FY 2017-2018 Annual Report · FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.2 – Municipal Operations Permittee...

FY 2017-2018 Annual Report Permittee Name: City of Hercules

FY 17-18 AR Form i-1 9/30/18

Table of Contents

Section Page

Section 1 – Permittee Information ..................................................................................................................... 1-1

Section 2 – Provision C.2 Municipal Operations ............................................................................................... 2-1

Section 3 – Provision C.3 New Development and Redevelopment ................................................................ 3-1

Section 4 – Provision C.4 Industrial and Commercial Site Controls .................................................................. 4-1

Section 5 – Provision C.5 Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination ............................................................... 5-1

Section 6 – Provision C.6 Construction Site Controls ......................................................................................... 6-1

Section 7 – Provision C.7 Public Information and Outreach ............................................................................ 7-1

Section 9 – Provision C.9 Pesticides Toxicity Controls........................................................................................ 9-1

Section 10 – Provision C.10 Trash Load Reduction.......................................................................................... 10-1

Section 11 – Provision C.11 Mercury Controls ................................................................................................. 11-1

Section 12 – Provision C.12 PCBs Controls ....................................................................................................... 12-1

Section 13 – Provision C.13 Copper Controls .................................................................................................. 13-1

Section 15 – Provision C.15 Exempted and Conditionally Exempted Discharges ......................................... 15-1

FY 2017 - 2018 Annual Report Permittee Information

Permittee Name: City of Hercules

FY 17-18 AR Form 1-1 9/30/18

Section 1 – Permittee Information

SECTION I. BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Background Information


Population: 24,848

NPDES Permit No.: CAS612008 (San Francisco Bay RWQCB Permit)

Order Number: R2-2015-0049 (San Francisco Bay RWQCB Permit)

Reporting Time Period (month/year): July 2017 through June 2018

Name of the Responsible Authority: David Biggs Title: City Manager

Mailing Address: 111 Civic Drive

City: Hercules Zip Code: 94547 Hercules Zip Code:

Telephone Number: 510.799.8200 Fax Number: 510.245.2521

E-mail Address: [email protected]

Name of the Designated Stormwater

Management Program Contact (if

different from above):

Mike Roberts Title: Public Works Director/City Engineer

Department: Public Works Department

Mailing Address: 111 Civic Drive

City: Hercules Zip Code: 94547 Hercules Zip Code:

Telephone Number: 510.799.8241 Fax Number: 510.799.8249

E-mail Address: [email protected]

FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.2 – Municipal Operations


FY 17-18 AR Form 2-1 9/30/18

Section 2 - Provision C.2 Reporting Municipal Operations

Program Highlights and Evaluation Highlight/summarize activities for reporting year:

Summary:

Refer to the C.2 Municipal Operations section of the CCCWP’s FY 16-17 Annual Report for a description of activities implemented at the

countywide and/or regional level.

C.2.a. ►Street and Road Repair and Maintenance

Place a Y in the boxes next to activities where applicable BMPs were implemented. If not applicable, type NA in the box and provide an

explanation in the comments section below. Place an N in the boxes next to activities where applicable BMPs were not implemented for one or

more of these activities during the reporting fiscal year, then in the comments section below provide an explanation of when BMPs were not

implemented and the corrective actions taken.

Y Control of debris and waste materials during road and parking lot installation, repaving or repair maintenance activities from polluting

stormwater

Y Control of concrete slurry and wastewater, asphalt, pavement cutting, and other street and road maintenance materials and wastewater

from discharging to storm drains from work sites.

Y Sweeping and/or vacuuming and other dry methods to remove debris, concrete, or sediment residues from work sites upon completion of

work.

Comments:



FY 17-18 AR Form 2-2 9/30/18

C.2.b. ►Sidewalk/Plaza Maintenance and Pavement Washing





Y Control of wash water from pavement washing, mobile cleaning, pressure wash operations at parking lots, garages, trash areas, gas station

fueling areas, and sidewalk and plaza cleaning activities from polluting stormwater

Y Implementation of the BASMAA Mobile Surface Cleaner Program BMPs

Comments:

C.2.c. ►Bridge and Structure Maintenance and Graffiti Removal





Y Control of discharges from bridge and structural maintenance activities directly over water or into storm drains

Y Control of discharges from graffiti removal activities

Y Proper disposal for wastes generated from bridge and structure maintenance and graffiti removal activities

Y Implementation of the BASMAA Mobile Surface Cleaner Program BMPs for graffiti removal

Y Employee training on proper capture and disposal methods for wastes generated from bridge and structural maintenance and graffiti

removal activities.

Y Contract specifications requiring proper capture and disposal methods for wastes generated from bridge and structural maintenance and

graffiti removal activities.

Comments:

City staff removes all graffiti and no contractors are engaged for this work. Graffiti is rare within our City, but staff is trained in proper methods of

removal, capture and disposal of waste generated from this activity.



FY 17-18 AR Form 2-3 9/30/18

C.2.e. ►Rural Public Works Construction and Maintenance

Does your municipality own/maintain rural1 roads: Yes X No

If your answer is No then skip to C.2.f.





Control of road-related erosion and sediment transport from road design, construction, maintenance, and repairs in rural areas

Identification and prioritization of rural road maintenance based on soil erosion potential, slope steepness, and stream habitat resources

No impact to creek functions including migratory fish passage during construction of roads and culverts

Inspection of rural roads for structural integrity and prevention of impact on water quality

Maintenance of rural roads adjacent to streams and riparian habitat to reduce erosion, replace damaging shotgun culverts and excessive

erosion

Re-grading of unpaved rural roads to slope outward where consistent with road engineering safety standards, and installation of water bars

as appropriate

Inclusion of measures to reduce erosion, provide fish passage, and maintain natural stream geomorphology when replacing culverts or

design of new culverts or bridge crossings

Comments including listing increased maintenance in priority areas:

1Rural means any watershed or portion thereof that is developed with large lot home-sites, such as one acre or larger, or with primarily agricultural, grazing or open space uses.



FY 17-18 AR Form 2-4 9/30/18

C.2.f. ►Corporation Yard BMP Implementation

Place an X in the boxes below that apply to your corporations yard(s):

We do not have a corporation yard

Our corporation yard is a filed NOI facility and regulated by the California State Industrial Stormwater NPDES General Permit

X We have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for the Corporation Yard(s)

Place an X in the boxes below next to implemented SWPPP BMPs to indicate that these BMPs were implemented in applicable instances. If not

applicable, type NA in the box. If one or more of the BMPs were not adequately implemented during the reporting fiscal year then indicate so

and explain in the comments section below:

Control of pollutant discharges to storm drains such as wash waters from cleaning vehicles and equipment

X Routine inspection prior to the rainy seasons of corporation yard(s) to ensure non-stormwater discharges have not entered the storm drain

system

Containment of all vehicle and equipment wash areas through plumbing to sanitary or another collection method

X Use of dry cleanup methods when cleaning debris and spills from corporation yard(s) or collection of all wash water and disposing of wash

water to sanitary or other location where it does not impact surface or groundwater when wet cleanup methods are used

X Cover and/or berm outdoor storage areas containing waste pollutants

Comments:

The City of Hercules corporation year is more a storage yard than a corporation yard. No vehicles or parts washing on-site. A SWPPP has been

filed and BMP’s are continually maintained as required.

If you have a corporation yard(s) that is not an NOI facility, complete the following table for inspection results for your corporation yard(s) or

attach a summary including the following information:

Corporation Yard Name

Corp Yard Activities w/ site-

specific SWPPP BMPs

Inspection

Date2 Inspection Findings/Results

Date and Description of

Follow-up and/or

Corrective Actions

City of Hercules

Corporation Yard

1. Site Drainage – all

flows go to Bio-

retention area.

2. Materials Storage –

All hazardous

10/18/2017 All BMPs in place were found to be

functional and in good working order. The

Bio-retention area is functioning as

designed and no maintenance was

needed this past year. The secondary

No follow up actions

required.

2 Minimum inspection frequency is once a year during September.



FY 17-18 AR Form 2-5 9/30/18

materials are stored

in an area with

secondary

containment. The

only materials stored

onsite are from

Illegal Dumping P/U.

3. All Sanitary Sewer

flows go to onsite

storage tank and are

removed via pump

service.

containment area is operational although

not being used much as there were no

illegal dumping issues to report on.The

above ground Sanitary Sewer Tank is

functioning and no maintenance was

needed this reporting year.

FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.3 – New Development and Redevelopment


FY 17-18 AR Form 3-1 9/30/18

Section 3 - Provision C.3 Reporting New Development and Redevelopment

C.3.b.iv.(2) ►Regulated Projects Reporting

Fill in attached table C.3.b.iv.(2) or attach your own table including the same information. No projects to report

C.3.e.iv. ►Alternative or In-Lieu Compliance with Provision C.3.c.

Is your agency choosing to require 100% LID treatment onsite for all Regulated Projects and not allow alternative

compliance under Provision C.3.e.?

Yes X

No

Comments (optional):

C.3.e.v ► Special Projects Reporting

1. In FY 2017-18, has your agency received, but not yet granted final discretionary approval of, a development

permit application for a project that has been identified as a potential Special Project based on criteria listed in

MRP Provision C.3.e.ii(2) for any of the three categories of Special Projects (Categories A, B or C)?

Yes

X

No

2. In FY 2017-18, has your agency granted final discretionary approval to a Special Project? If yes, include the

project in both the C.3.b.iv.(2) Table, and the C.3.e.v. Table.

Yes X

No

If you answered “Yes” to either question,

1) Complete Table C.3.e.v.

2) Attach narrative discussion of 100% LID Feasibility or Infeasibility for each project.



FY 17-18 AR Form 3-2 9/30/18

C.3.h.v.(2) ► Reporting Newly Installed Stormwater Treatment

Systems and HM Controls (Optional)

On an annual basis, before the wet season, provide a list of newly installed (installed within the reporting year) stormwater treatment systems and

HM controls to the local mosquito and vector control agency and the Water Board. The list shall include the facility locations and a description of

the stormwater treatment measures and HM controls installed.

See attached Table C.3.h.v.(2) for list of newly installed Stormwater Treatment Systems/HM Controls.

C.3.h.v.(3)(a) –(c) and (f) ► Installed Stormwater Treatment

Systems Operation and Maintenance Verification Inspection

Program Reporting

Site Inspections Data Number/Percentage

Total number of Regulated Projects (including offsite projects, and Regional Projects) in your agency’s database

or tabular format at the end of the previous fiscal year (FY16-17) 11

Total number of Regulated Projects (including offsite projects, and Regional Projects) in your agency’s database

or tabular format at the end of the reporting period (FY 17-18) 11

Total number of Regulated Projects (including offsite projects, and Regional Projects) for which O&M verification

inspections were conducted during the reporting period (FY 17-18)

10

Percentage of the total number of Regulated Projects (including offsite projects, and Regional Projects) inspected

during the reporting period (FY 17-18) 90%3

3 Based on the number of Regulated Projects in the database or tabular format at the end of the previous fiscal year (FY 15-16), per MRP Provision

C.3.h.ii.(6)(b).



FY 17-18 AR Form 3-3 9/30/18

C.3.h.v.(3)(d)-(e) ► Installed Stormwater Treatment Systems

Operation and Maintenance Verification Inspection Program

Reporting

Provide a discussion of the inspection findings for the year and any common problems encountered with various types of treatment systems

and/or HM controls. This discussion should include a general comparison to the inspection findings from the previous year.

Summary:

Water Board staff in their April 11, 2011 annual report review letter indicated that a self-inspection by owners/operators of treatment and HM

controls is not acceptable as a municipal O&M verification inspection. Inspections must be conducted by Permittee staff and/or contractor

under direction of the permittee. However, for vault-based treatment systems, Permittees may accept 3rd party inspection reports in-lieu of

conducting Permittee O&M inspections only if the 3rd party inspections are conducted at least annually.

Provide a discussion of the effectiveness of the O&M Program and any proposed changes to improve the O&M Program (e.g., changes in

prioritization plan or frequency of O&M inspections, other changes to improve effectiveness program).

Summary:

City staff continues to clean and inspect the device at the BART parking lot on a weekly basis. Organic material is collected and the site are

maintained by a contract landscaper every 6 months. The device continues to operate effectively and there have been no extraordinary

maintenance issues.

The hydrodynamic separators are maintained annually by a contract services. Reports are submitted to The City and no anomalies were

indicated.

C.3.h.v.(4)► Enforcement Response Plan

Does your agency have an Enforcement Response Plan for all O&M inspections of stormwater treatment

measures? X

Yes

No

If No, explain:



FY 17-18 AR Form 3-4 9/30/18

C.3.i. ►Required Site Design Measures for Small Projects and

Detached Single Family Home Projects

On an annual basis, discuss the implementation of the requirements of Provision C.3.i, including ordinance revisions, permit conditions,

development of standard specifications and/or guidance materials, and staff training.

Summary:

The Contra Costa Clean Water Program adopted a December 1, 2012 addendum to the Stormwater C.3 Guidebook, 6th Edition. The

addendum, “Preparing a Stormwater Control Plan for a Small Land Development Project,” includes step-by-step instructions, a project data

form, and standard specifications for runoff reduction measures. The City of Hercule’s stormwater ordinance requires that applications for

development approvals for projects subject to the permit’s new development requirements include a Stormwater Control Plan meeting the

criteria in the most recent version of the Stormwater C.3 Guidebook.

C.3.j.i.(5)(d) ► Green Infrastructure Outreach

On an annual basis, provide a summary of your agency’s outreach and education efforts pertaining to Green Infrastructure planning and

implementation.

Summary:

City staff made a presentation to the City Council during this fiscal year providing information on upcoming requirements. A power point was

presented with information aimed at educating the Council on upcoming requirements. In addition to the presentation, Council was provided with

a staff report outlining Permit timelines in an effort to help give Council an idea of what requirements are coming and what those requirements will

require at the City level.

Please refer to the Countywide Program’s FY 17-18 Annual Report for a summary of outreach efforts implemented at the Countywide level.

C.3.j.ii.(2) ► Early Implementation of Green Infrastructure

Projects

On an annual basis, submit a list of green infrastructure projects, public and private, that are already planned for implementation during the

permit term and infrastructure projects planned for implementation during the permit term that have potential for green infrastructure measures.

Include the following information:

A summary of planning or implementation status for each public and private green infrastructure project that is not also a Regulated

Project as defined in Provision C.3.b.ii. (see C.3.j.ii.(2) Table B - Planned Green Infrastructure Projects).

A summary of how each public infrastructure project with green infrastructure potential will include green infrastructure measures to the

maximum extent practicable during the permit term. For any public infrastructure project where implementation of green infrastructure

measures is not practicable, submit a brief description of the project and the reasons green infrastructure measures were impracticable

to implement (see C.3.j.ii.(2) Table A - Public Projects Reviewed for Green Infrastructure).

Background Information:



FY 17-18 AR Form 3-5 9/30/18

Describe how this provision is being implemented by your agency, including the process used by your agency to identify projects with potential

for green infrastructure, if applicable.

Refer to BASMAA guidance on identifying and reviewing potential green infrastructure projects

Summary of Planning or Implementation Status of Identified Projects:

See attached Tables C.3.j.ii.(2)-A and C.3.j.ii.(2)-B for the required information, and any additional notes provided here (optional).

C.3.j.iii.(2) ► Participate in Processes to Promote Green

Infrastructure

On an annual basis, report on the goals and outcomes during the reporting year of work undertaken to participate in processes to promote green

infrastructure.

Please refer to Countywide Program’s FY 17-18 Annual Report for a summary of efforts conducted to help regional, State, and federal agencies

plan, design and fund incorporation of green infrastructure measures into local infrastructure projects, including transportation projects.

C.3.j.iv.(2) ► Tracking and Reporting Progress

On an annual basis, report progress on development and implementation of methods to track and report implementation of green infrastructure

measures and provide reasonable assurance that wasteload allocations for TMDLs are being met.

Please refer to the Countywide Program’s FY 17-18 Annual Report for a summary of methods being developed to track and report implementation

of green infrastructure measures.



FY 17-18 AR Form 3-6 9/30/18

C.3.b.iv.(2) ►Regulated Projects Reporting Table (part 1) – Projects

Approved During the Fiscal Year Reporting Period

Project Name

Project No.

Project Location4, Street

Address Name of Developer

Project

Phase

No.5

Project Type &

Description6 Project Watershed7

Total

Site

Area

(Acres)

Total

Area of

Land

Disturbed

(Acres)

Total New

Impervious

Surface

Area (ft2)8

Total

Replaced

Impervious

Surface Area

(ft2)9

Total Pre-

Project

Impervious

Surface

Area10(ft2)

Total Post-

Project

Impervious

Surface

Area11(ft2)

Private Projects

NA

Public Projects

NA

Comments:

4Include cross streets 5If a project is being constructed in phases, indicate the phase number and use a separate row entry for each phase. If not, enter “NA”. 6Project Type is the type of development (i.e., new and/or redevelopment). Example descriptions of development are: 5-story office building, residential with 160 single-family homes with five 4-story buildings to contain 200 condominiums, 100 unit 2-story

shopping mall, mixed use retail and residential development (apartments), industrial warehouse. 7State the watershed(s) in which the Regulated Project is located. Downstream watershed(s) may be included, but this is optional.8All impervious surfaces added to any area of the site that was previously existing pervious surface. 9All impervious surfaces added to any area of the site that was previously existing impervious surface. 10For redevelopment projects, state the pre-project impervious surface area. 11For redevelopment projects, state the post-project impervious surface area.



FY 17-18 AR Form 3-7 9/30/18

C.3.b.iv.(2) ►Regulated Projects Reporting Table (part 2) –

Projects Approved During the Fiscal Year Reporting Period

(private projects)

Project Name

Project No.

Application Deemed Complete

Date12

Application

Final Approval

Date13

Source

Control

Measures14

Site Design

Measures15

Treatment Systems

Approved16

Type of Operation

& Maintenance

Responsibility

Mechanism17

Hydraulic

Sizing

Criteria18

Alternative

Compliance

Measures19/20

Alternative

Certification21

HM

Controls22/23

Private Projects

NA

12For private projects, state project application deemed complete date. If the project did not go through discretionary review, report the building permit issuance date. 13

For private projects, state project application final discretionary approval date. If the project did not go through discretionary review, report the building permit issuance date. 14List source control measures approved for the project. Examples include: properly designed trash storage areas; storm drain stenciling or signage; efficient landscape irrigation systems; etc. 15List site design measures approved for the project. Examples include: minimize impervious surfaces; conserve natural areas, including existing trees or other vegetation, and soils; construct sidewalks, walkways, and/or patios with permeable surfaces, etc. 16List all approved stormwater treatment system(s) to be installed onsite or at a joint stormwater treatment facility (e.g., flow through planter, bioretention facility, infiltration basin, etc.). 17List the legal mechanism(s) (e.g., O&M agreement with private landowner; O&M agreement with homeowners’ association; O&M by public entity, etc…) that have been or will be used to assign responsibility for the maintenance of the post-construction

stormwater treatment systems. 18See Provision C.3.d.i. “Numeric Sizing Criteria for Stormwater Treatment Systems” for list of hydraulic sizing design criteria. Enter the corresponding provision number of the appropriate criterion (i.e., 1.a., 1.b., 2.a., 2.b., 2.c., or 3). 19For Alternative Compliance at an offsite location in accordance with Provision C.3.e.i.(1), on a separate page, give a discussion of the alternative compliance site including the information specified in Provision C.3.b.v.(1)(m)(i) for the offsite project. 20For Alternative Compliance by paying in-lieu fees in accordance with Provision C.3.e.i.(2), on a separate page, provide the information specified in Provision C.3.b.v.(1)(m)(ii) for the Regional Project. 21Note whether a third party was used to certify the project design complies with Provision C.3.d. 22If HM control is not required, state why not. 23If HM control is required, state control method used (e.g., method to design and size device(s) or method(s) used to meet the HM Standard, and description of device(s) or method(s) used, such as detention basin(s), biodetention unit(s), regional detention

basin, or in-stream control).



FY 17-18 AR Form 3-8 9/30/18

C.3.b.iv.(2) ►Regulated Projects Reporting Table (part 2) –

Projects Approved During the Fiscal Year Reporting Period

(public projects)

Project

Name

Project

No.

Approval

Date24

Date Construction

Scheduled to Begin

Source Control

Measures25

Site Design

Measures26

Treatment Systems

Approved27

Operation & Maintenance

Responsibility Mechanism28

Hydraulic

Sizing Criteria29

Alternative

Compliance

Measures30/31

Alternative

Certification32

HM

Controls33/34

Public Projects

NA

Comments:

24For public projects, enter the plans and specifications approval date. 25List source control measures approved for the project. Examples include: properly designed trash storage areas; storm drain stenciling or signage; efficient landscape irrigation systems; etc. 26List site design measures approved for the project. Examples include: minimize impervious surfaces; conserve natural areas, including existing trees or other vegetation, and soils; construct sidewalks, walkways, and/or patios with permeable surfaces, etc. 27List all approved stormwater treatment system(s) to be installed onsite or at a joint stormwater treatment facility (e.g., flow through planter, bioretention facility, infiltration basin, etc.). 28List the legal mechanism(s) (e.g., maintenance plan for O&M by public entity, etc.) that have been or will be used to assign responsibility for the maintenance of the post-construction stormwater treatment systems. 29See Provision C.3.d.i. “Numeric Sizing Criteria for Stormwater Treatment Systems” for list of hydraulic sizing design criteria. Enter the corresponding provision number of the appropriate criterion (i.e., 1.a., 1.b., 2.a., 2.b., 2.c., or 3). 30For Alternative Compliance at an offsite location in accordance with Provision C.3.e.i.(1), on a separate page, give a discussion of the alternative compliance site including the information specified in Provision C.3.b.v.(1)(m)(i) for the offsite project. 31For Alternative Compliance by paying in-lieu fees in accordance with Provision C.3.e.i.(2), on a separate page, provide the information specified in Provision C.3.b.v.(1)(m)(ii) for the Regional Project. 32Note whether a third party was used to certify the project design complies with Provision C.3.d. 33If HM control is not required, state why not. 34If HM control is required, state control method used (e.g., method to design and size device(s) or method(s) used to meet the HM Standard, and description of device(s) or method(s) used, such as detention basin(s), biodetention unit(s), regional detention

basin, or in-stream control).


Permittee Name City of Hercules

FY 17-18 AR Form 3-9 9/30/18

C.3.h.v.(2). ►Table of Newly Installed35 Stormwater Treatment Systems and

Hydromodification Management (HM) Controls (Optional)

Fill in table below or attach your own table including the same information.

Name of Facility Address of Facility

Party Responsible36

For Maintenance

Type of

Treatment/HM

Control(s)

NA

35 “Newly Installed” includes those facilities for which the final installation inspection was performed during this reporting year. 36State the responsible operator for installed stormwater treatment systems and HM controls.



FY 17-18 AR Form 3-10 9/30/18

C.3.e.v.Special Projects Reporting Table

Reporting Period – July 1 2017 - June 30, 2018

Project

Name & No.

Permittee Address Application

Submittal

Date37

Status38

Description39 Site Total

Acreage

Gross

Density

DU/Acre

Density

FAR

Special

Project

Category40

LID

Treatment

Reduction

Credit

Available41

List of LID

Stormwater

Treatment

Systems42

List of Non-

LID

Stormwater

Treatment

Systems43

None

37Date that a planning application for the Special Project was submitted. 38 Indicate whether final discretionary approval is still pending or has been granted, and provide the date or version of the project plans upon which reporting is based. 39Type of project (commercial, mixed-use, residential), number of floors, number of units, type of parking, and other relevant information. 40 For each applicable Special Project Category, list the specific criteria applied to determine applicability. For each non-applicable Special Project Category, indicate n/a. 41For each applicable Special Project Category, state the maximum total LID Treatment Reduction Credit available. For Category C Special Projects also list the individual Location, Density, and Minimized Surface Parking Credits available. 42: List all LID stormwater treatment systems proposed. For each type, indicate the percentage of the total amount of runoff identified in Provision C.3.d. for the Special Project’s drainage area. 43List all non-LID stormwater treatment systems proposed. For each type of non-LID treatment system, indicate: (1) the percentage of the total amount of runoff identified in Provision C.3.d. for the Special Project's drainage area, and (2) whether the treatment system either meets minimum design criteria published by a government agency or received certification issued by a government

agency, and reference the applicable criteria or certification.



FY 17-18 AR Form 3-11 9/30/18

Special Projects Narrative No Special Projects



FY 17-18 AR Form 3-12 9/30/18

C.3.j.ii.(2) ► Table A - Public Projects Reviewed for Green

Infrastructure

Project Name and

Location44

Project Description Status45 GI

Included?46

Description of GI Measures

Considered and/or Proposed

or Why GI is Impracticable to Implement47

Restore Chelsea Wetlands Remove fill from a former

wetlands area and restore to

be a transitional area

between the flood plain and

Pinole Creek

Environmental

Certification

Yes Tidal grasslands to treat runoff and silt from

Pinole Creek

Refugio Lake Park

Improvements

Parking lot overlay Design No Parking Lot pavement maintenance

Refugio Valley Lake Retaining wall and Tennis

court backboard repair

Under construction No Structure repairs

Sidewalk Replacement

Project

Repair damaged CG&S and

replace slabs damaged by

tree roots

Ongoing No Repairs only

Annual Street Overlay Repair of street pavement Ongoing No Maintenance work within the existing

footprint

Restriping Project Project to renew street

pavement striping

Ongoing No Only involves restriping of streets

Grant Overlay Project

OBAG

Grant funded repaving

project

Under Construction No Too Late

West Bay Trail Funding for design and

permits, no construction

funding

Design Commenced No No funding allocated for GI

Fuel Oil Relocation Relocation of Kinder Morgan

and Shell Fuel Lines for new

transit loop retaining walls

Planned, however is

currently unfunded

No None, project is specific to relocate fuel lines

for a retaining wall

Track/Signal Work Railroad bridge, rail retaining

wall, and track and signal

work

Planned, however is

currently unfunded

NO None, work is specific to the rail lines

Initial Rail station Rail station building Planned, however is NO None, work is a rail station that would be

44 List each public project that is going through your agency’s process for identifying projects with green infrastructure potential. 45 Indicate status of project, such as: beginning design, under design (or X% design), projected completion date, completed final design date, etc. 46 Enter “Yes” if project will include GI measures, “No” if GI measures are impracticable to implement, or “TBD” if this has not yet been determined. 47 Provide a summary of how each public infrastructure project with green infrastructure potential will include green infrastructure measures to the maximum extent practicable during

the permit term. If review of the project indicates that implementation of green infrastructure measures is not practicable, provide the reasons why green infrastructure measures

are impracticable to implement.



FY 17-18 AR Form 3-13 9/30/18

currently unfunded regulated

Transit Loop Creekside park and transit

loop roadway and

promenade

Planned, however is

currently unfunded

NO Is a potential candidate project but no

design has been commenced

Trails, Parks and Plazas Civic park and park

elements.

Planned, however is

currently unfunded

No Is a potential candidate project but no

design has been commenced

Inspect and Repair Sewer

System

RWQCB compliance project

to repair I&I

Ongoing in Phases No No potential for green infrastructure

Wastewater Treatment Plant

Improvements

Expand treatment plant Under construction No No potential for green infrastructure

Rehabilitate Lift Stations Renovate city sewer lift

stations

In planning No No potential green infrastructure in an

equipment replacement project

C.3.j.ii.(2) ► Table B - Planned and/or Completed Green

Infrastructure Projects

Project Name and

Location48

Project Description Planning or

Implementation Status

Green Infrastructure Measures Included

NONE

48 List each planned (and expected to be funded) public and private green infrastructure project that is not also a Regulated Project as defined in Provision C.3.b.ii. Note that funding

for green infrastructure components may be anticipated but is not guaranteed to be available or sufficient.

FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.4 – Industrial and Commercial Site Controls


FY 17-18 AR Form 4-1 9/30/18

Section 4 – Provision C.4 Industrial and Commercial Site Controls


Summary:

Refer to the C.4. Industrial and Commercial Site Controls section of the countywide Program’s FY 17-18 Annual Report (if applicable) for a

description of activities of the countywide program and/or the BASMAA Municipal Operations Committee.

C.4.b.iii ► Potential Facilities List (i.e., List of All Facilities Requiring

Stormwater Inspections)

List below or attach your list of industrial and commercial facilities in your Inspection Plan to inspect that could reasonably be considered to cause

or contribute to pollution of stormwater runoff.

See attached Database of the Potential Facilities.

C.4.d.iii.(2)(a) & (c) ►Facility Inspections

Fill out the following table or attach a summary of the following information. Indicate your reporting methodology below.

X Permittee reports multiple discrete potential and actual discharges as one enforcement action.

Permittee reports the total number of discrete potential and actual discharges on each site.

Number

Total number of inspections conducted (C.4.d.iii.(2)(a)) 17

Violations, enforcement actions, or discreet number of potential and actual discharges resolved within 10 working

days or otherwise deemed resolved in a longer but still timely manner (C.4.d.iii.(2)(c)) 3

Comments: None



FY 17-18 AR Form 4-2 9/30/18

C.4.d.iii.(2)(b) ►Frequency and Type of Enforcement Conducted

Fill out the following table or attach a summary of the following information.

Enforcement Action

(as listed in ERP)49

Number of Enforcement Actions Taken

Level 1 Verbal Warning 3

Level 2 Notice of Violation 0

Level 3 Formal Enforcement 0

Level 4 Legal Action 0

Total 3

C.4.d.iii.(2)(d) ► Frequency of Potential and Actual Non-stormwater Discharges by Business

Category

Fill out the following table or attach a summary of the following information.

Business Category50

Number of Actual

Discharges

Number of Potential

Discharges

Commercial 0 0

Food Service 0 3

Property Mgmt. 0 0

C.4.d.iii.(2)(e) ►Non-Filers

List below or attach a list of the facilities required to have coverage under the Industrial General Permit but have not filed for coverage:

There were no industries identified as non-filers during scheduled inspections during this fiscal year.

49Agencies to list specific enforcement actions as defined in their ERPs. 50List your Program’s standard business categories.



FY 17-18 AR Form 4-3 9/30/18

C.4.e.iii ►Staff Training Summary

Training Name

Training

Dates Topics Covered

No. of

Industrial/

Commercial

Site

Inspectors in

Attendance

Percent of

Industrial/

Commercial

Site

Inspectors in

Attendance

No. of IDDE

Inspectors

in

Attendance

Percent of

IDDE

Inspectors

in

Attendance

C4 Annual

Training

Workshop

May 3, 2018 Elements of an effective enforcement

response plan

Unique aspects to industrial inspections

Mock inspection of an industrial facility

1 1 1 100%

Comments: None

FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.5 – Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination


FY 17-18 AR Form 5-1 9/30/18

Section 5 – Provision C.5 Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination


Provide background information, highlights, trends, etc.

Summary:

Refer to the C.5 Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination section of countywide program’s FY 17-18 Annual Report for description of activities at

the countywide or regional level.

C.5.c.iii ►Complaint and Spill Response Phone Number

Summary of any changes made during FY 17-18:

No Change

C.5.d.iii.(1), (2), (3) ►Spill and Discharge Complaint Tracking

Spill and Discharge Complaint Tracking (fill out the following table or include an attachment of the following information)

Number

Discharges reported (C.5.d.iii.(1)) 0

Discharges reaching storm drains and/or receiving waters (C.5.d.iii.(2))

Discharges resolved in a timely manner (C.5.d.iii.(3))

Comments:

None

FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.6 – Construction Site Controls


FY 17-18 AR Form 6-1 9/30/18

Section 6 – Provision C.6 Construction Site Controls

C.6.e.iii.(3)(a), (b), (c), (d) ►Site/Inspection Totals

Number of active Hillside

Sites (sites disturbing < 1

acre of soil requiring storm

water runoff quality

inspection) (C.6.e.iii.3.a)

Number of High Priority

Sites (sites disturbing < 1

acre of soil requiring storm

water runoff quality

inspection) (C.6.e.iii. 3.c)

Number of sites disturbing ≥ 1 acre

of soil

(C.6.e.iii.3.b)

Total number of storm water runoff quality

inspections conducted (include only Hillside Sites,

High Priority Sites and sites disturbing 1 acre or

more)

(C.6.e.iii. 3.d)

0 0 2 20

Comments:

C.6.e.iii.(3)(e) ►Construction Related Storm Water Enforcement

Actions

Enforcement Action

(as listed in ERP)51

Number Enforcement Actions Issued

Level 152 Verbal Notice 0

Level 2 Notice of Violation 0

Level 3 Formal Enforcement 0

Level 4 Legal Action 0

Total 0

51Agencies should list the specific enforcement actions as defined in their ERPs. 52For example, Enforcement Level 1 may be Verbal Warning.



FY 17-18 AR Form 6-2 9/30/18

C.6.e.iii.(3)(f), ►Illicit Discharges

Number

Number of illicit discharges, actual and those inferred through evidence at hillside sites, high priority sites and sites that

disturb 1 acre or more of land (C.6.e.iii. 3.f) 0

C.6.e.iii.(3)(g) ► Corrective Actions

Indicate your reporting methodology below.

X Permittee reports multiple discrete potential and actual discharges as one enforcement action.

Permittee reports the total number of discrete potential and actual discharges on each site.

Number

Enforcement actions or discrete potential and actual discharges fully corrected within 10 business days after

violations are discovered or otherwise considered corrected in a timely period (C.6.e.iii. .3.g)

0

Comments:

None

C.6.e.iii.(4) ►Evaluation of Inspection Data

Describe your evaluation of the tracking data and data summaries and provide information on the evaluation results (e.g., data trends, typical

BMP performance issues, comparisons to previous years, etc.).

Description:

Evaluation of the inspection data shows clear and consistent actions from the City’s contract inspector to enforce all of the necessary BMPs and

the City ordinance. All of the actions for this reporting year fall under the Level 1 Enforcement Action category. Based on the review of the

inspection data, all of the warning notices were addressed and resolved.

C.6.e.iii.(4) ►Evaluation of Inspection Program Effectiveness

Describe what appear to be your program’s strengths and weaknesses, and identify needed improvements, including education and outreach.

Description:

The City uses contract inspectors to perform all C.6 stormwater quality inspections. For this reporting year, the City had two active sites, a roadway

project, and a residential development. A strength of the program is that our inspectors are regularly on the projects sites. They routinely make

recommendations to contractors to improve their stormwater site management to avoid future stormwater violations.



FY 17-18 AR Form 6-3 9/30/18

Refer to the C.6 Construction Site Control section of countywide program’s FY 17-18 Annual Report for a description of activities at the countywide

or regional level.

C.6.f.iii ►Staff Training Summary

Training Name Training Dates Topics Covered

No. of Inspectors

in Attendance

Contra Costa Clean Water Program C.6 Training April, 17, 2018 Learn the principles of stormwater protection

at construction sites

Refresher on C.6 requirements

Information on BMPs and resources

Inspection practices, documentation and

annual reporting

1

FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.7 – Public Information and Outreach


FY 17-18 AR Form 7-1 9/30/18

Section 7 – Provision C.7. Public Information and Outreach

C.7.b.i.1 ►Outreach Campaign

Summarize outreach campaign. Include details such as messages, creative developed, and outreach media used. The detailed outreach

campaign report may be included as an attachment. If outreach campaign is being done by participation in a countywide or regional program,

refer to the separate countywide or regional Annual Report.

Summary:

Refer to Section 7 in the CCCWP’s FY 17/18 Annual Report for a summary of activities related to the planning and development of an Outreach

Campaign.

C.7.c. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Education

No Change



FY 17-18 AR Form 7-2 9/30/18

C.7.d ►Public Outreach and Citizen Involvement Events

Describe general approach to event selection. Provide a list of outreach materials and giveaways distributed.

Use the following table for reporting and evaluating public outreach events

Event Details Description (messages, audience) Evaluation of Effectiveness

May 2018 “Bring Back the Natives” Garden Tour This is a tour to encourage landscaping

using native plants, minimizing pesticide

usage, and conserving water for county

residents.

Refer to the CCCWP’s FY 17-18 Annual Report, Section 7 Public Information and

Outreach for a full description of the event.

Refer to the CCCWP’s FY 17-18 Annual

Report, Section 7 Public Information and

Outreach for an evaluation of the

effectiveness of the event.

Our Water Our World

(Tabling/Outreach at Stores)

Includes Tabling/Outreach Events at retail

outlets.




Refer to the CCCWP’s FY 17-18 Annual Report,

Section 7 Public Information and Outreach for

an evaluation of the effectiveness of the event.

Website: CCCleanWater.org Community

Calendar






an evaluation of the effectiveness of the event.

Volunteer Field Monitoring Equipment

Maintenance Support



Outreach for a full description of this effort.



an evaluation of the effectiveness of this effort.



FY 17-18 AR Form 7-3 9/30/18

C.7.e. ►Watershed Stewardship Collaborative Efforts

Summarize watershed stewardship collaborative efforts and/or refer to a regional report that provides details. Describe the level of effort and

support given (e.g., funding only, active participation etc.). State efforts undertaken and the results of these efforts. If this activity is done regionally

refer to a regional report.

Evaluate effectiveness by describing the following:

Efforts undertaken

Major accomplishments

Summary:

Please see the CCCWP’s Fiscal Year 2017/18 Annual Report, Section 7 Public Information and Outreach for a full description of BASMAA and the

CCCWP’s encouragement and support of various Watershed Stewardship Collaborative Efforts, which includes involvement in the Community

Watershed Stewardship Grant Program, sponsorship of the Bringing Back the Natives Garden Tour, CCCWP-staff participation in the Contra Costa

Watershed Forum, support of the Green Business Program, and the Program’s website CCCleanWater.org Community Calendar.

C.7.f. ►School-Age Children Outreach

Summarize school-age children outreach programs implemented. A detailed report may be included as an attachment.

Use the following table for reporting school-age children outreach efforts.

Program Details Focus & Short Description

Number of

Students/Teachers

reached Evaluation of Effectiveness

Mr. Funnelhead School,

City/County Events and TV Ads

Refer to the Fiscal Year 2017-18 Group

Program Annual Report, Section C.7

for activity description.

Refer to the Fiscal

Year 2017-18 Group

Program Annual

Report, Section C.7

for details on number

of students/teachers

reached.

Refer to the Fiscal Year 2017-18 Group

Program Annual Report, Section C.7 for

evaluation of effectiveness.

FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.9 – Pesticides Toxicity Controls


FY 17-18 AR Form 9-1 9/30/18

Section 9 – Provision C.9 Pesticides Toxicity Controls

C.9.a. ►Implement IPM Policy or Ordinance

Is your municipality implementing its IPM Policy/Ordinance and Standard Operating Procedures? X Yes No

If no, explain:

Report implementation of IPM BMPs by showing trends in quantities and types of pesticides used, and suggest reasons for increases in use of

pesticides that threaten water quality, specifically organophosphates, pyrethroids, carbamates fipronil, indoxacarb, diuron, and diamides. A

separate report can be attached as evidence of your implementation.

Trends in Quantities and Types of Pesticide Active Ingredients Used53

Pesticide Category and Specific Pesticide Active Ingredient

Used

Amount54

FY 15-16 FY 16-17 FY 17-18 FY 18-19 FY 19-20 FY 20-21

Organophosphates 0 0 0

Pyrethroids (see footnote #57 for list of active ingredients) 0 0 0

Carbamates 0 0 0

Fipronil - Termidor SC 48oz. 29oz. 0

Indoxacarb Reporting

not required

in FY 15-16

0 0

Diuron Reporting

not required

in FY 15-16

0 0

Diamides Reporting

not required

in FY 15-16

0 0

IPM Tactics and Strategies Used:

53Includes all municipal structural and landscape pesticide usage by employees and contractors. 54Weight or volume of the active ingredient, using same units for the product each year. Please specify units used. The active ingredients in any pesticide are listed on the label. The

list of active ingredients that need to be reported in the pyrethroids class includes: metofluthrin, bifenthrin, cyfluthrin, beta-cyfluthrin, cypermethrin, deltamethrin, esfenvalerate, lambdacyhalothrin, and permethrin.



FY 17-18 AR Form 9-2 9/30/18

City contractors use IPM strategies regularly. This has been recorded in the pesticide usage reports provided to the state. Contractors use products

containing non-toxic alternatives. For example the use of Rosemary & Peppermint Oils are used at City owned facilities in lieu of toxic materials.

Additionally, Terminex reports they did not use any Fipronil this reporting year at structural sites owned/operated by the City.

C.9.b ►Train Municipal Employees

Enter the number of employees that applied or used pesticides (including herbicides) within the scope of their duties this reporting

year. 0

Enter the number of these employees who received training on your IPM policy and IPM standard operating procedures within this

reporting year. 0

Enter the percentage of municipal employees who apply pesticides who have received training in the IPM policy and IPM standard

operating procedures within this reporting year. 0

Type of Training:

N/A

C.9.c ►Require Contractors to Implement IPM Did your municipality contract with any pesticide service provider in the reporting year, for either

landscaping or structural pest control? X Yes No

If yes, did your municipality evaluate the contractor’s list of pesticides and amounts of active ingredients

used? X Yes No,

If your municipality contracted with any pesticide service provider, briefly describe how contractor compliance with IPM Policy/Ordinance and

SOPs was monitored

City contractors use IPM strategies regularly. This has been recorded in the pesticide usage reports provided to the state. Contractors use products

containing non-toxic alternatives. For example the use of Rosemary & Peppermint Oils are used at City owned facilities in lieu of toxic materials.

Additionally, Fipronil was reported as not being used.



FY 17-18 AR Form 9-3 9/30/18

C.9.d ►Interface with County Agricultural Commissioners

Did your municipality communicate with the County Agricultural Commissioner to: (a) get input and assistance on

urban pest management practices and use of pesticides or (b) inform them of water quality issues related to

pesticides,

Yes X

No

If yes, summarize the communication. If no, explain.

Refer to the CCCWP’s FY 17-18 Annual Report, Section C.9 Pesticide Toxicity Controls for a summary of the CCCWP’s communication with Contra

Costa County Agricultural Commissioner. Summarize any local communication with the County Agricultural Commissioner here.

Did your municipality report any observed or citizen-reported violations of pesticide regulations (e.g., illegal handling

and applications of pesticides) associated with stormwater management, particularly the California Department of

Pesticide Regulation (DPR) surface water protection regulations for outdoor, nonagricultural use of pyrethroid

pesticides by any person performing pest control for hire.

Yes

X

No

If yes, provide a summary of improper pesticide usage reported to the County Agricultural Commissioner and follow-up actions taken to correct

any violations. A separate report can be attached as your summary.

C.9.e.ii (1) ►Public Outreach: Point of Purchase

Provide a summary of public outreach at point of purchase, and any measurable awareness and behavior changes resulting from outreach (here

or in a separate report); OR reference a report of a regional effort for public outreach in which your agency participates.

Summary:

See the C.9 Pesticides Toxicity Control section of Countywide Program’s FY 17-18 Annual Report for information on point of purchase public

outreach conducted countywide and regionally.

C.9.e.ii (2) ►Public Outreach: Pest Control Contracting Outreach Provide a summary of outreach to residents who use or contract for structural pest control and landscape professionals); AND/OR reference a

report of a regional effort for outreach to residents who hire pest control and landscape professionals in which your agency participates.

Summary:

See the C.9 Pesticides Toxicity Control section of Countywide Program’s FY 17-18 Annual Report for information on point of purchase public

outreach conducted countywide and regionally.



FY 17-18 AR Form 9-4 9/30/18

C.9.e.ii.(3) ►Public Outreach: Pest Control Operators

Provide a summary of public outreach to pest control operators and landscapers and reduced pesticide use (here or in a separate report);

AND/OR reference a report of a regional effort for outreach to pest control operators and landscapers in which your agency participates.

Summary:

See the C.9 Pesticides Toxicity Control section of Program’s FY 17-18 Annual Report for a summary of our participation in and contributions towards

countywide and regional public outreach to pest control operators and landscapers to reduce pesticide use.

C.9.f ►Track and Participate in Relevant Regulatory Processes

Summarize participation efforts, information submitted, and how regulatory actions were affected; AND/OR reference a regional report that

summarizes regional participation efforts, information submitted, and how regulatory actions were affected.

Summary:

During FY 17-18, we participated in regulatory processes related to pesticides through contributions to the countywide Program, BASMAA and

CASQA. For additional information, see the Regional Report submitted by BASMAA on behalf of all MRP Permittees.

FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.10 – Provision C.10 Trash Load Reduction


FY 17-18 AR Form 10-1 9/30/18

Section 10 - Provision C.10 Trash Load Reduction

55 See Appendix 10-1 for changes between 2009 and FY 17-18 in trash generation by TMA as a result of Full Capture Systems and Other Measures.

C.10.a.i ► Trash Load Reduction Summary

For population-based Permittees, provide the overall trash reduction percentage achieved to-date within the jurisdictional area of your

municipality that generates problematic trash levels (i.e., Very High, High or Moderate trash generation). Base the reduction percentage on the

information presented in C.10.b i-iv and C.10.e.i-ii. Provide a discussion of the calculation used to produce the reduction percentage

Trash Load Reductions

Percent Trash Reduction in All Trash Management Areas (TMAs) due to Trash Full Capture Systems (as reported C.10.b.i) 64%

Percent Trash Reduction in all TMAs due to Control Measures Other than Trash Full Capture Systems (as reported in C.10.b.ii)55 0%

Percent Trash Reduction due to Jurisdictional-wide Source Control Actions (as reported in C.10.b.iv)1 5%

SubTotal for Above Actions 69%

Trash Offsets (Optional)

Offset Associated with Additional Creek and Shoreline Cleanups (as reported in C.10.e.i) 0%

Offset Associated with Direct Trash Discharges (as reported in C.10.e.ii) 0%

Total (Jurisdictional-wide) % Trash Load Reduction through FY 2017-18 69%



FY 17-18 AR Form 10-2 9/30/18

Discussion of Trash Load Reduction Calculation:

The City reported a 69% trash load reduction in this year’s Annual Report. Because the City did not achieve mandatory performance guideline of

70% by July 1, 2017, a Trash Action Plan was prepared and submitted to the Water Board to document the description and schedule of additional

trash load reduction control actions that would be implemented to attain 70% percent reduction.

During FY 17-18, the City began implementation of the action plan.

Conducting a Citywide Trash Full Capture Evaluation C.10.b.ii (Completed) – The City conducted a City-wide Full Capture reconnaissance

of all inlets in Medium and High Trash Generation Areas. This action identified 31 eligible inlets for installation of localized Full Trash Capture

Devices. During this reporting year, this task was completed and 31 units were installed.

Updating the City Stormwater Ordinance (Completed) – In addition to the Full Trash Capture installation plan, City staff updated the City’s

Ordinance. This was brought to Council and approved during this reporting year.

Securing Funding for Future Trash Control Measure Implementation (Completed) – The City has completed this task and has installed full trash capture devices at City owned inlets in the ROW with operation and maintenance included. This includes the 31 inlets mentioned

above. All of those devices are installed.

The City began implementation of it’s action plan and has seen success, the load reduction for FY 17-18 is at 69% with less than 30 acres left to

treat in order to meet 100% compliance. The City of Hercules is dedicated to reducing trash in the City that is discharged to their MS4 and will

continue to work towards full compliance.



FY 17-18 AR Form 10-3 9/30/18

C.10.a.ii.b ► Trash Generation Area Management - Identification of

Private Drainages >10,000 ft2

State (Y/N) if your agency completed Permit Provision C.10.a.ii.b. If Yes, attach a map (or other record) or provide a website link to a map (or

other record) of the location of lands >10,000 ft2 (in Very High, High, and Moderate trash generation areas) that are plumbed directly to the

Permittee’s storm drain systems, including trash control status of these areas. If No, provide explanation of why the provision was not completed

and the estimated date when the provision will be completed.

Did your agency complete Permit Provision C.10.a.ii.b? X Yes No NA

If No, provide explanation and estimated completion date:

Description of the process used to identify applicable areas and their trash control status:

To satisfy this requirement, an initial screening was conducted to identify applicable lands using Contra Costa Clean Water Program's ArcGIS on

line application. As part of the screening process, lands under full trash capture, non-jurisdictional, or classified as low-trash generating were

excluded. Single family homes were also excluded since they did not meet the required criteria. Remaining contiguous lands that were greater

than 10,000 square feet were identified as potential Private Lands Drainage Areas (PLDAs).

Desktop analyses of the potential PLDAs were then conducted. Potential PLDAs were excluded if, through the desktop analyses, these lands were

identified as having less than 10,000 square feet of applicable area once building footprints were deducted or no private storm drain inlets are on

site. Potential PLDAs were also excluded based on certain other factors such as the identified lands are open space or, in very few particular

cases, the lands have a low trash generation rate as based on results of recent assessments. Once the desktop analyses was completed, preliminary PLDAs were created from all remaining potential PLDAs. In rare circumstances, preliminary PLDAs were also created from areas that

the initial screening had failed to identify.

For FY 2018/19, it is anticipated that preliminary PLDAs will be visually assessed to confirm or correct trash generation rates and the location of

private storm drain inlets will be mapped. All preliminary PLDAs that still satisfy the criteria once the field analyses are completed will be

designated as PLDAs. Appropriate follow up action will be taken such as outreach to applicable property owners and status will be tracked.

URL link to Map: http://arcg.is/1eGu15



FY 17-18 AR Form 10-4 9/30/18

C.10.a.iii ► Mandatory Trash Full Capture Systems

Provide the following:

1) Total number and types of full capture systems (publicly and privately-owned) installed prior to FY 17-18, during FY 17-18, and to-date,

including inlet-based and large flow-through or end-of-pipe systems, and qualifying low impact development (LID) required by permit

provision C.3.

2) Total land area (acres) treated by full capture systems for population-based Permittees and total number of systems for non-population

based Permittees compared to the total required by the permit.

Type of System # of Systems Areas Treated

(Acres)

Installed Prior to FY 17-18

HDS Units 9 284

LID Facilities 1 10

Installed in FY 17-18

Connector Pipe Screens 6 16

Baskets 25 6

Total for all Systems Installed To-date 41 317

Treatment Acreage Required by Permit (Population-based Permittees) 11

Total # of Systems Required by Permit (Non-population-based Permittees) N/A

FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.10 – Trash Load Reduction


FY 17-18 AR Form 10-5 9/30/18

C.10.b.i ► Trash Reduction - Full Capture Systems


1) Jurisdictional-wide trash reduction in FY 17-18 attributable to trash full capture systems implemented in each TMA;

2) The total number of full capture systems installed to-date in your jurisdiction;

3) The percentage of systems in FY 17-18 that exhibited significant plugged/blinded screens or were >50% full when inspected or maintained;

4) A narrative summary of any maintenance issues and the corrective actions taken to avoid future full capture system performance issues; and

5) A certification that each full capture system is operated and maintained to meet the full capture system requirements in the permit.

TMA Jurisdiction-wide

Reduction (%)

Total # of Full

Capture

Systems

% of Systems Exhibiting

Plugged/Blinded Screens

or >50% full in FY 17-18

Summary of Maintenance Issues and Corrective Actions

1 42.7 41 0 HDS Units were serviced. All of the units exhibited normal

sediment and trash collection. Trash was separated out from the

sediment removed by the Vactor truck.

2 10.7

3 0.1

4 10.7

5 0.0

6 0.0

7 0.0

8 0.0

9 0.0

Total 64.1

Certification Statement: The City of Hercules certifies that a full capture system maintenance and operation program is currently being

implemented to maintain all applicable systems in manner that meets the full capture system requirements included in the Permit.



FY 17-18 AR Form 10-6 9/30/18

C.10.b.ii ► Trash Reduction – Other Trash Management Actions (PART A)

Provide a summary of trash control actions other than full capture systems or jurisdictional source controls that were implemented within each

TMA, including the types of actions, levels and areal extent of implementation, and whether actions are new, including initiation date.

TMA Summary of Trash Control Actions Other than Full Capture Systems

1

Street sweeping within this TMA was increased from 2x/monthly to weekly in 2015. If visual assessment conclude that additional

actions are required, the City plans to send anti-littering notifications to property owners or increase storm drain inspection and

cleaning from 1x/annually to 2x/annually.

2

Street sweeping within this TMA was increased from 2x/monthly to weekly in 2015. If visual assessment conclude that additional

actions are required, the City plans to send anti-littering notifications to property owners or increase storm drain inspection and


3

Street sweeping within this TMA was increased from 2x/monthly to weekly in 2015. Daily litter pickup is also conducted by City

staff, work alternative program and landscape maintenance contractors. If visual assessment conclude that additional actions

are required, the City plans improve trash bin management within and around the park or increase storm drain inspection and


4 LID Facility

5 No action taken.

6

The City is involved in the Trash Abatement Initiatives and Partnership between West County Cities/Contra Costa County and the

West County Unified School District. The partnership allows the cities and the school district to communicate and combine efforts in

reducing trash surrounding schools. The schools in Hercules have classroom programs that educate the students regarding trash

and recycling. School District staff regularly conducts litter pickup within school sites. In addition, the street sweeping along the

frontage of the Hercules Middle/High School was increased from 2x/monthly to weekly. Schools have been changed to non-

jurisdictional.

7 No action taken.

8

Increased on-land litter pickup efforts by City staff, work alternative program and landscape maintenance contractors. If visual

assessment conclude that additional actions are required, the City plans improve trash bin management within and around the

park.

9 No action taken.



FY 17-18 AR Form 10-7 9/30/18

Summary of Trash Control Measures Other than Full Capture Devices:

Street Sweeping: Include a description of any enhancements or new actions implemented after the MRP 1.0 effective date (i.e., December

2009). Identify portions of the TMA where enhanced street sweeping (i.e., increased sweeping frequency) and parking enforcement above

2009 levels was implemented.

On-land Cleanup: Include a description of on-land cleanup activities that began after the MRP 1.0 effective date (i.e., December 2009) and

continued into FY 17-18, including any enhancements or new actions implemented in FY 17-18. Describe if these actions are Permittee or

volunteer-led.

Partial Capture Devices: Provide a description of devices installed after the MRP 1.0 effective date (i.e., December 2009). Describe the level

of maintenance conducted per device types.

Storm Drain Inlet Cleaning: Describe storm drain inlet maintenance activities implemented after the MRP 1.0 effective date (i.e., December

2009) and continued in FY 17-18, including any enhancements or new maintenance activities implemented in FY 17-18. For new/enhanced

actions, include the number of inlets where enhanced maintenance occurred, and the increased frequency of maintenance.

Uncovered Loads: Describe activities designed to reduce trash from uncovered loads that began after the MRP 1.0 effective date (i.e.,

December 2009) and continued in FY 17-18, including any enhancements or new actions implemented in FY 17-18. Describe the types of

actions implemented including new or redirected enforcement efforts to increase the focus towards new or enhanced actions.

Anti-littering and illegal dumping enforcement activities: Describe anti-littering and illegal dumping enforcement activities began after to

the MRP 1.0 effective date (i.e., December 2009) and continued in FY 17-18, and any enhancements or new actions implemented in FY 17-

18. Include any new or redirected enforcement efforts to increase the focus towards new or enhanced actions. Describe the number of

citations or other correction actions accomplished this year, and compare with previous years. Indicate how anti-littering and illegal

dumping enforcement records are kept, and how they may be retrieved for audit.

Improved Trash Bin/Container Management: Describe activities designed to improve trash bin/container management that began after the

MRP1.0 effective date (i.e., December 2009) and continued in FY 17-18, and any enhancements or new actions implemented in FY 17-18.

Include any new or redirected efforts to increase the focus towards these new or enhanced actions.

Other Types of Actions: Describe activities designed after the MRP effective date (i.e., December 2009) and continued in FY 17-18, and any

enhancements or new (post December 2009 effective date) actions implemented in FY 17-18.



FY 17-18 AR Form 10-8 9/30/18

C.10.b.ii ► Trash Reduction – Other Trash Management Actions (PART B)


1) A summary of the on-land visual assessments in each TMA (or control measure area), including the street miles or acres available for

assessment (i.e., those associated with VH, H, or M trash generation areas not treated by full capture systems), the street miles or acres

assessed, the % of available street miles or acres assessed, and the average number of assessments conducted per site within the TMA; and

2) Percent jurisdictional-wide trash reduction in FY 17-18 attributable to trash management actions other than full capture systems implemented

in each TMA; OR

3) Indicate that no on-land visual assessments were performed.

If no on-land visual assessments were performed, check here

and state why: X

Explanation: The City of Hercules is reporting 100% of it’s claimed reduction

with full trash capture systems for the reporting year.

TMA ID

or (as applicable)

Control Measure Area

Total Street Miles56 or

Acres Available for

Assessment

Summary of On-land Visual Assessments

Jurisdictional-wide

Reduction (%) Street Miles or Acres

Assessed

% of Available Street

Miles or Acres

Assessed

Avg. # of Assessments

Conducted at Each Site

1 0.01 0.00 0.00 0 0.0

2 0.54 0.00 0.00 0 0.0

3* 0.00 NA NA NA 0.0

4* 0.00 NA NA NA 0.0

5* 0.00 NA NA NA 0.0

6 0.10 0.00 0.00 0 0.0

7* 0.00 NA NA NA 0.0

8* 0.00 NA NA NA 0.0

9* 0.00 NA NA NA 0.0

Total 0 0 0 0 0

56 Linear feet are defined as the street length and do not include street median curbs.



FY 17-18 AR Form 10-9 9/30/18

C.10.b.iv ► Trash Reduction – Source Controls

Provide a description of each jurisdictional-wide trash source control action implemented to-date. For each control action, identify the trash

reduction evaluation method(s) used to demonstrate on-going reductions, summarize the results of the evaluation(s), and estimate the

associated reduction of trash within your jurisdictional area. Note: There is a maximum of 10% total credit for source controls.

Source Control

Action

Summary Description &

Dominant Trash Sources and Types Targeted Evaluation/Enforcement Method(s)

Summary of

Evaluation/Enforcement

Results To-date

% Reduction

Single-use

Plastic Bag

Ordinance or

Policy

Adopted on September 9th 2014, Single-use

Bag Ordinance regulates the use of plastic

and recyclable pager carryout bags and

promotes the use of reusable bags.

With the current staffing available

within the City, evaluations and

assessments of the ordinance

have not been implemented to

date. Outreach and evaluation is

something the City would like to

be able to gather information on. City staff has reached out to

neighboring municipalities to

gather information on the finding

that they have from their

evaluation programs.

Per the Environmental Impact

Report conducted by

RecycleMore the Single-Use

Bag Ordinance would reduce

single-use plastic bags by 95%;

staff is proposing a more

moderate 75% reduction for this reporting period. This is

inline with other municipalities

that are neighbors to Hercules.

Based on the 75% anticipated

single use bag reduction, and

the EIR projection of 95%

assumed compliance rate,

Hercules calculates a 5% (8% x

75% x 95%) trash load

reduction attributable to the

implementation of the Single-

Use Bag Ordinance.

5%



FY 17-18 AR Form 10-10 9/30/18

C.10.b.iv ► Trash Reduction – Source Controls

Provide a description of each jurisdictional-wide trash source control action implemented to-date. For each control action, identify the trash

reduction evaluation method(s) used to demonstrate on-going reductions, summarize the results of the evaluation(s), and estimate the

associated reduction of trash within your jurisdictional area. Note: There is a maximum of 10% total credit for source controls.

Expanded

Polystyrene

Food Service

Ware

Ordinance or

Policy

Adopted on May 13th 2008, the Expanded

Polystyrene Food Service Ware Ordinance

prohibits the use or distribution of

expanded polystyrene utensils.

Per the Environmental Impact

Report conducted by

RecycleMore the Single-Use Bag

Ordinance would reduce single-

use plastic bags by 95%; staff is

proposing a more moderate 75%

reduction for this reporting

period. This is inline with other

municipalities that are neighbors

to Hercules.

Based on the 75% anticipated

single use bag reduction, and

the EIR projection of 95%

assumed compliance rate,

Hercules calculates a 5% (8% x

75% x 95%) trash load reduction

attributable to the

implementation of the Single-Use

Bag Ordinance.

The City has performed a brief

review of other neighboring

Municipalities that indicates

compliance with the

Ordinance to be ranging from

75-90%. The City of Hercules is

not looking to take a credit for

this ban in the percent

reduction although the City

does feel that this ban has had

beneficial impacts on the

percent reduction

0%

C.10.b.v ► Trash Reduction – Receiving Water Monitoring

Report on the progress of developing and testing your agency’s trash receiving water monitoring program.

Guidance:

Please refer to the Countywide Program's FY 17-18 Annual Report for the Progress Report on the Receiving Water Trash Monitoring Program Plan.



FY 17-18 AR Form 10-11 9/30/18

Comments: The City of Hercules no longer has access to the Hot Spot area. The land has been sold off to a developer and is private property. It is

recommended that a new Hot Spot location be defined. The City has some options they are looking at that include the Refugio Creek corridor across

from the High School. Additionally the City is looking to work with Earth Team to get a higher level of involvement in the creek ‘s watershed. The City

is looking to work with the Program and the contract consultant – ADH to relocate the Hot Spot area going forward.

C.10.c ► Trash Hot Spot Cleanups

Provide the FY 17-18 cleanup date and volume of trash removed during each MRP-required Trash Hot Spot cleanup during each fiscal year listed.

Indicate whether the site was a new site in FY 17-18.

Trash Hot Spot

New Site in

FY 17-18

(Y/N)

FY 17-18

Cleanup Date(s)

Volume of Trash Removed (cubic yards)

FY 2013-14 FY 2014-15 FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18

3900 San Pablo Ave N 2cy 2cy 1.5cy Please see

comments



FY 17-18 AR Form 10-12 9/30/18

C.10.d ►Long-Term Trash Load Reduction Plan

Provide descriptions of significant revisions made to your Long-term Trash Load Reduction Plan submitted to the Water Board in February 2014.

Describe significant changes made to primary or secondary trash management areas (TMA), baseline trash generation maps, control measures,

or time schedules identified in your plan. Indicate whether your baseline trash generation map was revised and if so what information was

collected to support the revision. If your baseline trash generation map was revised, attach it to your Annual Report.

Description of Significant Revision Associated

TMA

City corporation yard and two private industrial parcels are low generating parcel and were removed from TMA#5. TMA #5

Caltrans corporation yard is non-jurisdictional and was removed from TMA#5. TMA #5

K-12 public schools has been reclassified as non-jurisdictional and removed from TMA#6. TMA #6



FY 17-18 AR Form 10-13 9/30/18

C.10.e. ► Trash Reduction Offsets (Optional)

Provide a summary description of each offset program implemented, the volume of trash removed, and the offset claimed in FY 17-18. Also, for

additional creek and shoreline cleanups, describe the number and frequency of cleanups conducted, and the locations and cleanup dates. For

direct discharge control programs approved by the Water Board Executive Officer, also describe the results of the assessments conducted in

receiving waters to demonstrate the effectiveness of the control program. Include an Appendix that provides the calculations and data used to

determine the trash reduction offset.

Offset Program Summary Description of Actions and Assessment Results

Volume of Trash (CY)

Removed/Controlled

in FY 17-18

Offset

(% Jurisdiction-wide

Reduction)

Additional Creek

and Shoreline

Cleanups

(Max 10% Offset)

N/A N/A 0%

Direct Trash

Discharge

Controls

(Max 15% Offset)

N/A N/A 0%



FY 17-18 AR Form 10-14 9/30/18

Appendix 10-1. Baseline trash generation and areas addressed by full capture systems and other control measures in Fiscal Year 17-18.

TMA

2009 Baseline Trash Generation

(Acres)

Trash Generation (Acres) in FY 17-18 After

Accounting for Full Capture Systems

Jurisdiction-

wide

Reduction via

Full Capture Systems (%)

Trash Generation (Acres) in FY 17-18

After Accounting for Full Capture Systems and

Other Control Measures

Jurisdiction-

wide

Reduction via

Other Control Measures (%)

Jurisdiction-wide

Reduction via Full

Capture AND

Other Control

Measures (%) L M H VH Total L M H VH Total L M H VH Total

1 0 0 11 0 11 10 0 2 0 11 42.7 10 0 2 0 11 0.0 42.7

2 0 30 0 0 30 10 20 0 0 30 10.7 10 20 0 0 30 0.0 10.7

3 20 0 0 0 20 20 0 0 0 20 0.1 20 0 0 0 20 0.0 0.1

4 2 10 0 0 12 12 0 0 0 12 10.7 12 0 0 0 12 0.0 10.7

5 8 0 0 0 8 8 0 0 0 8 0.0 8 0 0 0 8 0.0 0.0

6 0 6 0 0 6 0 6 0 0 6 0.0 0 6 0 0 6 0.0 0.0

7 5 0 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 5 0.0 5 0 0 0 5 0.0 0.0

8 10 0 0 0 10 10 0 0 0 10 0.0 10 0 0 0 10 0.0 0.0

9 3751 0 0 0 3751 3751 0 0 0 3751 0.0 3751 0 0 0 3751 0.0 0.0

Totals 3797 46 11 0 3855 3826 27 2 0 3855 64.1 3826 27 2 0 3855 0.0 64.1

Note: “NA” indicates that the TMA has no moderate, high or very high trash generating areas (i.e., all low trash generation and/or non-jurisdictional) and therefore no additional trash control measures are needed.

FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.11 – Mercury Controls


FY 17-18 AR Form 11-1 9/30/18

Section 11 - Provision C.11 Mercury Controls

C.11.a ► Implement Control Measures to Achieve Mercury Load Reductions

C.11.b ► Assess Mercury Load Reductions from Stormwater

See the Countywide Program’s FY 2017-18 Annual Report for updated information on:

Documentation of mercury control measures implemented in our agency’s jurisdictional area for which load reductions will be reported

and the associated management areas;

A description of how the BASMAA Interim Accounting Methodology57 was used to calculate the mercury load reduced by each control

measure implemented in our agency’s jurisdictional area and the calculation results (i.e., the estimated mercury load reduced by each

control measure);

Supporting data and information necessary to substantiate the load reduction estimates; and

For Executive Officer approval, any refinements, if necessary, to the measurement and estimation methodologies to assess mercury load

reductions in the subsequent permit.

C.11.c ► Plan and Implement Green Infrastructure to Reduce Mercury Loads

See the Countywide Program’s FY 2017-18 Annual Report for information on the quantitative relationship between green infrastructure

implementation and mercury load reductions, including all data used and a full description of models and model inputs relied on to establish this

relationship.

C.11.e ► Implement a Risk Reduction Program

A summary of Program and regional accomplishments for this sub-provision are included in the Countywide Program’s FY 2017-18 Annual Report.

57BASMAA 2017. Interim Accounting Methodology for TMDL Loads Reduced, Version 1.0. Prepared for BASMAA by Geosyntec Consultants and EOA,

Inc., September 19, 2016.

FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.12 – PCBs Controls


FY 17-18 AR Form 12-1 9/30/18

Section 12 - Provision C.12 PCBs Controls

C.12.a ► Implement Control Measures to Achieve PCBs Load Reductions

C.12.b ► Assess PCBs Load Reductions from Stormwater

See the Countywide Program’s FY 2017-18 Annual Report for:

Documentation of PCBs control measures implemented in our agency’s jurisdictional area for which load reductions will be reported and

the associated management areas;

A description of how the BASMAA Interim Accounting Methodology58 was used to calculate the PCBs load reduced by each control

measure implemented in our agency’s jurisdictional area and the calculation results (i.e., the estimated PCBs load reduced by each

control measure);

Supporting data and information necessary to substantiate the load reduction estimates; and

For Executive Officer approval, any refinements, if necessary, to the measurement and estimation methodologies to assess PCBs load

reductions in the subsequent permit.

C.12.c ► Plan and Implement Green Infrastructure to Reduce PCBs Loads

See the Countywide Program’s FY 2017-18 Annual Report for information on the quantitative relationship between green infrastructure

implementation and PCBs load reductions, including all data used and a full description of models and model inputs relied on to establish this

relationship.

C.12.e ► Evaluate PCBs Presence in Caulks/Sealants Used in Storm Drain or

Roadway Infrastructure in Public Rights-of-Way

A summary of Countywide Program and regional accomplishments for this sub-provision is included in the Countywide Program’s FY 2017-18

Annual Report.

58BASMAA 2017. Interim Accounting Methodology for TMDL Loads Reduced, Version 1.0. Prepared for BASMAA by Geosyntec Consultants and EOA,

Inc., September 19, 2016.

FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.12 – PCBs Controls


FY 17-18 AR Form 12-2 9/30/18

C.12.f ►Manage PCB-Containing Materials and Wastes During Building

Demolition Activities So That PCBs Do Not Enter Municipal Storm Drains

A summary of Countywide Program and regional accomplishments for this sub-provision is included in the C.12 PCBs Controls section of

Countywide Program’s FY 2017-18 Annual Report.

Does your agency plan to seek exemption from this requirement? Yes X No

C.12.g.►Fate and Transport Study of PCBs: Urban Runoff Impact

on San Francisco Bay Margins

A summary of Countywide Program and regional accomplishments for this sub-provision are included in the Countywide Program’s FY 2017-18

Annual Report.

C.12.h ►Implement a Risk Reduction Program

A summary of Countywide Program and regional accomplishments for this sub-provision are included in the Countywide Program’s FY 2017-18

Annual Report.

FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.13 – Copper Controls


FY 17-18 AR Form 13-1 9/30/18

Section 13 - Provision C.13 Copper Controls

C.13.a.iii.(3) ►Manage Waste Generated from Cleaning and

Treating of Copper Architectural Features

Provide summaries of permitting and enforcement activities to manage waste generated from cleaning and treating of copper architectural

features, including copper roofs, during construction and post-construction.

Summary:

Plan check staff are trained to identify these features. Building permit staff also warns contractors against flushing copper piping systems and

advises that the water must be captured and disposed of properly.

C.13.b.iii.(3) ►Manage Discharges from Pools, Spas, and

Fountains that Contain Copper-Based Chemicals

Provide summaries of any enforcement activities related to copper-containing discharges from pools, spas, and fountains.

Summary:

There are no enforcement actions regarding copper-containing discharges from pools, spas and fountains.

C.13.c.iii ►Industrial Sources Copper Reduction Results

Based upon inspection activities conducted under Provision C.4, highlight copper reduction results achieved among the facilities identified as

potential users or sources of copper, facilities inspected, and BMPs addressed.

Summary:

The City does not have any facilities that have been identified as potential users or sources of copper.

FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.15 – Exempted and Conditionally Exempted Discharges


FY 17-18 AR Form 15-1 9/30/18

Section 15 -Provision C.15 Exempted and Conditionally Exempted Discharges

C.15.b.vi.(2) ► Irrigation Water, Landscape Irrigation, and Lawn

or Garden Watering

Provide implementation summaries of the required BMPs to promote measures that minimize runoff and pollutant loading from excess irrigation.

Generally the categories are:

Promote conservation programs

Promote outreach for less toxic pest control and landscape management

Promote use of drought tolerant and native vegetation

Promote outreach messages to encourage appropriate watering/irrigation practices

Implement Illicit Discharge Enforcement Response Plan for ongoing, large volume landscape irrigation runoff.

Summary:

The City through the CCCWP promote and implement several programs and measures to minimize pollutant loading from excess irrigation

including, but not limited to:

Stormwater C.3 Guidebook adopted by ordinance, which promotes to land development professionals landscaping designed to: 1)

minimize irrigation and runoff; 2) promote infiltration of runoff where appropriate; and, 3) minimize use of fertilizers and pesticides using

pest-resistant plants that are suited to site conditions (e.g., soil and climate).

Green Business Program, which promotes to businesses a variety of measures such as using drought tolerant plantings, mulching,

carefully monitoring irrigation schedules and needs, and implementing Integrated Pest Management.

Our Water Our World (OWOW) Program, which promotes to consumers at the point of purchase less toxic alternatives to combating lawn

and garden pests.

Bay Friendly Landscaping and Gardening Training and Certification Program, which promotes to landscapers a variety of measures

designed to reduce waste and prevent stormwater pollution.

Attachment 1 C.4.b.iii. Potential Facilities List

Name Address City ProgramCategoryKim'sSalon&Spa 844WillowAveA9-A10 Hercules BeautySalonQBeautySalon 844WillowAveA7 Hercules BeautySalonWestCoastDrilling 1350WillowAve Hercules CommercialCaliBayDentalCare 1581SycamoreAve3 Hercules DentalDentalCenter 844WillowAveA6 Hercules DentalCreeksideDryCleaners 1511SycamoreAve#G Hercules DryCleanerHerculesCleaners 1581SycamoreAve Hercules DryCleanerParkLakeCleaners 1572SycamoreAve#C Hercules DryCleanerWillowCleaners 844WillowAve#A5 Hercules DryCleanerAnh'sKitchen 844WillowAveA3 Hercules FoodServiceBurgerKing 844WillowAve Hercules FoodServiceCabalenFilipinoCusine 1572SycamoreAveF Hercules FoodServiceCafeTapioca 1581SycamoreAveA9 Hercules FoodServiceClawsAndCraws 848WillowAve Hercules FoodServiceCurryMeUp 1511SycamoreAve Hercules FoodServiceDragonTerrace 1581SycamoreAve#1 Hercules FoodServiceExtremePizza 3700SanPabloAve Hercules FoodServiceGenkiHouseSushi 1581SycamoreAve Hercules FoodServiceHerculesRoundTable 1511SycamoreAve#D Hercules FoodServiceJackInTheBox 3800SanPabloAve#A Hercules FoodServiceKindersMeats,Deli,BBQ 3600SanPabloAve#1 Hercules FoodServiceL&lHawaiianBarbeque 1572SycamoreAve#B Hercules FoodServiceLeilabytheBay 1991RailroadAve Hercules FoodServiceMazatlanTaqueria&Grill 844WillowAve#A11 Hercules FoodServiceMcDonald's 1570SycamoreAve Hercules FoodServiceMountainMike's 848WillowAveD Hercules FoodServicePowderKeg 2132RailroadAve Hercules FoodServiceRSMOrientalFoodmart/Restaurant 1500SycamoreAveB-6 Hercules FoodServiceShinsenSushi 1581SycamoreAve Hercules FoodServiceStarbucksCoffee 3700SanPabloAve Hercules FoodService

StarbucksCoffee 842WillowAve Hercules FoodServiceSubway 1572SycamoreAve#A Hercules FoodServiceSunflowerBakery 1500SycamoreAve#B-3 Hercules FoodServiceTacoBell 1541SycamoreAve Hercules FoodServiceTuttiFrutti 3900SanPabloAve4 Hercules FoodServiceWillowGardenChinese 844WillowAve#A-8 Hercules FoodServiceWonThaiCuisine 833WillowAve#A-1A Hercules FoodServiceZaiqaIndianandPakistaniCuisine 848WillowAve#E,F,G Hercules FoodServiceHerculesShellGasStation 3900SanPabloAve Hercules GasStationUnion76/proWash&Go 828WillowAve Hercules GasStationLuckySupermarket 1590SycamoreAve Hercules GroceryStoreWillowFood&Liquor 844WillowAve#A1 Hercules GroceryStoreBio-RadLaboratories 2000AlfredNobelDrive Hercules LaboratoryBio-RadLaboratories 225-265LinusPaulingDrive Hercules LaboratoryBio-RadLaboratories 4000AlfredNobelDrive Hercules LaboratoryBio-RadLaboratories 6000JamesWatsonDrive Hercules LaboratoryBio-RadLaboratories 800AlfredNobelDrive Hercules LaboratoryBio-RadLaboratories 925AlfredNobelDrive Hercules LaboratoryDaviLab 730AlfredNobelDrive Hercules LaboratoryEAGLaboratory(formerlyPTRLWestLab) 625AlfredNobelDriveB Hercules LaboratoryPacificBioLabs 551LinusPaulingDrive Hercules LaboratoryWestCoastPathologyLaboratory 708-712AlfredNobelDrive104 Hercules LaboratoryWestcoastPathologyLaboratory 710AlfredNobelDrive Hercules LaboratoryA&BDieCasting 900AlfredNobelDrive Hercules ManufacturingCreeksideCenter 1501SycamoreAve Hercules PropertyMngtLinGroupProperties,LLC 1572SycamoreAve Hercules PropertyMngtBigLots 1551SycamoreAve Hercules RetailHomeDepot 1625SycamoreAve Hercules RetailRiteAid 1560SycamoreAve#B-5 Hercules Retail

Attachment 2 C.10. Full Trash Capture and Trash Management Area Map

9

9 9

6

352

41

2

8

6

2

6

6

75

UP

I 80 FW

Y

BNSFGI

ANT R

D

A ST

CUMMINGS SKWAY

ALHAMBRA VALLEY RD

MAY RD

PINOLE VALLEY RD

3RD

ST

SAN PABLO DAM RD

REFUGIO VALLEY RD

HILLTOP DR

34TH

ST

AMADOR ST

NIMITZ WY

PARR BLVD

SAN PA

BLO AV

E

FRANKLIN CANYON RD

VALLEY VIEW RD

CASTRO RANCH RD

MARKET AVE

EL PORTAL DR

ATLAS RD

TARA HILLS DR

YUBA ST

7TH ST

WRIGHT AVE

BROOKSIDE DR

SYCAMORE AVE

LUPINE RD

BARRETT AVE

AMEND RD

CAST

RO ST KERN ST

POMONA ST

9TH

ST

CHRISTIE RD

GARVIN AVE

REDWOOD RD

8TH

ST

SHANE DR

BLUME DR SIMAS AVE

21ST

ST

DOIDGE AVE

TURQUOISE DR

30TH

ST

DOVER AVE

MOYERS RD

32ND

ST33

RD ST

PHEASANT DR

SHAWN DR

LOWELL AVE

CROCKETT BLVD

GROOM DR

OLINDA RD

CORA

L DR

VALE RD

HILL

CRES

T RD

ANDRADE AVE

FALCON WAY

20TH

ST

ROOSEVELT AVE

HAMP

TON

RD

MARLESTA RD

RICHMOND PKWY

EMERIC AVE

VAQU

EROS

AVE

BAYBERRY AVE

SARAH DR

ESTATES AVE

DUPERU DR

PINE AVE

STANTON AVE

NAPA

AVE

38TH

ST

DUNN AVE

MINER AVE

RAMP

TENNENT AVE

MARICOPA AVE

1ST S

T

SHAMROCK DR

6TH

ST

JO ANN DR

SHELDON DR

RHEEM AVE

CYPRESS AVE

MORNINGSIDE DR

19TH

ST

CHESLEY AVE

VISTA DEL RIO

KELVIN RD

FITZG

ERAL

D DR

IRIS RD

SANTA RITA RD

RAMONA ST

HUMPHREY AVE

PARK

RID

GE D

R

ROAD 20

SHEA DR

DUARTE TRL

ALAMO AVE

VENTURA ST

HILLSIDE DRCOSTA AVE

HENRY AVE

WILDCAT CANYON PKWY

BEAR

CRE

EK RD

BERNHARD AVE

RUMRILL BLVD

ELM DR

PERE

IRA S

T

36TH

ST

RINC

ON R

D

WANDA ST

31ST

STRIPLEY AVE

MC LAUGHLIN ST

23RD

ST

VIEWPOINTE BLVD

LASSEN ST

39TH

ST

VIOLET RD

MANOR RD

KEVIN RD

GAYNOR AVE

HENSLEY ST

STIRLING DR

SUTTER AVE

GRANT AVE

LINCOLN AVE

4TH

ST

ESMOND AVE

APPIA

N WAY

KEITH DR

CORONADO ST

GARRETSON AVE

RIVERS ST

HERCULES AVE

WILLOW AVE

CLARK-BOAS TRL

PARTRIDGE DR

DUBOCE AVE

FRAN

WAY

DOWRELIO DR

SILVER AVE

SIERRA AVE

NOB HILL AVE

MEZUE TRL

SANTA FE

28TH

ST

CALIFORNIA ST

17TH

ST

ROLLINGWOOD DR

HELLINGS AVE

RAILROAD

AVE

SOLANO AVE

SANFORD AVE

EDWARDS ST

GARRARD BLVD

HAWTH

ORNE DR

CARSON ST

ALLVIEW AVE

COALINGA AVE

LIMERICK RD

DOWNER AVE

FLANNERY RD

COLUSA ST

5TH

ST

37TH

ST

KENNEY DR

ALFRED NOBEL DR

LAKE AVE

HAZEL AVE

BROADWAY AVE

SAVAGE AVE

EMMA DR

MADELINE RD

MAAS AVE

RIDGE RD

RANCHO RD

DOLA

N WAY

ALAMO ST

PINON

AVE

LAKE ST

ALICE WAY

22ND

ST

OURSAN TRL

14TH

ST

COLL

INS A

VE

VALL

EJO

AVE

ALHAMBRA ST

GERTRUDE AVE

JOHN AVE

PITTSBURG AVE

GALBRETH RD

YORK

ST

CANYON DR

LAKE

SIDE D

R

CALIFORNIA AVE

11TH

ST

SUNN

YVIEW

DR

18TH

ST

MONTALVIN DR

WISW

ALL D

R

STATE FREEWAY 4 FWY

PEBBLE DR

WILLARD AVE

BUSH AVE

WILLOW RD

12TH

ST

LA C

OLIN

A RD

PARK AVE

CHUR

CH LN

COACH DR

UTAH DR

ALPINE RD

NEWBURY

SOBRANTE AVE

CLINTON AVE

PALM AVE

DEL MONTE DR

PARK CENTRAL

10TH

ST

RIM RD

40TH

ST

ADOBE RD

CARRIAGE DR

MAHAN WAY

DIMM WY

BRIAN RD

LA CRESENTA RD

MARIPOSA ST

GROVE AVE

HILLVIEW DR

VICTOR ST

UNION OIL COMPANY

DA VILLA

LA PALOMA RD

LA CIMA RD

DENISE DR

BROOK WAY

CLAR

K RD

HEAVENLY RIDGE LN

16TH

ST

GARD

EN TR

ACT R

D

KILLARNEY RD

PAVON

SAN PABLO RIDGE TRL

KILDA

RE W

AY

BONITA RD

LETTIA RD

JENK

INS

WAY

PACIFIC REFINERY

GILMA DR

RALSTON AVE

LORING AVE

BURBECK AVE

RUFF AVE

LUCAS AVE

HUMBOLDT ST

24TH

ST

CORNELIUS DR

MAHONEY ST

CANYON RD

25TH

ST

ROLPH PARK DR

35TH

ST

26TH

ST

BIRMINGHAM DRSTARLING WAY

FARISS LN

MORA

GA D

R

SANDPOINT DR

TULARE AV

E

LINDA DR

29TH

ST

KAY RD

LINUS PAULING DR

PLYMOUTH AVE

SONOMA ST

PACIFIC AVE

VIA VERDE

CHRISTINE DR

GRISSOM STMANN DR

EMERALD WAY

SUISU

N AVE

CINNA

BAR W

AY

ARLINGTON BLVD

BARN

ARD S

T

NOB HILL

MORAN AVE

2ND

ST

DESERET DR

VAN N

ESS S

TTYLE

R ST

WELLE RD

CANT

ERBU

RY

VIEW DR

DRAPER ST

PALMER AVE

PARKER RD

RACHEL RD

WINSLOW ST

DARTFORD

HIGHLANDS RD

ORLEANS DRMARIN AVE

ARUNDEL WAY

LILLIAN ST

TAMALPAIS DR

ESPANOLA DR

EL C

ENTR

O RD

NIMITZ WAY

MISS

ION

BELL

DR

BARKLEY DRLANCASTER DR

VERDE AVE

GRIFFIN DR

PONDEROSA TRAIL

ROLP

H AV

E

VERNON AVE

MANOR DR

MEAD

OW AV

E

JOHN MUIR

VISALIA AVE

CAROL ST

CATALINA DR

KEAR

NEY S

T

SEASCAPE CIR

HILLTOP MALL RD

MIDS

HIP D

R

KILKENNY WAY

WILCOX AVE

CERES ST

LAUREL LN

DOWNER ST BOBOLINK WAY

ROBIN

HOOD

DR

MAROVICH LN

OLD COUNTY RD

FOREST RUN

KIPLING DR

TITAN WAY

CHEVY WAY

WILSON AVE

ARGYLE RD

TRI L

N

LAMBERT RD

GARDEN RD

PARKSIDE DR

MASO

N ST

ST ANDREWS DR

PAYNE DR

MC BRYDE AVE

FIELD

CRES

T DR

FAWCETT

CERRO SUR

BALM

ORE C

T

DEL C

AMINO

DR

13TH

ST

B ST

MCKENZIE DR

LILAC

CIR

FAIR

WAY D

R

BODEGA WAY

MENDOCINO DR

RAIN CLOUD DR

GOOD

RICK

AVE

RENFREW RD

DUKE AVE

RADI

ANT A

VE

MARIN RD

OBSID

IAN W

AY

MARCAS ST

ROCKY RD

FORD

HAM

ST

ROSE ST

SELMI GROVE

SALIDA WAY

LYNN DR

WIND

WARD

DR

15TH

ST

BEEC

HNUT DR

ROCK

ROSE

WAY

ROSTI

CARQUINEZ BRIDGE BRG

MCGLOTHEN WAY

6TH

AVE

FARIA

ST

ROSEDALE DR

AGATE WAY

PENNSYLVANIA AVE

DEER RUN

KELL

EY AV

E

GOMEZ RD

PINOL

E SHO

RES

DR

LOYOLA AVE

WENDELL AVE

WEST

ST

LA HONDA RD

HARMON RD

AVON

LN

QUINAN STN RANCHO RD

OIL WELL TRL

BALDWIN AVE

BUCKBOARD WAY

SKELLY AVE

WESLEY WAY

VALLEY RUN

PLUM ST

PATRA DR

RODEO AVE

HILLTOP MALL

SARGENT AVE

ORTHO WY

OVERLOOK WAY

MONTEGO DR

DE ANZA DR

GARRITY WAY

GREENWAY DR

CALAIS DR

MANZANITA PL

BANKS DRGRENADINE WAY

NOTTINGHAM DR

HOKE DR

VILLAGE PKWY

OHATCH DRCASTRO RD

BATT

ERY S

T

JOHN ST

SOLITUDE LN

PULL

MAN

ST

NELSON DR

SPRUCE CT

LOIS

LN

AUTO PLAZA

MORWOOD DR

BANTRY RD

HIGHGATE DR

BLAC

K FEA

THER

DR

N JA

DE S

T

MURPHY DR

GREENWICH RD

ERLA

WAY

BELGUM TRL

PARKRIDGE DR

KIRK LN

BRISTOL

STOKES AVE

FAIRMEDE DR

MAC A

RTHU

R AVE

TANAGER WAY

MANC

HEST

ER AV

E

TESO

RO CT

JAMES WATSON DR

INGROFF RD

ARDMORE DR

ONEIL CIR

KITTERY WAY

VIRGINIA ST

SMITH

AVE

SIMON

I CT

YUBA AVE

ELMA

R CT

PACIFIC DR

ALVA

REZ A

VE

POPP

Y DR

SETTING SUN DR

CENT

RAL S

T

PATR

ICK D

R

HEATH DR

DUNHAM

TRIGGER LN

BREN

TZ LN

CORAL RIDGE CIR

DIANE

DR

HILL

VIEW

LN

W GERTRUDE AVE

MARIGOLD DR

MONTE VERDE DR

DIMM WAY

GREE

NRID

GE DR

SWEETWOOD DR

MIFLIN AVE

HENDERSON DR

CLAREMONT AVE

FRANCIS ST

PABLO VISTA AVE

ROSE ARBOR AVE

ROBLE AVE

CANTERBURY DR

MOZART DR

KYER ST

FILLM

ORE

ST

DURSEY DR

EL M

ONTE

RD

FINCH CT

BERYL CT

GOLDENROD DR

APOLLO

LENORA RD

CIRCLE DR

SADDLEBACK CT

ATHENA

VILLA DR

RALEIGH CT

VENTURA AVE

REMUDA WAY

PRUNE ST

ALHA

MBRA

RD

OLIVE AVE

HAYE

S ST

GLENN AVE

BANC

ROFT

LN

FACTORY S

T

PYRA

MID

DR

JONE

S AVE

QUAIL HILL LN

NIEM

EYER

RD

BRIDGEWAY CIR

ELDERBERRY CT

ALFREDA BLVD

BUCKSKIN RD

ALEXANDER ST

SUNHILL CIR

WYMAN ST

GERALD AVE

EVENS AVE

PINOL

E AVE

TRIA

NGLE

CIR

SOTO

ST

11 TH

ST

CLUB CT

NIEM

EYER

AVE

BROOKS AVE

IDLEWOOD DR

ABERDEEN WAY

ORCHID CT

DIAS

CT

LA M

IRAD

A DR

BLUEBIRD CT

IOLA AVE

E MEA

DOW

AVE

RESEARCH DR

CRUCERO AVE

POST AVE

STARR ST

PAINT

ED PO

NY R

D

RACH

ILL LN

TRIGGER RD

PHILLIP CT

WOODGATE CT

EL TORO WAY

MARTIS CT

EAGL

E CT

JOAN VISTA

CHESTNUT DR

RATON CT

BOLDUC CT

APPIAN CT

LA REINA ST

BELMONT WAY

ADAM

S CT

OTOOLE WAY

SKYLINE DR

GLENWOOD

TIDEWATER DR

MADERA ST

PINOLE RD

TRAVALINI CT

HUMBOLDT AVE

MARCUS AVE

HUNTERS L

N

DOHR

MAN

LN

JORDAN WAY

SEVILLE CT

SHEFFIELD

PITT W

AY

CLAR

E ST

CRESTVIEW DR

OAK K

NOLL

RD

MART

INS LN

N ST

ONEG

LEN

BARN

ES W

AY

EBSEN CT

LOPE

S CT

CRYS

TAL C

IR

TERRI AN

N LN

BAILEY LN

SWEE

NEY C

T

ORION

STONINGTON AVE

JO-LIN CT

FIESTA

CT

BELDEN ST

TAPE

R ST

HOPKINS CT

PEACH ST

CLAEYS CT

EL PATIO

DE CARLO AVE

ROBIN CT

ZINN ST

LAUREL AVE

LONGHORN CT

ROSALIND AVE

VINCENT DR

KNOBCONE DR

RAMSEY CT

HANSOM LN

ELM STHEML

EB CT

NATALIE CT

ESTHER LN

TULLIBEE RD

ECKLEY RD

LEISU

RE LN

TERRY CT

LOCUST C

T

POPL

AR CT

FIR C

T

20TH

ST

RAMP

A ST

5TH

ST

2ND

ST

RAMP

RAMP

UP

RAMP

SAN PABLO AVE

SAN PABLO AVE

HILLTO

P DR

TULARE AVE

SAN PABLO DAM RD

7TH

ST

RAMP

22ND

ST

COLLINS AVE

19TH

ST

RAMP

LUCAS AVE

JOHN ST

RODEO AVE

RAMP

RAMP

RAMP

SAN PABLO AVE

24TH

ST

RAMP

RAMP

SAN PABLO AVE

RHEEM AVE

17TH

ST

RAMP

6TH ST

3RD

ST2N

D ST

CLINTON AVE

7TH

ST

GARVIN AVE

RAMP

SAN

PABL

O AV

E

4TH

ST

RAMP

RAMP

13TH ST

RAMP

1ST ST

RAMP

20TH

ST

20TH

ST

3RD ST

RAMP

RAMP

RAMP

35TH

ST

SAN P

ABLO

AVE

RAMP

17TH

ST

13TH ST

14TH

ST

RAMP

SANFORD AVE

5TH ST

12TH

ST

BNSF

5TH

STGO

ODRI

CK AV

E

21ST

ST

BNSF

YUBA AVE BELGUM TRL

22ND

ST

ESMOND AVE

22ND

ST

26TH

ST

RAMP

PACIFIC REFINERY

RAILR

OAD

AVE

21ST

ST

RAMP

RAMP

2ND ST

RAMP

RAMP

I 80 FW

Y

WILSON AVE

BNSF

19TH

ST

24TH

ST

GERTRUDE AVE

2ND

ST

18TH

ST

CHURCH LN

I 80 FW

Y

RAMP

LINCOLN AVEMC BRYDE AVE

11TH

ST

37TH

ST

15TH

ST

RAMP

I 80 FWY

RAMP

6TH

ST 16TH

ST

HENRY AVE

I 80 FW

Y

32ND

ST

RAMP

WILLOW AVE

PALM AVE

RAMP

RAMP

RAMP

15TH

ST

RAMP

21ST

ST

GARVIN AVE

19TH

ST

I 80 FWY

1ST ST

SAN PABLO AVE

RAMP

LORING AVE

21ST

ST

Pinole Creek

Rodeo Creek

Wildcat Creek

Refugio Creek

Rheem Creek

San Pablo Creek

Goat

Creek

Garrity Creek

Lago

ons C

reek

Trib of Rodeo

Canada del Cierbo

Ohlon

e Cree

k

Castro C

reek

Wilkie Creek

Edwards Creek

Appian C

reek

Lila Creek

Simas

Creek

Clark Creek

Oursan Creek

April

Cree

k

Kennedy Creek

Oak Creek

La Co

lina C

reek

Duncan Creek

Trib of Pinole

Wire Ranch Creek

Barx

Creek

Newell Creek

Trib o

f Wild

cat

North C

reek

Trib of Edwards

Oak M

oth Cr

eek

Mohring Creek

Trib of Lagoons

Pavo

n Cree

k

Coal Mine Creek

Big Oak

Creek

Trib o

f San P

ablo

Trib of Pereira

Trib of Refugio

Cottonwood Creek

Butterfly Creek

Trib of Canada del Cierbo

Trib of Goat

Elkhorn Creek

Sludge Creek

Trib of Bull Valley

Trib o

f Sim

as

Trib of Wire Ranch

Trib of Castro

Trib of Garrity

Trib of Rodeo

Trib of San Pablo

Trib o

f Rod

eo

Trib of Goat

Trib of Castro

Trib of Wildcat

Pavon Creek

Trib of Edwards

Trib o

f San

Pablo

Trib of Rodeo

Trib of Rodeo

Trib o

f Pino

le

Trib of Rodeo

Trib of R

efugio

Trib o

f Rode

o

Trib o

f Rod

eo

Trib of Canada del Cierb

o

Trib of Rodeo

Trib of Lagoons

Trib o

f Edw

ards

Trib of PinolePavo

n Cree

k

Trib o

f Refu

gio

Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMapcontributors, and the GIS User Community

Trash Generation CategoryLowMediumHighVery High

Creek/Shoreline HotspotTrash Management AreaFull-Capture LocationFull Trash CaptureNon-Jurisdicational(Dot color = Generation Category)

StreetsAgency BoundaryCreeksParcel Boundary

HERCULES Full Trash Capture and Trash Management Area Map

0 0.75 1.50.375 Miles8/21/2018

Information contained on these maps is for the solepurpose of the Contra Costa Clean Water Program.Accuracy of the data is not guaranteed.Map Created By CCCWP GIS

2

Attachment 3 C.10.a.ii.b. Private Lands Drainage Area Map

Agency BoundaryPreliminary PLDAsExcluded PLDAPotential PLDA Under Evaluation

Provision C.10.a.ii.b. Private Lands Drainage Area MapCITY OF HERCULES

0 1 20.5 MilesDate: 8/30/2018

320

3212

5

Trash Control Status SummaryPotential PLDA Screening AreaPotential PLDA Under EvaluationPotential PLDA Excluded to DatePreliminary PLDA Within Screening AreaPreliminary PLDA Outside Screening Area

Prepared byAcres

SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT

Track and Report on Trash Control Actions. The Permittee shall submit with the 2017 -

2018 Annual Report by September 30, 2018, and subsequently by March 30, 2019, a

brief narrative Supplemental Report that describes the Permittee’s progress toward

meeting the 70 percent and 80 percent trash load reduction requirements. The

Supplemental Reports shall include the following:

1. Regarding the Ordinance requiring installation of full trash capture devices by

commercial property owners within the Permittee’s jurisdiction:

a. The status of the Ordinance’s adoption

City response - The City of Hercules has passed the Ordinance and the

Ordinance is in effect.

b. Assuming adoption of the Ordinance:

i. A brief summary of the Ordinance

City response - Please reference the attached Ordinance for a summary.

ii. The timeline of implementation required by the Ordinance

City response - The City has achieved 74% reduction through implementation of

the Ordinance. The timeline for compliance has been met and the City is moving

forward to meet the 80% requirement in time with the June 30, 2019 date.

2. For all commercial property owners subject to the Ordinance :

a. The status of trash reduction implementation

City response - The City is engaged with multiple property owners who are

actively working to comply with the Ordinance. The City has already mapped one

major Private Drainage Area that has 26 newly installed Full Trash Capture units.

Additionally, another significant installation is online and will be completed by

the March 30, 2019 update.

b. The status of any enforcement actions undertaken, including actions by

the Permittee against commercial property owners, to achieve

compliance with the Ordinance

City response – No enforcement actions as of the date of this report. The City is

working collaboratively with property owners and is finding this approach to be

successful.

3. The status of any additional implementation actions, including source control

actions and offsets, used to achieve compliance with the Permit, and the

resulting trash load reduction.

City response - At this time, the City of Hercules is pursuing full trash capture in

order to meet the reduction goals. The City will keep this option open going

forward.

4. Progress toward meeting the trash reduction requirement by the deadline

identified in Provision 1, above, including the resulting city - wide total trash load

reduction (percent).

City response - Please reference the table included below.

Appendix XX ► Baseline trash generation and areas addressed by full capture systems and other control measures in Fiscal Year 18-19.

TMA

2009 Baseline Trash Generation

(Acres)

Trash Generation (Acres) in FY 18-19 After

Accounting for Full Capture Systems Jurisdiction - wide Reduction via Full

Capture Systems (%)

Trash Generation Area (Acres) in FY 18-19

After Accounting for Full Capture Systems & Other

Measures Jurisdiction - wide Reduction via Other

Control Measures (%)

Jurisdiction-wide Reduction via Full Capture AND

Other Control Measures (%)

L M H VH Total L M H VH Total L M H VH Total

1 0 0 11 0 11 10 0 2 0 11 42.7 10 0 2 0 11 0.0 42.7

2 0 30 0 0 30 19 11 0 0 30 21.0 19 11 0 0 30 0.0 21.0

3 20 0 0 0 20 20 0 0 0 20 NA 20 0 0 0 20 NA NA

4 2 10 0 0 12 12 0 0 0 12 10.7 12 0 0 0 12 0.0 10.7

5 8 0 0 0 8 8 0 0 0 8 NA 8 0 0 0 8 NA NA

6 0 6 0 0 6 0 6 0 0 6 0.0 0 6 0 0 6 0.0 0.0

7 5 0 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 5 NA 5 0 0 0 5 NA NA

8 10 0 0 0 10 10 0 0 0 10 NA 10 0 0 0 10 NA NA

9 3751 0 0 0 3751 3751 0 0 0 3751 NA 3751 0 0 0 3751 NA NA

Totals 3797 46 11 0 3855 3836 17 2 0 3855 74.5 3836 17 2 0 3855 0.0 74.5

Chapter 8. Stormwater Management and Discharge Control

Sec. 5-8.010 Intent and Purpose.(a) The intent of this Chapter is to protect and enhance the water quality in the City of Hercules’ s watercourses pursuant to and consistent with the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act (Water Code Section 13000 et seq.) and the Federal Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. Section 1251 et seq.).

(b) This Chapter also carries out the conditions in the City’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit that require effective February 15, 2005 implementation of appropriate source control and site design measures and stormwater treatment measures for projects that create or replace one (1) acre or more of impervious surface, and that effective August 15, 2006 reduce the threshold to projects that create or replace ten thousand (10,000) square feet or more of impervious surface.

(c) It is the purpose of the City Council in enacting this Chapter to protect the health, safety and general welfare of Hercules’ citizens by:

(1) Minimizing non- stormwater discharges, whose pollutants would otherwise degrade the water quality of local streams, to the stormwater system.

(2) Minimizing increases in non-point source pollution caused by stormwater runoff from development that would otherwise degrade local water quality.

(3) Controlling the discharge to the City’s stormwater system from spills, dumping or disposal of materials other than stormwater.

(4) Reducing stormwater run-off rates and volumes and non-point source pollution whenever possible, through stormwater management controls and ensuring that these management controls are properly maintained and pose no threat to public safety. (Ord. 404 § 1 (part), 2005: Ord. 332 § 1 (part), 1996)

Sec. 5-8.020 Definitions.The following words and phrases when used in this Chapter shall be as defined herein. Words and phrases in this Chapter and not otherwise defined shall be interpreted as defined in the regulations issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to implement the provisions of the Federal Clean Water Act, and as defined by the State Water Resources Control Board to implement the Porter-Cologne Act:

(a) “Best management practices or BMP” are structural devices, measures, stormwatermanagement facilities or activities that help to meet development runoff requirements at the

Page 1 of 9Chapter 8 Stormwater Management and Discharge Control

11/14/2017http://www.codepublishing.com/CA/Hercules/

premises. BMP also include schedules of activities, prohibitions or practices, general good housekeeping, pollution prevention practices, maintenance procedures and other management practices, to prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutants directly or indirectly to watercourses, water bodies, and wetlands.

(b) “City’s NPDES permit” shall mean the NPDES permit issued to the City of Hercules, Permit No. CAS0029912, and any subsequent amendment, reissuance or successor to this NPDES permit.

(c) “Development runoff requirements” shall mean the provisions in the City’s NPDES permit that contain performance standards to address both the construction and post-construction phase impacts of new projects and redeveloped projects on stormwater quality. In the City’s 1999 NPDES permit these requirements are in Section C.3.

(d) “Director” shall mean the Director of Public Works of the City of Hercules or his or her designee.

(e) “Enforcement officer or Officer” shall mean those individuals designated by the director to act as authorized enforcement officers.

(f) “Guidebook” shall mean the most recent version of the Contra Costa Clean Water Program Stormwater C.3. Guidebook.

(g) “Non-stormwater discharge” means any addition of any pollutant to the City’s stormwatersystem, except discharges pursuant to a NPDES permit, or discharges further exempted in Section 5-8.060(c) and (d) of this Chapter.

(h) “Pollutant” shall mean any material other than stormwater including, but not limited to, petroleum products or by-products, solid waste, incinerator residue, sewage, sewage sludge, heat, chemical waste, biological materials, radioactive materials, wrecked or discarded equipment, rock, sand, soil and industrial, municipal or agricultural waste discharged into the water or stormwatersystem.

(i) “Premises” shall mean any building, structure, facility, or installation, (including a building’s grounds or other appurtenances), and adjacent sidewalks and parking strips.

(j) “Responsible person” shall mean the owner or occupant of any premises or who engages in any activity from which there is or may be a non-stormwater discharge or any person who releases pollutants to the City’s stormwater system.

(k) “Stormwater” shall mean flow on the surface of the ground resulting from precipitation.

(l) “Stormwater management facility” shall mean any device designated to detain, retain, filter, or infiltrate stormwater.

(m) “Stormwater control plan” shall mean a plan that meets those criteria contained in the most recent version of the Contra Costa Clean Water Program Stormwater C.3. Guidebook.

(n) “Stormwater system” means that system of facilities by which stormwater may be conveyed to any stream, watercourse, other body of water or wetlands, including flood control channels, any roads with drainage systems, City streets, catch basins, curbs, gutters, ditches, improved channels, storm drains or storm drain system, which are not part of a Publicly Owned Treatment Works (“POTW”) as that term is defined in 40 CFR Section 122.2. (Ord. 404 § 1 (part), 2005: Ord. 332 § 1 (part), 1996)

Sec. 5-8.030 Responsibility for Administration.The director or his designee shall administer this Chapter for the City. (Ord. 404 § 1 (part), 2005: Ord. 332 § 1 (part), 1996)



Sec. 5-8.040 Construction and Application.This Chapter shall be construed consistent with the requirements of the Federal Clean Water Act and amendments thereto or applicable implementing regulations and the City’s NPDES permit. (Ord. 404 § 1 (part), 2005: Ord. 332 § 1 (part), 1996)

Sec. 5-8.050 Stormwater Control Plan Required.(a) Every application for a development project, including but not limited to a rezoning, tentative map, parcel map, conditional use permit, variance, site development permit, design review, or building permit that is subject to the development runoff requirements in the City’s NPDES permit shall be accompanied by a stormwater control plan that meets the criteria in the most recent version of the Contra Costa Clean Water Program Stormwater C.3. Guidebook.

(1) Effective February 15, 2005 this requirement shall apply to:

A. All developments that create one (1) acre (forty-three thousand five hundred sixty (43,560) square feet) or more of impervious surface. Excluded from this category is the construction of one (1) single-family home, which is not part of a larger plan of development, with appropriate pollutant source control and site design measures, and using landscaping to appropriately treat runoff from roof and house-associated impervious surfaces.

B. Streets and road projects that create one (1) acre (forty-three thousand five hundred sixty (43,560) square feet) or more of new impervious surface. Excluded from this category are sidewalks, bicycle lanes, trails, bridge accessories, guardrails, and landscape features.

C. Projects on previously developed sites that result in the addition or replacement of a combined total of one (1) acre (forty-three thousand five hundred sixty (43,560) square feet) or more of impervious surface. Excluded from this category are interior remodels and routine maintenance or repair. Excluded routine maintenance and repair includes roof or exterior surface replacement, pavement resurfacing, repaving and road pavement structural section rehabilitation within the existing footprint, and any other reconstruction work within a public street or road right-of-way where both sides of that right-of-way are developed.

(2) Effective August 15, 2006 this requirement shall apply to:

A. All developments that create ten thousand (10,000) square feet or more of impervious surface. Excluded from this category is the construction of one (1) single-family home, which is not part of a larger plan of development, with appropriate pollutant source control and site design measures, and using landscaping to appropriate treat runoff from roof and house-associated impervious surfaces.

B. Streets and road projects that create ten thousand (10,000) square feet or more of new impervious surface. Excluded from this category are sidewalks, bicycle lanes, trails, bridge accessories, guardrails, and landscape features.

C. Projects on previously developed sites that result in the addition or replacement of a combined total of ten thousand (10,000) square feet or more of impervious surface. Excluded from this category are interior remodels and routine maintenance or repair. Excluded routine maintenance and repair includes roof or exterior surface replacement, pavement resurfacing, repaving and road pavement structural section rehabilitation within the existing footprint, and any other reconstruction work within a public street or road right-of-way where both sides of that right-of-way are developed.



(3) Subsections (a)(1) and (a)(2) shall be interpreted in a manner that is consistent with the development runoff requirements and exclusions in the City’s NPDES permit.

(b) Implementation of an approved storm-water control plan and submittal of an approved stormwater control operation and maintenance plan by the applicant shall be a condition precedent to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for a project subject to this Section.

(c) All stormwater management facilities shall be designed in a manner to minimize the need for maintenance and reduce the chances of failure. Design guidelines are outlined in the guidebook.

(d) All stormwater management facilities shall be maintained according to the guidebook and the approved stormwater control operation and maintenance plan. The person(s) or organization(s) responsible for maintenance shall be designated in the plan. Unless a different time period is provided for in the plan, those responsible for maintenance shall inspect the stormwatermanagement facility at least annually. The plan shall also describe how the maintenance costs will be funded. Upon the failure of a responsible person to maintain a stormwater management facility in accordance with this Chapter or the plan, the City may perform the maintenance and recover its costs from the responsible person as provided in Sections 5-8.170 and 5-8.180 of this Chapter.

(e) For access to stormwater management facilities for inspections and maintenance, recorded covenants or easements shall be provided by the property owner for access by the City, the Contra Costa Mosquito and Vector Control District, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. (Ord. 404 § 1 (part), 2005: Ord. 332 § 1 (part), 1996)

Sec. 5-8.060. Prohibited Discharges.(a) The release of non-stormwater discharges to the City stormwater system is prohibited.

(b) The discharge of stormwater from premises or an activity that causes or contributes to a violation of receiving water limitations in the City’s NPDES permit is prohibited.

(c) The following discharges are exempt from the prohibition set forth in subsection (a) of this Section:

(1) Any discharge in compliance with an NPDES permit issued to the discharger;

(2) Flows from riparian habitats and wetlands, diverted stream flows, springs, rising groundwater and uncontaminated groundwater infiltration.

(d) The following discharges are exempt from the prohibitions set forth in subsection (a) of this Section if the Regional Water Quality Control Board approves the exempted category under Section C.11. of the City’s NPDES permit: uncontaminated pumped groundwater, foundation drains, water from crawl space pumps, footing drains, air conditioning condensate, irrigation water, landscape irrigation, lawn or garden watering, planned and unplanned discharges from potable water sources, water line and hydrant flushing, individual residential car washing, discharges or flows from emergency fire fighting activities, and dechlorinated swimming pool discharges. (Ord. 404 § 1 (part), 2005: Ord. 332 § 1 (part), 1996)

Sec. 5-8.070. Discharge in Violation of NPDES Permit.Any discharge that would result in or contribute to a violation of the City’s NPDES permit either separately considered or when combined with other discharges, is prohibited. Liability for any such discharge shall be the responsibility of the person causing or responsible for the discharge, and such person shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City in any administrative or judicial enforcement action relating to such discharge. (Ord. 404 § 1 (part), 2005: Ord. 332 § 1 (part), 1996)

Sec. 5-8.080. Unlawful Discharge and Unlawful Connections.



(a) It is unlawful to establish, use, maintain or continue unauthorized drainage connections to the City’s stormwater system, and to commence or continue any unauthorized discharges to the City’s stormwater system.

(b) No discharge shall cause the following conditions, create a nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses of waters of the State:

(1) Floating, suspended or deposited macroscopic matter or foam;

(2) Bottom deposits or aquatic growth;

(3) Alterations of temperature, sediment load, nutrient load, or dissolved oxygen, which cause significant adverse impacts to native aquatic biota;

(4) Visible, floating, suspended or deposited oil or products of petroleum origin; or,

(5) Substances present in concentrations or quantities which cause deleterious effects on aquatic biota, wildlife or waterfowl, or which render any of these unfit for human consumption. (Ord. 404 § 1 (part), 2005: Ord. 332 § 1 (part), 1996)

Sec. 5-8.090 Best Management Practices and Standards.(a) Generally. Any person owning or operating premises that may contribute pollutants to the City’s stormwater system shall undertake all practicable best management practices to reduce the potential for pollutants entering the system. Examples of such premises include, but are not limited to, parking lots, gasoline stations, industrial facilities, and other commercial enterprises.

(b) Litter. No person shall throw, deposit, leave, keep or permit to be thrown, deposited, placed, left or maintained, any refuse, rubbish, garbage or other discarded or abandoned objects, articles or other litter in or upon any street, alley, sidewalk, business place, creek, stormwater system, fountain, pool, lake, stream, river or any other body of water, or upon any public or private parcel of land so that the same might become a pollutant, except in containers or in lawfully established waste disposal facilities.

(c) Sidewalks. The occupant or tenant, or in the absence of occupant or tenant, the owner or proprietor of any real property in front of which there is a paved sidewalk shall maintain said sidewalk free of dirt or litter to the maximum extent practicable. Sweepings from the sidewalk shall not be swept or otherwise made or allowed to go into the gutter or roadway, but shall be disposed of in receptacles maintained as required for the disposal of solid waste.

(d) Parking Lots, Paved Areas and Related Stormwater Systems. Persons owning, operating or maintaining a paved parking lot, the paved areas of a gasoline station, a paved private street or road, and related stormwater systems shall clean those premises as frequently and thoroughly as practicable in a manner that does not result in the discharge of pollutants to the City’s stormwatersystem.

(e) Construction Activities. All construction shall conform to the requirements of the CASQA Stormwater Best Management Practices Handbooks for Construction Activities and New Development and Redevelopment, the ABAG Manual of Standards for Erosion and Sediment Control Measures, the City’s grading and erosion control ordinance and other generally accepted engineering practices for erosion control as required by the director when undertaking construction activities. The director may establish controls on the rate of stormwater runoff from new developments and redevelopment as may be appropriate to minimize the discharge and transport of pollutants.

(f) Notification of Intent and Compliance with General Permits. Each discharger associated with construction activity or other discharger described in any general stormwater permit addressing



discharges, as may be adopted by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, the State Water Resources Control Board, or the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Francisco Bay Region, shall provide the director with the notice of intent, comply with and undertake all other activities required by any general stormwater permit applicable to such dischargers. Each discharger identified in an individual NPDES permit relating to stormwaterdischarges shall comply with and undertake all activities required by the permit.

(g) Development Runoff Requirements. For each new development and redevelopment project subject to the development runoff requirements, every applicant will submit a stormwater control plan and implement conditions of approval that reduce stormwater pollutant discharges through the construction, operation and maintenance of treatment measures and other appropriate source control and site design measures. Similarly, increases in runoff volume and flows shall be managed in accordance with the development runoff requirements.

(h) Compliance with Best Management Practices. Where best management practices guidelines or requirements have been adopted by any federal, state, regional, City or county agency, for any activity, or operation of premises which may cause or contribute to nonstormwater discharges, every person undertaking such activity, operation or owning and operating such premises shall comply with such guidelines or requirements.

(i) Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. The director may require any business or utility in the City that is engaged in activities that may result in non-stormwater discharges or runoff pollutants to develop and implement a stormwater pollution prevention plan, which must include an employee training program. Business activities which may require a stormwater pollution prevention plan include maintenance, storage, manufacturing, assembly, equipment operations, vehicle loading, fueling, vehicle maintenance, food handling or processing, or cleanup procedures which is carried out partially or wholly out of doors.

(j) Coordination with Hazardous Material Release Response and Inventory Plans. Any business subject to the Hazardous Material Release Response and Inventory Plan, Division 20, Chapter 6.95 of the California Health and Safety Code (commencing with Section 25500), shall include, in that plan, provision for compliance with this Chapter, including the prohibitions of non-stormwaterdischarges and the requirement to reduce release of pollutants to the maximum extent practicable. (Ord. 404 § 1 (part), 2005: Ord. 332 § 1 (part), 1996)

Sec. 5-8.100 Compliance Certificates for Stormwater Management Facilities.(a) Every person who owns, leases or operates any premises containing a stormwatermanagement facility or facilities is required to obtain annually a valid operation and maintenance Certificate of Compliance certifying to the inspection of and the proper operation and maintenance of the treatment measures and other appropriate source control and site design measures. Each responsible person subject to this requirement shall request an inspection from the City every twelve (12) months. Upon the filing of such request, and the payment of a fee covering the cost of inspection, the City shall inspect the property and shall either issue such certificate upon a determination by the inspector that all treatment measures and other appropriate source control and site design measures have been properly maintained and are in good condition, or shall issue a conditional certificate noting deficiencies that must be corrected within a time indicated on the certificate, or shall deny the certificate. A certificate shall be valid for one (1) year from the date of issuance. The City Council may by resolution establish the fee for the inspection and certificate.

(b) In lieu of a City inspection, such person may arrange for an inspection from a private company authorized to conduct inspections by the City. Such company shall use a City-approved inspection form that shall be executed under penalty of perjury. Should such inspection form establish that the treatment measures and other appropriate source control and site design measures have been properly maintained and are in good condition, the City may issue an operation and maintenance certificate of compliance or the City may at its cost re-inspect the property and proceed as



described in subsection (a) of this Section. The filing of a false inspection report shall be a misdemeanor. (Ord. 404 § 1 (part), 2005: Ord. 332 § 1 (part), 1996)

Sec. 5-8.110 Authority to Inspect.(a) Generally. Routine or scheduled inspections shall be based upon as reasonable a selection process as may be deemed necessary to carry out the intent of this Chapter, including, but not limited to, random sampling or sampling in areas with evidence of stormwater contamination, evidence of the discharge of non-stormwater to the stormwater system, or similar activities. Inspections may also be conducted in conjunction with routine or scheduled inspections conducted by other public agencies or special district, including but not limited to the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District, the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, County Environmental Health Department, the Contra Costa Mosquito and Vector Control District, or the Regional Water Quality Control Board.

(b) Authority to Sample and Establish Sampling Devices. With the consent of the owner or occupant, or pursuant to a search or inspection warrant, any officer may establish on any property such devices as are necessary to conduct sampling or metering operations. During all authorized inspections, the officer may take any sample deemed necessary to aid in the pursuit of the inquiry or in the recordation of the activities on site.

(c) Notification of Spills. All persons in charge of the premises or responsible for emergency response for the premises have a responsibility to train premises’ personnel and maintain notification procedures to ensure that immediate notification is provided to the City of any suspected, confirmed or unconfirmed release of pollutants creating a risk of nonstormwater discharge into the City stormwater system.

As soon as any person in charge of the premises or responsible for emergency response for the premises has knowledge of any suspected, confirmed or unconfirmed release of non-stormwaterdischarge entering the City stormwater system, such person shall take all necessary steps to ensure the detection and containment and clean up of such release and shall notify the City of the occurrence by telephoning the director. This notification requirement is in addition to and not in lieu of other required notifications.

(d) Requirement to Test or Monitor. Any officer may require that any person engaged in any activity or owning or operating any premises that may cause or contribute to nonstormwater discharges, undertake such monitoring activities or analysis and furnish such reports as the officer may specify. The burden, including costs of these activities, analysis and reports shall bear a reasonable relationship to the need for the monitoring, analysis and reports and the benefits to be obtained. The recipient of such request shall undertake and provide the monitoring, analysis and reports required. (Ord. 404 § 1 (part), 2005: Ord. 332 § 1 (part), 1996)

Sec. 5-8.120 Violations Constituting Misdemeanors.The violation of any provision of this Chapter, or failure to comply with any of the mandatory requirements of this Article shall constitute a misdemeanor, except that notwithstanding any other provisions of this Article, any violation constituting a misdemeanor under this Chapter may, at the discretion of the officer or City Attorney, be charged and prosecuted as an infraction. (Ord. 404 § 1 (part), 2005: Ord. 332 § 1 (part), 1996)

Sec. 5-8.130 Penalty for Violation.(a) Upon conviction of a misdemeanor, a person shall be subject to payment of a fine, or imprisonment, or both, not to exceed the limits set forth in California Government Code Section 36901.



(b) Upon conviction of an infraction, a person shall be subject to payment of a fine, not to exceed the limits set forth in California Government Code Section 36900. (Ord. 404 § 1 (part), 2005: Ord. 332 § 1 (part), 1996)

Sec. 5-8.140 Continuing Violation.Every day that any violation of this Chapter continues shall constitute a separate offense. (Ord. 404 § 1 (part), 2005: Ord. 332 § 1 (part), 1996)

Sec. 5-8.150 Concealment.Concealing, aiding or abetting a violation of any provision of this Chapter shall constitute a violation of such provision. (Ord. 404 § 1 (part), 2005: Ord. 332 § 1 (part), 1996)

Sec. 5-8.160 Acts Potentially Resulting in Violation of the Federal Clean Water Act or Porter-Cologne Act.Any person who violates any provision of this Chapter, or the provisions of any permit issued pursuant to this Chapter, or who releases a non-stormwater discharge, or who violates any cease and desist order, prohibition or effluent limitation, may also be in violation of the Federal Clean Water Act or the Porter-Cologne Act and may be subject to the enforcement provisions of those acts, including civil and criminal penalties. Any enforcement actions authorized pursuant to this Chapter may also include notice to the violator of such potential liability pursuant to federal or state law. (Ord. 404 § 1 (part), 2005: Ord. 332 § 1 (part), 1996)

Sec. 5-8.170 Violations Deemed a Nuisance.In addition to the penalties provided herein, any condition caused or permitted to exist in violation of any of the provisions of this Chapter is a threat to the public health, safety and welfare. Such condition is hereby declared and deemed to be a nuisance, which may be abated as provided in Chapter 10 of Title 4 (commencing with Section 0.01) of this Code including the assessment of the costs of abatement which may be collected at the same time and in the same manner as ordinary municipal taxes as provided by Government Code Section 38773.5, and by civil action to abate, enjoin or otherwise compel the cessation of such nuisance by the City Attorney. (Ord. 404 § 1 (part), 2005: Ord. 332 § 1 (part), 1996)

Sec. 5-8.180. Civil Actions.(a) In addition to any other remedies provided in this Chapter, any violation of this Chapter may be enforced by civil action brought by the City. In any such action, the City may seek, as appropriate, any and all of the following remedies:

(1) A temporary restraining order, preliminary injunction and permanent injunction;

(2) An action for an unlawful business practice pursuant to Business and Professions Code Section 17206;

(b) In addition any person violating this Chapter shall be liable for:

(1) Reimbursement for the costs of any investigation, inspection or monitoring which led to the discovery of the violation;

(2) Costs incurred in removing, correcting, or terminating the adverse effect(s) resulting from the violation;

(3) Compensatory damages for the loss of, or destruction to, water quality, wildlife, fish or aquatic life. Costs and damages under this subsection shall be paid to the City and shall be used exclusively for costs associated with monitoring and establishing a stormwaterdischarge pollution control system and implementing or enforcing the provisions of this Chapter;



(4) The cost of maintenance and repair of any BMP or stormwater management facility that is not maintained in accordance with the guidebook or the stormwater control plan;

(5) The reasonable costs of preparing and bringing administrative action under this Chapter. (Ord. 404 § 1 (part), 2005: Ord. 332 § 1 (part), 1996)

Sec. 5-8.190. Remedies Not Exclusive.The remedies identified in this Chapter are in addition to, and do not supersede or limit, any and all other remedies, administrative, civil or criminal. The remedies provided for herein shall be cumulative and not exclusive. (Ord. 404 § 1 (part), 2005: Ord. 332 § 1 (part), 1996)

Sec. 5-8.200. Notice of Violation.Any person required to perform monitoring, analysis, reporting or corrective activity by any officer may be informed of such decision, in writing, by a notice of violation. Any person aggrieved by the decision of the officer, may file a written appeal of the notice of violation to the director within ten (10) days following the date of the notice of violation. Upon receipt of such request, the director shall request a report and recommendation from the officer and shall set the matter for hearing at the earliest practical date. At said hearing, the director may hear additional evidence, and may reject, affirm or modify the officer’s decision. The decisions of the director shall be final. (Ord. 404 § 1 (part), 2005: Ord. 332 § 1 (part), 1996)

Sec. 5-8.210. Judicial Review.The provisions of Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.5 are applicable to judicial review of determinations made by the director pursuant to this Chapter. (Ord. 404 § 1 (part), 2005: Ord. 332 § 1 (part), 1996)

Mobile Version



FY 2017-2018 Annual Report · FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.2 – Municipal Operations Permittee...

Documents

Transcript of FY 2017-2018 Annual Report · FY 2017-2018 Annual Report C.2 – Municipal Operations Permittee...