FOURTH QUARTERLY MONITORING REPORT OF RASHTRIYA MADHYAMIK...

FOURTH QUARTERLY MONITORING REPORT

OF RASHTRIYA MADHYAMIK SHIKSHA

ABHIYAN (RMSA) IN ODISHA (GANJAM, GAJAPATI, KANDHAMAL AND RAYAGADA

DISTRICTS)

Dr. Rajkishor Meher

Dr. C. R. Das

Nabakrushna Choudhury Centre for Development Studies

Bhubaneswar-751013 (Odisha)

2015

RESEARCH TEAM

NODAL OFFICER

Dr. Rajkishor Meher

FIELD Supervisor Dr. C.R. Das

Field Investigators Shri Harihara Mishra Shri Nalini Kanta Mahapatra Shri Braja Bihari Mishra Shri Jagadish Dash

DATA ENTRY Operator Ms. Kalyani Chinara

SPSS DATA PROCESSING Shri Rajendra Prasad Patro

i

PREFACE

The Nabakrushna Choudhury Centre for Development Studies (NCDS) is an Indian Council

of Social Science Research (ICSSR) institute set up in collaboration with the Government of

Odisha. It takes up development-related research in social science disciplines including

monitoring and evaluation studies that have policy implications.

The current monitoring study has been undertaken to find out the effectiveness of

Rashtriya Madhyamik Shiksha Abhiyan (RMSA) programme implemented in Odisha since

2009. It has been based on the guidelines prepared by the the Ministry of Human Resource

Development (MHRD) and the tabulation design provided by EdCIl (India) Limited. The

current report is the fourth in the series based on a survey carried out in four districts, viz.,

Ganjam, Gajapati, Kandhamal and Rayagada during June-November, 2015.

The study brings out important facets. I point out four aspects. First, there is a need to

fill up the vacant teaching position. This is particularly important in regions where parents are

illiterate, as children would not get any help at home. Second, it was observed that children

coming to high school are unable to read and write either in Odia, not to mention about

English. This raises policy implications for teaching at the primary school level, but

independent of that it calls for providing additional course for such students at the high

school level. Third, expenditure under RMSA for certain aspects requires coordination and

concomitant expenditure in other aspects. For instance, computers need access and

availability of power, and books require a library with reading facilities. Last, but not the

least, is the need to have adequate sanitation facilities that is sensitive to the requirement of

teenage adolescent girls.

I complement the nodal officer of the study Professor Rajkishor Meher for the report.

He has been assisted by Dr Chita Ranjan Das, Research Supervisor, and Mr Harihar Mishra,

Mr Nalini Kanta Mohapatra, Mr Braja Bihari Mishra and Mr Jagadish Dash, Field

Investigators, as also Ms Kalyani Chinara, Computer Operator. The study team benefitted

from the facilitation and cooperation by the State Project Director, RMSA; the District

Education Officers; the Headmasters, teachers and staff of the sample schools; and the School

Management and Development Committee (SMDC) members.

Srijit Mishra

Director

ii

C O N T E N T S

Page No.

Preface

Executive Summary

1. Ganjam District

2. Gajapati District

3. Kandhamal District

4. Rayagada District

5. Status of RMSA in Odisha

6. Overall Observations

i-ii

i-xvi

1-67

68-130

131-191

192-252

253-277

278-280

iii

LIST OF TABLES OF GANJAM

Table

No.

Title Page

No.

1.1 Perspective Plan for the School 2 1.2 Data base/sources adopted/taken for Planning and Plan preparation at

School level other than SEMIS 2

1.3 Whether disadvantaged groups have been appropriately factored in the Plan

2

1.4 Adoption of Convergence approach with schemes/resources of other Departments in School Plan

3

1.5 Convergence Approach 3 1.6 Incorporation of SMDC recommendations in the School Development

Plan 3

1.7 Roles assigned to the SMDCs for implementing the scheme and to seek help & cooperation in ensuring the execution of following in sampled Schools

4

1.8 Clarity amongst SMDC members about their roles. If yes, detail of steps taken by them accordingly

4

1.9 Steps taken by SMDC members (Number of Schools with %) 5

1.10 Meetings of General Body of School Management and Development Committee

6

1.11 Reasons for not holding last meetings and whether the same has been recorded

6

2.1 2.2

Class & Ethnic group-wise, enrollment and attendance (On the day of Field Visit) Physical Access – At School and Habitation’s names Category of the Schools visited

7 8

2.3 Location of the School adjacent to or within any of the following sensitive areas

9

2.4 Names and categories of the feeder primary and upper primary Schools in sampled district

9

2.5 Number of Students enrolled in School from habitations coming from a distance greater than what is prescribed for a neighborhood School

9

2.6 Presence of any natural or man-made barrier that poses any problem for the Students in accessing the School

10

2.7 Name and Distance of the nearest secondary School (Govt. /Pvt.) from the habitation the School is located at, and catchments area of the School

10

2.8 Any special arrangement like transportation facility or residential facility made available for the benefit of students

10

2.9 Share of SC, ST, Minority, and BPL families’ Girls-boys in enrollment is proportionate to their share in population of the habitation/neighborhood or not

11

2.10 Any overt or covert, manifest or subtle discrimination against Students of any social group or community by the teachers or peers is observed in School, and the efforts made to minimize it

11

iv

Table

No.

Title Page

No.

2.11 Number of Schools providing following facilities for access of CWSN 11 2.12 The number, gender and category-wise (SC/ST/Minorities/CWSN)

profile of out of School Students (OoSC)/Dropout Students of age group 14-16 years in preceding session (2012-13).

12,13

2.13 Results of efforts made 14 2.14 Arrangements made to hold back Students of seasonal migrant

families in School 14

2.15 If no such arrangement made, whether migration/transfer certificate is issued to such Students by the Schools?

14

2.16 Information about any special training interventions meant for the OosC

15

2.17 Number of enrolled and present students in training programme on the day of visit

15

2.18 Training programme is imparted through 15 3.1 Category-wise profile of attendance and achievement of students

category-wise (SC/ST/Minority/CWSN) Profiling of attendance and achievement (School result) of School Students in the age group of 14-16 years

16,17

3.2 Details of specific schemes available in the state for ensuring enrollment of special category students along with the assistance provided there under

18

3.3 Attendance on the visit day (Gender Gap) 18 3.4 Reasons for gaps in enrollment 19 3.5 Reasons for absenteeism (Gap in attendance) 19 3.6 Efforts made to address the gender gap attitudinal & physical 20 3.7.1 Reduction in Enrollment and reasons thereof 21 3.7.2 Reduction in attendance and reasons thereof 22,23 3.7.3 Reduction in achievement level and reasons thereof 24 4.1 Any efforts being made for the counseling of parents to handle the

problem of girls. If not why? 25

4.2 Guidance and Counseling Cell been constituted by the School or not. If yes, the available student counselor ratio

25

5.1 Availability of enabling condition 25 5.2 Availability & workability of following material/equipments 26 5.3 No. of teachers present in the school (Male & Female, vacancies

against sanctioned posts 26

v

Table

No.

Title Page

No.

5.4 Availability of teachers for each class & for teaching science, math & language

26

5.5 No .of teachers possessing professional training qualification (subject wise) as mandated & no. of untrained teachers

27

5.5.1 Maintenance of teacher’s diary including curriculum delivery and lesson Plan etc. by teachers & countersigned by the Head of the institution regularly

27

5.5.2 Availability of timetable prescribed by the School and followed by the teachers

27

5.5.3 Are discussions and group team works encouraged as a methodology of teaching for involvement of Students/students in teaching learning process?

27

5.5.4 Classroom management with reference to seating arrangement of Students

28

5.5.5 On site academic support by resource teachers in the year 2012-13 28 5.5.6 No. of Schools, which arranged zero period, extra classes for

academically weaker students 28

5.5.7 Methods of assessment & Evaluation being followed in the school/classroom

28

5.5.8 Participation level of the CWSN in classroom process & efforts made to optimize it

29

5.5.9 Nature of peer interaction with CWSN 29 5.5.10 Individualized Educational Plan (IEPs) prepared for CWSN 29 5.5.11 Availability of adequate facilities for seating CWSN 29 5.5.12 Extent & nature of use of ITC devices for teaching & learning of the

CWSN 29

5.5.13 Provisions for Training of Teachers 30 5.5.14 Physical availability of adequate and good quality facilities for in-

service training with reference to 30

5.5.15 Whether training modules are need based or not 31 5.5.16 Use of new technologies like Computer Assisted Learning CAL,

LCD, Projector etc. for imparting lessons in the classroom by teachers 31

5.5.17 Trainers/Resource persons from following institutions who imparted training

31

6.1 School Name & Year of Establishment (Civil Work) 32 6.2 Availability of classrooms for Class IX & X (Std. Size 20’x24’) 32 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 6.7

Area of the School Type of Building Physical Condition of building Any local innovative approaches in school building design Availability of Natural Light & Cross ventilation; if not, reason thereof, and the steps taken by School authorities to rectify it

33 33 33 33 34

vi

Table

No.

Title Page

No.

6.8(a) Lighting Facility in Classroom 34 6.8(b) Lighting Facility in Classroom 34 6.9 Availability & usability of following provision of alternative electric

power supply 34

6.10 Library Design- Availability of the following 35 6.11 Laboratory Design 35 6.12 Facilities for Physically Challenged (Availability of Ramps to access) 35 6.13 Availability of benches of different height in classrooms 35 6.14 Ramp’s Condition 36 6.15 Source of drinking water 36 6.16 Water Storage Facility & its condition & cleaning schedule 36 6.17 Quality of drinking water 36 6.18 Measures taken by School authority to ensure clean drinking water 36 6.19 Measures adopted for treatment & testing of water 37 6.20 Availability of sufficient numbers of drinking water taps 37 6.21 Availability of adequate numbers of urinals/lavatories students,

teachers & others 37

6.22 Maintenance/Cleanliness of toilets & supply of water 37 6.23 Availability of separate toilets for Girls 37 6.24 Provision in toilets for physically challenged students 38 6.25 Lavatories single pits/double pits attached with septic tank & cleaning

of septic tank 38

6.26(a) Availability of drainage facility 38 6.26(b) Type of Drains 38 6.26(c) 6.26(d) 6.27(a) 6.27(b) 6.27(c) 6.28(a) 6.28(b) 6.28(c) 6.28(d) 6.28(e) 6.28(f) 6.28(g) 6.28(h) 6.28(i) 6.28(j)

Structural Condition of Drain Any Instance of Water Logging Waste Water treatment/discharge/disposal of solid waste Availability of waste collection facility Availability of facility for treatment of waste & composting of organic waste Water & Energy Conservation Availability of Rain water harvesting system Condition of Rain water harvesting system Lighting facility available Teachers School management awareness about use of renewable sources of energy Source of energy Safety aspect of Building Design No. of Schools with special structural facility to cope with natural hazards The Width of the staircases is sufficient or not Disaster Preparedness Plan Available or not

38 39 39 39 39 39 39 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 41

vii

Table

No.

Title Page

No.

6.28(k) Schools with ongoing construction activity 41 6.28(l) Measures being taken by school authorities 41 6.28(m) Procurement aspects 42 7.1 Month of receiving School Annual Grant for the financial year

2012-13 in sampled Schools and status of utilization of funds 42

7.2 Status of utilization of funds with % and expenditure done as per norms of the scheme

42

7.3 Status of Utilization of School Annual Grant 43 7.4 Utilization of SAG as per norms 43 7.5 Receipt of Minor Repair Grant – (For Financial Year 2012-13) 43 7.6 Utilization of minor repair grant on repair and white-wash of the

School Building 44

7.7 Utilization of minor repair grant as per norms 44

viii

List of Tables of DEO level information

Table

No.

Title Page

No.

1. General Information. 45 2. Status of Un-served Habitation under School Mapping. 46

3. No. of New Schools Sanctioned under RMSA. 46 4. Progress (No. of Schools Functioning). 47 5. Enrolment in Functional Schools under RMSA. 47 6. School Particulars. 47 7. Schools already supported under RMSA. 47 8. Number of Schools having classes IX-X by funding under RMSA. 48 9. Schools by Category. 49

10. Teachers Sanctioned and Vacancy in Schools having classes IX-X. 50

11. Status of trained and untrained Teacher in schools having classes IX-X. 51

12. No of Secondary Schools having SMDCs. 52,53

13. Availability & usability of following provision of alternative 54 electric power supply. 14. Library Design- Availability of the following. 54 15. Laboratory Design. 55 16. Safety aspect of Building Design. 55 17. Disaster Preparedness Plan Available or not 55

18. Schools with ongoing construction activity 55 19. Total number of schools with ongoing civil work in district 56 20. Description of SMDC members 56

21. Received Training by SMDC Members 56

22. Status of DCF 56 23. Awareness of School authorities regarding importance of data collected under 57 MIS and if so, are they using it. 24. Nature of financial records and their maintenance and Bank reconciliation 57 25. Mode of transfer of funds to the SMDC from State/District level. 57 26. Type of funds/grants allocated by the district to Schools 57 27. All SMDCs in State/District are covered by audit 58

28. Display of financial information on notice board/wall of the School/office 58 for the purpose of social audit.

29. Any instance of community mobilizing resources for the School. 58 30. Status of utilization certificates submitted by SMDCs to DPO (At District Level) 59,60 31. Detail of expenditure of funds by SMDC in sampled 61

(from 15 April to till date) schools of the district 32. Month of receiving School Annual Grant for the financial year 2012-13 in 61

sampled Schools and status of utilization of funds.

33. Status of utilization of funds with % and expenditure done as per norms 61 of the scheme

34. Status of Utilization of School Annual Grant 62

35. Utilization of SAG as per norms 62 36. Receipt of Minor Repair Grant – (For Financial Year 2012-13) 62

ix

Table

No.

Title Page

No.

37. Utilization of minor repair grant on repair and white-wash of 63 the School Building

38. Utilization of minor repair grant as per norms 63 39. Details of innovative proposals undertaken during the 63 current financial year (At district level). 40. Details of innovative proposals undertaken during the 64 financial year 1st April, 2012 to 31st March, 2013 (At State level). 41. The total number of staff sanctioned category wise in DPO under RMSA and 64 the number in position 42. Personnel working on deputation/contract and their nature of engagement 64 43. Component-wise personnel at State and District level 65 44. Details of visits made by officials of DPO to district/schools along with 65 time schedule (from 1st April, 2012 to 31st March, 2013) 45. Facilities available in District level Academic Institutions 66

46. Other essential facilities 66

47. Major issues in collection and compilation of data 67

x

LIST OF TABLES OF GAJAPATI

Table

No.

Title Page

No.




69


70


Plan 71


71


71



73

1.11 2.1

Reasons for not holding last meetings and whether the same has been recorded Class & Ethnic group-wise, enrollment and attendance (On the day of Field Visit)

73

74

2.2 Physical Access – At School and Habitation’s names Category of the Schools visited

75


75


76


76


77


77


77


77


78

xi

Table

No.

Title Page

No.



79,80




81


82


82



83,84


85




92



xii

Table

No.

Title Page

No.


93


94


94


94


94


94




95


95


CWSN 96






98



100 100 100 100 101

xiii

Table

No.

Title Page

No.


power supply 101




of septic tank 105



105 105 106 106 106

106 106 106 106 107

107 107 107

107 108

xiv

Table

No.

Title Page

No.




109


School Building 111


xv


Table

No.

Title Page

No.





12. No of Secondary Schools having SMDCs. 116 12(a) Physical Condition of the Building under RMSA 116 12(b) Any local Innovative approaches in School building design 116 12(c) Lighting Facility in Classrooms 116



20(a) SMDC Particulars 119

21. Status of DCF 119 21(a) Training received teachers/head masters/Principle for filling up of DCF 119 in sampled Schools and district

22. Awareness of School authorities regarding importance of data collected under 120 MIS and if so, are they using it.

23. Nature of financial records and their maintenance and Bank reconciliation 120 24. Mode of transfer of funds to the SMDC from State/District level. 120 25. Type of funds/grants allocated by the district to Schools 120 26. All SMDCs in State/District are covered by audit 121


28. Any instance of community mobilizing resources for the School. 121 29. Status of utilization certificates submitted by SMDCs to DPO (At District Level) 121 30. Detail of expenditure of funds by SMDC in sampled 122,123

(from 15 April to till date) schools of the district 31. Month of receiving School Annual Grant for the financial year 2012-13 in 124 sampled Schools and status of utilization of funds.




xvi

Table

No.

Title Page

No. 36. Utilization of minor repair grant on repair and white-wash of 125

the School Building 37. Utilization of minor repair grant as per norms 126 38. Details of innovative proposals undertaken during the 126 current financial year (At district level). 39. Details of innovative proposals undertaken during the 126 financial year 1st April, 2012 to 31st March, 2013 (At State level). 40. The total number of staff sanctioned category wise in DPO under RMSA and 127 the number in position 41. Personnel working on deputation/contract and their nature of engagement 127 42. Component-wise personnel at State and District level 127 43. Details of visits made by officials of DPO to district/schools along with 128 time schedule (from 1st April, 2012 to 31st March, 2013) 44. Facilities available in District level Academic Institutions 129 45. Other essential facilities 129 46. Details of research projects undertaken during the 130

Year (1st April, 2012 to 31st March, 2013) 47. Details of action research carried out at district level 130

xvii

LIST OF TABLES OF KANDHAMAL

Table

No.

Title Page

No.




132


133


Plan 134


134


134



136

1.11 2.1


136

137


138


138


139


139


139


140


140


140


141

xviii

Table

No.

Title Page

No.



142,143




144


145


145



146,147


148




155



xix

Table

No.

Title Page

No.


156


156


156


157


157


157




158


158


CWSN 159






160



162 162 162 162 163

xx

Table

No.

Title Page

No.


power supply 163




of septic tank 166



167 167 167 167 168

168 168 168 168 168

168 168 169

169 169

xxi

Table

No.

Title Page

No.




171


School Building 172


xxii


Table

No.

Title Page

No.





12. No of Secondary Schools having SMDCs. 177




22. Status of DCF 180 23. Awareness of School authorities regarding importance of data collected under 181 MIS and if so, are they using it. 24. Nature of financial records and their maintenance and Bank reconciliation 181 25. Mode of transfer of funds to the SMDC from State/District level. 181 26. Type of funds/grants allocated by the district to Schools 181 27. All SMDCs in State/District are covered by audit 182


29. Any instance of community mobilizing resources for the School. 182 30. Status of utilization certificates submitted by SMDCs to DPO (At District Level) 182 31. Detail of expenditure of funds by SMDC in sampled 182






xxiii

Table

No.

Title Page

No.





48. Details of research projects undertaken during the 188 year (1st April, 2012 to 31st March, 2013)

49. Details of action research carried out at district level 189

50. Facilities available in District level Academic Institutions 189


52. Details of research projects undertaken during the year 191

xxiv

LIST OF TABLES OF RAYAGADA

Table

No.

Title Page

No.




194


194


Plan 195


195


196



197

1.11 2.1


197

198


199


199


200


200


200


201


201


201


202

xxv

Table

No.

Title Page

No.



203




205


205


205



206,207


208




215



xxvi

Table

No.

Title Page

No.


216


216


217


217


217


217




218


218


CWSN 219






220



222 222 222 222 223

xxvii

Table

No.

Title Page

No.


power supply 223




of septic tank 226



227 227 227 227 228

228 228 228 228 228

228 229 229

229 229

xxviii

Table

No.

Title Page

No.




231


School Building 232


xxix


Table

No.

Title Page

No.





12. No of Secondary Schools having SMDCs. 237




22. Status of DCF 240 23. Awareness of School authorities regarding importance of data collected under 241 MIS and if so, are they using it? 24. Nature of financial records and their maintenance and Bank reconciliation 241 25. Mode of transfer of funds to the SMDC from State/District level. 241 26. Type of funds/grants allocated by the district to Schools 242 27. All SMDCs in State/District are covered by audit 242


29. Any instance of community mobilizing resources for the School. 242 30. Status of utilization certificates submitted by SMDCs to DPO (At District Level) 243 31. Detail of expenditure of funds by SMDC in sampled 243






xxx

Table

No.

Title Page

No.





48. Details of research projects undertaken during the 249 year (1st April, 2012 to 31st March, 2013)

49. Details of action research carried out at district level 250

50. Facilities available in District level Academic Institutions 251


52. Details of research projects undertaken during the year 252

xxxi

List of Figures Ganjam Fig. No. Title Page No.

Fig. 1 Dropout Rate of Class IX

13

Fig. 2 Dropout Rate of Class X

14

Fig. 3 Reasons for Absenteeism

20

List of Figures Gajapati Fig. No. Title Page No.


80


81


87

List of Figures Kandhamal Fig. No. Title Page No.


143


144


149

List of Figures Rayagada Fig. No. Title Page No.


204


204


210

i

Executive Summary of RMSA

General Information

1. Period of Report;

2. No. of Districts Covered: Four

3. Districts’ Name: Ganjam, Gajapati, Kandhamal and Rayagada

Sl.no Indicators Ganjam Gajapati Kandhamal Rayagada

4 Month of visit:

Jun-Jul 2015

Jul-Aug 2015

Aug-Sep 2015

Oct-Nov 2015

5 Total No. of Secondary Schools: 361 131 124 164

6 No. of Secondary Schools Covered: 25 25 25 25

Boys High School 6 2 1 1

Girls High School 3 2 7 2

Co-education Schools 16 21 17 22

7 Types of Schools Visited Ganjam Gajapati Kandhamal Rayagada

A Higher Gender gap in enrolment 4 5 6 5

B High proportion of SC/ST/Minority students 5 6 5 1

C Low retention rate/Higher dropout rate 2 3 3 4

D The School with CWSN (Minimum 3 CWSN) 4 5 4 0

E The School with Low academic achievements 3 4 4 4

F The Urban School with most students of deprived sections

3 4 3 2

G The Schools located in Forest/Mountain/Remote/Desert area

2 7 0 1

H The Schools located in Flood/natural calamity prone area

2 3 4 4

Selection Criteria for Schools: All the sample schools were selected in consultation with the officials of the respective DEO office of the concerned district by following RMSA guidelines. Hence the present monitoring study covers almost all categories of schools found in the above four districts of Odisha. Further it may be mentioned that except Ganjam the other three are educationally backward districts and except urban area schools, all the schools in rural areas of Gajapati, Kandhamal and Rayagada districts may be classified under the category of schools located in educationally backward blocks (EBBs).

Consolidated Report/Executive Summary of RMSA Monitoring in Four Districts: After the 42

nd Constitutional Amendment Act 1976 education has been placed in the Concurrent

List and it is now jointly looked after by the Central and State Governments in order to improve its quality and to increase the enrolment level of boys and girls in schools for human resource development. Since 2009-10 RMSA is being implemented all over the country with a view to increasing the enrolment ratio of boys and girls in secondary level of education by increasing the appropriate infrastructures both physical and human required for quality education. Also, steps are being taken under the RMSA to reduce the dropout rate and to retain the students of disadvantaged families vulnerable to dropouts. Under the scheme the schools covered in the state are provided with special grants as well as annual grants for creation of adequate physical and human infrastructures for modern scientific education and to create conducive environment for the spread of secondary education all over the country. The present study covers the monitoring of RMSA programme in the four districts of Odisha namely Ganjam, Gajapati, Kandhamal and Rayagada during the period July to September 2015.

ii

1. Planning & Implementation:

(i) At School Level

Ganjam Gajapati Kandhamal Rayagada

1. 20(80%) schools are ensuring education facility to dropout Students

1. 18(72%) schools are ensuring education facility to dropout Students

1. 5(20%) schools are

ensuring education facility to dropout Students


ensuring education facility to dropout Students

2. 10(40%) schools

are making society aware of child rights & duties of teachers& parents

2. 12(48%) schools

are making society aware of child rights & duties of teachers& parents


making society aware of child rights & duties of teachers& parents


making society aware of child rights & duties of teachers& parents

3. 10(40%) schools

are organizing parents teachers meetings, distribution of report card and reviewing C.W./H.W.

3. 12(48%) schools

are organizing parents teachers meetings, distribution of report card and reviewing C.W./H.W.


organizing parents teachers meetings, distribution of report card and reviewing C.W./H.W.


organizing parents teachers meetings, distribution of report card and reviewing C.W./H.W.

4. 12(48%) schools

are paying attention to improvement in regular teaching learning activities.

4. 10(40%) schools

are paying attention to improvement in regular teaching learning activities.


paying attention to improvement in regular teaching learning activities.


paying attention to improvement in regular teaching learning activities.

5. 12(48%) schools

gave scholarships on time to students

5. 13(52%) schools


5. 7(28%) schools gave

scholarships on time to students

5. 14(56%) schools


6. 9(36%) schools

have prepared three years perspective Plan

6. 7(28%) schools

have prepared three years perspective Plan

6. 8(32%) schools have

prepared three years perspective Plan


prepared three years perspective Plan

7. All the schools

have made proper use of funds i.e. SAG & other grants as per norms

7. All the schools

have made proper use of funds i.e. SAG & other grants as per norms

7. All the schools have

made proper use of funds i.e. SAG & other grants as per norms

7. All the schools have

made proper use of funds i.e. SAG & other grants as per norms

8. 9(36%) schools

have done monitoring of minor & major repair work and maintenance of physical infrastructure

8. 10(40%) schools

have done monitoring of minor & major repair work and maintenance of physical infrastructure


done monitoring of minor & major repair work and maintenance of physical infrastructure


done monitoring of minor & major repair work and maintenance of physical infrastructure

2. Access - Physical Access:


1. 2 (8%) schools are located in flood prone area, 12 (48%) in cyclone prone area, 1(4%) in polluting industrial area, 1(4%) in arsenic ground water area, 3(12%)

1. 1 (4%) schools is located in flood prone area, 1(4%) in cyclone prone area, 3 (12%) on unstable slope, 2(8%) are in landslide prone area, 4(16%) schools are in

1. 1 (4%) schools is located in flood prone area, 1(4%) is in landslide prone area, 2 (8%) in drought prone area, 1(4%) in arsenic ground water area, 12 (48%) school on state

1. 5 (20%) schools are located in flood prone area, 1(4%) is on unstable slope, 2 (8%) in drought prone area,1(4%) in polluting industrial area, 4 (16%) schools in arsenic ground

iii

schools are on state highway, 3(12%) in congested market area & 3 (12%) face problem due to hilly forest area.

arsenic ground water area, 2 (8%) are in congested market area, 4(16%) schools face problem due to its location, 4 (16%) school is located on state high way & 4(12%) face problem due to hilly forest area

high way, 4 (16%) school located in Congested market area & 4(16%) schools face problem due to its location.

water area, 6 (24%) schools located on state high way, 4(16%) schools are located in congested market area, 1(4%) school faced problem due to its location & 1(4%) faces problem due to hilly forest area

2. Total 6910 students are studying in class 9th & 10th across 25 sample schools in 2014-15




3. 168 (2.58%) students cover a distance of more than 5 km to reach the school.

3. 219 (5.64%) student cover a distance of more than 5 km to reach the school.

3. 574 (9.43%) students cover a distance of more than 5 km to reach the school.

3. 1176(20.40%) students cover a distance of more than 5 km to reach the school.

4. Students of 4(16%) schools face problem enrooting to school due to river & forest.

4. Students of 13(52%) schools face problem enrooting to school due to river & forest.

4. Students of 4 (16%) schools face problem enrooting to school due to river & forest.

4. Students of 5 (20%)

schools face problem enrooting to school due to river & forest.

5. No transport facility is provided by the school



5. 2 (8%) schools provide transport facility to the students

Social Access:


1. Out of total enrolled 6910 students in class 9th & 10th , 3495(50.58%) are boys and 3415 (49.42%) are girls.




2. Of the total enrolled students in class 9th & 10th, SC students are 1912(28%), ST students- 212(3%), Minority- 14(0.2%) and Gen & OBC students- 4772(69%).

2. Of the total enrolled students in class 9th & 10th, SC students are 507(13%), ST students- 1612(42%), Minority- 233(6%) and Gen & OBC students- 1531(39%).



3. 11 CWSN students are enrolled.




4. No discrimination is seen in sample schools.




5. Total Dropout rate for 2014-15 is 0.29%.

5. Total Dropout rate for 2014-15is 0.82%.

5. Total Dropout rate for 2014-15is 2.81%.

5 .Total Dropout rate for 2014-15 is 3.80%.

iv

6.Reasons for dropout are poverty, early age entry in family-based occupation,

6.Reasons for dropout are poverty, early marriage, early age entry in family-based occupation

6.Reasons for dropout are poverty, early marriage, early age entry in family-based occupation

6. Reasons for dropout are poverty, early marriage, and lack of residential facilities for girls.

Boys & Girls in Total Enrolment of Class 9th & 10th in 2014-15

Ethnic Group and Gender-wise Dropout (%) in Sample Schools

Category Ganjam Gajapati Kandhamal Rayagada

Boys Girls Boys Girls Boys Girls Boys Girls

ST 0.00 0.00 0.63 1.53 3.90 1.83 5.03 1.27

SC 0.87 0.11 0.69 1.83 4.76 2.18 3.31 1.95

Minority 0.00 0.00 0.70 1.11 2.56 3.08 3.57 2.70

OBC/GEN 0.30 0.12 0.50 0.55 2.38 2.72 4.90 3.76

CWSN 0.00 0.00 25.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

TOTAL 0.46 0.12 0.59 1.12 3.57 2.19 4.54 2.96

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00


Boys

Girls

0

5

10

15

20

25

Boys Girls Boys Girls Boys Girls Boys Girls


ST

SC

Minority

OBC/GEN

CWSN

TOTAL

v

3. Equity:

Status of reduction/ increase in average % of enrolment in class 9th

from 2012-13 to

2013-14 Class Sampled

District SC ST MIN GEN & OBC

B G B G B G B G

9th

Ganjam -12.48 -3.35 4.55 31.91 33.33 -33.33 -10.03 -4.40

Gajapati 13.70 16.67 -3.02 -11.14 15.79 -13.11 -5.98 -14.55

Kandhamal 4.62 3.58 -0.53 10.08 37.50 77.78 -14.74 3.05

Rayagada 13.49 3.51 0.16 2.16 -13.33 -95.24 12.48 -0.60


from 2012-13 to



B G B G B G B G

10th

Ganjam 8.95 8.54 -8.06 17.86 -50.00 100.00 0.97 -7.77

Gajapati -31.07 -21.43 5.01 12.46 -8.62 -18.06 -3.83 5.05

Kandhamal 14.96 30.90 40.97 2.71 31.29 -50.94 31.86 20.42

Rayagada -6.06 5.06 6.72 8.48 43.75 31.58 -17.96 -0.21

-100

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

B G B G B G B G

SC ST MIN GEN & OBC

Status of Reduction/Increase in avg % of Enrollment in class 9th from 2012-13 to 2013-14

Ganjam

Gajapati

Kandhamal

Rayagada

vi


from 2013-14 to



B G B G B G B G

9th

Ganjam 9.98 10.30 7.04 -62.07 50.00 -50.00 -2.24 -4.87

Gajapati -21.69 -19.05 19.38 3.36 15.15 -24.53 -15.23 -2.13

Kandhamal 6.35 2.02 -3.93 3.66 -4.55 -37.50 18.85 -4.15

Rayagada -10.26 10.70 14.63 24.23 -15.38 4.55 -3.01 -1.43


from 2013-14 to



B G B G B G B G

10th

Ganjam -10.53 0.00 -3.33 46.15 33.33 -33.33 -6.91 3.67

Gajapati 29.51 32.95 -3.64 -8.45 26.42 -15.25 -5.09 -13.22

Kandhamal 13.01 9.18 4.47 15.25 -37.93 34.62 -9.87 10.00

Rayagada 8.33 5.39 4.46 6.04 -6.67 -26.67 16.63 4.25

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

B G B G B G B G

SC ST MIN GEN & OBC


Ganjam

Gajapati

Kandhamal

Rayagada

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

B G B G B G B G

SC ST MIN GEN & OBC


Ganjam

Gajapati

Kandhamal

Rayagada

vii

Average % of attendance of students in class 9th

during 2011-12 Clas

s

Sampled

District Below 50% 50-60% 60-70% 70-80% 80-90% 90-100%

B G B G B G B G B G B G

9th

Ganjam 1.08 0.51 0.36 0.28 15.21 17.19 26.13 23.00 30.82 30.44 26.39 28.58

Gajapati 1.14 2.80 0.00 0.00 16.27 13.89 29.86 26.74 27.26 32.54 25.47 24.04

Kandhamal 1.39 1.84 2.19 2.22 14.23 15.76 24.09 20.90 27.37 30.50 30.73 28.78

Rayagada 1.51 1.10 2.41 1.03 19.36 19.85 32.99 33.38 24.19 22.65 19.54 21.99

Average % of attendance of students in class 10th during 2011-12

Clas

s

Sampled

District Below 50% 50-60% 60-70% 70-80% 80-90% 90-100%


10th

Ganjam 0.12 0.00 0.36 0.21 14.59 15.36 25.59 22.73 32.52 31.47 26.81 30.23

Gajapati 1.90 1.34 0.00 0.00 16.18 17.03 29.47 30.66 29.47 32.97 22.98 18.00

Kandhamal 1.17 1.12 2.66 1.04 12.86 11.76 31.88 22.66 28.48 30.28 22.95 33.13

Rayagada 1.68 1.13 1.33 1.66 19.78 20.12 28.40 29.62 27.91 24.83 20.90 22.65

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

B G B G B G B G

SC ST MIN GEN & OBC


Ganjam

Gajapati

Kandhamal

Rayagada

0

10

20

30

40


Below 50% 50-60% 60-70% 70-80% 80-90% 90-100%

Average % of attendance of students in class 9th during2011-12

Ganjam

Gajapati

Kandhamal

Rayagada

viii


during 2012-13 Cla

ss

Sampled

District Below 50% 50-60% 60-70% 70-80% 80-90% 90-100%


9th

Ganjam 0.57 0.91 0.15 0.06 16.50 24.11 25.73 27.94 28.31 23.26 28.73 23.71

Gajapati 0.88 1.64 0.00 0.00 16.49 13.10 28.13 26.51 30.95 35.01 23.54 23.75

Kandhamal 1.10 1.19 1.38 1.25 12.24 17.35 24.28 23.36 30.33 26.17 30.67 30.68

Rayagada 1.59 0.86 1.59 1.33 20.98 20.05 32.55 28.97 19.81 28.66 23.48 20.13


during 2012-13 Clas

s

Sampled

District Below 50% 50-60% 60-70% 70-80% 80-90% 90-100%


10th

Ganjam 0.06 0.00 0.23 0.06 17.14 19.72 26.72 23.37 29.71 30.71 26.16 26.14

Gajapati 0.80 1.02 0.09 0.00 16.73 13.45 26.33 27.91 31.41 34.01 24.64 23.62

Kandhamal 1.24 0.90 1.65 1.73 14.42 15.39 21.11 20.65 26.78 30.03 34.81 31.31

Rayagada 1.83 1.22 1.61 1.22 18.29 20.30 27.65 26.16 29.99 32.37 20.63 18.72

0

10

20

30

40


Below

50%

50-60% 60-70% 70-80% 80-90% 90-100%


Ganjam

Gajapati

Kandhamal

Rayagada

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40


Below 50% 50-60% 60-70% 70-80% 80-90% 90-100%


Ganjam

Gajapati

Kandhamal

Rayagada

ix


during 2013-14 Cla

ss

Sampled

District Below 50% 50-60% 60-70% 70-80% 80-90% 90-100%


9th

Ganjam 1.19 0.35 0.68 0.24 15.79 17.28 26.97 26.06 30.83 31.13 24.53 24.94

Gajapati 0.98 1.13 0.00 0.00 16.95 14.97 26.76 26.08 30.60 33.11 24.71 24.72

Kandhamal 2.08 1.16 2.08 1.51 11.11 16.10 27.38 22.50 31.97 24.65 25.38 34.07

Rayagada 2.11 1.33 1.53 0.78 16.93 17.65 28.12 28.24 28.63 29.65 22.68 22.35


during 2013-14 Clas

s

Sampled

District Below 50% 50-60% 60-70% 70-80% 80-90% 90-100%


10th

Ganjam 0.16 0.06 0.55 0.24 16.58 16.10 26.93 24.75 29.83 29.22 25.94 29.64

Gajapati 0.66 0.22 0.00 0.11 17.34 16.67 25.77 26.60 29.24 31.46 26.99 24.94

Kandhamal 1.32 0.95 1.24 0.88 11.79 20.30 27.23 18.81 32.58 25.46 25.83 33.60

Rayagada 1.60 0.75 1.14 1.34 18.24 21.64 24.92 29.57 29.03 27.40 25.08 19.30

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35


Below 50% 50-60% 60-70% 70-80% 80-90% 90-100%


Ganjam

Gajapati

Kandhamal

Rayagada

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35


Below 50% 50-60% 60-70% 70-80% 80-90% 90-100%


Ganjam

Gajapati

Kandhamal

Rayagada

x


during 2014-15 Clas

s

Sampled

District Below 50% 50-60% 60-70% 70-80% 80-90% 90-100%


10th

Ganjam 0.22 0.24 0.61 0.54 15.51 14.81 25.90 24.88 32.63 34.89 25.13 24.64

Gajapati 0.90 1.42 0.00 0.00 17.49 17.57 25.56 26.30 33.18 30.54 22.87 24.17

Kandhamal 1.76 0.99 1.69 1.69 11.42 16.71 29.05 24.21 28.51 23.05 27.57 33.35

Rayagada 3.16 1.18 2.23 1.25 16.07 17.67 29.16 26.96 26.92 29.31 22.46 23.63


during 2014-15 Clas

s

Sampled

District Below 50% 50-60% 60-70% 70-80% 80-90% 90-100%


10th

Ganjam 0.06 0.00 0.29 0.29 16.57 14.54 25.47 25.19 31.49 28.51 26.12 31.48

Gajapati 0.28 0.59 0.00 0.00 18.65 14.37 26.90 25.89 32.93 31.59 21.24 27.55

Kandhamal 1.63 1.87 2.25 1.69 11.15 16.27 25.64 19.82 32.15 27.47 27.19 32.89

Rayagada 1.38 1.43 1.38 1.27 22.23 21.80 24.64 27.21 31.93 30.39 18.44 17.90

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35


Below 50% 50-60% 60-70% 70-80% 80-90% 90-100%


Ganjam

Gajapati

Kandhamal

Rayagada

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35


Below 50% 50-60% 60-70% 70-80% 80-90% 90-100%


Ganjam

Gajapati

Kandhamal

Rayagada

xi

Status of reduction/increase in average % of students scoring 60% & above in class 9th

from 2011-12 to 2012-13 Class Sampled


B G B G B G B G

9th

Ganjam 2.49 2.27 5.16 -3.22 -33.33 0.00 4.62 5.25

Gajapati 10.07 -6.38 -0.33 4.21 18.00 19.90 10.41 2.38

Kandhamal 3.26 4.93 5.74 15.48 0.00 0.00 2.59 1.16

Rayagada 4.83 0.71 2.42 1.33 0.00 0.00 7.42 5.64

Status of reduction/ increase in average % of students scoring 60% & above in class 10th



B G B G B G B G

10th

Ganjam 1.48 0.92 3.68 -9.13 -50.00 0.00 4.09 0.30

Gajapati 8.47 -3.48 -0.45 5.83 15.69 11.79 10.28 1.97

Kandhamal 2.40 5.52 8.22 16.67 0.00 0.00 4.96 -2.50

Rayagada 2.40 0.67 2.92 1.69 0.00 0.00 3.98 4.94

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35


Below 50% 50-60% 60-70% 70-80% 80-90% 90-100%


Ganjam

Gajapati

Kandhamal

Rayagada

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

B G B G B G B G

SC ST MIN GEN & OBC

Status of Reduction/Increase in avg % of students scoring 60% & above in class 9th from 2011-12 to 2012-13

Ganjam

Gajapati

Kandhamal

Rayagada

xii

Status of reduction/ increase in average % of students scoring 60% & above in class 9

th



B G B G B G B G

9th

Ganjam -0.73 -2.37 -2.26 -5.06 16.67 -33.33 -8.19 1.34

Gajapati -3.37 0.11 -2.12 -3.43 -2.42 2.85 -8.36 -4.48

Kandhamal -4.02 -1.85 -5.90 1.02 -4.76 0.00 -3.36 -1.89

Rayagada 1.18 -1.16 -4.02 2.34 0.00 -5.00 1.92 -1.53

Status of reduction/ increase in average % of students scoring 60% & above in class 10th



B G B G B G B G

10th

Ganjam 0.56 -2.50 -3.25 -19.11 33.33 -33.33 -8.02 0.59

Gajapati -5.85 -3.04 -1.55 -2.33 -1.08 0.65 -8.80 -4.66

Kandhamal -4.56 -1.92 -7.49 0.69 -9.09 0.00 -2.65 -2.14

Rayagada -0.52 -1.27 -4.25 3.89 0.00 -8.33 0.44 -1.87

-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

B G B G B G B G

SC ST MIN GEN & OBC


Ganjam

Gajapati

Kandhamal

Rayagada

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

B G B G B G B G

SC ST MIN GEN & OBC


Ganjam

Gajapati

Kandhamal

Rayagada

xiii

4. Guidance and Counselling:


1. None of the sample schools has cell for guidance & counselling.




5. Quality:

(I). Enabling Conditions:


1. Cross ventilation is available in 22(88%) schools out of 25 schools.




2. 16(64%) schools have desk chairs in adequate numbers for students.




3. Black boards are appropriately located in 24(96%) schools.




4. Library room with appropriate books is available in 3(12%) schools.




5. Integrated Sci lab with equipment & materials are available in 1(4%) schools




-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

B G B G B G B G

SC ST MIN GEN & OBC


Ganjam

Gajapati

Kandhamal

Rayagada

xiv

6. 49(15.12%) posts of teachers of class 9th & 10th are lying vacant as 275 teachers are placed against 324 sanctioned posts.




7. None of the sample schools has adequate number of teachers to teach science and math and only in 2 schools language teachers are available to teach the languages.

7. Teachers for science are placed in 2(8%) schools, for math in 2(8%) and for language in 2(8%) schools.



8. All the teachers of the 25 sample schools maintain their daily dairy



8. Teachers of the 23(92%) sample schools maintain their daily dairy

0

20

40

60

80

100

Desk-chair Sci Lab Sci & Math

Kit

Library with

appropriate

books

Black Board

Status of Enabling Conditions in Schools

Ganjam

Gajapati

Kandhamal

Rayagada


15.1214.49

12.45

13.81

Vacancies of Teachers in Sampled Schools for class 9th & 10th

xv

9. All the sample schools arrange zero period class for academically weak students.

9. 16(64%) of the sample schools arrange zero period calss for academically weak students.

9. All the sample schools arrange zero period class for academically weak students.

9. 20(80%) of the sample schools arrange zero period class for academically weak students.

10. None of the sample schools has prepared IEP for CWSN.




(II). Teacher’s Training:


1. Only 3 teachers out of 275 teachers in place across the 25 sampled schools have not received training under RMSA.

1. All the 236 teachers in place across the 25 sampled schools have received training under RMSA

1. All the 211 teachers in place across the 25 sampled schools have received training under RMSA.

1. All the 206 teachers in place across the 25 sampled schools have received training under RMSA.

6. Civil Work:


1. No school is run in rented building.




2. 12(48%) schools have crack in building, 1(4%) has dampness problem, 9(36%) have seepages & 3(12%) have damages in plaster.

2. 5(20%) schools have crack in building, none has dampness problem, 15(60%) have seepages & 5(20%) have damages in plaster.

2. 9(36%) schools have crack in building, 2(8%) have dampness problem, 9(36%) have seepages & 5(20%) have damages in plaster.

2. 15(60%) schools have crack in building, 2(8%) have dampness problem, 4(16%) have seepages & 4(16%) have damages in plaster.

3. Lighting facility is available in 23(92%) schools.




4. All the 25(100%) schools have own




0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Cracks Dampness Seepages Damages in

Plaster

Existing Defects % in Building Sampled Schools

Ganjam

Gajapati

Kandhamal

Rayagada

xvi

sources of drinking water.




5. Quality of drinking water is satisfactory in 16(64%) schools.




6. Maintenance, cleanliness & supply of running water in toilets exist in 23(92%) schools.




Ongoing Construction Activity:


1. 4(16%) schools are having ongoing construction activities.




7. Community Mobilization /Participation:


1. SMDC meetings are being held quarterly in 24(96%) schools.




1

Ganjam District

The Backdrop

Ganjam district is one of the coastal districts in the southern part of Odisha. The district is bounded by Nayagarh district in the North, Kandhamal district in the West, Srikakulam district of Andhra Pradesh and Gajapati district in the South and Puri, Khordha district and Bay of Bengal is in its East. The district has a total geographical area of 8206 sq. km. The district constitutes 5.27 per cent of the state’s land area and area-wise it is the 5

th

largest district of Odisha. It lies between 19˚ 0’ to 20˚ 17’ North Latitude and 84˚ 09’ to 85˚ 11’ east Longitude.

As compared to the state’s average population density, Ganjam District is found to be one of the densely populated districts of Odisha. According to 2011 Census the average population density per sq. km area in Ganjam district is 430, whereas it is 270 at the all-Odisha level. The district was having a total population of 35, 29,031 persons in 2011. Out of that the rural population was 27, 61,030 (78.2%) persons and the urban population was 768,001 (21.8%) persons. The sex ratio of population in the district was 983 females per 1000 males, as compared to 979 females per 1000 males at the all-Odisha level. The social composition of population in the district is as follows: SC (19.5%), ST (3.4%), and others (77.1%). Thus, the composition of weaker/disadvantaged section population in the district is lower than the all-Odisha level, which is about 40% of the total (SC-17.1% and ST-22.8%).

The Administrative headquarters of the Ganjam district is located at Chhatrapur town, though Berhampur is one of prominent town where most of government offices are located. The administrative set up of the district consists of: three sub-divisions, 22 tahasils and 22 blocks, 475 Gram Panchayats, 17 Notified Area Councils (NAC) and 37 Police Stations. There are 3,212 villages in the district out of which 2,812 villages are inhabited and rest 400 villages are uninhabited.

The climatic condition of Ganjam district is much varied. The average annual rainfall of the district is 1276.2 mm (Odisha Agriculture Statistics 2011-12, P-1). However there is a great variation of rainfall from year to year. The work participation rate of population in the district is 42.6 per cent, marginally higher as compared to 41.8 per cent at the all-Odisha level. The per cent of main workers and marginal workers to total workers during 2011 constituted 60.0 and 40.0 respectively. Among the workers 19.0 per cent are cultivators, 37.7 per cent are agricultural labourers, 3.7 per cent are household industry workers and 39.6 per cent are other categories of workers. It is found that the agriculture dependent workers are marginally lower than the state average, which is 56.7 per cent as compared to 61.8 per cent at the all-Odisha level.

According to 2011 Census Ganjam district has an overall literacy rate of 71.1 per cent, which is lower than the state’s literacy rate of 72.9 per cent. Hence, it is necessary to improve the educational level of population, not merely literacy rate for absorption of the younger generation in the non-farm sector economy and in skill-based occupations. The literacy rate in rural segment is 67.6 per cent as compared to 70.2 per cent at the state-level. Similarly, the urban literacy rate in Ganjam district is 83.3 per cent in 2011 whiles the state level literacy rate is 85.7 per cent. The district has a huge potential for development of industries because the people of Ganjam are famous for their hard work and outmigration to work in the industrial sector of Surat and its vicinity in Gujarat. The Gopalpur Port, Tata

2

Steel Complex, Indian Rare Earth Limited (IRE) will promote the future economy of the district by creating more value chains. The district has quite a few numbers of government, government-aided and private institutes to promote technical and higher education for building of quality manpower to absorb them in the growing non-farm sector economy.

This, of course, necessitates increase in enrolment ratio and marked reduction of dropout ratio at the primary and secondary level of education. After the passing out of Right to Education Act by the Government of India many popular programmes are now being implemented all over the country to increase the level of enrolment of young boys and girls both at the primary and secondary level through Sarva Shikshya Abhiyan (SSA) and Rashtriya Madhyamika Shikshya Abhiyan (RMSA).

In view of this, in order to find out the efficacy of the RMSA programme presently being implemented in all parts of Odisha and the country in general to increase the enrolment ratio of young boys and girls at their secondary level of education and to improve its quality content for development of human capital in both quantitative and qualitative terms, the present monitoring study critically analyses the status of RMSA in Ganjam district of Odisha.

1. Planning & Implementation

Table-1.1

Perspective plan for the school Districts No. of Schools Plan developed Not developed

Yes No

Ganjam 25(100.00) 25 0

Remarks: All the sample schools of the district have prepared perspective plan for the development of the school. However, it is observed by the monitoring team that in some of the schools perspective plans are prepared in a very casual and non-scientific manner. The SMDC members do not have any involvement in the preparation of school’s perspective plan.

Table-1.2

Data base/sources adopted/taken for planning and plan preparation at school level

other than SEMIS Districts No. of Schools Other Data base/sourced adopted If yes names of other sources

Yes No

Ganjam 25 0 25(100.00) -

Remarks: None of the sample school has used/adopted other data base or sources for preparation of the school’s perspective plan other than SEMIS.

Table-1.3

Whether disadvantaged groups have been appropriately factored in the Plan? District No. of Schools Developed Planning strategy for disadvantaged groups

Yes No

Ganjam 25 0 25(100.00)

If not reasons thereof: No separate budget for above purposes has made in favour of the high schools.

Remarks: The social composition of population in the district is as follows: SC (19.5%), ST (3.4%), others (77.1%). Thus, the composition of weaker/disadvantaged section population in the district is lower than the all-Odisha level, which is about 40% of the total (SC-17.1% and ST-22.8%). The rate of illiteracy is very high among the SCs and STs and the level of education among the literate section of population is found to be equally low. Notwithstanding that the DEO at the district level has not thought of devising appropriate

3

action plan to increase the level of enrolment of SC and ST students according to their population share in the catchment area of the school. Similarly, there is no special plan at the school level to increase the enrolment as well as retention rate of girls and minority section of population although the level of dropout among them is higher vis-à-vis OBCs and general category students.

Table-1.4

Adoption of convergence approach with schemes/resources of other departments in

school plan Districts No. of Schools Convergence approach adopted

Yes No

Ganjam 25 25(100.00) 0

Remarks: According to the statement of the headmaster, convergence approach of various line departments such as water and sanitation, health, social welfare, rural development and public works department etc exists in namesake only. The officials of various line departments in the district do not show much concern for development of infrastructure in the secondary schools by converging their plans and programme.

Table-1.5

Convergence approach Sl.No. Departments

No of Schools %

1 Water & Sanitation 18 72

2 Social Welfare 19 76

3 Tribal Development 0 0

4 Minority Department 0 0

5 Rural Development 14 56

Urban Development 11 44

6 Health, Medical and Family welfare 14 56

7 Electricity department 23 92

8 Transport (Roadways) 0 0

9 Public Works Department 0 0

10 Others 25 100

Remarks: It may be perused from Table 1.5 that depending upon their nature of requirement many sample schools of the district have approached line departments for convergence with their programmes for the development of education at the school level. Among the sample schools, the convergence level with various line departments of the district is found to be as follows: social welfare- 76%, water and sanitation- 72%, health, medical and family welfare department- 56%, electricity department- 92%, rural development department-56% and urban development department-44%.

Table-1.6

Incorporation of SMDC recommendations in the School Development Plan District No. of

Schools (%) School Development

Plan Prepared Recommendations incorporated in School

Development Plan

Yes No Yes No

Ganjam 25(100.00) 25(100.00) 0(0.00) 25(100.00) 0(0.00)

If not reasons thereof – Not applicable If not reasons thereof – Not applicable

Remarks: It is mentioned by all the sample schools that the recommendations given by SMDC relating to development of school and achievement level of students have been duly incorporated in the school development plan. However, the proper scrutiny of school records by the Monitoring team reveals that the SMDC shows very little interest in holding regular

4

meetings and they hardly make any concrete proposal for strengthening school infrastructure and teaching quality to improve learning achievement level of students.

Table-1.7

Roles assigned to the SMDCs for implementing the scheme and to seek help &

cooperation in ensuring the execution of following in sampled schools S.No. Roles Responses regarding assigning

roles (No. of Schools & %)

1 Filling of DCF of U-DISE 25 (100.00)

2 Preparation & Implementation of Annual Plan 25 (100.00)

3 Admission of Students to Class-9 25 (100.00)

4 Regular attendance and retention of students 25 (100.00)

5 Regularity & Punctuality in teachers’ attendance 25 (100.00)

6 Civil work 4 (16.00)

7 Providing resources Physical 25 (100.00)

Human 25 (100.00)

8 Organizing cultural, sports events, functions 25 (100.00)

9 Mid-day-meal 25 (100.00)

10 Preparing annual accounts of income &expenditure of SMDC

25 (100.00)

11 Any other -

Remarks: It is seen from Table 1.7 that the SMDC in the entire sample schools of Ganjam district has been doing all assigned roles. Also, in four sample schools where civil work is undertaken that is being supervised by the SMDC. The civil work is mostly executed at the DEO level by assigning the construction work to rural development department. There is no mid-day meal provision for Class IX and Class X students. However, as most of the secondary schools in Odisha are having provision for enrolment of Class VIII students also, mid-day meal is arranged for Class VIII students and the SMDC plays a role in organization of mid-day meal programme at the school level.

Table-1.8 Clarity amongst SMDC members about their roles, if yes, detail of steps taken by them

accordingly.

District No. of Schools (%) SMDC members are clear about their roles

% Not clear %

Ganjam 25(100) 25 100 0 0

Remarks: It is seen from Table 1.8 that the SMDC members of the entire sample schools are clear about their roles. All SMDC members, however, do not participate actively in the meeting although they are aware of their roles. It is further found from SMDC register at the school level that the SMDC meetings are hardly organized as per scheduled time. The Head Masters of the schools report that parents do not come for the meeting every month. As a result, they are organizing the SMDC meeting in most of the cases of the sample schools two to four times in an academic year. It is also revealed by the Head Masters that some of the members belonging to poor and weaker sections depend upon wage work for their subsistence and they do not get time to attend the SMDC meetings. The monitoring team feels that all the proceedings and approval given on various matters are usually initiated and drafted by the Head Master of the school and the members of SMDC simply put their signatures for approval at a later date.

5

Table-1.9

Steps taken by SMDC Members (Number of schools with %) Sl No Steps taken by SMDC members accordingly Ganjam

1 Ensuring education facility to dropout Students 20 (80)

2 Making society aware of child rights & duties of teachers& parents

10 (40)

3 Organizing parents teachers meetings, distribution of report card and reviewing C.W./H.W.

10 (40)

4 Keeping check on private tuitions by teachers, paying attention to academic progress of students

Nil

5 Identification of CWSN & taking care of availability of facilities to CWSN students

Nil

6 Paying attention to improvement in regular teaching learning activities.

12 (48)

7 Distribution of free text books Nil

8 Availability of scholarships on time to students 12 (48)

9 Preparing three years’ perspective Plan 9 (36)

10 Proper use of funds i.e. SAG & other grants as per norms

25 (100)

11 Monitoring of minor & major repair work and maintenance of physical infrastructure

9 (36)

12 Seeking knowledge and information about income and expenditure of SMDC and supervising the accounts thereof.

15 (60)

Remarks: It is seen from Table 1.9 that 48 per cent of the sample schools the SMDC members are paying attention to improvement in regular teaching learning activities. Various roles expected to be performed by SMDC members relating to development of the school and students are carried out by them in a very lackadaisical manner. Checking dropout rate of students is very important and the SMDC has to play very proactive role in this regard. However, it is found that in 20 (80%) schools out of 25 in the sample the members have taken some interest to prevent dropouts among students. The SMDCs in all the sample schools make efforts for proper use of funds i.e. SAG & other grants as per norms, 40 per cent of them organise parents’ teachers meetings, distribution of report card and reviewing C.W. /H.W., 60% of SMDCs seeking knowledge and information about income and expenditure of SMDC and supervising the accounts thereof. Availability of scholarships on time to students is monitored by 48% of SMDC. Preparing three years’ perspective Plan and monitoring of minor & major repair work and maintenance of physical infrastructure are coordinated by only 36 per cent of SMDC. In none of the district’s school steps are being taken by SMDC to check private tuitions by school teachers, distribution of free text books and none takes interest in identification and facilitation of enrolment of CWSN students. This shows that the members of SMDC require adequate capacity building training to make them aware about their roles and responsibilities and attitudinal change to strengthen secondary level education and the requisite infrastructures for overall development.

6

Table-1.10

Meetings of General Body of School Management and Development Committee District Meetings of General body held

Quarterly Half Yearly Annually No meeting held till date

Ganjam Number of Schools 24 - - 1

25 % (96.00) - - (4.00)

Remarks: There is a provision under RMSA scheme to hold SMDC meeting on quarterly basis. Accordingly, out of 25 sample schools, 24 (96%) schools have arranged quarterly meeting and one (4%) school has not conducted the meeting as per the guidelines. However, the perusal of SMDC register of the schools by the monitoring team has revealed that participation of parents in the General Body meeting is very low. Even the parents those who remain present in all such meetings merely act as passive audience. Hardly anybody raises any issue pertaining to learning-achievement level of students or about holistic development of schools and their students. The official members of some of the sample schools have found to have conducted SMDC in the absence of other representatives belonging to local community.

Table-1.11

Reasons for not holding last meetings and whether the same has been recorded (NA)

District Mentioned Not Mentioned

Ganjam Number of Schools NA NA

25 %

Remarks: The General Body meeting of the SMDC is regularly being held on quarterly basis. However, in seven of the sample schools which hold general body meeting of SMDC without the local representatives, reason for such non-adherence to norm was not mentioned.

7

2. Access

Table-2.1

Class & Ethnic group-wise, enrolment and attendance (On the day of Field Visit) Class SC ST Minority

Boys Girls Total Boys Girls Total Boys Girls Total

E P E P E P E P E P E P E P E P E P

IX 531

(100.00) 425

(80.04) 407

(100.00) 329

(80.84) 938

(100.00) 754

(80.38) 49

(100.00) 31

(63.27) 51

(100.00) 37

(72.55) 100

(100.00) 68

(68.00) 6

(100.00) 5

(83.33) 4

(100.00) 2

(50.00) 10

(100.00) 7

(70.00)

X 527

(100.00) 406

(77.04) 431

(100.00) 311

(72.16) 958

(100.00) 717

(74.84) 51

(100.00) 38

(74.51) 29

(100.00) 23

(79.31) 80

(100.00) 61

(76.25) 6

(100.00) 5

(83.33) 2

(100.00) 1

(50.00) 8

(100.00) 6

(75.00)

Total 1058

(100.00) 831

(78.54) 838

(100.00) 640

(76.37) 1896

(100.00) 1471

(77.58) 100

(100.00) 69

(69.00) 80

(100.00) 60

(75.00) 180

(100.00) 129

(71.67) 12

(100.00) 10

(83.33) 6

(100.00) 3

(50.00) 18

(100.00) 13

(72.22)

Note: E- Enrolled, P-Present Comment: Out of 6516 students enrolled in class IX and X, 5192(79.68%) students were present on the respective day of visit to 25 secondary schools under the study. Among the boys and girls the attendance percentages were respectively 80.62 and 78.69 of their total enrolment. It may be seen from Table 2.1 that among the various social categories the attendance percentage of boys is better than the girls except in the case of ST and CWSN students. Among the various social categories attendance level among the ST students is 71.67%, SC students-77.58% and general & other categories students- 80.94%. Of course, the district has a low percentage of socially disadvantaged population- SC-19.5%, and ST- 3.4%, whereas the percentage of ST and SC enrolment both in class IX and X together is 31.86 of the total. This is higher than their proportionate share to the district’s population. This further implies that the enrolment level among the SC and ST students in the sample schools of the district is reasonably good.

Class Gen&Others CWSN Total

Boys Girls Total Boys Girls Total Boys Girls Total

E P E P E P E P E P E P E P E P E P

IX 1096

(100.00) 903

(82.39) 1132

(100.00) 903

(79.77) 2228

(100.00) 1806

(81.06) 2

(100.00) 1

(50.00) 0

(100.00) 0

(0.00) 2

(100.00) 1

(50.00) 1682

(100.00) 1364

(81.09) 1594

(100.00) 1271

(79.74) 3276

(100.00) 2635

(80.43)

X 1078

(100.00) 883

(81.91) 1116

(100.00) 890

(79.75) 2194

(100.00) 1773

(80.81) 1

(100.00) 0

(0.00) 1

(100.00) 1

(100.00) 2

(100.00) 1

(50.00) 1662

(100.00) 1332

(80.14) 1578

(100.00) 1225

(77.63) 3240

(100.00) 2557

(78.92)

Total 2174

(100.00) 1786

(82.15) 2248

(100.00) 1793

(79.76) 4422

(100.00) 3579

(80.94) 3

(100.00) 1

(33.33) 1

(100.00) 1

(100.00) 4

(100.00) 2

(50.00) 3344

(100.00) 2696

(80.62) 3172

(100.00) 2496

(78.69) 6516

(100.00) 5192

(79.68)

8

Table-2.2

Physical Access – At school and habitation’s names category of the schools visited

Sl. No.

Categories Ganjam

Number of Schools

%

1 EBB 0 0.00

2 Urban 7 19.44

3 CWSN (Minimum 3 CWSN) 4 11.11

4 Higher Gender gap 4 11.11

5 SC/ST/Minority students abundance 5 13.89

6 Low retention rate/Higher dropout rate 2 5.56

7 Schools situated in habitation with large number of OoSC 0 0.00

8 Low academic achievements 3 8.33

9 Schools situated in habitation of seasonal migrants 0 0.00

10 Urban Schools with most students of deprived sections 3 8.33

11 Forest/Mountain/Remote/Desert area 2 5.56

12 Flood/natural calamity prone area 2 5.56

13 Ongoing civil work 4 11.11

14 School with girls hostel 0 0.00

Total 36 100.00

N.B.: The number of schools visited for monitoring in the district is 25. However, some of the schools could be classified under two three/categories simultaneously such as urban schools, schools having high SC/ST/Minority students, schools with ongoing civil work, schools having low academic achievement, schools with higher gender gap, urban schools with most students of deprived sections, schools located in flood/natural calamity prone area and the like. Hence, the total number of schools shown in the Table is 36 for the district in place of 25. Remarks: In Ganjam district almost all categories of schools are included in the sample for monitoring purpose in consultation with the DEO. However, it is seen that, this district has no educationally backward block (EBB); none of the sample schools could be covered under the habitation with large number of OoSc (Out of School Children), school with girls’ hostel and along with this district does not have any conspicuous problem of seasonal migration.

9

Table-2.3

Location of the school adjacent to or within any of the following sensitive areas.

Sl. No.

Area

Ganjam

Number of Schools Situated

%

1 Protected area (National Park, Wild life sanctuary) 0 0.00

2 Flood prone /flood plain area 2 8.00

3 Earthquake prone zone 0 0.00

4 Unstable slope 0 0.00

5 Landslide prone Area 0 0.00

6 Erosion Prone Area 0 0.00

7 Cyclone prone Area/ Storm surge prone Area 12 48.00

8 Drought prone Area 0 0.00

9 Polluting Industrial Area 1 4.00

10 Mining Area 0 0.00

11 Arsenic /fluoride contaminated ground water area 1 4.00

12 Busy National/State Highway 3 12.00

13 Congested urban/market/commercial area 3 12.00

14 Any particular disturbance faced by School due to its location

1 4.00

15 Hilly Forest 2 8.00

Total 25 100.00

Remarks: The table reveals that 12 of the sample schools (48%) are located in cyclone prone area/ storm surge prone area, three schools (12%) in busy National/State Highway; three schools (12%) in congested urban/market/commercial area, two schools (8%) in flood prone/flood plain area; two schools (8%) in Hilly Forest Area. Similarly, one school (4%) each is located in Arsenic/fluoride contaminated ground water area, Polluting Industrial Area and facing disturbance problem due to its location.

Table-2.4

Names and categories of the feeder primary and upper primary schools in sampled

district District School Level No. of Schools managed by

Govt. % Private %

Ganjam PS 2 2.78 0 0

UPS 70 97.22 0 0

Total 72 100.00 0 0

Remarks: The sample schools of the district have 2.78 per cent government primary schools and 97.22 per cent government upper primary schools as feeder schools and no feeder schools belongs to private management such as Saraswati Sishu Mandir, Aurobindo Integrated School, and Vivekananda Sikhya Kendra, etc in the sample study area.

Table-2.5

Number of students enrolled in school from habitations coming from a distance greater

than what is prescribed for a neighbourhood school. (2014-15) Sl.No. Distance of school from habitation Number of students (%)

1 0-1 km. 5166(79.29)

2 1-3 km. 1071(16.43)

3 3-5 km. 111(1.70)

4 More than 5 km. 168(2.58)

Total 6516 (100.00)

10

Remarks: Out of total 6516 students enrolled in the 25 sample schools, more than three-fourth of the students coming from within one kilometre distance. Out of total enrolled students 95.72 per cent of them are coming from a distance of not more than three kilometres, whereas 2.58 per cent of the total students are coming from a distance more than five kilometres. It is found that some of the schools covered in the samples are distinguished for their quality education, higher achievement level of students, better infrastructural facilities and better care of students residing in hostels. So, parents prefer to admit their students in such schools notwithstanding long distance from their habitation. But in some cases students are coming from a distance of more than five kilometres due to non-availability of schools within in the prescribed distance.

Table-2.6

Presence of any natural or man-made barrier that poses any problem for the students in

accessing the school. Districts

No. of Schools Natural/ Man

made No

Ganjam 25 4 21

% (100.00) (16.00) (84.00)

Remarks: Twenty-one (84%) of the sample schools in the district have no natural or man-made barrier that poses any problem for the students in accessing the school. Only four of the sample schools are having natural barrier due to forests, rivers, etc and the wretched condition of kutcha road.

Table-2.7

Name and distance of the nearest secondary school (Govt. /Pvt.) from the habitation the

school is located at, and catchments area of the school. Distance from School/Catchments area

District No. of schools Less than 1 km. 1-3 km. 3-5 km. More than 5 km.

Ganjam 25 4 10 8 3

% (100.00) (16.00) (40.00) (32.00) (12.00)

Remarks: It is found that 16% of the schools in the sample are located within a distance of less than 1 km and another 40% of them within a distance of 1-3 km. That means more than 50% of the schools in the district is having catchment area of less than 3 km. However, at the same time 32% of schools are located within a radius of 3-5 km and the rest 12 per cent of the schools located at a distance of more than five kilometres.

Table 2.8

Any special arrangement like transportation facility or residential facility made

available for the benefit of students. Facility available in Schools

Ganjam

Yes No

Transport 0 (0.00)

25 (100.00)

Residential 0 (0.00)

25 (100.00)

Remarks: There is no transportation and residential facility available in all the 25 sample schools. Due to nearer location and easy to travel up and down from one’s own residence none of the schools is providing transport facility to the students.

11

Table-2.9

Share of SC, ST, Minority, and BPL families’ girls-boys in enrolment is proportionate

to their share in population of the habitation/neighbourhood or not. Ganjam

Proportionate

No. of Schools yes no

25 N.A N.A

% -- --

Remarks: Information relating to school enrolment level of SC, ST, Minority and BPL families’ girls and boys, whether in proportion to their share in population of the habitation/neighbourhood could not be made available from the school records. However, from informal level discussion held with the teachers and members of SMDC it was found that the rate of enrolment of boys, girls, and SC, ST and minority category students is almost in proportion to the respective category of population at the entry level.

Table-2.10

Any overt or covert, manifest or subtle discrimination against students of any social

group or community by the teachers or peers is observed in school, and the efforts made

to minimize it. No. of Schools Discrimination No discrimination

By teachers By peers

Ganjam 0(0.00) 0(0.00) 25(100.00)

Remarks: The monitoring team did not find any case of discrimination on the ground of caste, community, religion or gender by students or teachers in the study area.

Table-2.11

Do the overall conditions prevalent in schools facilitating access of CWSN to secondary

schools. If not, the details of obstructions and barriers. Number of Schools providing following facilities for access of CWSN

Facility Number of Schools

Ganjam %

Proper ramps with hand rail 6 24.00

Western toilet seat 2 8.00

Special furniture in classroom Nil

Tricycle Nil

Escort Nil

Other (Specify) Nil

Remarks: It is found that only in six (24%) schools out of 25 are found to be having proper ramps with handrail for access of CWSN students. Similarly, only in two of the schools there is western toilet seat for the use of CWSN students. However, none of the schools is having any special furniture, tricycle or escort facility for the use of CWSN students. It may further be noted that quite a few of the sample schools in the district do not have adequate number of desk and bench as well as toilets for the use of normal category students- boys and girls. So, in this situation as there are very few CWSN category students found admitted in the schools making special provision for them at the school level has not been feasible except construction of ramps with handrail.

12

Out of School Students (OoSC)/Dropout Students of Age Group 14-16 years. (At School

Level):

Table-2.12

The number, gender and category-wise (SC/ST/Minorities/CWSN) profile of out of

school students (OoSC)/dropout students of age group 14-16 years in preceding session

(2014-15).

Category Class

OoSC/Dropout of age group 14-16 years

Total

drop out %

Enrolled

boys

Boys

drop out %

Enrolled

girls

Girls

drop out %

Total

enrolled

SC IX 561 6 1.07 466 1 0.21 1027 7 0.68

X 475 3 0.63 410 0 0.00 885 3 0.34

Total 1036 9 0.87 876 1 0.11 1912 10 0.52

ST IX 71 0 0.00 29 0 0.00 100 0 0.00

X 60 0 0.00 52 0 0.00 112 0 0.00

Total 131 0 0.00 81 0 0.00 212 0 0.00

Minority IX 6 0 0.00 2 0 0.00 8 0 0.00

X 3 0 0.00 3 0 0.00 6 0 0.00

Total 9 0 0.00 5 0 0.00 14 0 0.00

Gen & OBC IX 1161 2 0.17 1171 2 0.17 2332 4 0.17

X 1158 5 0.43 1282 1 0.08 2440 6 0.25

Total 2319 7 0.30 2453 3 0.12 4772 10 0.21

CWSN IX 3 0 0.00 3 0 0.00 6 0 0.00

X 4 0 0.00 1 0 0.00 5 0 0.00

Total 7 0 0.00 4 0 0.00 11 0 0.00

Total IX 1799 8 0.44 1668 3 0.18 3467 11 0.32

X 1696 8 0.47 1747 1 0.06 3443 9 0.26

Grand total 3495 16 0.46 3415 4 0.12 6910 20 0.29

Name of category with higher dropout No.& % Number % SC - 10 out of1912 0.52 OBC/Gen - 10 out of 4772 0.21 ST - 0 out of 212 0.00 Min- 0 out of 14 0.00

Gender with higher dropout

Category Boys % Girls %

ST 0 out of 131 0.00 0 out of 81 0.00

SC 9 out of 1036 0.87 1out of 876 0.11

Minority 0 out of 9 0.00 0 out of 5 0.00

OBC/GEN 7 out of 2319 0.30 3 out of 2453 0.12

CWSN 0 out of 7 0.00 0 out of 4 0.00

TOTAL 16 out of 3495 0.46 4 out of 3415 0.12

Remarks: Dropout rate of students in class IX and X is 0.29 per cent in sample schools of Ganjam district during the year 2014.15. It is higher among the boys (0.46%) vis-à-vis the girls (0.125%). However, the dropout rate among girls in OBC and General Category is highest 0.12 per cent, followed by the S.C girls (0.11%). The dropout rate among the boys is highest among SC i.e. 0.87 % followed by OBC and General Category 0.36 per cent

13

Reasons for dropout: According to 2011 Census Ganjam District has an overall literacy rate of 71.1 per cent. The 2011 census gender-wise literacy rate of Ganjam is 81.0% for the males and 61.1% for the females, significantly lower than the State, which is 72.9% - 81.6% for the males and 64.0% for the females. Notwithstanding this, it is found that the overall dropout rate of students at the secondary level is only 0.29%. a)The main reason for dropout among the SC, OBC and General Category boys is mostly due to poverty and eagerness of parents to impart their wards with traditional skill and knowledge required for following family-based occupation at an early age. Many poor parents ask their children to keep themselves engaged in wage-based work at a very tinder age by migrating out from the village. b) In case of SC and backward class students, early marriage is one of the factors for drop out at secondary level of education. c) In the case of failure of agriculture and drought, many parents divert to other activities for which they migrate to different cities /towns causing drop out of their children. d) Another cause of dropouts in the surveyed districts is poor learning achievement level of students and failures in class test before appearing secondary board examination in Class X and Ganjam district is no exception.

(Fig-1)

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

SC ST Minority Gen & OBC CWSN

Community wise as well as Genderwise Dropout rate of Class IX of Ganjam District

Boys

Girls

Total

14

(Fig-2)

Table-2.13

Results of efforts made (2014-15) Name of dist.

Class-9 Class-10

No. of drop out students

No. of drop out brought back to School

% No. of drop out students

No. of drop out brought back to School

%

Ganjam 11 Nil 0.00 9 Nil 0.00

Remarks: No effort has been made by the school authority or the SMDC of the sample schools of the district to bring back the dropout students to complete their education.

Table-2.14

Arrangements made to hold back students of seasonal migrant families in school.

Ganjam

Arrangement No. of School %

Seasonal Hostels 0 0.00

Any other arrangement 0 0.00

No arrangement 0 0.00

Remarks: None of the sample schools has the problem of retaining students of seasonal migrants, as the district as such does not have any problem of seasonal migration of families. So, the school authority does not require making any special arrangement to retain the enrolled children of seasonally migrating out parents.

Table-2.15

If no such arrangement made, whether migration/transfer certificate is issued to such

students by the schools? (NA)

Ganjam District

issuing TC

No. of Schools Yes No

0 NA

% -- --

Remarks: There is no need of issuing any migration/transfer certificate to the students, as none of the sample schools has students having seasonally migrating out parents.

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

SC ST Minority Gen & OBC CWSN

Community wise as well as Genderwise Dropout rate of Class X of Ganjam District

Boys

Girls

Total

15

Table-2.16

Information about any special training interventions meant for the Oosc No. of Schools

Special trainings started

Yes No

,,

% ,,

Name of Trainings

1 Nil

2 Nil

3 Nil

4 Nil

5 Nil

Remarks: None of the sample schools in the district has conducted special training interventions to enrol out of school children at the secondary level.

Table-2.17

Number of enrolled and present students in training programme on the day of visit Ganjam

Boys Girls Total

Enrolled 0 0 0

Present 0 0 0

% 0.00 0.00 0.00

Remarks: None of the sample schools in the district of Ganjam has taken any special steps on training intervention measures for enrolment of out of school children.

Table-2.18

Training programme is imparted through

Ganjam

Total No. of schools conducting training Trainers No. of School %

0 Regular teachers 0

NIOS 0

SIOS 0

Remarks: None of the sample schools has conducted any training programme for out of school children.

16

3. Equity

General Information

Table-3.1

Category-wise (SC/ST/Minority/CWSN) profile of attendance and achievement of students (school result)

in the age group of 14-16 years.

Ganjam 2011-12

Class SC ST MINO. CWSN Gen/OBC TOTAL


9 Enrolled 528 387 72 30 3 1 2 2 1337 1356 1940 1774

Avg. % of Attend. 72 74 73 75 80 82 0 0 85 86 75 78

Appeared in Exam 514 384 72 30 3 1 2 2 1328 1350 1917 1765

% 97.35 99.22 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 99.33 99.56 98.81 99.49

Above 60% 42 23 2 2 1 0 0 0 229 222 274 247

% 8.17 5.99 2.78 6.67 33.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.24 16.44 14.29 13.99

Below 60% 472 361 70 28 2 1 2 2 1099 1128 1643 1518

% 91.83 94.01 97.22 93.33 66.67 100.00 100.00 100.00 82.76 83.56 85.71 86.01

10 Enrolled 391 295 46 15 3 4 0 2 1205 1138 1645 1452

Avg. % Attend. 74 76 77 76 80 82 80 0 86 88 78 80

Appeared in Exam 355 261 45 13 2 2 0 1 1092 1024 1494 1300

% 90.79 88.47 97.83 86.67 66.67 50.00 0.00 50.00 90.62 89.98 90.82 89.53

Above 60% 44 24 3 2 1 0 0 0 231 224 279 250

% 12.39 9.20 6.67 15.38 50.00 0.00 0.00 0 21.15 21.88 18.67 19.23

Below 60% 311 237 42 11 1 2 0 1 861 800 1215 1050

% 87.61 90.80 93.33 84.62 50.00 100.00 0.00 100 78.85 78.13 81.33 80.77

17

Ganjam 2012-13

Class SC ST MINO. CWSN General/OBC TOTAL


9 Enrolled 568 432 63 32 2 4 3 2 1306 1282 1939 1750

Avg. % of Attend. 76 77 74 75 80 81 80 82 85 87 78 80

Appeared in Exam 563 424 63 29 2 4 3 2 1299 1277 1927 1734

% 99.12 98.15 100.00 90.63 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 99.46 99.61 99.38 99.09

Above 60% 60 35 5 1 0 0 0 0 284 277 349 313

% 10.66 8.25 7.94 3.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 21.86 21.69 18.11 18.05

Below 60% 503 389 58 28 2 4 3 2 1015 1000 1578 1421

% 89.34 91.75 92.06 96.55 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 78.14 78.31 81.89 81.95

10 Enrolled 478 375 67 23 3 0 2 2 1226 1331 1774 1729

Avg. % Attend. 77 74 73 77 80 82 0 0 88 90 82 83

Appeared in Exam 447 356 58 16 2 0 1 0 1129 1258 1636 1630

% 93.51 94.93 86.57 69.57 66.67 0.00 50.00 0.00 92.09 94.52 92.22 94.27

Above 60% 62 36 6 1 0 0 0 0 285 279 353 316

% 13.87 10.11 10.34 6.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25.24 22.18 21.58 19.39

Below 60% 385 320 52 15 2 0 1 0 844 979 1283 1314

% 86.13 89.89 89.66 93.75 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 74.76 77.82 78.42 80.61

Remarks:

It is seen from the Table 3.1 that the enrolment rate among the ST boys, Minority boys and General/OBC boys and girls has started decreasing at Class IX level of the district. The overall enrolment of students at Class IX level has diminished from 3714 in 2011-12 to 3689 in 2012-13 and class X students increased from 3097 to 3503 during the corresponding period. This may be probably due to opening up of new secondary schools in the catchment area of the sample schools and craze of well-to-do parents for English medium education of their wards in the mushrooming private schools of the district. This needs proper investigation. The community level enrolment of students is almost in proportion to their respective share of population in the total population of the district. Interestingly the enrolment rate of SC and ST students in 9th and 10th classes were 1601and 163 out of total 6811 enrolled during 2011-12 and this respectively constituted 23.51 per cent and 2.39 per cent of the total enrolment. This further rose to 1853 (25.76%) SC and 245 (3.41%) ST students out of 7192 students enrolled during 2012-13.The per cent of SC and ST population in Ganjam is respectively 17.1 and 3.4 during 2011 census. This shows that there is a rising trend in the educational level of SC and ST population. Similarly, the average percentage of attendance among the girls is higher than the boys in all communities of the district. However, the percentage of students securing above 60% marks in Class examinations is found to be although relatively higher among the boys as compared to the girls except class X boys during 2011-12, the overall class level performance of students in the district is not so satisfactory, as around 20% of the students have secured 60% and above in Class level examinations during 2011-12 and 2012-13 academic years.

18

Table-3.2

Details of specific schemes available in the state for ensuring enrolment of special

category students along with the assistance provided there under Category Type of scheme Ganjam

SC Stipend 25

Bi-Cycle 25

School Uniform 25

ST Stipend 25

Bi-Cycle 25

School Uniform 25

Minority Stipend 5

Bi-Cycle 5

School Uniform 5

Girls Stipend 0

Bi-Cycle 25

School Uniform 25

Remarks: The state has made provision to extend various benefits to special category students through various schemes in order to increase their enrolment rate at the secondary level and all those benefits are available for the students of sample schools of the district studied by the monitoring team. All SC/ST categories of students in all 25 sample schools are covered under stipend scheme, bicycle scheme and school uniform scheme. Also, similar benefits are provided to the minority students found enrolled in five schools of the sample. However, the general category girl students do not get any stipend. They get bicycle and free school uniform as per the state government’s provision.

Gender Gap

Table-3.3

Attendance on the visit day (2014-15) Class 2014-15 Ganjam

B G

IX

Enrolled 1799 1668

Attendance on the visit day 1397 1317

Avg. % of Attend on the visit day 77.65 78.96

Appeared in Exam NA NA

Above 60% 348 254

% 24.91 19.29

Below 60% 1049 1063

% 75.09 80.71

X

Enrolled 1696 1747

Attendance on the visit day 1368 1249

Avg. % of Attend on the visit day 80.66 71.49

Appeared in Exam NA NA

Above 60% 349 284

% 25.51 22.74

Below 60% 1019 965

% 74.49 77.26

19

Remarks: It is found that the total enrolment of boys is higher than the girls in the current academic year 2014-15. There is an enrolment level of 977 girls for every 1000 boys. This is very dismal figure than the prevailing sex ratio of male and female population of the district as well as the state. It may be mentioned here that while the average sex ratio is 979 females per 1000 males at the all-Odisha level according to 2011 Census, it is 983 in the case of Ganjam district. So, there is gender gap in enrolment. Early marriage of girls and drop-out after primary/upper primary level is the major factor for lower enrolment of girls at the high school level. However, the attendance percentage of girls is almost at par with the boys. But, the performance level of boys both at Class IX and X level is better than the girls.

Table-3.4

Reasons for gaps in enrolment Reason Ganjam

Respondent /districts

%

a Socio Cultural/Reasons 3 13.04

b Economic Reasons 12 52.17

c Linguistic Reasons 0 0.00

d Environmental 0 0.00

e Any Other 8 34.79

Total 23 100.00

Remarks: It is found that the main reason for gap in enrolment of boys and girls of the district is poor economic condition of the parents. The poor and illiterate parents believe that boys are breadwinners of the family and the girls are required to be married at an early age. Early marriage of girls in SC/ST and some backward communities also contribute to dropout of girls before completion of secondary education.

Table-3.5

Reasons for absenteeism (Gap in attendance)

Reasons for absenteeism

District Health Socio-cultural issue

Sibling Care

HH Responsibility

Family Issues

Earning for livelihood

Migration

Any Other

Total with %

Ganjam 25 (100)

1 (4)

8 (32)

23 (92)

2 (8)

16 (64)

1 (4)

2 (8)

25 (100)

Remarks: The principal reasons for absenteeism among both the boys and girls across different communities are found to be health problem. Another major reason for absenteeism of girls in both Class IX and X as revealed from the field report that they are assigned household responsibilities and take care of their younger siblings during the period of rooting and harvesting. Further, it is found that some students remain absent in the class due to their compulsion for earning their livelihood.

20

(Fig-3)

Table-3.6

Efforts made to address the gender gap attitudinal & physical District Physical

barriers Attitudinal Linguistic

barriers Economical barriers

No Total with %

Ganjam 0 0 0 0 25 (100)

25 (100)

Remarks: At the school or SMDC level no efforts are being made to bridge the gender gap in enrolment.

0.00

50.00

100.00

Reasons for Absenteeism of Ganjam District

21

Table-3.7.1

Reduction in enrolment and reasons thereof Ganjam

SC ST MINO. General/OBC Total CWSN

Class B G Total B G Total B G Total B G Total B G Total B G Total

2012-13

IX 568 432 1000 63 32 95 2 4 6 1306 1282 2588 1939 1750 3689 3 2 5

X 478 375 853 67 23 90 3 0 3 1226 1331 2557 1774 1729 3503 2 2 4

2013-

14

IX 505 418 923 66 47 113 3 3 6 1187 1228 2415 1761 1696 3457 3 2 5

X 525 410 935 62 28 90 2 4 6 1238 1235 2473 1827 1677 3504 2 2 4

Gap in

%

IX -12.48 -3.35 -8.34 4.55 31.91 15.93 33.33 -33.33 0.00 -10.03 -4.40 -7.16 -10.11 -3.18 -6.71 0.00 0.00 0.00

X 8.95 8.54 8.77 -8.06 17.86 0.00 -50.00 100.00 50.00 0.97 -7.77 -3.40 2.90 -3.10 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00

2013-14

IX 505 418 923 66 47 113 3 3 6 1187 1228 2415 1761 1696 3457 3 2 5

X 525 410 935 62 28 90 2 4 6 1238 1235 2473 1827 1677 3504 2 2 4

2014-15

IX 561 466 1027 71 29 100 6 2 8 1161 1171 2332 1799 1668 3467 3 3 6

X 475 410 885 60 52 112 3 3 6 1158 1282 2440 1696 1747 3443 4 1 5

Gap in %

IX 9.98 10.30 10.13 7.04 -62.07 -13.00 50.00 -50.00 25.00 -2.24 -4.87 -3.56 2.11 -1.68 0.29 0.00 33.33 16.67

X -10.53 0.00 -5.65 -3.33 46.15 19.64 33.33 -33.33 0.00 -6.91 3.67 -1.35 -7.72 4.01 -1.77 50.00 -100.00 20.00

Remarks: There is reduction in overall enrolment rate between the year 2012-13 and 2014-15. Tis may be due to opening up of new secondary schools in the catchment area of the sample schools and migration of economically better off students of to the private schools like Saraswati Shishu Mandir in recent years.

22

Table-3.7.2

Reduction in attendance and reasons thereof

2011-12 Total

Enrolment

Attendance in Percentage

Below 50 50-60 60-70 70-80 80-90 90-100

Cl – IX

Boys 1940

(100.00) 21

(1.08) 7

(0.36) 295

(15.21) 507

(26.13) 598

(30.82) 512

(26.39)

Girls 1774

(100.00) 9

(0.51) 5

(0.28) 305

(17.19) 408

(23.00) 540

(30.44) 507

(28.58)

Total 3714

(100.00) 30

(0.81) 12

(0.32) 600

(16.16) 915

(24.64) 1138

(30.64) 1019

(27.44)

Cl – X

Boys 1645

(100.00) 2

(0.12) 6

(0.36) 240

(14.59) 421

(25.59) 535

(32.52) 441

(26.81)

Girls 1452

(100.00) 0

(0.00) 3

(0.21) 223

(15.36) 330

(22.73) 457

(31.47) 439

(30.23)

Total 3097

(100.00) 2

(0.06) 9

(0.29) 463

(14.95) 751

(24.25) 992

(32.03) 880

(28.41)

G Total

Boys 3585

(100.00) 23

(0.64) 13

(0.36) 535

(14.92) 928

(25.89) 1133

(31.60) 953

(26.58)

Girls 3226

(100.00) 9

(0.28) 8

(0.25) 528

(16.37) 738

(22.88) 997

(30.91) 946

(29.32)

Total 6811

(100.00) 32

(0.47) 21

(0.31) 1063

(15.61) 1666

(24.46) 2130

(31.27) 1899

(27.88)

2012-13

Cl – IX

Boys 1939

(100.00) 11

(0.57) 3

(0.15) 320

(16.50) 499

(25.73) 549

(28.31) 557

(28.73)

Girls 1750

(100.00) 16

(0.91) 1

(0.06) 422

(24.11) 489

(27.94) 407

(23.26) 415

(23.71)

Total 3689

(100.00) 27

(0.73) 4

(0.11) 742

(20.11) 988

(26.78) 956

(25.91) 972

(26.35)

Cl – X

Boys 1774

(100.00) 1

(0.06) 4

(0.23) 304

(17.14) 474

(26.72) 527

(29.71) 464

(26.16)

Girls 1729

(100.00) 0

(0.00) 1

(0.06) 341

(19.72) 404

(23.37) 531

(30.71) 452

(26.14)

Total 3503

(100.00) 1

(0.03) 5

(0.14) 645

(18.41) 878

(25.06) 1058

(30.20) 916

(26.15)

G Total

Boys 3713

(100.00) 12

(0.32) 7

(0.19) 624

(16.81) 973

(26.21) 1076

(28.98) 1021

(27.50)

Girls 3479

(100.00) 16

(0.46) 2

(0.06) 763

(21.93) 893

(25.67) 938

(26.96) 867

(24.92)

Total 7192

(100.00) 28

(0.39) 9

(0.13) 1387

(19.29) 1866

(25.95) 2014

(28.00) 1888

(26.25)

2013-14

Cl – IX

Boys 1761

(100.00) 21

(1.19) 12

(0.68) 278

(15.79) 475

(26.97) 543

(30.83) 432

(24.53)

Girls 1696

(100.00) 6

(0.35) 4

(0.24) 293

(17.28) 442

(26.06) 528

(31.13) 423

(24.94)

Total 3457

(100.00) 27

(0.78) 16

(0.46) 571

(16.52) 917

(26.53) 1071

(30.98) 855

(24.73)

23

2013-14 Total

Enrolment

Attendance in Percentage

Below 50 50-60 60-70 70-80 80-90 90-100

Cl – X

Boys 1827

(100.00) 3

(0.16) 10

(0.55) 303

(16.58) 492

(26.93) 545

(29.83) 474

(25.94)

Girls 1677

(100.00) 1

(0.06) 4

(0.24) 270

(16.10) 415

(24.75) 490

(29.22) 497

(29.64)

Total 3504

(100.00) 4

(0.11) 14

(0.40) 573

(16.35) 907

(25.88) 1035

(29.54) 971

(27.71)

G Total

Boys 3588

(100.00) 24

(0.67) 22

(0.61) 581

(16.19) 967

(26.95) 1088

(30.32) 906

(25.25)

Girls 3373

(100.00) 7

(0.21) 8

(0.24) 563

(16.69) 857

(25.41) 1018

(30.18) 920

(27.28)

Total 6961

(100.00) 31

(0.45) 30

(0.43) 1144

(16.43) 1824

(26.20) 2106

(30.25) 1826

(26.23)

2014-15

Cl – IX

Boys 1799

(100.00) 4

(0.22) 11

(0.61) 279

(15.51) 466

(25.90) 587

(32.63) 452

(25.13)

Girls 1668

(100.00) 4

(0.24) 9

(0.54) 247

(14.81) 415

(24.88) 582

(34.89) 411

(24.64)

Total 3467

(100.00) 8

(0.23) 20

(0.58) 526

(15.17) 881

(25.41) 1169

(33.72) 863

(24.89)

Cl – X

Boys 1696

(100.00) 1

(0.06) 5

(0.29) 281

(16.57) 432

(25.47) 534

(31.49) 443

(26.12)

Girls 1747

(100.00) 0

(0.00) 5

(0.29) 254

(14.54) 440

(25.19) 498

(28.51) 550

(31.48)

Total 3443

(100.00) 1

(0.03) 10

(0.29) 535

(15.54) 872

(25.33) 1032

(29.97) 993

(28.84)

G Total

Boys 3495

(100.00) 5

(0.14) 16

(0.46) 560

(16.02) 898

(25.69) 1121

(32.07) 895

(25.61)

Girls 3415

(100.00) 4

(0.12) 14

(0.41) 501

(14.67) 855

(25.04) 1080

(31.63) 961

(28.14)

Total 6910

(100.00) 9

(0.13) 30

(0.43) 1061

(15.35) 1753

(25.37) 2201

(31.85) 1856

(26.86)

Remarks: Table 3.7.2 depicts the number of boys and girls in class IX and X who attended classes in

different percentage slabs of total classes conducted during 2010-11 to 2014-15. The percentage of

enrolled students who attended less than 50 per cent of classes conducted during the period was less

than one and the students who attended below 60 per cent of classes remain less than two percent of

the total strength of respective classes. It is found that the percentage students with more than 80 per

cent attendances constituted more than 50 per cent except the girl students in class IX during the year

2012-13. More number of students remaining absent from the school with less than 70 per cent

attendance in an academic year affects the overall learning achievement level of students. However,

such category of students is less than 20 per cent of their respective total strength during the period

under consideration. Absenteeism in the schools of Ganjam district is possibly due to poor health of

children and poverty compelling many of them to earn their living while learning. It is reported that

the poor students often remain absent from the school to do wage work or to assist their parents in

farm-based activities. Whereas the percentage students with more than 70 per cent attendances is

more or less remained 75 per cent and above during 2011-12 to 2014-15.

24

Table-3.7.3

Reduction in achievement level (in %) and reasons thereof Year Class SC ST MINO. General/OBC Total CWSN

B G Total B G Total B G Total B G Total B G Total B G Total

2011-12

9 42 (8.17)

23 (5.99)

65 (7.24)

2 (2.78)

2 (6.67)

4 (3.92)

1 (33.33)

0 (0.00)

1 (25.00)

229 (17.24)

222 (16.44)

451 (16.84)

274 (14.29)

247 (13.99)

521 (14.15)

0

0

0

10 44

(12.39)

24

(9.20)

68

(11.04)

3

(6.67)

2

(15.38)

5

(8.62)

1

(50.00)

0

(0.00)

1

(25.00)

231

(21.15)

224

(21.88)

455

(21.50)

279

(18.67)

250

(19.23)

529

(18.93)

0

0

0

2012-13

9 60 (10.66)

35 (8.25)

95 (9.63)

5 (7.94)

1 (3.45)

6 (6.52)

0 (0.00)

0 (0.00)

0 (0.00)

284 (21.86)

277 (21.69)

561 (21.78)

349 (18.11)

313 (18.05)

662 (18.08)

0

0

0

10 62 (13.87)

36 (10.11)

98 (12.20)

6 (10.34)

1 (6.25)

7 (9.46)

0 (0.00)

0 (0.00)

0 (0.00)

285 (25.24)

279 (22.18)

564 (23.63)

353 (21.58)

316 (19.39)

669 (20.48)

0

0

0

Gap in %

9 2.49 2.27 2.39 5.16 -3.22 2.60 -33.33 0.00 -25.00 4.62 5.25 4.94 3.82 4.06 3.93 0 0 0

10 1.48 0.92 1.17 3.68 -9.13 0.84 -50.00 0.00 -25.00 4.09 0.30 2.13 2.90 0.16 1.55 0 0 0

2013-14

9 32 (6.49)

35 (8.39)

67 (7.36)

8 (12.12)

4 (8.51)

12 (10.62)

0 (0.00)

1 (33.33)

1 (16.67)

213 (18.11)

219 (17.91)

432 (18.01)

253 (14.56)

259 (15.33)

512 (14.94)

0

0

0

10 35 (7.13)

38 (9.72)

73 (8.28)

9 (16.36)

5 (21.74)

14 (17.95)

0 (0.00)

1 (33.33)

1 (20.00)

215 (18.36)

223 (18.58)

438 (18.47)

259 (15.07)

267 (16.51)

526 (15.77)

0

0

0

2014-15

9 32

(5.77)

28

(6.02)

60

(5.88)

7

(9.86)

1

(3.45)

8

(8.00)

1

(16.67)

0

(0.00)

1

(12.50)

115

(9.92)

225

(19.25)

340

(14.60)

155

(8.65)

254

(15.26)

409

(11.83)

0

0

0

10 35 (7.69)

29 (7.21)

64 (7.47)

8 (13.11)

1 (2.63)

9 (9.09)

1 (33.33)

0 (0.00)

1 (16.67)

117 (10.34)

227 (19.17)

344 (14.85)

161 (9.75)

257 (15.80)

418 (12.75)

0

0

0

Gap in %

9 -0.73 -2.37 -1.48 -2.26 -5.06 -2.62 16.67 -33.33 -4.17 -8.19 1.34 -3.40 -5.90 -0.07 -3.10 0 0 0

10 0.56 -2.50 -0.81 -3.25 -19.11 -8.86 33.33 -33.33 -3.33 -8.02 0.59 -3.62 -5.32 -0.72 -3.02 0 0 0

Remarks: There is an improvement in overall achievement level of students in terms of students securing 60% and more in class examinations over the years 2011-12 and 2012-13 except in the case of ST and Minority students. But there is a reduction in the achievement level during the year 2013-14 and 2014-15. It is further observed from Table 3.7.3 that the performance among the minority and ST students has decreased during 2013-14 and 2014-15. But performance of boys has deteriorated more than the girls except SC/ST girls, which may be due to their occasional engagement in wage work to supplement family income for subsistence. The reduction in achievement during 2013-14 and 2014-15 is more pronounced among the ST girls and boys may be due to economic and cultural obstacles.

25

Guidance and Counselling

At School Level

Table-4.1

Any efforts being made for the counselling of parents to handle the problem of girls. If

not why? District Counselling of parents done

Total Yes % No %

Ganjam 19 76 6 24 25(100%)

Remarks: Out of 25 schools in the sample in 19 schools (76%) counselling of parents is regularly being done to handle the problem of girl students, whereas in six schools (24%) no counselling is done for the parents. It is reported by the Head Master and teachers of the schools that parents due to their illiteracy, ignorance and poor economic condition do not take any interest in the education of their daughters. Early marriage of girls among the SC, ST, and some categories of OBC discourage parents to provide secondary level education to their daughters as they apprehend that it will be difficult for them to get educated grooms in their community.

Table-4.2

Whether Guidance and Counselling Cell has been constituted by the school or not? If

yes, the available student counsellor ratio No. of Schools Guidance & Counselling Cell Constituted

Total District Yes % No %

Ganjam 0 0 25 100 25(100%)

Remarks: None of the schools in the sample has constituted guidance and counselling cell for students to assist them in their day to day academic matters as well as socio-economic matters.

5. Quality

1. Enabling Conditions: At School Level

Table-5.1

Availability of following enabling condition Natural Light &

Ventilation Black Board located in classroom

Bulb/CFL

District

Yes No Total with %

Yes No Total with %

Bulb Tube/CFL NA Total with %

Ganjam 21 (84)

4 (16)

25 (100)

24 (96)

1 (4)

25 (100)

21 (84)

2 (8)

2 (8)

25 (100)

Remarks: Natural Light and proper ventilation facility for the classroom and office is available in 21 (84%) of the sample schools. All sample schools except one school are provided with proper location of black boards in the class room. Similarly, 84 per cent of the schools use bulbs and 8 per cent use CFL/tube light for the proper lighting of the class rooms.

26

Table-5.2

Availability & workability of following material/equipments

Material/Equipment’s Yes No Total

Teaching Aids 25 (100)

0 25 (100)

Desk/Chair for students 16 (64)

9 (36)

25 (100)

Integrated Science lab with equipment & material 1 (4)

24 (96)

25 (100)

Art & Craft Rooms 0 25 (100)

25 (100)

Library with appropriate books 3 (12)

22 (88)

25 (100)

Remarks: Although all the sample schools in the district are reported to be having teaching aid materials, those are found to be inadequate for quality teaching. All the 25 sample schools except one do not have integrated Science lab with equipment & materials. Similarly, while 16 (64%) in the sample have adequate number of desk/chair for students, none of them is having art and craft rooms and only three (12%) of them are having library with appropriate books.

Table-5.3

No. of teachers present in the school (male &female vacancies against sanctioned posts) Teachers in position No. of teachers present on the

day of visit Sanctioned

post Vacancies against sanctioned posts

District Male Female Total with %

Male Female Total with %

Ganjam 133 (48.36)

142 (51.64)

275 (100)

133 (48.36)

142 (51.64)

275 (100)

324 49 (15.12)

Remarks: It is found that out of total sanctioned posts of 324 in the sampled schools of the district 15.12 per cent of the posts are lying vacant at present. Out of total teachers in position 48.36 per cent are male teachers and 51.64 per cent are female teachers and all of them were found present on the respective day of visit to the schools by the monitoring team.

Table-5.4

Availability of teachers for each class & for teaching science, math & language

Sufficient teachers available to teach

Science Math Language

District Yes No Total with %

Yes No Total with %

Yes No Total with %

Ganjam 0 25 (100)

25 (100)

0 25 (100)

25 (100)

2 (8)

23 (92)

25 (100)

Remarks: All 25 sample schools in the district have reported that they do not have adequate number of science teachers to teach science and to teach mathematics. That apart, it is reported that 23 (92%) out of 25 schools do not have adequate number of language teachers to teach languages like Hindi and Sanskrit.

27

Table-5.5

Number of teachers possessing professional training qualification (subject-wise) as

mandated and number of untrained teachers District No. of trained

teacher No. of untrained teachers

Total

Ganjam 272 (98.91)

3 (1.09)

275 (100)

Remarks: Out of total filled in position of teachers in the sample schools of the district, 272 (98.91%) teachers are reported to be possessing professional training and qualifications in the respective subject taught by them in the classroom, whereas the rest 3 (1.0%) teachers do not have professionally training qualification.

II. Teaching Learning Process

Table-5.5.1

Maintenance of teacher’s diary including curriculum delivery and lesson plan etc. by

teachers & countersigned by the Head of the institution regularly Diary maintained by teacher& countersigned by HM regularly


Ganjam 25 100 0 0 25 (100%)

Remarks: The Timetable prepared and prescribed by the school authority is regularly followed by the teachers while delivering lessons to the student in all of the sample schools of the district. The teachers of all sampled schools maintain their teaching diary and prepare their lesson plan as per course curriculum and get those duly signed by their Head Masters.

Table-5.5.2

Availability of timetable prescribed by the school and followed by the teachers. Time table available in school & followed by teachers


Ganjam 25 100 0 0 25 (100%)

Remarks: The Timetable prepared and prescribed by the school authority is regularly followed by the teachers while delivering lessons to the students in all the sample schools of the district.

Table-5.5.3

Are discussions and group team works encouraged as a methodology of teaching for

involvement of students/students in teaching learning process? Discussion & group team work encouraged


Ganjam 18 72 7 28 25 (100%)

Remarks: In 18 (72%) out of 25 sample schools of the district the teachers involve the students in teaching-learning process by encouraging discussions and group team works. Shortage of teaching staff is one of the contributory factors for not conducting discussions in group/team.

28

Table-5.5.4

Classroom management with reference to seating arrangement of students.

Students made to sit in small groups

Students of disadvantaged & with disability sit separately

Students have role in classroom management

District Yes % No % Yes % No % Yes % No %

Ganjam 0 0 25 100 0 0 25 100 25 100 0 0

Remarks: There is not a single school in the sample where it is possible for the teachers to make the students sit in small groups in the classroom. In none of the sample schools the students with disadvantaged and with disability are made to sit separately for better attention of teachers. However, in all the sample schools of the district the students are asked to play a role in classroom management.

Table-5.5.5

On site academic support by resource teachers in the year 2012-13

Avg. frequency of visits of resource teachers Avg. time spent by resource teachers

Nature of support provided

District

Monthly Bi-monthly

Quarterly

Half Yearly

Yearly

No

Ganjam 0 0 0 0 0 25(100) NA NA

Remarks: None of the sample schools of the district has the resource teachers to provided academic support to the students.

Table-5.5.6

Number of schools, which arranged zero period, extra classes for academically weaker

students

No. of schools arranged zero classes, extra classes

Result thereof

District Yes No Total with % 1. Improvement in learning achievement level of students in subject wise. Ganjam 25(100) 0 25(100)

Remarks: It is found that in all the 25 sample schools of the district the teachers have arranged zero period extra classes for academically weaker students to increase retention and to improve their learning achievement level subject-wise during 2012-13 and 2013-14.

Table-5.5.7

Methods of assessment and evaluation being followed in the school/classroom

Methods of Assessment & Evaluation Total with %

District

Unit test/monthly & half yearly test

CCE CCE & Unit test

Manual Evaluation

No

Ganjam 25(100) 0 0 25 (100%) 0 25(100)

Remarks: All the sample schools of the district follow unit test as well as monthly and half yearly test for regular evaluation and assessment of their students’ learning achievement level. However, all of them follow manual evaluation method.

29

Table-5.5.8

Participation level of the CWSN in classroom process and efforts made to optimize it No. of schools with CWSN participation

level in class Efforts made to optimize participation of CWSN in class


Ganjam 5 (20)

20 (80)

25 (100)

1. Remedial classes. 2. Arrangement of group discussion. 3. Special attention in the classroom.

Remarks: Out of 25 schools in the sample in five (20%) numbers of schools have made provision for CWSN category students and for improvement of their learning achievement level they arrange remedial classes, organize group discussions and give them special attention in the classroom.

Table-5.5.9

Nature of peer interaction with CWSN No. of schools in peer interaction with CWSN

District Neutral Taunting Teasing Bullying Friendly NA Total with %

Ganjam 0 0 0 0 25(100) 0 25(100)

Remarks: It is observed as well as reported by the teachers of the sample schools having CWSN students that the peers’ interaction with CWSN students in the class room as well as in the school compound is very cordial and friendly.

Table-5.5.10

Individualized Educational Plan (IEPs) prepared for CWSN No. of Schools prepared IEP for CWSN

Total District Prepared % Not Prepared %

Ganjam 0 0 25 100 25 (100%)

Remarks: None of the sample schools out of 25 has reported about preparation of individualized educational plan to improve the learning achievement level of CWSN category students.

Table-5.5.11

Availability of adequate facilities for seating CWSN No. of Schools with CWSN seating facilities


Ganjam 1 4 24 96 25 (100%)

Remarks: Out of 25 schools in the sample, only one school (4%) has reported adequate facilities for seating of CWSN students in the classroom.

Table-5.5.12

Extent and nature of use of ITC devices for teaching and learning of the CWSN No of schools having facilities of ICT devices

District

LCD Projector Overhead Projector

Computer & Accessories with net connection

NA Total with %

Ganjam 0 0 0 25(100) 25(100)

Remarks: None of the sample schools of the district has ICT devices for teaching and learning of CWSN students.

30

Teachers’ Training

Table-5.5.13

Provisions for Training of Teachers S.

No.

Provisions for in-service training Schedule Duration

1 Induction training (Science, Math’s, English, `Social Science, Hindi & Sanskrit)

For newly recruited teachers

10 days training programme based on NCF. 2005, content, pedagogy and classroom activities.

2 In-service training –need based 5 days’ training programme in workshop mode in Math’s, English, Social Science and Science

From July to December (50% of existing teachers from each district to be covered)

5 days

3 Orientation programme for Head Master/ Principal

As per SPO calendar 3 days

4 Training for newly recruited Head Masters


5 Management training for Head Masters/ Principals

From Aug. to January 14 days

6 Workshop for Development of different modules for training


7 Training of Resource Persons for H.M.’s training

As per SPO calendar

8 Block head-quarters and girls hostels

As per SPO calendar 2 hrs. daily after School for 15 days

9 Development and Life skills for girls


10 Sensitization programme (legal literacy workshop)


Remarks: It is reported by the Head Masters of all the sample schools that in-service training is regularly being organized for the teachers and also for the Head Masters to improve their teaching-learning capability, classroom delivery of lessons and retention as well as capacity building of weak students. The Head Masters are also imparted training on school management and sensitization of parents and elders to increase enrolment level of students at the secondary level.

Table-5.5.14

Physical availability of adequate and good quality facilities for in-service training with

reference to Facilities Ganjam

Adequate % Inadequate %

Space 1 4 24 96

Projection 1 4 24 96

Tools/Modules 1 4 24 96

Equipment’s (LCD, Projector, Computer etc.) 1 4 24 96

Remarks: Only one of the sample schools has reported that the facilities available for in-service training of teachers with reference to various requirements such as space and projection, tools/modules and equipments like computer, LCD projector, etc. are adequate at the training centres set up at the district level.

31

Table-5.5.15

Whether training modules are need based or not

Training modules are need based


Ganjam 25(100) 0 25(100)

Remarks: All the sample schools have reported that the training modules are need-based.

Table-5.5.16

Use of new technologies like Computer Assisted Learning CAL, LCD, Projector etc. for

imparting lessons in the classroom by teachers District Total No. of teachers

received training No. of teachers using CAL, LCD etc in teaching

No Total with %

Ganjam 0 0 25(100) 25(100)

Remarks: Although teachers are imparted training at the district and state level by using modern technologies like computer, LCD projector, etc., none of the sample schools has such facility for classroom teaching of students by using CAL method, LCD projector, etc.

Table-5.5.17

Trainers/Resource persons from following institutions who imparted training No. of Resource person received training

District Secondary School

Higher Secondary School

DIET College/ University

SIERT IASE CTE NIC Any other institution

Total with %

Ganjam 25(100) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25(100)

Remarks: There is no information relating to trainers/resource persons of the institutions those who imparted training to the teachers of the sample schools during last academic session 2012-13.

32

6. CIVIL WORKS

General Information at School Level

Table-6.1

School Name & Year of Establishment

(Ganjam)

Name_of_school Estd.

Year of Construction

(RMSA funded) Remarks

Baulagam High School 1962 NA NA

Govt High School, Berhampur 1973 2015 New Building

S L N M High School, Courtpeta 1966 NA NA

Rambha High School, Rambha 1956 NA NA

P T High School, Palur 1979 NA NA

Sundareswar High School 1966 NA NA

R C M High School, Kanheipur 1963 NA NA

Govt UG High School, Khojapalli 1993 NA NA

Badakusasthali High School 1983 NA NA

Rambha Girls High School 1983 NA NA

R T Vidyapitha, PratapPur 1963 NA NA

Chamakhandi High School 1977 NA NA

S N Bidyapitha, Tanganapalli 1961 NA NA

V VGiri Secondary Training School for Women 1856 NA NA

BrundabanBidyapitha 1941 NA NA

Govt Girls High School, Aska 1958 NA NA

Bhagabati Bidyapitha 1963 2015 Additional Cl. Room

Hari Hara High School 1917 NA NA

Govt High School, Kanchuapada 1951 NA NA

Utkal Bidyapitha High School 1981 2014 Additional Cl. Room

Govt UG High School, Purunapatana 2011 NA NA

Bhairabi High School 1981 2013-14 NA

M M High School, Girisola 1972 NA NA

Ghatipari High School 1964 2014-15 Additional Cl. Room

MukteswarBidyapitha, Surla 1980 NA NA

Remarks: It is found that in four schools out of 25 in the sample, civil works for construction of additional classrooms, construction of new school buildings are in progress during 2013-14 and 2015-16. In three schools construction activities are reported for new additional classrooms to ensure better space in classrooms with RMSA grants, while in the other school of the sample construction of new building was started during 2014-15 and it is now under progress. The construction works are observed to be somewhat satisfactory and the school authority/SMDC feels helpless in monitoring the construction work, as it is taken by the Rural Works Department of Government of Odisha. The contractors executing the construction work in the school premise do not pay any importance to the suggestions given by the teachers or SMDC members.

Table-6.2

Availability of classrooms for Class IX & X (Std. Size 20’x24’)

District Class Sections Available no. of rooms % Deficit %

Ganjam IX 36 36 100 -

X 39 39 100 -

Remarks: There is as such no shortage of classrooms in all the surveyed sample schools of the district. However, it was observed that in some schools students are compelled to sit in a very congested environment, as there are no additional classrooms as well as additional teachers to increase the number of sections for Class IX and X in those schools.

33

Table-6.3

Area of the school School Campus

No of schools having School Building Open Space Play Ground Other (pond and orchard)

25 25 16 18

% 100.00 100.00 64.00 72.00

Total area (sq. ft.) of sampled schools.

310290 1528233 978154 1501343

Average area per school (sq. ft.)

12928.75 63676.38 61134.63 83407.94

Remarks: It is found that all the 25 sample schools have their own school building and these schools have their open space. However, only 16 (64%) schools have their own playground for students and 18(72%) schools have land for other amenities such as pond, orchard, etc. The average area of school building, open space, playground and space for other land use such as pond, orchard, farm fields, etc in the case of 18 schools of the district is observed to be satisfactory.

II. Design

Table-6.4

Type of building

District Pucca Semi Pucca

Pucca& Semi Pucca

Kutcha Rented Total with %

Ganjam 17(68) 0 7(28) 1(4) 0 25(100)

Remarks: Out of the total 25 sample schools of the district, 17 (68%) schools are found to be having pucca buildings, one (4%) is kutcha and the rest seven (28%) schools are having both pucca and semi-pucca structures. None of the schools runs in rented building. However, the classrooms of some of the schools are found to be in weak condition. There is crack, leakage, seepage and damage in plaster of the roofs and walls and all such classrooms require renovation for the safety of students.

Table-6.5

Physical condition of building District Crack Damp Seepages Damages in

plaster Total with %

Ganjam 12 (48)

1 (4)

9 (36)

3 (12)

25 (100)

Remarks: It is found from physical verifications of all the sample schools of the district by the monitoring team that about 48 per cent of the schools have cracked roofs and walls, nine (36%) schools have seepage problem and three (12%) of the schools have damages in plaster and also damaged flooring. Needless to say, some of the school buildings have multiple physical problems such as crack roofs/walls, seepage of roofs and walls and damaged plaster of the walls and floors.

Table-6.6

Any local innovative approaches in school building design

District Yes % No % Total with %

Ganjam 0 0 25 100 25(100)

Kind of Innovation NA

Remarks: As such there is little local innovation in school building design. It is observed by the monitoring team that none of the schools has applied any innovative building design to make school building beautiful, attractive and impressive for the visitors.

34

Table-6.7

Availability of natural light and cross ventilation; if not, reason thereof, and the steps

taken by school authorities to rectify it.

Natural Light & Cross ventilation If no, Reason

Steps taken to rectifies District Yes No Total with %

Ganjam 22(88) 3(12) 25(100) NA No step taken

Remarks: Only twenty two (88%) of the school buildings and their classrooms are found to be well lighted and cross ventilated for the comforts of teachers and students. In the rest three schools of the sample no step has been for rectification of the problem.

Table-6.8(a)

Lighting facility in classroom

Arrangement of lighting facility

Functional or not functional

If not functioned, Reasons

Steps taken


Yes No Total with %

Ganjam 23 (92)

2 (8)

25 (100)

23 (92)

2 (8)

25 (100)

Electrification is not available

NA

Remarks: Twenty three (92%) of the sample schools of the district have been provided with electricity connection and it is in functional condition. However, two of the sample schools do not have electricity connection. More so, there is problem of power cuts as well as intermittent supply problem of electricity in rural areas and this sometimes affects functioning of schools.

Table-6.8(b)

Lighting facility in Classroom

Supply of electricity

If Intermittent avg. duration of availability District Continuous Intermittent Total with %

Ganjam 2(8) 23(92) 25(100) 20-22 hours a day

Remarks: It is reported that two (8%) of the sample schools have regular supply problem of electricity as there is no electricity connection and in the other 23 schools of the district there is intermittent power supply problems thereby affecting the smooth functioning of schools during school hours.

Table-6.9

Availability & usability of following provision of alternative electric power supply Availability TotalSchool

with % District Generator (ICT)

Inverter Gobar Gas Plant

Solar Panels

Wind Electricity

No

Ganjam 1(4) 0 0 0 0 24(96) 25(100)

Remarks: It is found by the monitoring team that only one school (4%) of the sample has generator to make alternative electric power supply in case of power failure.

35

Table-6.10

Library design and availability of the followings: Sufficient Seating Space, Proper

Light &Ventilation Regular Pest Control

District Yes No Total with % Yes No Total with %

Ganjam 2 (8)

23 (92)

25 (100)

2 (8)

23 (92)

25 (100)

Remarks: It is observed that Library in majority of the sample schools is found existent for namesake only. There is hardly any useful collection of books for students, very little space for reading room and the like. It may be seen from Table 6.10 that only in two schools the library is in good functional condition. There is regular pest control measure, sufficient seating space; proper light and ventilation system in these two libraries. .

Table-6.11

Laboratory design Adequate space for

physics, chem, biology etc

Proper height of lab table

Cross ventilation & Exhaust Fan

Availability of Running Water


Yes No Total with %

Yes No Total with %

Yes No Total with %

Ganjam 1 (4)

24 (96)

25 (100)

1 (4)

24 (96)

25 (100)

1 (4)

24 (96)

25 (100)

1 (4)

24 (96)

25 (100)

Remarks: Only one (4%) of the sample schools has a well-equipped laboratory with adequate space for physics, chemistry, biology labs, etc. In other schools of the sample there is no separate room for laboratory and the scientific instruments are just stored in a room for showpiece purpose.

Facilities for Physically Challenged Table-6.12

Availability of ramps to access the following Facility for physically challenged Drinking water, toilet, sci lab, math

lab, library, playground


Ganjam 6(24) 19(76) 25(100) 4(Toilet) 21(84) 25(100)

Remarks: It is observed that only six (24%) of the sample schools have ramp facilities for physically challenged students. However, in some of those schools the ramps are not designed scientifically to make them accessible for physically challenged students. Similarly, only in four (16%) schools there is separate toilet for physically challenged students. But, there is no special provision for access to drinking water, science lab and playground for physically challenged students.

Table-6.13

Availability of benches of different height in classrooms

Bench Availability


Ganjam 2 8 23 92 25(100)

Remarks: Only in two (8%) schools there is availability of benches of different heights for the sitting of students in the classrooms, while in other 23 (92%) of the sample schools such facility is not available.

36

Table-6.14

Ramp’s condition

No. of Schools with ramps & hand rails


Ganjam 6 24 19 76 25(100)

Remarks: Out of 25 schools in the sample six (24%) have ramps with handrails for the use of physically challenged students.

Table-6.15

Source of drinking water Source of drinking water Availability of sufficient

water

District Supply Water

Tube Well

Dug Well

Other

Total with %

Yes No %

Ganjam 9(36) 12(48) 1(4) 3(12) 25(100) 18(72) 7(28) 25(100)

Remarks: Out of 25 sample schools 18 (72%) have reported availability sufficient drinking water within the school premise. More so, out of total 25 schools, nine (36%) have provision for piped water supply, 12 (48%) secure water from the tube well and one school (4%) has a dug well, whereas the rest three schools (12%) depend on other sources for supply of drinking water.

Table-6.16

Water storage facility, its condition & cleaning schedule Type of facility Cleaning Schedule

District Open

Tank

Covered

Tank

Undergro

und Tank

Overhea

d Tank

Not

Available

Total

with %

Week

ly

Fortni

ghtly

Mo

nthly

6

monthly

Not

Defined

Total

with %

Ganjam 0 1 (4)

0 20 (80)

4 (16)

25 (100)

14 (56)

0 4 (16)

2 (8)

5 (20)

25 (100)

Remarks: Twenty-one schools (84%) out of 25 schools in the sample have provision for water storage facility- 20 (80%) schools through overhead tank and one school has covered tank. However, while in 14 (56%) schools the overhead tanks are cleaned in every week, in four (16%) those are cleaned on monthly basis and in the rest schools the tanks are cleaned twice in a year.

Table-6.17

Quality of drinking water

Quality

District Satisfactory % Not Satisfactory % Total with %

Ganjam 16 64 9 36 25(100)

Remarks: The quality of drinking water in 16 (64%) of the sample schools is reported to be satisfactory.

Table-6.18

Measures taken by school authority to ensure clean drinking water

Measures

District Aqua guard R/o Water Filter

Others None Total with %

Ganjam 1(4) 0 0 19(76) 5(20) 25(100)

Remarks: It is reported that 20 (80%) of the sample schools of the district have taken measures like installation of aqua guard (4%) and mud pot water filter system (76%) for purifying water to ensure clean drinking water for students and staffs. However, the rest five (20%) schools of the sample do not have any water purifying measure to ensure the supply of clean drinking water to the students and staffs.

37

Table-6.19

Measures adopted for treatment & testing of water Measures for treatment Testing of water done

District Bleaching Powder

Chlorine Alum Powder

None Total with %

Yes No Total with %

Ganjam 20 (80)

0 0 5 (20)

25 (100)

16 (64)

9 (36)

25 (100)

Remarks: For treatment of drinking water bleaching powder is used at regular intervals by 20 (80%) of the sample schools, while five schools do not adopt any measures for water treatment. Similarly, testing of water has been done by 16 (64%) of the sample schools, whereas nine (36%) of them have not tested the water consumed by them.

Table-6.20

Availability of sufficient numbers of drinking water taps Availability of water taps


Ganjam 11 44 14 56 25(100)

Remarks: Out of 25 schools in the sample, 11 (44%) have sufficient number of water taps to access drinking water by the students.

Sanitation Facility

Table-6.21

Availability of adequate numbers of urinals/lavatories for students, teachers & others Facility of urinals/lavatories in school


Ganjam 11 44 14 56 25(100)

Remarks: Out of 25 schools in the sample, 11 (44%) have adequate number of urinals/lavatories for students, teachers and others. That means majority of the schools (56%) do not have adequate washrooms for students, teachers and others. In the present situation of pursuing Swacchha Bharat Abhiyan mission, or clean India dream, the goal will not be realised if the institutions where the future citizens are made to take forward the Nation are not provided with adequate number of lavatories.

Table-6.22

Maintenance/cleanliness of toilets & supply of water

Maintenance/Cleanliness of toilets & supply of water


Ganjam 23 92 2 8 25(100)

Remarks: Although 23 (92%) of sample schools have toilets for the use of students, teachers and staffs, out of them only in two (8%) schools the toilets have provision of running water supply and cleanliness is properly maintained.

Table-6.23

Availability of separate toilets for girls Separate Toilet

availability Safer location of Girls toilet

Availability of Napkins & Dustbins


Yes No Total with %

Yes No Total with %

Ganjam 17 (68)

8 (32)

25 (100)

17 (68)

8 (32)

25 (100)

0 25 (100)

25 (100)

38

Remarks: It is found that only in 17 (68%) schools there is provision of separate toilets for girl students and all of these toilets are located in safer places. However, in none of the schools there is provision for napkins and dustbins for the use of girl students.

Table-6.24

Provision of toilets for physically challenged students

Availability of Provision


Ganjam 4 16 21 84 25(100)

Remarks: Only in four (16%) schools, out of 25 sample schools, there is provision of separate toilets for physically challenged students.

Table-6.25

Lavatories single pits/double pits attached with septic tank & cleaning of septic tank Connectivity of lavatories with

single pit/double pit with septic tank

Regular cleaning of septic tank


Ganjam 25(100) 0 25(100) 14(56) 11(44) 25(100)

Remarks: In all sample schools there is connectivity of lavatories with single/double pit with septic tank. However, the septic tanks of only 14 (56%) schools are regularly being cleaned due to paucity of fund.

Drainage System Table-6.26(a)

Availability of drainage facility

Drainage System Available


Ganjam 3 12 22 88 25(100)

Remarks: Only three (12%) of the sample schools has drainage facility.

Table-6.26(b)

Type of drains District Under

Ground Pucca Covered

Pucca& Open

Kutcha & Open No Total with %

Ganjam 0 0 1(4) 2(8) 22(88) 25(100)

Remarks: Only three of the sample schools have drainage facilities. Out of that one school has pucca and open drain and the other two schools have kutcha and open drain.

Table-6.26(c)

Structural condition of drain Structural Condition of Drain Regular Cleaning of drains

done in school

District Good Bad Damaged No Total with % Yes No Total with %

Ganjam 1 (4)

0 0

24 (96)

25 (100)

1 (4)

24 (96)

25 (100)

Remarks: Out of three of the sample schools having drainage facilities, the structural condition of the drain in only one of the school is found to be satisfactory and it is regularly cleaned.

39

Table-6.26(d)

Any instance of water logging


Ganjam 10 40 15 60 25(100)

Remarks: Ten of the sample schools have reported water logging problems as there is no drainage facility.

Table-6.27(a)

Waste water treatment/discharge Waste Water treatment &

Discharge Arrangement If yes, Type of drainage system


Septic Tank

Municipal Drain

Open Field

Ganjam 14(56) 11(44) 25(100) 13 0 1

Remarks: Fourteen (56%) of the sample schools have arrangement for treatment and discharge of waste water. Out of fourteen schools, thirteen have provision to channelize the waste water to septic tank, and one school uses open field for drainage.

Table-6.27(b)

Availability of solid waste collection and disposal facility Availability of waste collection

facility If yes, adequate & condition of dustbin


Ganjam 21(84) 4(16) 25(100) 21(84) 4(16) 25(100)

Remarks: In twenty-one (84%) schools there is provision for collection and disposal of solid waste and all these schools have adequate number of dustbins/garbage bins to dispose of the solid waste. However, it was found by the monitoring team that most of the schools were using paper cartoons/baskets as dustbins for collection and disposal of solid waste materials.

Table-6.27 (c)

Availability of facility for treatment of waste & composting of organic waste


Ganjam 1 4 24 96 25(100)

Remarks: Only one of these schools has facility for treatment of waste and composting it into organic waste.

Table-6.28(a)

Water &energy conservation

Availability of Water Conservation Measures


Ganjam 0 0 25 100 25(100)

Remarks: None of the sample schools in the district has made provision for water conservation measures.

Table-6.28(b)

Availability of rain water harvesting system


Ganjam 0 0 25 100 25(100)

Remarks: None of the sample schools is having any water harvesting system.

40

Table-6.28 (c)

Condition of rain water harvesting system

District Working % Not Working % Total with %

Ganjam 0 0 25 100 25(100)

Remarks: There is no water harvesting system in any of the sample schools, so rain water harvesting

condition does not arise.

Table-6.28(d)

Availability of lighting facility


Ganjam 23 92 2 8 25(100)

Remarks: Lighting facility is available in 23 (92%) of the sample schools.

Table-6.28(e)

Teachers/school management awareness about use of renewable sources of energy


Ganjam 0 0 25 100 25(100)

Remarks: Not a single teachers and school management authorities is aware about use of renewable sources of energy.

Table-6.28(f)

Source of energy District Type of source

Gobar Gas Plant

Solar Energy

Wind Energy

No Total with %

Ganjam 0 0 0 25(100) 25(100)

Remarks: None of the sample school has made any provision to tap renewable energy such as gobar gas, solar energy or wind energy.

Table-6.28(g)

Safety aspect of building design

Condition of Building

District Good % Bad % Total with %

Ganjam 18 72 7 28 25(100)

Remarks: The condition of school buildings from their overall safety aspect is found to be good in the case of 18 (72%) of the sample schools.

Table-6.28(h)

No. of schools with special structural facility to cope with natural hazards

District Flood Cyclone Earthquake Flood & Cyclone

No Total with %

Ganjam 0 17(68) 0 0 8(32) 25(100)

Remarks: Only seventeen (68%) of the sample schools have structural facility to cope with the problem of natural hazards like cyclone resistant structures. However, none of the schools is designed to cope up with the problems of flood, both flood and cyclone together and also to contain earthquake. Eight (32%) of the sample schools have no such structural design to cope up with the outcome of any natural calamities.

41

Table-6.28(i)

The Width of the staircases is sufficient or not

District Sufficient % Not Sufficient % Total with %

Ganjam 15 60 10 40 25(100)

Remarks: Out of 25 schools in the sample fifteen schools (60%) are found to be having adequate width of the staircases for safe evacuation of students and teachers in case of any emergency.

Table-6.28(j)

Availability of disaster preparedness plan Disaster preparedness

& Emergency Evacuation plan

Awareness about disaster & received training to handle

Fire extinguishers available

Trained to handle fire extinguishers

Availability of contact no. of ambulance, hospital & fire brigade

District Yes No Total with

%

Yes No Total with

%

Yes No Total with

%

Yes No Total with

%

Yes No Total with

%

Ganjam 8 (32)

17 (68)

25 (100)

7 (28)

18 (72)

25 (100)

20 (80)

5 (20)

25 (100)

6 (24)

19 (76)

25 (100)

12 (48)

13 (52)

25 (100)

Remarks: Majority of the sample schools in the district lacks disaster preparedness plan and only eight of the schools have disaster preparedness & emergency evacuation plan. Though twenty schools have installed fire extinguishers, only six of those schools do have trained personnel to handle the fire extinguisher. Similarly, only 12 of the sample schools have made easy access to information about contact telephone numbers of ambulance, hospital and fire brigade.

Table-6.28(k)

Schools with ongoing construction activity Ongoing construction

activities Type of construction


New school

building

Strengthening of existing school/

Repair work

No Total with %

Ganjam 4 (16)

21 (84)

25 (100)

1 (4)

3 (Additional class Rooms)

(12)

21 (84)

25 (100)

Remarks: In four (16%) of the sample schools construction activities are found to be going on- one school is constructing its new building, while the other three schools are constructing additional class rooms to meet the deficit of class rooms in the existing buildings.

Table-6.28(l)

Measures taken by school authorities for construction related disturbances Academic activities

hampered due to construction

Construction activity vitiate quality of water,air,land& noise pollution in permissible limit

Construction material stored appropriately

Temporary fencing of construction area done


Yes No Total with %

Yes No Total with %

Yes No NA Total with %

Ganjam 4 (16)

21 (84)

25 (100)

4 (16)

21 (84)

25 (100)

4 (16)

21 (84)

25 (100)

0 4 (16)

21 (84)

25 (100)

Remarks: None of the sample schools out of 4 schools reporting construction work has made temporary fencing of construction area to prevent disturbances caused to students and teachers due to

42

polluted ambience of the school premise. However, all the four schools have reported that academic activities in the schools are affected due to construction activities and such activities during school hours vitiate the quality of water, air, land and cause noise pollution.

Table-6.28(m)

Work progress of construction Contractor whom the

work awarded

Stage of construction work Construction work being

according to lay out plan

District

Yes

No Total with

%

Foundation

level

Plinth

level

Lintel

Roof

level

Flooring

Finishing Level

No Total with

%

Yes No Total with %

Ganjam

0 25 (100)

25 (100)

0 0 0 0 0 0 25 (100)

25 (100)

0 25 (100)

25 (100)

Remarks: As none of the schools takes up construction work, they have not provided any information relating to progress of the construction work taken up in their school.

7. SCHOOL ANNUAL GRANT

Table-7.1

Month of receiving school annual grant for the financial year 2014-15 in sampled

schools

District Month of receipt of SAG Number of Schools %

Ganjam 15.12.2014 25 100.00

Remarks: It is found that all other 25 of the sample schools have received their annual grant in the month of December, 2014.

Table-7.2

Status of utilization of funds with % and expenditure done as per norms of the scheme Sl.

No. Name of the School

Sanctione

d amount

Month of

receipt

Expendi

ture till date

% of

expenditure

1 Baulagam High School 50000 15.12.2014 50000 100

2 Govt High School, Berhampur 50000 15.12.2014 50000 100

3 S L N M High School, Courtpeta 50000 15.12.2014 50000 100

4 Rambha High School, Rambha 50000 15.12.2014 50000 100

5 P T High School, Palur 50000 15.12.2014 50000 100

6 Sundareswar High School 50000 15.12.2014 50000 100

7 R C M High School, Kanheipur 50000 15.12.2014 50000 100

8 Govt UG High School, Khojapalli 50000 15.12.2014 50000 100

9 Badakusasthali High School 50000 15.12.2014 50000 100

10 Rambha Girls High School 50000 15.12.2014 50000 100

11 R T Vidyapitha, PratapPur 50000 15.12.2014 50000 100

12 Chamakhandi High School 50000 15.12.2014 50000 100

13 S N Bidyapitha, Tanganapalli 50000 15.12.2014 50000 100

14 V VGiri Secondary Training School for Women 50000 15.12.2014 50000 100

15 BrundabanBidyapitha 50000 15.12.2014 50000 100

16 Govt Girls High School, Aska 50000 15.12.2014 50000 100

17 BhagabatiBidyapitha 50000 15.12.2014 50000 100

18 Hari Hara High School 50000 15.12.2014 50000 100

19 Govt High School, Kanchuapada 50000 15.12.2014 50000 100

20 UtkalBidyapitha High School 50000 15.12.2014 50000 100

21 Govt UG High School, Purunapatana 50000 15.12.2014 50000 100

22 Bhairabi High School 50000 15.12.2014 50000 100

23 M M High School, Girisola 50000 15.12.2014 50000 100

24 Ghatipari High School 50000 15.12.2014 50000 100

25 MukteswarBidyapitha, Surla 50000 15.12.2014 50000 100

Remarks: It is found that all the sample schools of the district have made full utilization of their annual RMSA grant.

43

Table-7.3

Status of utilization of school annual grant Details/No. of Schools

Which were sanctioned SAGs Which were sanctioned but did not receive SAGs

Which received but did not spend?

25 Nil NA

Remarks: It is found that all the sample schools of the district have made full utilization of their annual RMSA grant.

Table-7.4

Utilization of SAG as per norms SAG funds utilized on works

Number of Schools

%

Funds utilized as per norms in number of Schools

If not utilized as per norms, give reasons

Yes % No %

1.White wash 25 100 25 100 0 0 N.A.

2.Wall painting 25 100 25 100 0 0 N.A.

3.Local innovation 25 100 25 100 0 0 N.A.

4.Sanitary work 25 100 25 100 0 0 N.A.

Remarks: All the 25 schools have utilised their SAG as per norm.

Minor Repair Grant

Table-7.5

Receipt of minor repair grant – (For Financial Year 2013-14) S.

N.

Name of the School Sanctione

d amount

Month of

receipt

Expenditur

e till date

% of

expenditure











11 R T Vidyapitha, PratapPur 25000 26.03.2014 25000 100



14 V VGiri Secondary Training School for Women 25000 26.03.2014 25000 100

15 BrundabanBidyapitha 25000 26.03.2014 25000 100


17 BhagabatiBidyapitha 25000 26.03.2014 25000 100



20 UtkalBidyapitha High School 25000 26.03.2014 25000 100





25 MukteswarBidyapitha, Surla 25000 26.03.2014 25000 100

Remarks: All 25 sample schools have received their MRG for the year 2013-14, at the end of financial year in the month of March, 2014.

44

Table-7.6

Utilization of minor repair grant on repair and white-wash of the school building

District Total no of schools who received minor repair grant

Number of Schools utilized the grant on repair and white wash

Number of schools who did not utilize fund as per norms

Utilization (in %)

Ganjam 25 25 NA 100.00

Remarks: All the 25 schools have received MRG and have spent the minor repair grant on repair and white wash of the school building.

Table-7.7

Utilization of minor repair grant as per norms

Minor Repair Grant utilized on works

Number of Schools

%

Funds utilized as per norms


Yes % No %

1.Furniture & Fixture

25 100 25 100 0 0 1.NA

2.Repairing 25 100 25 100 0 0 2. NA

3. Plastering 25 100 25 100 0 0 3. NA

Remarks: There is full utilization of the minor repair grant as per the norms.

45

DEO LEVEL INFORMATION ON RMSA

2. Name of District- Ganjam

Table-1

Sl

No

General Information

Ganjam

Yes/No

1 Whether Master list of all schools has been prepared Yes

2 Whether Data Capture Formats (DCF) have been distributed to all schools

Yes

3 Whether any kind of training to fill up Data Capture Formats (DCF ) has been provided to Teachers/Head teacher

Yes

4 Whether data have been received from all the schools in DCF for the current year

Yes

5 Whether the schools have a copy of the filled in DCF for record & reference

Yes

6 Whether the school report card is generated & distributed to all schools after data entry

Yes

7 Whether sample check has been done after receiving of filled in DCF from schools

Yes

If yes, (Findings are) Enrolment status of the schools, Toilets, Boundary wall, Play ground, Electrification, ICT lab, Library, Art

& craft room.

8 Whether data have been submitted to the state as per the time schedule

Yes

9 Whether level of data is being analyzed and disseminated

Yes

10 Whether the school authority is aware of the importance of data collected under MIS & reusing the data

Yes

11 Whether SEMIS/UDISE data are used for planning & budgeting

Yes

12 Whether backup of the data supplied under SEMIS/UDISE is properly maintained

Yes

46

Table-2

Status of Un-served Habitation under School Mapping (Ganjam) Sl

No. Name of Block Method of

School Mapping Exercise

(GIP) Mapping/Manual

Mapping

Whether Distance Matrix

Exercise has been

conducted (Yes/No)

No. of Habitation

No. of Habitations covered by

Sec. School in 5 Km areas

No. of Habitations

without Sec.

School in 5 Km radius

No. of un-served

Habitations eligible for sec. school as per State

Norms

No. of un-served

Habitations not eligible

for sec. school as per State Norms

1 ASKA Manual Mapping YES 186 186 Nil Nil Nil

2 BEGUNIAPADA Manual Mapping YES 176 176 Nil Nil Nil

3 BELLAGUNTHA Manual Mapping YES 148 148 Nil Nil Nil

4 BHANJANAGAR Manual Mapping YES 274 274 Nil Nil Nil

5 BUGUDA Manual Mapping YES 141 141 Nil Nil Nil

6 CHATRAPUR Manual Mapping YES 147 147 Nil Nil Nil

7 CHIKITI Manual Mapping YES 141 141 Nil Nil Nil

8 DHARAKOTE Manual Mapping YES 184 184 Nil Nil Nil

9 DIGAPAHANDI Manual Mapping YES 284 284 Nil Nil Nil

10 GANJAM Manual Mapping YES 120 120 Nil Nil Nil

11 HINJILICUT Manual Mapping YES 182 182 Nil Nil Nil

12 JAGANATHPRASAD Manual Mapping YES 281 281 Nil Nil Nil

13 KABISURYANAGAR Manual Mapping YES 93 93 Nil Nil Nil

14 KHALLIKOTE Manual Mapping YES 305 305 Nil Nil Nil

15 KUKUDAKHANDI Manual Mapping YES 239 239 Nil Nil Nil

16 PATRAPUR Manual Mapping YES 362 362 Nil Nil Nil

17 POLASARA Manual Mapping YES 136 136 Nil Nil Nil

18 PURUSOTAMPUR Manual Mapping YES 142 142 Nil Nil Nil

19 RANGEILUNDA Manual Mapping YES 278 278 Nil Nil Nil

20 SANAKHEMUNDI Manual Mapping YES 242 242 Nil Nil Nil

21 SHERAGADA Manual Mapping YES 108 108 Nil Nil Nil

22 SURADA Manual Mapping YES 443 443 Nil Nil Nil

23 ASKA NAC Manual Mapping YES 17 17 Nil Nil Nil

24 BELLAGUNTHA NAC Manual Mapping YES 13 13 Nil Nil Nil

25 BERHAMPUR MC Manual Mapping YES 40 40 Nil Nil Nil

26 BHANJANAGAR NAC Manual Mapping YES 15 15 Nil Nil Nil

27 BUGUDA NAC Manual Mapping YES 13 13 Nil Nil Nil

28 CHATRAPUR NAC Manual Mapping YES 14 14 Nil Nil Nil

29 CHIKITI NAC Manual Mapping YES 12 12 Nil Nil Nil

30 DIGAPAHANDI NAC Manual Mapping YES 11 11 Nil Nil Nil

31 GANJAM NAC Manual Mapping YES 12 12 Nil Nil Nil

32 GOPALAPUR NAC Manual Mapping YES 11 11 Nil Nil Nil

33 HINJILICUT NAC Manual Mapping YES 22 22 Nil Nil Nil

34 KABISURYANAGAR NAC Manual Mapping YES 18 18 Nil Nil Nil

35 KHALLIKOTE NAC Manual Mapping YES 12 12 Nil Nil Nil

36 KODALA NAC Manual Mapping YES 13 13 Nil Nil Nil

37 POLASARA NAC Manual Mapping YES 19 19 Nil Nil Nil

38 PURUSOTAMPUR NAC Manual Mapping YES 14 14 Nil Nil Nil

39 RAMBHA NAC Manual Mapping YES 13 13 Nil Nil Nil

40 SURADA NAC Manual Mapping YES 11 11 Nil Nil Nil

TOTAL YES 4892 4892 Nil Nil

Remarks: There are 4892 habitation under the twenty two community development blocks including 16 NACs and one Municipal Corporation in Ganjam District. Out of 4892 habitations all habitations are having secondary schools within their 5 km radius.

Table-3

No. of New Schools Sanctioned under RMSA (Ganjam)

District 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15

Ganjam 35 17 0 2 0 0

Remarks: Number of new schools sanctioned under RMSA during 2009-10 was 35, 17 in 2010-11 and only two schools in the year 2012-13.

47

Table-4

Progress (No. of Schools Functioning) (Ganjam)

District Against 2009-10

Against 2010-11

Against 2011-12

Against 2012-13

Against 2013-14

Against 2014-15

Ganjam 35 17 0 2 0 0

Remarks: Number of new schools functioning during 2009-10, 2010-11 and 2012-13 were 35, 17 and 2 respectively..

Table-5

Enrolment in Functional Schools under RMSA

District 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15

Ganjam 1564 1158 2239 3057 0 0

Remarks: According to the information provided by the DEO office, information regarding the enrolment of students in 54 upgraded high schools during 2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12 and 2012-13 were 1564, 1158, 2239 and 3057.

Table-6

School Particulars

District No. of School with Class I to

X

No. of Schools with Class I to

XII

No. of Schools with Class

V/VI to X

No. of Schools with Class VI

to XII


VII/VIII to X


VII/VIII to XII


VIII/IX to X


VIII/IX to XII

No. of Schools with Class XI

to XII

Ganjam 140 12 88 0 346 0 62 0 0

% 21.60 1.85 13.58 0 53.40 0 9.57 0 0

Remarks: Out of 648 secondary schools in the district, 346 (53.40%) schools are found to be having Classes from VII/VIII to X, 140 (21.60%) schools from Class I to X, 88 (13.58%) schools from Class V/VI to X, 62 (9.57%) schools from Class VIII/IX to X and 12 (1.85%) schools from Class I to XII.

Table-7

Schools already supported under RMSA

District No. of Govt. Secondary Schools as on 2008-09

Schools with 2 section & above

Schools with 1 section

Schools supported for strengthening under RMSA

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13

Ganjam 251 156 95 35 17 0 2

Remarks: Out of 251 RMSA funded schools in 2008-09, schools with single section were 95 (37.85%) and 156 (62.15%) schools were having two or more sections. Schools supported for strengthening under RMSA were 35 in 2009-10, 17 in 2010-11 and 2 in 2012-13.

48

Table-8

Number of Schools having classes IX-X by funding under RMSA (Ganjam)

Sl No.

SEMIS Block Code

Block

Total No. of Sec. Schools

State Govt Sec. Schools

Local Body Sec. Schools

Central

Govt Sec. Schools or PSUs (KVS/NVS etc)

Pvt. Aided

(Contributes to the major share of the school’s budget)

Pvt. Unaided

1 211901 ASKA 30 12 0 0 16 2

2 211902 BEGUNIAPADA 23 9 0 0 13 1

3 211903 BELLAGUNTHA 21 15 0 0 6 0

4 211904 BHANJANAGAR 23 12 0 0 6 5

5 211905 BUGUDA 23 14 0 0 8 1

6 211906 CHATRAPUR 21 12 0 1 7 1

7 211907 CHIKITI 18 14 0 0 4 0

8 211908 DHARAKOTE 19 11 0 0 3 5

9 211909 DIGAPAHANDI 33 19 0 0 11 3

10 211910 GANJAM 16 7 0 0 7 2

11 211911 HINJILICUT 23 12 0 0 11 0

12 211912 JAGANATHPRASAD 30 16 0 0 12 2

13 211913 KABISURYANAGAR 22 14 0 0 5 3

14 211914 KHALLIKOTE 28 17 0 0 8 3

15 211915 KUKUDAKHANDI 25 13 0 0 8 4

16 211916 PATRAPUR 28 14 0 1 11 2

17 211917 POLASARA 26 15 0 0 10 1

18 211918 PURUSOTAMPUR 28 15 0 0 12 1

19 211919 RANGEILUNDA 29 15 0 0 11 3

20 211920 SANAKHEMUNDI 23 13 0 0 10 0

21 211921 SHERAGADA 25 19 0 0 6 0

22 211922 SURADA 26 18 0 0 6 2

23 211923 ASKA NAC 7 3 0 0 1 3

24 211924 BELLAGUNTHA NAC 2 1 0 0 1 0

25 211925 BERHAMPUR MPL 46 15 0 1 7 23

26 211926 BHANJANAGAR NAC 4 4 0 0 0 0

27 211927 BUGUDA NAC 3 3 0 0 0 0

28 211928 CHATRAPUR NAC 6 2 0 0 1 3

29 211929 CHIKITI NAC 3 3 0 0 0 0

30 211930 DIGAPAHANDI NAC 3 2 0 0 0 1

31 211931 GANJAM NAC 4 2 0 0 0 2

32 211932 GOPALAPUR NAC 3 1 0 0 1 1

33 211933 HINJILICUT NAC 4 3 0 0 0 1

34 211934 KABISURYANAGAR NAC 5 3 0 0 1 1

35 211935 KHALLIKOTE NAC 5 3 0 0 0 2

36 211936 KODALA NAC 2 2 0 0 0 0

37 211937 POLASARA NAC 3 2 0 0 0 1

38 211938 PURUSOTAMPUR NAC 3 2 0 0 1 0

39 211939 RAMBHA NAC 2 2 0 0 0 0

40 211940 SURADA NAC 3 2 0 0 1 0

TOTAL 648 361 0 3 205 79

Remarks: Out of 648 high schools in the district, 361 (55.71%) are govt. secondary schools, 3 (0.46%) are Central Government Secondary Schools or PSUs (KVS/NVS etc), 205(31.64%) are govt. aided (Contributes to the major share of the school’s budget) schools and 79 (12.19%) are private unaided schools. However, out of the 361 govt. Secondary schools only 251 of them are given funding under the RMSA.

49

Table-9

Schools by Category (Ganjam)

Sl No SEMIS

Block Code Block

Secondary Schools

Hr. Sec School

Intermediate/ Junior

College

Degree College with +2

level

Post-Graduate college with +2

& +3 levels

Others

1 211901 ASKA 30 NA NA NA NA NA

2 211902 BEGUNIAPADA 23 NA NA NA NA NA

3 211903 BELLAGUNTHA 21 NA NA NA NA NA

4 211904 BHANJANAGAR 23 NA NA NA NA NA

5 211905 BUGUDA 23 NA NA NA NA NA

6 211906 CHATRAPUR 21 NA NA NA NA NA

7 211907 CHIKITI 18 NA NA NA NA NA

8 211908 DHARAKOTE 19 NA NA NA NA NA

9 211909 DIGAPAHANDI 33 NA NA NA NA NA

10 211910 GANJAM 16 NA NA NA NA NA

11 211911 HINJILICUT 23 NA NA NA NA NA

12 211912 JAGANATHPRASAD 30 NA NA NA NA NA

13 211913 KABISURYANAGAR 22 NA NA NA NA NA

14 211914 KHALLIKOTE 28 NA NA NA NA NA

15 211915 KUKUDAKHANDI 25 NA NA NA NA NA

16 211916 PATRAPUR 28 NA NA NA NA NA

17 211917 POLASARA 26 NA NA NA NA NA

18 211918 PURUSOTAMPUR 28 NA NA NA NA NA

19 211919 RANGEILUNDA 29 NA NA NA NA NA

20 211920 SANAKHEMUNDI 23 NA NA NA NA NA

21 211921 SHERAGADA 25 NA NA NA NA NA

22 211922 SURADA 26 NA NA NA NA NA

23 211923 ASKA NAC 7 NA NA NA NA NA

24 211924 BELLAGUNTHA NAC 2 NA NA NA NA NA

25 211925 BERHAMPUR MPL 46 NA NA NA NA NA

26 211926 BHANJANAGAR NAC 4 NA NA NA NA NA

27 211927 BUGUDA NAC 3 NA NA NA NA NA

28 211928 CHATRAPUR NAC 6 NA NA NA NA NA

29 211929 CHIKITI NAC 3 NA NA NA NA NA

30 211930 DIGAPAHANDI NAC 3 NA NA NA NA NA

31 211931 GANJAM NAC 4 NA NA NA NA NA

32 211932 GOPALAPUR NAC 3 NA NA NA NA NA

33 211933 HINJILICUT NAC 4 NA NA NA NA NA

34 211934 KABISURYANAGAR NAC 5 NA NA NA NA NA

35 211935 KHALLIKOTE NAC 5 NA NA NA NA NA

36 211936 KODALA NAC 2 NA NA NA NA NA

37 211937 POLASARA NAC 3 NA NA NA NA NA

38 211938 PURUSOTAMPUR NAC 3 NA NA NA NA NA

39 211939 RAMBHA NAC 2 NA NA NA NA NA

40 211940 SURADA NAC 3 NA NA NA NA NA

TOTAL 648 NA NA NA NA NA

Comments: Category-wise secondary schools are not available at the DEO Office, Ganjam.

50

Table-10

Teachers Sanctioned and Vacancy in Schools having classes IX-X (Ganjam)

Sl No SEMIS Block

Code Block

Govt. Schools Govt. Aided schools

No. of Govt Sec Schools

No. of Secondary School Teachers

No. of

Govt. Aided

No. of Govt. Aided school Teachers

San

ctio

ned

post

Sch

ools

in p

osi

tion

Vac

ant

San

ctio

ned

post

Sch

ools

in p

osi

tion

Vac

ant

1 211901 ASKA 12 NA NA NA 16 NA NA NA

2 211902 BEGUNIAPADA 9 NA NA NA 13 NA NA NA

3 211903 BELLAGUNTHA 15 NA NA NA 6 NA NA NA

4 211904 BHANJANAGAR 12 NA NA NA 6 NA NA NA

5 211905 BUGUDA 14 NA NA NA 8 NA NA NA

6 211906 CHATRAPUR 12 NA NA NA 7 NA NA NA

7 211907 CHIKITI 14 NA NA NA 4 NA NA NA

8 211908 DHARAKOTE 11 NA NA NA 3 NA NA NA

9 211909 DIGAPAHANDI 19 NA NA NA 11 NA NA NA

10 211910 GANJAM 7 NA NA NA 7 NA NA NA

11 211911 HINJILICUT 12 NA NA NA 11 NA NA NA

12 211912 JAGANATHPRASAD 16 NA NA NA 12 NA NA NA

13 211913 KABISURYANAGAR 14 NA NA NA 5 NA NA NA

14 211914 KHALLIKOTE 17 NA NA NA 8 NA NA NA

15 211915 KUKUDAKHANDI 13 NA NA NA 8 NA NA NA

16 211916 PATRAPUR 14 NA NA NA 11 NA NA NA

17 211917 POLASARA 15 NA NA NA 10 NA NA NA

18 211918 PURUSOTAMPUR 15 NA NA NA 12 NA NA NA

19 211919 RANGEILUNDA 15 NA NA NA 11 NA NA NA

20 211920 SANAKHEMUNDI 13 NA NA NA 10 NA NA NA

21 211921 SHERAGADA 19 NA NA NA 6 NA NA NA

22 211922 SURADA 18 NA NA NA 6 NA NA NA

23 211923 ASKA NAC 3 NA NA NA 1 NA NA NA

24 211924 BELLAGUNTHA NAC 1 NA NA NA 1 NA NA NA

25 211925 BERHAMPUR MPL 15 NA NA NA 7 NA NA NA

26 211926 BHANJANAGAR NAC 4 NA NA NA 0 NA NA NA

27 211927 BUGUDA NAC 3 NA NA NA 0 NA NA NA

28 211928 CHATRAPUR NAC 2 NA NA NA 1 NA NA NA

29 211929 CHIKITI NAC 3 NA NA NA 0 NA NA NA

30 211930 DIGAPAHANDI NAC 2 NA NA NA 0 NA NA NA

31 211931 GANJAM NAC 2 NA NA NA 0 NA NA NA

32 211932 GOPALAPUR NAC 1 NA NA NA 1 NA NA NA

33 211933 HINJILICUT NAC 3 NA NA NA 0 NA NA NA

34 211934 KABISURYANAGAR NAC 3 NA NA NA 1 NA NA NA

35 211935 KHALLIKOTE NAC 3 NA NA NA 0 NA NA NA

36 211936 KODALA NAC 2 NA NA NA 0 NA NA NA

37 211937 POLASARA NAC 2 NA NA NA 0 NA NA NA

38 211938 PURUSOTAMPUR NAC 2 NA NA NA 1 NA NA NA

39 211939 RAMBHA NAC 2 NA NA NA 0 NA NA NA

40 211940 SURADA NAC 2 NA NA NA 1 NA NA NA

TOTAL 361 3265 2656 609 205 0 0 0

GOVT. Schools 251 2605 2190 415

UGHS 110 660 466 194

Remarks: Data available in the DEO office, Ganjam relating to total sanctioned posts of 251 government schools, 110 upgraded high schools and all the 361 schools are respectively 2605, 660 and 3265. The teachers in position in these schools are 2190, 466 and 2656 respectively and the vacant position of number of teachers in the aforesaid schools are 415 (15.93%), 194 (29.93%) and 609 (18.65%) respectively. Data relating to sanction position

51

and vacant posts of 205 government aided schools are not available in the office of the DEO, Ganjam.

Table-11

Status of trained and untrained Teacher in schools having classes IX-X (Ganjam) Sl No SEMIS

Block Code

Block Govt. Schools Govt. Aided schools

No. of Govt Sec

Schools

No. of Secondary School Teachers No. of Govt. Aided Sec.

Schools

No. of Govt. Aided school Teachers

Sanctioned Teachers

Working Teachers

Trained Teachers

Sanctioned Teachers

Working Teachers

Trained Teachers

1 211901 ASKA 12 NA NA NA 16 NA NA NA

2 211902 BEGUNIAPADA 9 NA NA NA 13 NA NA NA

3 211903 BELLAGUNTHA 15 NA NA NA 6 NA NA NA

4 211904 BHANJANAGAR 12 NA NA NA 6 NA NA NA

5 211905 BUGUDA 14 NA NA NA 8 NA NA NA

6 211906 CHATRAPUR 12 NA NA NA 7 NA NA NA

7 211907 CHIKITI 14 NA NA NA 4 NA NA NA

8 211908 DHARAKOTE 11 NA NA NA 3 NA NA NA

9 211909 DIGAPAHANDI 19 NA NA NA 11 NA NA NA

10 211910 GANJAM 7 NA NA NA 7 NA NA NA

11 211911 HINJILICUT 12 NA NA NA 11 NA NA NA

12 211912 JAGANATHPRASAD 16 NA NA NA 12 NA NA NA

13 211913 KABISURYANAGAR 14 NA NA NA 5 NA NA NA

14 211914 KHALLIKOTE 17 NA NA NA 8 NA NA NA

15 211915 KUKUDAKHANDI 13 NA NA NA 8 NA NA NA

16 211916 PATRAPUR 14 NA NA NA 11 NA NA NA

17 211917 POLASARA 15 NA NA NA 10 NA NA NA

18 211918 PURUSOTAMPUR 15 NA NA NA 12 NA NA NA

19 211919 RANGEILUNDA 15 NA NA NA 11 NA NA NA

20 211920 SANAKHEMUNDI 13 NA NA NA 10 NA NA NA

21 211921 SHERAGADA 19 NA NA NA 6 NA NA NA

22 211922 SURADA 18 NA NA NA 6 NA NA NA

23 211923 ASKA NAC 3 NA NA NA 1 NA NA NA

24 211924 BELLAGUNTHA NAC 1 NA NA NA 1 NA NA NA

25 211925 BERHAMPUR MPL 15 NA NA NA 7 NA NA NA

26 211926 BHANJANAGAR NAC 4 NA NA NA 0 NA NA NA

27 211927 BUGUDA NAC 3 NA NA NA 0 NA NA NA

28 211928 CHATRAPUR NAC 2 NA NA NA 1 NA NA NA

29 211929 CHIKITI NAC 3 NA NA NA 0 NA NA NA

30 211930 DIGAPAHANDI NAC 2 NA NA NA 0 NA NA NA

31 211931 GANJAM NAC 2 NA NA NA 0 NA NA NA

32 211932 GOPALAPUR NAC 1 NA NA NA 1 NA NA NA

33 211933 HINJILICUT NAC 3 NA NA NA 0 NA NA NA

34 211934 KABISURYANAGAR NAC 3 NA NA NA 1 NA NA NA

35 211935 KHALLIKOTE NAC 3 NA NA NA 0 NA NA NA

36 211936 KODALA NAC 2 NA NA NA 0 NA NA NA

37 211937 POLASARA NAC 2 NA NA NA 0 NA NA NA

38 211938 PURUSOTAMPUR NAC 2 NA NA NA 1 NA NA NA

39 211939 RAMBHA NAC 2 NA NA NA 0 NA NA NA

40 211940 SURADA NAC 2 NA NA NA 1 NA NA NA

TOTAL 361 205

Remarks: The information on training status of teachers in position is not available at the DEO office, Ganjam.

52

Table-12

No of Secondary Schools having SMDCs Sl

No. Block

SEMIS Block No. of SMDCs

constituted No. of SMDCs

having Bank A/c No. of Schools having Academic Committee

No. of Schools having Building Committee

No. of Schools having parents Teachers

Association

Guidelines issued regarding

set up of mentioned

bodies(Y/N) Govt. and

Local Bodies Govt. aided

Govt. and Local Bodies

Govt. aided


Govt. aided


Govt. aided


Govt. aided

1 211901 ASKA 12 16 12 16 12 16 12 16 12 16 Y

2 211902 BEGUNIAPADA 9 13 9 13 9 13 9 13 9 13 Y

3 211903 BELLAGUNTHA 15 6 15 6 15 6 15 6 15 6 Y

4 211904 BHANJANAGAR 12 6 12 6 12 6 12 6 12 6 Y

5 211905 BUGUDA 14 8 14 8 14 8 14 8 14 8 Y

6 211906 CHATRAPUR 12 7 12 7 12 7 12 7 12 7 Y

7 211907 CHIKITI 14 4 14 4 14 4 14 4 14 4 Y

8 211908 DHARAKOTE 11 3 11 3 11 3 11 3 11 3 Y

9 211909 DIGAPAHANDI 19 11 19 11 19 11 19 11 19 11 Y

10 211910 GANJAM 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Y

11 211911 HINJILICUT 12 11 12 11 12 11 12 11 12 11 Y

12 211912 JAGANATHPRASAD 16 12 16 12 16 12 16 12 16 12 Y

13 211913 KABISURYANAGAR 14 5 14 5 14 5 14 5 14 5 Y

14 211914 KHALLIKOTE 17 8 17 8 17 8 17 8 17 8 Y

15 211915 KUKUDAKHANDI 13 8 13 8 13 8 13 8 13 8 Y

16 211916 PATRAPUR 14 11 14 11 14 11 14 11 14 11 Y

17 211917 POLASARA 15 10 15 10 15 10 15 10 15 10 Y

18 211918 PURUSOTAMPUR 15 12 15 12 15 12 15 12 15 12 Y

19 211919 RANGEILUNDA 15 11 15 11 15 11 15 11 15 11 Y

20 211920 SANAKHEMUNDI 13 10 13 10 13 10 13 10 13 10 Y

21 211921 SHERAGADA 19 6 19 6 19 6 19 6 19 6 Y

22 211922 SURADA 18 6 18 6 18 6 18 6 18 6 Y

23 211923 ASKA NAC 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 Y

24 211924 BELLAGUNTHA NAC 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Y

25 211925 BERHAMPUR MPL 15 7 15 7 15 7 15 7 15 7 Y

26 211926 BHANJANAGAR NAC 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 Y

27 211927 BUGUDA NAC 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 Y

28 211928 CHATRAPUR NAC 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 Y

29 211929 CHIKITI NAC 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 Y

30 211930 DIGAPAHANDI NAC 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 Y

53

Sl

No. Block

SEMIS Block No. of SMDCs constituted No. of SMDCs

having Bank A/c No. of Schools having Academic Committee

No. of Schools having Building Committee

No. of Schools having parents Teachers Association

Guidelines issued regarding set up of mentioned bodies(Y/N)


Govt. aided


Govt. aided


Govt. aided


Govt. aided


Govt. aided

31 211931 GANJAM NAC 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 Y

32 211932 GOPALAPUR NAC 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Y

33 211933 HINJILICUT NAC 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 Y

34 211934 KABISURYANAGAR NAC 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 Y

35 211935 KHALLIKOTE NAC 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 Y

36 211936 KODALA NAC 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 Y

37 211937 POLASARA NAC 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 Y

38 211938 PURUSOTAMPUR NAC 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 Y

39 211939 RAMBHA NAC 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 Y

40 211940 SURADA NAC 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 Y

TOTAL 361 205 361 205 361 205 361 205 361 205

Comments: All the 361 govt. secondary schools and 205 govt. aided schools are having SMDC (School Management & Development Committee), separate bank accounts, academic committee, building committee side by side PTA (Parents Teachers Association) as well as issued guidelines to form all such committees.

54

1. Whether the District Level Plan has been prepared Yes , it is prepared 2(a) Whether District Plan have adopted a convergence approach with the following departments. (1. Yes 2. No)

a. Water & Sanitation - 1

b. Social Welfare - 1

c. Tribal Development - 1

d. Minority department - 2

e. Rural Development - 1

f. Urban Development - 1

g. Medical Health & Family welfare - 1

h. PWD - 1

i. Transportation (Roadways) - 2

j. Others- 2

2(b) Are there any problem areas of restructuring on convergence and co-ordination.

Remarks: Yes, there are some hilly areas which have water /Electricity/Internet problem of restructuring on convergence and co-ordination.

3. Methods adopted for regular monitoring of Perspective Plan and AWP&B

Remarks: SIP & UDISE method are adopted for regular monitoring of Perspective Plan and AWP & Budget

Table-13

Availability & usability of following provision of alternative electric power supply

Availability Total Schools with %

District Generator Inverter Gobar Gas Plant

Solar Panels

Wind Electricity

Ganjam 361(ICT Lab.) 0 0 0 0 361 (100)

Note-Figures in parentheses represent percent to respective totals

Remarks: All 361 RMSA funded schools are provided generator under ICT programme.

Table-14

Library Design- Availability of the following

Sufficient Seating Space, Proper Light & Ventilation Regular Pest Control


Ganjam 15 (4.16%) 346 361

(100)

0 361

361

(100)

Remarks: According to the information provided by the DEO office library rooms in 15 government schools are available with sufficient seating space, proper lighting and ventilation system. But regular pest control of the library is not possible due to lack of fund.

55

Table-15

Laboratory Design

Adequate space for physics, chem., biology, etc

Proper height of lab table

Cross ventilation & Exhaust Fan

Availability of Running Water


Yes No Total with %

Yes No Total with %

Yes No Total with %

Ganjam 15 (4.16%)

346 361

(100)

15 (4.16%)

346 361

(100)

15 (4.16%)

346 361

(100)

15 (4.16%)

346 361

(100)

Note-Figures in parentheses refer to percentage.

Remarks: At present, only 15 (4.16%) schools out of 361 government schools have laboratory with adequate space, proper height of tables, cross ventilation and availability of running water.

Table-16

Safety aspect of Building Design Condition of

Building

No. of Schools with special structural facility to cope with natural hazards

The Width of the staircases is sufficient or not

District Good Bad Total with %

Flood Cyclone Earth-quake

Flood & Cyclone

No Total with %

Sufficient Not Sufficient

Total with %

Ganjam 30 331 361 NA NA NA NA NA 0 NA NA 0

Comments: The information relating to safety aspect of building design is not available except condition of school buildings which reveals that out of 361 schools, only 30 (8.31%) of them are in good condition.

Table-17

Disaster Preparedness Plan Available or not Disaster

preparedness plan & Emergency Evacuation plan

Awareness about disaster & received training to handle

Fire extinguishers available

Trained to handle fire extinguishers

Availability of contact no of ambulance, hospital & fire brigade

District Yes No Total

with %

Stud-

e nts

Teach-

ers

Total

with %

Kit

chen

Lab

oratory

Total

with %

Yes No Total

with %

Yes No Total

with %

Ganjam NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

Comments: The information on disaster preparedness and emergency evacuation plan is not available in the DEO office, Ganjam.

Table-18

Schools with ongoing construction activity Ongoing construction

activities Type of construction


New school building

Strengthening of existing school/ Repair work

No Total with %

Ganjam

112

(31.02)

249

(68.98)

361

(100)

23

(6.37)

89

(24.65)

249

(68.98)

361

(100)

N.B : Figures in parentheses are representing per cent .

Remarks: Out of 361 government schools, ongoing construction activities are reported in 112(31.02%) schools. Of that 23 (6.37%) are for construction of new school buildings and repair work for strengthening of existing buildings are under progress in 89 (24.65%) schools of the district.

56

Table-19

Total number of schools with ongoing civil work in district. Construction Level

No. of schools

Number of visit

Avg. no. of visit/school

No. of Authenti-cation made

Avg. no. of Authenti-cation

Instruction given in No. of schools

Recorded Not recorded

Foundation NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

Plinth NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

Lintel NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

Roof Level NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

Flooring NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

Finishing NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

N.B – School Authority have no power on ongoing construction activities.

Comments: Details information on ongoing civil/construction activities are not available in DEO office, Ganjam, as construction work is taken up Rural Development Depratment, Govt. Of Odisha.

Table-20

Description of SMDC members

Members Number Avg. No. of members per School

Avg. Attendance in recent meeting

Ganjam Ganjam Ganjam

Total members 6137 17 4082

Women members 361 1 282

SC/ST members 1083 3 529

Student guardian 361 1 273

Selected members 3249 9 1387

Nominated members 1083 3 642

N.B – Women members – SHG-1, Student Guardian-1, among SC/ST, SC-1, ST-2, Selected members-9, Nominated-3 according to the guidelines of RMSA.

Remarks: There are 6137 members in SMDC (School Management & Development Committee) for 361RMSA funded schools constituted with representative members selected as per RMSA guidelines.

Table-21

Status of DCF

District Data Entry done School report cards

Sample checking School report cards distributed to all schools

Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No

Ganjam 361 0 361 0 361 0 361 0

Overall finding of sampled checking

Remarks: Data entry work has been done; data capture format is duly filled in and submitted by 361 schools. School report cards are also distributed to all schools. 4. Has the data been submitted to State level as per time schedule? Yes 5. At which level the data is being analyzed and disseminated? At the State level.

Table-22

Awareness of school authorities regarding importance of data collected under MIS and if so, are

they using it?

District Awareness about data’s information Use of data being made

GANJAM Yes No Yes No

0 361 0 361

57

Comments: It is reported that the school authorities are unaware regarding importance of data collected under MIS. 7. Is SEMIS/UDISE data used for Planning and budgeting? Yes

8. Is the back up of the data supplied under SEMIS/UDISE properly maintained? Yes

Financial Management (At School, DPO level)

Table-23

Nature of financial records and their maintenance and Bank reconciliation

District Records maintained & updated on daily basis Bank reconciliation done on monthly basis Cash Book

Ganjam Yes No Yes No

361 0 361 0

Remarks: All the government secondary schools of the district covered under RMSA are reported to be maintaining their cash books on daily basis and doing bank reconciliation of their accounts on monthly basis.

Table-24

Mode of transfer of funds to the SMDC from State/District level.

District From DPO to SMDC Mode of Transfer

Cheque Draft E-transfer

Ganjam 0 0 361

Comments: All the 361 government secondary schools receive their funds through E-transfer. However, it is reported by the Head Masters of surveyed schools that often they fail to get proper information from the DEO office about the e-transfer of RMSA grants and instructions about mode of use of such grants. At District Level

Table-25

Type of funds/grants allocated by the district to schools Ganjam

Name of grant allocated No. of Schools Month of allocation

SAG 356 NA

MRG 356 NA

Exposer visit 356 NA

Remedial Class 356 NA

SIP 0 NA

SMDC Training 356 NA

Samarthaya Training 356 NA

Science lab furniture 120 NA

Library Furniture 60 NA

Sahajog-3

Remarks: The above numbers of schools were sanctioned and allotted funds/grants in the financial year 2014-15, but month of allocation is not available.

4. Audit of SDMCs Table-26

All SDMCs in State/District are covered by audit

District Audit carried out If yes, Audit carried out by

Yes No Total with %

Education Deptt.

A.G C.A Social Audit

None Total with %

Ganjam 5 (1.39%)

356 (98.61%)

361 (100)

0 0 5 (1.39%)

0 356 (98.61%)

361 (100)

58

Comments: Out of 361 government secondary schools covered under RMSA, only five (1.39%) schools have carried out audit by the Chartered Accountants and in the rest 356 (98.61%) schools no audit is carried out by any competent agency/institution until the date of monitoring.

5. Social Auditing Table-27

Display of financial information on notice board/wall of the School/office for the

purpose of social audit District Display of financial information (receipts & payments) and timely entered

Yes No Total with %

Ganjam 0 361(100) 361(100)

Comments: None of the RMSA funded schools in the district displays financial level information of RMSA for the purpose of social audit.

Table-28

Any instance of community mobilizing resources for the school.

District Instance of community mobilizing resources If yes, details thereof Yes No Total with %

Ganjam 0 361(100) 361(100)

Comments: No information in details is available at the DEO level relating to any instance of community level mobilization of resources for the development of schools. However, it is found that in some of the surveyed schools the local community has rendered assistance to the SMDC on school development work in terms of both labour and materials.

Table-29

Status of utilization certificates submitted by SMDCs to DPO (At District Level)

District Total No. of

Schools

No. of SMDCs from which U.C

is received

Period for which U.C submitted No. of Schools 2013-14 2014-15

Ganjam 361(100) 356 356 345 361

Remarks: The SMDCs in all the 361 schools of the district covered under RMSA grants have not submitted UCs to the DPO in time. It is found that 356 of the SMDCs submitted the UCs in 2013-14 and 345 in 2014-15 to the DPO.

59

Table-30

Detail of expenditure of funds by SMDC in sampled schools (from 15 April to till date) district. Grant Funds

S.N Name of School

SAG Minor Repair Major repair grant Civil Work Educational tour Others

Receipt Spent Unspent balance






1 Baulagam High School

50000 50000 0 25000 25000 0 1700 1700 0

2 Govt High

School, Berhampur

50000 50000 0 25000 25000 0 1700 1700 0

3 S L N M High

School, Courtpeta

50000 50000 0 25000 25000 0 1700 1700 0

4 Rambha High School,

Rambha

50000 50000 0 25000 25000 0 1700 1700 0

5 P T High School, Palur

50000 50000 0 25000 25000 0 1700 1700 0

6 Sundareswar High School

50000 50000 0 25000 25000 0 1700 1700 0

7 R C M High School, Kanheipur

50000 50000 0 25000 25000 0 1700 1700 0

8 Govt UG High

School, Khojapalli

50000 50000 0 25000 25000 0 1700 1700 0

9 Badakusasthali High School

50000 50000 0 25000 25000 0 1700 1700 0

10 Rambha Girls High School

50000 50000 0 25000 25000 0 1700 1700 0

11 R T Vidyapitha, Pratap Pur

50000 50000 0 25000 25000 0 1700 1700 0

12 Chamakhandi

High School

50000 50000 0 25000 25000 0 1700 1700 0

13 S N Bidyapitha,

Tanganapalli

50000 50000 0 25000 25000 0 1700 1700 0

14 V V Giri Secondary

50000 50000 0 25000 25000 0 1700 1700 0

60

Training School for Women

15 Brundaban Bidyapitha

50000 50000 0 25000 25000 0 1700 1700 0

16 Govt Girls High School, Aska

50000 50000 0 25000 25000 0 1700 1700 0

17 Bhagabati Bidyapitha

50000 50000 0 25000 25000 0 1700 1700 0

18 Hari Hara

High School

50000 50000 0 25000 25000 0 1700 1700 0

19 Govt High School, Kanchuapada

50000 50000 0 25000 25000 0 1700 1700 0

20 Utkal Bidyapitha High School

50000 50000 0 25000 25000 0 1700 1700 0

21 Govt UG High School, Purunapatana

50000 50000 0 25000 25000 0 1700 1700 0

22 Bhairabi High School

50000 50000 0 25000 25000 0 1700 1700 0

23 M M High School,

Girisola

50000 50000 0 25000 25000 0 1700 1700 0

24 Ghatipari High School

50000 50000 0 25000 25000 0 1700 1700 0

25 Mukteswar Bidyapitha, Surla

50000 50000 0 25000 25000 0 1700 1700 0

Remarks: In the year 2015-16 only School Annual Grant @ 50000/, MRG @ Rs 25000/ and other grants @Rs.1700/ for 25 sampled RMSA funded schools has been sanctioned by the DEO office and utilised. Detailed information for all the schools of the district iwas not available from the DEO, Ganjam.

61

School Annual Grant

Table-31 Month of receiving School Annual Grant for the financial year 2014-15 in sampled Schools and

status of utilization of funds

District Month of receipt of SAG Number of Schools In %

Ganjam 15.12.2014 25 100.00

Comments: In the year 2014-15, all the 25 sample schools have received their school annual grant and utilised it fully.

Table-32

Status of utilization of funds with % and expenditure done as per norms of the scheme S.

N.

Name of the School Sanctione

d amount

Month of

receipt

Expenditu

re till date

% of

expenditure











11 R T Vidyapitha, Pratap Pur 50000 15.12.2014 50000 100



14 V V Giri Secondary Training School for Women 50000 15.12.2014 50000 100

15 Brundaban Bidyapitha 50000 15.12.2014 50000 100


17 Bhagabati Bidyapitha 50000 15.12.2014 50000 100



20 Utkal Bidyapitha High School 50000 15.12.2014 50000 100





25 Mukteswar Bidyapitha, Surla 50000 15.12.2014 50000 100

Remarks: In the year 2014-15 School Annual Grant @ 50000 sanctioned by DEO office to 25 RMSA funded schools on dated 15.12.2014 and utilised fully.

Table-33 Status of Utilization of School Annual Grant

Details/No. of Schools

Which were not sanctioned SAGs Which were sanctioned but did not receive SAGs

Which received but did not spend?

All 25 schools received SAGs NA NA

Remarks: All 25 schools have received SAGs and other cases does not arise.

62

Table-34

Utilization of SAG as per norms SAG funds utilized on works

Number of Schools

%

Funds utilized as per norms in number of Schools


Yes % No %

1.White wash 25 100 25 100 0 0 N.A.

2.Wall painting 25 100 25 100 0 0 N.A.

3.Local innovation 25 100 25 100 0 0 N.A.

5.Sanitary work 25 100 25 100 0 0 N.A.

Comments: All the 25 sample government secondary schools of the district were provided with RMSA grants in 2014-15 and they have utilized the funds as per norms.

Minor Repair Grant

Table-35 Receipt of Minor Repair Grant – (For Financial Year 2013-14)

Sl.

No

Name of the School Sanctioned

amount

Month of

receipt

Expenditu

re till date

% of

expenditure











11 R T Vidyapitha, Pratap Pur 25000 26.03.2014 25000 100



14 V V Giri Secondary Training School for Women 25000 26.03.2014 25000 100

15 Brundaban Bidyapitha 25000 26.03.2014 25000 100


17 Bhagabati Bidyapitha 25000 26.03.2014 25000 100



20 Utkal Bidyapitha High School 25000 26.03.2014 25000 100





25 Mukteswar Bidyapitha, Surla 25000 26.03.2014 25000 100

Remarks: All the sampled schools surveyed by the monitoring team have made full utilization of their minor repair grant received at the fag end of the financial year 2013-14 and that too as per the norms and guidelines of RMSA.

Table-36

Utilization of minor repair grant on repair and white-wash of the School Building

District Total no of schools who received minor repair grant

Number of Schools utilized the grant on repair and white wash

Number of schools who did not utilized fund as per norms

Utilization (in %)

Ganjam 25 25 Nil 100.00

FOURTH QUARTERLY MONITORING REPORT OF RASHTRIYA MADHYAMIK...

Documents

Transcript of FOURTH QUARTERLY MONITORING REPORT OF RASHTRIYA MADHYAMIK...