FP815-190004/A FP815-190004 PW-$$EL-609-36657 …

64
1 1 RETURN BIDS TO: RETOURNER LES SOUMISSIONS À: Bid Receiving - PWGSC / Réception des soumissions - TPSGC 11 Laurier St., / 11, rue Laurier Place du Portage, Phase III Core 0B2 / Noyau 0B2 Gatineau Québec K1A 0S5 Bid Fax: (819) 997-9776 Title - Sujet (FSR) SAP Implementation Project Solicitation No. - N° de l'invitation FP815-190004/A Client Reference No. - N° de référence du client FP815-190004 File No. - N° de dossier 609el.FP815-190004 CCC No./N° CCC - FMS No./N° VME Time Zone Eastern Daylight Saving Time EDT LETTER OF INTEREST LETTRE D'INTÉRÊT F.O.B. - F.A.B. Plant-Usine: Destination: Other-Autre: Address Enquiries to: - Adresser toutes questions à: Bastien, Josée Telephone No. - N° de téléphone FAX No. - N° de FAX (613) 858-9843 ( ) ( ) - Destination - of Goods, Services, and Construction: Destination - des biens, services et construction: DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES AND OCEANS STN 9W051 200 KENT STREET OTTAWA Ontario K1A0M1 Canada Fuseau horaire Solicitation Closes - L'invitation prend fin at - à 02:00 PM 2019-07-31 on - le Issuing Office - Bureau de distribution Informatics Professional Services - EL Division/Services professionnels en informatique - division EL Terrasses de la Chaudière 4th Floo 10 Wellington Street Gatineau Québec K1A 0S5 Comments - Commentaires Vendor/Firm Name and Address Raison sociale et adresse du fournisseur/de l'entrepreneur GETS Ref. No. - N° de réf. de SEAG PW-$$EL-609-36657 Buyer Id - Id de l'acheteur 609el Date 2019-07-22 Delivery Required - Livraison exigée Delivery Offered - Livraison proposée Vendor/Firm Name and Address Signature Date Name and title of person authorized to sign on behalf of Vendor/Firm (type or print) Nom et titre de la personne autorisée à signer au nom du fournisseur/ de l'entrepreneur (taper ou écrire en caractères d'imprimerie) Instructions: Voir aux présentes Instructions: See Herein See Herein Raison sociale et adresse du fournisseur/de l'entrepreneur Telephone No. - N°de téléphone Facsimile No. - N° de télécopieur Page 1 of - de 1

Transcript of FP815-190004/A FP815-190004 PW-$$EL-609-36657 …

1 1

RETURN BIDS TO:RETOURNER LES SOUMISSIONS À:Bid Receiving - PWGSC / Réception des soumissions - TPSGC11 Laurier St., / 11, rue LaurierPlace du Portage, Phase IIICore 0B2 / Noyau 0B2GatineauQuébecK1A 0S5Bid Fax: (819) 997-9776

Title - Sujet(FSR) SAP Implementation Project

Solicitation No. - N° de l'invitation

FP815-190004/A

Client Reference No. - N° de référence du client

FP815-190004

File No. - N° de dossier

609el.FP815-190004CCC No./N° CCC - FMS No./N° VME

Time Zone

Eastern Daylight SavingTime EDT

LETTER OF INTERESTLETTRE D'INTÉRÊT

F.O.B. - F.A.B.

Plant-Usine: Destination: Other-Autre:

Address Enquiries to: - Adresser toutes questions à:

Bastien, Josée

Telephone No. - N° de téléphone FAX No. - N° de FAX

(613) 858-9843 ( ) ( ) -

Destination - of Goods, Services, and Construction:Destination - des biens, services et construction:

DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES AND OCEANSSTN 9W051200 KENT STREETOTTAWAOntarioK1A0M1Canada

Fuseau horaireSolicitation Closes - L'invitation prend finat - à 02:00 PM

2019-07-31on - le

Issuing Office - Bureau de distribution

Informatics Professional Services - EL Division/Services professionnels en informatique - division ELTerrasses de la Chaudière 4th Floo10 Wellington StreetGatineauQuébecK1A 0S5

Comments - Commentaires

Vendor/Firm Name and Address

Raison sociale et adresse du

fournisseur/de l'entrepreneur

GETS Ref. No. - N° de réf. de SEAG

PW-$$EL-609-36657

Buyer Id - Id de l'acheteur

609el

Date

2019-07-22

Delivery Required - Livraison exigée Delivery Offered - Livraison proposée

Vendor/Firm Name and Address

Signature Date

Name and title of person authorized to sign on behalf of Vendor/Firm

(type or print)

Nom et titre de la personne autorisée à signer au nom du fournisseur/de l'entrepreneur (taper ou écrire en caractères d'imprimerie)

Instructions: Voir aux présentes

Instructions: See Herein

See Herein

Raison sociale et adresse du fournisseur/de l'entrepreneur

Telephone No. - N°de téléphone

Facsimile No. - N° de télécopieur

Page 1 of - de 1

Request for Information No. – Am. No. - N° de la modif. Buyer ID - Id de l'acheteur N° de la demande d’information 609el FP815-190004/A

Page 1 of 63

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI)

TITLE: Financial Systems Renewal (FSR) – SAP Implementation Project 1. Purpose and Nature of the Request for Information (RFI)

Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) is requesting Industry feedback regarding a potential upcoming procurement for the implementation of an SAP Financials System. The intent of this RFI is to seek feedback from industry on the envisioned approach to evaluation. It is anticipated that the procurement will be leveraging the Solutions Based Informatics Professional Services (SBIPS) procurement vehicle. This RFI is neither a call for tender nor a Request for Proposal (RFP). No agreement or contract will be entered into based on this RFI. The issuance of this RFI is not to be considered in any way a commitment by the Government of Canada, nor as authority to potential respondents to undertake any work that could be charged to Canada. This RFI is not to be considered as a commitment to issue a subsequent solicitation or award contract(s) for the work described herein. Although the information collected may be provided as commercial-in-confidence (and, if identified as such, will be treated accordingly by Canada), Canada may use the information to assist in drafting elements of any potential future RFP or contract. Respondents are encouraged to identify, in the information they share with Canada, any information that they feel is proprietary, third party or personal information. Please note that Canada may be obligated by law (e.g. in response to a request under the Access of Information and Privacy Act) to disclose proprietary or commercially-sensitive information concerning a respondent (for more information: http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/a-1/). Participation in this RFI is encouraged but is not mandatory. There will be no short-listing of potential suppliers for the purposes of undertaking any future work as a result of this RFI. Similarly, participation in this RFI is not a condition or prerequisite for the participation in any potential subsequent solicitation. Respondents will not be reimbursed for any cost incurred by participating in this RFI. The RFI closing date published herein is not the deadline for comments or input. Comments and input will be accepted any time up to the time when/if a follow-on solicitation is published.

Request for Information No. – Am. No. - N° de la modif. Buyer ID - Id de l'acheteur N° de la demande d’information 609el FP815-190004/A

Page 2 of 63

2. Potential Work Scope and Constraints: The summary of work is detailed in Annex A. 3. Legislation, Trade Agreements, and Government Policies: The following is indicative of some of the legislation, trade agreements and government policies that could impact any follow-on solicitation(s):

I. Canada Free Trade Agreement (CFTA) II. The Comprehensive and Economic Trade Agreement (CETA)

III. North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) IV. World Trade Organization – Agreements on Government Procurement

(WTO-AGP) V. Federal Contractors Program for Employment Equity (FCP-EE)

4. Schedule:

In providing responses, the following expected schedule should be utilized as a baseline:

I. Request for Information (RFI) – July 2019 II. RFI submission review – August 2019

III. Solicitation for contract –August 2019 IV. Contract award – October 2019 V. SAP System go-live – April 2021

5. Important Notes to Respondents: Interested respondents may submit their responses to the PSPC Contracting Authority, identified below, preferably via email:

Josée Bastien Supply Team Leader Public Services and Procurement Canada Address: 10 Wellington Street, Gatineau, QC Telephone: 613-858-9843 E-mail: [email protected]

A point of contact for the Respondent should be included in the package.

Changes to this RFI may occur and will be advertised on the Government Electronic Tendering System. Canada asks Respondents to visit Buyandsell.gc.ca regularly to check for changes, if any.

Field Code Changed

Request for Information No. – Am. No. - N° de la modif. Buyer ID - Id de l'acheteur N° de la demande d’information 609el FP815-190004/A

Page 3 of 63

6. Closing date for the RFI: Responses to this RFI are to be submitted to the PWGSC Contracting Authority identified above by close of business, on or before Wednesday July 31, 2019.

7. Feedback from Industry

DFO is seeking information from industry in regard to its anticipated evaluation approach provided in Annex B. Specifically, please provide a response to each of the following questions:

- What is your feedback on the proposed evaluation approach? - What is your feedback on the proposed Mandatory Criteria? - Are there additional areas that Canada should consider addressing in the

Technical Proposal Evaluation? 8. Follow-up Activity Canada may, in its discretion, contact any respondents to follow up with additional questions or for clarification of any aspect of a response. Canada reserves the right to invite any or all respondents to present their submissions to this RFI and/or perform a product demonstration.

Request for Information No. – Am. No. - N° de la modif. Buyer ID - Id de l'acheteur N° de la demande d’information 609el FP815-190004/A

Page 4 of 63

ANNEX A – Project Summary

Introduction

Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) has launched the Financial Systems Renewal (FSR) – SAP Implementation initiative to modernize and transform its financial management systems and processes. DFO will be engaging a Systems Integrator (SI) to lead the design, development and implementation of Phase 1 of a new best in class financial systems solution, to be released on April 1, 2021. The RFP for these services is targeted to be released in August 2019.

Departmental Background

DFO has the lead federal role in managing Canada’s fisheries and safeguarding its waters. Through sound science, forward-looking policy, and operational and service excellence, DFO employees work collaboratively toward the following three strategic outcomes:

Economically Prosperous Maritime Sectors and Fisheries; Sustainable Aquatic Ecosystems; and Safe and Secure Waters.

The Canadian Coast Guard (CCG), a special operating agency within DFO, is responsible for services and programs that contribute to the Department's strategic outcomes and to the safety, security, and accessibility of Canada's waterways.

Financial Systems Renewal (FSR) – SAP Implementation Project Overview

DFO is currently using Oracle Financials (version 12.1.3) which was implemented in December 2013 as the financial system of record. This current version is nearing the end of its lifecycle, with vendor support for this version ending in December 2021. The Oracle Financials implementation at DFO is referred to as the “ABACUS” system. Over the past few years, investments in ABACUS have been minimal, which has, over time, increased the risk to the Department. Furthermore, DFO has developed several add-on systems to address specific needs / requirements which has exacerbated maintenance and support costs. This compounds the risks as DFO nears a potential state of un-supported Oracle Financials software. To mitigate the risks associated with ABACUS, DFO requires a new Financial Systems Solution that not only meets its mandatory financial and materiel management requirements, but also serves as a key enabler of internal services transformation to better support the diverse and complex programs and services that the organization delivers. In 2012, Treasury Board Secretariat (TBS) established SAP as the standard Financial and Materiel Management System for the Government of Canada. The TBS Office of the Comptroller General (OCG) is developing an SAP S/4 HANA Digital Core for small GoC

Request for Information No. – Am. No. - N° de la modif. Buyer ID - Id de l'acheteur N° de la demande d’information 609el FP815-190004/A

Page 5 of 63

departments that are currently using FreeBalance software for their financial systems. Known as the Government of Canada Finance and Materiel Management (GCfm) solution, this Digital Core is considered the “A” template for S/4HANA solutions in the GoC. Furthermore, the OCG has taken the lead on deploying S/4HANA within a GoC approved Protected B, medium integrity, and medium availability (PBMM) cloud environment. DFO is a member of the GoC’s Oracle Cluster. The OCG has not yet established a template / solution for Oracle Cluster members or other departments which are significantly larger than the typical FreeBalance departments. DFO and the OCG have agreed to establish a new “B” template leveraging the GCfm solution Digital Core as a baseline for large departments. DFO will leverage the GCfm-A solution and introduce additional capabilities to address any identified gaps to support DFO requirements resulting in the DFO GCfm-B solution. The TBS-OCG SAP solution will bring benefits such as streamlined and automated business processes, strengthened controls, enhanced multi-year financial planning and analysis, as well as real time forecasting and reporting. By migrating to this new platform, DFO will be able to leverage the work of other departments and add functionality specific to DFO’s needs.

FSR – SAP Implementation Scope of Services

The following is a brief description of the scope of services that the selected SI will be required to provide:

Stage 1 – Design: Design services and deliverables, including the business and technical solution designs, with supporting designs and plans for change management, release strategy and post implementation support. A decision to proceed with implementation will be made after Stage 1 – Design.

Stage 2 – Implementation: Develop, integrate, test and deploy the fully functional DFO Financial Systems Solution, including all required data migration and conversions along with the transition to ongoing operations and support.

Project Management & Oversight: Overall responsibility for project management including planning, execution, monitoring and control throughout the implementation.

The SI may also be required to perform or provide additional services as-and-when requested throughout the Contract.

Request for Information No. – Am. No. - N° de la modif. Buyer ID - Id de l'acheteur N° de la demande d’information 609el FP815-190004/A

Page 6 of 63

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

7 o

f 63

AN

NE

X B

– A

nti

cip

ated

eva

luat

ion

ap

pro

ach

Tec

hn

ical

Pro

po

sal

Eva

luat

ion

Str

uct

ure

Bidd

er T

echn

ical

Pro

posa

ls w

ill b

e ev

alua

ted

base

d on

the

follo

win

g st

ruct

ure.

Add

ition

al d

etai

ls on

the

Man

dato

ry C

riter

ia, P

oint

Rat

ed C

riter

ia,

and

Ora

l Pre

sent

atio

n ar

e pr

ovid

ed in

the

sect

ions

that

follo

w.

A.

Man

dato

ry C

riter

ia

i. SA

P Fi

nanc

ials

Impl

emen

tatio

n Ex

perie

nce

ii.

SAP

S/4H

ANA

Impl

emen

tatio

n Ex

perie

nce

iii.

Busin

ess T

rans

form

atio

n Im

plem

enta

tion

Expe

rienc

e

B.

Poin

t Rat

ed C

riter

ia (1

200

poin

ts)

i. M

etho

dolo

gy: M

etho

dolo

gy

ii.

Proj

ect A

ppro

ach:

Bus

ines

s Tra

nsfo

rmat

ion,

Cha

nge

Man

agem

ent,

Skill

Dev

elop

men

t and

Kno

wle

dge

Tran

sfer

iii

. Pr

ojec

t Tea

m: P

roje

ct T

eam

Str

uctu

re, K

ey R

esou

rces

iv

. Pr

ojec

t Pla

ns: D

esig

n St

age

Plan

, Im

plem

enta

tion

Stag

e Pl

an

C.

O

ral P

rese

ntat

ion

(300

poi

nts)

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

8 o

f 63

Tec

hn

ical

Pro

po

sal

Eva

luat

ion

– M

and

ato

ry C

rite

ria

MC

1 –

SA

P F

inan

cial

s Im

plem

enta

tion

Exp

erie

nce

M

anda

tory

Cr

iteria

ID

Man

dato

ry C

riter

ia D

escr

iptio

n

MC1

Th

e Bi

dder

mus

t pro

vide

thre

e (3

) Ref

eren

ce P

roje

cts1 w

here

the

Bidd

er o

r an

Affil

iate

2 of t

he B

idde

r com

plet

ed th

e im

plem

enta

tion

of a

n SA

P Fi

nanc

ials

Sol

utio

n3 that

mee

ts th

e fo

llow

ing

crite

ria:

a)

The

Proj

ect V

alue

4 of t

he R

efer

ence

Pro

ject

1 mus

t be

$25M

(CAD

) or g

reat

er;

b)

Th

e Co

ntra

ct V

alue

5 of t

he R

efer

ence

Pro

ject

1 mus

t be

$15M

(CAD

) or g

reat

er;

c)

The

Refe

renc

e Pr

ojec

t1 mus

t hav

e be

en c

ompl

eted

in th

e pa

st n

inet

y-six

(96)

mon

ths p

rior t

o th

e RF

P Po

stin

g Da

te;

d)

The

Refe

renc

e Pr

ojec

t1 mus

t hav

e be

en d

eplo

yed

to a

t lea

st 3

,000

use

rs in

mul

tiple

loca

tions

, in

a de

cent

raliz

ed, m

ulti-

regi

onal

env

ironm

ent;

Colle

ctiv

ely,

the

Refe

renc

e Pr

ojec

ts1 m

ust m

eet t

he fo

llow

ing

crite

ria:

e)

A m

inim

um o

f one

of t

he R

efer

ence

Pro

ject

s1 mus

t be

for s

ervi

ces p

rovi

ded

by th

e Bi

dder

itse

lf (i.

e., v

ersu

s pro

vide

d by

an

Aff

iliat

e2 ). A

Tec

hnic

al P

ropo

sal w

here

the

Bidd

er o

nly

subm

its p

roje

cts u

nder

take

n by

an

Affil

iate

2 will

be

deem

ed

non-

com

plia

nt; a

nd

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

9 o

f 63

Man

dato

ry

Crite

ria ID

M

anda

tory

Crit

eria

Des

crip

tion

f) Th

e Bi

dder

mus

t dem

onst

rate

, usin

g th

e th

ree

(3) R

efer

ence

Pro

ject

s1 , tha

t (A)

the

Bidd

er o

r an

Affil

iate

2 ha

s ex

perie

nce

perf

orm

ing

all o

f the

follo

win

g se

rvic

es; a

nd (B

) eac

h Re

fere

nce

Proj

ect1 in

clud

es o

ne o

r mor

e of

the

follo

win

g se

rvic

es*:

i. Bu

sines

s Pro

cess

Des

ign;

ii.

So

lutio

n An

alys

is;

iii.

Solu

tion

Desig

n;

iv.

Solu

tion

Deve

lopm

ent;

v.

Solu

tion

Depl

oym

ent;

vi.

Org

aniz

atio

nal C

hang

e M

anag

emen

t; vi

i. Tr

aini

ng;

viii.

Pr

ojec

t Man

agem

ent;

and

ix

. Po

st Im

plem

enta

tion

Supp

ort.

* Th

e fo

llow

ing

defin

ition

s app

ly to

the

eval

uatio

n of

this

requ

irem

ent:

1) B

usin

ess P

roce

ss D

esig

n: T

he a

ctiv

ity o

f des

igni

ng th

e bu

sines

s pro

cess

es re

quire

d to

mee

t a se

t of b

usin

ess r

equi

rem

ents

. Pr

oces

s des

ign

uses

a n

umbe

r of t

ools

inclu

ding

pro

cess

nar

rativ

es, p

roce

ss fl

ow ch

arts

, and

pro

cess

step

s.

2) S

olut

ion

Anal

ysis:

The

act

ivity

of d

evel

opin

g bu

sines

s and

syst

em re

quire

men

ts, a

s wel

l as b

usin

ess a

nd sy

stem

use

case

s for

th

e bu

sines

s pro

cess

es a

nd su

b-pr

oces

ses.

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

10

of 6

3

Man

dato

ry

Crite

ria ID

M

anda

tory

Crit

eria

Des

crip

tion

3) S

olut

ion

Desi

gn: T

he a

ctiv

ity o

f dev

elop

ing

busin

ess a

nd sy

stem

pro

cess

es, a

rchi

tect

ures

and

app

licat

ion

desig

ns fo

r the

so

lutio

n be

ing

impl

emen

ted.

4) S

olut

ion

Deve

lopm

ent:

The

tailo

ring,

conf

igur

atio

n, p

rogr

amm

ing,

inte

grat

ion,

doc

umen

tatio

n, q

ualit

y m

anag

emen

t and

te

stin

g of

syst

em co

mpo

nent

s for

the

solu

tion

bein

g im

plem

ente

d.

5) S

olut

ion

Depl

oym

ent:

Peop

le, p

roce

ss a

nd te

chno

logy

act

iviti

es re

latin

g to

the

impl

emen

tatio

n of

the

desig

ned

and

deve

lope

d so

lutio

n, in

cludi

ng p

lann

ing

and

exec

utio

n of

rele

ase

man

agem

ent a

ctiv

ities

; mov

emen

t of a

pplic

atio

ns fr

om

deve

lopm

ent a

nd te

st e

nviro

nmen

ts to

the

prod

uctio

n en

viro

nmen

t; fin

al p

erfo

rman

ce a

nd se

curit

y te

stin

g, d

ata

conv

ersio

n,

inte

grat

ion

test

ing;

and

tran

sitio

n to

supp

ort s

ervi

ces.

6) O

rgan

izat

iona

l Cha

nge

Man

agem

ent:

Org

aniza

tiona

l Cha

nge

Man

agem

ent (

OCM

) sup

port

s the

chan

ging

nee

ds a

nd

capa

bilit

ies o

f an

orga

niza

tion.

OCM

is u

sed

to p

repa

re, a

dopt

and

impl

emen

t org

aniza

tiona

l cha

nges

, inc

ludi

ng ch

ange

s to

cultu

re, p

olici

es, a

nd p

roce

dure

s, as

wel

l as e

mpl

oyee

role

s, sk

ills a

nd re

spon

sibili

ties.

7) T

rain

ing:

Des

ign,

dev

elop

men

t, m

anag

emen

t and

del

iver

y of

trai

n-th

e-tr

aine

r and

/or e

nd u

ser t

rain

ing

requ

irem

ents

, st

rate

gies

and

mat

eria

ls in

clud

ing

clas

sroo

m tr

aini

ng, c

ompu

ter-

base

d tr

aini

ng, t

utor

ials,

pre

sent

atio

ns, s

elf-h

elp

guid

es a

nd

othe

r tra

inin

g do

cum

enta

tion.

8) P

roje

ct M

anag

emen

t: Se

rvic

es fo

r pro

ject

man

agem

ent p

lann

ing,

exe

cutio

n, m

onito

ring

and

cont

rol o

f act

iviti

es d

efin

ed in

a

proj

ect p

lan

requ

ired

for t

he im

plem

enta

tion

of th

e so

lutio

n, in

cludi

ng in

tegr

atio

n m

anag

emen

t, sc

ope

man

agem

ent,

sche

dule

m

anag

emen

t, qu

ality

man

agem

ent,

stat

us re

port

ing,

as w

ell a

s risk

and

issu

e m

anag

emen

t.

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

11

of 6

3

Man

dato

ry

Crite

ria ID

M

anda

tory

Crit

eria

Des

crip

tion

9) P

ost I

mpl

emen

tatio

n Su

ppor

t: Th

e se

rvic

es re

quire

d du

ring

a st

abili

zatio

n pe

riod

afte

r im

plem

enta

tion

of th

e so

lutio

n, w

hich

pr

ovid

es b

usin

ess a

nd te

chni

cal s

uppo

rt to

ens

ure

user

enq

uire

s and

syst

em is

sues

are

man

aged

to h

elp

ensu

re th

e tr

ansit

ion

to

the

new

solu

tion

and

syst

em.

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

12

of 6

3

MC

2 –

SA

P S

/4H

AN

A Im

plem

enta

tion

Exp

erie

nce

M

anda

tory

Cr

iteria

ID

Man

dato

ry C

riter

ia D

escr

iptio

n

MC2

Th

e Bi

dder

mus

t pro

vide

thre

e (3

) Ref

eren

ce P

roje

cts1 w

here

the

Bidd

er o

r an

Affil

iate

2 of t

he B

idde

r com

plet

ed a

n SA

P S/

4HAN

A Im

plem

enta

tion6 th

at m

eets

the

follo

win

g cr

iteria

:

a)

The

Proj

ect V

alue

4 of t

he R

efer

ence

Pro

ject

1 mus

t be

$15M

(CAD

) or g

reat

er;

b)

Th

e Co

ntra

ct V

alue

5 of t

he R

efer

ence

Pro

ject

1 mus

t be

$10M

(CAD

) or g

reat

er;

c)

Th

e Re

fere

nce

Proj

ect1 m

ust h

ave

been

com

plet

ed in

the

past

sixt

y (6

0) m

onth

s prio

r to

the

RFP

Post

ing

Date

;

d)

The

Refe

renc

e Pr

ojec

t1 mus

t hav

e be

en d

eplo

yed

to a

t lea

st 1

,000

use

rs in

mul

tiple

loca

tions

, in

a de

cent

raliz

ed, m

ulti-

regi

onal

env

ironm

ent;

Colle

ctiv

ely,

the

Refe

renc

e Pr

ojec

ts1 m

ust m

eet t

he fo

llow

ing

crite

ria:

e)

A m

inim

um o

f one

of t

he R

efer

ence

Pro

ject

s1 mus

t be

for s

ervi

ces p

rovi

ded

by th

e Bi

dder

itse

lf (i.

e., v

ersu

s pro

vide

d by

an

Aff

iliat

e2 ). A

Tec

hnic

al P

ropo

sal w

here

the

Bidd

er o

nly

subm

its p

roje

cts u

nder

take

n by

an

Affil

iate

2 will

be

deem

ed

non-

com

plia

nt;

f)

A m

inim

um o

f one

Ref

eren

ce P

roje

ct1 m

ust b

e fo

r ser

vice

s pro

vide

d by

the

Bidd

er to

mig

rate

to S

AP S

/4HA

NA

from

an

non-

SAP

Ente

rpris

e Re

sour

ce P

lann

ing

solu

tion

(e.g

., O

racl

e); a

nd

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

13

of 6

3

Man

dato

ry

Crite

ria ID

M

anda

tory

Crit

eria

Des

crip

tion

g)

The

Bidd

er m

ust d

emon

stra

te, u

sing

the

thre

e (3

) Ref

eren

ce P

roje

cts1 , t

hat (

A) th

e Bi

dder

or a

n Af

filia

te2 ha

s ex

perie

nce

perf

orm

ing

all o

f the

follo

win

g se

rvic

es; a

nd (B

) eac

h Re

fere

nce

Proj

ect1 in

clud

es o

ne o

r mor

e of

the

follo

win

g se

rvic

es*:

i. Bu

sines

s Pro

cess

Des

ign;

ii.

So

lutio

n An

alys

is;

iii.

Solu

tion

Desig

n;

iv.

Solu

tion

Deve

lopm

ent;

v.

Solu

tion

Depl

oym

ent;

vi.

Org

aniz

atio

nal C

hang

e M

anag

emen

t; vi

i. Tr

aini

ng;

viii.

Pr

ojec

t Man

agem

ent;

and

ix

. Po

st Im

plem

enta

tion

Supp

ort.

* Th

e fo

llow

ing

defin

ition

s app

ly to

the

eval

uatio

n of

this

requ

irem

ent:

1) B

usin

ess P

roce

ss D

esig

n: T

he a

ctiv

ity o

f des

igni

ng th

e bu

sines

s pro

cess

es re

quire

d to

mee

t a se

t of b

usin

ess r

equi

rem

ents

. Pr

oces

s des

ign

uses

a n

umbe

r of t

ools

inclu

ding

pro

cess

nar

rativ

es, p

roce

ss fl

ow ch

arts

, and

pro

cess

step

s.

2) S

olut

ion

Anal

ysis:

The

act

ivity

of d

evel

opin

g bu

sines

s and

syst

em re

quire

men

ts, a

s wel

l as b

usin

ess a

nd sy

stem

use

case

s for

th

e bu

sines

s pro

cess

es a

nd su

b-pr

oces

ses.

3) S

olut

ion

Desi

gn: T

he a

ctiv

ity o

f dev

elop

ing

busin

ess a

nd sy

stem

pro

cess

es, a

rchi

tect

ures

and

app

licat

ion

desig

ns fo

r the

so

lutio

n be

ing

impl

emen

ted.

4) S

olut

ion

Deve

lopm

ent:

The

tailo

ring,

conf

igur

atio

n, p

rogr

amm

ing,

inte

grat

ion,

doc

umen

tatio

n, q

ualit

y m

anag

emen

t and

te

stin

g of

syst

em co

mpo

nent

s for

the

solu

tion

bein

g im

plem

ente

d.

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

14

of 6

3

Man

dato

ry

Crite

ria ID

M

anda

tory

Crit

eria

Des

crip

tion

5) S

olut

ion

Depl

oym

ent:

Peop

le, p

roce

ss a

nd te

chno

logy

act

iviti

es re

latin

g to

the

impl

emen

tatio

n of

the

desig

ned

and

deve

lope

d so

lutio

n, in

cludi

ng p

lann

ing

and

exec

utio

n of

rele

ase

man

agem

ent a

ctiv

ities

; mov

emen

t of a

pplic

atio

ns fr

om

deve

lopm

ent a

nd te

st e

nviro

nmen

ts to

the

prod

uctio

n en

viro

nmen

t; fin

al p

erfo

rman

ce a

nd se

curit

y te

stin

g, d

ata

conv

ersio

n,

inte

grat

ion

test

ing;

and

tran

sitio

n to

supp

ort s

ervi

ces.

6) O

rgan

izat

iona

l Cha

nge

Man

agem

ent:

Org

aniza

tiona

l Cha

nge

Man

agem

ent (

OCM

) sup

port

s the

chan

ging

nee

ds a

nd

capa

bilit

ies o

f an

orga

niza

tion.

OCM

is u

sed

to p

repa

re, a

dopt

and

impl

emen

t org

aniza

tiona

l cha

nges

, inc

ludi

ng ch

ange

s to

cultu

re, p

olici

es, a

nd p

roce

dure

s, as

wel

l as e

mpl

oyee

role

s, sk

ills a

nd re

spon

sibili

ties.

7) T

rain

ing:

Des

ign,

dev

elop

men

t, m

anag

emen

t and

del

iver

y of

trai

n-th

e-tr

aine

r and

/or e

nd u

ser t

rain

ing

requ

irem

ents

, st

rate

gies

and

mat

eria

ls in

clud

ing

clas

sroo

m tr

aini

ng, c

ompu

ter-

base

d tr

aini

ng, t

utor

ials,

pre

sent

atio

ns, s

elf-h

elp

guid

es a

nd

othe

r tra

inin

g do

cum

enta

tion.

8) P

roje

ct M

anag

emen

t: Se

rvic

es fo

r pro

ject

man

agem

ent p

lann

ing,

exe

cutio

n, m

onito

ring

and

cont

rol o

f act

iviti

es d

efin

ed in

a

proj

ect p

lan

requ

ired

for t

he im

plem

enta

tion

of th

e so

lutio

n, in

cludi

ng in

tegr

atio

n m

anag

emen

t, sc

ope

man

agem

ent,

sche

dule

m

anag

emen

t, qu

ality

man

agem

ent,

stat

us re

port

ing,

as w

ell a

s risk

and

issu

e m

anag

emen

t.

9) P

ost I

mpl

emen

tatio

n Su

ppor

t: Th

e se

rvic

es re

quire

d du

ring

a st

abili

zatio

n pe

riod

afte

r im

plem

enta

tion

of th

e so

lutio

n, w

hich

pr

ovid

es b

usin

ess a

nd te

chni

cal s

uppo

rt to

ens

ure

user

enq

uire

s and

syst

em is

sues

are

man

aged

to h

elp

ensu

re th

e tr

ansit

ion

to

the

new

solu

tion

and

syst

em.

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

15

of 6

3

MC

3 –

Bus

ines

s T

rans

form

atio

n Im

plem

enta

tion

Exp

erie

nce

Man

dato

ry

Crite

ria ID

M

anda

tory

Crit

eria

Des

crip

tion

MC3

Th

e Bi

dder

mus

t pro

vide

thre

e (3

) Ref

eren

ce P

roje

cts1 w

here

the

Bidd

er o

r an

Affil

iate

2 of t

he B

idde

r com

plet

ed th

e im

plem

enta

tion

of a

Bus

ines

s Tra

nsfo

rmat

ion

Proj

ect7 th

at m

eets

the

follo

win

g cr

iteria

:

a)

The

Proj

ect V

alue

4 of t

he R

efer

ence

Pro

ject

1 mus

t be

$25M

(CAD

) or g

reat

er;

b)

Th

e Co

ntra

ct V

alue

5 of t

he R

efer

ence

Pro

ject

1 mus

t be

$15M

(CAD

) or g

reat

er;

c)

The

Refe

renc

e Pr

ojec

t1 mus

t hav

e be

en c

ompl

eted

in th

e pa

st n

inet

y-six

(96)

mon

ths p

rior t

o th

e RF

P Po

stin

g Da

te;

d)

The

Refe

renc

e Pr

ojec

t1 mus

t hav

e be

en d

eplo

yed

to a

t lea

st 3

,000

use

rs in

mul

tiple

loca

tions

, in

a de

cent

raliz

ed, m

ulti-

regi

onal

env

ironm

ent;

Colle

ctiv

ely,

the

Refe

renc

e Pr

ojec

ts1 m

ust m

eet t

he fo

llow

ing

crite

ria:

e)

A m

inim

um o

f one

of t

he R

efer

ence

Pro

ject

s1 mus

t be

for s

ervi

ces p

rovi

ded

by th

e Bi

dder

itse

lf (i.

e., v

ersu

s pro

vide

d by

an

Aff

iliat

e2 ). A

Tec

hnic

al P

ropo

sal w

here

the

Bidd

er o

nly

subm

its p

roje

cts u

nder

take

n by

an

Affil

iate

2 will

be

deem

ed

non-

com

plia

nt; a

nd

f) Th

e Bi

dder

mus

t dem

onst

rate

, usin

g th

e th

ree

(3) R

efer

ence

Pro

ject

s1 , tha

t (A)

the

Bidd

er o

r an

Affil

iate

2 ha

s ex

perie

nce

perf

orm

ing

all o

f the

follo

win

g se

rvic

es; a

nd (B

) eac

h Re

fere

nce

Proj

ect1 in

clud

es o

ne o

r mor

e of

the

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

16

of 6

3

Man

dato

ry

Crite

ria ID

M

anda

tory

Crit

eria

Des

crip

tion

follo

win

g se

rvic

es*:

i. Bu

sines

s Pro

cess

Des

ign;

ii.

So

lutio

n An

alys

is;

iii.

Solu

tion

Desig

n;

iv.

Solu

tion

Deve

lopm

ent;

v.

Solu

tion

Depl

oym

ent;

vi.

Org

aniz

atio

nal C

hang

e M

anag

emen

t; vi

i. St

akeh

olde

r Eng

agem

ent

viii.

Co

mm

unic

atio

ns;

ix.

Stak

ehol

der R

elat

ions

hip

Man

agem

ent;

x.

Trai

ning

; and

xi

. Pr

ojec

t Man

agem

ent.

* Th

e fo

llow

ing

defin

ition

s app

ly to

the

eval

uatio

n of

this

requ

irem

ent:

1) B

usin

ess P

roce

ss D

esig

n: T

he a

ctiv

ity o

f des

igni

ng th

e bu

sines

s pro

cess

es re

quire

d to

mee

t a se

t of b

usin

ess r

equi

rem

ents

. Pr

oces

s des

ign

uses

a n

umbe

r of t

ools

inclu

ding

pro

cess

nar

rativ

es, p

roce

ss fl

ow ch

arts

, and

pro

cess

step

s.

2) S

olut

ion

Anal

ysis:

The

act

ivity

of d

evel

opin

g bu

sines

s and

syst

em re

quire

men

ts, a

s wel

l as b

usin

ess a

nd sy

stem

use

case

s for

th

e bu

sines

s pro

cess

es a

nd su

b-pr

oces

ses.

3) S

olut

ion

Desi

gn: T

he a

ctiv

ity o

f dev

elop

ing

busin

ess a

nd sy

stem

pro

cess

es, a

rchi

tect

ures

and

app

licat

ion

desig

ns fo

r the

so

lutio

n be

ing

impl

emen

ted.

4) S

olut

ion

Deve

lopm

ent:

The

tailo

ring,

conf

igur

atio

n, p

rogr

amm

ing,

inte

grat

ion,

doc

umen

tatio

n, q

ualit

y m

anag

emen

t and

te

stin

g of

syst

em co

mpo

nent

s for

the

solu

tion

bein

g im

plem

ente

d.

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

17

of 6

3

Man

dato

ry

Crite

ria ID

M

anda

tory

Crit

eria

Des

crip

tion

5) S

olut

ion

Depl

oym

ent:

Peop

le, p

roce

ss a

nd te

chno

logy

act

iviti

es re

latin

g to

the

impl

emen

tatio

n of

the

desig

ned

and

deve

lope

d so

lutio

n, in

cludi

ng p

lann

ing

and

exec

utio

n of

rele

ase

man

agem

ent a

ctiv

ities

; mov

emen

t of a

pplic

atio

ns fr

om

deve

lopm

ent a

nd te

st e

nviro

nmen

ts to

the

prod

uctio

n en

viro

nmen

t; fin

al p

erfo

rman

ce a

nd se

curit

y te

stin

g, d

ata

conv

ersio

n,

inte

grat

ion

test

ing;

and

tran

sitio

n to

supp

ort s

ervi

ces.

6) O

rgan

izat

iona

l Cha

nge

Man

agem

ent:

Org

aniza

tiona

l Cha

nge

Man

agem

ent (

OCM

) sup

port

s the

chan

ging

nee

ds a

nd

capa

bilit

ies o

f an

orga

niza

tion.

OCM

is u

sed

to p

repa

re, a

dopt

and

impl

emen

t org

aniza

tiona

l cha

nges

, inc

ludi

ng ch

ange

s to

cultu

re, p

olici

es, a

nd p

roce

dure

s, as

wel

l as e

mpl

oyee

role

s, sk

ills a

nd re

spon

sibili

ties.

7) S

take

hold

er E

ngag

emen

t: Th

e pr

oces

s by

whi

ch a

n or

gani

zatio

n in

volv

es p

eopl

e w

ho m

ay b

e af

fect

ed b

y th

e de

cisio

ns it

m

akes

or c

an in

fluen

ce th

e im

plem

enta

tion

of it

s dec

ision

s. Th

is m

ay in

clud

e di

rect

and

indi

rect

com

mun

icat

ions

, wor

ksho

ps,

mee

tings

, etc

.

8) C

omm

unic

atio

ns: D

ocum

enta

tion

and

prov

ision

of c

omm

uniq

ues,

brie

fing

note

s and

pre

sent

atio

ns o

f var

ious

asp

ects

of a

pr

ojec

t foc

used

to th

e le

vel,

unde

rsta

ndin

g an

d fo

cus o

f key

stak

ehol

ders

inclu

ding

seni

or e

xecu

tives

.

9) S

take

hold

er R

elat

ions

hip

Man

agem

ent:

The

man

agem

ent o

f all

aspe

cts o

f the

wor

king

rela

tions

hip

betw

een

the

proj

ect a

nd

its im

pact

ed in

tern

al a

nd e

xter

nal s

take

hold

ers.

This

incl

udes

a h

olist

ic re

latio

nshi

p m

anag

emen

t str

ateg

y to

ens

ure

alig

nmen

t ac

ross

rele

vant

leve

ls of

the

orga

niza

tion,

whi

ch m

ay in

clude

wor

king

sess

ions

, exe

cutiv

e m

eetin

gs a

nd ta

rget

ed co

mm

unic

atio

ns

to e

nsur

e a

firm

und

erst

andi

ng o

f the

stak

ehol

ders

’ key

chal

leng

es, b

usin

ess,

tran

sfor

mat

iona

l driv

ers,

and

supp

ort f

or

impl

emen

tatio

n re

adin

ess.

10) T

rain

ing:

Des

ign,

dev

elop

men

t, m

anag

emen

t and

del

iver

y of

trai

n-th

e-tr

aine

r and

/or e

nd u

ser t

rain

ing

requ

irem

ents

, st

rate

gies

and

mat

eria

ls in

clud

ing

clas

sroo

m tr

aini

ng, c

ompu

ter-

base

d tr

aini

ng, t

utor

ials,

pre

sent

atio

ns, s

elf-h

elp

guid

es a

nd

othe

r tra

inin

g do

cum

enta

tion.

11) P

roje

ct M

anag

emen

t: Se

rvice

s for

pro

ject

man

agem

ent p

lann

ing,

exe

cutio

n, m

onito

ring

and

cont

rol o

f act

iviti

es d

efin

ed in

a

proj

ect p

lan

requ

ired

for t

he im

plem

enta

tion

of th

e so

lutio

n, in

cludi

ng in

tegr

atio

n m

anag

emen

t, sc

ope

man

agem

ent,

sche

dule

m

anag

emen

t, qu

ality

man

agem

ent,

stat

us re

port

ing,

as w

ell a

s risk

and

issu

e m

anag

emen

t.

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

18

of 6

3

Ap

pen

dix

1 t

o T

ech

nic

al

Pro

po

sal E

valu

atio

n –

Man

dat

ory

Cri

teri

a: D

efin

itio

ns

The

follo

win

g de

finiti

ons a

pply

to th

e M

anda

tory

Tec

hnic

al E

valu

atio

n Cr

iteria

.

1.

Refe

renc

e Pr

ojec

t(s)

: A R

efer

ence

Pro

ject

is a

clie

nt-d

efin

ed p

roje

ct fo

r whi

ch th

e Bi

dder

or a

n Af

filia

te2 o

f the

Bid

der p

erfo

rmed

som

e or

all

of th

e se

rvic

es to

ass

ist th

e cl

ient

in d

eliv

erin

g th

e pr

ojec

t.

2.

Affil

iate

(s):

Is de

fined

in a

ccor

danc

e w

ith A

rtic

le 0

1 –

Inte

grity

Pro

visio

ns –

Bid

– (2

015-

07-0

3) o

f the

200

3 St

anda

rd In

stru

ctio

ns –

Goo

ds

or S

ervi

ces –

Com

petit

ive

Requ

irem

ents

. Th

e Bi

dder

mus

t pro

vide

an

orga

niza

tion

char

t for

the

Bidd

er sh

owin

g al

l per

son,

incl

udin

g, b

ut n

ot li

mite

d to

, org

aniza

tions

, bod

ies

corp

orat

e, so

ciet

ies,

com

pani

es, f

irms,

par

tner

ship

s, a

ssoc

iatio

ns o

f per

sons

, par

ent c

ompa

nies

or s

ubsid

iarie

s, w

heth

er p

artly

or

who

lly-o

wne

d, a

s wel

l as i

ndiv

idua

ls, d

irect

ors,

offic

ers a

nd k

ey e

mpl

oyee

s if:

a.

one

cont

rols

or h

as th

e po

wer

to c

ontr

ol th

e ot

her,

or

b.

a th

ird p

arty

has

the

pow

er to

con

trol

bot

h.

If th

e re

quire

d or

gani

zatio

n ch

art h

as n

ot b

een

rece

ived

by

the

time

the

eval

uatio

n of

resp

onse

s is c

ompl

eted

, Can

ada

will

info

rm th

e Bi

dder

of a

tim

e fr

ame

with

in w

hich

to p

rovi

de th

e in

form

atio

n. F

ailu

re to

pro

vide

the

orga

niza

tion

char

t with

in th

e tim

e fr

ame

spec

ified

w

ill re

nder

the

Bidd

er re

spon

se n

on-r

espo

nsiv

e. P

rovi

ding

the

requ

ired

orga

niza

tion

char

t is a

man

dato

ry re

quire

men

t for

this

RFP.

As

per

the

Cana

da B

usin

ess C

orpo

ratio

ns A

ct, A

ffilia

ted

bodi

es a

re d

efin

ed a

s:

a)

one

body

cor

pora

te a

ffilia

ted

with

ano

ther

bod

y co

rpor

ate

if on

e of

them

is th

e su

bsid

iary

of t

he o

ther

or b

oth

are

subs

idia

ries o

f th

e sa

me

body

corp

orat

e or

eac

h of

them

is c

ontr

olle

d by

the

sam

e pe

rson

; and

b)

if

two

bodi

es c

orpo

rate

are

affi

liate

d w

ith th

e sa

me

body

cor

pora

te a

t the

sam

e tim

e, th

ey a

re d

eem

ed to

be

affil

iate

d w

ith e

ach

othe

r.

3.

SAP

Fina

ncia

ls S

olut

ion:

A p

roje

ct in

volv

ing

the

impl

emen

tatio

n of

an

SAP

finan

cial

man

agem

ent s

olut

ion

usin

g th

e SA

P Fi

nanc

ial

Acco

untin

g (F

I) an

d Co

ntro

lling

(CO

) mod

ules

, usin

g SA

P En

terp

rise

Reso

urce

Pla

nnin

g Fi

nanc

ials

, or u

sing

SAP

S/4H

ANA

Fina

nce.

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

19

of 6

3

4.

Proj

ect V

alue

: Tot

al c

ost o

f the

pro

ject

, in

Cana

dian

dol

lars

(CAD

$), i

nclu

ding

the

clie

nt o

rgan

izat

ion’

s int

erna

l cos

ts, e

xter

nal

prof

essio

nal s

ervi

ces c

osts

, har

dwar

e co

sts,

and

soft

war

e co

sts.

5.

Cont

ract

Val

ue: T

he to

tal c

ontr

act v

alue

to B

idde

r or i

ts A

ffilia

te2 , i

n Ca

nadi

an d

olla

rs (C

AD$)

, for

all

prof

essio

nal s

ervi

ces p

rovi

ded

to

the

clie

nt fo

r the

Ref

eren

ce P

roje

ct1 . T

he to

tal c

ontr

act v

alue

con

sists

of t

he to

tal c

umul

ativ

e va

lue

of a

ll co

ntra

cts t

hat t

he B

idde

r had

fo

r the

Ref

eren

ce P

roje

ct1 .

6.

SAP

S/4H

ANA

Impl

emen

tatio

n: A

pro

ject

that

impl

emen

ted

SAP

S/4H

ANA.

SAP

Bus

ines

s Sui

te 4

SAP

HAN

A (S

AP S

/4HA

NA)

is a

bus

ines

s su

ite th

at is

bui

lt on

SAP

's pr

oprie

tary

ope

ratio

nal d

atab

ase

syst

em a

nd in

-mem

ory

com

putin

g pl

atfo

rm c

alle

d SA

P HA

NA.

SAP

S/4H

ANA

is th

e su

cces

sor o

f SAP

R/3

and

SAP

ERP

and

is o

ptim

ized

for S

AP's

in-m

emor

y da

taba

se S

AP H

ANA.

7.

Busi

ness

Tra

nsfo

rmat

ion

Proj

ect:

A pr

ojec

t whi

ch fu

ndam

enta

lly c

hang

es th

e sy

stem

s, p

roce

sses

, peo

ple

and

tech

nolo

gy a

cros

s a w

hole

bu

sines

s/or

gani

zatio

n or

a b

usin

ess/

orga

niza

tiona

l uni

t, to

ach

ieve

mea

sura

ble

impr

ovem

ents

in o

rgan

izat

iona

l effi

cien

cy, e

ffect

iven

ess,

as

wel

l as i

nter

nal a

nd e

xter

nal s

take

hold

er e

ngag

emen

t and

satis

fact

ion.

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

20

of 6

3

Tec

hn

ical

Pro

po

sal

Eva

luat

ion

: P

oin

t R

ated

Cri

teri

a

Tota

l Poi

nt R

ated

Crit

eria

(120

0 Po

ints

)

R1

– M

eth

od

olo

gy

(20

0 p

oin

ts)

R1.

1 –

Agi

le M

eth

odol

og

y (2

00 p

oint

s)

Poin

t Rat

ed C

riter

ia D

escr

iptio

n M

ax P

ts

Poin

t Allo

catio

n Su

bsta

ntia

tion

The

Bidd

er’s

pro

pose

d M

etho

dolo

gy

shou

ld d

emon

stra

te th

e Bi

dder

’s a

bilit

y to

mee

t the

Met

hodo

logy

Req

uire

men

ts

iden

tifie

d in

App

endi

x 2

of th

e Po

int

Rate

d Te

chni

cal E

valu

atio

n Cr

iteria

w

ithou

t int

rodu

cing

a P

roje

ct R

isk1 .

Not

e: T

he B

idde

r’s re

spon

se to

R1.

1 sh

ould

be

no m

ore

than

twen

ty (2

0)

page

s.

200

200

The

Bidd

er’s

pro

pose

d M

etho

dolo

gy:

M

eets

all

sixte

en M

etho

dolo

gy

Requ

irem

ents

; and

Does

not

intr

oduc

e a

Proj

ect

Risk

1 .

The

Bidd

er sh

ould

pro

pose

a

Met

hodo

logy

the

will

be

used

to d

eliv

er th

e Ta

sks a

nd

Deliv

erab

les i

dent

ified

in

SOW

Sec

tions

7, 8

and

9.

The

Bidd

er sh

ould

pro

vide

a

map

ping

of a

ll De

liver

able

s id

entif

ied

in th

e SO

W to

the

Bidd

er’s

prop

osed

M

etho

dolo

gy.

The

Bidd

er sh

ould

de

mon

stra

te h

ow it

will

en

sure

its p

ropo

sed

Met

hodo

logy

acc

ount

s for

150

The

Bidd

er’s

pro

pose

d M

etho

dolo

gy:

M

eets

Met

hodo

logy

Re

quire

men

t MR-

1;

Mee

ts b

etw

een

11 a

nd 1

5 M

etho

dolo

gy R

equi

rem

ents

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

21

of 6

3

Poin

t Rat

ed C

riter

ia D

escr

iptio

n M

ax P

ts

Poin

t Allo

catio

n Su

bsta

ntia

tion

betw

een

MR-

2 an

d M

R-16

; and

Do

es n

ot in

trod

uce

a Pr

ojec

t Ri

sk1 .

the

Gove

rnm

ent o

f Can

ada

and

DFO

Tec

hnol

ogy

Gove

rnan

ce b

odie

s des

crib

ed

in S

OW

Sec

tion

6.2.

100

The

Bidd

er’s

pro

pose

d M

etho

dolo

gy:

M

eets

Met

hodo

logy

Re

quire

men

t MR-

1;

Mee

ts b

etw

een

7 an

d 10

M

etho

dolo

gy R

equi

rem

ents

be

twee

n M

R-2

and

MR-

16; a

nd

Do

es n

ot in

trod

uce

a Pr

ojec

t Ri

sk1 .

75Th

e Bi

dder

’s p

ropo

sed

Met

hodo

logy

:

M

eets

Met

hodo

logy

Re

quire

men

t MR-

1;

Mee

ts b

etw

een

1 an

d 6

M

etho

dolo

gy R

equi

rem

ents

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

22

of 6

3

Poin

t Rat

ed C

riter

ia D

escr

iptio

n M

ax P

ts

Poin

t Allo

catio

n Su

bsta

ntia

tion

betw

een

MR-

2 an

d M

R-16

; and

Do

es n

ot in

trod

uce

a Pr

ojec

t Ri

sk1 .

50Th

e Bi

dder

’s p

ropo

sed

Met

hodo

logy

:

M

eets

Met

hodo

logy

Re

quire

men

t MR-

1; a

nd

Intr

oduc

es o

ne o

r mor

e Pr

ojec

t Ri

sk1 .

0

The

Bidd

er’s

pro

pose

d M

etho

dolo

gy:

Do

es n

ot m

eet M

etho

dolo

gy

Requ

irem

ent M

R-1.

O

R

M

eets

non

e of

the

Met

hodo

logy

Req

uire

men

ts

betw

een

MR-

2 an

d M

R-16

; an

d

Do

es n

ot in

trod

uce

a Pr

ojec

t

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

23

of 6

3

Poin

t Rat

ed C

riter

ia D

escr

iptio

n M

ax P

ts

Poin

t Allo

catio

n Su

bsta

ntia

tion

Risk

1 .

R2

– P

roje

ct A

pp

roac

h (

450

po

ints

)

R2.

1 –

Bus

ines

s T

rans

form

atio

n A

ppro

ach

(15

0 po

ints

)

Poin

t Rat

ed C

riter

ia D

escr

iptio

n M

ax P

ts

Poin

t Allo

catio

n Su

bsta

ntia

tion

The

Bidd

er’s

pro

pose

d Bu

sines

s Tr

ansf

orm

atio

n Ap

proa

ch sh

ould

de

mon

stra

te th

e Bi

dder

’s ab

ility

to m

eet

the

Busin

ess T

rans

form

atio

n Ap

proa

ch

Requ

irem

ents

iden

tifie

d in

App

endi

x 3

of

the

Poin

t Rat

ed T

echn

ical

Eva

luat

ion

Crite

ria w

ithou

t int

rodu

cing

a P

roje

ct

Risk

1 .

Not

e: T

he B

idde

r’s re

spon

se to

R2.

1 sh

ould

be

no m

ore

than

twen

ty (2

0)

page

s.

150

150

The

Bidd

er’s

pro

pose

d Bu

sines

s Tr

ansf

orm

atio

n Ap

proa

ch:

M

eets

all

eigh

t Bus

ines

s Tr

ansf

orm

atio

n Ap

proa

ch

Requ

irem

ents

; and

Does

not

intr

oduc

e a

Proj

ect

Risk

1 .

The

Bidd

er sh

ould

pro

pose

a

Busin

ess T

rans

form

atio

n Ap

proa

ch th

at w

ill b

e us

ed to

th

roug

hout

the

Desig

n an

d Im

plem

enta

tion

Stag

es.

100

The

Bidd

er’s

pro

pose

d Bu

sines

s Tr

ansf

orm

atio

n Ap

proa

ch:

M

eets

bet

wee

n 5

and

7 Bu

sines

s Tr

ansf

orm

atio

n Ap

proa

ch

Requ

irem

ents

; and

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

24

of 6

3

Poin

t Rat

ed C

riter

ia D

escr

iptio

n M

ax P

ts

Poin

t Allo

catio

n Su

bsta

ntia

tion

Do

es n

ot in

trod

uce

a Pr

ojec

t Ri

sk1 .

75Th

e Bi

dder

’s p

ropo

sed

Busin

ess

Tran

sfor

mat

ion

Appr

oach

:

M

eets

bet

wee

n 1

and

4 Bu

sines

s Tr

ansf

orm

atio

n Ap

proa

ch

Requ

irem

ents

; and

Do

es n

ot in

trod

uce

a Pr

ojec

t Ri

sk1 .

50Th

e Bi

dder

’s p

ropo

sed

Busin

ess

Tran

sfor

mat

ion

Appr

oach

:

In

trod

uces

one

or m

ore

Proj

ect

Risk

1 .

0Th

e Bi

dder

’s p

ropo

sed

Busin

ess

Tran

sfor

mat

ion

Appr

oach

:

Do

es n

ot m

eet a

ny B

usin

ess

Tran

sfor

mat

ion

Appr

oach

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

25

of 6

3

Poin

t Rat

ed C

riter

ia D

escr

iptio

n M

ax P

ts

Poin

t Allo

catio

n Su

bsta

ntia

tion

Requ

irem

ents

.

R2.

2 –

Cha

nge

Man

agem

ent A

ppro

ach

(15

0 p

oint

s)

Poin

t Rat

ed C

riter

ia D

escr

iptio

n M

ax P

ts

Poin

t Allo

catio

n Su

bsta

ntia

tion

The

Bidd

er’s

pro

pose

d Ch

ange

M

anag

emen

t App

roac

h sh

ould

de

mon

stra

te th

e Bi

dder

’s ab

ility

to m

eet

the

Chan

ge M

anag

emen

t App

roac

h Re

quire

men

ts id

entif

ied

in A

ppen

dix

4 of

th

e Po

int R

ated

Tec

hnic

al E

valu

atio

n Cr

iteria

with

out i

ntro

duci

ng a

Pro

ject

Ri

sk1 .

Not

e: T

he B

idde

r’s re

spon

se to

R2.

2 sh

ould

be

no m

ore

than

twen

ty (2

0)

page

s.

150

150

The

Bidd

er’s

pro

pose

d Ch

ange

M

anag

emen

t App

roac

h:

M

eets

all

eigh

t Cha

nge

Man

agem

ent A

ppro

ach

Requ

irem

ents

; and

Does

not

intr

oduc

e a

Proj

ect

Risk

1 .

The

Bidd

er sh

ould

pro

pose

a

Chan

ge M

anag

emen

t Ap

proa

ch th

at w

ill b

e us

ed to

th

roug

hout

the

Desig

n an

d Im

plem

enta

tion

Stag

es.

100

The

Bidd

er’s

pro

pose

d Ch

ange

M

anag

emen

t App

roac

h:

M

eets

bet

wee

n 5

and

7 Ch

ange

M

anag

emen

t App

roac

h Re

quire

men

ts; a

nd

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

26

of 6

3

Poin

t Rat

ed C

riter

ia D

escr

iptio

n M

ax P

ts

Poin

t Allo

catio

n Su

bsta

ntia

tion

Do

es n

ot in

trod

uce

a Pr

ojec

t Ri

sk1 .

75Th

e Bi

dder

’s p

ropo

sed

Chan

ge

Man

agem

ent A

ppro

ach:

M

eets

bet

wee

n 1

and

4 Ch

ange

M

anag

emen

t App

roac

h Re

quire

men

ts; a

nd

Does

not

intr

oduc

e a

Proj

ect

Risk

1 .

50Th

e Bi

dder

’s p

ropo

sed

Chan

ge

Man

agem

ent A

ppro

ach:

In

trod

uces

one

or m

ore

Proj

ect

Risk

1 .

0Th

e Bi

dder

’s p

ropo

sed

Chan

ge

Man

agem

ent A

ppro

ach:

Do

es n

ot m

eet a

ny C

hang

e M

anag

emen

t App

roac

h

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

27

of 6

3

Poin

t Rat

ed C

riter

ia D

escr

iptio

n M

ax P

ts

Poin

t Allo

catio

n Su

bsta

ntia

tion

Requ

irem

ents

.

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

28

of 6

3

R2.

3 –

Ski

ll D

eve

lopm

ent a

nd K

now

ledg

e T

rans

fer

App

roac

h (1

50

poin

ts)

Poin

t Rat

ed C

riter

ia D

escr

iptio

n M

ax P

ts

Poin

t Allo

catio

n Su

bsta

ntia

tion

The

Bidd

er’s

pro

pose

d Sk

ill D

evel

opm

ent

and

Know

ledg

e Tr

ansf

er A

ppro

ach

shou

ld

dem

onst

rate

the

Bidd

er’s

abili

ty to

mee

t th

e Sk

ill D

evel

opm

ent a

nd K

now

ledg

e Tr

ansf

er A

ppro

ach

Requ

irem

ents

id

entif

ied

in A

ppen

dix

5 of

the

Poin

t Ra

ted

Tech

nica

l Eva

luat

ion

Crite

ria

with

out i

ntro

duci

ng a

Pro

ject

Ris

k1 .

Not

e: T

he B

idde

r’s re

spon

se to

R2.

3 sh

ould

be

no m

ore

than

twen

ty (2

0)

page

s.

150

150

The

Bidd

er’s

pro

pose

d Sk

ill

Deve

lopm

ent a

nd K

now

ledg

e Tr

ansf

er A

ppro

ach:

M

eets

all

eigh

t Ski

ll De

velo

pmen

t and

Kno

wle

dge

Tran

sfer

App

roac

h Re

quire

men

ts; a

nd

Do

es n

ot in

trod

uce

a Pr

ojec

t Ri

sk1 .

The

Bidd

er sh

ould

pro

pose

a

Skill

Dev

elop

men

t and

Kn

owle

dge

Tran

sfer

Ap

proa

ch th

at w

ill b

e us

ed to

th

roug

hout

the

Desig

n an

d Im

plem

enta

tion

Stag

es.

100

The

Bidd

er’s

pro

pose

d Sk

ill

Deve

lopm

ent a

nd K

now

ledg

e Tr

ansf

er A

ppro

ach:

M

eets

bet

wee

n 5

and

7 Sk

ill

Deve

lopm

ent a

nd K

now

ledg

e Tr

ansf

er A

ppro

ach

Requ

irem

ents

; and

Do

es n

ot in

trod

uce

a Pr

ojec

t

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

29

of 6

3

Poin

t Rat

ed C

riter

ia D

escr

iptio

n M

ax P

ts

Poin

t Allo

catio

n Su

bsta

ntia

tion

Risk

1 .

75Th

e Bi

dder

’s p

ropo

sed

Skill

De

velo

pmen

t and

Kno

wle

dge

Tran

sfer

App

roac

h:

M

eets

bet

wee

n 1

and

4 Sk

ill

Deve

lopm

ent a

nd K

now

ledg

e Tr

ansf

er A

ppro

ach

Requ

irem

ents

; and

Do

es n

ot in

trod

uce

a Pr

ojec

t Ri

sk1 .

50Th

e Bi

dder

’s p

ropo

sed

Skill

De

velo

pmen

t and

Kno

wle

dge

Tran

sfer

App

roac

h:

In

trod

uces

one

or m

ore

Proj

ect

Risk

1 .

0Th

e Bi

dder

’s p

ropo

sed

Skill

De

velo

pmen

t and

Kno

wle

dge

Tran

sfer

App

roac

h:

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

30

of 6

3

Poin

t Rat

ed C

riter

ia D

escr

iptio

n M

ax P

ts

Poin

t Allo

catio

n Su

bsta

ntia

tion

Do

es n

ot m

eet a

ny S

kill

Deve

lopm

ent a

nd K

now

ledg

e Tr

ansf

er A

ppro

ach

Requ

irem

ents

.

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

31

of 6

3

R3

– P

roje

ct T

eam

(35

0 p

oin

ts)

R3.

1 –

Pro

ject

Te

am S

truc

ture

(10

0 po

ints

)

Poin

t Rat

ed C

riter

ia D

escr

iptio

n M

ax P

ts

Poin

t Allo

catio

n Su

bsta

ntia

tion

The

Bidd

er sh

ould

des

crib

e its

pro

pose

d Pr

ojec

t Tea

m S

truc

ture

and

ass

ocia

ted

Reso

urci

ng S

trat

egy

for t

he D

esig

n an

d Im

plem

enta

tion

Stag

es.

The

Bidd

er’s

pro

pose

d Pr

ojec

t Tea

m

Stru

ctur

e sh

ould

dem

onst

rate

the

Bidd

er’s

abi

lity

to m

eet t

he P

roje

ct T

eam

St

ruct

ure

Requ

irem

ents

iden

tifie

d in

Ap

pend

ix 6

of t

he P

oint

Rat

ed T

echn

ical

Ev

alua

tion

Crite

ria w

ithou

t int

rodu

cing

a

Proj

ect R

isk1 .

Not

e: T

he B

idde

r’s re

spon

se to

R3.

1 sh

ould

be

no m

ore

than

fifte

en (1

5)

page

s.

100

100

The

Bidd

er’s

pro

pose

d Pr

ojec

t Tea

m

Stru

ctur

e:

M

eets

all

ten

Proj

ect T

eam

St

ruct

ure

Requ

irem

ents

; and

Does

not

intr

oduc

e a

Proj

ect

Risk

1 .

The

Bidd

er sh

ould

pro

pose

a

Proj

ect T

eam

Str

uctu

re to

de

liver

the

Task

s and

De

liver

able

s ide

ntifi

ed in

SO

W S

ectio

ns 7

, 8 a

nd 9

.

75

The

Bidd

er’s

pro

pose

d Pr

ojec

t Tea

m

Stru

ctur

e:

M

eets

Pro

ject

Tea

m S

truc

ture

Re

quire

men

ts T

SR-1

and

TSR

-2;

Mee

ts b

etw

een

4 an

d 7

Pro

ject

Te

am S

truc

ture

Req

uire

men

ts

betw

een

TSR-

3 an

d TS

R-10

; and

Do

es n

ot in

trod

uce

a Pr

ojec

t

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

32

of 6

3

Poin

t Rat

ed C

riter

ia D

escr

iptio

n M

ax P

ts

Poin

t Allo

catio

n Su

bsta

ntia

tion

Risk

1 .

50Th

e Bi

dder

’s p

ropo

sed

Proj

ect T

eam

St

ruct

ure:

M

eets

Pro

ject

Tea

m S

truc

ture

Re

quire

men

ts T

SR-1

and

TSR

-2;

Mee

ts b

etw

een

1 an

d 3

Pro

ject

Te

am S

truc

ture

Req

uire

men

ts

betw

een

TSR-

3 an

d TS

R-10

; and

Do

es n

ot in

trod

uce

a Pr

ojec

t Ri

sk1 .

25Th

e Bi

dder

’s p

ropo

sed

Proj

ect T

eam

St

ruct

ure:

M

eets

Pro

ject

Tea

m S

truc

ture

Re

quire

men

ts T

SR-1

and

TSR

-2;

and

Intr

oduc

es o

ne o

r mor

e Pr

ojec

t Ri

sk1 .

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

33

of 6

3

Poin

t Rat

ed C

riter

ia D

escr

iptio

n M

ax P

ts

Poin

t Allo

catio

n Su

bsta

ntia

tion

0Th

e Bi

dder

’s p

ropo

sed

Proj

ect T

eam

St

ruct

ure:

Do

es n

ot m

eet P

roje

ct T

eam

St

ruct

ure

Requ

irem

ent T

SR-1

or

does

not

mee

t Pro

ject

Tea

m

Stru

ctur

e Re

quire

men

t TSR

-2.

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

34

of 6

3

R3.

2 –

Ke

y R

esou

rces

(25

0 po

ints

) T

he B

idde

r sh

oul

d pr

ovid

e a

resu

me

for

each

of

the

Ke

y R

esou

rces

list

ed b

elow

. D

escr

iptio

ns o

f the

ke

y re

sour

ce r

oles

can

be

foun

d in

SO

W

Sec

tion

10.

1.

Ke

y R

eso

urce

s:

Pro

ject

Del

iver

y Le

ad (

PD

L)

B

usin

ess

Tra

nsfo

rmat

ion

Lea

d (B

TL)

Sol

utio

n A

rchi

tect

Le

ad (

SA

L)

T

echn

ica

l Lea

d (T

L)

C

hang

e M

anag

emen

t Lea

d (

CM

L)

Eac

h re

sum

e sh

ould

incl

ud

e th

e fo

llow

ing

info

rmat

ion:

F

ull n

ame

of th

e pr

opo

sed

reso

urce

;

Cer

tific

atio

ns h

eld,

wh

ich

mus

t cur

rent

and

val

id, a

nd n

ot e

xpire

d; a

nd

P

roje

cts

that

dem

onst

rate

the

pro

pose

d r

esou

rces

sui

tabi

lity

agai

nst t

he a

sses

smen

t cri

teri

a id

ent

ifie

d in

sec

tion

R3.

2 –

Key

Res

ou

rces

. R

3.2.

1 P

roje

ct D

eliv

ery

Lea

d (5

0 p

oint

s)

Po

int

Rat

ed C

rite

ria

Des

cri

pti

on

P

oin

t A

lloc

atio

n

1)

The

Bid

der

sho

uld

dem

onst

rate

that

the

pro

pose

d r

eso

urce

’s e

xper

ienc

e in

the

12

0 m

onth

s pr

eced

ing

the

date

of t

he b

id p

ostin

g, a

s th

e P

roje

ct D

eliv

ery

Lead

(P

DL)

res

pons

ible

for

Lar

ge

Sca

le T

ech

no

log

y E

nab

led

Pro

ject

s7. T

o de

mon

stra

te th

is e

xper

ienc

e, th

e B

idde

r sh

ould

iden

tify

Ref

ere

nce

Pro

ject

s6 in

th

e pr

opos

ed r

esou

rce’

s re

sum

e. T

he R

efer

ence

Pro

ject

6 d

eta

ils s

houl

d in

clu

de:

a)

Nam

e of

the

clie

nt o

rgan

iza

tion;

b)

T

he s

tart

and

end

dat

es, a

nd

dura

tion

(in m

onth

s) th

e p

ropo

sed

PD

L w

orke

d on

the

proj

ect;

c)

A d

escr

iptio

n of

the

prop

osed

PD

L’s

role

and

res

pons

ibili

ties;

Up

to

20

po

ints

, as

follo

ws:

20

po

ints

: T

he p

rop

osed

res

ourc

e ha

s a

min

imum

of 6

0 m

onth

s of

exp

erie

nce

in th

e 1

20

mon

ths

prec

edin

g th

e d

ate

of th

e b

id p

ostin

g.

10

po

ints

: T

he p

rop

osed

res

ourc

e ha

s a

betw

een

12 m

onth

s an

d 5

9 m

onth

s of

exp

erie

nce

in th

e

last

120

mon

ths

prec

edin

g th

e d

ate

of t

he b

id

post

ing.

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

35

of 6

3

Po

int

Rat

ed C

rite

ria

Des

cri

pti

on

P

oin

t A

lloc

atio

n

d)

The

Pro

ject

Va

lue8

(CA

D$

); a

nd

e)

Sen

ior

Clie

nt

Ref

eren

ce9

deta

ils,

incl

udin

g na

me,

title

, te

lep

hon

e n

umbe

r an

d em

ail a

ddre

ss.

All

item

s (a

) –

(e)

abov

e sh

ould

be

pro

vide

d fo

r th

e R

efe

ren

ce P

roje

ct6

to b

e co

nsid

ere

d fo

r ev

alua

tion.

0

po

ints

: T

he p

ropo

sed

reso

urce

has

less

than

12

mon

ths

of e

xper

ienc

e in

the

last

120

mon

ths

prec

edin

g th

e da

te o

f the

bid

pos

ting.

2)

The

Bid

der

sho

uld

dem

onst

rate

that

the

pro

pose

d r

eso

urce

has

impl

emen

ted

thre

e (3

) S

AP

Fin

anci

als

So

luti

on

10 p

roje

cts,

in t

he la

st 1

20 m

onth

s pr

eced

ing

the

date

of t

he b

id p

ostin

g, w

hich

re

quir

ed in

tegr

atio

n w

ith m

ultip

le n

on-

SA

P

syst

ems.

To

dem

onst

rate

this

exp

erie

nce

, the

Bid

der

shou

ld id

entif

y R

efer

ence

P

roje

cts

6 in

the

pro

pose

d re

sour

ce’s

res

ume.

The

Ref

eren

ce P

roje

ct6

deta

ils

shou

ld in

clud

e:

a)

Nam

e of

the

clie

nt o

rgan

iza

tion;

b)

T

he s

tart

and

end

dat

es, a

nd

dura

tion

(in m

onth

s) th

e p

ropo

sed

PD

L w

orke

d on

the

proj

ect;

c)

A d

escr

iptio

n of

the

prop

osed

PD

L’s

role

and

res

pons

ibili

ties;

d)

T

he P

roje

ct V

alu

e8 ($

CA

D);

and

e)

S

enio

r C

lien

t R

efer

ence

9 de

tails

, in

clud

ing

nam

e, ti

tle, t

ele

pho

ne

num

ber

and

emai

l add

ress

. A

ll ite

ms

(a)

– (e

) ab

ove

shou

ld b

e p

rovi

ded

for

the

Re

fere

nce

Pro

ject

6 to

be

cons

ider

ed

for

eval

uatio

n.

Up

to

15

po

ints

, as

follo

ws:

15

po

ints

: T

he p

rop

osed

res

ourc

e ha

s im

plem

ente

d th

ree

(3)

SA

P F

inan

cial

s S

olu

tio

n10

pr

ojec

ts, i

n th

e la

st 1

20 m

onth

s pr

eced

ing

the

date

of t

he b

id p

ostin

g, w

hich

req

uire

d in

tegr

atio

n w

ith m

ultip

le n

on-

SA

P s

yste

ms,

of w

hich

one

(1)

pr

ojec

t is

an S

AP

S/4

HA

NA

Im

ple

men

tati

on

11 .

10

po

ints

: T

he p

rop

osed

res

ourc

e ha

s im

plem

ente

d th

ree

(3)

SA

P F

inan

cial

s S

olu

tio

n10

pr

ojec

ts, i

n th

e la

st 1

20 m

onth

s pr

eced

ing

the

date

of t

he b

id p

ostin

g, w

hich

req

uire

d in

tegr

atio

n w

ith m

ultip

le n

on-

SA

P s

yste

ms.

5

po

ints

: T

he p

ropo

sed

reso

urce

has

im

plem

ente

d be

twee

n o

ne (

1) o

r tw

o (2

) S

AP

F

inan

cial

s S

olu

tio

n10

pro

ject

s, in

the

last

120

m

onth

s pr

eced

ing

the

dat

e of

the

bid

pos

ting,

w

hich

re

quir

ed in

tegr

atio

n w

ith m

ultip

le n

on-

SA

P

leg

acy

syst

ems.

0

po

ints

: T

he p

ropo

sed

reso

urce

has

im

plem

ente

d ze

ro (

0) S

AP

Fin

anci

als

So

luti

on

10

proj

ects

, in

the

last

120

mon

ths

prec

edin

g th

e da

te o

f the

bid

pos

ting,

whi

ch r

equi

red

inte

grat

ion

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

36

of 6

3

Po

int

Rat

ed C

rite

ria

Des

cri

pti

on

P

oin

t A

lloc

atio

n

with

mul

tiple

no

n-S

AP

sys

tem

s.

3)

The

Bid

der

sho

uld

dem

onst

rate

that

the

pro

pose

d r

eso

urce

hol

ds a

val

id P

roje

ct

Man

agem

ent P

rofe

ssio

nal (

PM

P),

or

Info

rmat

ion

Tec

hno

log

y In

fras

truc

ture

Li

brar

y (I

TIL

), o

r P

RIN

CE

2 ce

rtifi

catio

n.

Up

to

10

po

ints

, as

follo

ws:

10

po

ints

: T

he p

rop

osed

res

ourc

e ho

lds

a v

alid

P

roje

ct M

anag

emen

t Pro

fess

iona

l (P

MP

), o

r In

form

atio

n T

ech

nolo

gy

Infr

astr

uctu

re L

ibra

ry

(IT

IL),

or

PR

INC

E2

cert

ifica

tion.

0

po

ints

: T

he p

ropo

sed

reso

urce

doe

s no

t hol

d a

valid

Pro

ject

Man

agem

ent

Pro

fess

iona

l (P

MP

), o

r In

form

atio

n T

ech

nolo

gy

Infr

astr

uctu

re L

ibra

ry

(IT

IL),

or

PR

INC

E2

cert

ifica

tion.

4)

The

Bid

der

sho

uld

dem

onst

rate

that

the

pro

pose

d r

eso

urce

has

com

plet

ed

accr

edite

d A

gile

Met

hod

olo

gy

trai

nin

g (e

.g.,

SA

P A

ctiv

ate

Met

hod

olo

gy

trai

nin

g,

Scr

um M

aste

r tr

ain

ing)

.

Up

to

5 p

oin

ts, a

s fo

llow

s:

5

po

ints

: T

he p

ropo

sed

reso

urce

has

com

plet

ed

accr

edite

d A

gile

Met

hod

olo

gy

trai

nin

gs.

0

po

ints

: T

he p

ropo

sed

reso

urce

has

not

co

mpl

ete

d ac

cred

ited

Agi

le M

eth

odol

ogy

trai

ning

s.

Max

imu

m A

vaila

ble

Po

ints

50

Min

imu

m P

oin

ts R

equ

ired

30

No

te:

Bid

s th

at d

o n

ot

me

et t

he

abo

ve M

inim

um

Po

ints

Req

uir

e w

ill b

e f

ou

nd

no

n-r

esp

on

sive

.

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

37

of 6

3

R3.

2.2

Bus

ines

s T

rans

form

atio

n Le

ad (

50 p

oint

s)

Po

int

Rat

ed C

rite

ria

Des

cri

pti

on

P

oin

t A

lloc

atio

n

1)

The

Bid

der

sho

uld

dem

onst

rate

that

the

pro

pose

d r

eso

urce

’s e

xper

ienc

e in

the

72

mon

ths

prec

edin

g th

e d

ate

of th

e bi

d p

ostin

g, a

s th

e B

usin

ess

Tra

nsfo

rmat

ion

Lead

(B

TL)

res

pons

ible

for

Lar

ge

Sca

le T

ech

no

log

y E

nab

led

P

roje

cts

7 . T

o de

mon

stra

te th

is e

xper

ienc

e, th

e B

idde

r sh

ould

iden

tify

Ref

eren

ce P

roje

cts

6 in

the

pro

pose

d re

sour

ce’s

res

ume.

The

Ref

eren

ce

Pro

ject

6 d

eta

ils s

houl

d in

clud

e:

a)

Nam

e of

the

clie

nt o

rgan

iza

tion;

b)

T

he s

tart

and

end

dat

es, a

nd

dura

tion

(in m

onth

s) th

e p

ropo

sed

BT

L w

orke

d on

the

proj

ect;

c)

A d

escr

iptio

n of

the

prop

osed

BT

L’s

role

and

res

pon

sibi

litie

s;

d)

The

Pro

ject

Va

lue8

(CA

D$

); a

nd

e)

Sen

ior

Clie

nt

Ref

eren

ce9

deta

ils,

incl

udin

g na

me,

title

, te

lep

hon

e n

umbe

r an

d em

ail a

ddre

ss.

All

item

s (a

) –

(e)

abov

e sh

ould

be

pro

vide

d fo

r th

e R

efe

ren

ce P

roje

ct6

to b

e co

nsid

ere

d fo

r ev

alua

tion.

Up

to

20

po

ints

, as

follo

ws:

20

po

ints

: T

he p

rop

osed

res

ourc

e ha

s a

min

imum

of 3

6 m

onth

s of

exp

erie

nce

in th

e 7

2 m

onth

s pr

eced

ing

the

dat

e of

the

bid

pos

ting.

10

po

ints

: T

he p

rop

osed

res

ourc

e ha

s a

betw

een

12 m

onth

s an

d 3

5 m

onth

s of

exp

erie

nce

in th

e

last

72

mon

ths

prec

edin

g th

e da

te o

f the

bid

po

stin

g.

0

po

ints

: T

he p

ropo

sed

reso

urce

has

less

than

12

mon

ths

of e

xper

ienc

e in

the

last

72

mon

ths

prec

edin

g th

e da

te o

f the

bid

pos

ting.

2)

The

Bid

der

sho

uld

dem

onst

rate

that

the

pro

pose

d r

eso

urce

’s e

xper

ienc

e in

the

72

mon

ths

prec

edin

g th

e d

ate

of th

e bi

d p

ostin

g, a

s th

e B

usin

ess

Tra

nsfo

rmat

ion

Lead

(B

TL)

res

pons

ible

for

prov

idin

g co

nsul

ting

serv

ices

to c

lient

or

gani

zatio

ns in

the

dom

ain

of F

inan

cial

Ma

nag

emen

t and

Acc

ount

ing.

To

dem

onst

rate

this

exp

erie

nce,

the

Bid

der

shou

ld id

entif

y R

efe

ren

ce P

roje

cts6

in

the

prop

osed

res

ourc

e’s

resu

me.

The

Ref

eren

ce P

roje

ct6

det

ails

sho

uld

incl

ude

:

a)

Nam

e of

the

clie

nt o

rgan

iza

tion;

b)

T

he s

tart

and

end

dat

es, a

nd

dura

tion

(in m

onth

s) th

e p

ropo

sed

BT

L w

orke

d on

the

proj

ect;

Up

to

20

po

ints

, as

follo

ws:

20

po

ints

: T

he p

rop

osed

res

ourc

e ha

s a

min

imum

of 3

6 m

onth

s of

exp

erie

nce

in th

e 7

2 m

onth

s pr

eced

ing

the

dat

e of

the

bid

pos

ting.

10

po

ints

: T

he p

rop

osed

res

ourc

e ha

s a

betw

een

12 m

onth

s an

d 3

5 m

onth

s of

exp

erie

nce

in th

e

last

72

mon

ths

prec

edin

g th

e da

te o

f the

bid

po

stin

g.

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

38

of 6

3

Po

int

Rat

ed C

rite

ria

Des

cri

pti

on

P

oin

t A

lloc

atio

n

c)

A d

escr

iptio

n of

the

prop

osed

BT

L’s

role

and

res

pon

sibi

litie

s;

d)

The

Pro

ject

Va

lue8

(CA

D$

); a

nd

e)

Sen

ior

Clie

nt

Ref

eren

ce9

deta

ils,

incl

udin

g na

me,

title

, te

lep

hon

e n

umbe

r an

d em

ail a

ddre

ss.

All

item

s (a

) –

(e)

abov

e sh

ould

be

pro

vide

d fo

r th

e R

efe

ren

ce P

roje

ct6

to b

e co

nsid

ere

d fo

r ev

alua

tion.

0

po

ints

: T

he p

ropo

sed

reso

urce

has

less

than

12

mon

ths

of e

xper

ienc

e in

the

last

72

mon

ths

prec

edin

g th

e da

te o

f the

bid

pos

ting.

3)

The

Bid

der

sho

uld

dem

onst

rate

that

the

pro

pose

d r

eso

urce

’s e

xper

ienc

e in

the

72

mon

ths

prec

edin

g th

e d

ate

of th

e bi

d p

ostin

g, a

s th

e B

usin

ess

Tra

nsfo

rmat

ion

Lead

(B

TL)

res

pons

ible

for

Lar

ge

Sca

le T

ech

no

log

y E

nab

led

P

roje

cts

7 , w

hich

util

ized

an

Ent

erpr

ise

Res

ourc

e P

lann

ing

(ER

P)

solu

tion.

To

de

mon

stra

te th

is e

xper

ienc

e, th

e B

idde

r sh

ould

iden

tify

Ref

ere

nce

Pro

ject

s6 in

th

e pr

opos

ed r

esou

rce’

s re

sum

e. T

he R

efer

ence

Pro

ject

6 d

eta

ils s

houl

d in

clu

de:

a)

Nam

e of

the

clie

nt o

rgan

iza

tion;

b)

T

he s

tart

and

end

dat

es, a

nd

dura

tion

(in m

onth

s) th

e p

ropo

sed

BT

L w

orke

d on

the

proj

ect;

c)

A d

escr

iptio

n of

the

prop

osed

BT

L’s

role

and

res

pon

sibi

litie

s;

d)

The

Pro

ject

Va

lue8

(CA

D$

); a

nd

e)

Sen

ior

Clie

nt

Ref

eren

ce9

deta

ils,

incl

udin

g na

me,

title

, te

lep

hon

e n

umbe

r an

d em

ail a

ddre

ss.

All

item

s (a

) –

(e)

abov

e sh

ould

be

pro

vide

d fo

r th

e R

efe

ren

ce P

roje

ct6

to b

e co

nsid

ere

d fo

r ev

alua

tion.

Up

to

10

po

ints

, as

follo

ws:

10

po

ints

: T

he p

rop

osed

res

ourc

e ha

s a

min

imum

of 3

6 m

onth

s of

exp

erie

nce

in th

e 7

2 m

onth

s pr

eced

ing

the

dat

e of

the

bid

pos

ting.

5

po

ints

: T

he p

ropo

sed

reso

urce

has

a b

etw

een

12

mon

ths

and

35

mon

ths

of e

xper

ienc

e in

the

la

st 7

2 m

onth

s pr

eced

ing

the

date

of t

he b

id

post

ing.

0

po

ints

: T

he p

ropo

sed

reso

urce

has

less

than

12

mon

ths

of e

xper

ienc

e in

the

last

72

mon

ths

prec

edin

g th

e da

te o

f the

bid

pos

ting.

Max

imu

m A

vaila

ble

Po

ints

50

Min

imu

m P

oin

ts R

equ

ired

30

No

te:

Bid

s th

at d

o n

ot

me

et t

he

abo

ve M

inim

um

Po

ints

Req

uir

e w

ill b

e f

ou

nd

no

n-r

esp

on

sive

.

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

39

of 6

3

R3.

2.3

Sol

utio

n A

rchi

tect

Lea

d (5

0 p

oin

ts)

Po

int

Rat

ed C

rite

ria

Des

cri

pti

on

P

oin

t A

lloc

atio

n

1)

The

Bid

der

sho

uld

dem

onst

rate

that

the

pro

pose

d r

eso

urce

’s e

xper

ienc

e in

the

72

mon

ths

prec

edin

g th

e d

ate

of th

e bi

d p

ostin

g, a

s th

e S

olut

ion

Arc

hite

ct L

ead

(SA

L) r

esp

onsi

ble

for

Lar

ge

Sca

le T

ech

no

log

y E

nab

led

Pro

ject

s7 .

To

dem

onst

rate

this

exp

erie

nce,

the

Bid

der

shou

ld id

entif

y R

efe

ren

ce P

roje

cts6

in

the

prop

osed

res

ourc

e’s

resu

me.

The

Ref

eren

ce P

roje

ct6

det

ails

sho

uld

incl

ude

:

a)

Nam

e of

the

clie

nt o

rgan

iza

tion;

b)

T

he s

tart

and

end

dat

es, a

nd

dura

tion

(in m

onth

s) th

e p

ropo

sed

SA

L w

orke

d on

the

proj

ect;

c)

A d

escr

iptio

n of

the

prop

osed

SA

L’s

rol

e a

nd r

esp

onsi

bilit

ies;

d)

T

he P

roje

ct V

alu

e8 (C

AD

$);

and

e)

S

enio

r C

lien

t R

efer

ence

9 de

tails

, in

clud

ing

nam

e, ti

tle, t

ele

pho

ne

num

ber

and

emai

l add

ress

. A

ll ite

ms

(a)

– (e

) ab

ove

shou

ld b

e p

rovi

ded

for

the

Re

fere

nce

Pro

ject

6 to

be

cons

ider

ed

for

eval

uatio

n.

Up

to

20

po

ints

, as

follo

ws:

20

po

ints

: T

he p

rop

osed

res

ourc

e ha

s a

min

imum

of 3

6 m

onth

s of

exp

erie

nce

in th

e 7

2 m

onth

s pr

eced

ing

the

dat

e of

the

bid

pos

ting.

10

po

ints

: T

he p

rop

osed

res

ourc

e ha

s a

betw

een

12 m

onth

s an

d 3

5 m

onth

s of

exp

erie

nce

in th

e

last

72

mon

ths

prec

edin

g th

e da

te o

f the

bid

po

stin

g.

0

po

ints

: T

he p

ropo

sed

reso

urce

has

less

than

12

mon

ths

of e

xper

ienc

e in

the

last

72

mon

ths

prec

edin

g th

e da

te o

f the

bid

pos

ting.

2)

The

Bid

der

sho

uld

dem

onst

rate

that

the

pro

pose

d r

eso

urce

’s e

xper

ienc

e in

the

72

mon

ths

prec

edin

g th

e d

ate

of th

e bi

d p

ostin

g, a

s th

e S

olut

ion

Arc

hite

ct L

ead

(SA

L) r

esp

onsi

ble

for

SA

P F

inan

cial

s S

olu

tio

n10

pro

ject

s. T

o de

mon

stra

te t

his

exp

erie

nce,

the

Bid

der

sho

uld

iden

tify

Ref

ere

nc

e P

roje

cts

6 in

the

pro

pose

d re

sour

ce’s

res

ume.

The

Ref

eren

ce

Pro

ject

6 d

eta

ils s

hou

ld in

clu

de:

a)

Nam

e of

the

clie

nt o

rgan

iza

tion;

b)

T

he s

tart

and

end

dat

es, a

nd

dura

tion

(in m

onth

s) th

e p

ropo

sed

SA

L w

orke

d on

the

proj

ect;

Up

to

20

po

ints

, as

follo

ws:

20

po

ints

: T

he p

rop

osed

res

ourc

e ha

s a

min

imum

of 2

4 m

onth

s of

exp

erie

nce

in th

e 7

2 m

onth

s pr

eced

ing

the

dat

e of

the

bid

pos

ting.

10

po

ints

: T

he p

rop

osed

res

ourc

e ha

s a

betw

een

12 m

onth

s an

d 2

3 m

onth

s of

exp

erie

nce

in th

e

last

72

mon

ths

prec

edin

g th

e da

te o

f the

bid

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

40

of 6

3

Po

int

Rat

ed C

rite

ria

Des

cri

pti

on

P

oin

t A

lloc

atio

n

c)

A d

escr

iptio

n of

the

prop

osed

SA

L’s

rol

e a

nd r

esp

onsi

bilit

ies;

d)

T

he P

roje

ct V

alu

e8 (C

AD

$);

and

e)

S

enio

r C

lien

t R

efer

ence

9 de

tails

, in

clud

ing

nam

e, ti

tle, t

ele

pho

ne

num

ber

and

emai

l add

ress

. A

ll ite

ms

(a)

– (e

) ab

ove

shou

ld b

e p

rovi

ded

for

the

Re

fere

nce

Pro

ject

6 to

be

cons

ider

ed

for

eval

uatio

n.

post

ing.

0

po

ints

: T

he p

ropo

sed

reso

urce

has

less

than

12

mon

ths

of e

xper

ienc

e in

the

last

72

mon

ths

prec

edin

g th

e da

te o

f the

bid

pos

ting.

3)

The

Bid

der

sho

uld

dem

onst

rate

that

the

pro

pose

d r

eso

urce

’s e

xper

ienc

e in

the

72

mon

ths

prec

edin

g th

e d

ate

of th

e bi

d p

ostin

g, a

s th

e S

olut

ion

Arc

hite

ct L

ead

(SA

L) r

esp

onsi

ble

for

SA

P S

/4H

AN

A Im

ple

men

tati

on

11 p

roje

cts.

To

dem

onst

rate

this

exp

erie

nce,

the

Bid

der

shou

ld id

entif

y R

efe

ren

ce P

roje

cts6

in

the

prop

osed

res

ourc

e’s

resu

me.

The

Ref

eren

ce P

roje

ct6

det

ails

sho

uld

incl

ude

:

a)

Nam

e of

the

clie

nt o

rgan

iza

tion;

b)

T

he s

tart

and

end

dat

es, a

nd

dura

tion

(in m

onth

s) th

e p

ropo

sed

SA

L w

orke

d on

the

proj

ect;

c)

A d

escr

iptio

n of

the

prop

osed

SA

L’s

rol

e a

nd r

esp

onsi

bilit

ies;

d)

T

he P

roje

ct V

alu

e8 (C

AD

$);

and

e)

S

enio

r C

lien

t R

efer

ence

9 de

tails

, in

clud

ing

nam

e, ti

tle, t

ele

pho

ne

num

ber

and

emai

l add

ress

. A

ll ite

ms

(a)

– (e

) ab

ove

shou

ld b

e p

rovi

ded

for

the

Re

fere

nce

Pro

ject

6 to

be

cons

ider

ed

for

eval

uatio

n.

Up

to

10

po

ints

, as

follo

ws:

10

po

ints

: T

he p

rop

osed

res

ourc

e ha

s a

min

imum

of 1

2 m

onth

s of

exp

erie

nce

in th

e 7

2 m

onth

s pr

eced

ing

the

dat

e of

the

bid

pos

ting.

0

po

ints

: T

he p

ropo

sed

reso

urce

has

less

than

12

mon

ths

of e

xper

ienc

e in

the

last

72

mon

ths

prec

edin

g th

e da

te o

f the

bid

pos

ting.

Max

imu

m A

vaila

ble

Po

ints

50

Min

imu

m P

oin

ts R

equ

ired

30

No

te:

Bid

s th

at d

o n

ot

me

et t

he

abo

ve M

inim

um

Po

ints

Req

uir

e w

ill b

e f

ou

nd

no

n-r

esp

on

sive

.

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

41

of 6

3

R3.

2.4

Tec

hnic

al L

ead

(5

0 po

ints

)

Po

int

Rat

ed C

rite

ria

Des

cri

pti

on

P

oin

t A

lloc

atio

n

1)

The

Bid

der

sho

uld

dem

onst

rate

that

the

pro

pose

d r

eso

urce

’s p

roje

ct e

xper

ienc

e

in t

he 6

0 m

onth

s pr

eced

ing

the

date

of t

he b

id p

ostin

g, a

s th

e T

echn

ica

l Lea

d (T

L) r

espo

nsib

le f

or o

vera

ll S

yste

ms

Inte

gra

tio

n12

. T

o de

mon

stra

te th

is

exp

erie

nce,

the

Bid

der

sho

uld

iden

tify

Ref

ere

nc

e P

roje

cts

6 in

the

pro

pose

d re

sour

ce’s

res

ume.

The

Ref

eren

ce

Pro

ject

6 d

eta

ils s

hou

ld in

clu

de:

a)

Nam

e of

the

clie

nt o

rgan

iza

tion;

b)

T

he s

tart

and

end

dat

es, a

nd

dura

tion

(in m

onth

s) th

e p

ropo

sed

TL

wor

ked

on

the

proj

ect;

c)

A d

escr

iptio

n of

the

prop

osed

TL’

s ro

le a

nd

resp

ons

ibili

ties;

d)

T

he s

trat

egi

es,

deci

sion

s, t

echn

ique

s, a

nd t

echn

olog

ies

that

the

TL

leve

rag

ed t

o ov

erco

me

Sys

tem

s In

teg

rati

on

12

chal

len

ges;

an

d e)

S

enio

r C

lien

t R

efer

ence

9 de

tails

, in

clud

ing

nam

e, ti

tle, t

ele

pho

ne

num

ber

and

emai

l add

ress

. A

ll ite

ms

(a)

– (e

) ab

ove

shou

ld b

e p

rovi

ded

for

this

ele

men

t to

be c

ons

ider

ed “

met

”.

Up

to

10

po

ints

, as

follo

ws:

10

po

ints

: T

he p

rop

osed

res

ourc

e ha

s a

min

imum

of 3

6 m

onth

s of

exp

erie

nce

in th

e 6

0 m

onth

s pr

eced

ing

the

dat

e of

the

bid

pos

ting.

5

po

ints

: T

he p

ropo

sed

reso

urce

has

a b

etw

een

24

mon

ths

and

35

mon

ths

of e

xper

ienc

e in

the

60

mon

ths

prec

edin

g th

e d

ate

of th

e b

id p

ostin

g.

0

po

ints

: T

he p

ropo

sed

reso

urce

has

less

than

24

mon

ths

of e

xper

ienc

e in

the

last

60

mon

ths

prec

edin

g th

e da

te o

f the

bid

pos

ting.

2)

The

Bid

der

sho

uld

dem

onst

rate

that

the

pro

pose

d r

eso

urce

has

impl

emen

ted

thre

e (3

) S

AP

Fin

anci

als

So

luti

on

10 p

roje

cts,

in t

he la

st 6

0 m

onth

s pr

eced

ing

the

date

of t

he b

id p

ostin

g, w

hich

re

quir

ed in

tegr

atio

n w

ith m

ultip

le n

on-

SA

P

syst

ems.

To

dem

onst

rate

this

exp

erie

nce

, the

Bid

der

shou

ld id

entif

y R

efer

ence

P

roje

cts

6 in

the

pro

pose

d re

sour

ce’s

res

ume.

The

Ref

eren

ce P

roje

ct6

deta

ils

shou

ld in

clud

e:

a)

Nam

e of

the

clie

nt o

rgan

iza

tion;

b)

T

he s

tart

and

end

dat

es, a

nd

dura

tion

(in m

onth

s) th

e p

ropo

sed

TL

wor

ked

on

the

proj

ect;

c)

A d

escr

iptio

n of

the

prop

osed

TL’

s ro

le a

nd

resp

ons

ibili

ties;

d)

T

he s

trat

egi

es,

deci

sion

s, t

echn

ique

s, a

nd t

echn

olog

ies

that

the

TL

Up

to

20

po

ints

, as

follo

ws:

20

po

ints

: T

he p

rop

osed

res

ourc

e ha

s S

yste

ms

Inte

gra

tio

n1

2 e

xper

ienc

e g

ain

ed fr

om th

ree

(3)

SA

P F

inan

cial

s S

olu

tio

n10

pro

ject

s, in

the

last

60

mon

ths

prec

edin

g th

e d

ate

of th

e b

id p

ostin

g,

whi

ch r

equ

ired

inte

grat

ion

with

mul

tiple

no

n-S

AP

sy

stem

s, o

f whi

ch o

ne

(1)

pro

ject

is a

n S

AP

S

/4H

AN

A Im

ple

men

tati

on

11,

and

one

(1)

proj

ect

incl

uded

inte

gra

tion

with

se

rvic

es d

eplo

yed

on a

M

icro

soft

Azu

re c

loud

infr

ast

ruct

ure.

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

42

of 6

3

Po

int

Rat

ed C

rite

ria

Des

cri

pti

on

P

oin

t A

lloc

atio

n

leve

rag

ed t

o ov

erco

me

Sys

tem

s In

teg

rati

on

12

chal

len

ges;

an

de)

S

enio

r C

lien

t R

efer

ence

9 de

tails

, in

clud

ing

nam

e, ti

tle, t

ele

pho

ne

num

ber

and

emai

l add

ress

. A

ll ite

ms

(a)

– (e

) ab

ove

shou

ld b

e p

rovi

ded

for

this

ele

men

t to

be c

ons

ider

ed “

met

”.

15

po

ints

: T

he p

rop

osed

res

ourc

e ha

s S

yste

ms

Inte

gra

tio

n1

2 e

xper

ienc

e g

ain

ed fr

om o

ne (

1) o

r tw

o (2

) S

AP

Fin

anci

als

So

luti

on

10 p

roje

cts,

in t

he

last

60

mon

ths

prec

edin

g th

e da

te o

f the

bid

po

stin

g, w

hich

req

uire

d in

tegr

atio

n w

ith m

ultip

le

non-

SA

P s

yste

ms,

of w

hich

one

(1)

pro

ject

is a

n S

AP

S/4

HA

NA

Imp

lem

enta

tio

n11

, an

d o

ne (

1)

proj

ect i

nclu

ded

inte

grat

ion

with

ser

vice

s de

plo

yed

on a

Mic

roso

ft A

zure

clo

ud in

fras

truc

ture

.

10

po

ints

: T

he p

rop

osed

res

ourc

e ha

s S

yste

ms

Inte

gra

tio

n1

2 e

xper

ienc

e g

ain

ed fr

om o

ne (

1) o

r tw

o (2

) S

AP

Fin

anci

als

So

luti

on

10 p

roje

cts,

in t

he

last

60

mon

ths

prec

edin

g th

e da

te o

f the

bid

po

stin

g, w

hich

req

uire

d in

tegr

atio

n w

ith m

ultip

le

non-

SA

P s

yste

ms,

of w

hich

one

(1)

pro

ject

is a

n S

AP

S/4

HA

NA

Im

ple

men

tati

on

11 ,

or

one

(1)

proj

ect i

nclu

ded

inte

grat

ion

with

ser

vice

s de

plo

yed

on a

Mic

roso

ft A

zure

clo

ud in

fras

truc

ture

.

5

po

ints

: T

he p

ropo

sed

reso

urce

has

Sys

tem

s In

teg

rati

on

12

exp

erie

nce

gai

ned

from

thre

e (3

) pr

ojec

ts, i

n th

e la

st 6

0 m

onth

s pr

eced

ing

the

date

of

the

bid

pos

ting,

whi

ch r

equ

ired

inte

grat

ion

with

m

ultip

le n

on-S

AP

sys

tem

s, o

f wh

ich

one

(1)

proj

ect i

nclu

ded

inte

grat

ion

with

ser

vice

s de

plo

yed

on a

Mic

roso

ft A

zure

clo

ud in

fras

truc

ture

.

0

po

ints

: T

he p

ropo

sed

reso

urce

has

no

Sys

tem

s In

teg

rati

on

12 e

xper

ienc

e ga

ine

d fr

om

eith

er a

n S

AP

Fin

anci

als

So

luti

on

10 p

roje

ct, o

r fr

om a

pro

ject

whi

ch in

clud

ed in

tegr

atio

n w

ith

serv

ices

dep

loye

d on

a M

icro

soft

Azu

re c

loud

in

fras

truc

ture

, in

the

last

60

mon

ths

prec

edin

g th

e

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

43

of 6

3

Po

int

Rat

ed C

rite

ria

Des

cri

pti

on

P

oin

t A

lloc

atio

n

date

of t

he b

id p

ostin

g, w

hich

req

uire

d in

tegr

atio

n w

ith m

ultip

le n

on-

SA

P s

yste

ms.

3)

The

Bid

der

sho

uld

dem

onst

rate

that

the

pro

pose

d r

eso

urce

hol

ds a

val

id

Mic

roso

ft A

zure

cer

tific

atio

n.

Up

to

15

po

ints

, as

follo

ws:

15

po

ints

: T

he p

rop

osed

res

ourc

e ho

lds

a v

alid

M

icro

soft

Azu

re c

ertif

icat

ion

at th

e E

xper

t le

vel.

10

po

ints

: T

he p

rop

osed

res

ourc

e ho

lds

a v

alid

M

icro

soft

Azu

re c

ertif

icat

ion

at th

e A

ssoc

iate

leve

l.

5

po

ints

: T

he p

ropo

sed

reso

urce

hol

ds a

val

id

Mic

roso

ft A

zure

cer

tific

atio

n at

the

Fu

ndam

enta

ls

leve

l.

0

po

ints

: T

he p

ropo

sed

reso

urce

doe

s no

t hol

d a

valid

Mic

roso

ft A

zure

cer

tific

atio

n a

t an

y le

vel.

4)

The

Bid

der

sho

uld

dem

onst

rate

that

the

pro

pose

d r

eso

urce

has

com

plet

ed

accr

edite

d A

gile

Met

hod

olo

gy

trai

nin

g (e

.g.,

SA

P A

ctiv

ate

Met

hod

olo

gy

trai

nin

g,

Scr

um M

aste

r tr

ain

ing)

.

Up

to

5 p

oin

ts, a

s fo

llow

s:

5

po

ints

: T

he p

ropo

sed

reso

urce

has

com

plet

ed

accr

edite

d A

gile

Met

hod

olo

gy

trai

nin

gs.

0

po

ints

: T

he p

ropo

sed

reso

urce

has

not

co

mpl

ete

d ac

cred

ited

Agi

le M

eth

odol

ogy

trai

ning

s.

Max

imu

m A

vaila

ble

Po

ints

50

Min

imu

m P

oin

ts R

equ

ired

30

No

te:

Bid

s th

at d

o n

ot

me

et t

he

abo

ve M

inim

um

Po

ints

Req

uir

e w

ill b

e f

ou

nd

no

n-r

esp

on

sive

.

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

44

of 6

3

R3.

2.5

Ch

ang

e M

anag

emen

t Le

ad (

50

poin

ts)

Po

int

Rat

ed C

rite

ria

Des

cri

pti

on

P

oin

t A

lloc

atio

n

1)

The

Bid

der

sho

uld

dem

onst

rate

that

the

pro

pose

d r

eso

urce

’s e

xper

ienc

e in

the

12

0 m

onth

s pr

eced

ing

the

date

of t

he b

id p

ostin

g, a

s th

e C

han

ge M

anag

emen

t Le

ad (

CM

L) r

esp

onsi

ble

for

Lar

ge

Sca

le T

ech

no

log

y E

nab

led

Pro

ject

s7 .

To

dem

onst

rate

this

exp

erie

nce,

the

Bid

der

shou

ld id

entif

y R

efe

ren

ce P

roje

cts6

in

the

prop

osed

res

ourc

e’s

resu

me.

The

Ref

eren

ce P

roje

ct6

det

ails

sho

uld

incl

ude

:

a)

Nam

e of

the

clie

nt o

rgan

iza

tion;

b)

T

he s

tart

and

end

dat

es, a

nd

dura

tion

(in m

onth

s) th

e p

ropo

sed

CM

L w

orke

d o

n th

e pr

ojec

t; c)

A

des

crip

tion

of th

e pr

opos

ed C

ML’

s ro

le a

nd r

espo

nsib

ilitie

s;

d)

The

Pro

ject

Va

lue8

(CA

D$

); a

nd

e)

Sen

ior

Clie

nt

Ref

eren

ce9

deta

ils,

incl

udin

g na

me,

title

, te

lep

hon

e n

umbe

r an

d em

ail a

ddre

ss.

All

item

s (a

) –

(e)

abov

e sh

ould

be

pro

vide

d fo

r th

e R

efe

ren

ce P

roje

ct6

to b

e co

nsid

ere

d fo

r ev

alua

tion.

Up

to

20

po

ints

, as

follo

ws:

20

po

ints

: T

he p

rop

osed

res

ourc

e ha

s a

min

imum

of 6

0 m

onth

s of

exp

erie

nce

in th

e 1

20

mon

ths

prec

edin

g th

e d

ate

of th

e b

id p

ostin

g.

10

po

ints

: T

he p

rop

osed

res

ourc

e ha

s a

betw

een

12 m

onth

s an

d 5

9 m

onth

s of

exp

erie

nce

in th

e

last

120

mon

ths

prec

edin

g th

e d

ate

of t

he b

id

post

ing.

0

po

ints

: T

he p

ropo

sed

reso

urce

has

less

than

12

mon

ths

of e

xper

ienc

e in

the

last

120

mon

ths

prec

edin

g th

e da

te o

f the

bid

pos

ting.

2)

The

Bid

der

sho

uld

dem

onst

rate

that

the

pro

pose

d r

eso

urce

’s e

xper

ienc

e in

the

12

0 m

onth

s pr

eced

ing

the

date

of t

he b

id p

ostin

g, a

s th

e C

han

ge M

anag

emen

t Le

ad (

CM

L) r

esp

onsi

ble

for

Lar

ge

Sca

le T

ech

no

log

y E

nab

led

Pro

ject

s7 ,

w

hich

util

ized

an

Ent

erpr

ise

Res

ourc

e P

lann

ing

(E

RP

) so

lutio

n. T

o d

emon

stra

te

this

exp

erie

nce,

the

Bid

der

shou

ld id

entif

y R

efer

ence

Pro

ject

s6

in th

e pr

opos

ed

reso

urce

’s r

esum

e. T

he R

efer

enc

e P

roje

ct6

det

ails

sho

uld

incl

ude

:

a)

Nam

e of

the

clie

nt o

rgan

iza

tion;

b)

T

he s

tart

and

end

dat

es, a

nd

dura

tion

(in m

onth

s) th

e p

ropo

sed

CM

L w

orke

d o

n th

e pr

ojec

t; c)

A

des

crip

tion

of th

e pr

opos

ed C

ML’

s ro

le a

nd r

espo

nsib

ilitie

s;

d)

The

Pro

ject

Va

lue8

(CA

D$

); a

nd

e)

Sen

ior

Clie

nt

Ref

eren

ce9

deta

ils,

incl

udin

g na

me,

title

, te

lep

hon

e n

umbe

r

Up

to

20

po

ints

, as

follo

ws:

20

po

ints

: T

he p

rop

osed

res

ourc

e ha

s a

min

imum

of 3

6 m

onth

s of

exp

erie

nce

in th

e 1

20

mon

ths

prec

edin

g th

e d

ate

of th

e b

id p

ostin

g.

10

po

ints

: T

he p

rop

osed

res

ourc

e ha

s a

betw

een

12 m

onth

s an

d 3

5 m

onth

s of

exp

erie

nce

in th

e

last

120

mon

ths

prec

edin

g th

e d

ate

of t

he b

id

post

ing.

0

po

ints

: T

he p

ropo

sed

reso

urce

has

less

than

12

mon

ths

of e

xper

ienc

e in

the

last

120

mon

ths

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

45

of 6

3

Po

int

Rat

ed C

rite

ria

Des

cri

pti

on

P

oin

t A

lloc

atio

n

and

emai

l add

ress

. A

ll ite

ms

(a)

– (e

) ab

ove

shou

ld b

e p

rovi

ded

for

the

Re

fere

nce

Pro

ject

6 to

be

cons

ider

ed

for

eval

uatio

n.

prec

edin

g th

e da

te o

f the

bid

pos

ting.

3)

The

Bid

der

sho

uld

dem

onst

rate

that

the

pro

pose

d r

eso

urce

’s e

xper

ienc

e in

the

12

0 m

onth

s pr

eced

ing

the

date

of t

he b

id p

ostin

g, a

s th

e C

han

ge M

anag

emen

t Le

ad (

CM

L) r

esp

onsi

ble

for

SA

P F

inan

cial

s S

olu

tio

n10

pro

ject

s. T

o de

mon

stra

te th

is e

xper

ienc

e, th

e B

idde

r sh

ould

iden

tify

Ref

ere

nce

Pro

ject

s6 in

th

e pr

opos

ed r

esou

rce’

s re

sum

e. T

he R

efer

ence

Pro

ject

6 d

eta

ils s

houl

d in

clu

de:

a)

Nam

e of

the

clie

nt o

rgan

iza

tion;

b)

T

he s

tart

and

end

dat

es, a

nd

dura

tion

(in m

onth

s) th

e p

ropo

sed

CM

L w

orke

d o

n th

e pr

ojec

t; c)

A

des

crip

tion

of th

e pr

opos

ed C

ML’

s ro

le a

nd r

espo

nsib

ilitie

s;

d)

The

Pro

ject

Va

lue8

(CA

D$

); a

nd

e)

Sen

ior

Clie

nt

Ref

eren

ce9

deta

ils,

incl

udin

g na

me,

title

, te

lep

hon

e n

umbe

r an

d em

ail a

ddre

ss.

All

item

s (a

) –

(e)

abov

e sh

ould

be

pro

vide

d fo

r th

e R

efe

ren

ce P

roje

ct6

to b

e co

nsid

ere

d fo

r ev

alua

tion.

Up

to

10

po

ints

, as

follo

ws:

10

po

ints

: T

he p

rop

osed

res

ourc

e ha

s a

min

imum

of 1

2 m

onth

s of

exp

erie

nce

in th

e 1

20

mon

ths

prec

edin

g th

e d

ate

of th

e b

id p

ostin

g.

0

po

ints

: T

he p

ropo

sed

reso

urce

has

less

than

12

mon

ths

of e

xper

ienc

e in

the

last

120

mon

ths

prec

edin

g th

e da

te o

f the

bid

pos

ting.

Max

imu

m A

vaila

ble

Po

ints

50

Min

imu

m P

oin

ts R

equ

ired

30

No

te:

Bid

s th

at d

o n

ot

me

et t

he

abo

ve M

inim

um

Po

ints

Req

uir

e w

ill b

e f

ou

nd

no

n-r

esp

on

sive

.

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

46

of 6

3

R4

– P

roje

ct P

lan

s (2

00 p

oin

ts)

R4.

1 –

Des

ign

Sta

ge P

lan

(100

poi

nts)

Po

int

Rat

ed C

rite

ria

Des

cri

pti

on

M

ax P

ts

Po

int

Allo

cat

ion

S

ub

stan

tiat

ion

The

Bid

der’s

Des

ign

Sta

ge P

lan

sho

uld

desc

ribe

its p

ropo

sed

appr

oach

to th

e

Des

ign

Sta

ge, a

nd

prov

ide

the

Lev

el 4

W

ork

Bre

akdo

wn

Str

uctu

re (

WB

S)

wor

k pl

an fo

r co

mpl

etin

g th

e D

esig

n S

tage

, as

ou

tlin

ed in

SO

W S

ectio

n 7.

The

Lev

el 4

Wor

k B

reak

dow

n S

truc

ture

(W

BS

) is

def

ined

in S

OW

Sec

tion

9.2

.3:

Sch

edul

e M

ana

gem

ent,

whe

re:

o

Leve

l 0 –

Pro

ject

: Th

e D

FO

F

inan

cial

Sys

tem

Ren

ewa

l In

itiat

ive

o

Leve

l 1 –

Su

b-P

roje

ct: D

esig

n S

tag

e

o

Leve

l 2 –

Ph

ase:

For

the

Des

ign

Sta

ge,

ide

ntify

and

des

crib

e th

e

Pha

ses

requ

ired

to

com

plet

e th

e

Des

ign

Sta

ge.

o

Leve

l 3 –

Del

iver

able

: For

eac

h P

hase

, id

entif

y a

nd d

escr

ibe

all

Del

iver

able

s re

qui

red

to b

e pr

oduc

ed in

the

Pha

se.

100

100

The

Bid

der’s

pro

pose

d D

esig

n S

tage

P

lan:

M

eets

all

ten

Des

ign

Sta

ge

Pro

ject

Pla

n R

equi

rem

ents

; and

Doe

s no

t int

rod

uce

a P

roje

ct

Ris

k1 .

The

Bid

der

shou

ld p

rop

ose

an a

ppro

ach

to th

e D

esig

n S

tag

e th

at is

alig

ned

with

S

OW

Sec

tion

7, a

nd p

rovi

des

th

e se

que

nce

of w

ork

to

com

plet

e th

e D

esig

n S

tag

e.

The

Bid

der’s

Lev

el 4

WB

S

shou

ld in

clud

e a

writ

ten

expl

ana

tion

supp

ortin

g e

ach

Pha

se o

f the

WB

S.

75T

he B

idde

r’s p

ropo

sed

Des

ign

Sta

ge

Pla

n:

M

eets

Des

ign

Sta

ge P

roje

ct P

lan

Req

uire

men

ts D

PR

-1 a

nd D

PR

-2;

M

eets

bet

we

en 4

and

7 D

esi

gn

Sta

ge P

roje

ct P

lan

Req

uire

men

ts b

etw

een

DP

R-3

an

d D

PR

-10;

and

D

oes

not i

ntro

duc

e a

Pro

ject

R

isk

1 .

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

47

of 6

3

Po

int

Rat

ed C

rite

ria

Des

cri

pti

on

M

ax P

ts

Po

int

Allo

cat

ion

S

ub

stan

tiat

ion

o

Leve

l 4 –

Wor

k P

acka

ge (

WP

):

For

eac

h D

eliv

erab

le, i

dent

ify a

ll in

depe

nde

nt a

nd d

iscr

ete

Wor

k P

acka

ges

and

the

ir in

terr

ela

tions

hip

s re

quir

ed to

pr

oduc

e th

e D

eliv

erab

le.

T

he B

idde

r’s p

ropo

sed

appr

oach

to

com

plet

ing

the

Des

ign

Sta

ge s

houl

d de

mon

stra

te th

e B

idde

r’s a

bilit

y to

mee

t th

e D

esig

n S

tage

Pro

ject

Pla

n R

equ

irem

ents

ide

ntifi

ed in

App

endi

x 7

of

the

Poi

nt R

ated

Tec

hnic

al E

valu

atio

n C

riter

ia w

itho

ut in

trod

ucin

g a

Pro

ject

R

isk

1 .

50T

he B

idde

r’s p

ropo

sed

Des

ign

Sta

ge

Pla

n:

M

eets

Des

ign

Sta

ge P

roje

ct P

lan

Req

uire

men

ts D

PR

-1 a

nd D

PR

-2;

M

eets

bet

we

en 1

and

3 D

esi

gn

Sta

ge P

roje

ct P

lan

Req

uire

men

ts b

etw

een

DP

R-3

an

d D

PR

-10;

and

D

oes

not i

ntro

duc

e a

Pro

ject

R

isk

1 .

25T

he B

idde

r’s p

ropo

sed

Des

ign

Sta

ge

Pla

n:

M

eets

Des

ign

Sta

ge P

roje

ct P

lan

Req

uire

men

ts D

PR

-1 a

nd D

PR

-2;

an

d

In

trod

uces

one

or

mor

e P

roje

ct

Ris

k1 .

0T

he B

idde

r’s p

ropo

sed

Des

ign

Sta

ge

Pla

n:

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

48

of 6

3

Po

int

Rat

ed C

rite

ria

Des

cri

pti

on

M

ax P

ts

Po

int

Allo

cat

ion

S

ub

stan

tiat

ion

D

oes

not m

eet D

esig

n S

tag

e P

roje

ct P

lan

Req

uire

men

t D

PR

-1

or d

oes

not

mee

t Des

ign

Sta

ge

Pro

ject

Pla

n R

equi

rem

ent

DP

R-2

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

49

of 6

3

R4.

2 –

Impl

emen

tatio

n S

tage

Pla

n (1

00

poin

ts)

Po

int

Rat

ed C

rite

ria

Des

cri

pti

on

M

ax P

ts

Po

int

Allo

cat

ion

S

ub

stan

tiat

ion

The

Bid

der’s

Impl

emen

tatio

n S

tage

Pla

n sh

ould

des

crib

e its

pro

pos

ed a

ppr

oach

to

the

Impl

emen

tatio

n S

tag

e, a

nd p

rovi

de

the

Lev

el 4

Wor

k B

reak

dow

n S

truc

ture

(W

BS

) w

ork

plan

for

com

plet

ing

the

Impl

emen

tatio

n S

tag

e, a

s ou

tline

d in

S

OW

Sec

tion

8.

The

Lev

el 4

Wor

k B

reak

dow

n S

truc

ture

(W

BS

) is

def

ined

in S

OW

Sec

tion

9.2

.3:

Sch

edul

e M

ana

gem

ent,

whe

re:

o

Leve

l 0 –

Pro

ject

: The

DF

O

Fin

anci

al S

yste

m R

enew

al

Initi

ativ

e o

Le

vel 1

– S

ub-

Pro

ject

: Im

plem

enta

tion

Sta

ge

o

Le

vel 2

– P

has

e: F

or th

e Im

plem

enta

tion

Sta

ge,

ide

ntify

an

d de

scrib

e th

e P

has

es r

equi

red

to c

ompl

ete

the

Impl

emen

tatio

n S

tag

e.

o

Leve

l 3 –

Del

iver

able

: For

eac

h P

hase

, id

entif

y a

nd d

escr

ibe

all

Del

iver

able

s re

qui

red

to b

e pr

oduc

ed in

the

Pha

se.

o

Leve

l 4 –

Wor

k P

acka

ge (

WP

):

100

100

The

Bid

der’s

pro

pose

d Im

plem

enta

tion

Sta

ge P

lan:

M

eets

all

ten

Impl

emen

tatio

n S

tage

Pro

ject

Pla

n R

equ

irem

ents

; and

Doe

s no

t int

rod

uce

a P

roje

ct

Ris

k1 .

The

Bid

der

shou

ld p

rop

ose

an a

ppro

ach

to th

e Im

plem

enta

tion

Sta

ge

that

is

alig

ned

with

SO

W S

ectio

n 8,

an

d pr

ovid

es th

e se

que

nce

of

wor

k to

com

plet

e th

e Im

plem

enta

tion

Sta

ge.

The

Bid

der’s

Lev

el 4

WB

S

shou

ld in

clud

e a

writ

ten

expl

ana

tion

supp

ortin

g e

ach

Pha

se o

f the

WB

S.

75T

he B

idde

r’s p

ropo

sed

Impl

emen

tatio

n S

tage

Pla

n:

M

eets

Impl

emen

tatio

n S

tag

e P

roje

ct P

lan

Req

uire

men

ts IP

R-1

an

d IP

R-2

;

Mee

ts b

etw

een

4 a

nd 7

Im

plem

enta

tion

Sta

ge

Pro

ject

P

lan

Re

quire

men

ts b

etw

ee

n IP

R-3

and

IPR

-10;

and

D

oes

not i

ntro

duc

e a

Pro

ject

R

isk

1 .

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

50

of 6

3

Po

int

Rat

ed C

rite

ria

Des

cri

pti

on

M

ax P

ts

Po

int

Allo

cat

ion

S

ub

stan

tiat

ion

For

eac

h D

eliv

erab

le, i

dent

ify a

ll in

depe

nde

nt a

nd d

iscr

ete

Wor

k P

acka

ges

and

the

ir in

terr

ela

tions

hip

s re

quir

ed to

pr

oduc

e th

e D

eliv

erab

le.

T

he B

idde

r’s p

ropo

sed

appr

oach

to

com

plet

ing

the

Impl

emen

tatio

n S

tage

sh

ould

dem

onst

rate

the

Bid

der’s

abi

lity

to

mee

t the

Impl

emen

tatio

n S

tage

Pro

ject

P

lan

Req

uire

men

ts id

entif

ied

in A

ppe

ndix

8

of t

he P

oin

t Rat

ed

Tec

hnic

al E

valu

atio

n C

riter

ia w

itho

ut in

trod

ucin

g a

Pro

ject

R

isk

1 .

50T

he B

idde

r’s p

ropo

sed

Impl

emen

tatio

n S

tage

Pla

n:

M

eets

Impl

emen

tatio

n S

tag

e P

roje

ct P

lan

Req

uire

men

ts IP

R-1

an

d IP

R-2

;

Mee

ts b

etw

een

1 a

nd 3

Im

plem

enta

tion

Sta

ge

Pro

ject

P

lan

Re

quire

men

ts b

etw

ee

n IP

R-3

and

IPR

-10;

and

D

oes

not i

ntro

duc

e a

Pro

ject

R

isk

1 .

25T

he B

idde

r’s p

ropo

sed

Impl

emen

tatio

n S

tage

Pla

n:

M

eets

Impl

emen

tatio

n S

tag

e P

roje

ct P

lan

Req

uire

men

ts IP

R-1

an

d IP

R-2

; an

d

In

trod

uces

one

or

mor

e P

roje

ct

Ris

k1 .

0T

he B

idde

r’s p

ropo

sed

Impl

emen

tatio

n S

tage

Pla

n:

D

oes

not m

eet I

mpl

emen

tatio

n

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

51

of 6

3

Po

int

Rat

ed C

rite

ria

Des

cri

pti

on

M

ax P

ts

Po

int

Allo

cat

ion

S

ub

stan

tiat

ion

Sta

ge P

roje

ct P

lan

Req

uire

men

t IP

R-1

or

does

not

mee

t Im

plem

enta

tion

Sta

ge

Pro

ject

P

lan

Re

quire

men

t IP

R-2

.

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

52

of 6

3

Ap

pen

dix

1 t

o P

oin

t R

ate

d T

ech

nic

al E

valu

atio

n C

rite

ria

: D

efin

itio

ns

The

follo

win

g de

finiti

ons

ap

ply

to t

he P

oin

t R

ated

Tec

hni

cal E

valu

atio

n C

rite

ria.

1.

Pro

ject

Ris

k: A

n ev

ent

or

cond

ition

that

co

uld

hav

e an

impa

ct o

n ac

hiev

ing

the

DF

SR

Pro

ject

Ob

ject

ives

2 . T

he c

ate

gori

es o

f ris

ks

eval

uate

d a

re:

o

P

roje

ct s

ched

ule

; o

P

roje

ct c

ost;

o

P

roje

ct b

ene

fit r

ealiz

atio

n;

o

Com

mun

icat

ions

and

Sta

keh

old

er3

eng

agem

ent;

o

D

isru

ptio

n to

DF

O, O

ther

Go

vern

men

t D

epar

tmen

ts (

OG

Ds)

4 , o

r E

xter

nal

Th

ird

Par

ties

5 op

erat

ions

and

/or

busi

nes

s; a

nd

o

Rep

utat

iona

l ris

ks.

2.

D

FS

R P

roje

ct O

bje

ctiv

es:

Ref

ere

nced

in t

his

RF

P A

ttac

hmen

t ref

ers

to th

e p

roje

ct D

FO

Fin

anc

ial S

yste

m R

enew

al (

DF

SR

) pr

ojec

t ob

ject

ives

iden

tifie

d in

SO

W S

ectio

n 3.

3.

Sta

keh

old

er:

DF

O in

tern

al s

take

hold

er g

roup

s, in

clud

ing

but

not

lim

ited

to th

e C

FO

Sec

tor,

Can

adia

n C

oast

Gua

rd, H

uman

Res

ourc

es

and

Cor

pora

te S

ervi

ces,

an

d D

FO

reg

ions

und

er th

e R

egio

nal D

irect

or G

ener

als.

4.

Oth

er G

ove

rnm

ent

Dep

artm

ents

(O

GD

s):

OD

Gs

wh

ich

DF

O in

tera

cts

with

, inc

ludi

ng b

ut n

ot li

mite

d to

the

Dep

artm

ent o

f Fin

anc

e,

Pub

lic S

ervi

ces

and

Pro

cure

men

t Can

ada

(PS

PC

), a

nd

Tre

asur

y B

oar

d S

ecre

tari

at O

ffice

of t

he C

ontr

olle

r G

ener

al (

TB

S-O

CG

).

5.

E

xter

nal

Th

ird

Par

ties

: E

xter

nal t

hird

par

ties

that

DF

O in

tera

cts

with

, in

clud

ing

but

no

t lim

ited

to th

e B

ank

of M

ontr

eal,

New

fou

ndla

nd

Pow

er,

and

AR

I Ca

nad

a.

6.

R

efer

ence

Pro

ject

(s):

A R

efer

ence

Pro

ject

is a

clie

nt-d

efin

ed p

roje

ct fo

r w

hich

the

Key

Res

ourc

e pr

ovid

ed c

onsu

lting

ser

vice

s to

ass

ist

the

clie

nt i

n de

liver

ing

the

pro

ject

.

7.

Lar

ge

Sca

le T

ech

no

log

y E

nab

led

Pro

ject

s: P

roje

cts

with

a P

roje

ct V

alu

e8 gr

eate

r th

an $

25M

(C

AD

) to

des

ign

and

impl

emen

t fu

ndam

enta

l cha

nges

tha

t im

pact

bus

ines

s pr

oces

ses,

org

aniz

atio

n, p

eopl

e an

d te

chno

logy

. The

pro

ject

mus

t:

o

Hav

e a

proj

ect d

urat

ion

of o

ver

twel

ve (

12)

mon

ths;

o

H

ave

a pe

ak p

roje

ct te

am s

ize

of o

ver

50 f

ull t

ime

reso

urce

s (c

lient

em

plo

yees

an

d co

ntra

ctor

s);

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

53

of 6

3

o

Sup

port

s an

org

aniz

atio

n of

ove

r 10

,000

em

plo

yees

; o

Im

pact

mul

tiple

inte

rna

l Sta

keh

old

er3 g

rou

ps;

o

Impa

ct a

n en

d us

er c

omm

unity

of

grea

ter

than

3,0

00 in

divi

dua

ls a

cros

s m

ultip

le f

unct

ion

al a

reas

, o

In

volv

e at

leas

t one

Oth

er G

ove

rnm

ent

Dep

artm

ent

(OD

G)4

or E

xter

nal

Th

ird

Par

ty5 ;

and

o

H

ave

an im

pact

acr

oss

mul

tiple

geo

grap

hic

al lo

catio

ns, i

n a

dec

entr

aliz

ed, m

ulti-

regi

ona

l env

ironm

ent.

8.

Pro

ject

Val

ue

: T

otal

cos

t o

f the

pro

ject

, in

Ca

nad

ian

dol

lars

(C

AD

$),

incl

udin

g th

e c

lient

org

aniz

atio

n’s

inte

rnal

cos

ts, e

xter

nal

prof

essi

ona

l ser

vice

s co

sts,

har

dwar

e co

sts,

an

d so

ftwar

e co

sts.

9.

Sen

ior

Clie

nt

Ref

eren

ce:

Def

ined

as

Ch

ief E

xecu

tive

Offi

cer

(CE

O),

Chi

ef In

form

atio

n O

ffice

r (C

IO),

Ass

ocia

te D

eput

y M

inis

ter

(AD

M),

V

ice

Pre

side

nt (

VP

), G

ener

al M

ana

ger

(GM

), D

irect

or G

ener

al (

DG

), C

hief

Ope

ratio

ns O

ffic

er (

CO

O),

Chi

ef F

inan

cial

Off

icer

(C

FO

), C

hie

f In

form

atio

n O

ffic

er (

CIO

). I

n th

e pr

ivat

e se

ctor

, S

enio

r C

lient

Ref

ere

nce

is d

efin

ed

as

Pre

side

nt, V

ice

Pre

sid

ent (

VP

), a

nd

Ch

ief

Exe

cutiv

e O

ffice

r (C

EO

).

10

. S

AP

Fin

anci

als

So

luti

on

: A

pro

ject

invo

lvin

g th

e im

plem

enta

tion

of a

n S

AP

fina

nci

al m

anag

emen

t sol

utio

n us

ing

the

SA

P F

inan

cial

A

ccou

ntin

g (F

I) a

nd C

ontr

ollin

g (C

O)

mod

ules

, usi

ng S

AP

Ent

erpr

ise

Res

ourc

e P

lann

ing

(ER

P)

Fin

anci

als,

or

usin

g S

AP

S/4

HA

NA

F

inan

ce.

11.

SA

P S

/4H

AN

A I

mp

lem

enta

tio

n:

A p

roje

ct t

hat

impl

emen

ted

SA

P S

/4H

AN

A. S

AP

Bus

ines

s S

uite

4 S

AP

HA

NA

(S

AP

S/4

HA

NA

) is

a

busi

ness

sui

te t

hat i

s bu

ilt o

n S

AP

's p

ropr

ieta

ry o

per

atio

nal d

atab

ase

syst

em a

nd in

-mem

ory

com

putin

g p

latfo

rm c

alle

d S

AP

HA

NA

. S

AP

S

/4H

AN

A is

the

suc

cess

or o

f SA

P R

/3 a

nd S

AP

ER

P a

nd is

opt

imiz

ed fo

r S

AP

's in

-mem

ory

data

base

SA

P H

AN

A.

12

. S

yste

ms

Inte

gra

tio

n:

Arc

hite

ctur

e, d

esig

n, d

eve

lopm

ent,

and

test

ing

for

the

purp

ose

s of

un

ifyin

g d

ispa

rate

Info

rmat

ion

Tec

hno

log

y (I

T)

com

pone

nt s

ub-s

yste

ms

into

a c

ohes

ive

solu

tion

to d

eliv

er b

usin

ess

capa

bilit

y.

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

54

of 6

3

Ap

pen

dix

2 t

o P

oin

t R

ate

d T

ech

nic

al E

valu

atio

n C

rite

ria

: M

eth

od

olo

gy

Req

uir

emen

ts

Met

ho

do

log

y R

equ

irem

ent

(MR

) R

equ

irem

ent

Des

crip

tio

n

MR

-1

The

Bid

der’s

pro

pose

d M

etho

dolo

gy

shou

ld b

e a

n A

gile

Dev

elo

pmen

t Me

thod

olo

gy w

hic

h em

ploy

s ite

rativ

e an

d in

crem

enta

l de

velo

pmen

t met

hods

.

MR

-2

The

Bid

der’s

pro

pose

d M

etho

dolo

gy

shou

ld b

e co

llabo

rativ

e*.

*For

the

pur

pose

of t

his

met

hodo

log

y re

quire

men

t, co

llabo

rativ

e is

def

ine

d as

: a m

etho

dolo

gy

that

acc

ount

s fo

r in

tera

ctio

ns

with

sta

keho

lder

s, g

over

nanc

e st

ruct

ure

and

pro

ject

lead

er.

M

R-3

T

he B

idde

r’s p

ropo

sed

Met

hodo

log

y sh

ould

incl

ude

early

and

ong

oing

sta

keho

lde

r en

gage

men

t.

MR

-4

The

Bid

der’s

pro

pose

d M

etho

dolo

gy

shou

ld d

eta

il th

e m

etho

ds, t

echn

ique

s an

d pr

oces

ses

by

whi

ch t

he C

ontr

acto

r w

ill w

ork

with

DF

O’s

pro

ject

team

mem

bers

and

Su

bjec

t M

atte

r E

xper

ts (

SM

Es)

wh

o w

ill b

e di

stri

bute

d in

loca

tions

acr

oss

Can

ada.

MR

-5

The

Bid

der’s

pro

pose

d M

etho

dolo

gy

shou

ld in

clud

e co

llabo

ratio

n te

chno

log

y to

ols

and

solu

tions

** t

hat

will

be

used

to e

nga

ge

DF

O’s

pro

ject

team

mem

bers

and

SM

Es

who

will

be

dis

trib

ute

d in

loca

tions

acr

oss

Can

ada.

Th

ese

colla

bora

tion

tool

s an

d so

lutio

ns**

mus

t be

empl

oye

d du

ring

the

Des

ign

and

Impl

emen

tatio

n S

tag

es.

**F

or th

e pu

rpos

e of

MR

-5,

colla

bora

tion

tech

nolo

gy to

ols

and

solu

tions

ref

ers

to w

eb e

nab

led

tech

nolo

gy t

hat

en

able

, at

a

min

imum

, mor

e th

an tw

o u

sers

to h

ave

real

tim

e di

scus

sion

s, v

ideo

conf

eren

cing

, do

cum

ent s

harin

g an

d ed

iting

all

whi

le

prov

idin

g an

aud

itabl

e h

isto

ry to

trac

k ch

ang

es.

MR

-6

The

Bid

der’s

pro

pose

d M

etho

dolo

gy

shou

ld d

eta

il th

e m

etho

ds, t

echn

ique

s an

d pr

oces

ses

by

whi

ch t

he C

ontr

acto

r w

ill w

ork

with

DF

O P

roje

ct R

esou

rce

s du

ring

Des

ign

and

Impl

emen

tatio

n S

tage

s in

ord

er f

or D

FO

to b

uild

ca

paci

ty a

s de

taile

d in

SO

W

Sec

tion

8.2

.7: I

mpl

emen

tatio

n S

tag

e W

rap-

up.

M

R-7

T

he B

idde

r’s p

ropo

sed

Met

hodo

log

y sh

ould

use

con

cept

ual s

olut

ions

suc

h as

pro

ofs

of c

once

pt a

nd p

roto

type

s to

dev

elo

p,

ana

lyze

, an

d co

nfirm

key

sol

utio

n re

quire

men

ts w

ith s

take

hold

ers.

MR

-8

The

Bid

der’s

pro

pose

d M

etho

dolo

gy

shou

ld le

vera

ge t

he s

tan

dard

off-

the-

shel

f S

AP

so

ftwar

e fu

nctio

nal

ity to

avo

id c

usto

m

deve

lopm

ent,

unle

ss th

e D

FO

bus

ines

s pr

oces

s ca

nnot

be

mod

ifie

d, a

s d

eter

min

ed b

y th

e T

ech

nica

l Aut

hor

ity.

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

55

of 6

3

Met

ho

do

log

y R

equ

irem

ent

(MR

) R

equ

irem

ent

Des

crip

tio

n

MR

-9

The

Bid

der’s

pro

pose

d M

etho

dolo

gy

shou

ld le

vera

ge t

he fu

nctio

nalit

y of

the

GC

fm D

igita

l Cor

e to

avo

id n

ew c

onfig

urat

ion

or

deve

lopm

ent,

unle

ss s

peci

fic G

Cfm

Dig

ital C

ore

func

tiona

lity

is n

ot s

uita

ble

for

DF

O, a

s de

term

ined

by

the

Tec

hnic

al A

uth

ority

.

MR

-10

T

he B

idde

r’s

pro

pose

d M

etho

dolo

gy

shou

ld fo

llow

the

SA

P’s

bes

t pra

ctic

es a

nd g

uide

lines

***

for

all s

oftw

are

conf

igur

atio

ns

and

enh

ance

men

ts, a

nd n

ot l

imit

Can

ada’

s ab

ility

to

upgr

ade

to fu

ture

sof

twar

e re

leas

es in

an

y m

anne

r.

***S

AP

bes

t pra

ctic

es a

nd g

uide

lines

can

be

foun

d at

: ht

tps:

//ww

w.s

ap.c

om/s

ervi

ces/

rapi

d-de

plo

ymen

t.htm

l

MR

-11

T

he B

idde

r’s p

ropo

sed

Met

hodo

log

y sh

ould

det

ail

the

Con

tact

or’s

ap

proa

ch, m

etho

ds a

nd p

roce

sses

by

whi

ch th

e D

FO

G

Cfm

-B s

olut

ion

will

be

kept

in s

ync

and

alig

ned

with

the

TB

S-O

CG

GC

fm D

igita

l Cor

e te

mpl

ate.

MR

-12

T

he B

idde

r’s p

ropo

sed

Met

hodo

log

y sh

ould

det

ail

how

the

Con

trac

tor

will

eng

age

TB

S-O

CG

to e

nsur

e th

e D

FO

GC

fm-B

so

lutio

n w

ill b

e a

lign

ed w

ith th

e T

BS

-OC

G G

Cfm

Dig

ital C

ore

tem

plat

e.

M

R-1

3

The

Bid

der’s

pro

pose

d M

etho

dolo

gy

shou

ld d

eta

il ho

w th

e C

ontr

acto

r w

ill e

ngag

e T

BS

-OC

G S

AP

con

figur

ator

s an

d de

velo

pers

dur

ing

desi

gn a

nd d

evel

opm

ent o

f th

e D

FO

GC

fm-B

sol

utio

n.

M

R-1

4

The

Bid

der’s

pro

pose

d M

etho

dolo

gy

shou

ld d

eta

il ho

w th

e C

ontr

acto

r w

ill f

ulfil

l leg

acy

rep

ortin

g re

quir

emen

ts u

sing

new

rep

ortin

g ca

pab

ilitie

s

.

MR

-15

T

he B

idde

r’s p

ropo

sed

Met

hodo

log

y sh

ould

det

ail

how

the

Con

trac

tor

will

per

form

suc

cess

ful a

pplic

atio

n in

tegr

atio

n be

twe

en

leg

acy

syst

ems

and

the

DF

O F

inan

cial

Sys

tem

s S

olut

ion.

MR

-16

T

he B

idde

r’s p

ropo

sed

Met

hodo

log

y sh

ould

det

ail

how

the

Con

trac

tor

will

per

form

suc

cess

ful s

yste

m in

tegr

atio

n b

etw

een

leg

acy

syst

ems

and

clou

d -d

eplo

yed

GC

fm a

nd th

e D

FO

Fin

anci

al S

yste

ms

Sol

utio

n co

mpo

nent

s.

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

56

of 6

3

Ap

pen

dix

3 t

o P

oin

t R

ate

d T

ech

nic

al E

valu

atio

n C

rite

ria

: B

usi

nes

s T

ran

sfo

rmat

ion

Ap

pro

ach

Req

uir

em

ents

Bu

sin

ess

Tra

nsf

orm

atio

n

Ap

pro

ach

R

equ

irem

ent

(BT

R)

Req

uir

emen

t D

escr

ipti

on

BT

R-1

T

he B

idde

r sh

oul

d de

scrib

e h

ow t

he B

idde

r’s p

ropo

sed

Bus

ines

s T

rans

form

atio

n A

ppro

ach

will

en

able

the

DF

O to

ach

ieve

th

e D

FS

R P

roje

ct O

bje

ctiv

es2 .

BT

R-2

T

he B

idde

r sh

oul

d de

scrib

e h

ow t

he B

idde

r’s p

ropo

sed

Bus

ines

s T

rans

form

atio

n A

ppro

ach

will

en

gage

Sta

keh

old

ers

3

thro

ugho

ut t

he

Des

ign

and

Impl

emen

tatio

n S

tag

es.

B

TR

-3

The

Bid

der

sho

uld

desc

ribe

how

the

Bid

der

has

tailo

red

its s

tand

ard

Bus

ines

s T

rans

form

atio

n A

ppro

ach

to t

he D

FS

R

Pro

ject

.

BT

R-4

T

he B

idde

r sh

oul

d de

scrib

e h

ow t

he B

idde

r’s p

ropo

sed

Bus

ines

s tr

ansf

orm

atio

n A

ppro

ach

will

leve

rage

and

invo

lve

its

corp

orat

e-w

ide

know

ledg

e, e

xper

tise

and

exp

erie

nce

in L

arg

e S

cal

e T

ech

no

log

y E

nab

led

Pro

ject

s7 .

BT

R-5

T

he B

idde

r sh

oul

d de

scrib

e h

ow t

he B

idde

r’s p

ropo

sed

Bus

ines

s tr

ansf

orm

atio

n A

ppro

ach

will

leve

rage

and

invo

lve

its

corp

orat

e-w

ide

know

ledg

e, e

xper

tise

and

exp

erie

nce

in S

AP

Fin

anci

als

So

luti

on

10 p

roje

cts.

BT

R-6

T

he B

idde

r’s p

ropo

sed

Ski

ll D

evel

opm

ent a

nd B

usin

ess

Tra

nsfo

rmat

ion

Ap

proa

ch s

houl

d id

entif

y an

y ris

ks a

ssoc

iate

d w

ith

the

pro

pose

d ap

proa

ch, a

long

with

pro

pose

d m

itiga

tion

stra

tegi

es fo

r a

ny

iden

tifie

d ris

ks.

B

TR

-7

The

Bid

der

sho

uld

desc

ribe

how

the

Bid

der’s

pro

pose

d B

usin

ess

Tra

nsfo

rmat

ion

App

roac

h w

ill c

oord

inat

e a

nd in

tegr

ate

busi

ness

tran

sfor

mat

ion

activ

ities

acr

oss

Bid

der

Res

ourc

es, D

FO

Res

ourc

es, S

take

ho

lder

s3 ,

Oth

er G

ove

rnm

ent

De

par

tme

nts

(O

DG

s)4

and

Ext

ern

al T

hir

d P

arti

es

5 .

B

TR

-8

The

Bid

der

sho

uld

desc

ribe

how

the

Bid

der’s

pro

pose

d B

usin

ess

Tra

nsfo

rmat

ion

App

roac

h w

ill u

se c

once

ptua

l so

lutio

ns

and

inn

ovat

ive

con

cep

ts.

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

57

of 6

3

Ap

pen

dix

4 t

o P

oin

t R

ate

d T

ech

nic

al E

valu

atio

n C

rite

ria

: C

han

ge

Man

agem

en

t A

pp

roac

h R

equ

irem

ents

Ch

ang

e M

anag

emen

t A

pp

roac

h

Req

uir

emen

t (C

MR

)

Req

uir

emen

t D

escr

ipti

on

CM

R-1

T

he B

idde

r sh

oul

d de

scrib

e h

ow t

he B

idde

r’s p

ropo

sed

Cha

nge

Man

agem

ent A

ppro

ach

will

en

able

the

DF

O to

ach

ieve

the

DF

SR

Pro

ject

Ob

ject

ives

2 .

C

MR

-2

The

Bid

der

sho

uld

desc

ribe

how

the

Bid

der’s

pro

pose

d C

han

ge M

anag

emen

t App

roac

h w

ill e

nga

ge

Sta

keh

old

ers

3

thro

ugho

ut t

he

Des

ign

and

Impl

emen

tatio

n S

tag

es.

C

MR

-3

The

Bid

der

sho

uld

desc

ribe

how

the

Bid

der

has

tailo

red

its s

tand

ard

Cha

nge

Ma

nage

men

t Ap

proa

ch to

the

DF

SR

Pro

ject

.

CM

R-4

T

he B

idde

r sh

oul

d de

scrib

e h

ow t

he B

idde

r’s p

ropo

sed

Cha

nge

Man

agem

ent A

ppro

ach

will

leve

rage

and

invo

lve

its

corp

orat

e-w

ide

know

ledg

e, e

xper

tise

and

exp

erie

nce

in L

arg

e S

cal

e T

ech

no

log

y E

nab

led

Pro

ject

s7 .

CM

R-5

T

he B

idde

r sh

oul

d de

scrib

e h

ow t

he B

idde

r’s p

ropo

sed

Cha

nge

Man

agem

ent A

ppro

ach

will

leve

rage

and

invo

lve

its

corp

orat

e-w

ide

know

ledg

e, e

xper

tise

and

exp

erie

nce

in S

AP

Fin

anci

als

So

luti

on

10 p

roje

cts.

CM

R-6

T

he B

idde

r’s p

ropo

sed

Ch

ang

e M

anag

emen

t App

roac

h sh

ould

ide

ntify

an

y ris

ks a

ssoc

iate

d w

ith th

e pr

opos

ed a

ppro

ach

, al

ong

with

pro

pos

ed m

itiga

tion

stra

teg

ies

for

any

iden

tifie

d ri

sks.

CM

R-7

T

he B

idde

r sh

oul

d de

scrib

e h

ow t

he B

idde

r’s p

ropo

sed

Cha

nge

Man

agem

ent A

ppro

ach

will

coo

rdin

ate

and

inte

grat

e ch

ange

m

anag

emen

t act

iviti

es a

cros

s B

idd

er R

esou

rces

, DF

O R

esou

rces

, S

take

ho

lder

s3 ,

Oth

er G

ove

rnm

ent

Dep

artm

ents

(O

DG

s)4

and

Ext

ern

al T

hir

d P

arti

es5 .

CM

R-8

T

he B

idde

r sh

oul

d de

scrib

e h

ow t

he B

idde

r’s p

ropo

sed

Cha

nge

Man

agem

ent A

ppro

ach

will

use

con

cept

ual

sol

utio

ns a

nd

inn

ovat

ive

conc

epts

.

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

58

of 6

3

Ap

pen

dix

5 t

o P

oin

t R

ate

d T

ech

nic

al E

valu

atio

n C

rite

ria

: S

kill

De

velo

pm

ent

and

Kn

ow

led

ge

Tra

nsf

er A

pp

roac

h R

equ

irem

ents

Ski

ll D

eve

lop

men

t an

d K

no

wle

dg

e T

ran

sfer

Ap

pro

ach

R

equ

irem

ent

(SK

R)

Req

uir

emen

t D

escr

ipti

on

SK

R-1

T

he B

idde

r sh

oul

d de

scrib

e h

ow t

he B

idde

r’s p

ropo

sed

Ski

ll D

evel

opm

ent a

nd K

now

ledg

e T

rans

fer

App

roac

h w

ill e

nabl

e th

e D

FO

to a

chie

ve t

he D

FS

R P

roje

ct O

bje

ctiv

es2 .

SK

R-2

T

he B

idde

r sh

oul

d de

scrib

e h

ow t

he B

idde

r’s p

ropo

sed

Ski

ll D

evel

opm

ent a

nd K

now

ledg

e T

rans

fer

App

roac

h w

ill e

ngag

e

DF

O R

esou

rces

thro

ugho

ut th

e D

esig

n an

d Im

plem

enta

tion

Sta

ges.

SK

R-3

T

he B

idde

r sh

oul

d de

scrib

e h

ow t

he B

idde

r ha

s ta

ilore

d its

sta

ndar

d S

kill

Dev

elo

pmen

t and

Kno

wle

dge

Tra

nsfe

r A

ppro

ach

to

the

DF

SR

Pro

ject

.

SK

R-4

T

he B

idde

r sh

oul

d de

scrib

e h

ow t

he B

idde

r’s p

ropo

sed

Ski

ll D

evel

opm

ent a

nd K

now

ledg

e T

rans

fer

App

roac

h w

ill le

vera

ge

and

invo

lve

its c

orpo

rate

-wid

e kn

owle

dge,

exp

ertis

e a

nd

exp

erie

nce

in S

AP

Fin

anci

als

So

luti

on

10

proj

ects

.

SK

R-5

T

he B

idde

r sh

oul

d de

scrib

e h

ow t

he B

idde

r’s p

ropo

sed

Ski

ll D

evel

opm

ent a

nd K

now

ledg

e T

rans

fer

App

roac

h w

ill le

vera

ge

and

invo

lve

its c

orpo

rate

-wid

e kn

owle

dge,

exp

ertis

e a

nd

exp

erie

nce

in S

AP

S/4

HA

NA

Imp

lem

enta

tio

n1

1 pr

oje

cts.

SK

R-6

T

he

Bid

de

r’s p

ropo

sed

Ski

ll D

eve

lopm

ent a

nd K

now

led

ge T

rans

fer

Ap

proa

ch s

hou

ld id

ent

ify a

ny

risks

ass

oci

ate

d w

ith t

he

pro

pos

ed

ap

pro

ach

, a

long

with

pro

po

sed

miti

ga

tion

str

ateg

ies

for

any

ide

ntif

ied

ris

ks.

S

KR

-7

The

Bid

der

sho

uld

desc

ribe

how

the

Bid

der’s

pro

pose

d S

kill

Dev

elop

men

t and

Kn

owle

dge

Tra

nsfe

r A

ppro

ach

will

co

ordi

nate

an

d in

tegr

ate

skill

dev

elo

pm

ent a

nd k

now

ledg

e tr

ansf

er a

ctiv

ities

acr

oss

Bid

der

Res

ourc

es a

nd

DF

O R

eso

urce

s.

S

KR

-8

The

Bid

der

sho

uld

desc

ribe

how

the

Bid

der’s

pro

pose

d S

kill

Dev

elop

men

t and

Kn

owle

dge

Tra

nsfe

r A

ppro

ach

will

use

co

ncep

tual

so

lutio

ns a

nd in

nova

tive

con

cept

s.

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

59

of 6

3

Ap

pen

dix

6 t

o P

oin

t R

ate

d T

ech

nic

al E

valu

atio

n C

rite

ria

: P

roje

ct T

eam

Str

uc

ture

Req

uir

emen

ts

Pro

ject

Tea

m

Str

uct

ure

R

equ

irem

ent

(TS

R)

Req

uir

emen

t D

escr

ipti

on

TS

R-1

T

he B

idde

r sh

oul

d de

scrib

e p

rovi

de a

Pro

ject

Tea

m S

truc

ture

org

aniz

atio

n ch

art,

and

des

crib

e ho

w it

will

em

plo

y th

e us

e o

f B

idde

r a

nd D

FO

Co-

Lead

s to

ove

rsee

the

pro

ject

wor

k st

ream

s an

d/or

pro

ject

sub

-tea

ms.

TS

R-2

T

he B

idde

r sh

oul

d de

scrib

e h

ow t

he B

idde

r’s p

ropo

sed

Pro

ject

Tea

m S

truc

ture

and

ass

ocia

ted

Res

ourc

e S

trat

egy

will

be

used

to

wor

k w

ith D

FO

Pro

ject

Res

ourc

es d

urin

g D

esig

n an

d Im

plem

enta

tion

Sta

ges

in o

rder

for

DF

O to

bui

ld c

ap

acity

and

ski

lls a

s de

taile

d in

SO

W S

ectio

n 8.

2.7:

Impl

emen

tatio

n S

tage

Wra

p-up

.

TS

R-3

T

he B

idde

r sh

oul

d de

scrib

e h

ow t

he B

idde

r’s p

ropo

sed

Pro

ject

Tea

m S

truc

ture

and

ass

ocia

ted

Res

ourc

e S

trat

egy

will

ena

ble

the

DF

O t

o ac

hie

ve t

he D

FS

R P

roje

ct O

bje

ctiv

es2 .

TS

R-4

T

he B

idde

r sh

oul

d pr

ovid

e a

Pro

ject

Te

am S

truc

ture

org

aniz

atio

n ch

art,

and

des

crib

e its

alig

nmen

t with

Dep

artm

ent o

f F

ishe

ries

and

Oce

ans

Pro

ject

Gov

erna

nce

bodi

es d

escr

ibed

in S

OW

Sec

tion

6.1

.

TS

R-5

T

he B

idde

r sh

oul

d de

scrib

e th

e ke

y ro

les

iden

tifie

d in

the

Bid

der’s

Pro

ject

Tea

m S

truc

ture

org

ani

zatio

n ch

art,

incl

udi

ng

resp

onsi

bili

ties,

aut

hori

ties

and

role

inte

ract

ions

and

how

thes

e ke

y ro

les

evol

ve d

urin

g th

e D

esig

n an

d Im

plem

enta

tion

Sta

ges.

TS

R-6

T

he B

idde

r sh

oul

d de

scrib

e it

s ap

proa

ch t

o le

vera

ge a

nd in

volv

e its

cor

pora

te-w

ide

know

led

ge, e

xper

tise

an

d ex

perie

nce

in

SA

P F

inan

cial

s S

olu

tio

n10

pro

ject

s.

T

SR

-7

The

Bid

der

sho

uld

desc

ribe

its

appr

oach

to

leve

rage

and

invo

lve

its c

orpo

rate

-wid

e kn

owle

dge

, exp

ertis

e a

nd

expe

rienc

e in

S

AP

S/4

HA

NA

Im

ple

men

tati

on

11

proj

ects

.

TS

R-8

T

he B

idde

r sh

oul

d de

scrib

e it

s p

lan

ned

reso

urce

ava

ilabi

lity

(e.g

. fu

ll tim

e, p

art t

ime,

as

requ

ired,

etc

.) a

nd r

esou

rce

loca

tions

.

TS

R-9

T

he B

idde

r sh

oul

d de

scrib

e it

s re

sour

ce s

elec

tion,

re

tent

ion

and

re

plac

emen

t str

ateg

ies.

TS

R-1

0 T

he B

idde

r sh

oul

d de

scrib

e h

ow t

he B

idde

r’s p

ropo

sed

Pro

ject

Tea

m S

truc

ture

and

ass

ocia

ted

Res

ourc

e S

trat

egy

will

in

tegr

ate

and

wor

k w

ith T

BS

-OC

G a

s it

rela

tes

to th

e G

Cfm

Dig

ital C

ore

tem

plat

e.

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

60

of 6

3

Ap

pen

dix

7 t

o P

oin

t R

ate

d T

ech

nic

al E

valu

atio

n C

rite

ria

: D

esig

n S

tag

e P

roje

ct P

lan

Req

uir

emen

ts

Des

ign

Sta

ge

Pro

ject

Pla

n

Req

uir

emen

t (D

PR

) R

equ

irem

ent

Des

crip

tio

n

DP

R-1

T

he B

idde

r’s L

evel

4 W

BS

sho

uld

incl

ude

all o

f the

Ta

sks

and

Del

iver

able

s id

entif

ied

in S

OW

Sec

tion

7.2,

an

d sh

ould

incl

ude

a

writ

ten

exp

lana

tion

sup

po

rtin

g ea

ch P

hase

of t

he W

BS

(i.e

., ex

pla

natio

n fo

r e

ach

Lev

el 2

– P

hase

in t

he W

BS

)

DP

R-2

T

he B

idde

r’s p

ropo

sed

app

roac

h to

the

Des

ign

Sta

ge

and

the

Bid

der’s

Lev

el 4

WB

S s

hou

ld id

entif

y al

l Bid

der

Res

ourc

es,

usin

g th

e pr

ofes

sion

al s

ervi

ces

cate

gori

es fo

und

in S

OW

Sec

tion

10.

1, a

nd

asso

ciat

ed le

vels

of e

ffort

req

uire

d b

y ea

ch

reso

urce

to c

ompl

ete

the

Tas

ks a

nd D

eliv

erab

les

iden

tifie

d in

SO

W S

ectio

n 7.

2 an

d 9.

2.

The

leve

ls o

f ef

fort

pro

vide

d m

ust

incl

ude

all B

idde

r ris

k co

ntin

genc

ies

nece

ssar

y fo

r th

e B

idde

r to

acc

ept a

firm

fixe

d pr

ice

Tas

k A

uth

oriz

atio

n to

per

form

the

Des

ign

Sta

ge a

s pr

opos

ed.

D

PR

-3

The

Bid

der’s

sho

uld

desc

ribe

how

the

Bid

der’s

pro

pose

d a

ppro

ach

to th

e D

esig

n S

tag

e w

ill e

nabl

e th

e D

FO

to a

chie

ve th

e D

FS

R P

roje

ct O

bje

ctiv

es2 .

DP

R-4

T

he B

idde

r’s p

ropo

sed

app

roac

h to

the

Des

ign

Sta

ge

shou

ld d

escr

ibe

how

the

Bid

der

will

eng

age

Sta

keh

old

ers

3th

roug

hout

th

e D

esig

n S

tage

.

DP

R-5

T

he B

idde

r’s p

ropo

sed

app

roac

h to

the

Des

ign

Sta

ge

shou

ld d

escr

ibe

how

it w

ill e

nsur

e it

acco

unts

for

the

Gov

ernm

ent o

f C

anad

a a

nd D

epar

tmen

t of F

ishe

ries

and

Oce

ans

Tec

hnol

ogy

Gov

erna

nce

bod

ies

desc

ribed

in S

OW

Sec

tion

6.2

.

DP

R-6

T

he B

idde

r’s p

ropo

sed

app

roac

h to

the

Des

ign

Sta

ge

shou

ld d

escr

ibe

how

alig

nm

ent t

o th

e D

FO

Gat

e R

evie

w C

omm

ittee

’s

Pha

ses

and

TB

S g

atin

g as

des

crib

e in

SO

W S

ectio

n 6

.2.4

will

be

achi

eved

.

DP

R-7

T

he B

idde

r’s p

ropo

sed

app

roac

h to

the

Des

ign

Sta

ge

shou

ld id

entif

y al

l Wor

k P

acka

ges

whe

re C

anad

a’s

Res

ourc

es a

re

requ

ired,

and

dem

onst

rate

tha

t the

Bid

der

has

prov

ide

d su

ffici

ent

time

for

plan

nin

g an

d sc

hedu

ling

of C

ana

da’s

Res

our

ces.

DP

R-8

T

he B

idde

r’s L

evel

4 W

BS

sho

uld

iden

tify

the

Cri

tica

l Pat

h fo

r th

e D

esig

n S

tage

, an

d th

e B

idde

r’s p

ropo

sed

appr

oac

h to

the

D

esig

n S

tage

sho

uld

iden

tify

any

risk

s to

the

Crit

ical

Pat

h th

at a

re o

uts

ide

of th

e B

idde

r’s c

ont

rol,

alo

ng

with

pro

pose

d m

itiga

tion

stra

tegi

es f

or

any

ide

ntif

ied

ris

ks.

D

PR

-9

The

Bid

der’s

Lev

el 4

WB

S s

houl

d id

entif

y th

e co

nstr

ain

ts a

nd d

epen

denc

ies

betw

een

Wor

k P

acka

ges.

DP

R-1

0 T

he B

idde

r’s L

evel

4 W

BS

sho

uld

iden

tify

the

maj

or m

ilest

ones

for

the

Des

ign

Sta

ge.

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

61

of 6

3

Ap

pen

dix

8 t

o P

oin

t R

ate

d T

ech

nic

al E

valu

atio

n C

rite

ria

: Im

ple

men

tati

on

Sta

ge

Pro

ject

Pla

n R

equ

irem

ents

Imp

lem

enta

tio

n

Sta

ge

Pro

ject

Pla

n

Req

uir

emen

t (I

PR

) R

equ

irem

ent

Des

crip

tio

n

IPR

-1

The

Bid

der’s

Lev

el 4

WB

S s

houl

d in

clud

e al

l of t

he T

ask

s an

d D

eliv

erab

les

iden

tifie

d in

SO

W S

ectio

n 8.

2, a

nd

shou

ld

incl

ude

a w

ritte

n ex

plan

atio

n su

ppor

ting

eac

h P

hase

of

the

WB

S (

i.e.,

expl

anat

ion

for

each

Lev

el 2

– P

hase

in th

e W

BS

)

IPR

-2

The

Bid

der’s

pro

pose

d ap

pro

ach

to th

e Im

plem

enta

tion

Sta

ge a

nd th

e B

idd

er’s

Lev

el 4

WB

S s

houl

d id

entif

y al

l Bid

der

Res

ourc

es, u

sing

the

prof

ess

iona

l ser

vice

s ca

teg

orie

s fo

und

in S

OW

Sec

tion

10.

1, a

nd a

ssoc

iate

d le

vels

of e

ffort

req

uire

d

by

each

res

our

ce to

com

plet

e th

e T

asks

and

De

liver

abl

es id

ent

ified

in S

OW

Sec

tion

8.2

and

9.2

. T

he

leve

ls o

f eff

ort

prov

ide

d m

ust i

nclu

de

all B

idde

r ris

k co

ntin

gen

cies

nec

essa

ry fo

r th

e B

idde

r to

acc

ept a

firm

fixe

d pr

ice

Tas

k A

uth

oriz

atio

n

to p

erfo

rm th

e Im

plem

enta

tion

Sta

ge

as p

ropo

sed

.

IPR

-3

The

Bid

der’s

sho

uld

desc

ribe

how

the

Bid

der’s

pro

pose

d a

ppro

ach

to th

e Im

plem

enta

tion

Sta

ge

will

en

able

the

DF

O to

ac

hiev

e th

e D

FS

R P

roje

ct O

bje

ctiv

es2 .

IPR

-4

The

Bid

der’s

pro

pose

d ap

pro

ach

to th

e Im

plem

enta

tion

Sta

ge s

hou

ld d

escr

ibe

how

the

Bid

der

will

eng

age

Sta

keh

old

ers

3

thro

ugho

ut t

he

Impl

emen

tatio

n S

tage

.

IPR

-5

The

Bid

der’s

pro

pose

d ap

pro

ach

to th

e Im

plem

enta

tion

Sta

ge s

hou

ld d

escr

ibe

how

it w

ill e

nsur

e it

acco

unt

s fo

r th

e G

over

nmen

t of C

anad

a an

d D

epar

tmen

t of F

ish

erie

s an

d O

cea

ns T

echn

olo

gy G

over

nanc

e bo

die

s d

escr

ibe

d in

SO

W

Sec

tion

6.2

.

IPR

-6

The

Bid

der’s

pro

pose

d ap

pro

ach

to t

he Im

plem

enta

tion

Sta

ge s

hou

ld d

escr

ibe

how

alig

nmen

t to

the

DF

O G

ate

Rev

iew

C

omm

ittee

’s P

has

es a

nd T

BS

gat

ing

as

desc

ribe

in S

OW

Sec

tion

6.2.

4 w

ill b

e ac

hiev

ed.

IPR

-7

The

Bid

der’s

pro

pose

d ap

pro

ach

to th

e Im

plem

enta

tion

Sta

ge s

hou

ld id

ent

ify a

ll W

ork

Pac

kage

s w

her

e C

ana

da’s

R

esou

rces

are

req

uire

d, a

nd

dem

onst

rate

that

the

Bid

der

has

prov

ided

suf

ficie

nt ti

me

for

plan

ning

and

sch

edu

ling

of

Can

ada’

s R

esou

rces

.

IPR

-8

The

Bid

der’s

Lev

el 4

WB

S s

houl

d id

entif

y th

e C

ritic

al P

ath

for

the

Impl

emen

tatio

n S

tage

, an

d th

e B

idde

r’s p

ropo

sed

appr

oach

to t

he Im

plem

enta

tion

Sta

ge

sho

uld

iden

tify

any

risks

to th

e C

ritic

al P

ath

tha

t are

out

side

of t

he B

idde

r’s c

ontr

ol,

alo

ng w

ith p

rop

osed

miti

gatio

n st

rate

gie

s fo

r an

y id

entif

ied

risk

s.

IP

R-9

T

he B

idde

r’s L

evel

4 W

BS

sho

uld

iden

tify

the

cons

tra

ints

and

dep

ende

ncie

s be

twee

n W

ork

Pac

kage

s.

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

62

of 6

3

Imp

lem

enta

tio

n

Sta

ge

Pro

ject

Pla

n

Req

uir

emen

t (I

PR

) R

equ

irem

ent

Des

crip

tio

n

IPR

-10

T

he B

idde

r’s L

evel

4 W

BS

sho

uld

iden

tify

the

maj

or m

ilest

ones

for

the

Impl

emen

tatio

n S

tage

.

Req

uest

for

Info

rmat

ion

No.

A

m. N

o. -

de la

mod

if.

Buy

er ID

- Id

de

l'ach

eteu

r N

° de

la d

ema

nde

d’in

form

atio

n

60

9el

FP

815-

1900

04/A

Page

63

of 6

3

Tec

hn

ical

Pro

po

sal

Eva

luat

ion

: O

ral P

rese

nta

tio

n

Ora

l Pre

sen

tati

on

(30

0 p

oin

ts)

Bid

ders

that

mee

t the

Man

dato

ry C

riter

ia a

nd

the

min

imum

poi

nts

req

uire

d fo

r th

e R

ate

d C

riter

ia w

ill b

e in

vite

d to

par

ticip

ate

in th

e O

ral

Pre

sent

atio

n st

age

of t

he e

valu

atio

n pr

oces

s. B

idde

rs w

ill b

e pr

ovid

ed w

ritt

en n

otifi

catio

n at

leas

t 10

busi

nes

s da

ys in

adv

ance

of t

he

Bid

der’s

Ora

l P

rese

ntat

ion

spec

ifyin

g th

e d

ate

, tim

e an

d lo

catio

n in

the

Na

tiona

l Cap

ital R

egio

n.

Dur

ing

the

Ora

l Pre

sent

atio

n, B

idd

ers

will

be

requ

ired

to a

ddr

ess

thre

e pr

ojec

t sce

nario

s (1

00 p

oint

s ea

ch).

The

pro

ject

sce

nari

o th

emes

and

Ora

l P

rese

ntat

ion

Eva

luat

ion

Cri

teria

will

be

prov

ide

d in

the

RF

P. T

he d

eta

ils o

f th

e sc

ena

rios

will

be

prov

ided

to B

idde

rs 2

bus

ine

ss d

ays

in a

dvan

ce o

f th

e B

idde

r’s O

ral P

rese

nta

tion.

All

Ke

y R

esou

rces

ide

ntifi

ed

in th

e B

idd

er’s

res

pons

e m

ust p

artic

ipat

e in

the

pre

sent

atio

n of

the

sce

nar

io r

espo

nses

; eac

h K

ey

Res

our

ce m

ust

part

icip

ate

in th

e pr

ese

ntat

ion

of a

t le

ast

one

scen

ario

res

pons

e. N

o ot

her

reso

urce

s m

ay p

artic

ipat

e in

the

scen

ario

res

pons

e pr

ese

ntat

ions

.

Dur

ing

the

scen

ario

res

pon

se p

rese

nta

tions

, Ca

nada

will

not

ask

an

y qu

estio

ns o

r re

ques

t cla

rific

atio

ns a

nd

Bid

ders

are

not

per

mitt

ed to

ask

qu

estio

ns o

f Can

ada.

If a

Bid

der

wis

hes

to a

sk a

cla

rific

atio

n q

uest

ion

duri

ng th

e s

cena

rio r

espo

nse

prep

arat

ion

per

iod,

the

Bid

der

mus

t em

ail t

he

ques

tion

to th

e C

ontr

act A

uth

ority

.