Fruit Logistica 2016 Logistics Hub Session 10 lin
-
Upload
danie-schoeman -
Category
Documents
-
view
47 -
download
2
Transcript of Fruit Logistica 2016 Logistics Hub Session 10 lin
‘Anything, anywhere, anytime’: What does this mean for the fresh produce sector?
Danie Schoeman
The anything, anywhere, anytime challenge
© 2016 Danie Schoeman & Company.
Challenges abound
17%
22%
30%
32%
17%
42%
25%
45%
37%
35%
7%
19%
23%
29%
32%
32%
32%
39%
39%
48%
Not enough visibility into our supply chain within our “four walls” (store-store, store-DC, store-direct, etc.)
Not enough visibility into the supply chain outside our “four walls”
Information gleaned from our processes and systems comes toolate to enable corrective action
We do not have the ability to determine optimal (lowest cost)locations for cross-channel order fulfilment
Our supply chain is not designed for the current / projectedvolume of direct-to-consumer shipments
Direct to consumer shipments are not fast enough
We don't have good visibility into how demand flows throughour selling channels
Our stores were not designed for current / projected volume ofomni-channel order fulfilment
Marketing promotions cause unintended consequences onsupply chain
The volume of returns is increasing as a result of consumeromni-channel purchases
Top operational challenges around supply chain execution
Leaders Followers
RSR Research: Retail Supply Chain Execution: New Requirements To Meet New Demand Benchmark Report 2015
© 2016 Danie Schoeman & Company.
Challenges abound
17%
22%
30%
32%
17%
42%
25%
45%
37%
35%
7%
19%
23%
29%
32%
32%
32%
39%
39%
48%
Not enough visibility into our supply chain within our “four walls” (store-store, store-DC, store-direct, etc.)
Not enough visibility into the supply chain outside our “four walls”
Information gleaned from our processes and systems comes toolate to enable corrective action
We do not have the ability to determine optimal (lowest cost)locations for cross-channel order fulfilment
Our supply chain is not designed for the current / projectedvolume of direct-to-consumer shipments
Direct to consumer shipments are not fast enough
We don't have good visibility into how demand flows throughour selling channels
Our stores were not designed for current / projected volume ofomni-channel order fulfilment
Marketing promotions cause unintended consequences onsupply chain
The volume of returns is increasing as a result of consumeromni-channel purchases
Top operational challenges around supply chain execution
Leaders Followers
RSR Research: Retail Supply Chain Execution: New Requirements To Meet New Demand Benchmark Report 2015
Omni-channel order fulfilment and returns
Direct-to-consumer speed and volume
Supply chain visibility
© 2016 Danie Schoeman & Company.
Are you ready?
33%
26%
29%
10%
2%
No capability
Inconsistent
Competent
Efficient
High performing
How prepared do you think your organization is to handle omni-
channel retailing?
Nearly one third of the retailers participating in the study said they are not prepared to handle omni-channel retailing.
2015 19th Annual Third-Party Logistics Study.
© 2016 Danie Schoeman & Company.
Let’s try something
10.7%
14.5%
19.2%
20.3%
22.2%
29.3%
36.4%
Order online – in-vehicle pickup
Mobile order – pickup in store
Order online – pickup in store
Order in store – pickup at warehouse
Mobile order – pickup at warehouse
Order in store – deliver to home
Order online – pickup at warehouse
Do you offer / enable cross-channel fulfilment?
3.4%
4.0%
7.4%
11.4%
12.4%
15.4%
16.1%
23.8%
50.0%
Bike/messenger delivery
Drone delivery
Online order with one hour
Locker pickup
Customer delivery
Sunday delivery
Home delivery from stores
Other innovative solutions
None
Which of the following fulfilment strategies are you utilizing / piloting / considering?
Both shippers and 3pls offer a variety of cross-channel fulfilment options, while shippers are testing and using a variety of other fulfilment options.
2015 19th Annual Third-Party Logistics Study.
© 2016 Danie Schoeman & Company.
Behind closed doors
12%
30%
38%
30%
25%
43%
45%
3%
13%
19%
36%
48%
52%
52%
We are still organized with separate silos for eachchannel
Marketing's increasing influence internally is drivingunintended supply chain consequences
New channels to the consumer are emerging fasterthan we can assess their impact or support
We haven't figured out how to align incentives forsales credit for cross-channel sales
Our supply chain metrics are too focused on efficiencyat the expense of flexibility
Lack of confidence in inventory accuracy
Lack of coordination between supply chain,merchandising, and marketing
Top organizational inhibitors to making supply chain execution improvements
Leaders Followers
Lack of coordination/collaboration, lack of investment and antiquated metrics are the main inhibitors.
RSR Research: Retail Supply Chain Execution: New Requirements To Meet New Demand Benchmark Report 2015
© 2016 Danie Schoeman & Company.
65%
53%
77%
75%
42%
55%
61%
74%
Too many inventorytransfers between stores
Too many out of stocks instores
Too much inventory instores
Inaccurate inventorylevels in stores
Agreed or Strongly agreed: "We have..."
Leaders Followers
An aching, persistent pain
Inventory accuracy and levels continue to be a stumbling block.
RSR Research: Retail Supply Chain Execution: New Requirements To Meet New Demand Benchmark Report 2015
© 2016 Danie Schoeman & Company.
73%
76%
82%
65%
94%
97%
Increase flexibility by holdingmore work-in-processinventory, rather than
finished goods
Source more from emerging,lower-cost markets as existingmarkets get more expensive
Source/replenish closer to thepoint of demand
Agreed or Strongly Agreed: “Our supply chain currently needs to…
Leaders Followers
The endless search for lowest-cost sources
Retail leaders show more concern about keeping what’s been working for them i.e. sourcing from emerging lower-cost markets while simultaneously having a more agile supply chain via more localized sourcing and replenishment closer to the point of demand.
RSR Research: Retail Supply Chain Execution: New Requirements To Meet New Demand Benchmark Report 2015
© 2016 Danie Schoeman & Company.
… causing increased complexity and fragility
As global sourcing and international transportation volumes grow, so do the risks and complexities, making the supply chain evermore fragile.
Full of risk
© 2016 Danie Schoeman & Company.
Sea piracy
Based on info from IMO, IMB, ReCAAP
© 2016 Danie Schoeman & Company.
Cargo theft
FreightWatch International
© 2016 Danie Schoeman & Company.
Corruption
2014 Transparency International
© 2016 Danie Schoeman & Company.
Customs “integrity”
Brazil
Russia
India
ChinaSouth Africa
Morocco
Rwanda
Nigeria
Gabon
Ghana
Ethiopia
Benin
Angola
Uganda
Cameroon
Gambia
Kenya
Egypt
Hong Kong
Indonesia
Korea, Rep.
Malaysia
Philippines
Singapore
Taiwan
Thailand
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Cu
sto
ms
Tran
spar
ency
Ind
ex
Irregular Payments (1 = common, 7 = never occurs)
Honest Joe’sHonest Crooks
AngelsDark Horses
DS&C Analysis, WEF ETI (2014)
Ready or not, here IoT comes
© 2016 Danie Schoeman & Company.
HomeChore automation
and security$200B−350B
The Internet of Things (IoT) brings huge opportunity …
HumanHealth and
fitness$170B−1.6T
OfficesSecurity and
energy$70B−150B
FactoriesOperations and
equipment optimization$1.2T−3.7T
VehiclesAutonomous vehicles and
condition-based maintenance$210B−740B
OutsideLogistics and navigation
$560B−850B
CitiesPublic health
and transportation$930B−1.7T
WorksitesOperations optimization/
health and safety$160B−930B
Retail environmentsAutomated checkout
$410B−1.2T
Enable new business models
For example, remote monitoring enables anything-
as-a-service
Transform business processes
Predictive maintenance, better asset utilization, higher
productivity
Types of opportunities
9 settingsgave us a cross-sector view of
a total potential impact of$3.9 trillion–11.1 trillion
per year in 2025
McKinsey Global Institute (MGI): The internet of things: mapping the value beyond the hype, 2015
© 2016 Danie Schoeman & Company.
… but also creates great peril
Almost all cyber attacks can be classified by 9 patterns
0.1%
0.7%
0.8%
3.9%
4.1%
15.3%
20.6%
25.1%
29.4%
Payment card skimmers
Point of sale intrusions
Cyber espionage
Denial of service attacks
Web app attacks
Physical theft and loss
Insider and privilege misuse
Crime ware
Miscellaneous errors
72%ON AVERAGE
of the incidents in an industry can be described by just three of the nine patterns.
Verizon 2015 Data Breach Investigations Report
© 2016 Danie Schoeman & Company.
Typical cyber attack incidents for retail and transport & logistics
70% 11% 10%Retail
POS intrusion Crimeware Payment card skimmer
24% 16% 16%Transportation
Cyber-espionage Insider and privilege misuse Web app attacks
PAYMENT CARD SKIMMERSThe physical installation of a “skimmer” on an ATM, forecourt gas pump or POS terminal, to read your card data as you pay.
CRIMEWARECrimeware is a broad category, covering any use of malware (often web-based) to compromise systems such as servers and desktops. This pattern includes phishing.
POINT-OF-SALE (POS) INTRUSIONSWhen attackers compromise the computers and servers that run POS applications, with the intention of capturing payment data.
WEB APP ATTACKSWhen attackers use stolen credentials or exploit vulnerabilities in web applications — such as content management systems (CMS) or e-commerce platforms.
INSIDER AND PRIVILEGE MISUSEThis is mainly by insider’s misuse, but outsiders (due to collusion) and partners (because they are granted privileges) show up as well. Potential culprits come from every level of the business, from the frontline to the boardroom.
CYBER-ESPIONAGEWhen state-affiliated actors breach an organization, often via targeted phishing attacks, and after intellectual property.
Verizon 2014 & 2015 Data Breach Investigations Report
Last mile killed the e-tailer star
© 2016 Danie Schoeman & Company.
The last mile to nowhere
• These failed e-tailers staked out “the last mile“ delivery to consumers as their basis of competition
• They tried to combine the convenience of online ordering with nearly “instant gratification“ of bricks-and-mortar retailers
• Unfortunately, physical delivery does not benefit from the network effect that supports other types of information-economy businesses
The last mile led these e-tailers to the gallows rather than to the promised land …
(1998-2001)
(1999-2001)
(1998-2000)
strategy+business: The Last Mile to Nowhere: Flaws & Fallacies in Internet Home-Delivery Schemes, 2000
© 2016 Danie Schoeman & Company.
The last mile is the expensive killer
Collection4% Sorting
6%
Line haul37%
Last Mile Delivery
53%
The last mile element of the home-delivery model represents more than 50% of the total logistics cost and is fraught with challenges.
Mark Millar: Global Supply Chain Ecosystems - Strategies for Competitive Advantage in a Complex, Connected World, 2015
© 2016 Danie Schoeman & Company.
Food creates traffic for the last mile
169.6 158.5133.7 133.9
101.565.1 51.3 27.5 20 20.1
8.8
255.7 244.5
186.3161.3
150
105 60.831.1 25.3 24.5 10.6
Total number of deliveries (m) generated by online orders by product type
2013 2018
Barclays: The Last Mile - Exploring the online purchasing and delivery journey, 2014
Food is responsible for the third highest number of deliveries on the last mile.
© 2016 Danie Schoeman & Company.
How consumers want to be serviced
2.4
8.7
1.9
5.4
5.8
2.9
82.2
32.7
71.8
2.2
18.5
Collection at courier’s depot
Collection at post office
Home delivery friend via the retailer vehicle
Home delivery friend via a courier
Home delivery friend via postal service
Click & collect, different shop
Home delivery via postal service
Home delivery via the retailer vehicle
Home delivery via a courier
Collection at locker or collection point
Click & collect, shop you ordered from
-14.5
-11.8
-10.7
-11
-10.7
-8.9
-5.4
-4.2
-4.4
-9.5
-5.6
6.2
7.4
6.8
7.7
7.4
12.5
10
10
10.6
19.4
18.5 12.9
9.9
4.6
3.6
-3.3
-3.3
-3.9
-4.4
-8.3
6.2
5.8
Barclays: The Last Mile - Exploring the online purchasing and delivery journey, 2014
Percentage of consumers using different delivery methods for goods purchased online over the past 12 months
Percentage of consumers using different delivery methods over
the next year, compared to the last
Consumers anticipate that they will use in-store click & collect or locker collection services more frequently in the future.
© 2016 Danie Schoeman & Company.
How retailers want to service consumers
21.4
19.3
8.6
18.2
2.5
29.2
Home delivery via postal service
Own delivery vehicle
Third party click & collect
Home delivery via a courier
Locker or collection point
Own click & collect
Chart Title
Series1
-10.7
-10.0
0.0
-10.7
-6.5
-7.3
7.1
8.1
0.0
13.4
9.4
15.5
Chart Title
Use less Use more
8.3
2.9
2.8
0.0
-1.9
-3.6
Barclays: The Last Mile - Exploring the online purchasing and delivery journey, 2014, *DSC Analysis
Retailers are spot on with click & collect, but are missing a trick with locker collection points. They might also over invest in delivery fleet.
Retailers’ preferences for delivery methods(Percentage of respondents)
Percentage of consumers using different delivery methods over the
next year, compared to the last*
© 2016 Danie Schoeman & Company.
Most important factor for consumers when choosing a delivery option:
1. Cost
2. Speed
3. Flexibility
4. Reputation
5. Service
What consumers want
Barclays: The Last Mile - Exploring the online purchasing and delivery journey, 2014, *DSC Analysis
Waste not want not
© 2016 Danie Schoeman & Company.
We waste billions
Every year around the globe
1.3 BILLION TONNES OF
Global quantitative food losses and wastefor each commodity group per year
In industrialized countries, consumers throw away 286 million tonnes of cereal products.
CEREALS
30%
FISH AND SEAFOOD
FRUITS AND VEGETABLES
MEAT
OILSEEDS AND PULSES
ROOTS AND TUBERS
DAIRY PRODUCTS
20%
45%
20%
20%
45%
35%8% of fish caught globally is thrown back into the sea. In most cases they are dead, dying or badly damaged.
In Europe alone, 29 million tonnes of dairy products are lost are wasted every year.
Along with roots and tubers, fruit and vegetables have the highest wastage rates of any food products; almost half of all the fruit and vegetables produced are wasted.
Of the 263 million tonnes of meat produced globally, over 20% is lost or wasted.
Every year, 22% of the global production of oilseeds and pulses is lost or wasted.
In North America & Oceania alone, 5 814 000 tonnes of roots and tubers are wasted at the consumption stage alone.
is
that is
OF ALL FOODPRODUCED FORHUMAN CONSUMPTION
lost or wasted
⅓FAO
© 2016 Danie Schoeman & Company.
Food loss as a supply chain issue
WEF: Enabling Trade - From Farm to Fork, 2014
Production, 19%Production, 31%
Handling and storage, 17%
Handling and storage, 33%
Processing and packaging, 4%
Processing and packaging, 4%
Distribution and Market, 9%
Distribution and Market, 16%Consumption, 52%
Consumption, 16%
Developed countries Developing countries
Chart Title
Food loss and waste occur in different stages of the supply chain in developed and developing countries.
Share of total food available that is lost or wasted
0.81 (quad. kcal) 0.68 (quad. kcal)
© 2016 Danie Schoeman & Company.
Food loss is a supply chain issue
17 17 23 23 28 32 39623 12
2122
3737
9
2 54
6
47
7
11 9
1817
1513
6146 52
34 2813 5
North Americaand Oceania
IndustrializedAsia
Europe North Africa,West and
Central Asia
Latin America South andSoutheast Asia
Sub-SaharanAfrica
Chart Title
Production Handling and Storage Processing Distribution and Market Consumption
World Resources Institute: Reducing Food Loss and Waste, 2013
42%
Food Lost or Wasted By Region and Stage in Value Chain, 2009(Percent of kcal lost and wasted)
25% 22% 19% 15% 17% 23%
Share of total food available that is lost or wasted
Food loss and waste can be curbed by improved supply chain practices and collaboration.
© 2016 Danie Schoeman & Company.
A case study: Kenyan avocados
WEF: Enabling Trade - From Farm to Fork, 2014
Domesticmarket
Exports Transport PackagingTransport to
portSea shipment
to Europe
Transport
Total
Consumption
Distribution Consumption
Distribution
~5-6% loss• Avocados falling over • First layers of
avocados sun-exposed
~1-5% loss• Overripe avocados• Avocados losing weight
Limited
~10% rejectionsQuality check for European standards
Total
The Kenyan avocado supply chain – as it is structured today for exports to Europe –still suffers from around 15% food loss at the different stages of the avocado journey from farm to importer.
13-18%
N/A
Rej
ecte
d a
voca
do
s ar
e re
dir
ecte
d t
o
loca
l mar
kets
Harvesting
~7% loss• Manual harvesting
(e.g. avocados falling on the ground)
Collaborate or perish
© 2016 Danie Schoeman & Company.
Collaboration is critical for future success
Farmers
Transporters
Processors
Transporters
Exporters
Shippers
Retailers
Consumers
Both vertical and horizontal collaboration within the supply chain are important.
Horizontal Collaboration Vertical CollaborationWEF: Enabling Trade - From Farm to Fork, 2014
© 2016 Danie Schoeman & Company.
A framework for supply chain collaboration in the agri-food industry
Managing Trust
Supply Chain Collaboration
Managing Power
Designing & Governing SC Activities
Establishing & MaintainingSC Relationships
Managing Dependence
Sharing Risks
Selecting Partner(number of
entries)
Selecting Information
& DataSharing
Techniques &TechnologiesCollaboration
Width(SC activities)
CollaborationDepth
(Strategic, tactical,operational)
Sharing Rewards
Adapted from A. Matopoulos, M. Vlachopoulou, V. Manthou, B. Manos, (2007),"A conceptual framework for supply chain collaboration: empirical evidence from the agri-food industry", Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 12 Iss: 3 pp. 177 - 186
The 3PL agenda
© 2016 Danie Schoeman & Company.
3PLs - part of the solution
Shared DCs36%
DCs by channel
16%
Outsourced15%
Mix33%
How do you manage fulfilment by channel?
3.6%
9.2%
9.9%
9.9%
10.2%
13.5%
19.1%
20.1%
26.3%
26.3%
26.6%
31.3%
38.2%
Picking & waving logic
Long-term DC leases
Expedited delivery
Return management
Pick/Pack efficiency
Efficiency
Technology
Order management
Inventory control
Inventory accuracy
Inventory visibility
System integration
Order flexibility
What is your largest issue in fulfilling orders across multiple channels? (select top 3)
Retailers & shippers use a mix of solutions including 3PLs to manage fulfilment, but fulfilling orders across multiple channels creates certain issues.
2015 19th Annual Third-Party Logistics Study.
© 2016 Danie Schoeman & Company.
Providing the necessary infrastructure
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
90000
$1 billion in-storesales
$1 billion e-commerce sales
Logistics Space (square meters)
As e-commerce volumes grow due to omni-channel, so will the need for more logistics space further up the distribution chain
E-commerce users require 3x the logistics space, or more, as compared with brick-and-mortar
LEGACY Supply Chain Services: Keeping Up with the Retail Consumer - The Impact of E-Commerce on Retail Supply Chains.
© 2016 Danie Schoeman & Company.
But IT remains a problem
89%85%
91% 90% 92% 92% 92%88%
94% 93% 94%98% 96%
27%33%
4… 40%35%
42%37%
42%
54% 54% 53% 55%60%
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
IT Capabilities Necessary Element of 3PL Expertise
Shippers Satisfied with 3PL IT Capabilities
2015 19th Annual Third-Party Logistics Study.
The “IT Gap” exhibits continuing convergence, but it needs to close faster.
The
“IT
Gap
”
© 2016 Danie Schoeman & Company.
What are the three things you hope to achieve?
“Demosthenes, the greatest of Athenian orators, was asked what the three tests of a great speech were. “Action, action and action‟ was his reply.” James C. Humes
© 2016 Danie Schoeman & Company.
Danie Schoeman+27 82 940 [email protected]
There’s more to talk about, so let’s have coffee …
© 2016 Danie Schoeman & Company.
© 2016 Danie Schoeman & Company.
Disclaimer
This document has been prepared by Danie Schoeman and Companyto provide background information on the subjects mentioned herein,the forecasts, opinions and expectations are entirely those of DanieSchoeman and Company. This presentation was prepared with theutmost due care and consideration for accuracy and factualinformation; the forecasts, opinions and expectations are deemed tobe fair and reasonable. However there can be no assurance thatfuture results or events will be consistent with any such forecasts,opinions and expectations. Therefore the authors will not incur anyliability for any loss arising from any use of this presentation or itscontents or otherwise arising in connection herewith. Neither will thesources of information or any other related parties be held responsiblefor any form of action that is taken as a result of the proliferation ofthis document.