. Gleeson throughout the Clare River Syncline and with the
values obtained by the G.S.C. from several nearby lakes. The
location of the G.S.C. samples is shown on Figure 12.
The high stream sediment and rock chip values are
all down-stream and down-ice from the Otter Creek Lakes. The
zinc values from the Spry Lake showing are also given.
Copper values in the Otter Creek Lakes range from
13 to 80 ppm with an anomalous level of 50 ppm and a mean of
24 ppm. The highest values are from the uppermost lake in
the chain. These values are not especially high, however,
when considered on a regional scale, these values are higher
than the values obtained by the G.S.C. in surrounding lakes
(21 to 58 ppm) but lower than the stream sediment (3-195 ppm)
and rock chip samples (1-120 ppm) .
a^tf^7fry
\
Zo
X
08 O9
\A\
\ V
o
2 1 C-'
1s
A8tS
OS
vs
\
ot
+y
1enO/ C '
-.1: •
90^0
•"OVO r ii-ix'i 01 X r. . HMM M 'lT O1 n l X f l •••) ,M truv\\ii(n . O ' f, ' .:v.3 *\JTn^' M ; ''l!
fOO
007
l
l or* ^
oo/
(OC)
Table 6
Statistical Summary of Lake Sediment Sample Data
Values in ppm
Range Anomalous Meanai-
Ctter Lake sediments 13-80
Clare River Syncline: stream sediments 3-195rock chips 1-120
G. S.Open
Spry
C. lake sedimentsFile 405 Otter Lake 42
Beatty Lake 30
Shirtcliff Lake 43
Donahue Lake 54
Bruno Lake 58
Lingham Lake south 40
Lingham Lake north 45
Raccoon Lake 21
Lake Showing "B" Soils
Bogs Rock chips
Pb Zn Cu Pb Zn Cu Pb Zn
8-245 15-390 50 100 200 24 48 130
5-160 21-505 61 61 211 12 23 1002-96 4-2600
100 40 280
1 159
10 235
6 245
6 300
8 280
2 144
4 190
4 96
49-510094-40,000
11. 6%
(32)
Lead values ranged from 8 to 245 ppm with an
anomalous level of 100 ppm and a mean of 48 ppm. The 245 ppm
value is from sample L-l taken beside a cottage, and can be
discounted due to contamination. The next highest value of 147
ppm is from the extreme upper end of the lakes There is no
concentration of high lead values. These values are much
higher than the G.S.C. values (1-10 ppm) and are approximately
the same as the stream sediment (5-160 ppm) and rock chip
(2-96 ppm) samples.
Zinc values ranged from 15 to 390 ppm, with an
anomalous level of 200 ppm, and a mean of 130 ppm. The highest
value is again probably due to contamination from the cottage.
There is some concentration of high zinc values in the uppermost
lake and one each in the middle and lower lakes. The G.S.C.
zinc values range from 96 to 300 ppm, which is a higher overall
range. The higher stream sediment (21-505! ppm) and rock
chip values (4-2600 ppm) are a reflection of the mineralization
associated with the Spry Lake sphalerite showing.
Table 6 compares the G.S.C. lake sediment values
obtained from above and below the Spry Lake showing. The
values down ice and down drainage are higher than those up ice
and up drainage (the Otter Creek Lakes area).
Conclusion
The detailed lake sediment sampling did not outlinet
any one particularly anomalous area in the Otter Creek Lakes.
Although there are scattered high values, comparisons with the
G.S.C. lake sediment data and stream sediment and rock chip
samples taken earlier by C.F. Gleeson show that this area has
(33)
Table 7
Comparison of G.S.C. lake sediment values above and below Spry Lake Showing__________' ' ____'
Cu Pb Zn
Lingham Lake north 45Otter Lake 42
Lingham Lake south 40
Racoon Lake average
Donahue Lake Bruno Lake Shirtcliffe Lake
average
4l
190159
144
21
37
545843
2
3
686
96147
300280245
up-ice/up-drainage from showing
down-ice/down- drainage from showing
51 275
generally lower values than the area down-drainage and down-ice
from the Spry Lake zinc showing.
(35)
Summary of Anomalies -
Experience at other zinc showings in Grenville marbles
indicates that 400 ppm zinc in soils is a significant
anomalous level. Zinc values of over 1000 ppm are usually
found within several hundred feet of the showings.
Two significant soil anomalies were found in the claim
area, both over marble. The largest and highest value
anomaly (up to 910 ppm zinc) is off the claims to the north
east. Anomalous lake and pond sediment samples were also
taken here.
Three anomalous samples (up to 735 ppm zinc) were also
obtained from the marble belt between the central beaver
ponds and the Lingham Lakes. Glenshire Mines also obtained
anomalous zinc values in soils from this marble belt, further
to the southwest. Thus it would appear that there is a
favourable horizon for zinc mineralization extending through
this unit. More detailed soil sampling is required in this
area to further delineate the anomaly.
Conclusions and Recommendations
Two soil anomalies with significant zinc values were
located in the claim area. Both lie over marbles. The
largest anomaly is off the claims to the northeast and
appears to be due to glacial dispersion from mineralization
located farther to the north or northeast. The second
anomaly lies over the marble between the central beaver
ponds and the Lingham Lakes. More detailed sampling should
be undertaken to more closely delineate this anomaly.
(36)
Further grid cutting is not recommended at this time
as sufficient topographic control is available for mapping
and soil sampling purposes.
Respectfully submitted,
David M. Robertson B.Se. (Hons.)
June l, 1978
- 37 -
APPENDIX I
LABORATORY GEOCHEMICAL REPORTS
- 38 -
BONDAR-CLEGG S. COMPANY LTD.764 BELFAST ROAD, OTTAWA, ONTARIO, K1G OZ5 PHONE: 237-3110
Geochemical Lab ReportExtraction Cut Pb t Za-HNC^-HCl
A. A.Report No.. 2039-7
Method-
Used. -80 soils
Frnm Canadian Occidental Petroleum
Date Hoveriber l* t_____________ 19 77
SAMPLE NO.
L-l
2
3
1*
5
6
m 7i: 8
910
11
12
13
li*
1 ! 15
16
17
- 18
19
tfA 20
21
22
f. -. 23. . ,21*
t, ' 25
f: ! '\' 26
,,,r '•••.. 27J 28
29
30
31
Cu ppm
31
18
23
21
23
19
18
3126
55
69
60
70
53
27
5551*
15
36
33
3l*
26
10
12
13
31
20
20
28
38
1?
Fbppm
21*5
1*2
1*6
8U
31*
1*9
53
3356
33
1*6
36
58
U7
60
18
22
31*
65
31
7U
85
31
3921*
76
60
60
80
56
12
Zn ppm
390
153
172
200
1*5
129
56
28133
93
128
153
251
155
296
180
168
28
131
26
150
163
62
51*
15
163
110
112
292
196
22
SAMPLE NO.
L- 32
33
3U
35
36
37
38
391*0
1*1
1*2
1*3
1*1*
1*51*6
1*7
1*8
1*9
50
51
52
5351*
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
Cu ppm
15
27
27
33
3
50
61
63
23
25
28
33
17
38171*6
26
38
22
27
15
5
81*9
61
1*9
2532
20
21*
21
Pbppm
8
83
65
701*6
17
20
18
501*0
6881*
1*8
no32
63
100
102
62
77
52
39
33
20
28
23
1*8
83
61*
71*
57
Zn ppm
19
202
ll*0
163
36
156
151
161
58
86
633l*0
125
168119
117
181*
200
11*1*
11*1*
67
32
39
131
168
138
5921*7
81*
159
138
t- -~~ -'
BONDAR-CLEGG a COMPANY LTD.
2039-7Geochemical Lab Report
- — neport NO; —————————— ' "ye "i"- ~
1,1 SAMPLE NO.
fc. 636U
1 6566
; j
,E- 'j.
,. . ,,
5 ™
"" ' ;
9
Cu ppm
1636
18
35
L. O.I
Pb ppm
76128
972k
. resul'
Zn ppm
165213
135
9U
s to fo
SAMPLE NO.
Llow.
Extraction.
: faction Used.
- 40 -
BONDAR-CLEGG S. COMPANY LTD,764 BELFAST ROAD, OTTAWA. ONTARIO. K1B OZ5
Geochemical Lab ReportL.O.I. (1+5000)
FA-AA
-80 soils
Report No..
PHONE: 237-311O
2039-7
From.
nate
Canadian Occidental Petroleua
November .19 TT
i SAMPLE NO.
f Ir-1
l'-' : 2 ——————— ~
k
56
1 A 71 81 i Ql ! 101"' ' u
———————— 12 ——13li*
15
16
IT
18'
l ' 19
Q 20
21
1 : 22
1 - 4 23
l : ' 21** :
M 1 25
26
: ______ *L—i 2 8
29
i ———— 20 —*1
L.O.I.J5T.6
26.8
6H.T
85.9
85.6
8H.9
85. T
8H.3
T9.1
8U.9
78.2
79.38H.9
83.9
8H.8
52.3
53.6
85.2
83.7
81.8
80.H
80.5
13.0
29.3
29.0
76.5
69.2
51.7
8H.3
81.6
*-7
SAMPLE NO.
L- 33
33
3U
35
36
37
38
39to1*1
1*2
1*3
1*1*
1*5
1*6
1*7
1*8
1*9
50
51
52
5351*
5556
5758
5960
61
62
L.O.I. *
2.1
71*. 1
73.8
80.31*.8
65.2
59.5
63,785.5
82.2
77.7
63.1
86.2
I. S.
20.1
02.1*
02.7
65.3
55.3
38.6
31.3
8.6
6.5
57.760.3
59.5
85.5
82.0
76.8
70.7
86.9
BDNDXit A
H ~ ^^
1
f
f
i5.V
i
1
t fTt
f; i.i'
f
i!i
.
•ift
'is- it'
i: i
:if
L-i j"
nepori INO. ———————————
SAMPLE NO.
I/-63
61*
65
66
A
. , . . . ,w——,^^—
'
- 41 -
\R-CLEGG S. COMPAN'
Geochemical Lab ReportPageN
L.O.I.5f
83.9
83.263.2
1*6.5
I. S. I -suffi c: ent ean
-
SAMPLE NO.
pie
Y LTD.
2o. ——————————
fxtraction.i-flethod—
- 42 -
BDNDAR-CLEGG S COMPANY LTD.764 BELFAST ROAD, OTTAWA, ONTARIO, K1B OZ5 PHONE: 237-311O
Geochemical Lab Report____________ Report No. _________203=18-————.———-.——Zn - HN03-HC1
*' .
Section Used. -80 meshFrom —Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd.—
Date April 13,_______________, 9 78
*. ———— ———— ,. ...,
1 SAMPLE NO.J —————————————
|. j K - 30f-l- i -,f;- i 31
1" i 32
f;: i . 33^ —————————— S!* —————————
1; ; 31*
f : 35fcllo: j
jr y1 : 38
i 'i 39*. ty
1*1
i. 1 te1*3
1*1*
^ 1 - 1*5
! i wr i w1*8
A 1*9
goU —— a ——f. i' 52
K - 501
02
03
OH
05
06
OT
08
Znppm
1*8
160
98
27
136
11*3
123
1*6
Tl
66
78
105
208
13l*
160
102
85
103
111*
11*1
11*1*
51
62
81
115
107102
11*9
175
109
60
SAMPLE NO.
K - 509
10
11
12
13
li*
15
16
17
18
19
20
2122
23
21*
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
531*
V - 101
102
W - 01
02
-- an "- 11 r ppm
81*
1*9
1*6
83
103
llH
167
65
102
75
83
11*6
87116
168
115
11*7
68
35ill*
1*0
216
66
5
52
55
337
63
1*8
78
- 43 -
BONDAR-CLEGG S. COMPANY LTD.
Extraction.
iMethod—
7B4 BELFAST ROAD. OTTAWA, ONTARIO, K1G OZ5
Geochemical Lab Report__________________. Report No..—————.
PHONE: S37-311O
/i. A.
i Friction Used -80 mesh
395-78
lang'.Man C'ccidor.tal Petroleum-———^I'ay 19 T\lait&t iQ'J
SAMPLE NO.4.
KCO
. Wr rW v'
OC
37
seC-
!^ coGl
r r-f'3
Wr r.
en^7
i ! C3
^c
i 7071
A 7?73
7/!
75ss* — - ———————
7C
77
78
:r | . 72
noPI82
K3
rpr;:
3C3
S??
3-: 4in?141n^ i j."1
117
icn17 r.
327
81
M*
i rn
143
no23
391
3341
45
in133
7r)
52ft
121
136
150
134
138
227
167
.
SAMPLE NO.
K84
85
86
37
seS?
9091
92
93
94
95
96
97
96
99
100
101
102
103
104
IDS105
107
108
109
nem112
113114
— en ———
ppm
5?
?"?
281
427
no2MV'2
1C:)
74
100
167
1?1
Z61
?6
132
19
510
?50
ion
349
495
242106
75
136
104
.'rIO
380
ICC
5795
J;. . i O-W
f: f^'"
BONDAR-CLEGG- 44 -
COMPANY LTD.
395-78 Geochemical Lab ReportReport No.- Page No.-
f SAMPLE NO.
J:; ; K115
| 116!iF :
\ i 1 17
J: , US
j : 119
l ; 120
1 i 121l ; 128St-
f i 123
f ; 124
pA 125f 1^ 1?G
1: 127
•! 1 ?*
i t ; 1^9-; . ——————————t \ ^
1 i m1 ; 132
1 ^ 1 331 134
135i ;
136
l \ 1 37
i 138
W 139t ! 140
1 : ,-. 141
li ' 142
IT ' M^
I - 1^
i 145146
147
I l 148f ^ 535t1 ! 536E - — . ———————————
znpMri
21
112
C3267
74
81
73117
343
347
399159
5QD127
1B4
?13
r/7512723
392505
313
07
92
361C3
7-35
SO620
200
150775
?rn
68226
134
,
SAMPLE NO.
K- 637
S3C
539
540541
542
543
S44545
546
547548
549
550551
552
553
554555
556
557
553559
560
561
562563
564
565566
567
56B
56C570
571
572
inppn94
130
r,7714244
132
156
?35D4
215
021 35
50
184196
92
no100110
124
186
11692
no58
4272
116
03180
370
335
88A?.
130
02
- 45 -
BONDAR-CLEGG S. COMPANY LTD,
Report No.-395-78 Geochemical Lab Report
Page No.-
'ST
t'i'i F
;i;ii-
fc|'j-
t:
i|.
f
lV '
*...
Sr,
1i'
ttfBt:
f
f
!
l
i';
^
k 1
ii
f.
!K
i j! ;;
, i'.i! r-)
i i \ i?"IF-
SAMPLE NO.
K-D73
574575
57C
577573
570
b80
581
582^ 5S3
^ 5S4
6855PC
587
588
5*?
590
591
592599
5945*5
596
A 597
598
59?600
, — -^ — — -—
W- 3
i 4
06
7
89
10
/-li
HPP
112431?4
1PC
270325
5nD
320
128
68135
1?2
470146
1?0
260
130470
205
607G
1461.55
527
215
•110
340775
PO
200
1S4r.?nl"fAO84
480
SAMPLE NO.
w-ii12
13
—— 711 ———
Pflffl
W
46
14C
f^
- 46 -
BONDAR-CLEGG S. COMPANY LTD.
Extraction.
traction Used .
764 BELFAST ROAD, OTTAWA, ONTARIO, K1Q OZ5
Geochemical Lab Report————————. Report No. _______
_______- From Can&diai
________ Date——^^———-—Majt
PHONE: 237-311O
7.n -
A.A.
-100 nosh
39^-78
a
19 78
1 i SAMPLE NO.
t i A - 1f j . 2
3
MA):;i ;
MB)
f' ' 5
A *"* T
8it-'
j ^ 9I, | 10
1 i nU 12
r i 13t i H*t- -f"; ; 15
16•. : ITt ! 18A 19
In 20i ' - 211, ————————f'; ! 22r 55-^ —
2l|
r i 25j 1 . 26
r Wiiiil : ' !
gu j
I;-
i!
— m —— ppn
8
1*0
27
10
k
12
8
9
20
8
1*0
28
19
35
8
18
138
n16
18
18li*
10
10
530
3'vO
52
9
REMARKS
- 47 -
; |-gG BONDAR-CLEGG SL COMPANY LTD.
i w*"' B.- ' i -Sr 'f
Extraction .
IMftthori.
Fraction Used
b764 BELFAST
Zn-HN03-HCl
A. A.
-80 mesh
ROAD, OTTAWA, ONTARIO, K1G OZ5 PHONE: S37-311O
Geochemical Lab ReportReport No **35-78
c Canadian OccidentalFrom
May 23
Petroleum Limited
, 9 78f; , - 7.n IT-
1 SAMPLE NO.
(1 K-ll*9
ti ' 150
1' 151
152
153
151*
4ft 155T' 156
15T
1 158
159
160
161
162
163
161*165
166
1 16T
i4ft l681 169
170
1 _ 171
l 172 ~
1 173
f 171*
j ; 175
j - l 176
1 : 1771 ——————————— t i 1781 ——————————— l l 179
ppm
152
1*79
156
76
359
269
62777
161
135
196
125
215
2^7
165
82122
22k
318
309
186
138
111
135
U6
76
1*2
122
163
80
6k
SAMPLE NO.
K-180
181
182
183
18U
185186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
19U
195196
197
198
199
200201
202
203
20U
205
206
207
208
209
210
ppm
311
296
76
80
159
60373
96
169
182
391
159
111
183
186
12056
60
109
600
90122
92
1(2
lOfc
109
76
6U
735
31*
178
BONDAR-CLEGG- 48 -COMPANY LTD,
^• n ., 1*35-78s ••:^F Report No: ———————————
SAMPLE NO.
K-2U
212
213
2lU
215
1 216
217
218
219
220
222
22^
22U
225
226
227
228
229230
231
j 232
233231*
^ 235
236
1 ; 2^7
l 238
239
2l*0
21*1
21*2
21*3
9l,h
2l*5
21*6
Page N
2Jn ppm
8U
362T
101*
18
9062
130
176
122
57
ll*8
90126
69
71*
ll*8
106211*011*5
30
122
ni*152
111*
150
100
81*
12l*
116
150
70
6?98
38
SAMPLE NO.
K-2l*7
2l*82l*9
250
251
252253
251*
255256
257
258259
260
V-lfc
15
16
17
1819
20A
SOB
21
22
23
21*
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Two samp Les W-21
A 81
2o. ——————————
MuTl
ppm
1*1
6681
1*8
60
198119
1*6
6655
193
12176
32
5696
52
260
9672
232
2l*5ll*8
76
158
58
65
18
1*1*
110
22
21
186
receii
fl B by
edidesif
Bondar-(
aated
legg.
- 49 -
BONDAR-CLEGG SL COMPANY LTD.7B4 BELFAST ROAD. OTTAWA. ONTARIO. K1G OZ5 PHONE; 237-3110
Geochemical Lab Report
t Zn-HNO,-HCl (traction vA. A. ethod . .
Report N
From Cj
436-780,
inadlan Occidental Petroleum Limited
1 '. ,, A - 100 mesh n t Ma) 23, 1 Q 78fraction Used . Date ' ., . , 19
l SAMPLE NO.
/\-28
29
30
31
32
33
A *"^ 35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
.^ 47
48
^ 50r -53
54
55
,, i
inppm
116
8
10
15
51
14
63
16
12
15
22
75
22
10
38
18
21
9
36
14
77
10
6
150
9
59
8
no
REMARKS
\l \rft*t
" ;; ""
GEOP2.2727 KALADAR 900
TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT
TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION. CONCLUSIONS ETC.J
Type of Survey(s) GEOLOGICAL AND GEOCHEMICAL________Township or Area KALADAR TwP.——————^——————————Claim Holder( s ) CANADIAN OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM LTD.
Survey Company CANADIAN OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM LTD. Author of Report _D. M. Robertson__^______^_______Address of Author 311 - 215 Carllngview Dr., Rexdale, Ont.Covering Dates of Survey April 7 - May 12. 1978_________
(linecutting to office)
Total Miles of Line Cut 25________________________
SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED
ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.
ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.
Geophysical
—Electromagnetic.
—Magnetometer-—
—Radiometric__
—Other-.————
DAYS per claim
Geological. 40
Geochemical. 20AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne surveys)
Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic. . Radiometric(enter days per claim)
DATE: June 27, 1978 SIGNATURE:.thor of Report or Agent
Res. Gcol.. .QualificationsPrevious Surveys
File No. Type Date
-D.
Claim Holder
MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically
See attached list(prefix) (number)
l
TOTAL CLAIMS. 29
GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA
GROUND SURVEYS) If more than one survey, specify data for eacli type of survey
Number of Stations.
Station interval ——
Profile scale ————
.Number of Readings
.Line spacing ————
Contour interval.
9H W ZO
Instrument
Accuracy — Scale constant.
Diurnal correction method.
Base Station check-in interval (hours).
Base Station location and value ____
ELECTROMAGNETIC
Instrument
flnil rnnfignration
flnil separation
Arnirary
Method: C] Fixed transmitter D Shoot back D In lineFrpqiipnry
(specify V.L.F. station)
O Parallel line
Parameters measured.
>
o!
Instrument.
Scale constant .—
Corrections made.
Base station value and location .
Elevation accuracy-
l SNhH
Xp*Hq
2Q WuDa •z
tf)
Di
Instrument ————.—.——.
Method D Time Domain
Parameters — On time .^——
- O ff time ..—.
D Frequency Domain
_ Frequency _____
_ Range ^-————,.— Delay time —--—
— Integration time.
Power.Electrode array — Electrode spacing .
Type of electrode
GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD
Numbers of claims from which samples taken. 29
Total Number of Samples- Type of Sample Soil. Lake silt. Bog. Rock
{Nature of Material)
Average Sample Weight. 50 SITU————————— Method of Cniipriinn Shovel. Lake Bottom
Sampler and HammerSoil Horizon Sampled-
Horizon Development- Sample Depth—————
'B". A.B.C in soil pits Poor^^_^_^____ 6" - 10"_________
Low, Gently Rolling, Well wooded
Drainage Dpyplnprnrnt Ext.ensivp Reaypr
Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness _____ Q - 25 feet ^^__^^
SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)
Mesh size of fraction used for analysis____ _____-80, -TOO For Rocks-—————.
ANALYTICAL METHODSValues expressed in: per cent
p.p. m. p. p. b.
D BJD
Ku^^bj)(Zrg Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As,-(circle)
Others————————————-——-————^—-—.Field Analysis (. .tests)
Extraction Method.
Analytical Method- Reagents Used__
Field Laboratory AnalysisNo. -—------—--—- .tests)
Extraction Method.
Analytical Method -
Reagents Used ——
Commercial Laboratory (_____O^l_____tests) Name of Laboratory Bondar-Clcgg Co. Ltd.
M11 rt H f* IExtraction MfthnH MINUg " nui.________
Analytical Method. "'"*———^-^-^-^^—--
Reagents Used _____________________
General- General
SELF POTENTIAL
Instrument_________________________________________ Range.Survey Method .——-—^——-—-^^—————-—^———^--————————————^.^^^
Corrections made.
RADIOMETK1C
Instrument.Values measured.
Energy windows (levels)_____________________________________- Height of instrument.——————————-—-^^^—————^——Background Count.Size of detector—-^————-—————..—.—-————^^——..-——.——^—————Overburden ——————^——————^—^^^-^—————^^——-^——^^——^—^^
(type, depth — include outcrop map)
OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING E'J'C.)
Type of survey———.—————————^—^———————Instrument ___^_^_________^^__^_Accuracy_____^___^__________^^_^__
Parameters measured.
Additional information (for understanding results).
AIRBORNE SURV.KYS
Type of survey(s) ———
Instrument(s) —————(specify for each type of survey)
Accuracy-^————-^—————^-^(specify for each type of survey)
Aircraft used———————^——.—^————-.————^^—.—Sensor altitude.Navigation and flight path recovery method.
Aircraft altitude^—^—————^————-———.^^^^——.————Line Sparing Miles flown over total area________________________Over claims only.
O) 00
Q. S
LJ
Anglesea Twp. (M.43 ) Barrie Twp. (M.50)
Deerock Lake(Rock Lake)
30 ReforestationWithdrawn
from-~fiL-J-
Reserved
for Reforestation
l_____..,
^ — . l 491914
-+91920 491923 L. — - — — — -
RESERVE TReservedfor
Reforestation
503957 ' 503954
50395B ,503956
S. R.O,Reserved
for Public Use
CD O
QL
Oo;-Q CDCc:Q)
Hungerford Twp. (M. 105) Sheffield Twp. (M.150 )
J.Rv
THE-TOWNSHIP
OF
KALADARCOUNTY OF
LENNOX S. ADDINGTON
EASTERN ONTARIO MINING DIVISION
SCALE* 1-INCH = 40 CHAINS
LEGENDPATENTED LAND CROWN LAND SALE
LEASES LOCATED LAND
LICENSE OF OCCUPATIONMINING RIGHTS ONLYSURFACE RIGHTS ONLYROADSIMPROVED ROADSKINGS HIGHWAYSRAILWAYSPOWER LINESMARSH OR MUSKEGMINESCANCELLED PATENTED S.R.O.
C.S.
Loc.L.O.
M.RO. S. R.O.
C.
NOTES
400' surface rights reservation along t he s hores of all lakes and r ivers.
Original shoreline shown thus:
F R. l. shoreline shown thus:
This Map Is Not To Be Used - FOR SURVEY PURPOSES—
AREAS WITHDRAWN FROM STAKING, - SURFACE RIGHTS M.R.-MINING RIGHTS
Section____Order No.___Dofe DisPostion File42 !R SO I960) 42(R,S.OI960)
SR.SMR 3053 S R. 37760
SAND and GRAVEL
© M.MR Grovel Reserve No. 240, Grovel File 45432
31CI1NEefc25 2.2727 KALADAR 200
PLAN NO.-M.I08ONTARIO
MINISTRY OF N ATURAL R ESOURCESSURVEYS AND MAPPING BRANCH
NOT MA
MAPPEDNOT
MINERALIZATION
Geological boundary
Bedding or banding
Foliation
A//VA/ Fault
Cut and picketed line36 i
^1 ( 2l
PRECAMBRIAN
Pegmatite dikesQuartz monzonite
-intrusive contact -
GRENVILLE SERIES GROUP Hornblende (biotite) feldspar gneiss Biotite or muscovite schist
Marble
py Pyrite
trem Tremolite
lim Limonite
phlog Phlogopite
qtz Quartz veins
CANADIAN OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM LTDMINERALS DIVISION
KALADAR CLAIMSPROJECT GRENTARIO KALADAR TR ONT.
N T.S. - 31 C/ll
/o. O Quartz - feldspar - biotite - gneiss Ib (ffi] Biotite -quartz- feldspar-gneiss
a
—— —— — TrackV" -*
-f^J Cedar swamp
i ..-.-i—.- claim post
GEOLOGY
SCALE l =400
MAY 1978Beaver dam
J-J7j y31C11NE0C25 2 .2727 KALADAR
LEGEND
P b __ Zn
Cu Sample No
ANOMALOUS
>IOOM—m. >200
CANADIAN OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM LTDMINERALS DIVISION
PROJECT GRENTARIOPROBABLY ANOMALOUS
>I9^KALADAR TP , O NTARIO
N.T.S. 31C/11
LAKE SEDIMENT SAMPLE LOCATIONS AND MET
May 1976
31CIINEee25 2 .2727 KALADAR 220
LEGEND
B HORIZON SOIL SAMPLESANOMALOUS
CANADIAN OCCIDENTAL P ETROLEUM LTD.MINERALS DIVISION
KALADAR CLAIMSPROJECT GRENTARIO KALADAR TP ONT.POND AND STREAM SEDIMENTS SAMPLES
ANOMALOUS
B HORIZON SOIL, BOG AND ROCKGEOCHEMISTRY
SAMPLE LOCATIONS AND ZINC VAROCK CHIP SAMPLESPPM
Sample No.
.-—— 4X4 Track
31C11NE8925 2.2727 KALADAR 230
ZINC CONTOURS IN PPM
CANADIAN OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM LTD,MINERALS DIVISION
KALADAR CLAIMSPROJECT GRENTARIO KALADAR TR ONT.
N.T.S. - 31 C/ll
ZINC CONTOURS
'B' HORIZON SOILS
SCALE l =400
MAY 1978
2.2727 KALADAR 240