FY07 Restriction Petition Survey and Restriction Training Update
-
Upload
deborah-baldwin -
Category
Documents
-
view
26 -
download
0
description
Transcript of FY07 Restriction Petition Survey and Restriction Training Update
1
FY07 Restriction Petition Surveyand
Restriction Training Update
Julie Burke
TC1600 Quality Assurance Specialist
571-272-0512
2
TC 1600 Filings and Restrictions
TC1600 mails out about 28,000 first actions on the merits each year and about 12,000 restriction requirements
Of about 12,000 restriction requirements mailed per year, only about 75 are petitioned
21% of TC1600 cases are filed under 35 U. S. C. 371 (i.e., the national stage of a PCT application), yet 371 applications account for about 30% of the petitions
on average, a 91 day turnaround time to mail decision for a restriction petition
3
Restriction and Lack Of Unity Petitions Filed in FY04, 05, 06, 07
7570
49
83
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
2004 2005 2006 (1st plus 2ndQtr.)
2007
Fiscal Year
Nu
mb
er O
f P
etit
ion
s F
iled
PetitionsFiled
4
Petitions For Restriction Requirement In 111(a) Application Versus Lack of Unity Determinations In 371 Application In FY04, 05, 06, 07
74
58
7178
26
42
2922
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07
Fiscal Year
Per
cen
tag
e
111(a) in percent
371 in Percent
5
Petitons Outcome By Fiscal Year
44
38
31
37
12
2629 29
38
32
39
24
64
2
10
-
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07
Fiscal Year
Pe
rce
na
tge
Of
Pe
titi
on
s F
iled
Grant
Grant In Part
Deny
Dismissed
6
Restriction Petitions By Work Group Filed in FY04, 05, 06 and 07
10
16
20
18
8
5
26
14 14
10
2
20
14
10
3
10
28
1615
14
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1610 1620 1630 1640 1650
Work group
Nu
mb
er o
f p
etit
on
s fi
led FY04
FY05
FY06
FY07
7
Petition Outcome By Work Group For FY05
5
17
2 2
00
2
5 56
0
76
7
4
0
23
2 2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
1610 1620 1630 1640 1650
Work group
Num
ber o
f pet
ition
s fil
ed Grant
Grant In Part
Deny
Dismissed
8
Petition Outcome By Work Group For FY06
2
11
1 1 1
0
3
6
4
00
6 6
5
2
0 0
1
0 00
2
4
6
8
10
12
1610 1620 1630 1640 1650
Work Group
Nu
mb
er
of
pe
titi
on
s f
iled
Grant
Grant In Part
Deny
Dismissed
9
Petition Outcome By Work Group FY07
4
10
6 6
5
0
11
5
6
3
4 4 4
2
5
2
3
1 1 1
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1610 1620 1630 1640 1650
Work Group
To
tal
Grant
Grant In Part
Deny
Dismissed
10
Types Of Concerns FY04
16
12
17
4
0
4
17
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Markush 10Seq/case
Burden LinkingClaim
Rejoinder Distinction GroupingWrong
Tota
l
11
Types Of Concerns FY05
27
2
10
64
7 7
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Markush 10Seq/case
Burden LinkingClaim
Rejoinder Distinction GroupingWrong
To
tal
12
Types Of Concerns FY06
14
87 7
23
4
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Markush 10Seq/case
Burden LinkingClaim
Rejoinder Distinction GroupingWrong
To
tal
13
Types Of Concerns FY07
21
3
31
9
5
32
8
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Markush 10 Seq/case Burden Linking Claim Rejoinder Distinction GroupingWrong
Tota
l
Number OfConcerns
14
TC1600 Restriction TalksOverview of Revised Chapter 800, Part 1 and Part 2
– BCP Talk 9/06– Presented to all new examiners in Training Academy, FY07
Products and Processes– BCP Talk 6/07 – Presented to new TC1600 examiners in Training Academy, FY07
Nucleic Acid Sequences– BCP Talk 9/07– Biotech examiner training planned for 4/08
15
TC1600 Restriction TrainingGenus, Species, Markush and Linking Claims
– BCP Talk 3/07– TC1600 Training completed 7/07
Combination/Subcombination Practice – BCP Talk 12/07– TC1600 Training completed 2/08
Rejoinder Practice – BCP Talk 3/08– TC1600 Training planned for 6/08