Gather evidence to demonstrate the impact of your research
-
Upload
heather-coates -
Category
Education
-
view
140 -
download
1
Transcript of Gather evidence to demonstrate the impact of your research
Gather evidence to demonstrate the impact of your researchMaximize Your Impact Workshop Series
Heather Coates, MLS, MSDigital Scholarship & Data Management LibrarianIUPUI University Library Center for Digital Scholarship
OverviewProductsLevels of Metrics/EvidenceTypes of Metrics/Evidence
Examples
Data Sources & Tools
Overview
IUPUI Value
s
Civic Engagement
Collaboration
Diversity, Equity,
Inclusion
Economic Development
(Indiana)
Interdisciplinary Work &
Publication
Open Access
Public Scholars/
Scholarship
R&CA in Urban Environment
RISE
Translational Research
https://academicaffairs.iupui.edu/PromotionTenure/IUPUI-Guidelines
Why do we need metrics?• P&T review committees can’t read everything• P&T review committee members are not experts in your
field• Models for producing scholarship differ by discipline and
research methods used• Some metrics are decent indicators of scholarly use
(e.g., citation)• Some metrics are decent indicators of public discussion
(e.g., Twitter, Facebook, news media attention)• Some metrics are decent indicators of reuse (e.g., data
citations)
Metrics are only one kind of evidence
How do we measure…• Relationships developed with practitioners and
patients• Affecting change in how stakeholders see an issue• The long-term benefits of community partnerships to
document and preserve local history• Increases in the civic literacy of adults across central
Indiana• Increased understanding of an issue by the state
legislature resulting from ongoing policy discussions
Consider
Leiden Manifesto for research metrics: http://www.leidenmanifesto.org/
San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA): http://www.ascb.org/dora/
“Do not use journal-based metrics, such as Journal Impact Factors (JIFs), as surrogate measures of the quality of individual research articles, to assess an individual scientist’s contributions, or in hiring, promotion, or funding decisions.”
Citation-based Metrics
Journal Level Metrics
Output/Article Level
Metrics
Author Level
Metrics
Citation Metrics: Levels of Evidence
• Article/Item-level: – citation counts, Field Weighted Citation Impact
(Scopus), Eigenfactor Article Influence Score, Relative Citation Ratio (NIH - https://icite.od.nih.gov/)
• Journal-level: – Journal Impact Factor, 5-year JIF, Eigenfactor
• Author-level: – h-index, i-10 index (Google Scholar)
Web Metrics
View Use
Social Media Metrics
Share
Recommend
Discuss
Altmetrics
Altmetrics• Supplement traditional metrics• Scope extends beyond the formal published
scholarly record (journals & books)• Timeframe: immediate to short-term impact• Sources: focus is online attention, interaction,
usage• DOES capture and link to qualitative data (ex: blog
snippets, tweet content)
Altmetrics Sources• Publishers
• Aggregation services– Impact Story:
http://impactstory.org/– Altmetric.com:
http://www.altmetric.com/– Plum Analytics:
https://plu.mx/g/samples
• Subject repositories– PubMedCentral (PMC)– arXiv– SSRN
• Institutional repositories– IUPUI ScholarWorks:
http://scholarworks.iupui.edu – IUPUI DataWorks:
http://dataworks.iupui.edu
Aggregator Sources• News media• Social media platforms• Blogs• Twitter• Reference managers (e.g., Mendeley)• other online conversations captured include
YouTube, Wikipedia, Reddit, F1000, Q&A, Policy Docs
https://www.altmetric.com/about-our-data/our-sources/
Using altmetrics to demonstrate impact
• Complementary/Supplemental– More immediate (before citations accrue)– Indications of impact outside your discipline and academia – Reflect engagement with and impact upon a broader audience,
beyond academia and community of practice
• Flavors of impact (Priem et al, 2012)– “popular hit” – highly tweeted and shared on non-academic social
media sites– “expert pick” – good F1000 ratings and subsequent citations, few
shares or social media mentions
https://becker.wustl.edu/impact-assessment
Impact IndicatorsResearch Output & Activities
Biological materials, collaborations, data, databases, repositories, techniques & procedures, grey literature, invention disclosures, mobile apps, patents, trainees, etc.
Advancement of Knowledge
Books/chapters (inclusion in bibliographies, library ownership, textbook use), change in understanding (paradigm shift, lead to new approach), citations (first & second generation citations, countries and institutions represented), conference themes, new centers/institutes
Clinical Implementation (or TRIP)
Biological materials, study cited in clinical decision aid, clinical/practice guidelines, diagnostic application, instruments, quality measure guidelines (gov’t or NPO), reporting requirements
Legislation & Policy
Committee participation, study cited in guidelines, study cited in policy, study cited in enactment of standards
Economic Benefit
Findings cited in reduced costs for delivery of healthcare services, findings result in enhancement of existing resources and expertise, license agreements for use of IP, spinoff or startup company
Community Benefit
Public awareness of risk factors, patient decision materials, cited in public/private insurance benefit plan
Examples
Citation Metrics Altmetrics
Product Title Journal/ SourceYear of Publication
JIF [Quartile Rank] Citations
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
Citation Benchmarking
Mendeley reads Twitter Blogs
Dietary inferences from dental occlusal microwear at mission San Luis de Apalachee
American Journal of Physical Anthropology 2005 2.1 [Q3] 22 1.51 55th percentile 47 0 0
A comparison of calcium to zoledronic acid for improvement of cortical bone in an animal model of CKD
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 2014 6.8 [Q1] 16 3.9 86th percentile 16 1 0
Reference-point indentation correlates with bone toughness assessed using whole-bone traditional mechanical testing Bone 2013 4.5 [Q1] 48 6.28 97th percentile 53 2 0
In vivo reference point indentation reveals positive effects of raloxifene on mechanical properties following 6 months of treatment in skeletally mature beagle dogs Bone 2013 4.5 [Q1] 27 3.47 94th percentile 19 0 1
Structure and function of platyrrhine caudal vertebrae Anatomical Record 2010 1.4 [Q3] 23 2.39 84th percentile 31 0 1
Functional correlates of fiber architecture of the lateral caudal musculature in prehensile and nonprehensile tails of the platyrrhini (primates) and procyonidae (carnivora) Anatomical Record 2009 1.5 [Q3] 23 2.04 80th percentile 103 0 1
Contours of the hominoid lateral tibial condyle with implications for Australopithecus
Journal of Human Evolution 2006 3.3 [Q2] 24 1.16 60th percentile 40 0 0
Product TitleItem
Views
Item Downloa
ds
Physician Workforce Collection 735 1363
Mental Health Workforce 819 1004
Nursing Workforce 662 1258
Oral Health 577 849
Primary Care Workforce 284 512
Pharmacy 447 432
Full Collection 3545 6019
How is this being disseminated to local and statewide communities of practice?
Qualitative feedback on these reports
Data literacy instructional materials (shared in 2014) Views
Downloads Favorites
Email Shares
Data Management Lab: Session 1 Slides 700 4 2 0Data Management Lab: Data management plan instructions 376 2 0 0Data Management Lab: Data mapping exercise instructions 807 4 0 0Data Management Lab: Data mapping exercise example 5407 5 0 1Data Management Lab: Session 2 slides 432 2 0 0Data Management Lab: Session 2 - Documentation Instructions 327 2 0 0Data Management Lab: Session 3 Slides 645 2 0 0Data Management Lab: Session 3 Data Review Checklist 402 3 0 0Data Management Lab: Session 3 Data Entry Best Practices 384 2 0 0Data Management Lab: Session 3 Data Coding Best Practices 270 2 0 0Data Management Lab: Session 4 Slides 590 6 0 0Data Management Lab: Session 4 Review Outline 538 3 0 0Data Topics Series: Ensuring data quality 550 11 0 1Data Topics Series: Preventing data loss 461 2 0 0Data Topics Series: Practical Data Management Plans 400 2 0 0
Chronicling Hoosier
https://katiemartinpapers.wordpress.com/2016/08/07/abstract-analysis-chronicling-hoosier/
Top 5 Non-Article OutputsTitle Impact EvidenceHuntington Study Group website Community
Receives more than 2,000 unique visitors per month.
HSG participant database Community4300 registered potential participants
Research sites Community 63 research sites in 11 countries
Physician's Guide to the Management of Huntington Disease
Clinical Implementation/TRIP Downloaded more than 2,400 times
UHDRSClinical Implementation/TRIP
Downloaded more than 13,000 times
Data Sources & Tools
Sources of Data• Web of Science• Journal Citation Reports (JCR)• Scopus• Google Scholar Citations• ImpactStory• Altmetric Bookmarklet• Publisher
Google Scholar
Gathering Data• Gather manually– Free– Time-consuming–Messy & redundant– Tailored to your
scholarship & argument– Include unusual or field-
specific sources • Use an aggregator
–Minimal cost (individual)– Less time-consuming– Generic, broad
presentation– Heavy emphasis on major
social media channels
https://impactstory.org/u/0000-0002-4356-3837
The problem is not a lack of data, but how to
evaluate, select, and make sense of it.
Using metrics responsibly• What is your case? Your story?–What statements do you need to support?
• Present the data in context
• Provide a range of evidence – metrics + qualitative evidence
Resources• Sarli, C. C., Dubinsky, E. K., & Holmes, K. L. (2010). Beyond citation analysis: a
model for assessment of research impact. Journal of the American Medical Library Association.
• Piwowar, H. & Priem, J. (2013). The power of altmetrics on a CV. Bulletin of the Association for Information Science & Technology. https://www.asis.org/Bulletin/Apr-13/AprMay13_Piwowar_Priem.html
• Roemer, R. C. & Borchardt, R. (2012). From bibliometrics to altmetrics: A changing scholarly landscape. College and Research Libraries News, 73(10), 596-600. http://crln.acrl.org/content/73/10/596.full
• Dinsmore, A., Allen, L., & Dolby, K. (2014). Alternative perspectives on impact: The potential of ALMs and altmetrics to inform funders about research impact. PLoS Biology, 12(11), e1002003. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002003
• Steven Roberts website & P&T dossier, both incorporating altmetrics: http://faculty.washington.edu/sr320/?p=2806
• Altmetric webinar: Applied Altmetrics: http://godigitalscience.com/view/mail?iID=Y9PXAVDJMH5JVAUPJU79
Images• Publish: https://thenounproject.com/search/?q=article&i=74762• Evaluate: https://thenounproject.com/search/?q=peer+review&i=210141 • Article: https://thenounproject.com/search/?q=article&i=74762 • Book: https://thenounproject.com/search/?q=book&i=547809• Binary code: https://thenounproject.com/search/?q=binary+code&i=177042 • Data stream: https://thenounproject.com/search/?q=data+stream&i=160443 • Q&A:
https://www.readytalk.com/blog/readytalk-admin/question-how-do-i-manage-the-qanda-portion-of-my-webinar
Heather CoatesDigital Scholarship & Data Management LibrarianUniversity Library Center for Digital Scholarship
[email protected] https://ulib.iupui.edu/digitalscholarship/impact