Fort William Feb 2012

124
1 A tailor made local authority training package WELCOME

description

Cycling Scotland course on planning and designing for cyclists. The course was held in Fort William and looked at the local area and identified improvements to the local cycle routes.

Transcript of Fort William Feb 2012

Page 1: Fort William Feb 2012

1

A tailor made local authority training package 

WELCOME

Page 2: Fort William Feb 2012

2

Argyll and Bute & Highland COUNCIL

TRAINING DAYProviding training to deliver solutions

Page 3: Fort William Feb 2012

3

MODULE 2: PLANNING AND DESIGNING FOR CYCLISTS

22nd February 2012 Fort William Peter Leslie

Providing training to deliver solutions

Page 4: Fort William Feb 2012

4

Questions?

NameJob RoleAchievement in WorkQuestion on Designing for Cyclists

Page 5: Fort William Feb 2012

5

WHAT WILL YOU LEARN TODAY?

Page 6: Fort William Feb 2012

6

LEARNING OUTCOMES

Be aware of and be able to: Design for cyclists

Page 7: Fort William Feb 2012

7

LEARNING OUTCOMES

Be aware of and be able to:

Design for cyclists Summarise Shared

Use DDA (Equality) Compliance

Page 8: Fort William Feb 2012

8

LEARNING OUTCOMES

Be aware of and be able to: Design for cyclists Summarise Shared Use

DDA (Equality) Compliance Key Aspects of Design

Manuals

Page 9: Fort William Feb 2012

9

LEARNING OUTCOMES

Be aware of and be able to: Design for cyclists Summarise Shared Use DDA

(Equality) Compliance Key Aspects of Design

Manuals On site Review (inc

Signage)

Page 10: Fort William Feb 2012

10

Designing for Cyclists in your Area

Page 11: Fort William Feb 2012

11

Policy Drivers

Sustainability & Climate Change

Health Peak Oil Economics Congestion

Page 12: Fort William Feb 2012

12

Long distance Routes in particular for your councils

Sustainable tourism development

Stimulate local businesses Local community interest:

knowledge and exchanges Healthy Living-encourages

physical activity Improvements of

environment: green corridors

Page 13: Fort William Feb 2012

13

The model of spending

Page 14: Fort William Feb 2012

14

The results in NE case study area for 2006

NSCR – NE England (2006) using the model

Tourism demand 67,826

Groups @ 2.36 average group size 6631

SpendingEuro3.8 million

Page 15: Fort William Feb 2012

15

Local Cycle/Shared use Routes

Argyll and Bute Council 8 Communities

Hitrans Active Travel Audits

Highland Council European Funding

Page 16: Fort William Feb 2012

16

Council Promotion

Page 17: Fort William Feb 2012

17

Sustrans Report – Recent Funding

http://www.sustrans.org.uk/sustrans-near-you/scotland/scotland-news In 2010 an indicative spend by recreational and touring cyclists is estimated at

almost £100million. Using the World Health Organisation’s Health Economy Assessment Tool (HEAT) it

is estimated that in 2010 the Network contributed £60million in health benefits. Cost to benefit ratios based on STAG appraisal range from 1.4:1 to 12.7:1. LOCAL BENEFIT

Page 18: Fort William Feb 2012

18

CAPS

At Cycling Scotland’s November 2007 conference delegates voted for a National Cycling Action Plan

In May 2008 Stewart Stevenson MSP announced the launch of the Cycling Action Plan for Scotland.

February 2009 the Minister announces that the vision for CAPS is that “By 2020 10% of all journeys taken in Scotland will be by bike”

Page 19: Fort William Feb 2012

19

Cycle Action Plan for Scotland

CAPS

Page 20: Fort William Feb 2012

20

THE PRINCIPLES

Hierarchy of Users

Page 21: Fort William Feb 2012

21

Hierarchy of Users

Any ideas?

Page 22: Fort William Feb 2012

22

Hierarchy of Users

Any ideas?

Page 23: Fort William Feb 2012

23

HIERARCHY OF USERS Pedestrians and those with impaired

mobility Cyclists Public transport users (including taxis) Goods and service deliveries Car borne shoppers Car borne commuters and visitors

Page 24: Fort William Feb 2012

24

Types of Users

Any ideas?

Page 25: Fort William Feb 2012

25

Page 26: Fort William Feb 2012

26

TYPES OF CYCLISTS TO DESIGN FOR

Skill Level • Novice; • Intermediate;

and • Experienced.

(Based on CBD 2010)

Page 27: Fort William Feb 2012

27

Journeys completed by Cyclists

Neighbourhood Commuting School Day Trips Touring Sports

(Based on CBD 2010)

Page 28: Fort William Feb 2012

28

DESIGN PRINCIPLES – CDB 2010

Coherence Directness Safety Comfort Attractiveness

Page 29: Fort William Feb 2012

29

Exercise

Capture your thoughts

Design Principles

Page 30: Fort William Feb 2012

30

Coherence

- Continuous- Link origins and

destinations- Legible signing- Consistent

colours

Page 31: Fort William Feb 2012

31

Directness

- Minimise delays

- Follow desire lines

- Give advantage

Page 32: Fort William Feb 2012

32

Directness

- Defined routes in areas can minimise conflict

Page 33: Fort William Feb 2012

33

SAFETY

Personal security- Lighting - Rural Aspects - Information (Recovery)

Page 34: Fort William Feb 2012

34

SAFETY

Traffic safety- Perceived - Actual

Page 35: Fort William Feb 2012

35

COMFORT

- No debris- No obstructions- Flush kerbs- Traffic and climate

mitigation

Page 36: Fort William Feb 2012

36

ATTRACTIVENESS

- Complementary- Integrated- Inviting

landscaping

Page 37: Fort William Feb 2012

37

Design Principles

Coherence –

Door step Directness –

Time Saving Safety –

Feel Safe Comfort –

Surface Attractiveness –

Fit Surroundings

Page 38: Fort William Feb 2012

38

Page 39: Fort William Feb 2012

39

Design Manuals Group Exercises

List the design manuals you currently use

What information would you look for within the manual and how would you use the manuals?

Page 40: Fort William Feb 2012

40

www.satinonline.org

Page 42: Fort William Feb 2012

42

Sustrans Publications - Guidelines

Connect 2 and Greenway Design Guide – 2007 The NCN – Guidelines and Practical Details -

1997 Making Ways for the Bicycle – 1994 www.sustrans.org.uk/resources

Page 43: Fort William Feb 2012

43

Active Travel Design Manuals

UK – TFL – London Design Standards Scotland – TS – Designing Streets

Page 44: Fort William Feb 2012

44

Active Travel Design Internet

www.cyclingengland.co.uk www.ctc.org.uk/Benchmarking www.cyclingresourcecentre.org.au/ www.fietsberaad.nl/

Page 45: Fort William Feb 2012

45

Sustrans Publications – Notes

Technical Information Notes – Current - Available from Sustrans

Information Sheets – Some are Dated - Available from Website

Page 46: Fort William Feb 2012

46

Path Construction

Countryside Access Design Guide Lowland Path Construction Upland Path Management Scottish Access Technical Information Network

(SATIN)

Page 47: Fort William Feb 2012

47

Other Design Manuals Equestrian –

British Horse Society www.iprow.co.uk

• Disabled Users• Fieldfare Trust• http://91.135.228.71/$sitepreview/phototrails-dev.org/default.cfm?

walk=Devon-Way---Fishcross-to-Devonside&page=trail&walk_id=70

• Walker• www.livingstreets.org.uk/scotland

• Cyclist• Natural Surface Trails by Design• Trail Solutions - IMBA

Page 48: Fort William Feb 2012

48

Any questions?

Coffee / Tea

Page 49: Fort William Feb 2012

49

Workshop 1 – Actual Route Objectives

1.Remove Physical Barrier

2.Segregated Facility3.Quality Infrastructure –

Central Station – Destination

4.Deprived Area5.Active Travel and

Route Connections

Page 50: Fort William Feb 2012

50

Workshop – On/Off Road Design

On/Off Road Design – Split into your groups and discuss the provisions including the width of cycle facility you would install on North Claremont Street and Berkeley Street:

Page 51: Fort William Feb 2012

51

Workshop - On Road Design

Waterloo StreetOne Way Street – Towards

M83 Travelling Lanes – Bus

Stops/RouteNorth Side of Street –

Horizontal Parking

Page 52: Fort William Feb 2012

52

Existing Route - CharacteristicsTown CentreGrid PlanMain East / West LinksOrigin / DestinationRoute set by Bridge and Station

Page 53: Fort William Feb 2012

53

Workshop – On Road Design

On Road Designs – Split into your groups and discuss the provisions including the width of cycle facility you would install on Waterloo Street:

Page 54: Fort William Feb 2012

54

REDISTRIBUTION OF THE CARRIAGEWAY

Lane Width?

Page 55: Fort William Feb 2012

55

REDISTRIBUTION OF THE CARRIAGEWAY

Lane Width?

Page 56: Fort William Feb 2012

56

REDISTRIBUTION OF THE CARRIAGEWAY

Lane Width?

Page 57: Fort William Feb 2012

57

REDISTRIBUTION OF THE CARRIAGEWAY

Lane Width?

Page 58: Fort William Feb 2012

58

REDISTRIBUTION OF THE CARRIAGEWAY

Lane Width?

Page 59: Fort William Feb 2012

59

Tables and Design Aids

Page 60: Fort William Feb 2012

60Cycle Lane Through Road JunctionMunich, Germany

Photo: Raheel Khan

Page 61: Fort William Feb 2012

61Cycle Lane Through Bus StopDublin, Ireland

Photo: Tom Bertulis

Page 62: Fort William Feb 2012

62Coloured Cycle lane across junctionCopenhagen, Denmark

Photo: Tom Bertulis

Page 63: Fort William Feb 2012

63Innovative speed hump with cycle bypassCopenhagen, Denmark

Photo: Tom Bertulis

Page 64: Fort William Feb 2012

64Cycle lane, Door opening stripGlasgow, Scotland

Photo: Tom Bertulis

Page 65: Fort William Feb 2012

65Photo: Tom Bertulis

Cycle Lanes with cycle bypasses on both sidesAyr, Scotland

Photo: Tom Bertulis

Page 66: Fort William Feb 2012

66Double Cycle Lane on approach to junctionGlasgow, Scotland

Photo: Tom Bertulis

Photo: Tom Bertulis

Page 67: Fort William Feb 2012

67Door opening stripDublin, Ireland

Photo: Tom Bertulis

Page 68: Fort William Feb 2012

68Coloured 2.5m Cycle Lane Through Road JunctionMunich, Germany

Photo: Raheel Khan

Page 69: Fort William Feb 2012

69Centre Cycle lane London, England

Photo: Tom Bertulis

Page 70: Fort William Feb 2012

702 metre wide Cycle LogoCopenhagen, Netherlands

Photo: Tom Bertulis

Page 71: Fort William Feb 2012

712 metre wide Cycle LogoCopenhagen, Netherlands

Photo: Tom Bertulis

Page 72: Fort William Feb 2012

72Cyclist in Cycle-Bus laneEdinburgh, Scotland

Photo: Tom Bertulis

Page 73: Fort William Feb 2012

73Cycle Lane along Motor Vehicle Lane and Tram line Amsterdam, Netherlands

Photo: Tom Bertulis

Page 74: Fort William Feb 2012

74Cycle Lane through Road JunctionBerlin, Germany

Photo: Tom Bertulis

Page 75: Fort William Feb 2012

75Cycle lane Crossing with Elephant’s Feet MarkingsAmsterdam, Netherlands

Photo: Tom Bertulis

Page 76: Fort William Feb 2012

76Bus-Cycle-Taxi LaneGlasgow, Scotland

Photo: Tom Bertulis

Page 77: Fort William Feb 2012

77Cycle lane Amsterdam, Netherlands

Photo: Tom Bertulis

Page 78: Fort William Feb 2012

78

THE HIERARCHY OF PROVISION

Stakeholders and Users – Wish us to invest money in off road networks

Page 79: Fort William Feb 2012

79

ARE CYCLISTS SAFER ON OFF-ROAD CYCLE TRACKS?

Page 80: Fort William Feb 2012

80

NO.

(the long answer: it depends)

Page 81: Fort William Feb 2012

81

… PROVIDING CYCLE TRACKS IS ONE OF YOUR LAST CHOICES

Hierarchy of Provision(1) Traffic Reduction(2) Traffic Calming(3) Junction Treatment(4) Carriageway Redistribution(5) Segregated Facilities(6) Conversion of Footway

First Priority

Last Priority

Page 82: Fort William Feb 2012

82

Page 83: Fort William Feb 2012

83

So what is the solution?

Page 84: Fort William Feb 2012

84

Photo by Rob Marshall, ERCDT

Page 85: Fort William Feb 2012

85

Photo by Rob Marshall, ERCDT

Page 86: Fort William Feb 2012

86

Other Options Cycling by Design

Side Road Crossing – Bend Out

There are other options but due to it being adjacent to a trunk road this was preferred

Page 87: Fort William Feb 2012

87

Photo by Patrick Lingwood, ERCDT

Page 88: Fort William Feb 2012

88

Other Options Side Road Crossing – Surfacing

On Road Give Way Markings

Page 89: Fort William Feb 2012

89

Page 90: Fort William Feb 2012

90

Crossings

Design Site SpecificOne size does not fit all

Crossing AttributesSimpleField of Vision for All usersDecision Making

Cycling by DesignTransport for London

Page 91: Fort William Feb 2012

91

Signing Routes

What must we comply with?

What is there to help us?

Page 92: Fort William Feb 2012

92

Signing Routes Who should we be

signing for? What should would be

signing? How do we get our

message across?

Page 93: Fort William Feb 2012

93Directional signing with route number for cyclists Glasgow, Scotland

Photo: Tom Bertulis

Page 94: Fort William Feb 2012

94“Cyclists Rejoin Road” SignDumfries and Galloway, Scotland

Photo: Tom Bertulis

Page 95: Fort William Feb 2012

95“Cycle Lane Look Both Ways” SignDumfries and Galloway, Scotland

Photo: Tom Bertulis

Page 96: Fort William Feb 2012

96“Cyclists and Pedestrians Only” marking along beachfront pathwayTroon, Scotland

Photo: Tom Bertulis

Page 97: Fort William Feb 2012

97Shared use signGlasgow, Scotland

Photo: Tom Bertulis

Page 98: Fort William Feb 2012

98

Signing Routes

Sustrans – Technical Information - Note 5

It must comply with TSRGD

Liability / Risk

Page 99: Fort William Feb 2012

99

Lunch

Page 100: Fort William Feb 2012

100

Instead of us going on about the different users we would like to show you the following video. We think this shows the different users perspective and requirements.

Remember by 2025, disabled people will have the same opportunities and choices as non-disabled people on travel choices

http://www.transportscotland.gov.uk/road/Roads-for-All-Conference-2010-video

Disable Discrimination Act Compliance

Page 102: Fort William Feb 2012

102

DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION ACT 1995

Fieldfare Trust - http://www.fieldfare.org.uk

Page 103: Fort William Feb 2012

103

Devon Way Audit - Promoting Countryside Access for Disabled People - Phototrails

http://91.135.228.71/$sitepreview/phototrails- dev.org/default.cfm?walk=Devon-Way---Fishcross-to-Devonside&page=trail&walk_id=70

Page 104: Fort William Feb 2012

104

Page 105: Fort William Feb 2012

105

Site Visit

Page 106: Fort William Feb 2012

106

DiscussSite Visit

Sheets

Page 107: Fort William Feb 2012

107

PLANNING AND DESIGNING FOR CYCLISTS- GOOD AND BAD (MOSTLY) PRACTICE

Some learning opportunities

Page 108: Fort William Feb 2012

108

LEARNING OPPORTUNITIES

Page 109: Fort William Feb 2012

109

LEARNING OPPORTUNITIES

Page 110: Fort William Feb 2012

110

LEARNING OPPORTUNITIES

Page 111: Fort William Feb 2012

111

LEARNING OPPORTUNITIES

Page 112: Fort William Feb 2012

112

LEARNING OPPORTUNITIES

David Kemp

Page 113: Fort William Feb 2012

113

LEARNING OPPORTUNITIES

Page 114: Fort William Feb 2012

114

LEARNING OPPORTUNITIES

Page 115: Fort William Feb 2012

115

LEARNING OPPORTUNITIES

Page 116: Fort William Feb 2012

116

SUMMARYWe’ve looked at: The key principles of providing for cyclists

(including the hierarchy of solutions) How to plan, identify and implement a cycle

network The impact of the Disability Discrimination Act and shared use principles

How to differentiate between good and bad practice

Page 117: Fort William Feb 2012

117

Page 118: Fort William Feb 2012

118

Your turn

Action Plan and Course Evaluation

Page 119: Fort William Feb 2012

119

Cycle Audit and Review

Page 120: Fort William Feb 2012

120

Key Audit Stages and Types

Audit Types 

1.D

esig

n b

rief

2.F

easib

ility stu

dy

3.P

relim

inary

desig

n

4.D

eta

iled d

esig

n

5.S

ubsta

ntia

l co

mple

tion

6.P

ost-o

penin

g

7.A

fter 1

-3 y

ears

DMRB NMU     x x x    

IHT SA   x x x x    

IHT CA x   x x x    

COPECAT   x x x x    

OX CC VRU (Edinburgh) x x   x x x  

Cyclability           x  x

Page 121: Fort William Feb 2012

121

Latest Information John Parkin – University of Bolton – Risk

Assessment Designing for Streets – Quality Audits

Local Authority – How do you audit/review cyclists?

Page 122: Fort William Feb 2012

122

PLANNING THE NETWORK - TOOLS

London Cycle Network CRISP Procedure

Cycle

Route

Implementation &

Stakeholder

Plan

Page 123: Fort William Feb 2012

FINAL QUESTIONS?

Providing training to deliver solutions

Page 124: Fort William Feb 2012

Providing training to deliver solutions

THANK YOU

Peter Leslie