Frank McDonald, Jeremy Clegg, Martha O’Hagen Luff & Nicolas Li BAM SIG International Business and...
-
Upload
aleesha-ramsey -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of Frank McDonald, Jeremy Clegg, Martha O’Hagen Luff & Nicolas Li BAM SIG International Business and...
Symposium - Institutional Distance & Strategies of MNCs
1
Institutional Distance & Strategies of MNCs
Frank McDonald, Jeremy Clegg, Martha O’Hagen Luff & Nicolas Li
BAM SIG International Business and International Management BAM Annual Conference Belfast 2014
Symposium - Institutional Distance & Strategies of MNCs
2
BackgroundInternational Business (IB) and International
Management (IM) research often consider the same or similar topics, but the theories and methodologies underpinning research are often different
This work considers this issue using as an example an important contemporary issue - the importance of institutional distance for MNC strategies
This work was sponsored by Academy of International Business , UK and Ireland Chapter and the British Academy of Management, Special Interest Group in International Business and International Management.
Symposium - Institutional Distance & Strategies of MNCs
3
Major Theories of Institutional DistanceTwo major macro approaches to the theoretical underpinning of institutional distance1. Old institutional theory and Variants of
Capitalism (National Business Systems) 2. New institutional theoryNew institutional economics (North)New institutional sociology (DiMaggio and
Powell)3. Scott’s Three pillars – Regulative,
Normative and Cognitive
Symposium - Institutional Distance & Strategies of MNCs
4
Old Institutional TheoryOld institutional theories tend to focus on how
formal institutional systems interact with economic forces to determine the ways economic transactions take place and their outcomes
Institutions are seen as constraining and shaping the behaviour of economic agents
Little on the sociological underpinning of institutions
Little on the processes whereby institutional systems affect the economic transactions by the interaction between agents, organizations and institutions
Symposium - Institutional Distance & Strategies of MNCs
5
New Institutional TheoryNew institutional economics and sociology focuses
on how formal and informal institutions set the ‘rules of the game’ that largely determine the major characteristics of the ways economic transactions take place
New institutional economics (NIE) focuses on the affect of institutional systems on transaction costs and risk and the subsequent implications for the efficiency of outcomes
New Institutional Sociology (NIS) focuses on the process of how institutional systems affect the ways of conducting economic transactions by interactions between agents, organizations and institutions – tend to have less emphasis on the efficiency of outcomes than NIE
Symposium - Institutional Distance & Strategies of MNCs
6
Concepts of Institutional DistanceHistory of institutional distance – ‘psychic distance’ (Johnasen
and Vahlne, 1977) – ‘cultural distance’ (Hofstede – Kogut and Singh, 1988) – problems of not including key institutional factors - also affected by the rise of NIE and NIS
Scott provides a synthesis of NIE and NIS – the framework is based on three pillars – leads to measures of institutional distance based on three pillars – regulative, cognitive and normative
In IB research tends to focus on institutional distance and consequent problem of liability of foreignness (Zaheer, 1995) and implications for MNC strategies particular entry mode options
In IM research less clear cut focus on conceptual ideas of institutional distance more centred on understanding working of organizational structures and management of issues arising from institutional/cultural distance
Symposium - Institutional Distance & Strategies of MNCs
7
ApproachAn analysis of papers published (in the last five years) in
world elite journals in the areas of general management, strategy and organizational studies plus all IB/IM journals 3* and above and Journal of International Management
Identify key theoretical and methodological approaches used in papers in the studies involving institutional distance and MNC strategies
A classification of these papers into those with primarily an IB approach and those with an IM approach
Using these classification the key characteristics of IB and IM research approaches are considered to indicate commonalities and differences and to explore how an improved interface between IB and IM might improve our understanding in this area
Symposium - Institutional Distance & Strategies of MNCs
8
IB and IM PapersThe following type of focus in the papers determine if it was defined as IB or IM International Business focus eg FDI
issues, foreign trade issues, entry mode, & internationalization processes issues (50 papers)
International Management focus eg cross cultural management issues, international HRM, organizational factors in MNCs, & HQ – subsidiary relationships (22 papers)
Symposium - Institutional Distance & Strategies of MNCs
9
Distribution of PapersJournal
No. ofPapers
AMR 2
AMJ 1
ASQ 1
SMJ 8
OS 0
JIBS 18
IBR 16
MIR 11
JIM 11
JWB 4
Gen Man
Strategy
JIBSIB/IM
% of Papers
Symposium - Institutional Distance & Strategies of MNCs
10
Distribution of IB & IM PapersApproximately 70% of papers were focused on IB
issuesOnly Journal of International Management had
majority of papers in IM (64%) General Management journals had a 50-50 split JIBS, MIR and SMJ were approximately 70% IBIBR (81%) and JWB (100%) IB
The distribution of the type of journals and the focus of the papers indicates that work on Institutional Distance is primarily centred on IB types of study
Symposium - Institutional Distance & Strategies of MNCs
11
Use of TheoryFour broad theoretical approaches were used-NIE – based on approaches influenced by work
of North and WilliamsonNIS – based largely on approaches influenced
by work of DiMaggio and PowellScott’s three pillars approach Miscellaneous approach based on a multitude
of variations of combinations of NIE, NIS and Scott, plus many other approaches and combinations of approaches
NB Many of the papers had no clear theoretical foundation
Symposium - Institutional Distance & Strategies of MNCs
12
Distribution of Theory in PapersThe most commonly used theoretical
approach was the miscellaneous approach (approx 49%)
Second most used was Scott’s three pillars approach (approx 25%)
NIE (approx 17 %) and NIS (approx 9%) Most common theoretical approach in IB
papers was a tie (Scott’s three pillars and the miscellaneous approach)
Most common approach in IM papers was the miscellaneous approach
Symposium - Institutional Distance & Strategies of MNCs
13
Distribution of Theory in PapersThe IB/IM journals had a larger proportion of
papers using the miscellaneous approach Scott’s three pillar approach was most commonly
used in papers in SMJ and JIBSIBR, JWB and JIM papers were nearly exclusively
based on a miscellaneous approach
It seems that the theoretical basis for most papers is based on a rather ad hoc approach – this is the case for both IB and IM papers
Only AMJ, AMR & SMJ had no papers based on the miscellaneous approach and of these only the SMJ had more than 2 papers
Symposium - Institutional Distance & Strategies of MNCs
14
Methodologies Approx 76% of studies were quantitative with
approx 12% for both qualitative and conceptual studies
Conceptual papers appeared mainly in IBR and MIR, with one in JIBS and two in AMR (all AMR papers are conceptual)
Qualitative papers in all journals except SMJ, AMJ and ASQ (but very few papers on institutional distance in these journals)
Most qualitative studies had no firm theoretical basis
Techniques used in quantitative papers varied but cutting edge techniques were rare and mainly in ASQ, AMJ, SMJ and JIBS
Symposium - Institutional Distance & Strategies of MNCs
15
Methodologies Quantitative data was mainly from either small
scale surveys - or more often large public or commercial data bases
Variables for measuring institutional factors often from published indices Kogut and Singh index, World Bank measures, Transparency International, Hofstede’s indices, WEF indices
Most of the conceptual papers were on minor issues rather than issues such as developing conceptual models to apply contemporary social science theories such as those in NIE and NIS to business and management issues – or to develop understanding on interaction processes between institutions, organizations and agents
Symposium - Institutional Distance & Strategies of MNCs
16
Methodologies Very few papers on conceptual/theoretical
development are being publishedThe conceptual and qualitative work that is
published is not centred on issues such as applying social science theories on matters such as the evolution of institutional systems, the relative importance of formal and informal institutional systems, the role of power in institutional systems etc
Very little qualitative work is going even in IM studies
Cutting edge quantitative techniques are not commonly used in both IB and IM studies
Symposium - Institutional Distance & Strategies of MNCs
17
Commonalties Both IB and IM tend to use a miscellaneous
theoretical approach – or Scott’s three pillars approach
No concentred use of NIE or NIS other than Scott’s synthesis
Very little theory building or conceptual framework construction in both IB and IM
No clear movement to use social science literature on institutional systems, eg interaction between formal and informal institutions and organizations and agents to develop understanding on how differences in institutional systems affects processes connected to IB and IM
Symposium - Institutional Distance & Strategies of MNCs
18
Commonalties
No focus on work to understand how the evolution of institutional systems affects IB and IM activities, or on how these activities effect the evolution of institutional systems
No focus on how best to measure institutional factors – in IB and much of IM heavy reliance on published indices – with little effort to justify why these measures are a good proxies for measuring institutional distance
Symposium - Institutional Distance & Strategies of MNCs
19
DifferencesIB more focused on institutional distance and
more likely to have some sort of theoretical and conceptual underpinning – more centred on outcomes – less interested in processes
IM more centred on understanding processes and linkages – but lack coherent theory building from this work – little on outcomes
Both IB and IM not centred on cutting edge empirical techniques – perhaps a major issue especially for quantitative work – but IB tends to be more static and linear in its approach to empirical work
Symposium - Institutional Distance & Strategies of MNCs
20
A Way Forward?Establishing stronger theoretical foundations –
based on state of the art social science theories on institutions – including evolution of systems
Greater integration between IB and IM to develop understanding on how institutional distance affects IB factors such as Trade FDI, internationalization processes, entry modes etc and how this then affects IM issues such as organizational systems and management practices (and vice versa)
Improved understanding on how institutional systems interact with agents (foreign and indigenous) and organizations (foreign and indigenous) and how institutional distance affects this
Symposium - Institutional Distance & Strategies of MNCs
21
A Way Forward?Using the results of outputs from greater
integration between IB and IM in this area to theory build – thereby providing a stronger and more coherent theoretical and conceptual base from which to expand our understanding to develop useful policy and managerial implications
From the results of theory building develop more robust and well formulated arguments for how to measure institutional variables
Apply cutting edge techniques to empirical examinations and hypotheses testing.