Formal potential analytical technique, P K MANI

30
Formal potential Pabitra Kumar Mani , Assoc. Prof., Ph.D. ACSS, BCKV

description

Formal potential analytical technique

Transcript of Formal potential analytical technique, P K MANI

Page 1: Formal potential analytical technique, P K MANI

Formal potential

Pabitra Kumar Mani , Assoc. Prof., Ph.D. ACSS, BCKV

Page 2: Formal potential analytical technique, P K MANI

Standard potentials Eo are evaluated with full regard to activity effects and with all ions present in simple form: they are really limiting or ideal values and are rarely observed in a potentiometric measurement. In practice, the solutionsmay be quite concentrated and frequently contain other electrolytes; under these conditions the activities of the pertinent species are much smaller than the concentrations, and consequently the use of the latter may lead to unreliableconclusions. Also, the actual active species present (see example below) may differ from those to which the ideal standard potentials apply. For these reasons 'formal potentials' have been proposed to supplement standard potentials

Page 3: Formal potential analytical technique, P K MANI

Formal Potential:The concept of formal potential was introduced by Swift and he defined it as the experimentally determined potential of a solution containing both the oxidised and reduced species each at a concentration of 1 formal together with other substances at a given concentration.

1F ≡ 1g formula weight per litre solution

The std. Potential or E0 (normal potential) is a limiting or ideal value assuming that the reacting species are in their simple forms. Since in practice such ideal solutions are rarely found. The term formal potential has been proposed and found to be more practical one.

2

30

FeFe

log1

0.0591-EE

Where the ionic sp. are aqueous forms

Fe+3 aq or Fe+3(H2O)6 ; Fe+2 aq or Fe+2 (H2O) simple form of Fe+3 or Fe+2

Page 4: Formal potential analytical technique, P K MANI

In IM HCl soln, however part of Fe+3 exists as various sp.like FeCl+2, FeCl2

+, FeCl4-2 (all in Feric state). Similarly Fe+2 as FeCl+, FeCl4

-2 etc.

aq2FeIIFe

aq IIIFeIIIFe0

.fC.

.fC . 0.0591log-EE

Let, α be the fraction of total Fe+3 irons, β is the fraction of total Fe+2 iron existing in simple aqueous form

E0 : normal potential i.e., std for ionic strength of the soln, where CFe

III and CFe+2 are the

molar concentration of total Fe+3 and Fe+2 iron present in the soln.,f: activity coefficient

IIFe

IIIFe

aq2Fe

aq IIIFe0

C

Clog0591.0

f

f0.0591loglog 0.0591

- -E

IIFe

IIIFe0

C

Clog0591.0

/ -E potential Formal/ E0

Page 5: Formal potential analytical technique, P K MANI

Where Fe+3 forms a more stable complex in comparison to the Fe+2 by interaction with the anions or any comlexing reagent present in the soln. The value of the ratio α/β is less than 1 and in that case the value of Formal potential becomes more +ve which means the Fe+2 behaves as stronger reducing agent. PO4

-3 is such an anion in presence of which Fe+2 is a stronger reducing agent.

Medium E0/

1M HClO4 -0.73 V

1M HCl -0.77V1M H2SO4 -0.68V

0.5 M H3PO4 + 1M H2SO4 -0.61 V

E0 : Fe+2/Fe+3 = -0.77V

E0/ Diphenyl amine = -0.76V in (0.5M H3PO4 + 1M H2SO4)

Minm 0.15 V difft of the redox potential value for making a titration accurate

Page 6: Formal potential analytical technique, P K MANI

Fe(CN)64- Fe(CN)⇋ 6

-3 + e- E0 = -0.36 V

2I- = I2 + 2e- ; E0= -0.54 Volt

I2 + 2Fe(CN)6-4 2I⇋ - +2Fe(CN)6

-3

It can be seen that I2 should normally oxidise ferrocyanide to Ferricyanide. But in 1M HCl medium or 1M H2SO4 medium

E0/ [(H2Fe(CN)6

-2 /H2Fe(CN)6-1 ] = -0.71 V α/β > 1

ferro ferri

2[Fe(CN)6] -3 + 2I- ⇋ I2 + 2Fe(CN)6

-4

Hence in 1M HCl medium Ferricyanide liberates I2 from I-. Similarly when Zn+2 is present in the soln it reacts with Ferrocyanide to form K2Zn3[Fe(CN)6]2

II III

2K+ + 3Zn+2 + [Fe(CN)6]4- → K2Zn3[Fe(CN)6]2

And so in presence of Zn+2 sufficient K+Ferricyanide liberates I2 from KI and the rn can be used for indirect iodometric determination determination of Zn+2 in soln.

II III

Page 7: Formal potential analytical technique, P K MANI

Red Ox indicators

InRed In⇋ Ox +ne-InRed and InOx must have different colours

Red

OxInIn In

Inlog

n0.0591

-EE 0

In order that indicator can be used in a redox titration the potential of the analyte soln must lies near

n0.0591

E In0

Criteria for using a redox indicator

1. The indicator potential must be intermediate between that of the analyte and titrant system

2. At eq. point redox potential of the soln should change from to with sharp detectable

colour change

3.E0In or better Eo/

In should differ by at least 0.15 V from the formal potential of the redox couple titrated

n0.0591

E In0

n0.0591

E In0

Page 8: Formal potential analytical technique, P K MANI

Classification of RedOx Indicator

(I) Metal Complexes [ MLx ]+p [ML⇋ x ]

+(p+n) + ne-

InRed InOx

Where L is a ligand, M= Metal ,

the two forms must have difft colour. e.g.[Fe-(O-pn)3]

+2 , Red colour

Ferroin Indicator

[Fe-(Opn)3]+3

pale blue less stable

As the red colour is more intense the colour change is actually observed at E0

In value of -1.12 V

E0In = -1.14 V

E0/In (1MHCl) = -1.06 V

Page 9: Formal potential analytical technique, P K MANI

Introducing various substitutes in the phenanthroline ring indicator potential value can be changed.

Thus, with 4,7 dimethyl Ferroin , which is very suitable for titration of chromate or dichromate by Fe+2 soln. (Mohr’s titrant soln) when NO2

- group is introduced RedOx potential value is more –ve -1.25V (Nitroferroin)

E0/In (1MHCl) = -0.88 V

II . Organic molecules forming a Redox Couple, Diphenyl amine (knop, 1924) in H2SO4 soln (DPA, base and insoluble in water)

Page 10: Formal potential analytical technique, P K MANI

Red-Ox potential of In (0.5-1M H2SO4 + 0.5M H3PO4 ) medium, Eo/

In = - 0.76 V

Suitable for titration of Fe+2 by dichromate soln, in presence of H3PO4 Eo/

In = - 0.61 V

Diphenylbenzidine (colorless)

Diphenylamine (colorless)

Diphenylbenzidine violet

[O]

Yellow product

Page 11: Formal potential analytical technique, P K MANI

Due to low solubility of free DPA it is replaced by its sulfonic acid derivative.

The sodium or Ba salt of which is used as indicator in the form of 0.2% aq soln. The formal potential

Eo/In = - 0.85 V

(0.5M H2SO4)

So, even without using H3PO4, DPA sulfonate indicator can be used safely in the titration of Fe+2 by dichromate.

Diphenylamine 4-sulphonic acid

The violet colour Diphenyl benzidine is oxidised further to a yellow or reddish yellow product and hence in the reverse titration of chromate or dichromate by Mohr’s salt soln, DPA is not convenient, N-methyl DPA sulfonic acid is ecellent for reverse titration

Eo/In = - 0.90 V

(0.5M H2SO4)

N-PHENYL ANTHRANILIC ACID is best for reverse titration CH3

Page 12: Formal potential analytical technique, P K MANI

Another group of Organic compounds are used as redox indicator of which “ Variamine blue” is a versatile indicator

VARIAMINE BLUE

In the pH range 1.5-6.3 it is colourless in reducing medium and blue in Oxidising medium.

Eo/In = - 0.6 V (pH= 1.5) to 0.36 V (pH =6.3)

It has been used in the titration using Ascorbic acid(Vitamin C) as titrant

BTB can be used as a Red-Ox indicator in the titration of AsIII, NH3, I

- etc. With ClO- hypochlorite soln, Deep blue (Reducing) – greenish yellow (Oxidising medium)

Page 13: Formal potential analytical technique, P K MANI

Miscellaneous

Methylene Blue EoIn = - 0.52 V

EoIn = - 0.53 V Starch/ I-

Page 14: Formal potential analytical technique, P K MANI

Permanganate titration

Oxidation with permanganate : Reduction of permanaganate

KMnO4 Powerful oxidant that the most widely used.

In strongly acidic solutions (1M H2SO4 or HCl, pH 1)

MnO4– + 8H+ + 5e = Mn2 + + 4H2 O Eo = 1.51 V

violet color colorless manganous

KMnO4 is a self-indicator.

In feebly acidic, neutral, or alkaline solutions

MnO4– + 4H+ + 3e = MnO2 (s) + 2H2 O Eo = 1.695 V

brown manganese dioxide solid

In very strongly alkaline solution (2M NaOH)

MnO4– + e = MnO4

2 – Eo = 0.558 V

green manganate

Page 15: Formal potential analytical technique, P K MANI

Standardization of KMnO4 solution

Potassium permanganate is not primary standard, because traces of MnO2 are invariably present.

Standardization by titration of sodium oxalate (primary standard) :

2KMnO4 + 5 Na2(COO)2 + 8H2SO4 = 2MnSO4 + K2SO4 + 5Na2SO4 + 10 CO2 + 8H2O

2KMnO4 5 Na2(COO)2 10 Equivalent mw 158.03 mw 134.01 158.03 g / 5 134.01 g / 2 1 Eq.

31.606 g 67.005 g

1N × 1000 ml 67.005 g

x N × V ml a g

x N = ( a g × 1N × 1000 ml) / (67.005 g × V ml)

Page 16: Formal potential analytical technique, P K MANI

Preparation of 0.1 N potassium permanganate solution

KMnO4 is not pure. Distilled water contains traces of organic reducing substances which react slowly with permanganate to form hydrous managnese dioxide. Manganesse dioxide promotes the autodecomposition of permanganate.

1) Dissolve about 3.2 g of KMnO4 (mw=158.04) in 1000ml of water,

heat the solution to boiling, and keep slightly below the boiling point for 1 hr.

Alternatively , allow the solution to stand at room temperature for 2 or 3 days.

2) Filter the liquid through a sintered-glass filter crucible to remove solid MnO2.

3) Transfer the filtrate to a clean stoppered bottle freed from grease with cleaning mixture.

4) Protect the solution from evaporation, dust, and reducing vapors, and keep it in the dark or in diffuse light. Preserve it in amber –coloured glass bottle.

5) Standardise from time to time. If in time managanese dioxide settles out, refilter the solution and restandardize it.

Page 17: Formal potential analytical technique, P K MANI
Page 18: Formal potential analytical technique, P K MANI

Applications of permanganometry

(1) H2O2

2KMnO4 + 5 H2O2 + 3H2SO4 = 2MnSO4 + K2SO4 + 5O2 + 8H2O

(2) NaNO2

2NaNO2 + H2SO4 = Na2SO4 + HNO2

2KMnO4 + 5 HNO2 + 3H2SO4 = 2MnSO4 + K2SO4 + 5HNO3 + 3H2O

(3) FeSO4

2KMnO4 + 510 FeSO4 + 8H2SO4 = 2MnSO4 + K2SO4 + 5Fe2(SO4)3 + 8H2O

(4) CaO

CaO + 2HCl = CaCl2 + H2O

CaCl2 + H2C2O4 = CaC2O4 + 2HCl (excess oxalic acid)

2KMnO4 + 5 H2C2O4 + 3H2SO4 = 2MnSO4 + K2SO4 + 10CO2 + 8H2O (back tit)

(5) Calcium gluconate

[CH2OH(CHOH)4COO]2Ca + 2HCl = CaCl + 2CH2OH9CHOH)4COOH

(NH4)2C2O4 + CaCl2 = CaC2O4 + 2 NH4Cl

CaCl2 + H2SO4 = H2C2O4 + CaSO4

2KMnO4 + 5 H2C2O4 + 3H2SO4 = 2MnSO4 + K2SO4 + 10CO2 + 8H2O

Page 19: Formal potential analytical technique, P K MANI

The concentrations of the various species must be taken into considerationespecially if combined redox and acid-base systems are involved. From thedata, taken from Table 1.17 and I.l8 for example:

one could draw the conclusion that arsenate ions will oxidize iodide:

but the reaction cannot go in the opposite direction. This in fact is true only if the solution is strongly acid (pH ~ 0). The oxidation-reduction potential ofthe arsenate-arsenite system depends on the pH:

At pH = 6 the potential of a solution containing arsenate and arsenite ions atequal concentrations decreases to +0'20 V. Under such circumstances thereforethe opposite reaction will occur:

Page 20: Formal potential analytical technique, P K MANI

Starch-Iodine complex

Starch solution(05~ 1%) is not redox indicator.

The active fraction of starch is amylose, a polymer of the sugar -D-glucose ( 1,4 bond).

The polymer exists as a coiled helix into which small molecules can fit.

In the presence of starch and I–, iodine molecules form long chains of I5– ions

that occupy the center of the amylose helix.

••••[I I I I I]– ••••[I I I I I]– ••••

Visible absorption by the I5– chain bound within the helix gives rise to the

characteristic starch-iodine color.

Page 21: Formal potential analytical technique, P K MANI

Structure of the repeating unit of the sugar amylose.

Schematic structure of the starch-iodine complex. The amylose chain forms a helix around I6 unit.

View down the starch helix, showing iodine, inside the helix.

Page 22: Formal potential analytical technique, P K MANI

• Starch is the indicator of choice for those procedures involving iodine because it forms an intense blue complex with iodine. Starch is not a redox indicator; it responds specifically to the presence of I2, not to a change in redox potential.

• The active fraction of starch is amylose, a polymer of the sugar α-d-glucose.

• In the presence of starch, iodine forms I6 chains inside the amylose helix and the color turns dark blue

Starch-Iodine Complex

Page 23: Formal potential analytical technique, P K MANI
Page 24: Formal potential analytical technique, P K MANI
Page 25: Formal potential analytical technique, P K MANI
Page 26: Formal potential analytical technique, P K MANI
Page 27: Formal potential analytical technique, P K MANI

16-7 Methods Involving Iodine

• Iodimetry: a reducing analyte is titrated directly with iodine (to produce I−).

• iodometry, an oxidizing analyte is added to excess I− to produce iodine, which is then titrated with standard thiosulfate solution.

• Iodine only dissolves slightly in water. Its solubility is enhanced by interacting with I-

• A typical 0.05 M solution of I2 for titrations is prepared by dissolving 0.12 mol of KI plus 0.05 mol of I2 in 1 L of water. When we speak of using iodine as a titrant, we almost always mean that we are using a solution of I2 plus excess I−.

Page 28: Formal potential analytical technique, P K MANI

Preparation and Standardization of Solutions

• Acidic solutions of I3- are unstable because the excess I− is

slowly oxidized by air: • In neutral solutions, oxidation is insignificant in the absence of

heat, light, and metal ions. At pH 11, triiodide ≳disproportionates to hypoiodous acid (HOI), iodate, and iodide.

• An excellent way to prepare standard I3- is to add a weighed

quantity of potassium iodate to a small excess of KI. Then add excess strong acid (giving pH ≈ 1) to produce I2 by quantitative reverse disproportionation:

Page 29: Formal potential analytical technique, P K MANI
Page 30: Formal potential analytical technique, P K MANI

[email protected]

http://www.bckv.edu.in