Gender disparities in refugee contexts: Case studies using health indicators
description
Transcript of Gender disparities in refugee contexts: Case studies using health indicators
![Page 1: Gender disparities in refugee contexts: Case studies using health indicators](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813afb550346895da38b85/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Gender disparities in refugee contexts: Case studies using health indicators
Khassoum DialloSenior StatisticianUNHCR
Global Forum on Gender Statistics, Manila 11-13 October, 2010
ESA/STAT/AC.219/20
![Page 2: Gender disparities in refugee contexts: Case studies using health indicators](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813afb550346895da38b85/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
SCOPE OF FORCED DISPLACEMENT
Forcibly displaced persons Forcibly displaced persons represent a significant share of represent a significant share of the de facto population of many the de facto population of many countriescountries
Refugees and Asylum-seekers ~ Refugees and Asylum-seekers ~ 16 million end-2009. Internally 16 million end-2009. Internally Displaced People (27 million)Displaced People (27 million)
Daddab refugee camp (300,000 Daddab refugee camp (300,000 people): 4th city of Kenya does people): 4th city of Kenya does not appear in any official not appear in any official statistics or map of Kenyastatistics or map of Kenya
In many countries, In many countries, MDGs or MDGs or other international goals other international goals cannot cannot be achieved without addressingbe achieved without addressing the needs of populations affected the needs of populations affected by conflicts and emergencies, by conflicts and emergencies, especially women and childrenespecially women and children
Share of displaced population vs total population, end 2009
12%
10%
8%
5%
0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12%
Afghanistan
Colombia
Jordan
Syria
2
![Page 3: Gender disparities in refugee contexts: Case studies using health indicators](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813afb550346895da38b85/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Demographic patterns
Increasing share of urban refugees (close to 60% in 2009
Between 70-90% of refugees remain in their region of origin
Age & sex distribution
0-4yrs 5-11yrs 12-17yrs 18-59yrs 60yrs+ 0-4yrs 5-11yrs 12-17yrs 18-59yrs 60yrs+
R+AS 5% 9% 7% 24% 2% 5% 10% 8% 27% 2%
IDPs 5% 9% 7% 26% 3% 5% 10% 7% 26% 3%
RET 9% 12% 7% 19% 2% 9% 13% 8% 19% 2%
RDP 11% 13% 6% 25% 1% 10% 10% 6% 17% 1%
Female Male
Category
3
![Page 4: Gender disparities in refugee contexts: Case studies using health indicators](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813afb550346895da38b85/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Data Sources & methods UNHCR’s Health Information System The Standards and Indicators Programme (over
100 countries, by location) Participatory assessments (over 120 countries, at
least once every year) Routine registration and monitoring system from
Governments & other partners Mix of sources (surveys, censuses, estimation
methods etc.) Data quality assessment and triangulation
4
![Page 5: Gender disparities in refugee contexts: Case studies using health indicators](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813afb550346895da38b85/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Health Information System
Core health topics: Mortality, morbidity, RH, Nutrition, Access to services 5
![Page 6: Gender disparities in refugee contexts: Case studies using health indicators](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813afb550346895da38b85/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Relationships
Conflict Displacement Health
Gender related issues: Women, men, boys and girls impacted differently
• Gender based violence (e.g. rape, domestic violence)
• Reproductive/including maternal health
• Access to health services
6
![Page 7: Gender disparities in refugee contexts: Case studies using health indicators](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813afb550346895da38b85/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Analyses/ Presentation Methods
Gap and Trends analyses Scorecards Indices: Composite indices,
including the gender parity index
7
![Page 8: Gender disparities in refugee contexts: Case studies using health indicators](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813afb550346895da38b85/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Illustration using selected indicators
Access to services Women’s empowerment Gender based violence HIV Testing and Counseling
8
![Page 9: Gender disparities in refugee contexts: Case studies using health indicators](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813afb550346895da38b85/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Access and use of health facilities
% of deliveries at health centers, 2009
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Bangladesh
Burundi
Cameroon
Chad
Djibouti
Ethiopia
Kenya
Nepal
Rw anda
Sudan
Tanzania
Thailand
Uganda
Yemen
Zambia
9
![Page 10: Gender disparities in refugee contexts: Case studies using health indicators](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813afb550346895da38b85/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Women’s participation in decision making
Percentage of camps which meet the standard of minimum 50% female members in food distribution committees
Camp Indicator
Standard almost met45-50% involved in
distribution are w omen
Standard MetMore than 50% involved in
distribution are w omen
Standard not metLess than 45% involved in
distribution are w omen
10
![Page 11: Gender disparities in refugee contexts: Case studies using health indicators](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813afb550346895da38b85/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
VCT: Tested for HIVVCT: Tested for HIV refugees > 18 years
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
% b
y se
x
female
male
11
![Page 12: Gender disparities in refugee contexts: Case studies using health indicators](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813afb550346895da38b85/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Measuring performance in health
CRITERIA % of Camps
STANDARD ALMOST MET NOT MET
INDICATOR - CAMP No. of camps
% Standard Met
% Standa
rd almost
met
% Standar
d not met
Yes No Does your office have a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for SGBV? 89 92% 8%
100% 90-99% <90% Percentage of SGBV cases who received support (DP) 75 88% 3% 9%
100% 90-99% <90% Percentage of SGBV cases <18 years old who received support (DP) 64 97% 2% 2%
Min 10% 7-10% <7% Percentage of asylum-seekers / refugees who participated in SGBV training 90 23% 6% 71%
Min 10% 7-10% <7% Percentage of UNHCR and partner staff who have completed SGBV training 81 77% 1% 22%
100% 90-99% <90% Percentage of food beneficiaries entitled to food who received food during latest food distribution 82 71% 23% 6%
Min 2,100 2,001-2,001 <2,000 Average number of kilocalories available per person per day 84 48% 6% 46%
Min 50% 45-49% <45% Percentage of female members in food distribution committees 76 68% 4% 28% Max 10,000 10,001-12,000 >12000 No. of persons per primary health care facility 138 52% 7% 41%
Min 50% 40-49% <40% Percentage of live births attended by skilled personnel (excl. TBAs) 128 62% 2% 36%
Max 15% 15-20% >20% Percentage of newborn children with low birth weight (< 2500 gs) (weighed within 72 hrs) 122 97% 1% 2%
Min 90% 80-89% <80% Measles vaccination coverage 95 64% 17% 19% No Yes Have stocks of condoms run out for more than a week? 90 69% 31%
Min 20 L. 18-19 L <18 L Average quantity of water available per person per day (litres) 103 57% 9% 34% Max 80 81-100 >100 No. of persons per usable water tap 82 52% 12% 35%
Max 200 201-250 >250 No. of persons per usable well/hand pump 59 51% 7% 42%
100% 90-99% <90% Percentage of pop. living within 200 m from water point 98 55% 11% 34%
12
![Page 13: Gender disparities in refugee contexts: Case studies using health indicators](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813afb550346895da38b85/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Gender Parity Index (GPI)
Gender parity index (GPI) 2009 (Ordered)
Indicator
Female Denominat
orFemale
NumeratorFemale
Indicator
Male Denominat
orMale
NumeratorMale
Indicator
GPI(Gender
Parity Index F/M)
Percentage of UNHCR and partner staff w ho have completed SGBV training (RET) 678 400 59.0% 1,160 435 37.5% 1.57Percentage of UNHCR and partner staff w ho have completed SGBV training (CMP) 2,981 799 26.8% 6,577 1,528 23.2% 1.15
Percentage of SGBV cases w ho received support (URB) 2,190 1,733 79.1% 147 110 74.8% 1.06
Percentage of SGBV cases w ho received support (RET) 682 542 79.5% 69 68 98.6% 0.81
GPI Definition Ratio of female to male values of a given indicator. A GPI of 1 indicates parity between sexes.
The gender parity index (GPI): ratio between the female and the male rates (F/M), where: GPI below 1 means disparity in favor of boys/men GPI = 1 means parity (the male and female indicators are equal) GPI above 1 means disparity in favor of girls or
13
![Page 14: Gender disparities in refugee contexts: Case studies using health indicators](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062314/56813afb550346895da38b85/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
In conclusion: Lessons learnt from gender analyses
Gender disparities remain high for many health-related indicators in a number of refugee contexts
Difficult to analyze most of maternal health indicators from a gender perspective
Data collection and quality remain a challenge
Post analysis phase: translation of findings
14