Fsibl (riyadh)
-
Upload
mahatab-uddin -
Category
Internet
-
view
273 -
download
0
Transcript of Fsibl (riyadh)
Welcometo my
presentation
Mahmudul HasanID No: 11121101202
BBA,26th IntakeMajor in Finance
PRESENTATION
On
Financial performance Analysis of Janata Bank
Objectives of the ReportMethodology of the ReportLimitation of the StudyCustomers’ Perception Regarding the Financial performance Analysis of Janata BankFindings of the StudyRecommendationsConclusion
As a mandatory requirement of the Bachelor of Business Administration (BBA) program, I was assigned to do my internship in JBL for a period of three months. For the completion of BBA degree I have got an opportunity to do my internship at JanataBank Ltd.Without practical exposure theory can never be acquired.
Background of the report
Broad Objective:The prime objective of this report is to analyze the Financial performance Analysis of Janata Bank.
Objective
The following objectives can be listed as the
specific objectives for this study:
To assess the liquidity position of Janata Bank Ltd. To examine the asset management quality of
Janata Bank Ltd. To analyze the debt position of Janata Bank Ltd. To evaluate the profitability position of Janata
Bank Ltd.
Objective Continue
Specific objectives:
DATA & METHODOLOGY
Annual report of JBL (20012 to 2013) Various reports related to study Website of JBL. www.jbl-bd.com Monthly statement of the branch.
The study, credit operation of Janata bank ltd, is analytical in nature.
Description and sources of data:
Methodology:
LIMITATION OF THE STUDYSome of the limitations I have face while preparing this Report
are listed as follows:
Time Limitation: To complete the study, time was limited by three months. It was really very short time to know details about an organization like Janata Bank Ltd.
Inadequate data: Lack of available information about of Janata Bank Ltd. Because of the unwillingness of the busy key persons, data collection became hard. The employees are extremely busy to perform their duty.
Lack of record: Large scale research was not possible due to constrains and restrictions posed by the organization.
ANALYSIS PART
Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Current Asset 155364.59 170124.18 211780.5 227310 285730.53
Current Liabilities 153319.68 167016.14 199259.3 219102.7 275583.75
Current ratio (times) 1.01 1.01 1.06 1.03 1.04
2009 2010 2011 2012 20130.980.99
11.011.021.031.041.051.061.07
1.01 1.01
1.06
1.031.04
Current ratio (In millions)
Current Ratio
Graphical Presentation:
(In millions)
Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Current Asset 155364.59 170124.18 211780.47 227310.99 285730.53
Current Liabilities 153319.68 167016.14 199259.27 219102.72 275583.75
Net working capital 2044.91 3108.04 12521.21 8207.27 10146.78
2009 2010 2011 2012 20130
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
2044.913108.04
12521.21
8207.27
10146.78
Net working capital (In millions )
Net Working Capital (In millions)
Graphical Presentation:
Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Total Asset 293662 345234 440349 511129 586083
Total Liabilities 279802 325288 410918 494809 548967
Debt ratio (%) 95.28 94.22 93.31 96.80 93.67
2009 2010 2011 2012 201391
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
95.28%
94.22%
93.31%
96.8%
93.67%
Debt ratio (%) (In millions)
Debt Ratio(In millions)
Graphical presentation:
Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Time Interest Earned Ratio (Times) 1.33 1.54 1.60 1.41 0.35
2009 2010 2011 2012 20130.000.200.400.600.801.001.201.401.601.80
1.331.54 1.6
1.41
0.35
Times Interest Earned Ratio (Times)
Time interest earned ratio
Graphical presentation:
Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Return on Asset 1.00% 0.77% 1.12% (3.50%) 1.42%
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
-4.00%
-3.00%
-2.00%
-1.00%
0.00%
1.00%
2.00%
1.00%0.77%
1.12%
-3.50%
1.42%
Return on Asset
Return on Asset (ROA)
Graphical presentation:
Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
ROE 23.38% 27.80% 16.32% (49.74%) 30.09%
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
-60.00%
-50.00%
-40.00%
-30.00%
-20.00%
-10.00%
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
23.38%27.80%
16.32%
-49.74%
30.09%
ROE
Return on Equity (ROE)
Graphical presentation
Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Net profit 300.43 491.16 421.45 (15280.34) 9551.39
Operating profit 8578.12 12036.40 15722.32 14533.8 12127
Net profit margin 3.50% 4.08% 2.68% (105.15) 7.88%
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
-120.00%
-100.00%
-80.00%
-60.00%
-40.00%
-20.00%
0.00%
20.00%
3.50% 4.08% 2.68%
-105.15%
7.88%
Net profit margin (BDT in millions)
Net Profit Margin
Graphical presentation
Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Cost to income ratio 77.98% 70.65% 61.31% 60.68% 64.37%
2009 2010 2011 2012 20130.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
77.98%70.65%
61.31% 60.68%64.37%
Cost to income ratio
Cost to Income Ratio
Graphical presentation:
MAJOR FINDINGS
The study, Financial performance analysis of JBL, reveals
the following major findings. JBL’s current ratio was fluctuated mode from 2009 to 2013. In 2009,
JBL was maintaining 1.01 tk. Current assets against 1 tk.
Current liability but in 2010 its current ratio is equal to 2009. In 2013 the current ratio has decreased to 1.04
JBL’s time interest earned ratio has increased except in 2012 and 2013.
Cost to Income ratio is in decreasing trend from 2009 to 2012 but in 2013 this ratio has increased aging to 64.37% from 60.68% in previous year.
Net profit margin was fluctuating from 2009 to 2011. But in 2012 net profit margin dramatically decreased to (105.15) %. But in 2013 it again increased to 7.88%.
The study of Financial performance analysis of JBL requires the following recommendations.
Current ratio of JBL is enough to recover its current
liabilities through it was decreased in 2013 than 2012.
JBL should reconsider its capital structure with a view to decrease its debt level and achieve an optimum capital structure.
As cost to income ratio is increased in 2012, bank should reduce the operating cost to decrease the ratio.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Internship is a bridge between theoretical knowledge and
practical knowledge. Now that I have completed my
Internship, I believe the experience I have gathered working
in the official environment will be proven vital for me to go
ahead in my professional life. During my internship I have
realized how modern Science and Information Technology
have been contributing more and more to the development
of operational and management process. To serve customers
well, companies need to be skillful in many areas faster
development of new business strategies, shrinking company
formalities, reducing procedure times, improving customer
service and increasing and maintaining knowledge for
accomplishing all these goals.
CONCLUSION