G. Lagerloef and D. Carey, ESR - University of Maine · • 2x3 subplot overlay dTf results for...

11
Aquarius Cal/Val Workshop 10-12 January 2017 Santa Rosa Assessing seasonal to interannual calibration drifts with Level-2 co-located surface observations G. Lagerloef and D. Carey, ESR

Transcript of G. Lagerloef and D. Carey, ESR - University of Maine · • 2x3 subplot overlay dTf results for...

Page 1: G. Lagerloef and D. Carey, ESR - University of Maine · • 2x3 subplot overlay dTf results for both data sets. • Describe differences: HyCom vs no HyCom with NSAD zones ... –

Aquarius Cal/Val Workshop 10-12 January 2017 Santa Rosa

Assessing seasonal to interannual calibration drifts with Level-2 co-located surface observations G. Lagerloef and D. Carey, ESR

Page 2: G. Lagerloef and D. Carey, ESR - University of Maine · • 2x3 subplot overlay dTf results for both data sets. • Describe differences: HyCom vs no HyCom with NSAD zones ... –

2 of 12 January 2017

Outline

•  Statement of the problem

–  Determine radiometer calibration drifts without reference to HyCom

•  V4.2.0 & V4.2.1 Data sets used here

–  Describe attributes (HyCom vs instrument-only wiggle)

•  Analysis approach: NSAD decomposition

•  Example 1V; Analysis stages, and plot 1V dTf for both data sets on single panel

•  2x3 subplot overlay dTf results for both data sets.

•  Describe differences: HyCom vs no HyCom with NSAD zones

•  Propose different zonation: subtropical gyres, tropical basins, sub-polar zones (separate southern ocean by basin).

Page 3: G. Lagerloef and D. Carey, ESR - University of Maine · • 2x3 subplot overlay dTf results for both data sets. • Describe differences: HyCom vs no HyCom with NSAD zones ... –

3 of 12 January 2017

Input Data Processing

•  Aquarius Level 2 – AVDS colocation (matchup) processing

•  Daily accumulation files, including only data that meets Aquarius L2 calibration flag criteria.

•  AVDS SSS and ancSST converted to TH & TV (M&W model)

•  Difference these from Aquarius L2 (rad_TbX_rc (where X = {V, H} polarizations))

–  Compute dTb = Aq_Tb – AVDS_Tb

–  Compile daily mean (dTb) within each zone and beam number.

•  7-day median filter

Page 4: G. Lagerloef and D. Carey, ESR - University of Maine · • 2x3 subplot overlay dTf results for both data sets. • Describe differences: HyCom vs no HyCom with NSAD zones ... –

4 of 12 January 2017

Theory

Time

dTb N S A D

X 1  0 0 -1 1 0 0 -1 1 0 0 -1

T Transform

=

Double Difference DD

N-S S-A A-D

1.  Transform: DD = dTb x T 2.  Regression: R = DD\dTb 3.  Inverse: dTb_r = DD*R Expected to contain geophysical

model error (dTe) but not instrument error (dTf) 4.  dTb – dTb_r = dTf 5.  dTe = -dTb_r

Matrix manipulation

Time

4

Page 5: G. Lagerloef and D. Carey, ESR - University of Maine · • 2x3 subplot overlay dTf results for both data sets. • Describe differences: HyCom vs no HyCom with NSAD zones ... –

5 of 12 January 2017

Page 6: G. Lagerloef and D. Carey, ESR - University of Maine · • 2x3 subplot overlay dTf results for both data sets. • Describe differences: HyCom vs no HyCom with NSAD zones ... –

6 of 12 January 2017

Sensor Drift 4.2.0

Page 7: G. Lagerloef and D. Carey, ESR - University of Maine · • 2x3 subplot overlay dTf results for both data sets. • Describe differences: HyCom vs no HyCom with NSAD zones ... –

7 of 12 January 2017

Sensor Drift 4.2.1

Page 8: G. Lagerloef and D. Carey, ESR - University of Maine · • 2x3 subplot overlay dTf results for both data sets. • Describe differences: HyCom vs no HyCom with NSAD zones ... –

8 of 12 January 2017

4.2.0 and 4.2.1 Overlay

Page 9: G. Lagerloef and D. Carey, ESR - University of Maine · • 2x3 subplot overlay dTf results for both data sets. • Describe differences: HyCom vs no HyCom with NSAD zones ... –

9 of 12 January 2017

4.2.0 and 4.2.1 Overlay

Page 10: G. Lagerloef and D. Carey, ESR - University of Maine · • 2x3 subplot overlay dTf results for both data sets. • Describe differences: HyCom vs no HyCom with NSAD zones ... –

10 of 12 January 2017

Ocean Provinces

NPAC NPAC

SPAC SATL SIND SPAC

NATL

MLPAC MLATL MLIND

Page 11: G. Lagerloef and D. Carey, ESR - University of Maine · • 2x3 subplot overlay dTf results for both data sets. • Describe differences: HyCom vs no HyCom with NSAD zones ... –

11 of 12 January 2017

Outline (2)

•  Where to go from here:

–  Re-analyze with zones by ocean provinces

–  How to manage the residual regional geophysical/environmental errors? •  Try EOF of dTe in all 6 channels: hypothesis that they be strongly

correlated.

–  Examine RIM effects

•  Generate a “fixed” AVDS colocation data base

–  Merge with L2 file structure

–  Include with calibration processing (i.e. primary or secondary cal-loop)

•  Can we use similar tools to empirically adjust Asc-Dsc RFI biases, and other Asc-Dsc differences?

•  My personal research agenda for next few months…

•  Questions & discussion