General Norm Change Emil Weydert and Richard Booth Individual and Collective Reasoning Group...

16
General Norm Change Emil Weydert and Richard Booth Individual and Collective Reasoning Group University of Luxembourg

Transcript of General Norm Change Emil Weydert and Richard Booth Individual and Collective Reasoning Group...

Page 1: General Norm Change Emil Weydert and Richard Booth Individual and Collective Reasoning Group University of Luxembourg.

General Norm Change

Emil Weydert and Richard BoothIndividual and Collective Reasoning Group

University of Luxembourg

Page 2: General Norm Change Emil Weydert and Richard Booth Individual and Collective Reasoning Group University of Luxembourg.

Outline of talk

• The problem of Norm Revision• Basic concepts• Normative states• Basic revision requirements• A first method

Page 3: General Norm Change Emil Weydert and Richard Booth Individual and Collective Reasoning Group University of Luxembourg.

The Problem

• normative state + new norms = ??

– What is a normative state?

– How to revise it?

– Revision first, contraction later

Page 4: General Norm Change Emil Weydert and Richard Booth Individual and Collective Reasoning Group University of Luxembourg.

The Basic Concepts

• L is some language closed under usual prop. connectives.

• A norm is a conditional with L– “if holds then should hold”

• A set of norms can be coherent or incoherent• Any set of norms induces (conditional)

obligations

Page 5: General Norm Change Emil Weydert and Richard Booth Individual and Collective Reasoning Group University of Luxembourg.

Normative States: Ingredients

• Different types of priority between norms:– Temporal (order of introduction)– Commitment (active/inactive)– Explicit (authority)– Implicit (specificity-like)

• We consider only first 2 for now

Page 6: General Norm Change Emil Weydert and Richard Booth Individual and Collective Reasoning Group University of Luxembourg.

Normative States

• A normative state N is of the form

– is a prior set of norms– is the sequence of revision inputs

received thus far– is the set of currently active norms– Obligation is induced by N iff it’s induced by

Page 7: General Norm Change Emil Weydert and Richard Booth Individual and Collective Reasoning Group University of Luxembourg.

Minimal Requirements on X

• is coherent• • if

– Not necessarily for all i – If N = then not necessarily

Page 8: General Norm Change Emil Weydert and Richard Booth Individual and Collective Reasoning Group University of Luxembourg.

The Revision Problem• Given:

– normative state N and coherent norm-set

• Want:– new normative state N

• N = for some new set of active norms • Question: What is ?

Page 9: General Norm Change Emil Weydert and Richard Booth Individual and Collective Reasoning Group University of Luxembourg.

Basic Postulates for X’

• By definition of normative state, we must have:– is coherent– (Success)

• Might also expect:– If is coherent then (Conservativeness)

• More?...

Page 10: General Norm Change Emil Weydert and Richard Booth Individual and Collective Reasoning Group University of Luxembourg.

A First Method: Some Notation

• Given normative state N = let for i = 0,…,n

• Given 2 norm-sets , set is the family of norm-sets s.t.1) is coherent2) If then is incoherent

Page 11: General Norm Change Emil Weydert and Richard Booth Individual and Collective Reasoning Group University of Luxembourg.

A First Method

Construct iteratively• Start with • Then for i = n,….,0

– If then – else

Page 12: General Norm Change Emil Weydert and Richard Booth Individual and Collective Reasoning Group University of Luxembourg.

A First Method: Simple Examples

• Examples use a specific definition of “coherence”:– is coherent iff there is no s.t. and can be derived from in System P

Page 13: General Norm Change Emil Weydert and Richard Booth Individual and Collective Reasoning Group University of Luxembourg.

Example 1

• N = , where:

• Suppose• Then

Page 14: General Norm Change Emil Weydert and Richard Booth Individual and Collective Reasoning Group University of Luxembourg.

Example 2

• N = , where:

• Suppose• Then

Page 15: General Norm Change Emil Weydert and Richard Booth Individual and Collective Reasoning Group University of Luxembourg.

Conclusion

• Preliminary framework for Norm Revision• Incorporates temporal and “commitment”

(active/inactive) priorities• Give first method based on maximal coherent

sets, giving active norms “privilege”• Ongoing work….

Page 16: General Norm Change Emil Weydert and Richard Booth Individual and Collective Reasoning Group University of Luxembourg.

Norm Change Workshop participants are warmly invited to:

JANUARY 29……SUBMISSION DEADLINE JANUARY 29…….SUBMISSION DEADLINE JANUA