FUTURE OF TV? 2006 Future of Television Forum NYU Stern School of Business John Rose November 14 th,...
-
Upload
randolf-willis -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of FUTURE OF TV? 2006 Future of Television Forum NYU Stern School of Business John Rose November 14 th,...
FUTURE OF TV?
2006 Future of Television ForumNYU Stern School of Business
John Rose
November 14th, 2006
Future of TV Lunch v.1 TN.ppt - 2 -
GUIDING BELIEFS
Distribution will continue to expand and fragment and video will be watched on an ever increasing number of devices
Consumer pay models will not replace advertising based models
Small changes in viewer and ad patterns will destroy / create disproportionate amounts of value
Interactive / digital services will not “fill the gap”
New competitors will emerge from historically unrelated business and win big
Appointment TV will gradually disappear
Future of TV Lunch v.1 TN.ppt - 3 -
KEY QUESTIONS WE SHOULD BE ASKING (I)
How will the consumer watch video in the future?Wrong
question
What different viewing patterns will different segments of the population exhibit?
Right question
Future of TV Lunch v.1 TN.ppt - 4 -
KEY QUESTIONS WE SHOULD BE ASKING (II)
Is there a future for TV?Wrong
question
Who will create and distribute video experiences?Right
question
Future of TV Lunch v.1 TN.ppt - 5 -
KEY QUESTIONS WE SHOULD BE ASKING (III)
How can I maintain / grow earnings?Wrong
question
How will money be made and how can I capture that value?Right
question
Future of TV Lunch v.1 TN.ppt - 6 -
CD sales decline... ...as music consumption soars
MUSIC INDUSTRY EXAMPLE: SALES AND CONSUMPTION
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
400,000
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
$ millions CD sales
millionsof songs
Songs consumed(1)
Real Forecasted
(1) Includes: Digital singles + digital albums + Recorded CDs + P2P files. Assuming 12 files per album, average number of P2P files shared per day= 30, growth in P2P similar to estimated growth in digital downloads
(2) Data prior to 2004 does not include digital downloads. Data prior to 2003 does not include P2P file sharing.Source: Veronis Suhler Stevenson, PQ Media, Recording Industry Association of America. The BigChampagne Group., Bay TSP report
Real(2) Forecasted
DistributionDistribution
CAGR 00-05-4.5%
CAGR 05-10
-10.3%
CAGR 00-05-4.5%
CAGR 00-05+47%
CAGR 05-0945%
Future of TV Lunch v.1 TN.ppt - 7 -
MUSIC INDUSTRY EXAMPLE: COLLAPSE OF EQUITY VALUE
EMI Share price evolution (GBP)
DistributionDistribution
Jan 00 Jan 02 Mar 03 Jan 04 Nov 06
CAGR-23%
CAGR-67%
CAGR+116%
CAGR+21%
Per share price (GBP) 6.1 3.6 0.9 1.6 2.8
Future of TV Lunch v.1 TN.ppt - 8 -- 8 -
TV INDUSTRY STRUCTURE: YESTERDAY
Broadcast
Satellite
DVD
Cable
VCR
Format ReplayAccess devices
Satellite set top box
DVD
Set top box
VCR
TV
DistributionDistribution
TV INDUSTRY STRUCTURE TODAY
Broadcast
Satellite
DVD
Cable
VCR
Mobile Streaming
Internet Streaming
DRM enabled downloads
Satellite set top box
DVD
Set top box
VCR
Sling box
TIVO
Blue Ray
Mobile phone
PC
Portable Digital Players
TV
Mobile Phone
Game consoles
Future of TV Lunch v.1 TN.ppt - 9 -
AD SPEND VS. CONSUMER PAY
(1) Includes revenue from Home Video, Consumer Books, Pure Play Internet Services, Recorded Music, Newspapers, Consumer Magazines, Box Office and Videogames. (2) Includes revenue from Broadcast TV, Cable & Satellite TV, Pure-Play Mobile content, Broadcast and Satellite Radio Source: Veronis Suhler Stevenson
181198
259
96112
123
41
74
108
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
2000 2005 2010
$B
Media spend
Consumer content(1)
Access revenue(2)
Consumer pay model vs ad model
Consumer pay model vs ad model
Future of TV Lunch v.1 TN.ppt - 10 -
Consumer pay model vs ad model
Consumer pay model vs ad model
CONSUMER DOWNLOAD MODEL VS. AD REVENUE FOR TV NETWORKS
87.5 7.5
8.9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Viewers Ad.Revenueper Hour
DownloadRevenue
RequiredDownloads
Million
Comparison of Revenue of Top 10 TV Show and Equivalent Download Revenue
iTunes Download model
Network TV Model
Equivalent revenue requires ~10-15% increase in audienceEquivalent revenue requires ~10-15% increase in audience
(1) Assumes $26 CPM for 18-49 Demo
(2) Net of 35% Distribution feeSource: TV Dimensions; BCG
(1) (2)
Advertising Download
Future of TV Lunch v.1 TN.ppt - 11 -
ALTERNATIVE MODELS FOR APPOINTMENT TV
Virtual aggregator controlled3
Appointment TVAppointment TV
Consumer controlled: PVR/DVR1
Which one do you want?Which one do you want?
Cable / MSO controlled: VOD2
Network / MSO controlled: VOD4
Future of TV Lunch v.1 TN.ppt - 12 -
RECENT ACTIONS
Company ActionDate
CBS begin selling downloads of Survivor on CBS.comFeb. 2006
TV networks sue Cablevision for Network DVRApr. 2006
iTunes begins selling movies with Disney as its sole partner
Sept. 2006
NBC dedicates 8 p.m. slot for reality, game shows; phasing out scripted shows in first hour of prime time
Oct. 2006
Top ABC shows available for download; Disney nears half-million sales through iTunes Nov. 2006
Appointment TVAppointment TV
Future of TV Lunch v.1 TN.ppt - 13 -
Changes in audience
Changes in audience
EFFECTS OF CHANGES IN AUDIENCE Example: Newspaper Company
Equity value declined 27% during this periodEquity value declined 27% during this period
Index(2000 = 100)
80
90
100
110
120
130
2000 2005
Readership
(11%)
80
90
100
110
120
130
2000 2005
Profit Margin
(16%)
80
90
100
110
120
130
2000 2005
Revenue
19%
Future of TV Lunch v.1 TN.ppt - 14 -
MUSIC EXAMPLE
New competitorsNew competitors
Future of TV Lunch v.1 TN.ppt - 15 -
WHAT DO YOU NEED TO DO ABOUT THIS
Segment and micro segment the consumer audience
Live the relevant consumer(s) view
Let go of the past
Experiment to find new value proposition(s)
Meet the consumer’s needs first