FR1.L09.3 - SAR TOMOGRAPHIC FOCUSING BY COMPRESSIVE SAMPLING: EXPERIMENTS ON REAL DATA
Transcript of FR1.L09.3 - SAR TOMOGRAPHIC FOCUSING BY COMPRESSIVE SAMPLING: EXPERIMENTS ON REAL DATA
SAR TOMOGRAPHIC FOCUSING BY COMPRESSIVE SAMPLING: EXPERIMENTS ON REAL DATA
Università di Cassino Italy
Alessandra Alessandra Budillon Budillon
Gilda SchirinziGilda Schirinzi
IGARSS’10, Honolulu
Annarita Annarita EvangelistaEvangelista
Università di Napoli Parthenope Italy
IGARSS10, Honolulu July 25-30
Outline
Introduction Tomographic data model Compressive Sampling Tomography (CST) Height resolution enhancement Results on ERS-1/2 data Conclusions
IGARSS10, Honolulu July 25-30
Single-pass systems are not able to discriminate different scatterers lying in the same range-azimuth resolution cell and located at different elevations.
Multi-pass systems allow their discrimination, and the estimation of their reflectivity and height.
SAR Tomography
x
z
y
IGARSS10, Honolulu July 25-30
CST processing goals Compensation of the effects due to non-inform orbits
spacing.
Reduction of the number of acquisitions required to
achieve a given elevation resolution.
Increase of the elevation resolution achievable with a
given overall orthogonal baseline extent.
IGARSS10, Honolulu July 25-30
Tomographic Data Model
z
s
s’
P1
P2
P3
P4
P5
r
S1
ST
y
AB
C
r
S1 elevation extent of the sceneST overall baseline extentPi i-th orbit position(s) reflectivity functionR0 distance between the center of
the scene and the antennas ground elevations’ in-orbit elevationr range resolution
€
u s'm( ) ≅ γ s( ) e− j
4π
λR0
s'm s
−S1 /2
S1 /2
∫ ds
with − ST /2 ≤ s'm ≤ ST /2
m =1,....., M
€
s =λR0
2ST
Elevation resolution
IGARSS10, Honolulu July 25-30
Discrete data acquisition model
Discretizing elevation s with step s/ with ≥
The problem is under-determined
A solution can be found using truncated SVD
€
u = Φγ
€
u = [u(1),.....,u(M )]T
γ = [γ(1),.....,γ(N)]T
Φ{ }kn=
1
Ne
− j2πηST
s'k n
M×1M×N
N×1
€
N = S1η ρ s⎣ ⎦
M<N
IGARSS10, Honolulu July 25-30
Compressive Sampling Tomography (CST)
Assume that there exist a basis in which s has a K-sparse representation:
with only K<N coefficients i different from zero.
Considering the discrete elevation values sn=ns/ we can write in vector form:
with a K-sparse vector
:
Abd
€
s( ) = α iψ i s( )i=1
N
∑
€
=Ψ
IGARSS10, Honolulu July 25-30
Compressive Sampling Tomography
€
ˆ α = arg min α1 subject to u = ΦΨα
A solution can be found by solving the linear progamming problem:
€
=Ψ
€
u = Φγ
The norm minimization has the role of enforcing sparsity.
€
l 1
Measurement Matrix Sparsity Matrix
IGARSS10, Honolulu July 25-30
Compressive Sampling Tomography
CS theory ensures that when it is satisfied an incoherency property between Φ and Ψ, it is indeed possible to recover with overwhelming probability the K largest αi from a number of measurements M satisfying the inequality :
where€
M ≥ C μ 2 Φ,Ψ( ) K N log N( )4
€
μ Φ,Ψ( ) = maxk , i
< ϕk ,ψi >
ϕk 2ψi 2
IGARSS10, Honolulu July 25-30
Compressive Sampling Tomography
A solution can be found by solving the linear progamming problem:
€
=Ψ
€
u = Φγ + w
Given N and K, for obtaining a reliable solution the parameters and have to satisfy the relations: €
ˆ α = arg min α1
+1
2εΦΨα − u
2
2
€
≤sup = expM
CK
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟1 4 ⎡
⎣ ⎢ ⎢
⎤
⎦ ⎥ ⎥
λR0
2S1ST
€
= 2 log Nσ W
IGARSS10, Honolulu July 25-30
Numerical results. Simulated data
ERS-1/2 parameters
Wavelength 0.0562 m
View angle 23°
Range distance R0 846 Km
Pulse bandwidth f 16 MHz
Range resolution r 9.37 m
Elevation resolution S 26.60 m
Height resolution z 10.39 m
S1 500 m
ST 893 m
z
s
s’
P1
P2
P3
P4
P5
r
S1
ST
y
AB
C
r
sA =-23.61 m
sB =0 m
sC =111.11 m
A:
B:
C:
AjAe
BjAe
CjAe
15 orbits 9 orbits
IGARSS10, Honolulu July 25-30
15 orbits 9 orbits
1
€
's =ρ s
η= 26.60 m
€
z = ρ 's sin(ϑ ) =10.39 m
---- SVD__ CS
Numerical results. Simulated data
€
For N = 9 and K = 3
→ η sup ≅ 3
IGARSS10, Honolulu July 25-30
15 orbits 9 orbits
€
=3
€
's =ρ s
η= 8.87 m
€
z = ρ 's sin(ϑ ) = 3.46 m
---- SVD__ CS
Numerical results. Simulated data
IGARSS10, Honolulu July 25-30
Numerical results. Simulated data
K=5
K=3K=4
€
=3
IGARSS10, Honolulu July 25-30
Stadium San Paolo (Naples –Italy)
290 m × 230 m
Height 35 m
Numerical results - Real data
IGARSS10, Honolulu July 25-30
IGARSS10, Honolulu July 25-30
CST TSVD TSVDCST
IGARSS10, Honolulu July 25-30
Conclusions
CST has proved to be very effective in reducing the number of acquisitions required for an accurate focusing in elevations.
It allows to noticeably improve the height resolutions attainable with a given overall orthogonal baseline span.
Results on ERS-1/2 data have showed the applicability of the method.
A wider experimentation on high resolution images is in progress.