GEMMA RAURET DALMAU Directora ANECA
description
Transcript of GEMMA RAURET DALMAU Directora ANECA
GEMMA RAURET DALMAU
Directora ANECA
Regional developments and implementation in the regional networks of the UNESCO-OECD
Guidelines – lessons learned. The case of RIACES
QUALITY ASSURANCE IN TRANSNATIONAL EDUCATION (tne) – From words to action
Bologna Seminar organised by ENQA and hosted by QAA
London, 1-2 December 2008
The setting and the scenarios
Transnational QA criteria and guidelines at the
subregional level
RIACES: perspectives for QA enhancement for agencies: CINTAS project
ÍndiceÍndice
Different academic flows
intra- and inter-subregions:
South-America
Central-America
Andean Area
North-America
Europe
Latin-America: the setting and the scenarios
Members of RIACES
*Source: RIACES (www.riaces.net)
Different multilateral initiatives to shape a political integrity at the regional and trans-regional level:
POLITICAL WILL TOWARDS QA AND ACCREDITATION OF HE
Ibero-American Summits. Organización de Estados Iberoamericanos (OEI).
The building of the Ibero-American Knowledge Area. Principles:
-Gradual implementation-Flexibility-Priorisation of measures-Articulation of policies-Quality assurance-Corresponsibility-Solidarity-Mutual benefit
Latin-America: the setting and the scenarios
17th Ibero-American Summit, Chile 2007: Student Mobility Programme “Pablo Neruda”.Enhancing co-operation and integration focusing on student mobility at the postgraduate level
Various solutions to face QA provision in trans-border HE:
-OECD-UNESCO Guidelines for Quality Provision in Cross-Border Higher Education: CONEAU, Argentina – 2007. Co-ordination: IESALC-UNESCO
INQAAHE Guidelines of Good Practice in Quality Assurance:CNAP, Chile - 2006. Co-ordination: INQAAHE
European Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance of Higher Education: ANECA, Spain – 2007. Co-ordination: ENQA
Latin-America: the setting and the scenarios
Stages for the definition of QA mechanisms and practices involved in evaluation and accreditation processes*
REGIONAL SCHEMES
Networks of agencies
RIACES – Ibero-American Network of Accreditation Agencies
Harmonisation and convergence of evaluation standards
Requirements for the harmonisation and convergence of expert training
International review of agencies
MEXA 2002- (Experimental Programme Accreditation Mechanism for Bachelor Degrees Recognition within the MERCOSUR countries plus Bolivia and Chile)RANA – 2007 (National Accreditation Agencies Network)
Central-America: CCA Accreditation Agency accrediting QA-agencies at the sub-regional level
Latin-America: the setting and the scenarios
*Source: Ernesto Villanueva, CONEAU (2007)
Features:Association of QA and accreditation agencies for HEIndependent of governments
Goals:Promoting Ibero-American co-operation and exchange of good-practices on QA and accreditation of HEPromoting QA enhancement in the countries
Strategic trends of the network:Strengthening the role played by agencies within the networkDeveloping QA mechanisms at the regional levelEstablishing a regional information officeDeveloping the technical profile of the staff throughDeveloping the technical training for evaluators
RIACES as a reference framework: the manual for self-evaluation of agencies
To provide with basic elements for designing and conducting self-evaluation procedures to the evaluation and accreditation agencies
To establish the reference framework –the evaluation standards– for the development of self-evaluation procedures
To provide with a minimum structure to elaborate a self-evaluation report to the agency, as well as support information for the process
To prepare basic orientations towards the external review of the agency including the procedure, standards and central features of the review of the international panel and the preparation of the final report
MERCOSUR* http://www.mercosur.int/MSWEB/portal%20intermediario/ES/index.htm
MEXA- (Experimental Programme Accreditation Mechanism for the Recognition of Bachelor Degrees within the MERCOSUR countries plus Bolivia and Chile)
RANA – 2007 (National Accreditation Agencies Network)
• Agencies advanced in the convergence of evaluation standards through an effort towards harmonization of the evaluation processes in the area.
• Accreditation is based upon a set of quality standards shared by the countries involved.
• Accreditation is programme-oriented and focuses on graduate mobility.
• This project has been possible because a three-fold legitimating process which involves: governments, agencies and disciplines.
*Source: Ernesto Villanueva, CONEAU (2007)
Transnational QA criteria and guidelines at the subregional level
Central-American Accreditation Council (CCA)
Mission:
• To contribute to the on-going quality, relevance and integration of Central-American Higher Education through accreditation, the formal recognition of organisations for accrediting either institutions or programmes in every country or at the regional level.
• The CCA has been recognised by the Ministers of Education of the eight countries, acting as a full-competence and supranational body responsible for accrediting agencies.
• The recognition body at the subregional lies on the Central-American Integration Secretariat (SICA).
*Source: Ernesto Villanueva, CONEAU (2007)
Transnational QA criteria and guidelines at the subregional level
QA enhancement for agencies: the CINTAS project
The CINTAS project was designed by ANECA for
RIACES. It focuses on the development of Internal
Quality Assurance Systems of the agencies.
Objectives
Supporting the QA / accreditation agencies in
developing their own procedures of internal quality internal quality
assurance systems.assurance systems.
Building a shared reference frameworkreference framework for quality
assurance to be used within the RIACES context.
Objectives
Supporting the QA / accreditation agencies in
developing their own procedures of internal quality internal quality
assurance systems.assurance systems.
Building a shared reference frameworkreference framework for quality
assurance to be used within the RIACES context.
CINTAS Project
Marco normativo de Marco normativo de cada pacada paííss
Mecanismos existentes Mecanismos existentes de garantde garantíía interna de a interna de calidad de las agenciascalidad de las agencias
Recomendaciones y Recomendaciones y experiencias de experiencias de
garantgarantíía de calidad a de calidad internacionalesinternacionales
Sistema de Garantía Interna de la Calidad de las AGENCIAS
Proyecto de Calidad Interna de las Agencias de
Evaluación
CINTASCINTAS
RIACES GuidelinesRIACES Guidelines
Internal quality assurance Systems of the agencies
Recommendations and Recommendations and internationalinternationalexperiences experiences
On quality assuranceOn quality assurance
QA enhancement for agencies: the CINTAS project
National legal framework
Internal Quality
Assurance Project
of agencies
CINTAS
CINTAS Steering Group:
ANECA, Spain
CNA, Colombia
CONEAU, Argentina
JAN, Cuba
Flow-chart of the Project
RIACES Board of Directors approves the proposal of the project
RIACES General Assembly (Montevideo, 2007) approves implementing the project and entrusts ANECA the design of the project
ANECA designs the project and the Manual for the Internal Quality Assurance System
RIACES’ Board of Directors approves CINTAS project (Madrid June 2007)
CINTAS Commission is set up and defines the stages of the project (Bogotá Nov. 2007)
The project is submitted/Participation commitment of the agencies
Training Seminars- workshops
Support and follow-up actions the implementation of IQAS
The participating agencies prepare the Internal Quality Assurance Manual (IQAS)
BOLOGNA DECLARATION
ALC-UE HE AREA
2015
Bridgin
g the g
ap
2010
[email protected]@aneca.es
Thank you