Formulating for age: Measuring food perception &...
Transcript of Formulating for age: Measuring food perception &...
Innovation | Nutrition | Regulatory | Safety | Insight
Formulating for age:
Measuring food perception & appeal
Cindy Beeren, Director of Consumer, Sensory & Market Insight
17th November 2015
2© Leatherhead Research Limited 2015 www.leatherheadfood.com
Oil & gas technology
consulting
Science & technology
innovation, market
intelligence and
business strategy
Science & technology
advisory services for
food & drink
Product & technology
development for the
medical, consumer,
industrial & oil & gas
markets
3© Leatherhead Research Limited 2015 www.leatherheadfood.com
Agenda
• Foods and beverages being purchased globally
• Consumer testing with ageing and elderly population
• Case study
• Ageing consumer’s about their experience
4© Leatherhead Research Limited 2015 www.leatherheadfood.com
Product launches
136
71
95100
150
54
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Global no. of NPLs with "elderly" (55+) positioning
Source: Mintel GNPD
5© Leatherhead Research Limited 2015 www.leatherheadfood.com
Source: Mintel GNPD
Product launches by country
286
204
2717
9 8 6 5 4 3
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
"Elderly" NPLs from 2010-2015(Top 10 by Country)
6© Leatherhead Research Limited 2015 www.leatherheadfood.com
Source: Mintel GNPD
Product launches per category
155
117
6863
48
26 2518 18 17
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
"Elderly" NPLs from 2010-2015(Top 10 by Category)
7© Leatherhead Research Limited 2015 www.leatherheadfood.com
US data on supplements for “elderly”
Joint health positioning
16% of NPLs
in 2014
UP 11% from 2013
Collagen inclusion
3% of NPLs
in 2014
UP 19% from 2013
Brain health9% of NPLs
in 2014UP 22%
from 2013
Sarcopeniaprevention
related positioning
56% increase in NPLs
from 2013 to 2014
Products containing
luthein
37% increase in NPLs
from 2013 to 2014
Products containing zeaxhantin
56% increase in NPLs
from 2013 to 2014
Source: World Health Organisation
8© Leatherhead Research Limited 2015 www.leatherheadfood.com
The Human Senses
Vision
Taste
Smell
Hearing
Touch
9© Leatherhead Research Limited 2015 www.leatherheadfood.com
Real people
• For most valid results test with real
people
• Smaller consumer groups
• Qualitative testing
• Multiple sessions
• 1:1 interviews
• Reduce bias
• Training?
• Replicating 1 sample
10© Leatherhead Research Limited 2015 www.leatherheadfood.com
Methods
• Liking scales
• 9 point scale
• School scale
• Focus groups
• Sorting tasks
• Free sorting
• Observation techniques
Source: Lisa Methven,
University of Reading
11© Leatherhead Research Limited 2015 www.leatherheadfood.com
Marketing claims
• From Health to Sensory Claims
• Consumer engagement
• ASTM E1958-12
12© Leatherhead Research Limited 2015 www.leatherheadfood.com
Product usage
• Home trials
• Measuring and minimising product waste
• Wider product feedback
• Product preparation, ease of use pack, storage etc.
• Understanding deviations from intended use
• More real life
13© Leatherhead Research Limited 2015 www.leatherheadfood.com
Product experience
• Product and pack
• Setting/context
• Sensory
• Labels and contents
• Small focus groups discussing
all aspects of product
experience
14© Leatherhead Research Limited 2015 www.leatherheadfood.com
Repeat consumption - elderly
14
• Sensory panel tasted 8
consecutive 5 ml shots of
ONS
• Scored 5 attributes after
each shot, and twice
between shots as after
effects
• Sweetness perception
maintained over time.
• Metallic and Mouthdrying
Perception build with time
Methven L, et al (2010) Food Quality and Preference 21:948-955
Effect of Repeat Consumption of Oral Nutritional Supplements: Sequential
Profiling by Sensory panel
15© Leatherhead Research Limited 2015 www.leatherheadfood.com
Liking vs wanting
Familiarity increased…
…but liking did not!
Source: Lisa Methven
However, consumption of msg
soups increased!
16© Leatherhead Research Limited 2015 www.leatherheadfood.com
Case Study
Sensory attributes and preference of low-volume oral nutritional
supplements (ONS)
• Good compliance is vital
• Sensory attributes influence compliance
C.M.Fry1, A.L.Cawood1, A.Ashouri2
1Medical Affairs, Nutricia Ltd, Trowbridge, UK, 2Leatherhead Food Research, Leatherhead, Surrey, UK
17© Leatherhead Research Limited 2015 www.leatherheadfood.com
Case Study
*P<0.05, significantly higher score
compared with Product B
**P<0.05, significantly higher
score compared with Products B
and C
Figure 1: Comparison of mean sensory
attribute scores between products† (mean
± SD)
*
**
**
**
5.00
6.00
7.00
A B C
Mean Score
Product
55
60
65
70
75
A B C
%
Product
Figure 2: Percentage of participants who felt that the
thickness of the products† was “just right”
Results show variations in the
perception of sensory attributes of
different energy-dense, low-volume
ONS which appear to influence overall
preference
18© Leatherhead Research Limited 2015 www.leatherheadfood.com
Consumer survey
22%
78%
Gender
Male Female
3%
33%
29%
28%
7%
0%
Age
40 41-50 51-60 61-70 71-80 81+
N=585
Source: Leatherhead Food Research
19© Leatherhead Research Limited 2015 www.leatherheadfood.com
Difficult opening packaging
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Bread
Other
Soda bottles
Milk
Biscuit packs
Fruit nets
Juice cartons
Sliced cheese/meat
Films/cardboard
Cans/tins
Jars
Difficult to open packaging
40 41-50 51-60 61-70 71-80 81+
N=585
Source: Leatherhead Food Research
20© Leatherhead Research Limited 2015 www.leatherheadfood.com
Purchasing healthy ingredients
0 50 100 150 200 250
Sarcopenia
Resveratrol
Other
CoQ10
Lutein
Collagen
Protein enriched
Glucosamine
Anti-oxidants
Superfruits
Calcium
Green tea
Omega 3
None
Purchase products containing...N=585
Source: Leatherhead Food Research
21© Leatherhead Research Limited 2015 www.leatherheadfood.com
Labelling
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Other
Opening instructions difficult
None
Too much info
Instructions complicated
too little info
Ingredients easy to read
Instructions easy to read
Ingredients complicated
Use by date difficult to find
Instructions too small
Ingredients too small
Labelling
40 41-50 51-60 61-70 71-80 81+
N=585
Source: Leatherhead Food Research
22© Leatherhead Research Limited 2015 www.leatherheadfood.com
References
• ASTM E1958-12, www.astm.org
• DLG & Leatherhead (2015) Sensory Claims – Methodological approach to development
and substantiation
• Fry, C.M., Cawood, A.L., Ashouri, A., (2015). Sensory attributes and preference of low-
volume oral nutritional supplements (ONS), Pangborn Poster presentation
• Leatherhead Food Research Publication, Ageing Population (2015)
• Methven, Allen, Withers & Gosney (2012) Ageing and Taste. Proceeding of the Nutrition
Society, 71 (4): 556-65
• Methven L, et al (2010) Food Quality and Preference 21:948-955
• Withers, Methven, Qannari, Allen, Gosney, & MacFie, (2014) JSS,
doi:10.1111/joss.12093
• Withers, Gosney & Methven(2013), JSS, 28(3) 230-237
Innovation | Nutrition | Regulatory | Safety | Insight
Thank you for your time
Cindy Beeren