Gas Lift Optimization at BP-Indonesia Dual String Gas Lift Well With Injection Pressure Operated...

22
Gas Lift Optimization Gas Lift Optimization at BP-Indonesia at BP-Indonesia Dual String Gas Lift Well Dual String Gas Lift Well With Injection Pressure Operated Valve With Injection Pressure Operated Valve By: Gatut Widianoko Weatherford Artificial Lift Systems

Transcript of Gas Lift Optimization at BP-Indonesia Dual String Gas Lift Well With Injection Pressure Operated...

  • Slide 1
  • Gas Lift Optimization at BP-Indonesia Dual String Gas Lift Well With Injection Pressure Operated Valve By: Gatut Widianoko Weatherford Artificial Lift Systems By: Gatut Widianoko Weatherford Artificial Lift Systems
  • Slide 2
  • Abstract North West Java Oil (NWJO) field located offshore Indonesia is operated by BP. This mature oil field (discovered during 1970s) has approximately 950 wells, and ninety percent (90%) are produced with dual gas lift systems. In thirty (30) years of production, the reservoir pressure has decline to an average between 500 600 psig at the mid-perforation depth (ranging from 3000 - 4000 ft TVD). Discharge pressure of lift gas is 680 psig at compressor station(s). In June 2001, BP-Indonesia management made a decision to focus on optimizing their gas lift wells. After significant discussion, it was decided to take a non-conventional approach with respect to gas lifting dual wells by using Injection Pressure Operated valves (IPOs). Process Overview: create effective optimization organization design of dual gas lift utilizing IPO valves experiences and solutions for eliminating gas robbing.
  • Slide 3
  • Offshore Northwest Java Oil Field
  • Slide 4
  • Steps in Gas Lift Optimization BP Management - focus on gas lift optimization 90% of wells produced by dual gas lift Optimization Team selected Team reviews in-house (limited) gas lift expertise; decision made to contract gas lift services from Weatherford; GL engineer visits Jakarta office and NWJO field facilities Optimization Team reviews report; proposals submitted Weatherford; further discussions held regarding project Optimization Team contracts three (3) positions for implementation of NWJO project for 6 month period (including clause for additional 6 month extension) Objectives determined and proper means of tracking or trending established; workable reports Results of optimization reviewed weekly and monthly
  • Slide 5
  • Identify problem wells or common well problems Improving oil production rate Optimizing gas injection Reviewing well performance Maximize overall potential Stabilize oil production and gas injection Gas Lift Optimization Team Objectives
  • Slide 6
  • Contracted Job Titles OFFICE JOB Gas Lift Engineer Gathering reservoir & production data Reviewing gas lift performance & current GL design Generating recommendations WORKSHOP JOB GLV Technician Calibration and repair all gas lift equipment Manage gas lift equipment inventory & inventory reports FIELD JOB Gas Lift Specialist Installing, tuning & troubleshooting GL wells Training company field operators (personnel) Coordinate gas lift activities with field supervisor
  • Slide 7
  • Type of Recommendations
  • Slide 8
  • Number of Wells Reviewed Monthly
  • Slide 9
  • Oil Gain Contribution by Field Total oil gain = 3559 bopd
  • Slide 10
  • Well Case History Three-Pen Static Pressure Recorder Daily Production Record Flowing and Static Pressure Survey Flowing and Static Temperature Survey Echo Meter Survey Well File (Drilling, Well Schematic) Latest GLV Design Report Setting Pressure Report Wire Line Job Report Diagnostic Tools To optimize gas dual lift well, complete information is required:
  • Slide 11
  • Well Review by Team Old Oil Field with more than 30 years old High FGOR with 1000 : 1 or more Low PI with only about 1 3 blpd / psi Low Production with about 200 - 500 blpd Low Static Pressure with average ~ 600 psi Limited Casing Pressure with ~ 600 psi only Flowing Tubing Pressure is about 180 psi Shallow well - reservoir depth ~ 3000 ft TVD Limited data (SBHP and PI is normally unknown) Old wells - may have leaking valve or tubing Some gas lift valves installed 5-10 years ago
  • Slide 12
  • Dual Gas Lift Design Lessons Learned Enough Kick Off (KO) and Operating (OP) Pressure to reach deepest point of injection is required Differential pressure between KO and OP is ~10% of casing pressure, (or at least 50psi) to cover all unloading valves of both strings are closed when surface casing pressure is set at OP Use graphical method to select best point of injection of both strings and best draw down (200-300 psi) of both strings Calculate by computer setting pressure Ptro; select best port sizes and gas injection rate required All pressure settings (Ptro) of unloading valves for both strings must be selected according to surface closing pressure Surface closing pressure of both strings must be at least 20 psi above OP, and 10 psi less than KO Avoid gas robbing - depth point of injection of both strings must be close or equal; same thing in port size
  • Slide 13
  • UXA-4S/L Well Schematic REDESIGN WELL Since mandrels were installed in well, optimization on this will be done by redesign. Main job is how to determine best point of injection of both strings for optimum draw down and to avoiding robbing. To perform this job, gathering complete information of both strings is required. Since SBHP data is old enough, and to ensure static pressure therefore SBHP survey is required to be performed.
  • Slide 14
  • UXA 4S/L Data Data Description UXA 4S UXA 4L SBHP1200 psi*1200 psi PI (Predicted)2 3 W / C87 %85 % CHP650 psi FTP200 psi FGOR1300 : 11500 : 1 B t m Temp. 170 F178 F Surf. Temp 100 F C s g Size9 5/8 9 5/8 T b g Size2 7/8
  • Slide 15
  • Graphical Method 0 5001000 1500 2000 3000 4000 D E P T H Ft T V D PRESSURE (psi) FTPCHP 1200 p s i Casing Pressure UXA 4L Mid Perforation Tubing Pressure #1 #2 #3 #7 0.45 p s i / ft 0.1 p s I / ft FL FBHP
  • Slide 16
  • Existing Valve Installed SPM # U X A 4S U X A 4L 1Dummy 2G l v, 1/8, 615 #G l v, 1/8, 620 # 3G l v, 1/8, 600 #G l v, 3/16, 635 # 4G l v, 3/16, 615 #S/O, 3/16 5G l v, 3/16, 600 #Dummy 6G l v, 3/16, 590 #Dummy 7S/O, 3/16Dummy
  • Slide 17
  • Computer Program Results (UXA 4L) SPM # VALVEPORTPTROPCS 1GLV1/8595646 2GLV1/8300OPEN 3S/ONA 4D 5D 6D 7D NOTE: Third mandrel is designed with S/O, but existing #3 valve can not be pulled out, therefore #2 valve is opening and set with Ptro = 300 psi
  • Slide 18
  • Computer Program Results (UXA 4S) SPM # VALVEPORTPTROPCS 1GLV1/8595646 2GLV1/8590642 3S/O3/16NA 4D 5D 6D 7D
  • Slide 19
  • Gain Results After Gas Lift Redesign Gas lift valves were calibrated in workshop, then installed; unloading of tubing strings was done with at least 650 psi as KO. After well unloaded, then gas injection rate was adjusted to maintain surface casing pressure at 640 psi, or OP. Following chart summarizes results after gas lift optimization: UXA 4S BEFORE GL OPTIMIZATION ( March 1996 ) AFTER GL OPTIMIZATION ( March 2002 ) FLUID RATE413 BLPD1037 BLPD OIL RATE79 BOPD255 BOPD GAS IN864 MSCFD250 MSCFD GAS OUT2448 MSCFD550 MSCFD OPERATING PRESSURE: 640 psi
  • Slide 20
  • Gain Results After Gas Lift Redesign UXA 4L BEFORE GL OPTIMIZATION (March 1996 ) AFTER GL OPTIMIZATION (March 2002 ) (March 2002 ) FLUID RATE670 BLPD1751 BLPD OIL RATE97 BOPD122 BOPD GAS IN621 MSCFD120 MSCFD GAS OUT748 MSCFD186 MSCFD Well had been shut in since March 1996, and back on line March 2002 after gas lift redesign. OPERATING PRESSURE: 640 psi
  • Slide 21
  • UXA Platform Results After GL Optimization (March 2002)
  • Slide 22
  • Total Oil Gains After Well Work at BP-Indonesia NOTE: Gas lift is the biggest contributor (70%) of the well work jobs, which resulted in oil gain at NWJO; BP-Indonesia