Generalized conversational
-
Upload
adriana-rodriguez -
Category
Business
-
view
128 -
download
4
Transcript of Generalized conversational
![Page 1: Generalized conversational](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081504/557f8e76d8b42a2f198b4976/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
JOHN GARCIALINA RESTREPO
![Page 2: Generalized conversational](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081504/557f8e76d8b42a2f198b4976/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
When no special knowledge is required in the context to calculate additional conveyed meaning.
Any phrase with an indefinite article of the type “a/ an”
![Page 3: Generalized conversational](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081504/557f8e76d8b42a2f198b4976/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
I was sitting in a garden one day. A child looked over the fence.
The Implicatures Calculate if the speaker was capable of being more specific, more informative.
![Page 4: Generalized conversational](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081504/557f8e76d8b42a2f198b4976/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
In terms, for expressing quantity, certain information is always communicated by choosing a word which expresses one value from a scale of values.
All, most, many, some, few. Always, often, sometimes.
![Page 5: Generalized conversational](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081504/557f8e76d8b42a2f198b4976/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
When producing a expression, a speakers selects the word from the scale which is the most informative and truthful (quality and quantity) in the circumstances, as in.
I am studying linguistics and I´ve completed some of the required courses.
Not most, not many.
![Page 6: Generalized conversational](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081504/557f8e76d8b42a2f198b4976/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
There are many scalar implicatures produced by the use of expressions that we may not immediately consider to be a part of any scale.
It´s is possible that they were delayed.
Not certain.
This should be stored in a cool place. Not must.
![Page 7: Generalized conversational](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081504/557f8e76d8b42a2f198b4976/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
One noticeable feature of scalar implicatures is that when speakers correct themselves on some detail, as in they typically cancel one of the scalar implicatures.
I got some of this jewerly in Hong Kong. Um actually
I think I got most of it there.
Not most and still to be interpreted with a scalar, Not All.
![Page 8: Generalized conversational](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081504/557f8e76d8b42a2f198b4976/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
A particularized conversational implicature is one which depends
on particular features of the context.
![Page 9: Generalized conversational](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081504/557f8e76d8b42a2f198b4976/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Rich: Hey, coming to he wild party tonight?
Tom: my parents are visiting.
Our conversations take place in very specific contexts in which locally recognized inferences are assumed.
![Page 10: Generalized conversational](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081504/557f8e76d8b42a2f198b4976/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Ann: Where are you going with the dog?
Sam: To the V-E-T.
The speakers appears not to adhere to (to flout) the maxim of manner
![Page 11: Generalized conversational](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081504/557f8e76d8b42a2f198b4976/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Leila: Whoa!! Has your boss gone crazy?
Mary: Let`s go get some coffe.
( non-relevant remark)
![Page 12: Generalized conversational](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081504/557f8e76d8b42a2f198b4976/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Bert: Do vegetarians eat hamburguers?
Ernie:Do chicken have lips?
The response initially appear to flout relevance
![Page 13: Generalized conversational](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081504/557f8e76d8b42a2f198b4976/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
The implicatures are part of what is communicated and not said. ( the speakers can deny).
“Conversational implicatures are deniable.”
We hear the utterances and attempt to maintain the asumption of
cooperative interaction.
![Page 14: Generalized conversational](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022081504/557f8e76d8b42a2f198b4976/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
The conversational implicatures: can be calculated, suspended, cancelled and reinforced.
You have won five dollars! (only five) You`ve won at least five dollars!. You`ve won five dollars, in fact, you`ve
won ten!. You`ve won five dollars, that`s four
more than one!.