Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) Alexander Wolf (12568449) Supervisor : Dr. Peter...
-
date post
19-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
224 -
download
1
Transcript of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) Alexander Wolf (12568449) Supervisor : Dr. Peter...
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)
Alexander Wolf (12568449)
Supervisor : Dr. Peter Tischer
Presentation Overview
- Project Objectives
- Project Background
- Results
- Conclusion
- Future Work
Project Objectives
- Investigate filtering of fMRI data.
- Develop new filtering techniques.
- Develop software tools for fMRI analysis.
fMRI Introduction
- fMRI is a sequence of MRI’s over time.
- Images contain White Matter, Grey Matter, Cerebral-Spinal Fluid and Other.
- Basic unit in fMRI is the volume element (voxel).
fMRI Importance
- Neurologists use them to determine what regions of the brain where active/inactive for a known task performed by the subject.
- 3D fMRI image is segmented into active/inactive regions.
Filtering fMRI
- Anomalous values can occur due to motion, image capture.
- Leads to incorrect analysis, false conclusions.
- To account for anomalous values, consider filtering approach.
- Classical methodologies in fMRI such as FSL(FMRIB Software Library) and SPM(Statistical Parametric Mapping) have not considered filtering of any kind.
Filtering Objectives
- Recognition of anomalous data.
- Determine unreliable and reliable data.
- Determine whether voxel represents the same kind of voxels that belong together.
Filtering Importance
- Can determine whether we have enough data to work with so we can eliminate the need for motion compensation altogether.
- Determines proportion of voxels that are affected by motion compensation.
- Replace voxels by more meaningful values.
- Determine which voxels represent activation.
Filters Investigated
- Vector Median Filter(VMF)
- Tischer Least Change Filter(TLC)
- n-preserve Filter
- n-preserve Filter(New method).
- Least Change Filter(New method)
Vector Median Filter
- Replaces the center pixel by the pixel in the mask whose value is most inlying.
- Inlying is the value whose total sum of the absolute difference to every other pixel in the mask is minimised.
Original Noisy
Noise : Impulse, Probability: 0.1, Maximum Value : 255.
Vector Median Filtering
Original Filtered
RMSE : 3.92
Vector Median Filtering
Filtered
Noise Free. RMSE : 2.86
Vector Median Filtering
Tischer Least Change Filter
- Only replaces the center pixel if it is the most outlying value in the mask.
- Replaces it by the most similar value in the mask.
Original
Noise Free
Tischer Least Change
Original Filtered
RMSE : 0.38
Tischer Least Change
n-preserve Filter
- Given n, find the nth most nearest neighbour to the center pixel.
- Replace center pixel by the value which is the nth nearest neighbour
Original
Noise Free.
n-preserve Filter
n-preserve filter(New method)
- Extends n-preserve approach but instead finds the nth nearest neighbour whose total sum compared to its neighbours in the current region is minimised.
Filtered
Iteration = 1, n=2, Noise Free. RMSE: 1.41
n-preserve filter(New method)
Filtered
Iteration = 2, n=2, Noise Free. RMSE: 1.57
n-preserve filter(New method)
Least Change Filter (New Method)
- Extends TLC to preserve n-pixel features only if the center pixel is most outlying.
- Leave center pixel unchanged if it is not the most outlying.
Original Filtered
Iteration = 2, n=2, Noise Free. RMSE: 0.38
Least Change Filter (New Method)
Original Filtered
Iteration = 1, n=2, Noise Free. RMSE: 6.00
n-preserve Filter
Original Filtered
Iteration = 1, n=2, Noise Free. RMSE: 1.41
n-preserve filter(New method)
Original Filtered
Iteration = 1, n=2, Noise Free. RMSE: 0.38
Least Change Filter (New Method)
Conclusion
- VMF removes noise better than the other filters.
- VMF can blur edges and corners.
- VMF performance on noise-free images is not as good as other filters.
Conclusion cont’d
- TLC doesn’t work well when removing noise.
- TLC works well when preserving 2 pixel features.
- TLC is more suited to noise-free images to preserve original structure.
Conclusion cont’d
- n-preserve filter is good at preserving n pixel regions in the original image.
- n-preserve filter tends to destroy smaller pixel regions.
- Filters tend too have unavoidable consequences.
Conclusion cont’d
- New n-preserve filter works better on noisy/ noise-free images compared to original n-preserve filter.
- New Least Change Filter works almost as well as TLC to preserve 2 pixel regions.
Future Work
- Consider different fMRI parts of the anatomy such as heart, lungs, kidney and liver.
- Apply concept to different areas.
- Binarize the image to show active/inactive regions of the brain. Show connected regions.
THE END