Gaar India Bmr

8/13/2019 Gaar India Bmr

1/16

Allrightsreserved|Preliminar

y&

Tentative

DRAFT GAAR GUIDELINES (INDIA)

July 12, 2012

In association with


2/16


y&

Tentative

GAAR PROVISIONS


3/16

Allrightsreserved


y&

Tentative

GAAR A SNAPSHOT

| 3

Effective April 1, 2013 (ie for transactions pertaining to tax year 2013-14)

Doctrine of substance over form codified to deter tax avoidance

No carve out for genuine tax planning

Trigger for GAAR - main purpose or one of the main purpose is to obtain tax benefit

Authority of Advance Rulings (AAR) may be approached for determining applicability of

GAAROnus to prove that transaction meant to obtain a tax benefit on the Indian RevenueAuthorities (IRA)

GAAR panel to approve the application of GAAR

If GAAR invoked, Revenue empowered inter-alia to:

disregard or combine any step in the arrangement

look through the arrangement by disregarding the corporate structure

re-allocate income/ expense, re-characterize equity into debt or debt into equity

treat the place of residence of any party or situs of an asset or transaction other than place orlocation mentioned in the arrangement


4/16

Allrightsreserved


y&

Tentative

DRAFT GUIDELINES ON GAAR

| 4

Draft Guidelines issued by Chairman, Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) to giverecommendations and suggest safeguards for proper implementation of GAAR

The Draft Guidelines give a sneak preview into the mindset of the IRA

The legality of the Draft Guidelines can be questioned as they propose to overrule theprovisions of the domestic tax statute and the international tax treaties

Draft Guidelines contain explanation of GAAR provisions and illustrations for applicability of

GAAR


5/16

Allrightsreserved


y&

Tentative

| 5

Impact on Foreign Institutional Investors (FII)

Two options given under the proposed safe harbor :

FII to pay tax under the domestic tax law (ie not to avail treaty benefits) or

Avail tax treaty benefits but be open to application of GAAR; however GAAR not to applyto non-resident investors of the FII

Unilateral payment of tax not exactly a safe harbor!

Constitutionality of safe harbor requiring outright payment of tax in lieu of non- application ofGAAR could be questioned

No special treatment for FIIs

No clarity on level of substance required to be established by FIIs / PE Funds and if the levelwould be the same as in case of other holding/operating companies?

More clarity could be expected in the coming months

DRAFT GUIDELINES ON GAAR (CONT)


6/16

Allrightsreserved

Allrightsreserved|Preliminary&

Tentative

| 6

Impact on holding company structures / treaty shopping

Use of Mauritius / Singapore as intermediate jurisdictions for future investments?

Kind of substance to be established to defend the treaty benefits not clear:

Substance mentioned in the draft guidelines conclusive to get out of GAAR?

Substance mentioned in the draft guidelines BoD meetings in the country, carrying on

business with adequate manpower, own capital and infrastructure

Beneficial ownership test to be satisfied under GAAR in cases where the Mauritius /Singapore company is only a permitted transferee

Impact on business re-organisations

Merger of two companies with carry forward of loss not subject to GAAR if specific conditionsfor merger satisfied

Buy back of shares subject to taxation under GAAR - inconsistent with principles laid downunder the domestic tax law



7/16

Allrightsreserved


Tentative

| 7

Relevance of Circular 789 in the context of the draft guidelines

GAAR will override Circular 789 Mauritius investments subject to GAAR

Circular 789 (dated April 2000) issued by the CBDT states that the Mauritius tax treatybenefit shall be available if a valid Tax Residency Certificate (TRC) is provided

Therefore, existing and future US investments to be within the GAAR purview

Mauritius looking to negotiate grandfathering of the existing investments?



8/16

Allrightsreserved


Tentative

| 8

Onus to prove that a tax benefit was taken on the Revenue

Tax officer to state how / why the arrangement is captured within the GAAR purview

Reasoning given by the Revenue could be general (eg investing through Mauritius for treatybenefit, setting up an entity in India itself etc)

Unreasonable requests for information/documentation by the revenue anticipated

Draft format of the Reference Form prescribed the onus to prove on tax officer not wellread into the same

Practically difficult in arguing before the GAAR panel that the Revenue has not discharged theonus and has only made allegations without reasoning / evidence



9/16

Allrightsreserved


Tentative

KEY TAKEAWAYS

| 9

Negatives

No grandfathering for existing investments under GAAR

Assumedly low monetary threshold for non-application of GAAR

Reference procedure for application to the GAAR Panel reads as if the onus to prove still

on the taxpayer

Examples in the Draft Guidelines unclear

No granular substance requirements provided

Basic treaty benefits sought to be covered within the GAAR ambit

Illustrations are not sophisticated but amateurish

GAAR to override the international tax treaties (no unequivocal statement in respect of

bi-lateral tax treaties made by the Government)

Repatriation of profits by buy back of shares instead of distribution of dividend subject to

GAAR


10/16

Allrightsreserved


Tentative

KEY TAKEAWAYS

| 10

Positives

Reference to tax mitigation made for the first time to be kept outside the GAAR purview

Clarity on LoB clause in the Singapore tax treaty and the kind of expenses which will not be

considered in calculating the threshold limit (eg interest on loan from shareholder)

Declaration of dividend stated to be a business choice

GAAR held not to substitute SAARs

Similarly, in the absence of anti-deferral provisions (ie CFC provisions), GAAR not to be

applied

Choice of raising equity vs debt, again stated as a business choice

In the absence of thin capitalization rules, GAAR cannot be invoked (however, Transfer

Pricing shall apply on interest payments to related parties)

Merger of loss making entity into profit making entity outside GAAR owing to existence of

SAARs in the statute


11/16

Allrightsreserved


Tentative

CONCLUSION

| 11

Sale of shares of Mauritius / Singapore company taxable as indirect transfer under thedomestic tax law expectation of a clarificatory circular on the same

Documentation for each step in a transaction / structure stating the intent of the parties to beclearly captured

Need for supplement documentation with expert reports, legal opinions etc

Need to bring out substance as much as possible to mitigate the GAAR exposure

Preparedness for GAAR to begin now


12/16

Allrightsreserved


Tentative

GAAR THE BMR APPROACH

| 12

BMR THOUGHT LEADERSHIP

Please refer the following links for BMR papers on GAAR

GAAR impact on cross-border structuring

SAAR to GAAR Impact on domestic structures and transactions

Business Standard: A reform approach to the policy debate

Business World: A Strong Case for GAAR

Financial Express: Draft GAAR guidelines step in right direction?

In case of any query, please write to us at [email protected]


13/16

Allrightsreserved


Tentative

Mukesh Butani

| 13

Mukesh is Chairman, an Of counsel to the firm and Managing Partner of BMR Legal. With a specialisationin international tax and transfer pricing, he has over 25 years experience in advising Fortune 500multinationals and Indian business houses on a wide range of matters relating to cross-border taxstructuring, tax controversy and tax policy.

A former national tax Director and international tax Partner at two Big Four firms, Mukesh currently servesas a member of the board of Taxand, the worlds largest independent tax organisation, and as ViceChairman of the International Chamber of Commerce Commission on Taxation. He was recently inductedas member of the Advisory Group on International Tax and Transfer Pricing constituted by the IndianMinistry of Finance. He is also a member of the OECD Business Restructuring Advisory Group.

Mukesh is an acclaimed expert on international tax and transfer pricing and has a number of authorships tohis credit including works published by LexisNexis Butterworths and most recently, a treatise on DisputeResolution for the Cambridge University Press. His other authorships include the Wolters Kluwer CCHonline guide to Transfer Pricing in Asia and titles on Business Restructurings and Customs Valuation, co-authored for the International Bureau of Fiscal Documentation (IBFD). Mukesh participated in the Kelkartask force tax reforms and was a member of the Indian Governments committee on e-commerce taxation.He is presently representing ICC in the Standing Committee on withholding tax.

Mukesh has consistently featured among the leading international tax and transfer pricing advisors inindependent surveys, most notably the International Tax Review, Legal Media expert guide,Asia Law

Leading Lawyers, Chambers & Partners and Legal Whos Who of Corporate Tax Lawyers.


14/16

Allrightsreserved

Allrightsreserved|Prelimina

ry&

Tentative

Gokul Chaudhri

| 14IFA Conference - Recent case laws

Gokul is a tax Partner with BMR Advisors, leading the direct tax practice of the firm. He has over 20years experience in tax matters with a focus on the energy sector.

Prior to joining BMR Advisors at its founding in November 04, Gokul was the leader of the Energy,Chemicals and Mining industry and member of the Oil & Gas industry team at a Big 4 f irm.

His professional service experience includes significant engagements for domestic and internationalclients, including multi-billion dollar cross border transactions, privatization initiatives and projectadvisory for large infrastructure assets. In addition, he has extensive experience in structuring andpresenting (possibly over 400 in number) in-bound foreign investment proposals to the Governmentof India. In the early years of the liberalization in India, he was the joint leader for the engagement

commissioned by the Ministry of Industry and Commerce for benchmarking concerns and challengesfaced by foreign investors in India.

Over the past decade, Gokul has been an active speaker at domestic and international seminars.He is a member of the Institute of Petroleum (now The Energy Institute, London) and Federation ofIndian Mineral Industries. He is the Chairman of the Energy committee of PHD Chambers ofCommerce and Industry . He has been a participant and speaker at the investment road shows heldin Europe by the Government of India and was also invited in 2006 by the business forum of theEuropean Commission to speak at Brussels on the reform process in India.

Gokul has been involved in fiscal reform initiatives by the Government of India, and was a memberof the task force on tax reforms for the mining industry. He is currently a member of the executivecouncil of International Fiscal Association North India. He also served as a member of the financesub group for road map for Clean Development Mechanism under the National Action Plan forClimate Change, and technical group for guidance on accounting of carbon credits constituted by theInstitute of Chartered Accountants of India.

Gokul is a graduate in Commerce from the University of Mumbai and qualified as a CharteredAccountant in 1994.


15/16

Allrightsreserved

Allrightsreserved|Prelimina

ry&

Tentative

Shefali Goradia

| 15IFA Conference - Recent case laws

Shefali is a Partner with the firms corporate tax practice in Mumbai. With a specialisation in crossborder taxation, she has over 20 years of experience in international tax.

Shefali is extensively involved in advising multinational corporations on a range of issues indesigning global holding and operating structures, structuring inbound and outbound investments,cross border mergers, acquisitions and other corporate reorganizations. She is also involved indeveloping and implementing domestic and international fund structures for leading investment andprivate equity fund houses. In addition, her work covers advice to several pharmaceuticalcompanies, and software and e-commerce companies in the IT industry. Within the financialservices industry, she advises banks in designing structured finance products and works with

several fund houses and asset management companies.

Shefali has most recently been conferred as one of Asias pre-eminent lawyers for taxation in theAsia Law Leading Lawyers Survey 2011 and has featured in the Legal Whos Who of Corporate TaxLawyers and The Private Funds Lawyers for the third consecutive year in 2011. She is a regularwriter and lecturer on international tax topics and has contributed to the India chapter on Is there aPermanent Establishment? for the 63rd IFA Congress in Vancouver, 2009. She is also a member ofthe core group on International Tax of the Bombay Chartered Accountants Society.

Shefali is a graduate in Commerce from the University of Mumbai and qualified as a CharteredAccountant in 1991.


16/16

C h a l l e n g e U s

Disclaimer:

This presentation has been prepared for clients and Firm personnel only. It provides general information and guidance as ondate of preparation and does not express views or expert opinions of BMR Advisors. The presentation is meant for generalguidance and no responsibility for loss arising to any person acting or refraining from acting as a result of any materialcontained in this presentation will be accepted by BMR Advisors. It is recommended that professional advice be sought basedon the specific facts and circumstances. This presentation does not substitute the need to refer to the original pronouncements

Gaar India Bmr

Documents

Transcript of Gaar India Bmr