Functional Dyspepsia - chuv.ch · Main differential diagnoses for dyspepsia 1. Peptic ulcer...

1

Transcript of Functional Dyspepsia - chuv.ch · Main differential diagnoses for dyspepsia 1. Peptic ulcer...

Page 1: Functional Dyspepsia - chuv.ch · Main differential diagnoses for dyspepsia 1. Peptic ulcer (chronic) 2. GERD (w/wo esophagitis) 3. Malignant disease 4. Functional dyspepsia ... effective

Functional Dyspepsia

Michael Fried Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology

University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland

Page 2: Functional Dyspepsia - chuv.ch · Main differential diagnoses for dyspepsia 1. Peptic ulcer (chronic) 2. GERD (w/wo esophagitis) 3. Malignant disease 4. Functional dyspepsia ... effective

Dyspepsia

Functional Dyspepsia

Non-GI Causes (cardiac disease,

muscular pain, etc.)

Structural Dyspepsia (GERD, PUD, pancreatic disease, gallstones, etc.)

Page 3: Functional Dyspepsia - chuv.ch · Main differential diagnoses for dyspepsia 1. Peptic ulcer (chronic) 2. GERD (w/wo esophagitis) 3. Malignant disease 4. Functional dyspepsia ... effective

Diagnostic Criteria* for Functional Dyspepsia

Rome III

* Criteria fulfilled for the last 3 months with symptom onset at least 6 months prior to diagnosis.

Must include one or more of the following:

and no evidence of structural disease (including upper endoscopy) to explain the symptoms

Bothersome postprandial

fullness

Early satiation

Epigastric pain

Epigastric burning or or or

Tack J et al, Gastroenterology, 2006;130:1466–1479

Page 4: Functional Dyspepsia - chuv.ch · Main differential diagnoses for dyspepsia 1. Peptic ulcer (chronic) 2. GERD (w/wo esophagitis) 3. Malignant disease 4. Functional dyspepsia ... effective

Pathophysiology ?

Carbone F and Tack J. Dig Dis 2014, 32: 222-229

Page 5: Functional Dyspepsia - chuv.ch · Main differential diagnoses for dyspepsia 1. Peptic ulcer (chronic) 2. GERD (w/wo esophagitis) 3. Malignant disease 4. Functional dyspepsia ... effective

Futagami S et al. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2015; 41: 177-188

Post‐infectious FD and IBS

Vorführender
Präsentationsnotizen
Meta‐analysis of six studies that demonstrated relative risk for post‐infectious FD and post‐infectious IBS. The relative risk and its confidence intervals (95% CI) for each study are plotted on a logarithmic sacle. The diamond‐shaped box represents the pooled relative risk and the 95% CI.
Page 6: Functional Dyspepsia - chuv.ch · Main differential diagnoses for dyspepsia 1. Peptic ulcer (chronic) 2. GERD (w/wo esophagitis) 3. Malignant disease 4. Functional dyspepsia ... effective

Do subtypes make sense?

• 27% non-specific

• 31% overlapping

Talley et al. 2001. J Clin Gastroenterol Talley et al. Gastroenterology 1993

Bytzer et al. Scand J Gastroenterology 1992

Lack of discriminant value of dyspepsia subgroups

Vorführender
Präsentationsnotizen
steht so in Rome II ist eine schöne Terminologie klinisch aber bedeutungslos, denn Überlappung und unspezifisch !!! hilft nicht, organische ursachen der Dyspepsie zu erkennen: 52. Bytzer P, Schaffalitzky de Muckadell O. Prediction of major pathological conditions in dyspeptic patients referred for endoscopy. A prospective validation study of a scoring system. Scand J Gastroenterol 1992;27:987–992. Talley NJ, Weaver AL, Tesmer DL, Zinsmeister AR. Lack of discriminant value of dyspepsia subgroups in patients referred for upper endoscopy. Gastroenterology 1993;105:1378–1386. Camillieri glaubt das nicht
Page 7: Functional Dyspepsia - chuv.ch · Main differential diagnoses for dyspepsia 1. Peptic ulcer (chronic) 2. GERD (w/wo esophagitis) 3. Malignant disease 4. Functional dyspepsia ... effective

Dyspepsia: a symptom complex

< 0.1% 1 symptom; 99% >2 symptoms; > 80% >5

Tack J et al, Gastroenterology, 2006;130:1466–1479

Page 8: Functional Dyspepsia - chuv.ch · Main differential diagnoses for dyspepsia 1. Peptic ulcer (chronic) 2. GERD (w/wo esophagitis) 3. Malignant disease 4. Functional dyspepsia ... effective

Ford AC et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010; 8: 830-837

Meta-analysis, 151 papers included, N= 5389 patients

Broad definition of dyspepsia

Rome 3 criteria for dyspepsia

Vorführender
Präsentationsnotizen
(A) Pooled prevalence of various endoscopic findings in studies using a broad definition of dyspepsia. (B) Pooled prevalence of various endoscopic findings in studies using the Rome criteria to define dyspepsia.
Page 9: Functional Dyspepsia - chuv.ch · Main differential diagnoses for dyspepsia 1. Peptic ulcer (chronic) 2. GERD (w/wo esophagitis) 3. Malignant disease 4. Functional dyspepsia ... effective

DD

Main differential diagnoses for dyspepsia 1. Peptic ulcer (chronic) 2. GERD (w/wo esophagitis) 3. Malignant disease 4. Functional dyspepsia

Diagnosis after exclusion

AGA Technical Review on the Evaluation of Functional Dyspepsia. Gastroenterology 2005

Vorführender
Präsentationsnotizen
4 major causes
Page 10: Functional Dyspepsia - chuv.ch · Main differential diagnoses for dyspepsia 1. Peptic ulcer (chronic) 2. GERD (w/wo esophagitis) 3. Malignant disease 4. Functional dyspepsia ... effective

Organic causes of dyspeptic symptoms

• Peptic clcer disease • GERD • Medications (ASA/NSAIDS, Abx) • Gastroparesis • Gastric neoplasm • Cholelithiasis, choledocholithiasis • Pancreatitis (acute or chronic) • Carbohydrate malabsorption • Ischemic bowel disease • Other GI malignancy (ep. Pancreatic cancer) • Systemic disease (DM, Thyroid, Parathyroid, CTD) • Intestinal parasites

Page 11: Functional Dyspepsia - chuv.ch · Main differential diagnoses for dyspepsia 1. Peptic ulcer (chronic) 2. GERD (w/wo esophagitis) 3. Malignant disease 4. Functional dyspepsia ... effective

Medications and dyspepsia

• NSAR cause dyspepsia in up to 20% of the patients (including COX-2 inhibitors)

• COX-2 inhibitor consumation decreases, but low dose aspirin use increases

• Identify: - Alendronat - Acarbose - Metformin - Orlistat - Digitalis - Theophylline - Potassium - Antibiotics (Erythromycin)

Hawkey et al. Gut 2003

Bytzer et Hallas. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2000 Ofman et al. Arthritis Rheum 2003

Vorführender
Präsentationsnotizen
Keine etablierten Daten zu dyspsie-induktion ausser bei NSAIDs
Page 12: Functional Dyspepsia - chuv.ch · Main differential diagnoses for dyspepsia 1. Peptic ulcer (chronic) 2. GERD (w/wo esophagitis) 3. Malignant disease 4. Functional dyspepsia ... effective

Overland MK. Med Clin N Am; 2014; 98: 549-564

Etiology of dyspepsic symptoms ?

Page 13: Functional Dyspepsia - chuv.ch · Main differential diagnoses for dyspepsia 1. Peptic ulcer (chronic) 2. GERD (w/wo esophagitis) 3. Malignant disease 4. Functional dyspepsia ... effective

Alarm symptoms and signs History • Weight loss

• Dysphagia

• Recurrent vomiting

• Icterus

• FA: Ca / Celiac d.

• Onset > 45 yrs

Signs

• Fever

• Pathological status

• GI bleeding signs

Lab

• Anemia, Fe-deficiency

• Leukocytosis

• CRP

Page 14: Functional Dyspepsia - chuv.ch · Main differential diagnoses for dyspepsia 1. Peptic ulcer (chronic) 2. GERD (w/wo esophagitis) 3. Malignant disease 4. Functional dyspepsia ... effective

Wallace MB et al. Gut 2001; 49: 29-34

Age > 45 or any alarm symptom as predictor of major endoscopic findings

Page 15: Functional Dyspepsia - chuv.ch · Main differential diagnoses for dyspepsia 1. Peptic ulcer (chronic) 2. GERD (w/wo esophagitis) 3. Malignant disease 4. Functional dyspepsia ... effective

• Canadian trial (7004 pts <45 years, dyspepsia, no alarm symptoms)

− 7% «significant» diagnoses – 31% normal – 30% gastritis – 23% reflux esophagitis

• Asian trial (387 pts, 45 years years, dyspepsia, no alarm symptoms)

− higher patients satisfaction by endoscopy (40 % vs 22 %)

• Danish trial (FD pts, 317 completed) − reassurance by endoscopy − cost-effective (but PPI at that time expensive)

Breslin et al. Gut 2000. 46:93-7 Mahadeva: Gut 2008. 57: 1214-20

Bytzer et al. Lancet 1994. 343:811-16

To scope or not? Benefit of upper gi endoscopy

Vorführender
Präsentationsnotizen
Wichtige Diagnosen: gastric ucer, neoplasm, esophageal stricture, varices, Barrett) Weitere Diagnosen: 17% Hiatushernie, 16%Duodenitis, 6.5% Duodenalulcus
Page 16: Functional Dyspepsia - chuv.ch · Main differential diagnoses for dyspepsia 1. Peptic ulcer (chronic) 2. GERD (w/wo esophagitis) 3. Malignant disease 4. Functional dyspepsia ... effective

Abdominal sonography ?

• explains only rarely patients symptoms

• therapeutic gain only 1-3%

- exclusion of pancreas pathology

- gallbladder stones mostly incidental

• not recommended in patients < 45 years

AGA Technical Review: Gastroenterology 2005; 129:1756-80

DGVS-Leitlinien – Z Gastroenterol 2001; 39:937-956

Page 17: Functional Dyspepsia - chuv.ch · Main differential diagnoses for dyspepsia 1. Peptic ulcer (chronic) 2. GERD (w/wo esophagitis) 3. Malignant disease 4. Functional dyspepsia ... effective

General therapeutic measures in FD ?

• Explanation of benign nature of disease ("re-assurance")

• Good patient-doctor relationship

• Dietary counceling (diet assessment, more meals, smaller portions, less fat, avoidance of nutrients which induce symptoms)

• Healthy life style

Talley et al. Am J Gastroenterol 2005 Lacy et al. AP&T 2012

Page 18: Functional Dyspepsia - chuv.ch · Main differential diagnoses for dyspepsia 1. Peptic ulcer (chronic) 2. GERD (w/wo esophagitis) 3. Malignant disease 4. Functional dyspepsia ... effective

Functional dyspepsia – always PPI ?

41 % (PPI) vs. 32 % (placebo) RR- reduction 10 % (95% CI, 2.7%– 17.3%) NNT 14

Wang WH et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007;5:178-85

Favors PPI Favors plac.

Metaanalysis (2007), 3725 patients

• PPI effective in patients with EPS and refluxlike symptoms, less effective in patients with PDS-type dyspepsia • Lower dose equivalent to standard dose (e.g.: 10 mg vs. 20 mg omeprazole)

Page 19: Functional Dyspepsia - chuv.ch · Main differential diagnoses for dyspepsia 1. Peptic ulcer (chronic) 2. GERD (w/wo esophagitis) 3. Malignant disease 4. Functional dyspepsia ... effective

PPI • Basic therapy • Effect independent of dose • More effective in EPS with refluxlike symptoms

• Newer data

– Japan: PPI monotherapy better than H2-RA + prokinetic for PDS – China: PPI more effective for treatment of epigastric burning than

pain, postprandial fullness, early satiety

Sakaguchi et al. World J Gastroenterol. 2012; 18: 1517-24 Xiao et al. Am J Gastroenterol 2010;105: 2026-31

Vorführender
Präsentationsnotizen
Japanese trial: 114 Patienten mit Rabeprazol 10mg 1x/Tag versus Famotidine 10mg BID plus Mosapride 5mg TID für 4 Wochen
Page 20: Functional Dyspepsia - chuv.ch · Main differential diagnoses for dyspepsia 1. Peptic ulcer (chronic) 2. GERD (w/wo esophagitis) 3. Malignant disease 4. Functional dyspepsia ... effective

Symptom improvement after HP -Eradication?

• metaanalysis (Cochrane database) 2006, 21 RCT / 3566 pts.

• H. pylori eradication has a small (but significant) effect in H.pylori positive functional dyspepsia

• NNT = 15

Suzuki et al, J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2011; 17 Moayyedi P et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006

Page 21: Functional Dyspepsia - chuv.ch · Main differential diagnoses for dyspepsia 1. Peptic ulcer (chronic) 2. GERD (w/wo esophagitis) 3. Malignant disease 4. Functional dyspepsia ... effective

Antidepressants for functional dyspepsia ?

12 heterogenous small studies: relative risk reduction 45% vs placebo

2/4 studies with levosulpiride

Hojo M et al. J Gastroenterol 2005;40:1036-42

Page 22: Functional Dyspepsia - chuv.ch · Main differential diagnoses for dyspepsia 1. Peptic ulcer (chronic) 2. GERD (w/wo esophagitis) 3. Malignant disease 4. Functional dyspepsia ... effective

Antidepressants

• Amitryptiline (Saroten®; 3x10mg/d) • Japanese RCT, 27 FD patients with no response to H2-RA/prokinetics

Otaka M et al. APT 2006; 21S:42-46

Page 23: Functional Dyspepsia - chuv.ch · Main differential diagnoses for dyspepsia 1. Peptic ulcer (chronic) 2. GERD (w/wo esophagitis) 3. Malignant disease 4. Functional dyspepsia ... effective

Hypnotherapy ?

Calvert EL et al. Gastroenterol 2002;123:1778-85

126 patients randomized to • hypnotherapy (3 not completed) • supportive therapy (13 not completed) • conventional treatment (10 not completed)

Page 24: Functional Dyspepsia - chuv.ch · Main differential diagnoses for dyspepsia 1. Peptic ulcer (chronic) 2. GERD (w/wo esophagitis) 3. Malignant disease 4. Functional dyspepsia ... effective

Functional dyspepsia – prokinetics ?

Hiyama T et al. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007;22: 304-10

Metaanalysis 2007, 27 studies: relative risk reduction (symptom free): 33% with prokinetic vs. plac NNT=6 BUT: • no longterm data • 21/27 studies with cisapride (unavailable) • domperidon (Motilium®) and metoclopramide (Paspertin®): less

effective than cisapride

Veldhuyzen, van Zanten, Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96: 689-696

Page 25: Functional Dyspepsia - chuv.ch · Main differential diagnoses for dyspepsia 1. Peptic ulcer (chronic) 2. GERD (w/wo esophagitis) 3. Malignant disease 4. Functional dyspepsia ... effective

Prokinetics: Levosulpiride (Dogmatil®)

Mearin F et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004.2: 301-308 Corazza GR, Biagi F, Albano O, et al. It J Gastroenterol 1996; 28: 317-323

Mansi C et al. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2000;14:56156-9

• Action − peripheral and central D2-receptor antagonist, partial ENS 5-HT4

agonist • Effects − more potent than domperidone, metoclopramide and cisparide to

reduce FD symptoms − similar efficacy to accelerate gastric emptying as cisapride

• Dose − 3x25mg - 3x50mg/d (Sanofi-Aventis, 50mg capsules) • Side effects − gastrointestinal, tachykardia, prolactin elevation

Vorführender
Präsentationsnotizen
Sulpirid Stada 50mg 100 Tabletten 18.5 Euro (Tagespreis 25 Cent (30 Rappen)
Page 26: Functional Dyspepsia - chuv.ch · Main differential diagnoses for dyspepsia 1. Peptic ulcer (chronic) 2. GERD (w/wo esophagitis) 3. Malignant disease 4. Functional dyspepsia ... effective

Lacy BE et al. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012; 36: 3-15

Vorführender
Präsentationsnotizen
Proposed treatment algorithm for FD. In this algorithm the patient with dyspepsia undergoes an upper endoscopy which, by definition, has to be grossly normal. If biopsies for Helicobacter pylori (HP) were performed and were negative (upper left corner) then the patient should be treated with a daily proton pump inhibitor (PPI). If symptoms (Sx) do not improve after 4–8 weeks, a therapeutic trial with a TCA should be initiated (the percentage of patients with FD symptom resolution is shown in parentheses). If upper endoscopy is grossly normal but gastric biopsies were not obtained for H. pylori, then the algorithm should begin with an assessment of H. pylori prevalence (upper right side). If present, H. pylori should be treated and the occasional patient with H. pylori will experience FD symptom resolution. If the patient is H. pylori-negative, then PPI therapy should be initiated (upper middle of diagram). The percentage of H. pylori-negative FD patients previously treated with a PPI and then a TCA, who will improve with an anti-nociceptive agent or CAM, is unknown. Therapeutic Gain (T.G.) refers to the reported symptom improvement rate above the placebo response (i.e. not including the placebo response). The overall Response Rate (R. R.) refers to the overall response rate which includes the placebo response. For example, on the right hand side of the diagram, the therapeutic gain (T.G.) of treating an FD patient who is H.P (+) has been reported as 6–14%. Alternatively, this portion of the figure could have been labelled using the overall response rate (R.R.) for FD symptom improvement in a patient treated for HP, which is approximately 31–39%, as this includes the placebo response rate which is approximately 25%.
Page 27: Functional Dyspepsia - chuv.ch · Main differential diagnoses for dyspepsia 1. Peptic ulcer (chronic) 2. GERD (w/wo esophagitis) 3. Malignant disease 4. Functional dyspepsia ... effective

Zala A et al. Expert Opin Emerging Drugs 2015; 20:221-233

Page 28: Functional Dyspepsia - chuv.ch · Main differential diagnoses for dyspepsia 1. Peptic ulcer (chronic) 2. GERD (w/wo esophagitis) 3. Malignant disease 4. Functional dyspepsia ... effective

• FD: disturbed motility, sensitivity, inflammation, brain factors • GI infections are risk factors for FD • Low predictive value of FD symptoms for a positive diagnosis • Alarm symptoms do not reliably predict organic disease • Patients with FD should at least have once a gastroscopy;

value of ultrasound is uncertain • PPIs are basic FD therapy, independent if patients present

reflux-like symptoms or not • HP eradication is effective in a small subgroup • Some (amitryptiline) antidepressants are effective to treat FD • Hypnotherapy has a long-term effect on FD symptoms • Prokinetics (sulpiride; acotiamide) should be tried if PPI, HP

eradication and antidepressants have failed

Take home messages

Page 29: Functional Dyspepsia - chuv.ch · Main differential diagnoses for dyspepsia 1. Peptic ulcer (chronic) 2. GERD (w/wo esophagitis) 3. Malignant disease 4. Functional dyspepsia ... effective

Pierre-Auguste Renoir. Le déjeuner des canotiers