Fraction at Ion of Phosphate in Marine Aquaculture Sediments

download Fraction at Ion of Phosphate in Marine Aquaculture Sediments

of 12

Transcript of Fraction at Ion of Phosphate in Marine Aquaculture Sediments

  • 8/6/2019 Fraction at Ion of Phosphate in Marine Aquaculture Sediments

    1/12

    Fractionation of phosphate in marine aquaculture

    sediments: optimization of the

    ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid method and

    comparison with other procedures

    Jawad Kassila & Jerome Hussenot

    Centre de Recherche sur les Ecosyste' mes Marins et Aquacoles (CN RS-Ifremer), LHoumeau, France

    Correspondence and present address: J Kassila, 376 Avenue Mohamed V, 23000 Beni Mellal, Morocco. E-mail: kassilajawad@

    yahoo.com

    Abstract

    The ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) method

    was compared with two other P-fractionation meth-

    ods, Sedex and Hieltjes & Lijklema (H. & L.), in order to

    choose a suitable method that extracts better the in-

    organic (inorg-P) and organic (org-P) phosphate f rom

    marine aquaculture sediments. The EDTA method

    gave reliable results and did not change the P-composi-

    tion of the sediments during the analysis. The Sedex

    method can be improved if the quantity of pre-ex-

    tracted org-P is separately determined after digestion,

    andthe org-P cantherebycorrected.The Sedex meth-od underestimates the org-P present in the sediments

    (59%), whereas the calcium-bound phosphate

    (CaCO3%P) is overestimated (117%) in comparison

    with the EDTA method. The NaOH and HCl used in

    H. & L.methodare not specic toextract inorg-Pfrom

    the sediments. To provide optimal extractions of in-

    org-P in muddy sediments containing 1% org-C and

    15% CaCO3, the EDTA method was optimizedaccord-

    ing to extraction times, dithionite concentration and

    solute/solid ratio. Five extractions of 2-h duration

    each with Ca-EDTA are required to extract more than

    95% of the iron-bound phosphate (Fe(OOH)%P)

    while the extraction of CaCO3%P with Na-EDTA

    takes more than 96 h.The concentration of dithionite

    up to1% did not inuence the amount of P and Fe ex-

    tracted (P50.098 and 0.174 respectively), whereas a

    solute/solid ratio of 40:1 was best suitable for the

    optimal extraction of Fe(OOH)%P. These conditions

    can be applied to analyse P composition of other

    marine pond sediments having similar texture and

    chemical composition.

    Keywords: P fractionation, EDTA, Sedex, phos-phate, ponds, marine

    Introduction

    Phosphate is often the limiting nutrient for phyto-

    plankton productivity in aquaculture ponds (Boyd

    1990). Their sediments strongly adsorb the phos-

    phate produced by the sh culture and large quant-

    ities of P fertilizer must therefore be added to support

    micro-algae production (Boyd 1995). Masuda andBoyd (1994) found about 67% of phosphate applied

    to freshwater ponds in feed accumulates in bottom

    soils. By a decrease in pH during the mineralization

    of organic matter, the o-P can be released from sedi-

    ments particularly from calcium-bound phosphate

    (CaCO3%P) (Staudinger, Peier, Avnimeleck & Ber-

    man 1990; Kassila, Hasnaoui, Droussi, Loudiki &

    Yahyaoui 2001). In order to optimize the addition of

    fertilizers in aquaculture ponds, it is necessary to un-

    derstand the P dynamics at the water^sediment in-

    terface. As the P fractions in sediment have dierent

    chemical and biological properties, for a better

    knowledge of the P cycle in aquaculture systems, it

    is essential to measure them separately. Fe(OOH)

    plays an important role in aquatic systems through

    their interaction with P (Torrent, Schwertmann &

    Barron 1994) and organic matter (Day, Hart, Mc Kel-

    vie & Beckett1994). The presence of CaCO3%P insedi-

    ment is essentially due to the precipitation of P with

    Ca21 as apatite. When sediment becomes anoxic, a

    decrease of pH will dissolve the apatite. Part of the

    Aquaculture Research, 2004, 35, 1339^1348 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2004.01157.x

    r 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd 1339

  • 8/6/2019 Fraction at Ion of Phosphate in Marine Aquaculture Sediments

    2/12

    released phosphate will be re-adsorbed onto Fe(OOH),

    which is also present in sediments (Golterman

    2001). Organic phosphate (org-P) has often been neg-

    lected and underestimated in sediment chemistry.

    Bstrom, Jansson and Forsberg (1982) presented an

    idealized distribution of Psed fractions in which org-P was estimated at approximately16%. Dierent stud-

    ies have shown after the presence of large quantities

    of org-P, accounting for more than 50% of total phos-

    phate (Tot-P) (De Groot & Fabre 1993; Moutin, Picot,

    Ximenes & Bontoux 1993). In a recent study, Kassila

    (2003) estimated the pool of org-P at only 6% of

    Tot-P in freshwater aquaculture sediments.

    To understandthe P dynamics in aquaculture sedi-

    ments, it is critical to choose a sediment P-fractiona-

    tion procedure suitable for separating dierent P

    fractions. At present, there is no standard method

    for the extraction of the dierent P fractions in sedi-

    ments. A discussion has been started on the stand-

    ardization of the fractionation of sediment-bound

    inorganic phosphates (inorg-P) which consist of

    iron-bound P (Fe(OOH)%P) and CaCO3%P respect-

    ively. If the choice of extractants can be standardized,

    the extraction time and extractant/sediment ratio

    depend on the type of sediment and amount of P

    (Golterman 1996).

    Themain objectiveof this work was to compare the

    eciency of the three P-fractionation methods,

    ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) (Golterman

    1996), Hieltjes and Lijklema (1980) and Sedex (Rut-

    tenberg 1992), to extract inorg-P and org-P from shpond sediments. The suitable method was optimized

    according to dierent factors such as the extraction

    time, dithionite (reducing agent) concentration, sol-

    ute/solid ratio and type of sediment.

    Materials and methods

    The ponds of CREAA (Regional Centre for Aquacul-

    ture Experiments) are located on the French Atlantic

    coast (Oleron Island) and are used to evaluate new

    marine land-based integrated aquaculture systems

    and then they are transferred for commercial appli-

    cation (European Innovation Project GENESIS). The

    system is proposed as an alternative to open sea cage

    systems, for whichenvironmentalconcerns are likely

    to become an increasing constraint. The system con-

    sists of three components: Sea bass (Dicentrarchus

    Labrax L.) is the nuclear culture species. The euent

    from this rst compartment is treated by micro-algae

    ponds after a rapid settling. The grown algae are

    transferred to feed shellsh, which convert the low-

    value algal by product into a high-value commodity

    (Hussenot & Shpigel 2003).

    Sediments (0^0.5 cm) were collec ted in May 2003

    from the sh pond of CREAA with a core sampler.

    They contained about 16% ne sand, 67% silt, 17%clay, 15% CaCO3 and 1% org-C. Sediments were wet

    sieved through a mesh of 0.2-mm pore size to remove

    larger particlesand used for P fractionation in ve rep-

    licates. Within 24 h after collection, about 0.7^1.0 g

    was mixed with 20 mL of the extractants and used

    in EDTA, Sedex and Hieltjes & Lijklema (H. & L.)

    methods. Sequential extractions were carried out

    with the pellets that remained in the centrifuge tube.

    In each step, the extractions were repeated several

    times until the quantity of a particular form of P

    extracted was less than 5% of the amount extracted.

    In the EDTA procedure (Golterman 1996)

    Fe(OOH)%P is extracted with a mixed solution of

    0.5-M Ca-EDTA and dithionite, buered with TRIS.

    As dithionite decomposes auto-catalytically in H2O

    by the acidity produced, it must be dissolved in a buf-

    fer solution (Golterman & Booman1988). This extrac-

    tion was performed during 2 h at the same pH as

    found in the sediment (7.2). The supernatants were

    split into twoportions: onewas analysed for dissolved

    Fe and the other for P. Calcium-bound P (CaCO3%P)

    is extracted with 0.1-M Na-EDTA at pH 4.5 in order to

    reduce the extraction time. The EDTA method ex-

    tracts org-P in two steps, after the inorg-P extractions

    had been removed. The rst removes an acid solubleorganic fraction (org-P

    ! ac) with 0.5-M HCl and the

    second removes a fraction which is soluble in 2-M

    NaOH: org-P! alk. The residual organic P (ROP) was

    obtained after the digestion of the nal pellet with

    H2SO4/K2S2O8 at120 1C.

    The major steps of the two fractionation methods

    to be compared with the EDTA method are:

    (1) The Sedex method (Ruttenberg1992) uses MgCl2

    and citrate-dithionite-bicarbonate (CDB) to ex-

    tract soluble P and Fe(OOH)%P, respectively, at

    pH 7.2 as found in the sediments (Table 1). The

    pH is adjusted at sediment pH to reduce the

    dissolution of carbonates before the next step.

    The acetate buer and HCl are used to extract

    CaCO3%P in two steps. Organic phosphate is

    measured after heating the nal pellet at 550 1C

    followed byan extraction with1-M HCl.

    (2) The Hieltjes and Lijklema (1980) method consists

    of using 1-M NH4Cl, 0.1-M NaOH and 0.5-M HCl

    solutions to extract soluble P, Fe(OOH)%P

    and CaCO3%P respectively. The residual P is

    P fractionation of marine aquaculture sediments J Kassila & J Hussenot Aquaculture Research, 2004, 35, 1339^1348

    1340 r 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Aquaculture Research, 35, 1339^1348

  • 8/6/2019 Fraction at Ion of Phosphate in Marine Aquaculture Sediments

    3/12

    Table 1 P and Fe extractions with dierent methods of fractionation

    Extraction no.

    EDTA Sedex H. & L.

    MgCl2 NH4Cl

    Mean SD Mean SD

    Soluble P

    1st 13.1 1.1 8.1 1.4

    2nd 11.1 1.0 9.1 0.7

    3rd 11.8 0.8 7.6 1.0

    Sub-total 36.0 24.8

    Extraction no.

    Extractant

    Ca-EDTA CDB 0.1 M NaOH

    P Fe P Fe P Fe

    Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD

    Fe(OOH) % P

    1st 154 7.4 5.13 0.10 124 6.2 3.95 0.06 103 3.8 0.36 0.02

    2nd 41 1.3 1.80 0.05 56.5 2.7 3.00 0.05 17.5 0.8 0.07 0.013rd 11.9 7.6 0.85 0.03 23.1 3.6 2.89 0.09 9.5 2.7 0.06 0.01

    4th 15.1 2.0 0.59 0.02 5.1 2.0 0.52 0.11 4.3 0.8 0.08 0.02

    Sub-total 222 8.37 209 10.36 134 0.57

    (126.8 org-P)

    Extraction no.

    Extractant

    Na-EDTA Na-acetate 1.0 M HCl 0.5 M HCl

    Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD

    CaCO3 % P

    1st 143 7.7 27.8 11.5 219 10.1 266 12.3

    2nd 118 8.0 28.5 15.6 7.9 0.7 166 5.4

    3rd 45.7 15.3 80.1 33.1 3.1 1.3 31.5 5.6

    4th 49.6 9.9 52.4 17.7 0.6 1.4 22.9 1.2

    Sub-total 356 188 231 487

    (120.0 org-P)Total CaCO3 % P 356 419 487

    Inorg-P 578 628 621

    Extraction no.

    Extractant

    0.25 M H2SO4 Ashing1Ext.1M HCl 2 M NaOH

    Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD

    Org-P

    1st 43.5 7.3 47.4 3.4 29.9 3.5

    2nd 22.4 1.5 9.1 1.8

    3rd 7.9 0.1 2.3 0.7

    Sub-total 73.8 41.3

    Org-P 115.1 47.4

    Extractant

    H2SO41K2S2O8 1M NaOH

    Mean SD Mean SD

    Residual P

    27.9 1.4 39.0 2.0

    Total P 693 675 660

    Mean values of ve replicates and SD, P in mg g1d.w. and Fe in mg g1d.w.

    EDTA, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid; H. & L., Hieltjes & Lijklema; Fe(OOH) % P, iron-bound phosphate; CDB, citrate-dithionite-bicar-

    bonate; CaCO3 % P, calcium-bound phosphate; org-P, organic phos phate; inorg-P, inorganic phos phate; SD, standard deviation.

    Aquaculture Research, 2004, 35, 1339^1348 P fractionation of marine aquaculture sediments J Kassila & J Hussenot

    r 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Aquaculture Research, 35, 1339^1348 1341

  • 8/6/2019 Fraction at Ion of Phosphate in Marine Aquaculture Sediments

    4/12

    extracted from the nal pellet by using a strong

    alkali solution at 90 1C.

    P concentrations of the supernatants were deter-

    mined colorimetrically using the blue-molybdate

    method (Murphy & Riley 1962). Fe was determined

    after centrifugation and neutralization with o-phen-antroline using ascorbicacid as reductant (Golterman,

    Clymo & Ohnstad 1978). Ethylenediaminetetraacetic

    acid solutions have the disadvantage of interfering

    with the P and Fe determinations. For the P determi-

    nation, not more than 2 mL of 0.1-M EDTA can be

    used without interference (Golterman & Booman

    1988). The Fe-phenantroline colour develops slowly

    in the presence of EDTA, but not if 1mL of 2-M

    Na-acetate solution is added to the 50-mL nal

    volume (Golterman 1996).

    Optimization of EDTA method

    To optimize the EDTA method for the sediments of

    CREAA, dierent factors were tested as follows:

    Dierent extraction times were evaluated to ex-

    tract Fe(OOH)%P (1, 2 and 4 h), CaCO3%P (4, 8,

    16 and 24 h), org-P! ac (15 and 30 min) and org-

    P! alk (15 and 30 min).

    Under the suitable extraction time, dierent

    concentrations of dithionite (0.5%,1.0% and 2.0%)

    were applied to optimize the extraction of

    Fe(OOH)%P and Fe(OOH), bound to sediments.

    The dithionite was applied in dissolved and solid

    forms.

    To extract Fe(OOH)%P and Fe(OOH), dierent

    solute/solid ratios were also tested in this study.

    Statistical analysis

    The data from the three P-fractionation methods

    were compared using ANOVA. Po0.05 was judged to

    be indicative of a signicant dierence between the

    values.

    Results

    Comparison of dierent methods

    The loosely sorbed P extracted in three subsequent

    extractions represents only 5.5% and 3.8% of Tot-P

    in the Sedex and H. & L. procedures respectively

    (Table 1). The Ca-EDTA and CDB extracted more

    Fe(OOH)%P and Fe(OOH), than NaOH. No signicant

    dierence was found between Ca-EDTA and CDB for

    Fe(OOH)%P extraction (P50.370, ANOVA); the dier-

    ence was larger for Fe(OOH) (Po0.010). Even after

    three subsequent extractions with Ca-EDTA, more

    than 7% of Fe(OOH)%P and Fe(OOH) remained in

    the pellet. The mineralization of the supernatants de-

    monstrated that the extraction with 0.1-M NaOHextracts about 27 mg org-P g1d.w. after hydrolysis

    (Table 1).

    The amount of CaCO3%P extracted by the dier-

    ent methods ranged from 360 to 490 mg g1 (Table

    1). For the Sedex proce dure, this extraction is usually

    made intwo steps:the rstextractsautogenic carbon-

    ate ouroapatite plus biogenic apatite with acid Na-

    acetate, and the second extracts detrital apatite with

    HCl. The results show that the second fraction rep-

    resents 55% of the total CaCO3%P extracted. More

    than four subsequent extractions with Na-EDTA are

    needed to extract eciently the CaCO3%P present in

    the sediments, whereas only three extractions with

    0.5-M HCl yielded over 95% of this fraction. No signi-

    cant dierence was found between the amount of

    the inorg-P extracted using the Sedex and H. & L.

    procedures.

    The org-P was better extracted using the EDTA

    procedure in two steps. The org-P! ac represents

    64% of the total org-P extracted. The Sedex method

    extracted only 47.4 mg g1 after the mineralization.

    The org-P represents 17% of Tot-P when extracted

    with the EDTA procedure, but it is only 7% with the

    Sedex procedure. The P remaining in the nal pellet

    as residual phosphate wasunder 40mg g1

    inall pro-cedures. The Tot-P extracted using dierent proced-

    ures was between 660 and 693 mg g1d.w.

    Optimization of the EDTA method

    During the rst extraction, about 56% of

    Fe(OOH)%P was removed during 1-, 2- and 4-h ex-

    traction (Fig. 1a). The amount of P extracted after six

    subsequent extractions was not signicantly dier-

    ent for the three extraction times (P40.070). The

    rst extractions remove between 50% and 60% of

    Fe(OOH) (Fig. 1b). No signicant dierence between

    2- and 4-h extractions was found (P50.650). More

    than four subsequent extractions were required to

    remove up to 95% of Fe(OOH)%P and Fe(OOH).

    The concentration of CaCO3%P extracted after

    four subsequent extractions still increased with time

    (Fig. 1c). The extraction yield was highest during the

    rst extraction. The amount of P extracted during

    24 h tended to stabilize after the third extraction.

    The amounts of org-P extracted after 15 or 30 min of

    P fractionation of marine aquaculture sediments J Kassila & J Hussenot Aquaculture Research, 2004, 35, 1339^1348

    1342 r 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Aquaculture Research, 35, 1339^1348

  • 8/6/2019 Fraction at Ion of Phosphate in Marine Aquaculture Sediments

    5/12

    shaking was not signicantly dierent (P50.066 for

    org-P! ac and P50.144 for org-P! alk) (Fig.1d).

    The treatment with 0.5% of dithionite was less e-

    cient to extract both Fe(OOH)%P and Fe(OOH) (Fig.

    2a and b). Only 20% of Fe(OOH) was removed in

    comparison with the amount extracted with 2% of

    dithionite. Furthermore, no signicant dierence

    was found between the treatments of 1% and

    2% (P50.314 for Fe(OOH)%P and P50.061 for

    Fe(OOH)). The concentration of dithionite (41.0%)

    did not inuence the concentration of soluble P

    and Fe.

    Both Fe(OOH)%P and Fe(OOH) were better re-

    duced with the dithionite in solid form (Fig. 3a

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7

    Number of total extractions

    gP/gd.w

    .

    1 h

    2 h

    4 h

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7

    Number of total extractions

    mgFe/gd

    .w.

    1 h

    2 h

    4 h

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    0 1 2 3 4 5

    Number of total extractions

    gP/gd.w.

    4 H

    8 H

    16 H

    24 H

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    0 1 2 3 4

    Number of total extractions

    gP/gd.w. 15 min

    30 min

    (e)

    (c) (d)

    (a) (b)

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    0 1 2 3 4

    Number of total extractions

    gP/gd.w.

    15 min

    30 min

    Figure 1 Extraction of Fe(OOH)%P (a), Fe(OOH) (b), CaCO3%P (c), org-P! ac (d) and org-P! alk (e) during dierent

    extraction times. Mean values of ve replicates.

    Aquaculture Research, 2004, 35, 1339^1348 P fractionation of marine aquaculture sediments J Kassila & J Hussenot

    r 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Aquaculture Research, 35, 1339^1348 1343

  • 8/6/2019 Fraction at Ion of Phosphate in Marine Aquaculture Sediments

    6/12

    and b). ANOVA showed a statistically signicant dier-

    ence between the two treatments (P50.0025 forFe(OOH)%Pand P50.0001 for Fe(OOH)).

    Using 20:0.75 and 20:1.0 as solute/solid ratios, less

    P and Fe were solubilized during the extraction with

    Ca-EDTA (Fig.4a and b). More thanof 28% and13% of

    P and Fe, respectively, were additionally extracted

    when 20:0.5 as ratio was used. The solute/solid ratio

    was found to have an inuence on the solubilized P

    and Fe.

    We have checked the eciency of EDTA method to

    extract Pand Fe from the other sediments collected in

    the sedimentation and micro-algae ponds. More

    than 600 mg P g1d.w. of Fe(OOH)%P was extracted

    from the algae pond sediments (Fig. 5a). Five extrac-

    tions are sucient to give the complete extraction of

    Fe(OOH)%P and Fe(OOH) in the sh- and sedimenta-

    tion-pond sediments. However, an additional applica-

    tion must be applied to give a suitable extraction of

    Fe(OOH)%P from the micro-algae sediments. Five

    extractions were required to extract eciently

    CaCO3%P. At the last extraction, less than 6% of

    CaCO3%P was removed from the dierent sediments

    (Fig. 5c). The org-P! ac was largely solubilized at the

    rst extraction in all sediments. Negligible quantities

    of P were found in the supernatants after three

    extractions.

    Discussion

    Comparison of dierent methods

    The loosely sorbed P, which was extracted with

    MgCl2 and NH4Cl at constant rate during three sub-

    sequent extractions came probably from the intersti-

    tial P. The neutral pH of the extractions prevents the

    dissolution of CaCO3%P. The Ca-EDTA/CDB solu-

    tions have therefore an advantage over NaOH to

    remove both Fe(OOH) and Fe(OOH)P with optimal

    eciency. Extractions with 0.1-M NaOH yielded

    much lower quantities of Fe(OOH)%P. This observa-

    tion is in agreement with the results reported by De

    Groot and Golterman (1990), Salvia-Castelvi, Scholer

    and Homann (2002). The mineralization of the

    supernatant indicates that NaOH extract some org-P

    present in sediment as well (Table 1). The results of

    Golterman and Booman (1988) have also shown that

    NaOH is not an accurate extractant as both the

    concentration of NaOH and the duration of the

    Figure 2 Extraction of Fe(OOH)%P (a) and Fe(OOH) (b)

    with dierentconcentrations of dithionite (0.5%,1.0% and

    2.0%). Mean values of ve replicates.

    Figure 3 Resultsof theextractionof Fe(OOH)%P (a) and

    Fe(OOH) (b) with two forms of dithionite (dissolved, D.D.;

    solid, S.D.). Mean values of ve replicates.

    P fractionation of marine aquaculture sediments J Kassila & J Hussenot Aquaculture Research, 2004, 35, 1339^1348

    1344 r 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Aquaculture Research, 35, 1339^1348

  • 8/6/2019 Fraction at Ion of Phosphate in Marine Aquaculture Sediments

    7/12

    extraction have an inuence on the quantity of phos-

    phate extracted, due to the hydrolysis of org-P. The ex-traction with NaOH does not only extract Fe(OOH)

    %P but phytate phosphate as well (Jackman & Black

    1951; Golterman, Paing, Se rrano & Gomez 1998). It is

    considered an advantage of the H. & L. that only

    one extraction with NaOH is needed to extract all

    Fe(OOH)%P. Repeating the treatment, however, we

    found that following extractions extracted 30% of

    the rst.

    The amount of CaCO3%P extracted using dierent

    methods is low in comparison with the results re-

    ported by Kassila (2003) in freshwater pond sedi-

    ments. The increase in pH during the extraction of

    Fe(OOH)%P with NaOH favoured a back precipita-

    tion of P extracted from this fraction onto CaCO3%P.

    This re-adsorption is rarely taken into account and

    explains the large quantity of CaCO3%P extracted

    using the H. & L. procedure. The Sedex extraction

    yielded results similar to that of the EDTA method

    for Fe(OOH)%P, but extrac ted more CaCO3%P. Prob-

    ably that this overestimation is caused by the hydro-

    lysis of org-P! ac with 1-M HCl. This assumption can

    be accepted as the sum of CaCO3%P and org-P! ac

    extracted using the EDTA method was not dierent

    from the total CaCO3%P extracted using the Sedex

    method. Moreover, mineralization of supernatant dem-

    onstrated that about 20 mg g1 came from the org-P

    (Table 1). overestimation of CaCO3%P in H. & L.comes from neglecting org-P extraction in fractiona-

    tion steps. Na-EDTA solution gave an optimal extrac-

    tion of CaCO3%P and needed a longer extraction

    time in comparison with solutions used in Sedex

    and H. & L. methods.

    Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid method extracts

    a large quantity of org-P as org-P! ac. Polyphos-

    phates, if present, may represent the major part of

    the org-P! ac while phytate P and humic-bound P

    dominates the composition of org-P! alk (Golterman

    & De Groot 1994). Sedex method underestimated org-

    P; a large part may be extracted during inorg-P

    extractions. Extraction of detrital apatite with HCl

    causes a loss of 17% of org-P before the mineraliza-

    tion step. Residual P, less than 40mg g1 in all meth-

    ods, did not give any indication about extraction

    methods, as all experimental errors accumulate in

    this fraction.

    Optimization of the EDTA method

    One-hour extractions were less ecient to extract

    both Fe(OOH) and Fe(OOH)%P even after six extrac-

    tions. The highest extraction eciency was obtained

    using ve sequential extractions of 2-hduration each.Except for 24 h,all extractiontimes appliedto sedi-

    ments were not sucient to give a suitable extraction

    of CaCO3%P. One single extraction can never give a

    suitable recovery. Four extractions of 24-h duration

    each are recommended to assess most of CaCO3%P

    (495%) present in the sediments. For the organic

    fraction, three subsequent extractions were required

    to extract most of org-P! ac (495%), whereas only

    two extractions were enough to remove org-P! alk.

    Treatmentwith 0.5% of dithionitewas less ecient

    to extract both Fe(OOH)%P and Fe(OOH) and was

    hence omitted. Inuence of dithionite was larger on

    Fe extractability than on P extractability. Free

    Fe(OOH) seems to be easily reduced in comparison

    with Fe(OOH)%P complex. This observation was in

    agreement with Golterman (1984) who argued that

    the high stability of Fe(OOH)%P complex protects it

    against reduction. Five extractions of 2-h duration

    each and 1% of dithionite will be applied to the sedi-

    ments of CREAA to give an optimal extraction of

    Fe(OOH)%P and Fe(OOH).

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    700

    800

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7

    Number of total extractions

    gP/gd.w.

    20:0.5

    20:0.75

    20:1.0

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7

    Number of total extractions

    mgFe/g

    d.w.

    20:0.5

    20:0.75

    20:1.0

    (a)

    (b)

    Figure 4 Extraction of Fe(OOH)%P (a) and Fe(OOH) (b)

    with dierent extractant/sediment ratios. Mean values of

    ve replicates.

    Aquaculture Research, 2004, 35, 1339^1348 P fractionation of marine aquaculture sediments J Kassila & J Hussenot

    r 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Aquaculture Research, 35, 1339^1348 1345

  • 8/6/2019 Fraction at Ion of Phosphate in Marine Aquaculture Sediments

    8/12

    Use of dithionite in solid form to extract

    Fe(OOH)%P and Fe(OOH) is more ecient than

    in dissolved form, as dithionite decomposes rapidly

    in H2O bythe acidity produced(Golterman & Booman

    1988). Even in the dry state, e.g., in pots that are

    often opened, dithionite deteriorates slowly. Golterman

    (1996) suggested to check their activity regularly

    using an Fe(OOH) suspension.

    Only the 20:0.5 ratio can give a suitable extraction

    of Fe(OOH)%P and Fe(OOH). Golterman and Boo-

    man (1988) have found that the concentration of

    dithionite inuenced the quantity of P solubilized if

    2000mg of sediment was used, but not if 500 mg

    was used. Consequently, more dithionite (41%) is

    needed when more than 500 mg of sediment is used

    as in 20:0.75 and 20:1 ratios. The eect of dierent

    concentrations of dithionite must be tested to see

    whether an extraction will yield some extra P and Fe.

    The P fertilizer added (H3PO4, 5 mM) in the

    micro-algae pond increased the concentration of

    Fe(OOH)%P in sediments. Six extractions are

    sucient to give the complete extraction of

    Fe(OOH)%P and Fe(OOH). The Fe(OOH)%P removed

    from the micro-algae sediments seems to be not pro-

    portional to Fe(OOH). This result led to consider that

    P was not bounded to Fe(OOH) but s imply adsorbed

    on sediment particles and dead cell algae. To avoid

    this confusion in future studies, it is necessary to be-

    gin the P fractionation with an extraction of loosely

    sorbed Pas in Sedex or H. & L. methods.

    Less precipitation of P with apatite occurred in the

    sedimentation pond while the relatively higher val-

    ues of pH ($ 8.4) enhanced probably this precipita-

    tion in the micro-algae ponds. The phosphates that

    may constitute a fraction of org-P! ac in sediment

    (Golterman etal. 1998) were largely solubiliz ed at the

    rst extraction in all sediments. The amount of

    org-P! ac removed in the sh pond sediments was in

    agreement with the results reported by Kassila

    (2003) in an earthen sh pond in Morocco.

    In conclusion, the EDTA method is more suit-

    able than the Sedex and H. & L. methods for P

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    700

    800

    1 2 3 4 5 6

    Number of total extractions

    gP/gd.w.

    M. pondS. pond

    F. pond

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    1 2 3 4 5 6

    Number of total extractions

    mgFe/gd.w.

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    700

    800

    1 2 3 4 5 6

    Number of total extractions

    gP/gd.w.

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120140

    160

    180

    200

    1 2 3 4 5 6Number of total extractions

    gP/gd.w.

    (a) (b)

    (d)(c)

    M. pond

    S. pond

    F. pond

    M. pond

    S. pond

    F. pond

    M. pond

    S. pond

    F. pond

    Figure 5 Extraction of Fe(OOH)%P (a), Fe(OOH) (b), CaCO3%P (c) and org-P! ac (d) from the sh (F.), sedimentation (S.)

    and micro-algae (M.) pond sediments. Mean values of ve replicates.

    P fractionation of marine aquaculture sediments J Kassila & J Hussenot Aquaculture Research, 2004, 35, 1339^1348

    1346 r 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Aquaculture Research, 35, 1339^1348

  • 8/6/2019 Fraction at Ion of Phosphate in Marine Aquaculture Sediments

    9/12

    fractionation of the aquaculture sediments. To apply

    this method, it is necessary to extract before the

    loosely sorbed P to avoid confusion with Fe(OOH)

    %P. The EDTA solutions have a disadvantage i.e. the

    longer extraction time in comparison with the solu-

    tions used in Sedex and H. & L. methods. A P fractio-

    nation scheme may be recommended as in Fig. 6 for

    marine pond sediments having similar characteris-

    tics like the sediments of CREAA.

    Conclusion

    The overall results show that the EDTA method de-

    veloped by Golterman (1996) for brackish marshes is

    also suitable for marine aquaculture ponds. This

    method allows the identication of changes in the P

    fractions due to seasonal variations in freshwater

    systems (Moutin etal. 1993). Using the Sedex method,

    only the rst step with CDB can be applied to extract

    both Fe(OOH)%P and Fe(OOH). The extractants used

    to remove CaCO3%P disturb the org-P. The Sedex

    method can be improved if the quantity of pre-ex-

    tracted org-P is separately determined after digestion,

    and the org-P can thereby be corrected. The EDTA

    method provides optimal extractions and results in

    the most meaningful interpretation if it is optimized

    for a particular sediment. The optimal conditions for

    P fractionation obtained in this study are general-

    ly similar with those recommended by Golterman

    (1996) for calcareous sediments in brackish water sys-

    tems.These conditions canbe appliedto analyse theP

    composition in other marine pond sediments having

    both similar texture and chemical composition.

    Acknowledgments

    The authors acknowledge the nancial help of Con-

    seil regional de Poitou-Charentes, Ifremer and the

    European Community (Genesis Innovation Project).

    We would like to thank Dr M. Laima for critical

    remarks and English correction.

    Sediment (20:0.5 as solute/solid ratio)

    3 extractions of 2 h with 1 M Loosely-sorbed P

    MgCl2

    Pellet 1

    5 extractions of 2 h with 0.5 M Fe(OOH) PCa-EDTA + 1 % of dithionite

    in solid form

    Pellet 2

    5 extractions of 24 h with 0.1 M CaCO3 P

    Na-EDTA

    Pellet 3

    3 extractions of 15 min with org-Pac

    0.25 M HCl

    Pellet 4

    2 extractions of 15 min with org-Palk

    2 M NaOH

    Final pellet

    Mineralization with H2SO

    4+ K

    2S

    2O

    8ROP

    Figure 6 Fractionation scheme proposed to extract dierent fractions of P from the sediments.

    Aquaculture Research, 2004, 35, 1339^1348 P fractionation of marine aquaculture sediments J Kassila & J Hussenot

    r 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Aquaculture Research, 35, 1339^1348 1347

  • 8/6/2019 Fraction at Ion of Phosphate in Marine Aquaculture Sediments

    10/12

    References

    Bstrom B., Jansson M. & Forsberg C. (1982) Phosphorus

    release from sediments. Archiv fur Hydrobiologie Beiheft

    Ergebnisse der Limnologie 18, 5^59.

    Boyd C.E. (1990) Water Quality in Ponds of Aquaculture. Ala-

    bama Agricultural Experiment Station, Auburn Univer-sity, Auburn, USA.

    Boyd C.E. (1995) Bottom Soils, Sediment, and Pond Aquacul-

    ture. Chapman & Hall, NewYork, USA,348pp.

    Day G.M., Hart B.T., Mc Kelvie I.D. & Beckett R. (1994) Ad-

    sorption of natural organic matter onto goethite. Colloids

    and Surfaces 89,1^13.

    De Groot C.J. & Fabre A. (1993) The impact of dessication of a

    freshwater marsh (Garcines Nord, Camargue, France) on

    sediment^water^vegetation interactions. Part 3: the frac-

    tional composition and the phosphate adsorption charac-

    teristics of the sediment. Hydrobiologia 252,105^116.

    De Groot C.J. & Golterman H.L. (1990) Se quential fractiona-

    tion of sediment phosphate. Hydrobiologia 192, 143^149.

    Golterman H.L. (1984) Sediments, modifying and equilibrat-

    ing factors in the chemistry of freshwaters.Verhandlungen

    der InternationalenVereinigung und Limnologie 22, 23^59.

    Golterman H.L. (1996) Fractionation of s ediment phos phate

    with chelating compounds: a simplication, and compar-

    ison with other methods sediment. In: Sediment^Water

    Interaction 6 (ed. by H.L. Golterman). Hydrobiologia 335,

    87^95.

    Golterman H.L. (2001) Phosphate release from anoxic sedi-

    ments or what did Mortimer really write?. Hydrobiologia

    450, 99^106.

    Golterman H.L. & Booman A. (1988) Sequential extraction

    of iron-phosphate and calcium-phosphate from sedi-

    ments by chelatings agents. Verhandlungen der Internatio-nalenVereinigung und Limnologie 23, 904^909.

    Golterman H.L. & De Groot C.J. (1994) Nouvelles connais-

    sances des formes du phosphate: consequences sur le

    cycle du phosphate dans les sediments des eaux douces

    peu profondes. Annals of Limnology 30, 221^232.

    Golterman H.L., Clymo R.S. & Ohnstad M.A.M. (1978) Meth-

    ods for Physical and Chemical Analysis of Freshwaters, IBP

    Manual No. 8, 2nd edn. Blackwell Scientic Publications,

    Oxford, UK,213pp.

    Golterman H.L., Paing J., Serrano L. & Gomez E. (1998) Pres-

    ence of and phosphate release from polyphosphates or

    phytate phosphate in lake sediments. In: Sediment^Water

    Interaction 8 (ed. by H.L. Golterman). Hydrobiologia 364,

    99^104.

    Hieltjes A.H.M. & Lijklema L. (1980) Fractionation of inor-

    ganic phosphates in calcareous sediments. Journal of

    Environmental Quality 9, 405^407.

    HussenotJ.M.E. & ShpigelM. (2003) Marine land-basedinteg-

    rated aquaculture systems for European countries and

    the European Innovation Project GENESIS. European

    Aquaculture Society 33, 31^36.

    Jackman R.H. & Black C.A. (1951) Solubility of iron, alumi-

    nium, calcium and magnesium inositol phosphates at

    dierent pH values. Soil Science 72, 261^266.

    KassilaJ. (2003) Eects of lining and drying on the chemical

    composition of sediments and inuence of organic car-

    bon on carp growth in aquaculture ponds. Aquaculture

    Research 34, 333^343.

    Kassila J., Hasnaoui M., Droussi M., Loudik i M. & Yahyaoui

    A. (2001) Relation betweenphosphate and organic matter

    inpondsediments of theDerouasheriesfarm(Beni-Mel-

    lal, Morocco): implications for pond management. Hydro-biologia 450, 57^70.

    Masuda K. & Boyd C.E. (1994) Phosphorus fractions in soil

    and water of aquaculture ponds built on clayey Ultisols

    at Auburn, A labama. Journal ofWorld Aquaculture Society

    25, 379^395.

    Moutin T., Picot B., Ximenes M.C. & Bontoux J. (1993) Sea-

    sonalvariations of P compounds and their concentrations

    in two coastal lagoons (Herault, France). Hydrobiologia

    252, 45^59.

    Murphy J. & RileyJ.P. (1962) A modiedsingle solution meth-

    od for the determination of phosphate in natural waters.

    Analytica Chimica Acta 27, 31^36.

    Ruttenberg K.C. (1992) Development of a sequential

    extraction method for dierent forms of phosphorus

    in marine sediments. Limnology and Oceanography 37,

    1460^1482.

    Salvia-CastelviM., Scholer C. & Homann L. (2002) Compar-

    aison de dierents protocoles de speciation sequentielle

    du phosphore dans des sediments de rivie' re. Revue des

    Sciences de lEau15, 223^233.

    Staudinger B., Peier S., Avnimeleck Y. & Berman T. (1990)

    Phosphorusmobility in the interstitial waters of sediments

    in lake Kinneret, Israel. Hydrobiologia 207,167^177.

    Torrent J., Schwertmann U. & Barron V. (1994) Phosphate

    sorption by natural hematites. European Journal of Soil

    Science 45, 45^51.

    P fractionation of marine aquaculture sediments J Kassila & J Hussenot Aquaculture Research, 2004, 35, 1339^1348

    1348 r 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Aquaculture Research, 35, 1339^1348

  • 8/6/2019 Fraction at Ion of Phosphate in Marine Aquaculture Sediments

    11/12

  • 8/6/2019 Fraction at Ion of Phosphate in Marine Aquaculture Sediments

    12/12