Functional analysis of XPE and XPD proteins in regard to the … · 2010-09-29 · Roc1. DDB1....
Transcript of Functional analysis of XPE and XPD proteins in regard to the … · 2010-09-29 · Roc1. DDB1....
Functional analysis of XPE and XPD proteins in regard to the phenotypes of xeroderma pigmentosum patients
Kiyoji TanakaGraduate School of Frontier Biosciences
Osaka University
Videoconference for the DNA Repair Interest Group NIH, September 21, 2010
Photo: 祇王寺、京都Gi-ohji Temple, Kyoto
Topics:The DDB2 complex-mediated ubiquitylation around DNA damage is oppositely regulated by XPC and Ku, and contributes to the recruitment of XPA
MMXD, a TFIIH-independent XPD-MMS19 protein complex involved in chromosome segregation
The DDB2 complex-mediated ubiquitylation around DNA damage is oppositely regulated by XPC and Ku,
and contributes to the recruitment of XPA
Arato TakedachiMasafumi Saijo
Takedachi et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2010
DDB1DDB2
XPCHR23B
PCNA
DNA pol ε or δ
RPA
XPGXPF
ERCC1
TFIIH
XPA
Nucleotide excision repair (NER)
Global genome NER(GGR)
Transcription-coupled NER(TCR)
RNA pol II
CyclobutanePyrimidine dimer
[CPD]
CH
3 NH2
O
N
O
O
N
N NH
H
H
H
(6-4) Photoproduct[(6-4)PP]
H
NH2
CH3
O
O
N
ONN
NH
UV-damaged DNA binding protein (UV-DDB)
UV-damaged-DNA binding protein (UV-DDB) is a heterodimer composed of two subunits, DDB1 and DDB2, and plays a key role in DNA damage recognition at an early stage of global genome nucleotide excision repair (GGR) pathway.
Mutations in DDB2 are responsible for xeroderma pigmentosum group E (XP-E).
UV-DDB is integrated in a complex including Cul4A and Roc1, and displays ubiquitin ligase (E3) activity.
Cul4ARoc1
DDB1DDB2
E2
Cul4ARoc1
Ub
substrate
Ub
Ub E1
E2
E1E2Ub
E1Ub
ATP
ADP+Pi
+
Cul4ARoc1
DDB1DDB2
XPCHR23B
UV-damaged DNA binding protein (UV-DDB)
Cul4ARoc1
DDB1
XPCHR23B
UbUb
Ub
Ub
Ub
Cul4ARoc1
DDB1DDB2
UbCul4ARoc1
DDB1DDB2
Ub
Ub
“Hand-off from UV-DDB to the XPC complex at the damaged site.”
“Destabilization of chromatin structure”
DDB2
UV-damaged-DNA binding protein (UV-DDB) is a heterodimer composed of two subunits, DDB1 and DDB2, and plays a key role in DNA damage recognition at an early stage of global genome nucleotide excision repair (GGR) pathway.
Mutations in DDB2 are responsible for xeroderma pigmentosum group E (XP-E).
UV-DDB is integrated in a complex including Cul4A and Roc1, and displays ubiquitin ligase (E3) activity.
E2
Cul4ARoc1
Ub
substrate
Ub
Ub E1
E2
E1E2Ub
E1Ub
ATP
ADP+Pi
+
Ub
UV-damaged DNA binding protein (UV-DDB)
Cul4ARoc1
DDB1DDB2
XPCHR23B
Ub
Cul4ARoc1
DDB1DDB2
Ub
Ub
“Hand-off from UV-DDB to the XPC/HR23B at the damaged site.”
“Destabilization of chromatin structure”
Cul4ARoc1
DDB1
XPCHR23B
UbUb
UbDDB2
Mutant DDB2 derived from XP-E patients
Functions of the DDB2 E3 complex in the damage-recognition step of GGR
Regulatory mechanisms for the E3 activity of the DDB2 complex
Mutant DDB2 derived from XP-E patients
WT
K24
4E
anti-DDB1
anti-DDB2
anti-Cul4A
anti-Roc1
R27
3H
∆31
3-42
7
Vect
or
pcDNA3-FLAG-DDB2 WT / HeLaK244E
Whole cell extract
anti-FLAG IP
R273H∆313-427
<Purification of the DDB2 proteins>
The K244E DDB2 protein forms an E3 complex
Cul4ARoc1
DDB1DDB2
DDB2Exon No.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 910
100 300 427 a.a.
…Nuclear localization signal …WT-40 repeat motif
K244E (A905G)
<mutation> <patient>
XP82TO200
R273H (G933A) XP2ROXP3RO
∆313-427 Ops1
WT
The K244E DDB2 complex displays E3 activityDDB2
Exon No.1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 910
100 300 427 a.a.
…Nuclear localization signal …WT-40 repeat motif
K244E (A905G)
<mutation> <patient>
XP82TO200
R273H (G933A) XP2ROXP3RO
∆313-427 Ops1
WT
Cul4ARoc1
DDB1
WT
K24
4ER
273H
∆31
3-42
7
Vect
orB
uffe
r
WT
K24
4ER
273H
∆31
3-42
7
Vect
orB
uffe
rUb-DDB2DDB2
kDa250150100
755037
Poly-ubiquitinchain
kDa250150100
755037
DDB2UbUbiquitin ligase reaction (14µl)
50 mM
E3
Tris-HCl (pH 7.6)MgCl2DTTCaCl2ATP
UbcH5α; E2
UbiquitinE1
10 mM1 mM
0.2 mM4 mM5 µg
0.1 µg0.4 µg
kDa
WT
K24
4E
DDB1
DDB2
Cul4A
Roc1
CSN1CSN2CSN3CSN4CSN5CSN6CSN7
CSN8
250150100
75
50
37
25
15
20
Purification of the K244E DDB2 complexDDB2
Exon No.1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 910
100 300 427 a.a.
…Nuclear localization signal…WT-40 repeat motif
K244E (A905G)<mutation>
<patient>XP82TO
pCAGGS-FLAG-HA-DDB2 WT / HeLa
Whole cell extract
anti-FLAG IP
anti-HA IP
<Purification of the DDB2 complexes>
WTDDB1
Cul4ARoc1
CSN
K244EDDB1
Cul4ARoc1
CSN
200
Silver staining
K244E
histones
anti-DDB1
anti-Cul4A
anti-HA (DDB2)
anti-Roc1
anti-H3
anti-H4
UbiquitinGST-UbiquitinE2 (UbcH5a)E2 (UbcH5a d.n.)Histone octamersReaction time (min)
The K244E DDB2 complex mediates histone ubiqitylation in vitro
kDa
250150100
755037
1520
10
kDa
250150100
755037
25
15
20
1025
1520
10
150100150100
75
Buf
fer
Moc
k
WT
K24
4E
+ +-
- +-
-- -
++ -- +
+ +- -
+-
+ +
+ ++ ++ + + + + --- -- -- - --- + +
++ ++ ++ + + + +-60 00 60 60
Buf
fer
Moc
k
WT
K24
4E
+ +-
- +-
-- -
++ -- +
+ +- -
+-
+ +
+ ++ ++ + + + + --- -- -- - --- + +
++ ++ ++ + + + +-60 00 60 60
Cul4ADDB1
Roc1DDB2
Ub
UbUb
Ub
DNA (UV-)DNA (UV+) -
--
--
-++
++
++
WT
K24
4E
Moc
k
anti-DDB1
anti-Cul4A
anti-HA (DDB2)
anti-CSN7
anti-Roc1
Unbound fr.Bound fr.
Unbound fr.Bound fr.
Unbound fr.
Bound fr.
Unbound fr.
Bound fr.
Unbound fr.
Bound fr.
The K244E DDB2 complex does not bind to UV-damaged DNA
Amplification of the biotinylated DNA (165 bp)
UV-irradiation (10 kJ/m2)
Incubation with DDB2 (WT or K244E) complex
Unbound fr. Bound fr.
Immobilization on beads
Streptavidinebeads
K244EDDB1
Cul4ARoc1
CSN
CSN
DNA (UV-)DNA (UV+) -
--
--
-++
++
++
WT
K24
4E
Moc
k
anti-DDB1
anti-Cul4A
anti-HA (DDB2)
anti-CSN7
anti-Roc1
Unbound fr.Bound fr.
Unbound fr.Bound fr.
Unbound fr.
Bound fr.
Unbound fr.
Bound fr.
Unbound fr.
Bound fr.
The K244E DDB2 complex does not bind to UV-damaged DNA
Amplification of the Biotinylated DNA (165 bp)
UV-irradiation (10 kJ/m2)
Incubation with DDB2 (WT or K244E) complex
Unbound fr. Bound fr.
Immobilization on beads
Streptavidinebeads
Cul4ARoc1WTDDB1
Cul4ARoc1
The wild-type, but not K244E DDB2 complex is associated with core histones in a UV-dependent manner
pCAGGS-FLAG-HA-DDB2 WT / HeLa
UV-irradiation (20 J/m2, 0 min)
anti-FLAG IP
anti-HA IP
Solubilized chromatin fr.
- - -+ + +
WT
K24
4E
Moc
k
UVanti-DDB1anti-Cul4Aanti-HA (DDB2)anti-Roc1
anti-H2Aanti-H2Banti-H3anti-H4
K244E
The wild-type, but not K244E DDB2 complex is associated with core histones in a UV-dependent manner
pCAGGS-FLAG-HA-DDB2 WT / HeLa
UV-irradiation (20 J/m2)
anti-FLAG IP
anti-HA IP
Solubilizedchromatin fr. (C)
-WT K244E
0
DDB1
Cul4A
DDB2
Roc1H2AH2B
H3
H4
15 30 60 120 - 0 15 30 60 120NCNCNCNCNCNC NCNCNCNCNCNC
minfr.kDa
150
1007550
15
0, 15, 30, 60, 120 minNuclear extract (N)
K244E
Silver staining
Wild-type, but not K244E DDB2 is distributed to UV-damaged sites in chromatin in vivo
WT
K244E
UV-
UV+
UV-
UV+
anti-HA(DDB2) anti-XPC merge TO-PRO3pCAGGS-FLAG-HA-
DDB2 WT / HeLa
UV-irradiation (100 J/m2)[5-µm isopore filter]
Immunostaining
K244E
0 min
UV (100 J/m2)
5-µm isopore filter
Schematic representation of the strategy to measure thein vitro binding of DDB2 complex to UV-damaged chromatin
Mock or UV irradiated DNA
Mono-nucleosome reconstitution
Immobilization on beads
Incubation with DDB2 complex
Supernatant(Unbound fr.)
Beads(Bound fr.)
In vitro ubiquitylation reaction
Flow-through fr. Released fr. Retained fr.
Streptavidinebeads
In vitro ubiquitylation reaction
UV -- -- --+ ++ ++ +
Moc
k
anti-DDB1
anti-Cul4A
anti-HA (DDB2)
anti-CSN7
anti-Roc1
- - -+ + +
Flow-through RetainedReleased
WT
K24
4EM
ock
WT
K24
4EM
ock
WT
K24
4E
kDa 150100
3725
1520
250150100
250150100
755037
fr.
The wild-type, but not K244E DDB2 complex can mediate histone ubiquitylation around damaged sites in vitro
Mock or UV irradiated DNA
Mono-nucleosome reconstitution
Immobilization on beads
Incubation with DDB2 complex
Supernatant(Unbound fr.)
Beads(Bound fr.)
In vitro ubiquitylation reaction
Flow-through fr. Released fr. Retained fr.
CSN
Cul4ADDB1
Roc1K244E
Ub
UbUb
UV -- -- --+ ++ ++ +
Moc
k
anti-DDB1
anti-Cul4A
anti-HA (DDB2)
anti-CSN7
anti-Roc1
- - -+ + +
Flow-through RetainedReleased
WT
K24
4EM
ock
WT
K24
4EM
ock
WT
K24
4E
kDa 150100
3725
1520
250150100
250150100
755037
fr.
The wild-type, but not K244E DDB2 complex can mediate histone ubiquitylation around damaged sites in vitro
Mock or UV irradiated DNA
Mono-nucleosome reconstitution
Immobilization on beads
Incubation with DDB2 complex
Supernatant(Unbound fr.)
Beads(Bound fr.)
In vitro ubiquitylation reaction
Flow-through fr. Released fr. Retained fr.
Cul4ARoc1
DDB1WT
Ub
UbUb
CSN
Cul4ADDB1
Roc1WT
UV-DDB1WT
Ub
Roc1Ub
Cul4A
Ub
Ub
UbUb
UV -- -- --+ ++ ++ +
Moc
k
anti-H2B
anti-H3
- - -+ + +
RetainedReleased
WT
K24
4EM
ock
WT
K24
4EM
ock
WT
K24
4E
kDa
37
25
15
20
250150100
7550
fr.
25
15
20
Flow-through
The wild-type, but not K244E DDB2 complex can mediate histone ubiquitylation around damaged sites in vitro
Mock or UV irradiated DNA
Mono-nucleosome reconstitution
Immobilization on beads
Incubation with DDB2 complex
Supernatant(Unbound fr.)
Beads(Bound fr.)
In vitro ubiquitylation reaction
Flow-through fr. Released fr. Retained fr.
CSN
Cul4ADDB1
Roc1K244E
Ub
UbUb
UV -- -- --+ ++ ++ +
Moc
k
anti-H2B
anti-H3
- - -+ + +
RetainedReleased
WT
K24
4EM
ock
WT
K24
4EM
ock
WT
K24
4E
kDa
37
25
15
20
250150100
7550
fr.
25
15
20
Flow-through
The wild-type, but not K244E DDB2 complex can mediate histone ubiquitylation around damaged sites in vitro
Mock or UV irradiated DNA
Mono-nucleosome reconstitution
Immobilization on beads
Incubation with DDB2 complex
Supernatant(Unbound fr.)
Beads(Bound fr.)
In vitro ubiquitylation reaction
Flow-through fr. Released fr. Retained fr.
Cul4ARoc1
Ub
Ub
DDB1WT
Ub
DDB1WT
Ub
CSNRoc1
Ub
Cul4A
Ub
Ub
ConclusionsBoth DNA-binding and E3 activities of the DDB2 complex are required to promote GGR in chromatin
K244E DDB2 was able to form the cullin-based E3 complex. However, this complex did not bind to nucleosomes in the UV-irradiated cells.The K244E DDB2 complex did not bind to the UV-damaged DNA or the nucleosomesbearing the UV-irradiated DNA, and consequently was not able to mediate the ubiquitylation of the nucleosomes assembled on UV-damaged DNA.
Functions of the DDB2 E3 complex in the DNA damage-recognition step of GGR
Ub
UV-damaged DNA binding protein (UV-DDB)
Cul4ARoc1
DDB1DDB2
Ub
XPCHR23B
Ub
Cul4ARoc1
DDB1DDB2
Ub
“Hand-off from UV-DDB to the XPC complex at the damaged site.”
“Destabilization of chromatin structure”
Cul4ARoc1
DDB1
XPCHR23B
UbUb
UbDDB2
Ub
UV-damaged DNA binding protein (UV-DDB)
Cul4ARoc1
DDB1DDB2
Ub
XPCHR23B
Ub
Cul4ARoc1
DDB1DDB2
Ub
“Hand-off from UV-DDB to the XPC complex at the damaged site.”
“Destabilization of chromatin structure”
Cul4ARoc1
DDB1
XPCHR23B
UbUb
UbDDB2
Another possibility…
“The DDB2 complex-mediated ubiquitylation around damaged sites in chromatin may serve as a signal for the recruitment of other NER factors.”
The ectopically expressed wild-type DDB2 is colocalized with endogenous XPA
WT
K244E
UV-
UV+
UV-
UV+
anti-HA(DDB2) anti-XPA merge TO-PRO3pCAGGS-FLAG-HA-
DDB2 WT / HeLa
UV-irradiation (100 J/m2)[5-µm isopore filter]
Immunostaining
K244E
0 min
UV (100 J/m2)
5-µm isopore filter
Schematic representation of the strategy
Immobilization on beads
Beads
Retained fr.
Mock or UV irradiated DNA
Mono-nucleosome reconstitution
Incubation with DDB2 complex
Supernatant
In vitro ubiquitylation reaction
Flow-through fr. Released fr.
III III Cul4ADDB1
Roc1DDB2
Ub
Ub
UbUb
Cul4ADDB1
Roc1DDB2
II
I
III
Immobilization on beads
Beads
Retained fr.
Mono-nucleosome (UV- / UV+)
Mono-nucleosome (UV+)+DDB2 complex
Mono-nucleosome (UV+)+DDB2 complex+ubiquitylation
Incubation with
Flow-through fr. Bound fr.
XPC-HR23BorXPA
III
II
I
Cul4ARoc1
Ub
Ub37
25
1520
250150100
7550
25
1520
anti-H2B
anti-H3
anti-XPC
Inpu
tUV-
-+
+ -+-
++
+ +- +
+- +DDB2
Ub - -- +- -- +
fr.Flow-through Bound
anti-XPA
Inpu
tUV-
-+
+ -+-
++
+ +- +
+- +DDB2
Ub - -- +- -- +
Flow-through Boundfr.
The DDB2 complex-mediated ubiquitylation around damaged sites facilitates the recruitment of XPA
kDa
DDB1DDB2
Ub
Cul4ADDB1
Roc1DDB2
Ub
Conclusions
Implication for the DDB2 complex-mediated ubiquitylation in GGR
The DDB2 complex-mediated ubiquitylation around the damaged sites in chromatin functions in the signaling pathway during the recognition step in GGR.
Both DNA-binding and E3 activities of the DDB2 complex are required to promote GGR in chromatin
K244E DDB2 was able to form the cullin-based E3 complex. However, this complex did not bind to nucleosomes in the UV-irradiated cells.The K244E DDB2 complex did not bind to the UV-damaged DNA or the nucleosomesbearing the UV-irradiated DNA, and consequently was not able to mediate the ubiquitylation of the nucleosomes assembled on UV-damaged DNA.
The DDB2 complex-mediated ubiquitylation around damaged sites in nucleosomesenhanced the recruitment of XPA to lesions.
Regulatory mechanisms for the E3 activity of the DDB2 complex
- - -+ + +
WT
UVanti-DDB1anti-Cul4Aanti-HA (DDB2)anti-Roc1
anti-H2Aanti-H2B
anti-H3anti-H4
anti-XPC
The wild-type, but not K244E DDB2 complex interacts with the modified forms of XPC in a UV-dependent manner
pCAGGS-FLAG-HA-DDB2 WT / HeLa
UV-irradiation (20 J/m2, 0 min)
anti-FLAG IP
anti-HA IP
Solubilized chromatin fr.
K244E K24
4E
Moc
k
The wild-type, but not K244E DDB2 complex interacts with Ku in a UV-dependent manner
pCAGGS-FLAG-HA-DDB2 WT / HeLa
UV-irradiation (20 J/m2, 0 min)
anti-FLAG IP
anti-HA IP
Solubilized chromatin fr.
K244E
anti-Ku70anti-Ku86
- - -+ + +
WT
UVanti-DDB1anti-Cul4Aanti-HA (DDB2)anti-Roc1
anti-H2Aanti-H2B
anti-H3anti-H4
anti-XPC
K24
4E
Moc
k
DD
B2
IPXP
G IP
anti-XPGanti-DDB2Nanti-Ku86anti-Ku70anti-MAT1anti-H3
Schematic representation of the strategy to measurethe effect of XPC/HR23B or Ku on the DDB2 E3 activity
UV irradiated DNA
Mono-nucleosome reconstitution
Immobilization on beads
Incubation with DDB2 complex
Incubation with XPC-HR23B
In vitro ubiquitylation reaction (Ku -/+)
Released fr. Retained fr.
Cul4ADDB1
Roc1WT
XPCHR23B
Cul4ADDB1
Roc1WT
Nucleosome-free
WTDDB1
Cul4ARoc1
CSN
WTDDB1
Cul4ARoc1
CSN
XPCHR23B
Nucleosome-free
CSN
Cul4ADDB1
Roc1DDB2
XPCHR23B
Cul4ADDB1
Roc1DDB2
UV irradiated DNA
Mono-nucleosome reconstitution
Immobilization on beads
Incubation with DDB2 complex
Incubation with XPC-HR23B
In vitro ubiquitylation reaction (Ku -/+)
Released fr. Retained fr.
30 min reactionanti-HA (DDB2)
250150100
75
50
XPC stimulates the E3 activity of the DDB2 complex especially at damaged sites
anti-HA(DDB2)60 min reaction
250150100
75
50
kDa
++ -- --- -+ +- -+ - -- + -
RetainedReleased
-- ++ +++ +- -+ +- + ++ - +-- ++ --- -- -+ +- + -- - +-- -- ++- -+ ++ +- - +- + +
Ku70/86E2
d.n. E2
Nucleosome-freefr.XPC-HR23B
CSN
Cul4ADDB1
Roc1DDB2 Ub
Cul4ADDB1
Roc1DDB2
XPCHR23B
Ub
Ub
Ub
UV irradiated DNA
Mono-nucleosome reconstitution
Immobilization on beads
Incubation with DDB2 complex
Incubation with XPC-HR23B
In vitro ubiquitylation reaction (Ku -/+)
Released fr. Retained fr.
anti-Ku70100
75100kDa
++ -- --- -+ +- -+ - -- + -
RetainedReleased
-- ++ +++ +- -+ +- + ++ - +-- ++ --- -- -+ +- + -- - +-- -- ++- -+ ++ +- - +- + +
E2d.n. E2
Nucleosome-free
75anti-Ku86
fr.XPC-HR23B
Ku70/86
Cul4ADDB1
Roc1DDB2
XPCHR23B
Ku86Ku70
Cul4ADDB1
Roc1DDB2Ku86
Ku70
Ku inhibits the E3 activity of the DDB2 complex
Cul4ADDB1
Roc1DDB2
UV irradiated DNA
Mono-nucleosome reconstitution
Immobilization on beads
Incubation with DDB2 complex
Incubation with XPC-HR23B
In vitro ubiquitylation reaction (Ku -/+)
Released fr. Retained fr.
anti-HA(DDB2)
250150100
75
50
kDa
++ -- --- -+ +- -+ - -- + -
RetainedReleased
-- ++ +++ +- -+ +- + ++ - +-- ++ --- -- -+ +- + -- - +-- -- ++- -+ ++ +- - +- + +
E2d.n. E2
Nucleosome-free
Ku inhibits the E3 activity of the DDB2 complex
60 min reaction
fr.XPC-HR23B
Ku70/86
Nucleosome-free
CSN
Cul4ADDB1
Roc1DDB2Ub
Cul4ADDB1
Roc1DDB2
XPCHR23B
Ub
Ku86Ku70
Ub
Ku86Ku70
Ku86Ku70
anti-HA (DDB2)
kDa+ - -
RetainedReleasedfr.
++ - + -- + -- + - - +- - -+ + + - +Ku70/86
E2d.n. E2
15
20
250150100
75
50
100150
10anti-Roc1
10075
10075
10075
anti-DDB1
anti-Cul4A
anti-Ku70
anti-Ku86
Ku physically interacts with the DDB2 complex and acts as a negative regulator for the E3 activity
The DDB2 complex
Immobilization on anti-FLAG beads
In vitro ubiquitylation reaction (Ku- / +)
Released fr. Retained fr.
(FLAG-HA-DDB2 WT)
Cul4ADDB1
Roc1DDB2anti-FLAG
beads
anti-XPC
anti-HA(DDB2)
merge
TO-PRO3
si control si Ku86
0 min 15 minUV- UV+
0 min 15 minUV- UV+
sico
ntro
lsi
Ku8
6
anti-β-tubulinanti-Ku86
Ku affects the localization of DDB2to the damaged sites in vivo
pCAGGS-FLAG-HA-DDB2 / HeLa
UV-irradiation (100 J/m2)[5-µm isopore filter]
Immunostaining
Transfection of siRNAs
ConclusionsBoth DNA-binding and E3 activities of the DDB2 complex are required to promote GGR in chromatin
Various regulatory mechanisms for the E3 activity of the DDB2 complex
Implication for the DDB2 complex-mediated ubiquitylation in GG-NER
The DDB2 complex-mediated ubiquitylation around the damaged sites in chromatin functions in the signaling pathway during the recognition step in GGR.
K244E DDB2 was able to form the cullin-based E3 complex. However, this complex did not bind to nucleosomes in the UV-irradiated cells.
The K244E DDB2 complex did not bind to the UV-damaged DNA or the nucleosomesbearing the UV-irradiated DNA, and consequently was not able to mediate the ubiquitylation of the nucleosomes assembled on UV-damaged DNA.
CSN is released from the DDB2 complex when the complex binds to lesions. Correspondingly, the E3 activity of the DDB2 complex was stimulated.XPC stimulated the E3 activity of the DDB2 complex especially at damaged sites by stabilizing it.Ku negatively regulates the E3 activity of the DDB2 complex by destabilizing it.
The DDB2 complex-mediated ubiquitylation around damaged sites in nucleosomesenhanced the recruitment of XPA to lesions.
Ku particularly inhibits the extensive autoubiquitylation of DDB2, and consequently prevents the dissociation of the DDB2 complex from damaged sites.
CSN
Model for the mechanism of damage recognition in GGR
Cul4ADDB1
Roc1WT
CSN
Cul4ARoc1
DDB1K244E
Cul4ADDB1
Roc1WT
XPCHR23B
Ku86Ku70
Cul4ADDB1
Roc1WT
XPCHR23B
Ub
Cul4A
DDB1
Roc1
WTKu86
Ku70
UbUb
Cul4A
Ub
Roc1Ub
DDB1WT
Ub
Ub Ub
XPA
Topics:The DDB2 complex-mediated ubiquitylation around DNA damage is oppositely regulated by XPC and Ku, and contributes to the recruitment of XPA
MMXD, a TFIIH-independent XPD-MMS19 protein complex involved in chromosome segregation
MMXD, a TFIIH-independent XPD-MMS19 protein complex involved in chromosome segregation
Shinsuke ItoLi Jing TanDaisuke AndohTakashi NaritaMineaki Seki
Ito S et al., Mol Cell, 2010
XP-AXP-BXP-CXP-DXP-EXP-FXP-GCS-ACS-BTTD-A
XP
XP
XP/CS, TTD
XPXP, XP/CSCSCSTTD
XPXP, XP/CS, TTD
Groups DisordersNER activity
UV-sensitivity GGR TCR Gene
+++++
+
++
+±
++
+
++++
+
ーーーーーーー
ー
ーー
ーーーーーーー
XPAXPB(ERCC3)XPCXPD(ERCC2)XPE(DDB2 XPFXPG(ERCC5)CSA(ERCC8)CSB(ERCC6)TTDA
Genetic Complementation groups in XP, CS and TTD
(p8)
Multi-functions of XPD protein- is one of the components of TFIIH, which has roles in nucleotide excision repair,basal transcription, transactivation and possibly cell cycle control.
- has a 5’ – 3’ DNA helicase and ATPase activities essential for nucleotide excisionrepair but dispensable for transcription. (F Coin et al., Mol Cell 26: 245, 2007)
- directly interacts with p44 and MAT1, serves as molecular bridge of holo-TFIIH, andfacilitate optimal transcription. (S Dubaele et al., Nat Genet 20: 184, 1998; P Schultz etal., Cell 102: 599, 2000; B Sandrock et al., JBC 276: 35328, 2001; F Coin et al, Mol Cell11: 1635, 2003)
- a fraction of XPD is associated with CAK but not with the core TFIIH. (JT Reardon etal., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 6482, 1996)
-Drosophila Xpd was shown to negatively regulate CAK activity, resulting indecreased phosphorylation of the cdk1 T-loop and inhibition of mitotic progression,while Xpd expression was down-regulated at G2/M when cdk1 was most active (JChen et al., Nature 424: 228, 2003)Lack of Drosophila Xpd also cause defects in the dynamics of mitotic spindle andchromosomal instability, subcellular re-localizing of Cdk7 (X Li et al., Plos Genetics 6: e1000876, 2010)
MMS19 and XPD complexes
MMS19 complex(MMXD)
XPD complex(XPG-TFIIH)
Knockdown of MMS19 and MIP18 in HeLa cells
* Non-specific band
MIP18 can directly interact with MMS19 and XPD
MMS19 interacts with XPD in the region between the MAT1- and p44-binding domains (aa 438–637)
MMXD (MMS19-MIP18-XPD) complex
Co-localization of MIP18, MMS19 and GFP-XPD with alpha-tubulinin the mitotic phase of HCT116 cells
Scale bar: 10 μm
Co-localization of GFP-XPD and MMS19 with alpha-tubulin, but not XPB in the mitotic phase of HCT116 cells
scale bar: 10μm
Enhanced frequency of abnormal mitotic spindle and chromosomesegregation in MMS19-, MIP18-, and XPD-knockdown HCT116 cells
Blue: DAPI (chromosome)Green: alpha-tubulinRed:cy3-prelabeled siRNA
Abnormal localization of Aurora B in the MMS19- and MIP18-knockdown HeLa cells
Enhanced frequency of abnormal nuclei in MMS19-, MIP18-, and XPD-knockdown HCT116 cells
% fr
eque
ncy
FAM96B is designated MIP18 (MMS19-interacting protein 18 kDa)
Possible functions of the MMXD protein complex in chromosome segregation
Cohesion between sister chromatids Formation of centrosome and/or mitotic spindles. Spindle checkpoint
Yeast yhr122w cells mutated in the putative yeast counterpart of MIP18exhibited a chromosome instability phenotype, which is mostly associated with a defect in the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion.
Subunits of cohesins and condensins harbor HEAT repeats, which are frequently found in proteins required for chromosome dynamics including chromosome segregation, chromatin remodeling, and DNA repair. MMS19 contains HEAT repeat. It is plausible that the HEAT repeat in MMS19 functions with cohesins and condensins.
Relevance of MMXD-dysfunction to clinical featuresof XP-D, XP-D/CS and XP-D/TTD patients
Frequencies of abnormal nuclei at inter-phase, and aberrant mitoticspindle and chromosomal segregation were examined in the cellsderived from patients with XPD mutations.
XPD-patients’ cells:XP6BE (XP-D) XPCS-2 (XP-D/CS) TTD1RO (XP-D/TTD)
Wild-type XPD cDNA-corrected isogenic cells: XPD/XP6BE XPD/XPCS-2XPD/TTD1RO
Abnormal mitotic spindle and chromosome segregation in the metaphase cells derived from XP-D and XP-D/CS patients
Green: gamma-tubulin Red: alpha-tubulin Blue: DAPI
Abnormal mitotic spindle and chromosome segregation in the metaphase cells derived from XP-D, XP-D/CS and XP-D/TTD patients
Abnormal chromosome segregationAbnormal mitotic spindle
Abnormal nuclei in the interphase cells derivedfrom XP-D(XP6BE) and XP-D/CS(XPCS-2) patients
Green: gamma-tubulin Blue: DAPI
Abnormal nuclei in the interphase cells derived from XP-D, XP-D/CS and XP-D/TTD patients
Clinical implication of MMXD-dysfunction:The results indicate that the function of MMXD in chromosome segregation was affected in XP6BE (XP-D) and XPCS-2 (XP-D/CS) patients’ cells, but not in TTD1RO (XP-D/TTD) patient cells.
It is worth noting that these three patients had defects in NER, while skin tumors were detected only in XP6BE and XPCS-2 patients, not in TTD1RO patient.
These findings suggest that the dysfunction of MMXD due to the XPDmutations lead to aneuploidy and/or cell death, contributing at least partly to the phenotypes in XP6BE and XPCS-2 patients such as a high incidence of skin tumors.
Collaboration
Photo: 長谷寺、奈良Hasedera Temple, Nara
Graduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka UniversitySuita, Osaka, Japan
Yasushi HiraokaYasuhiro Hirano
AcknowledgementsJean-Marc Egly (IGBMC, France)
Wim Vermeulen (Erasmus University, The Netherlands)
Takeshi Horio (Kansai Medical University, Japan)
Errol C. Friedberg (University of Texas, USA)
Cherry Blossom, Osaka