Fuel CELLS Hidekel MORENO LUNA HC 399
description
Transcript of Fuel CELLS Hidekel MORENO LUNA HC 399
FUEL CELLS
HIDEKEL MORENO LUNAHC 399
PEM applications
What is a fuel cell?
Basic definition: A device that creates
electricity by a chemical reaction.
Composed by two electrodes are respectively called anode(+) and cathode(-) that carried a redox reaction. The reaction is speed up by the calalyst.
Usually hydrogen is the fuel in conjunction with oxygen.
Every cell generates a amount of energy that can be couple with others to create a cell or a stack. The purpose of such is to make current do work outside of the system(cell), that powering an electric motor.
Types of Fuel Cells Metal Hydride Fuel Cell Electro-galvanic Fuel Cell Direct Formic Acid Fuel Cell;
DFAFC Zinc Air Battery Microbial Fuel Cell Upflow Microbial Fuel Cell;
UMFC Regenerative Fuel Cell Direct Bromohydride Fuel Cell Alkaline Fuel Cell Direct Methanol Fuel Cell Reformed Methanol Fuel Cell Direct-Ethanol Fuel Cell Proton Exchange Membrane
Fuel Cell; PEM RFC-Redox Phosphoric Acid Fuel Cell Molten Carbonate Fuel
Cell;MCFC Tubular Solid Oxide Fuel
Celll;TSOFC Protonic Ceramic Fuel Cell Direct Carbon Fuel Cell Planar Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Enzymatic Biofuel Cells.
Fuel Cell Name Electrolyte Qualified Power (W) Working Temperature (°C) Electrical efficiency Status
Metal hydride fuel cellAqueous alkaline
solution (e.g.potassium hydroxide)
above -20(50% Ppeak @ 0°C) Commercial/Research
Electro-galvanic fuel cellAqueous alkaline
solution (e.g., potassium hydroxide)
under 40 Commercial/Research
Direct formic acid fuel cell (DFAFC)
Polymer membrane (ionomer) to 50 W under 40 Commercial/Research
Zinc-air batteryAqueous alkaline
solution (e.g., potassium hydroxide)
under 40 Mass production
Microbial fuel cell Polymer membrane or humic acid under 40 Research
Upflow microbial fuel cell (UMFC) under 40 Research
Regenerative fuel cell Polymer membrane (ionomer) under 50
Commercial/Research
Direct borohydride fuel cellAqueous alkaline
solution (e.g., sodium hydroxide)
70 Commercial
Alkaline fuel cellAqueous alkaline
solution (e.g., potassium hydroxide)
10 kW to 100 kW under 80 Cell: 60–70%System: 62%
Commercial/Research
Direct methanol fuel cellPolymer
membrane (ionomer)
100 mW to 1 kW 90–120Cell: 20–30%
System: 10–20%Commercial/
Research
Reformed methanol fuel cell
Polymer membrane (ionomer)
5 W to 100 kW(Reformer)250–
300(PBI)125–200
Cell: 50–60%System: 25–40%
Commercial/Research
Direct-ethanol fuel cellPolymer
membrane (ionomer)
up to 140 mW/cm² above 25? 90–120
Research
Proton exchange membrane fuel cell
Polymer membrane
(ionomer) (e.g., Nafion or
Polybenzimidazole fiber
)
100 W to 500 kW (Nafion)50–120(PBI)125–220
Cell: 50–70%System: 30–50%
Commercial/Research
$30–35 per watt
RFC - RedoxLiquid electrolytes with redox shuttle & polymer
membrane (Ionomer)1 kW to 10 MW
Phosphoric acid fuel cellMolten phosphoric acid
(H3PO4)up to 10 MW 150-200
Cell: 55%System: 40%Co-Gen: 90%
Molten carbonate fuel cellMolten alkaline carbonate (e.g., sodium bicarbonate
NaHCO3)100 MW 600-650 Cell: 55%
System: 47%
Tubular solid oxide fuel cell (TSOFC)O2--conducting ceramic
oxide (e.g., zirconium dioxide, ZrO2)
up to 100 MW 850-1100 Cell: 60–65%System: 55–60%
Protonic ceramic fuel cell H+-conducting ceramic oxide
700 Research
Direct carbon fuel cell Several different 700-850Cell: 80%
System: 70%Commercial/
Research
Planar Solid oxide fuel cell
O2--conducting ceramic oxide (e.g., zirconium dioxide, ZrO2 Lanthanum
Nickel Oxide La2XO4,X= Ni,Co,
Cu.)
up to 100 MW 850-1100 Cell: 60–65%System: 55–60%
Commercial/Research
Enzymatic Biofuel Cells
Any that will not denature the
enzyme (usually aqueous buffer).
under 40 Research
Main Applications
Back up power
Base load power plants
Electric and hybrid vehicles
Auxiliary power
Off-grid power supply
Notebook computers
Belt charges for cell phones or palms
Smart phones( GPS)
Mass Transportation
Fuel Cell ChallengesCost:
the cost of power systems must be reduced before they can be competitive with convectional technologies. For stationary systems is $400-750/KW and is now as much as $1000/KW on initial applications.
Durability and Reliability:there is no durability established for some fuel cell systems. For stationary applications , more than 40,000 hrs. of reliable operation in a temperature range of 35˚C-40˚C.
System sizeif wanted to use in the automobile industry the size and weight must be reduced to give a higher efficiency.
Air, thermal and water managementthe compressor used for some cells is not suitable for non-stationary applications such as automobiles. Also the thermal and water management for fuel cells are issues between the ambient and operating temperatures that makes cells add an extra component for large heat exchangers.
PEM
Description: With an operation temperature relatively
low have a large energy density can vary their output quickly to meet shifts in power demand.
According to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), "they are the primary candidates for light-duty vehicles, for buildings, and potentially for much smaller applications such as replacements for rechargeable batteries”
How a PEM fuel cell works The electrolyte; proton conducting
membrane separates the anode and the cathode.
On one side hydrogen diffuses to the anode catalyst where it later dissociates into protons and electrons. These protons react with oxidants causing it to become like a multi-faliciiltated proton membranes(MFPM). The protons are conducted through the membrane to the cathode; while the electrons travel in an external circuit because the membrane is electrically insulated.
On the cathode oxygen molecules react with electrons and protons to make water! In either liquid or vapor.
ContinuedPEM fuel cell transforms the chemical
energy liberated during the electrochemical reaction of hydrogen and oxygen to electrical energy as opposed to the direct combustion of hydrogen and oxygen to produce thermal energy.
Applications and cost for PEM applications Off –power supply Portable power Transportation
$30-35 /W
http://www.ballard.com/files/pdf/Spec_Sheets/PEM_FC_Product_Portfolio_docmetrics.pdf
http://www.ballard.com/files/pdf/Case_Studies/Bus_Benefits_docmetrics.pdf
Government Investment 41.9 million this year April 15 Given to some states
Arkansas (FedEx East:35 fuel systems for a complete lift truck 1.3 million) California (Jadoo Power: usage of 1kW fuel cell power systems as opposed to
traditional gas/diesel generators and lead acid batteries 1.8 million, Polyfuel: integrate and minituarize the components of Polyfuel’s power system for use in mobile computing)
Colorado(Anheuser-Bush: will deploy 23 fuel systems as battery replacements for a complete fleet of electric lift trucks 1.1 million)
Massachusetts( Nuvera Fuel Cells: to accelerate market penetration of fuel cells in conjunction with East Penn Manufacturing will deploy 10 fuel cell fork lifts)
Michigan(Delphi Automobile: to test and demonstrate 3-5 kW solid oxide fuel cells, SOFC, auxiliary power for heavy duty commercial class 8 trucks 2.4 million)
New York( MTI microfuel cells:accelerate fuel cell use in electronic use 2.4 million, Plug power validate the durability of plug power 5-kW stationary combined heat and power fuel cell system verifying commercial readiness and other project for Gencore rack –mounted fuel cell product that provides clean and highly reliable emergency backup power for a total of 6.1 million)
Pensylvannia( GENCO: will deploy 156 fuel cell systems as battery replacements for fleets of electric lift trucks 6.1 million)
Texas( Sysco of Houston: will deploy 90 fuel cell system for battery replacement for a fleet of pallet trucks 1.2 million)
Virginia( Sprint Communications: demonstrate viability of packaged 1-kW to 10-kW fuel cell systems with 72 hrs. of onsite fuel storage for back power 7.3 million)
Washington( ReliOn: add reliability to a utility communications network were no backup power was previously available at 25 sites will deploy 180 fuel cell system to locations of AT&T mobile network 8.6 million)
Production Processes
Central Biomass
GasificationCentral Coal Gasification
Central Coal
Gasification with
CO2 Capture
Central Natural
Gas Reforming
Central Natural
Gas Reforming with CO2 Capture
Central Water
Electrolysis
Forecourt Water
Electrolysis 1500
kg/day [3]
Forecourt Ethanol
Reforming, 1500
kg/day [4]
Forecourt Natural
Gas Reforming,
1500 kg/day [4]
Energy Inputs, Raw Units [2] Farmed Trees, kg 12.839 - - - - - - - -Natural Gas, Nm3 0.170 - - 4.501 4.489 - - - 4.488Ethanol, gallons - - - - - - 2.191 -Electricity, kWh 1.600 - 1.720 0.569 1.406 53.440 55.178 2.457 3.077Pittsburgh #8 Coal, kg - 8.508 7.849 - - - - - - Energy Inputs, Common Units Farmed Trees, Btu 237,919 - - - - - - -Natural Gas, Btu 5,901 - - 156,249 155,833 155,798Ethanol, Btu 167,239 Electricity, Btu 5,459 - 5,867 1,942 4,796 182,345 188,277 8,385 10,501As Received Bituminous Coal, Btu - 223,253 205,960 - - - - - Energy Outputs, Raw Units [2] Hydrogen, kg 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000Electricity, kWh - 3.175 - - - - - - Energy Outputs, Common Units Hydrogen, Btu 113,940 113,940 113,940 113,940 113,940 113,940 113,940 113,940 113,940Electricity, Btu - 10,834 - - - - - - Conversion Efficiencies [5] 45.7% 55.9% 53.8% 72.0% 70.9% 62.5% 60.5% 64.9% 68.5%
Conclusion
PEM’s offer a great option for stationary power systems and backup power and are good overall for commercial applications such as forklifts and buses.
Some future fuel cell technologies might give an arise to other promising fuel cells such as SOFC and MCFC.
Questions/Comments
Sources http://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/ann
ual_progress08.html http://www1.eere.energy.gov/hydrog
enandfuelcells/ http://www.fuelcells.org http://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc
e?_ob=MImg&_imagekey=B6TG0-3TYMR5D-S-D&_cdi=5240&_user=576687&_orig=search&_coverDate=08%2F21%2F1998&_sk=999569975&view=c&wchp=dGLbVzz-zSkWA&_valck=1&md5=3ed76fa4875d8e6c3d3b32bc880a9700&ie=/sdarticle.pdf
http://www.ballard.com/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel_cell