FOREST MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION REPORT - SGS · 2016-02-17 · FOREST MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION...

SGS QUALIFOR

(Associated Document)

Doc. Number: AD 36-A-03

Doc. Version date: 20 November 2006

Page: 1 of 53

SGS services are rendered in accordance with the applicable SGS General Conditions of Service accessible at

http://www.sgs.com/terms_and_conditions.htm

SGS South Africa (Qualifor Programme) 58 Melville Road, Booysens - PO Box 82582, Southdale 2185 South AfricaSystems and Services Certification Division [email protected] South Africa (Qualifor Programme) 58 Melville Road, Booysens - PO Box 82582, Southdale 2185 - South AfricaSystems and Services Certification Division Contact Programme Director at t. +27 11 681 -2500 www.sgs.com/forestry

FOREST MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION REPORT

SSEECCTTIIOONN AA:: PPUUBBLLIICC SSUUMMMMAARRYY

Project Nr: 7268-NZ

Client: NZ Forest Managers Ltd

Web Page: www.nzfm.co.nz

Address: PO Box 304, Turangi

Country: New Zealand

Certificate Nr. SGS-FM/COC-001016

Certificate Type: Forest Management

Date of Issue 28 July 2007

Date of expiry: 27 July 2012

Evaluation Standard SGS Generic Forest Stewardship Standard (AD33) adapted for NZ Plantations, version 03 of 20 December 2010.

Forest Zone: Temperate

Total Certified Area 48,679.3 hectares

Scope: Forest Management of plantations in the Lake Taupo and Lake Rotoaira regions of New Zealand for the production of softwood and hardwood timber.

Location of the FMUs included in the scope

Turangi

Company Contact

Person:

Mr Chas Hutton

Address: PO Box 304 Turangi

Tel: 07 386 8757

Fax 07 386 7020

Email: [email protected]

AD 36-A-03 of 53

Evaluation dates:

Main Evaluation 20 – 23 March 2007

Surveillance 1 7 – 9 April 2008

Surveillance 2 10 – 12 March 2009

Surveillance 3 20 – 22 April 2010

Surveillance 4 10 – 12 May 2011

Copyright:

© 2010 SGS South Africa (Pty) Ltd

All rights reserved

AD 36-A-03 of 53

TTAABBLLEE OOFF CCOONNTTEENNTTSS

1. SCOPE OF CERTIFICATE .................................................................................................................... 6

2. COMPANY BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................ 10

2.1 Ownership ..................................................................................................................................................10

2.2 Company Key Objectives ............................................................................................................................10

2.3 Company History ........................................................................................................................................11

2.4 Organisational Structure .............................................................................................................................11

2.5 Ownership and Use Rights ..........................................................................................................................11

2.6 Other Land Uses .........................................................................................................................................12

2.7 Non-certified Forests ...................................................................................................................................12

3. FOREST MANAGEMENT SYSTEM .................................................................................................... 12

3.1 Bio-physical setting .....................................................................................................................................12

3.2 History of use ..............................................................................................................................................13

3.3 Planning process ........................................................................................................................................14

3.4 Harvest and regeneration ............................................................................................................................17

3.5 Monitoring processes ..................................................................................................................................18

4. SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTEXT ................................................................... 20

4.1 Social aspects .............................................................................................................................................20

4.2 Environmental aspects ................................................................................................................................21

4.3 Administration, Legislation and Guidelines ..................................................................................................21

5. CHANGES IN MANAGEMENT, HARVESTING, SILVICULTURE AND MONITORING ....................... 22

6. PREPARATION FOR THE EVALUATION ........................................................................................... 23

6.1 Schedule .....................................................................................................................................................23

6.2 Team ..........................................................................................................................................................23

6.3 Checklist Preparation ..................................................................................................................................23

6.4 Stakeholder notification ...............................................................................................................................24

7. THE EVALUATION .............................................................................................................................. 24

AD 36-A-03 of 53

7.1 Opening meeting .........................................................................................................................................24

7.2 Document review ........................................................................................................................................24

7.3 Sampling and Evaluation Approach .............................................................................................................24

7.4 Field assessments ......................................................................................................................................24

7.5 Stakeholder interviews ................................................................................................................................25

7.6 Summing up and closing meeting ...............................................................................................................25

8. EVALUATION RESULTS .................................................................................................................... 25

8.1 Findings related to the general QUALIFOR Programme...............................................................................26

PRINCIPLE 1: Compliance with law and FSC Principles................................................................................26

PRINCIPLE 2: Tenure and use rights and responsibilities ..............................................................................27

PRINCIPLE 3: Indigenous peoples’ rights ......................................................................................................27

PRINCIPLE 4: Community relations and workers rights .................................................................................28

PRINCIPLE 5: Benefits from the forest .........................................................................................................29

PRINCIPLE 6: Environmental impact ...........................................................................................................30

PRINCIPLE 7: Management plan ..................................................................................................................32

PRINCIPLE 8: Monitoring and evaluation ......................................................................................................33

PRINCIPLE 9: High Conservation Value Forests ...........................................................................................34

PRINCIPLE 10: Plantations.............................................................................................................................35

9. CERTIFICATION DECISION ............................................................................................................... 37

10. MAINTENANCE OF CERTIFICATION ................................................................................................. 37

11. RECORD OF CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUESTS (CARs) ................................................................ 40

12. RECORD OF OBSERVATIONS .......................................................................................................... 42

13. RECORD OF STAKEHOLDER COMMENTS AND INTERVIEWS ....................................................... 45

14. RECORD OF COMPLAINTS ............................................................................................................... 53

ASSOCIATED DOCUMENTS (not part of the Public Summary)

AD 20: Evaluation Itinerary

AD 21: Attendance Record

AD 26: Corrective Action Requests

AD 36-B: Evaluation - Observations and Information on Logistics

AD 36-A-03 of 53

Complaints and Disputes

Procedures for submitting complaints, appeals and disputes, and the SGS processing of such are published on www.sgs.com/forestry. This information is also available on request – refer contact details on the first page.

AD 36-A-03 of 53

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of the evaluation was to evaluate the operations of NZ Forest Managers Ltd against the requirements of the QUALIFOR Programme, the SGS Group’s forest certification programme accredited by Forest Stewardship Council.

1. SCOPE OF CERTIFICATE

The scope of the certificate falls within the Temperate Forest Zone and includes 2 Forest Management Units (FMUs) (Crown Forestry, Lake Taupo Forest Trust and Lake Rotoaira Forest Trust forests) as described below.

Description of FMUs:

Description Ownership Area (ha) Longitude E/W Latitude N/S

Lake Taupo Forest Lake Taupo Forest Trust / Crown Forestry

30,802.7 176º 05.7’ 38º 56.9’

Lake Taupo Crown Enclave Crown Forestry 739.0 175º 59.1’ 38º 58.9’

Rotoaira Forest Rotoaira Forest Trust / Crown Forestry

15,926.4 175º 36.9’ 38º 59.9’

Rotoaira Crown Enclave Crown Forestry 57.0 175º 39.9’ 39º 03.7’

Te Rangiita Lake Taupo Forest Trust

842.70 175º 52.4’ 38º 56.3’

Te Whenua 1 Lake Taupo Forest Trust

94.30 175º 54.3’ 39º 02.2’

Te Whakao Lake Taupo Forest Trust

847.2 176º 05.7’ 38º 56.9’

Size of FMUs:

Nr of FMUs Area (ha)

Less than 100ha 0

100 to 1000 ha in area 0

1001 to 10000 ha in area 0

More than 10000 ha in area 2 48,679.3

Total 2 48,679.3

Total Area in the Scope of the Certificate that is:

Area (ha)

Privately managed 48,679.3

State Managed

AD 36-A-03 of 53

Total Area in the Scope of the Certificate that is:

Area (ha)

Community Managed

Composition of the Certified Forest(s)

Area (ha)

Area of forest protected from commercial harvesting of timber and managed primarily for conservation objectives

15,170.1

Area of forest protected from commercial harvesting of timber and managed primarily for production of NTFPs or services

Area of forest classified as “high conservation value forest”

Total area of production forest (i.e. forest from which timber may be harvested)

Area of production forest classified as “plantation” 33,509.2

Area of production forest regenerated primarily by replanting

Area of production forest regenerate primarily by natural regeneration

List of High Conservation Values

Description Notes

List of Timber Product Categories

Product Class Product Type Trade Name Category Species

Wood in the rough

Logs of coniferous wood

Saw logs

Pulp logs

Conifer

Pinus radiata

Pseudotsuga menzesii

Pinus radiata

Wood in the rough

Logs of non-coniferous wood

Pulp logs Non-Deciduous (Hardwood)

Eucalyptus delegatensis

Annual Timber Production

Species (botanical name) Species (common name) Area (ha) Maximum Annual Sustainable Yield (m3)

YE March 2007

Projected Actual

Pinus radiata Radiata pine 33,015.2 660,000 660,000

Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas fir 329 3,000 3,000

Eucalyptus delegatensis Eucalyptus sp. 55.5 8,000 8,000

Other species 109.5

AD 36-A-03 of 53



YE March 2007

Projected Actual

Totals 33,509.2



YE March 2008

Projected Actual


Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas fir 329 3,000 3,000

Eucalyptus delegatensis Eucalyptus sp. 55.5 8,000 8,000

Totals



YE March 2009

Projected Actual

Pinus radiata Radiata pine 693,000 688,000

Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas fir 3,000 3,000

Eucalyptus delegatensis Eucalyptus sp. 8,000 8,000

Other species

Totals



YE June 2009

Projected Actual

Pinus radiata Radiata pine 695,000 721,000

Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas fir 0 200

Eucalyptus delegatensis Eucalyptus sp. 0 2,800

Other species

Totals



YE 30 April 2011

AD 36-A-03 of 53

Projected Actual


Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas fir 329 0 60

Eucalyptus delegatensis Eucalyptus sp. 55.5 0 2,020

Other species 109.5 0 0

Totals 33,509.2 698,000 700,750

List of Timber Product Categories

Product Notes

Logs Stems are processed into various log grades and these logs are transported from the forests to customers.

Residues – such as firewood Firewood is supplied to a central firewood yard from cutover areas. Firewood is only available to beneficial owners of the forests.

Totals

Approximate Annual Commercial Production of Non-Timber-Forest-Products

Product Species Unit of measure Total units

Botanical Name Common Name)

n/a

Lists of Pesticides

Product Name Quantity Used Area of application

MA SA1 SA2 SA3

SA4 MA SA1 SA2 SA3 SA4

Agpro Green Glysophate 510

9,260 lt 1,550

Meturon 521.2 lt 1,550

Agpro Terbuthylazine 500 23,987 lt

1,283

AG Copp 75 1,412. kg

1,284.1

Agpro Valzine 500 2,982 lt 383

Sodium Monofluoroacetate (1080)

34,374 kg

11,458

Potassium cyanide 0.578 kg

578

AD 36-A-03 of 53

2. COMPANY BACKGROUND

2.1 Ownership

Lake Taupo & Rotoaira Forests were established following the signing of lease agreements between Maori owners of the land and the Crown in 1969 (Lake Taupo) and 1973 (Rotoaira). These lease agreements contain detailed lessor and lessee rights and obligations. They provide the right for the Crown to establish and manage forests in return for payment of stumpage share returns to the landowners. Maori landowners of the Lake Taupo Forest are represented by the Lake Taupo Forest Trust (LTFT), and owners of the Rotoaira Forest Land are represented by the Lake Rotoaira Forest Trust (LRFT). As a result of negotiations between the Crown and forest trusts, the forest leases were varied so that the forest area is now being handed back to the lessors as it is harvested.

The Crown Enclaves are relatively small areas of forests established on Crown owned land that adjoin Lake Taupo Forest (7 areas) and Rotoaira Forest (one area) and are logically managed in conjunction with these larger forests.

Te Rangiita Forest is established on Maori land leased by the LTFT, whilst Te Whenua 1 is on freehold land owned by the LTFT.

NZFM is contracted to Crown Forestry for the management of the areas of Lake Taupo and Rotoaira Forests that the Crown owns, and for the Crown Enclaves. NZFM is also contracted by the Lake Taupo Forest Trust and the Lake Rotoaira Forest Trust for the management of the areas of Lake Taupo and Rotoaira Forests handed back by the Crown into full Trust ownership, and for Te Rangiita and Te Whenua 1 Forests.

Co-ordination of management over the mosaic of CF / LTFT / LRFT ownership within Lake Taupo Forest is undertaken by the Forest Management Advisory Committee (FORMAC) which includes representatives from MAF (Crown Forestry), the Trusts & NZFM. This committee deals with joint management issues.

2.2 Company Key Objectives

Objective Notes

Commercial

To manage and/or develop forestland for the benefit of the owners and their beneficiaries, ensuring forest utilisation for the maximum practicable financial yield, consistent with forestry practices that ensure sustainable forest management.

Social

To ensure forest management operations do not adversely affect Waahi Tapu, historic, and other sites of cultural significance.

Environmental

To manage forests in such a way as to minimise effects on the fish and wildlife habitats, and other natural resources of the forests; in particular to prevent soil erosion and discharge of sediment into Lakes Taupo and Rotoaira, and into the streams, rivers and canals flowing into the lakes.

To ensure designated forest or natural vegetation areas will be provided and maintained where these areas are necessary to prevent accelerated erosion and to protect areas of natural beauty and unique vegetation.

AD 36-A-03 of 53

Objective Notes

To manage forest operations using materials and techniques that:

• Prevent application of agrichemicals to non-target areas

• Reduce and ultimately phase-out of the most toxic / persistent /

bio-accumulating chemicals

• Minimise the discharge of contaminants to the environment

2.3 Company History

New Zealand Forest Managers Ltd (NZFM), is a privately owned company established in 1989. The company is a specialised contract forest management organisation that provides commercial forest owners with a comprehensive management service covering the full range of operations from forest development, protection and investment through to harvesting and marketing. All management functions are co-ordinated from the company office located in Turangi, 55 km south of Taupo.

2.4 Organisational Structure

NZ Forest Managers employs 23 staff. There are also 30 contractors employed by the company with a total of approximately 330 employees.

2.5 Ownership and Use Rights

The Lake Taupo Forest Trust, Lake Rotoaira Forest Trust and Beneficial Owners of the Trusts

Subject to reasonable forest management requirements of the Crown and a permit, the beneficial owners are entitled to access the lease lands to preserve and safeguard the graves of the Maori people and to fish and hunt.

General public access to Kaimanawa Forest Park

The general public have public access on Kiko Road from State Highway 1 to Kaimanawa Forest Park. This road can be closed in the event of high fire danger or to meet health and safety obligations.

Fishing Access

20.12m access strips from Lake Taupo to the source apply to the Waiotaka, Waimarino, Waipehi and Waitahanui Rivers for the purpose of fishing access for licenced fishermen on foot. Similar access strips apply to the Hinemaiaia and Tauranga-Taupo Rivers from the Lake to a point 4.9km upstream.

TrustPower Ltd

TrustPower Ltd managed three hydro-electric schemes on the Hinemaiaia River. The dams and adjacent land are excluded from the forest area but access to the sites is by way of an access licence.

Power Company Access (for maintenance)

There are three companies with lines within Lake Taupo and Rotoaira Forests. Under the 1992 Electricity Act, all three companies have access to the lines for the purpose of maintenance.

AD 36-A-03 of 53

2.6 Other Land Uses

Bee-keeping / honey collection occurs within the forests by outside parties.

The only other non-forestry activities being undertaken within Lake Taupo and Rotoaira Forests are hunting and cultural activities of beneficial owners and fishing, as outlined above. In general, there are no distinct or limited areas for these activities; they may be undertaken throughout the entire forest in all land use types.

2.7 Non-certified Forests

NZFM manages approximately 30,000 hectares of plantation forest area in 16 different forests that are not currently FSC certified. These forests are not certified at the discretion of their owners. NZFM manages all forests it is contracted to manage to the requirements of the ‘NZFM Environmental Management System’. There is no distinction between forest management operations in certified or non-certified forests, however there are management procedures or operations that are unique to Lake Taupo and Rotoaira Forests due to their certification status. Some operations are performed to a higher level in Lake Taupo and Rotoaira Forests because of their certification status, such as the comprehensive management of indigenous areas.

3. FOREST MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

3.1 Bio-physical setting

Geography:

Lake Taupo and Rotoaira Forests are geographically close, separated by 5-10 km at their closest point. Te Rangiita and Te Whenua 1 are contiguous with southern areas of Lake Taupo Forest. The Crown Enclaves are also contiguous with their respective forests.

Catchments in Lake Taupo Forest drain into Lake Taupo. Much of Rotoaira forest also drains into Lake Taupo, either directly via the Tongariro River, or via Lake Rotoaira. Some western areas of Lake Rotoaira Forest drain into the headwaters of the Wanganui River.

Forest Location Topography Geology / soils Altitude (m)

Ave Annual Rainfall (mm)

Lake Taupo

Te Rangiita

Te Whenua 1

5 km east

of

Turangi,

to 10 km

south of

Taupo.

Mainly gently

sloping, with steeper

slopes toward the

Kaimanawa Forest

Park. Some

waterways have

formed deep gorges

Mainly influenced by Taupo

volcanic centre. A variety of

pumice, ash and breccia

layers form a mantle over

Ignimbrite. Yellow brown

pumice soils cover most of the

forest area.

360 -

700

1210

AD 36-A-03 of 53

Lake Rotoaira 5 km

south of

Turangi

Mainly flat to

undulating but with

steep slopes on the

flanks of various

summits.

Geology is dominated by

outflows from the volcanic

cones of Tongariro,

Ngauruhoe, Kakaramea and

Pihanga. Soils are derived

from andesitic Ngauruhoe ash

on Taupo pumice.

580 –

1300

(highest

planting

850 m)

1568

Ecology:

Vegetation prior to exotic forestry development was largely fire-induced associations of bracken, manuka and kanuka with monoao and tussock on the harsher sites. Shrub hardwood species such as five-finger were beginning to emerge in those areas which had escaped frequent burning.

Limited areas of high forest in the Opawa region and along the eastern boundary were mainly cutover in the 1940’s and 1950’s. Toitoi, wineberry and other aggressive pioneering species are now present in these areas.

The forest backs onto the Kaimanawa Forest Park which is dominated by beech forest. Fingers of this forest are present in gorges running into the lease area where past fires have not penetrated.

As well as the native species mentioned above, most of the common introduced weeds (broom, gorse, blackberry, buddleia and Himalayan honeysuckle) are present in the forest.

Soils:

Both forests are established on volcanic soils derived from the various eruptions of Taupo and Tongariro. Lake Taupo Forest forms a relatively continuous cover from the natural forests of the Kaimanawa Forest Park, on the slopes of the Kaimanawa Range, to the eastern shores of Lake Taupo. Rotoaira Forest is established as a network of forest blocks between the slope of Mt Tongariro and the southern end of Lake Taupo.

3.2 History of use

National history of use

At the time of arrival of Maori in New Zealand, possibly 1,000 years ago, the country was three quarters covered in forest. Over the subsequent period, one third was cleared by fire, either deliberate or accidental. The arrival of Europeans n New Zealand, approximately 150 years ago, was followed by the rapid removal of half the remaining forest cover through land clearance for agriculture and settlement, and unsustainable logging. It is estimated that of the forests removed by European settlers, probably less than 10% was utilised, the rest being burnt.

By the late 1800s there was concern developing in parts of the country about the future wood supply. This led to some establishment of small areas of plantations in the early 1900s. Increased concern over dwindling forest resources and the establishment of a government Forest Service in 1919 contributed to a boom in planting of exotic species up to around 1935. By this stage about 125,000 ha of plantations were present. Since this time, two major planting booms have occurred in the 1970s and in the mid 1990s. This has resulted in the establishment of a total plantation forest area of 1.68 million ha. This resource is dominated by radiata pine (90.5%) with significant areas of Douglas fir

AD 36-A-03 of 53

(4.8%)1.

In the early 1980s approximately half the exotic plantation forests were owned by the state through the NZ Forest Service. However in 1987, the NZ Forest Service was abolished, and subsequently moves made to sell long term cutting rights to the state forests. There are now only small areas of plantation forest in government ownership, with the majority of the resource privately owned. Ownership structure is relatively diverse and includes major off-shore ownership.

Regional history of forest use

Maori first settled the area around 800-1000 years ago from the Te Arawa canoe which landed at Maketu. The Ngati Tuwharetoa Rohe (tribal territory) centres on Lake Taupo and extends around 50-70 km in all directions from the lake shore. Ngati Tuwharetoa have a strong tribal organisation which is centred around the tradition of a Paramount Chief. They have maintained control of large areas of their lands. Current Ngati Tuwharetoa lands amount to 205,963 hectares. In addition Ngati Tuwharetoa have ownership of the lake beds of Lake Taupo (61,453 ha) and Lake Rotoaira (1,540 ha).

Ngati Tuwharetoa have provided major gifts of land to the nation. Particularly significant is the gifting of the Tongariro National Park in 1886. Other lands that Ngati Tuwharetoa have contributed to the national conservation estate include wetlands at Tokaanu and the Pihanga Scenic Reserve (now part of Tongariro National Park).

The first European settlers arrived in the area around the mid 1800s Clearance of land for farming became important, both on European owned land and also Ngati Tuwharetoa land. Logging of natural forests was also important particularly during the mid 1900s.

Clearance and frequent fires along the eastern shores of Lake Taupo meant that by the 1960s there was considerable concern over the degraded nature of lands on the east of the lake and erosion occurring in these areas.

During the 1960s meetings were held by the Maori owners of the various blocks of land in the current area of Lake Taupo Forest. It was agreed in principle that afforestation should be undertaken to provide a productive use of the land and protect the values of Lake Taupo.

In 1969 the landowners agreed to lease the land to the Crown for afforestation. This lease had a 70 year term and involved the crown undertaking forest establishment and management and providing a share of the final stumpage to the owners.

Establishment of Lake Taupo Forest took place between 1969 and 1986, and Rotoaira Forest was established between 1973 and 1989. Variations to both leases were agreed in 2000 (Lake Taupo Forest) and 2002 (Rotoaira Forest) which allow for the Trusts to progressively resume ownership of the forest.

3.3 Planning process

Documents and systems that form the planning process are as follows:

Leases: The leases provide the overall objectives and requirements for forest establishment and management. The leases set out various obligations of the Crown as the lessee and of the Trusts as the lessor. These documents also require the Crown to prepare management plans, revise these at five yearly intervals, and make annual reports available to the Trust. Consultation with the trust over these management plans is required.

AD 36-A-03 of 53

Management Plans for each forest: Plans for all the certified forests are prepared by Crown Forestry and the forest trusts and are held at the NZFM office. These plans set out summarised background on the forest resource, they provide the objectives of management, plans for forest establishment and tending, protection, harvesting, and marketing etc.

Cut plan: A tactical cut plan identifying a sequence of harvest in the forest is prepared. This gives an indicative sequence of harvest to 5 years out, but provides more detail of the sequence of harvest over the next 2 years. Broader strategic woodflow planning for the next 20-30 years is also undertaken.

Budgets: Budgets are prepared giving physical and financial targets by year. These are prepared in detail for the coming year, and at a more indicative level for the following 3 years.

Operational plans & documents: Various operational plans and documents provide more detailed information and planning at an operational level. These include:

1. Engineering / harvest plans identifying harvesting systems and roading for harvest areas.

2. Natural Values Management Plan.

3. Geographic Information System.

4. Stand Records System.

5. Environmental standards and assessment checklists.

There are other key planning documents that operate within the different parties that play an important part in planning and management.

NZFM Environmental Management System: This sets the basis for environmental management within NZFM. It identifies environmental policies and objectives, and sets responsibilities and procedures for managing environmental and social effects of the business. It includes operational checklists identifying the required performance at an individual operation level and allowing operational monitoring against these requirements.

The NZFM environmental policy states:

New Zealand Forest Managers is committed to sustainable forest management. The company will

work with its business partners and other stakeholders to achieve continual improvement in

environmental performance.

NZFM will:

1. Recognise the environmental requirements in management contracts, resource consents and in the Principles for Commercial Plantation Forest Management in New Zealand.

2. Ensure that environmental management and performance is consistent with the Principles and Criteria of the Forest Stewardship Council.

AD 36-A-03 of 53

3. Ensure contractors and employees are committed to the company’s environmental policy.

4. Continually review opportunities for further environmental improvements.

5. Work in partnership with other business organisations, the Government and interest groups where opportunities exist to benefit both our business and the environment.

6. Ensure this sustainable forest management commitment is integrated with other key business objectives of financial performance, operating efficiency, customer satisfaction, health and safety, and good corporate citizenship.

Crown Forestry Quality Management System: This system operated by CF sets out procedures for their management of leases and overseeing of contract forest managers. It includes detailed requirements for monitoring of operational and financial performance of management operations. This includes physical checks of operations and contractor payments of a sample of operations by CF staff.

Lake Taupo Forest Trust Draft Environmental Plan: This plan sets out the values and origins of the Trust. It identifies environmental issues, policies and objectives covering forestry and also other areas such as Whenua (land) and Wai Maori (water quality). The Trust’s mission, identified within the plan, is:

To enhance the cultural, spiritual and economic well-being of the owners and beneficiaries of the Lake Taupo Forests through the protection and sustainable management of the Lake Taupo Forests and its natural environment.

To strive for optimal and sustainable asset growth and financial returns through development of the Trust assets to assist the long term social, cultural and economic development of the beneficial owners.

Organisational structure – Responsibilities of the parties to forest management

NZ Forest Managers: Are the contract manager for the forest estate through contracts with the Crown, the Lake Taupo Forest Trust and the Lake Rotoaira Forest Trust. NZFM implement management plans developed in conjunction with these client organisations. NZFM have all responsibilities related to day to day management of the forests.

Crown Forestry: Are forest owner over some of the forest area, excluding those areas handed back to LTFT/LRFT, and Te Rangiita and Te Whenua 1 Forests. CF oversees management by their contract manager NZFM, and monitors the implementation of the management plan.

Lake Taupo Forest Trust: Agree to management plan, oversee issues related to access. See that rights of lessors in relation to leases are met. Operate on behalf of the beneficial owners and ensure communication etc with these groups. For areas of LTF in their direct ownership, LTFT oversee management by their contract manager NZFM, and monitor the implementation of the management plan.

Lake Rotoaira Forest Trust: Agree to management plan, oversee issues related to access. See that rights of lessors in relation to leases are met. Operate on behalf of the beneficial owners and ensure communication etc with these groups. For areas of LRF in their direct ownership, LRFT oversee management by their contract manager NZFM, and monitor the implementation of the management plan.

AD 36-A-03 of 53

Forest Management Advisory Committee (FORMAC): With the matrix of ownership now present within the forests as harvested forest areas are handed back to the Trusts, FORMAC plays an increasingly important role. This committee has representatives of LTFT, LRFT, CF and NZFM. It deals with important matters that relate to management of the whole forest such as forest protection, roading, and general coordination of forest operations and management.

3.4 Harvest and regeneration

Establishment / regeneration

Clearcut stands are re-established by planting. Where heavy concentrations of slash make planting difficult, this is dispersed by slash raking with an excavator or roller crushing to break the material up. Mechanical land preparation methods (roller crushing and heaping of slash) are carried out when this is required to facilitate planting operations.

Sites are assessed on an individual basis - in line with an integrated pest management strategy for the need to carry out pre-plant weed control operations.

Planting is carried out by hand using a stocking (in the case of radiata pine) of between 800 and 1,000 stems/ha, depending on site fertility.

Sites are again assessed on an individual basis - in line with an integrated pest management strategy – for the need to carry out post-planting weed control operations (releasing).

Maintenance and improvement

Silviculture of the radiata pine stands in these forests involves intensive tending to produce pruned butt logs that provide clearwood. Radiata pine is planted at an initial stocking of between 800 & 1000 stems / hectare (SPH). It is then generally pruned in three pruning lifts to a height of 6.5m between age 5 and age 10. Some better stands also receive a fourth pruning lift to 8.4m. Stands are generally thinned to waste to this final stocking in two operations, following the first pruning and following the final pruning.

The forests have some areas that are slightly to moderately deficient in some nutrients including boron, magnesium, nitrogen and phosphorous. Foliar sampling is undertaken to examine any deficiencies and applications of small amounts of nutrients such as boron are occasionally undertaken.

Silviculture is based on a long history of research in New Zealand, which has included the development of computer growth models allowing modelling of the growth and yield impacts of different tending regimes. Crown Forestry is involved in current research into silviculture and site management through membership of industry wide research co-operatives. Lake Taupo Forest Trust is also involved in research cooperatives (now Future Forests Research).

Inventory and Yield Prediction

Mid-rotation and pre-harvest inventories of forests are undertaken on all stands within the forests. The yield from each stand is predicted prior to harvesting and this is used in the preparation of rates for

AD 36-A-03 of 53

harvesting crews.

Harvesting

The current marketing strategy for the forest estate involves supplying logs to a range of domestic customers (20 at present) located from Upper Hutt to Thames and a smaller number of export customers (principally Japanese and Korean). The present harvest from the forest estate is 660,000m

3 per annum which is close to the long-term sustainable harvest level.

At present, between 8-10 contract harvest crews operate within the estate. The forests have predominantly flat to rolling terrain, which allows ground based harvesting systems. A variety of combinations of skidder, tractor, and excavator (shovel) machines are used for stem extraction. Some areas of the forests are too steep for ground based machines and cable haulers are used for stem extraction to the landing. Tracked excavators are also utilised on the cutover to extract wood by “shovel logging” in some situations. All crews source their labour from the Taupo and Turangi areas and a majority of personnel are either beneficial owners or are of Tuwharetoa descent.

Stems are then delimbed and cut into log lengths motor manually. Log making from stems is undertaken using the “Timbertech” tool, a hand held computer tool that records stem size and quality information and makes decisions on the optimal mix of log grades and lengths to be cut from each stem. Log volumes (by grade) that have been cut are downloaded from these machines each day, and any alterations to cutting lists and priorities made. Log handling and loading is undertaken with rubber tyred front-end loaders.

Clearfelling occurs at an average age of between around 27 and 35, depending on management of

woodflows to maintain an even yield from the forests. Source: NZ Forest Managers stand records.

3.5 Monitoring processes

Area by Age class - NZFM FSC Certified Forests

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40

Age (years)

Are

a (

hect

are

s)

P.RAD PSMEN EUDEL

AD 36-A-03 of 53

A variety of monitoring at both an operational and research level is undertaken. This includes:

Operational: NZFM have a process of issuing an Environmental Standards & Assessment form at the start of operations for operations with potentially significant environmental effects. This sets the required standard of performance, in conjunction with the prescription. Monitoring is then formally undertaken against these requirements on completion of the job, and performance scored.

Contractor reviews: Performance of individual contractors in relation to meeting operational and health and safety requirements is monitored and reported back to the contractor. Monthly and quarterly reviews of contractor performance are undertaken.

Environmental Management System (EMS): Internal audits of the operation of the recently developed EMS are undertaken. Information from these audits is used in the six monthly management review.

Financial: Performance against the annual budgets is intensively monitored and reported at regular management meetings.

Silviculture quality control: Measurement plots are established to sample performance of silvicultural operations such as planting, pruning and thinning. Compliance with required performance in relation to stocking, quality and other parameters is assessed.

Aerial spray operations: Monitoring is undertaken on the ground throughout any aerial spraying operations. This includes monitoring of variables such as wind speed, direction, relative humidity and temperature to ensure operations are only undertaken in satisfactory conditions.

Inventory: Mid-rotation and pre-harvest inventories of forests are undertaken.

Harvest uplift: Uplift of logs from the forest is monitored from log docket and weighbridge records using a computer database to track and reconcile load dockets.

Forest Nutrition: Foliar sampling is undertaken as a standard practice in all recently established stands and where possible signs of deficiency are identified.

Forest Health: Annual monitoring of forest health by external assessors is completed for both plantation and indigenous forest areas.

Health and safety: NZFM staff undertake three-monthly audits of contractor health and safety compliance.

Training: Contractor training levels are monitored and training services for contractors and their employees are provided by NZFM.

Plant and animal pests: Monitoring of possums is undertaken in relation to Animal Health Board possum control operations. Additionally hare and rabbit populations are monitored in areas of new plantings. Monitoring of weeds present along any roads within the forests is undertaken.

Water quality: NZFM are undertaking monitoring of water quality in the Waimarino and Mangakowhitiwhiti catchments in Lake Taupo Forest.

Recreational use: Monitoring of permit issues for access to the forest by beneficial owners is undertaken annually as part of the Environmental Monitoring Summary. This shows the number of

AD 36-A-03 of 53

permits issued and for what uses.

Rare & Threatened species: Monitoring of rare and threatened species has been carried out through surveys of key natural areas within the estate. Species surveys have also been completed for kiwi, bats, lizards and blue duck. NZFM is also involved with supporting a research study of the NZ Falcon with plantation forests in the Central North Island.

Soils: Crown Forestry participate in an industry wide research co-operative that has established a network of site quality plots to monitor the effects of forest operations on soil quality, plant production and other sustainability indicators.

Involvement in industry-wide monitoring and research: There is involvement in industry wide research and monitoring through participation of Crown Forestry in industry research co-operatives run by Forest Research Ltd. Research co-operatives establish and maintain a wide range of trials monitoring forests and management impacts around NZ. Lake Taupo Forest Trust is also involved in research cooperatives (now Future Forests Research).

External agencies: Regulatory agencies such as the Department of Labour and local authorities like Environment Waikato undertake regular inspections of the forest estate.

Annual Workforce Survey: NZFM undertakes a survey of the workforce annually and tracks trends overtime.

4. SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTEXT

4.1 Social aspects

Male Female

Number of own workers 16 7

Number of contract workers 323 7

Minimum daily wage for agricultural/forestry workers Minimum wage NZD $13.00/hr

No separate data for forest workers. Most are

contractors.

Infant mortality rates (under 5 years) 4.8/1000 live births

(NZ figure for 2006)

Proportion of workers employed from the local population (%) 86%

The Taupo district contains expansive areas of exotic pine forests and farmlands as the predominant land uses. There is also a large amount of indigenous forest including parts of the Tongariro National Park, the Kaimanawa Ranges and the Central Plateau mountains. The district’s major resources are forestry, agriculture, hydroelectric and geothermal energy, tourism and scenic and recreational attractions. The 2001 Census data shows that approximately 10% of people employed in the district work within the agriculture, forestry and fishing industries.

AD 36-A-03 of 53

Turangi is typical of principally primary based and tourism economies. There is relatively high unemployment and low income levels in the town. The 2001 census data shows the mean personal income in the Turangi area is $19,085. The mean household income is $37,014 with the median being $29,621. These factors bring the typical social problems associated with small low income towns such as less than optimal educational standards, unemployment and generally low education levels (the number of people holding tertiary qualifications is low).

Turangi is a town strong in Maoridom. Approximately 67% of the Turangi population are of Maori descent. The Iwi that dominates the district is Ngati Tuwharetoa. Ngati Tuwharetoa account for approximately 5% of the total NZ Maori population. Ngati Tuwharetoa has a tradition of strong tribal organisation through the paramount chief. In relation to many other Iwi they have maintained a high level of land ownership and direct control of their resources. A key principle that is maintained by Ngati Tuwharetoa, and that continues to be exercised, is its right of Tino Rangitiratanga (chieftainship) over its lands. This is a key principle that the Lake Taupo Forest Trust and Rotoaira Forest Trust exercise on behalf of the beneficial owners.

Areas having special spiritual, cultural or historical significance to Maori are known as wahi tapu. Special care must be taken to ensure such areas are not disturbed. Through the direct involvement of Ngati Tuwharetoa in forest management this is a fundamental aspect of management and is one of the lease objectives.

Other areas of special interest to Maori include traditional food resource (mahinga kai). Gathering of traditional medicinal (rongoa) plants can also be important.

Approximately 60-70% of the workforce of Lake Taupo and Rotoaira Forests are of maori descent. The remainder are primarily New Zealand European, with a small number of Pacific Islanders.

4.2 Environmental aspects

Water quality is the main environmental concern facing Lake Taupo and Rotoaira Forests currently. There is a great deal of discussion throughout the region regarding protection of Lake Taupo, particularly from the effects of increasing levels of nitrogen. This is primarily attributed to pastoral farming, although the consequences of regulation currently being developed by the regional authority has the potential to significantly affect all land uses within the district.

There are a number of biodiversity conservation initiatives taking place within the region currently that NZFM is a part of. These include:

• Protection on Dactylanthus taylorii from predation – NZFM has caged a number of the plants, which are classified as under ‘serious decline’ by the Department of Conservation. NZFM has also built an enclosure around a population on young host plants.

• Grey Willow Control – There is a management plan in place to control Grey Willow infestations within the Rotoaira Wetlands. NZFM received funding for the Biodiversity Condition Fund for this project, which has been very successful.

• NZ Falcon – NZFM is part of a group that is sponsoring research on the NZ Falcon. A PhD student from Massey University is carrying out this research

Pittosporum turnerii – NZFM has juvenile P.tunerii plants growing within Rotoaira Forest. The Department of Conservation classifies this species as ‘nationally critical’. Additional pest control is carried out when and where appropriate to protect this population.

4.3 Administration, Legislation and Guidelines

The following table lists the key national legislation, regulations, guidelines and codes of best practice that are relevant to forestry in the commercial, environmental and social sectors. This list does not

AD 36-A-03 of 53

purport to be comprehensive, but indicates information that is key to the forestry sector.

Legislation and regulation Notes

Forests and Rural Fires Act 1977

Bio-security Act 1993

Conservation Act 1987

Pesticides Act 1979

Wild Animal Control Act 1977

Employment Relations Act 2000

Treaty of Waitangi Act 1975

Historic Places Act 1993

Health & Safety In Employment Act 1992.

Trespass Act 1980

Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993

Forest and Rural Fires Regulations, 1979 & 2005

Forest Disease Control Regulations 1967

Co-operative Forestry Companies Act 1956

Crown Forests Assets Act 1989

Forestry Encouragement Act 1962

Forests Act 1949 & 1993 Amendment

Guidelines and Codes of Best Practice Notes

New Zealand Forestry Code of Practice

Code of Practice for the Management of Agrichemicals (NZS

8409:1999)

Principles for Commercial Forest Plantation Management in

New Zealand

NZ Forest Accord

Environmental Code of Practice for Plantation Forestry 2006

5. CHANGES IN MANAGEMENT, HARVESTING, SILVICULTURE AND MONITORING

The following table shows significant changes that took place in the management, monitoring, harvesting and regeneration practices of the certificate holder over the certificate period.

Description of Change Notes

SURVEILLANCE 1

Four new staff recruited. Induction programme and notes are on file.

Social Impact Assessment training courses. Staff attended courses with other companies.

Harvesting crews ceased using Timber Tech callipers as an aid for lag makers because of maintenance issues and lack of technical support.

Crews now are required to have a certified log-maker.

AD 36-A-03 of 53

Description of Change Notes

SURVEILLANCE 2

One new staff member, 1 replacement.

After consultation with Environment Waikato, forestry operations are deemed to be a “Permitted Activity”.

If the permitted activity rules are complied with, no resource consent is required. NZFM believe they can comply with the rules laid down.

SURVEILLANCE 3

Review of Health & Safety Policy and Management Plan.

Introduction of random Drug & Alcohol testing

SURVEILLANCE 4

Review of Health & Safety Policy and Management Plan. The review of the health and safety system is almost complete. One last meeting is being held prior to implementation (to gain final feedback). This meeting will also cover staff training against the revised system

6. PREPARATION FOR THE EVALUATION

6.1 Schedule

Information gathered was used to plan the main evaluation. Key stakeholders were identified.

6.2 Team

The table below shows the team that conducted the main evaluation.

Evaluation Team Notes

Team Leader Has degrees in forestry and Botany, 40 years experience in forestry regionally and nationally, 200 days FSC auditing, speaks English as the local language.

Local Specialist Has a doctorate in Social Science, 30 years experience in sociology internationally, and nationally.

Local Specialist Has a Doctorate in ecology, 10 years experience in environmental consulting work regionally and nationally.

6.3 Checklist Preparation

A checklist was prepared that consisted of the documents listed below. This checklist was prepared by adapting the QUALIFOR generic forest management checklist.

This adaptation included canvassing comments from stakeholders 4 weeks before the field evaluation. No comments were received from ENGO’s. A copy of this checklist is available on the SGS Qualifor website, www.sgs.com/forestry.

Standard Used in Evaluation Effective Date Version Nr Changes to Standard

SGS Qualifor: Generic Forest Management Standard (AD33) adapted for New Zealand

June 2005 1

AD 36-A-03 of 53

Standard Used in Evaluation Effective Date Version Nr Changes to Standard

SA 2011.24 SGS Forest Management Standard (AD33) adapted for New Zealand, version AD-33-NZ-03

20 December 2010.

3 Addition of indicator 5.5.3.

6.4 Stakeholder notification

A wide range of stakeholders were contacted 4 weeks before the planned evaluation to inform them of the evaluation and ask for their views on relevant forest management issues, These included the National Initiative Working Group, environmental interest groups, local government agencies and forestry authorities, forest user groups, and workers’ unions. The full list of stakeholders that were contacted is available from SGS. Responses received and comments from interviews are recorded under paragraph 13 of this Public Summary.

7. THE EVALUATION

The Main Evaluation was conducted in the steps outlined below.

7.1 Opening meeting

An opening meeting was held at the NZFM Office at Turangi. The scope of the evaluation was explained and schedules were determined. Record was kept of all persons that attended this meeting.

7.2 Document review

A review of the main forest management documentation was conducted to evaluate the adequacy of coverage of the QUALIFOR Programme requirements. This involved examination of policies, management plans, systems, procedures, instructions and controls.

7.3 Sampling and Evaluation Approach

A detailed record of the following is available in section B of the evaluation report. This section does not form part of the public summary, but includes information on:

� Sampling methodology and rationale;

� FMUs included in the sample;

� Sites visited during the field evaluation; and

� Man-day allocation.

The Assessment Team met with company management and staff, met with owners and assessed 2 FMU’s in 4 days.

7.4 Field assessments

Field assessments aimed to determine how closely activities in the field complied with documented management systems and QUALIFOR Programme requirements. Interviews with staff, operators and contractors were conducted to determine their familiarity with and their application of policies, procedures and practices that are relevant to their activities. A carefully selected sample of sites was visited to evaluate whether practices met the required performance levels.

AD 36-A-03 of 53

7.5 Stakeholder interviews

Meetings or telephone interviews were held with stakeholders as determined by the responses to notification letters and SGS discretion as to key stakeholders that should be interviewed. These aimed to:

� clarify any issues raised and the company’s responses to them;

� obtain additional information where necessary; and

� obtain the views of key stakeholders that did not respond to the written invitation sent out before the evaluation.

Nr of Stakeholders

contacted

Nr of Interviews with

NGOs Government Other

MAIN EVALUATION

150 1 3 5

SURVEILLANCE 1

12 3 6

SURVEILLANCE 2

12 - 3 5

SURVEILLANCE 3

10 2 5

SURVEILLANCE 4

26 - 3 11

Responses received and comments from interviews are recorded under paragraph 13 of this Public Summary.

7.6 Summing up and closing meeting

At the conclusion of the field evaluation, findings were presented to company management at a closing meeting. Any areas of non-conformance with the QUALIFOR Programme were raised as one of two types of Corrective Action Request (CAR):

� Major CARs - which must be addressed and re-assessed before certification can proceed

� Minor CARs - which do not preclude certification, but must be addressed within an agreed time frame, and will be checked at the first surveillance visit

A record was kept of persons that attended this meeting.

8. EVALUATION RESULTS

Detailed evaluation findings are included in Section B of the evaluation report. This does not form part of the public summary. For each QUALIFOR requirement, these show the related findings, and any observations or corrective actions raised. The main issues are discussed below.

AD 36-A-03 of 53

8.1 Findings related to the general QUALIFOR Programme

PRINCIPLE 1: COMPLIANCE WITH LAW AND FSC PRINCIPLES

Criterion 1.1 Respect for national and local laws and administrative requirements

Strengths SA 2009: Environment Waikato proactively considered that forest operations can now be undertaken under the Permitted Activity rules of the Regional Plan. The company can comply with the rules and conditions of the Plan. SA 2010: High level of compliance noted by Regional Council.

Weaknesses

Compliance NZFM subscribes to Brookers legislation updates and receives monthly updates on the RMA and other Acts. The company notes updates from Environment Waikato via their website. At the six-monthly EMS reviews, the company notes any legislative changes in the reviewed document.

Criterion 1.2 Payment of legally prescribed fees, royalties, taxes and other charges

Strengths

Weaknesses

Compliance The accounts are audited. There is no evidence of any non-payment of accounts. Budgets make provision for all future costs, including appropriate fees.

Criterion 1.3 Respect for provisions of international agreements

Strengths

Weaknesses NZFM is adhering to their responsibilities under CITES. However, not all staff are aware of what those obligations are. See Observation #4

Compliance DoC administers the CITES agreement. No reports of any non-compliance by the company.

SA 2008.21: A description of CITES, IBC and ILO agreements has been incorporated into the EMS.

SA 2011.2.4 A description of CITES, IBC and ILO agreements has been incorporated into the EMS, and staff are aware of the requirements.

Criterion 1.4 Conflicts between laws and regulations, and the FSC P&C

Strengths

Weaknesses

Compliance No conflicts have been identified.

SA 2008.21: In 2007, two Regional Councils (Environment Waikato and Horizons MW) conducted large-scale possum control operations using aerial application of 1080 over parts of Lake Rotoaira Forest. The operations were planned, organised and conducted by Regional Council contractors under contract to the Animal Health Board. This is a government organisation implementing the Biosecurity Act for bovine Tb control. The Company ensured that its stakeholders were consulted by the AHB contractors.

Criterion 1.5 Protection of forests from illegal activities

Strengths

Weaknesses

Compliance No illegal harvesting takes place. No illegal settlement has been noted or reported. The main unauthorised activity is the dumping of household rubbish in some areas. The company has reported such activity to the District Council. The Council has made some Company staff honorary Litter Officers so that they can issue infringement notices.

AD 36-A-03 of 53

Criterion 1.6 Demonstration of a long-term commitment to the FSC P&C

Strengths The company has prepared a one page document about FSC that all contractors had in their vehicles.

Weaknesses There is an opportunity to add value to the above communication. See Observation#1

SA 2008.21 It will be important to continue the explanation of FSC to stakeholders, particularly new people in the contract crews. See Observation #10

Compliance The company website contains a full endorsement of FSC, signed by the General Manager.

SA 2008.21 The company has re-written the contractor hand-out. See Close out of Observation #1 in Section 12 of this report.

SA 2009: The company policy is explained to new contractors. Crews interviewed understood the points about FSC. The FSC pamphlet is still in vehicles.

PRINCIPLE 2: TENURE AND USE RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES

Criterion 2.1 Demonstration of land tenure and forest use rights

Strengths SA 2008.21 The Lake Taupo and Lake Rotoaira Forest Trusts are progressively taking control of forestry activities from the Crown, after clear felling.

Weaknesses

Compliance NZFM Ltd manages a complex and significant network of interests and agreements on behalf of the Trusts and the Crown; they have been managers of Lake Taupo and Lake Rotoaira Forests (and some smaller units) since 1989. A joint committee (FORMAC) effectively governs the process and provides a mechanism to discuss issues that affect all parties.

Criterion 2.2 Local communities’ legal or customary tenure or use rights

Strengths

Weaknesses

Compliance The customary use rights of the beneficial owners, as represented by the Trusts, are documented in the leases. The forest plans and operations are subject to the terms and conditions of the leases. The forest is accessible to beneficial owners under a permit system.

Criterion 2.3 Disputes over tenure claims and use rights

Strengths

Weaknesses

Compliance A disputes procedure is documented in the EMS. FORMAC is able to resolve disputes amongst the main participants in the project; the minutes contain records of any disputes.

PRINCIPLE 3: INDIGENOUS PEOPLES’ RIGHTS

Criterion 3.1 Indigenous peoples’ control of forest management

Strengths

Weaknesses

Compliance The Lake Taupo Forest (LTF) Trust and Lake Rotoaira Forest (LRF) Trust represent the indigenous peoples and protect their rights through leases and agreements to ensure that the rights of the beneficial owners are recognized in ownership, use and management of the forests and lands.

SA 2008.21 The Trusts have assumed control of all second-rotation forests and are re-investing in the new crop.

AD 36-A-03 of 53

Criterion 3.2 Maintenance of indigenous peoples’ resources or tenure rights

Strengths

Weaknesses

Compliance There are no known impacts on indigenous resources. The Trusts have given NZ Forest Managers free and informed consent to carry out forest operations.

Criterion 3.3 Protection of sites of special cultural, ecological, economic or religious significance

to indigenous peoples

Strengths The high incidence of beneficial owners among contractors and crews ensures a strong interest in protection of significant features and sites.

SA 2011.24: A Waahi Tapu Committee is in place. All Waahi Tapu sites are well marked on operational maps with a comprehensive register held to back up mapping references. Visited sites are well protected and the Trusts spoke very highly of the NZFM management of Waahi Tapu and special sites.

Weaknesses

Compliance Waahi Tapu and historic sites are registered and protected. Maps are prepared which indicate locations of sites which may be in work areas. The sites are well marked. An important site was visited during the assessment. The sites are managed in accordance with strict guidelines developed by the Trusts. Any discovery of new sites is referred to the Waahi tapu committee of the Trusts.

Criterion 3.4 Compensation of indigenous peoples for the application of their traditional

knowledge

Strengths

Weaknesses

Compliance Beneficial owners gain access to the forest for traditional purposes, e.g. for medicinal plants and cultural activities.

PRINCIPLE 4: COMMUNITY RELATIONS AND WORKERS RIGHTS

Criterion 4.1 Employment, training, and other services for local communities

Strengths An annual survey of the workforce (excluding the 100 transport operators) has been conducted since 2002 to monitor trends and to describe gender, age, residence, number of dependents, Maori descent and tribal affiliations, beneficial ownership, duration with the same employer, years of experience and national certificates held. In 2006, questions were added about the NZFM drug and alcohol policy which was initiated in December 2005. Findings from the survey are posted on the NZFM website.

SA 2009: The company completed the 5th Workforce survey during 2008.

SA 2010: Another workforce survey completed in 2009.

Weaknesses An opportunity exists to make the roll-over of contracts more transparent. See Observation #3

Compliance All contractors must meet performance standards. Training is provided by NZFM for harvesting and silviculture crews. Training achievements are documented for contractors’ workers and records were sighted on field visits. Visits to schools and support of young people for education, sport and cultural activities assist in identifying the opportunities for forest employment in the local community.

SA 2008.21 The Company is working within the constraints of its contractual arrangements. See close-out of Observation #3 in Section 12.

Criterion 4.2 Compliance with health and safety regulations

Strengths In December 2005 a Drug and Alcohol policy was introduced for contractors. Pre employment testing now occurs and there is a protocol for random testing by an independent agent for the crews in the forest.

NZFM participates in industry wide safety recording and industry initiatives to improve safety performance.

SA 2010: Random testing now in place and accepted by contractors.

AD 36-A-03 of 53

SA 2011.24: A fully revised version of the company Health & Safety is about to be implemented. The revised system is very comprehensive.

Weaknesses

Compliance NZFM Ltd has a comprehensive Health and Safety policy and contractors are regularly audited by NZFM as well as by independent auditors. NZFM Ltd monitors accident statistics daily. PPE is provided by contractors and its use was observed on site

Criterion 4.3 Workers’ rights to organise and negotiate with employers

Strengths

Weaknesses

Compliance Workers are free to organise or join unions but none have done so. Workers are free to bargain collectively. Most reported that they prefer to approach their employer individually.

Criterion 4.4 Social impact evaluations and consultation

Strengths

Weaknesses The forests have indirect impacts on many people, residents and visitors. Most communications with the wider community are passive unless there is an event or negative communication. See Observation #2

Compliance The environmental management system (EMS) provides for comprehensive social impact assessment as part of operational planning. Social impact assessments are carried out when required, e.g. a significant change in operation or for a new operation or activity. This includes consultation with affected parties. Social impacts are regularly monitored; the six monthly managers meetings also review social impacts. Over the past year social impact assessments include construction of a weighbridge, a clear felling operation and a new logging site.

A comprehensive list of stakeholders is maintained and was last updated in October 2006.

SA 2008.21 Several low-key but important visits have been arranged. See close-out of Observation #2 in Section 12.

SA 2011.24: Stakeholder lists are revised and updated annually. Comprehensive Social Impact Assessments have been undertaken.

Criterion 4.5 Resolution of grievances and settlement of compensation claims

Strengths

Weaknesses

Compliance The dispute resolution process was used to review and consult with a number of stakeholders with regard to the use of 1080 by Environment Waikato for the Animal Health Board (AHB).

PRINCIPLE 5: BENEFITS FROM THE FOREST

Criterion 5.1 Economic viability taking full environmental, social, and operational costs into

account

Strengths

Weaknesses

Compliance Care is taken at each harvest site to optimise the cutting of trees into logs to achieve best market return. A large number of log grades are required by the company’s customers.

Criterion 5.2 Optimal use and local processing of forest products

Strengths

Weaknesses

AD 36-A-03 of 53

Compliance NZFM Ltd has been promoting markets for FSC-certified logs. Local processors are supplied as a matter of preference. Up to 20 different log grades are available. Local customers have benefited from consistent supply over a long period, as the cut has remained consistent.

Criterion 5.3 Waste minimisation and avoidance of damage to forest resources

Strengths Strategic planning using the Folpi estate model exceeds national best practice standards.

Weaknesses

Compliance The annual and site specific harvest plans that flow from the strategic plan actively discourage waste, and this is apparent from site visits. Harvest techniques are appropriate to each site.

Criterion 5.4 Forest management and the local economy

Strengths

Weaknesses

Compliance The various non-timber demands from the two Trusts are accommodated as much as possible. A range of products are extracted from the forest, such as flax, toi toi and rongoa. The forests are used for hunting, both deer and pigs. Evidence of hunting permit numbers was seen. A large amount of firewood is also removed.

Criterion 5.5 Maintenance of the value of forest services and resources

Strengths

Weaknesses

Compliance The managers have mapped and documented all water courses and their catchments. They are placed in the GIS at harvest planning stage and stay as a complete layer. The environmental impact checklist and follow-up supervision ensure that no impacts occur on resources or on services.

Criterion 5.6 Harvest levels

Strengths

Weaknesses

Compliance Quality control plots after planting record regeneration. Harvest volumes are reconciled against predicted volumes by forest harvest unit and by log type. Yield tables are then adjusted by the actual recovery. The annual harvest is at the calculated sustainable yield now (660,000 m³). This is based on up to date information from PSPs and the growth model. The replenishment rate is not exceeded.

SA2009: The calculated sustainable yield is now 693,000 m3.

PRINCIPLE 6: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT

Criterion 6.1 Environmental impacts evaluation

Strengths

Weaknesses

Compliance NZFM Ltd has a well developed environmental impact identification procedure. Those areas within their estate that have particular environmental risk are identified on GIS. These include wetland areas, reserves and waterways. Operational plans contain maps identifying the areas of environmental concern within an operational area.

NZFM Ltd has also produced environmental impact assessments for specific areas. A “Harvesting Environmental Standards and Assessment” sheet is produced for each operational area listing the potential hazards and the standards to be followed. A random sample of assessments is audited each year and the performance of the contractor checked.

Criterion 6.2 Protection of rare, threatened and endangered species

Strengths NZFM Ltd has developed management plans for flora species of conservation concern, e.g. Pittosporum

AD 36-A-03 of 53

turneri and Dactylanthus taylorii and they should be commended for their work in these areas.

SA 2008.21: NZFM staff have completed the predator-proof fence around the Dactlylanthis area; this was part funded by the Biodiversity Condition Fund, administered by DoC.

Weaknesses

Compliance NZFM Ltd has commissioned several flora and fauna assessments within their forest estate. These assessments have provided the company with an inventory of the species present. These reports list the species by their threat status. Further to these inventories, NZFM have performed surveys for kiwi, blue duck, short - and long-tailed bats, fish and lizards. These fine level assessments have helped to identify the presence of these RTE species and the habitat where they occur.

Criterion 6.3 Maintenance of ecological functions and values

Strengths

Weaknesses

Compliance All indigenous areas within NZFM’s forests are protected from harvesting. NZFM has a water quality monitoring programme within its Lake Taupo Forest. NZFM is in the process of removing wildings from throughout their indigenous reserve areas.

Criterion 6.4 Protection of representative samples of existing ecosystems

Strengths

Weaknesses

Compliance Large areas of indigenous reserve are protected under the lease agreement with the Trusts. These areas include extensive riparian zones and wetlands with more than 20% being held as non-productive for the protection of biodiversity, water and soil values.

Criterion 6.5 Protection against damage to soils, residual forest and water resources during

operations

Strengths Contractors are provided with information on the correct procedures with regards to issues including: fuel and oil storage, native flora and fauna, felling in sensitive areas, soil and water conservation issues and recycling. In addition, all operational plans contain maps show environmental hazards and outline the correct guidelines for working in these areas. Prescriptions call for trees to be felled away from environmentally sensitive areas such as waterways and wetlands. Field visits showed that prescriptions were being followed and it was apparent during the assessment that operational protocols around waterways and wetlands were of a very high standard.

Weaknesses

Compliance The company has set riparian buffer zones of varying sizes around their waterways.

Criterion 6.6 Chemical pest management

Strengths

Weaknesses NZFM has a secure store to hold small quantities of herbicides as well as fire control chemicals. The appropriate hazard and chemical sheets are held in the main office of NZFM but are not available in the chemical store. See Observation #5.

An inventory of the chemicals held on site is kept within the store as well as on a spreadsheet within the main office. There was some discrepancy between chemicals held in the store and the inventory. See Observation #6

Contractors were interviewed during the 2007 assessment and found to hold the necessary certifications for chemical use. However, the NZFM staff member in charge of the chemical did not have the correct documentation available at the time of the assessment. See Observation #7.

Compliance NZFM list of the chemicals retained is on their company database. This register records the toxicity, half life, persistence and the amount used for each chemical. Chemical application rates for each operation are recorded as well as the amounts used.

The company has trialled several alternatives to the chemical control of weeds. In addition, NZFM has changed the rates of chemical application, timing of application and the chemicals themselves. From the results of these trials NZFM has been able to reduce the amount of chemicals it applies throughout its estate

AD 36-A-03 of 53

by a significant amount.

SA 2008.21 Processes around the chemical documentation have been addressed. See close-out of Observations # 5, 6 & 7 in Section 12.

SA 2010: Derogation extensions obtained for Terbuthylazine and Hexazinone.

Criterion 6.7 Use and disposal of chemicals, containers, liquid and solid non-organic wastes

Strengths

Weaknesses NZFM has recycled some of their herbicide containers for further use to hold non-toxic dyes. While this recycling effort is to be commended they must ensure that containers are labelled correctly. See CAR #002

Compliance Medium to small (20l) sized chemical containers are tripled rinsed and returned to the manufacturer. To reduce wastage further NZFM purchases the larger, reusable chemical containers for most of their aerial operations.

SA 2008.21 CAR #002 closed out. See Section 11 of this report.

Criterion 6.8 Use of biological control agents and genetically modified organisms

Strengths

Weaknesses

Compliance At present only the buddleia leaf eating weevil Cleopus japonicus is being trialled in the forest. This biological control agent has been cleared for use by MAF and the Environmental Risk Management Authority (ERMA), and is being monitored by ENSIS. Details for the justification for biological control agents have been supplied by ENSIS, MAF and ERMA.

No GM organisms are used by the company.

Biological control of exotic heather is being trialled by Landcare Research and DoC; a small area of Lake Rotoaira Forest is being used.

SA 2010: Heather Beetle found that conditions were not suitable.

Criterion 6.9 The use of exotic species

Strengths

Weaknesses

Compliance NZFM constantly monitors wilding and regeneration within its estate. It has trialled different methods for regeneration control. These methods have included both chemical and non-chemical methodologies. NZFM is also actively controlling the spread of willows within its riparian areas and wetlands. The potential of exotic trees to spread has been considered and is included in NZFM’s IPMS.

Criterion 6.10 Forest conversion to plantations or non-forest land uses

Strengths

Weaknesses

Compliance NZFM protects its indigenous and riparian areas; therefore there is no forest conversion.

PRINCIPLE 7: MANAGEMENT PLAN

Criterion 7.1 Management plan requirements

Strengths

Weaknesses

Compliance NZFM’s EMS is a comprehensive document that covers all the aspects of environmental management within their plantation forestry estate.

There are management plans for: Lake Taupo Crown lease forest; Rotoaira Crown lease forest; Lake Taupo and Rotoaira Crown enclaves; the Trust-owned part of Lake Taupo forest; and the Trust-owned part of Lake Rotoaira forest. They contain all the information required for management of the forests: the Trust’s

AD 36-A-03 of 53

objectives, their forest management policy, access agreements, and protection of the forest. Management objectives are clearly defined in all plans. Each plan describes the areas and location, the geography and environmental issues concerning each forest.

Criterion 7.2 Management plan revision

Strengths

Weaknesses There is an opportunity for conducting the forest health surveys at other sites where short-tailed bats and Woodrose are present. In these areas NZFM could formalise their approach to ensure that if forest health indicators suggest habitat degradation, appropriate action would occur as had happened elsewhere in their estate. See Observation #8

Compliance Management plan responsibilities are defined. NZFM and the Trusts belong to appropriate research cooperatives and are involved in the research company Future Forests. The company regularly receives technical updates and information on research progress. The company liaises with key DoC staff and Landcare Research to ensure that the latest biodiversity information is made available.

SA 2008.21 The agency carrying out the forest health monitoring work has agreed to add an extra plot in Lake Rotoaira Forest. (Observation #8)

SA 2011.24: Revisions of the EMS continue to be undertaken on a six monthly basis, and the Management Plan continues to be reviewed annually (incorporating industry and monitoring developments).

Criterion 7.3 Training and supervision of forest workers

Strengths The company managers and supervisors are well-educated and trained for forestry activity. The planning and organisation of all forestry activities is exemplary.

Weaknesses

Compliance All forest workers are trained for task. The assessment team saw one new recruit in Lake Rotoaira forest under the close supervision of a senior crew member. Each crew visited had records of learning for their crew. The company supports formal training courses and a harvesting trainer who can visit other crews.

Criterion 7.4 Public availability of the management plan elements

Strengths

Weaknesses SA 2011.24:

Observation 12: While the Estate Management Plan is reviewed regularly (annually). It will also be important to update the Management Plan summary document (available on the company website) as revisions of the Management Plan are undertaken.

Compliance A public summary of the Management Plan is available on the company website.

PRINCIPLE 8: MONITORING AND EVALUATION

Criterion 8.1 Frequency, intensity and consistency of monitoring

Strengths Water monitoring has occurred for over 10 years and the data collected has provided important information as to the change in the aquatic environment through operational practices. This information is available to the forestry industry through seminars.

SA 2009: This long-term data has been requested by Power companies, Landcare Research, Waikato University and the School of Forestry.

Weaknesses

Compliance NZFM has a selection of monitoring programmes. These include stream quality monitoring, indigenous forest health monitoring, Pittosporum turneri health and woodrose monitoring. Generally the monitoring programmes have a well defined purpose. Objectives are also generally clearly stated and methodology/procedures are provided.

Criterion 8.2 Research and data collection for monitoring

Strengths NZFM has set up a comprehensive forest health monitoring programme within its indigenous reserve areas. There is a very effective monitoring programme for the protection of P. turneri and they are now starting to monitor Woodrose present within the forests. These projects are of a very high standard and show the

AD 36-A-03 of 53

commitment of the company to the enhancement of New Zealand’s indigenous biodiversity.

Weaknesses

Compliance The growth of the forest is assessed and is also modelled to ensure yield sustainability. The yields of logs produced from the forest are recorded. Log dockets from each load of logs produced record the gang, compartment, forest, grade and volume. This data is accumulated via a specialised programme.

The company collects and assesses data on its performance.

Criterion 8.3 Chain of custody

Strengths

Weaknesses The use of the Trademark on the company website is not in accordance with FSC policy and has not been approved by SGS. Similarly, the use of the FSC Trademark on the hand-out sheet for contractors is not in accordance with FSC policy. See CAR #001

SA 2011/24:

Observation 13: While a clear CoC process is in place and Hog Fuel from the forest is not currently sold as certified, it may be useful to use docket books for these sales which do not contain the NZ Forest Managers promotional use label, in order to prevent any confusion over the certification status of the material.

CAR 03: Use of the FSC Trademarks has not been updated to meet the requirements of FSC-STD-50-001.

Compliance As each truck is loaded, the loader driver gives a uniquely numbered log docket to the driver. This docket has the weight added at an authorised weigh bridge. The docket remains with the load. Loads from non-certified forests are accompanied by dockets without the FSC logo, and with a different numbering system.

A sample of tax invoices was checked. All those for certified customers contained the correct certificate number in the correct format. The volumes of logs sold to COC certificate holders are kept and reported.

The use of the Trademark on the log docket book for use in the certified forests is in accordance with FSC policy and was approved by SGS after the first certificate was issued.

Criterion 8.4 Incorporation of monitoring results into the management plan

Strengths

Weaknesses The company could develop a strategic monitoring plan to bring all monitoring programmes, and their rationale, together in one place to allow an overview. See Observation #9

SA 2008.21 It will be useful to continue adding to the Monitoring Plan template, noting those activities that are confidential and describing their frequency, reporting sequences and responsibility, to build a complete picture of monitoring activities. See Observation # 11.

Compliance NZFM regularly analyses their monitoring results and uses them, and other data to prioritise and improve their management programmes.

SA 2008.21 A monitoring plan has been developed. See close out for Observation # 9 in Section 12.

SA2009: The Monitoring Plan Summary has been added to during the year.

Criterion 8.5 Publicly available summary of monitoring

Strengths

Weaknesses

Compliance The company notifies the monitoring work that is undertaken on its website. It will respond to any requests for information, but no requests have been made to date.

PRINCIPLE 9: HIGH CONSERVATION VALUE FORESTS

Criterion 9.1 Evaluation to determine high conservation value attributes

Strengths

Weaknesses

Compliance NZFM and the Trusts have, in consultation with DoC and other local experts, determined that there are no

AD 36-A-03 of 53

HCVF areas present within their estate.

SA 2011.24: NZFM and the Trusts, in consultation with DoC and other local experts including Taupo District Council staff, have determined that there are no HCVF areas present within their estate.

However, the Environmental Manager is currently in the process of re-evaluating the estate in consultation with stakeholders (such as Forest & Bird, DoC, Taupo District Council, the Trusts, Environment Waikato and Project Tongariro).

In addition to feedback from stakeholders, information is being sought from:

• The Register of Forest Sites of Natural Value;

• The Significant Natural Areas database

• Blue duck reports

• Wetland inventory evaluations; and the

• NZ Threat Classification system.

Feedback from stakeholders and information sources will be overlaid, and the HVCF criteria assessed. The re-assessment of the estate is intended to be completed by the end of 2011. If HVCF areas are identified, management plans will be established and will be sent to stakeholders for consultation.

Criterion 9.2 Consultation process

Strengths

Weaknesses

Compliance N/A

Criterion 9.3 Measures to maintain and enhance high conservation value attributes

Strengths

Weaknesses

Compliance N/A

Criterion 9.4 Monitoring to assess effectiveness

Strengths

Weaknesses

Compliance N/A

PRINCIPLE 10: PLANTATIONS

Criterion 10.1 Statement of objectives in the management plan

Strengths

Weaknesses

Compliance The management objectives are:

• Prevent soil erosion, reduce pollution of the waters of Lake Taupo and of the streams and rivers flowing into and out of the Lake;

• Conserve and protect fish, wild-life habitat and other natural resources of the area;

• Preserve and safeguard the graves of the Maori people and all historic and sacred places;

Consistent with above, establish, manage and protect a forest in a manner consistent with good forestry practices.

Achievement has been demonstrated in a number of ways since the forest began.

AD 36-A-03 of 53

Criterion 10.2 Plantation design and layout

Strengths

Weaknesses

Compliance All natural vegetation areas are mapped. Riparian zones are demarcated for protection in management plans. Buffer zones are identified and protected. Contractors are aware of their importance.

Criterion 10.3 Diversity in composition

Strengths

Weaknesses

Compliance A variety of cuttings, clonal material and seedlings are planted. The seedlings have a range of attributes, depending on the site. The company analyses environmental impacts through water quality monitoring and subsequent growth of new replanting. No adverse impacts have been detected from the current level of cut and size of coupe.

Socio-economic impacts are measured by stakeholder comments and continued local employment.

Criterion 10.4 Species selection

Strengths

Weaknesses

Compliance Radiata pine is the preferred species for the NZ forest industry and it grows well on the range of sites in the Trusts’ forests. NZFM attempts to improve the performance by continued trialling of provenances and clones. And matching to specific sites. NZFM participates in the NZ forest health surveillance programme. Recent reports were seen.

Criterion 10.5 Restoration of natural forest

Strengths

Weaknesses

Compliance With over 20% of the area in natural vegetation the Trusts are reluctant to convert any more land. Nevertheless, some areas where harvesting has been difficult have been allowed to revert to natural vegetation.

Criterion 10.6 Impacts on soil and water

Strengths

Weaknesses

Compliance Broad soil type maps are available. The forest soils are predominantly pumice. Tracks are restored and harvest slash is spread about. Harvest skid sites are ripped and replanted. All rivers, streams and wetlands are identified, ranked and mapped.

Criterion 10.7 Pests and diseases

Strengths

Weaknesses

Compliance The major forest pests and diseases have been identified through a national programme. The company has an Integrated Pest Management Strategy, which complies with the Regional PMS.

The company governs and runs the Lake Taupo Rural Fire District. Fire suppression equipment meets national requirements. Staff issue fire permits.

AD 36-A-03 of 53

Criterion 10.8 Monitoring of impacts, species testing and tenure rights

Strengths

Weaknesses

Compliance A range of monitoring covers on-site impacts (e.g. operational quality, water quality, tree growth for soil impacts), off-site impacts (e.g. wilding spread, water quality before streams leave the forest) and social impacts (e.g. landscape issues and workforce impacts)

Criterion 10.9 Plantations established in areas converted from natural forests after November

1994

Strengths

Weaknesses

Compliance The company complies with the NZ Forest Accord. The forest does not occupy land converted since 1994.

9. CERTIFICATION DECISION

SGS considers that NZ Forest Managers Limited’s forest management of Lake Taupo & Lake Rotoaira Forest Trusts and the Crown Enclave forests, near Turangi can be certified as:

i. There are no outstanding Major Corrective Action Requests

ii. The outstanding Minor Corrective Action Requests do not preclude certification, but NZ Forest Managers is required to take the agreed actions before February 2008. These will be verified by SGS QUALIFOR at the first surveillance to be carried out about 12 months from the date of the issuance of the certificate. If satisfactory actions have been taken, the CARs will be ‘closed out’; otherwise, Minor CARs will be raised to Major CARs.

iii. The management system, if implemented as described, is capable of ensuring that all of the requirements of the applicable standard(s) are met over the whole forest area covered by the scope of the evaluation;

iv. The certificate holder has demonstrated, subject to the specified corrective actions, that the described system of management is being implemented consistently over the whole forest area covered by the scope of the certificate.

10. MAINTENANCE OF CERTIFICATION

During the surveillance evaluation, it is assessed if there is continuing compliance with the requirements of the Qualifor Programme. Any areas of non-conformance with the QUALIFOR Programme are raised as one of two types of Corrective Action Request (CAR):

.01 Major CARs - which must be addressed and closed out urgently with an agreed short time frame since the organisation is already a QUALIFOR certified organisation. Failure to close out within the agreed time frame can lead to suspension of the certificate.

.02 Minor CARs - which must be addressed within an agreed time frame, and will normally be checked at the next surveillance visit

The full record of CARs raised over the certification period is listed under section 11 below.

The table below provides a progressive summary of findings for each surveillance. A complete record of observations demonstrating compliance or non-compliance with each criterion of the Forest Stewardship Standard is contained in a separate document that does not form part of the public summary.

SURVEILLANCE 1

AD 36-A-03 of 53

Issues that were hard to assess

The use of 1080 for possum control for Bovine Tb eradication by the Government agency (the Animal Health Board) under the Biosecurity Act.

Number of CARs closed Two outstanding CARs were closed.

Nr of CARs remaining open No outstanding CARs from previous evaluations were not closed.

New CARs raised No new Major CARs and no Minor CARs were raised.

Recommendation The forest management of the forests of NZ Forest Managers Ltd remains certified as:

� The management system is capable of ensuring that all of the requirements of the applicable standard(s) are met over the whole forest area covered by the scope of the evaluation; and

� The certificate holder has demonstrated, subject to the specified corrective actions, that the described system of management is being implemented consistently over the whole forest area covered by the scope of the certificate.

SURVEILLANCE 2


The Company has been liaising with the Animal Health Board over their proposal to use 1080, delivered from the air, over parts of their forests. This was difficult to assess because it does not comply with the FSC derogation conditions and so the company has to insist on the AHB providing a letter which stipulates that the operation will be required to take place under the provisions of the Biosecurity Act. The operation is in the planning stages and so the process has not been worked through, but it creates tension between the two organisations which have worked well together in the past.

Number of CARs closed No CAR’s were closed.

Nr of CARs remaining open No CAR’s remain open.

Nr of New CARs raised No new Major CARs and no Minor CARs were raised.



� The certificate holder has demonstrated, subject to the specified corrective actions, that the described system of management is being implemented consistently over the whole forest area covered by the scope of the certificate.

SURVEILLANCE 3


The issue with aerial application of 1080 remains. The application for derogation extension has been sent to FSC.

Number of CARs closed No CAR’s were closed.

Nr of CARs remaining open No CAR’s remain open.

Nr of New CARs raised No new Major CARs and no Minor CARs were raised.



� The certificate holder has demonstrated, subject to the specified corrective actions, that the described system of management is being implemented consistently over the whole forest area covered by the scope of the

AD 36-A-03 of 53

certificate.

SURVEILLANCE 4


There were no issues that were hard to assess during surveillance 4. The 1080 application issue has now been resolved with the revision of FSC-DER-30V1-0 EN 1080 NZ 01032011, which allows aerial application by the AHB. The AHB also continue to invoke Section 114 of the Biosecurity Act in order to carry out aerial application of 1080 over parts of the NZ Forest Managers estate,

Number of CARs closed 0 CARs closed

Nr of CARs remaining open 0 CARs remain open

Nr of New CARs raised 1 Minor CAR was raised

Recommendation The forest management of the forests of NZ Forest Managers Ltd to remain certified as:


The certificate holder has demonstrated, subject to the specified corrective actions, that the described system of management is being implemented consistently over the whole forest area covered by the scope of the certificate.

AD 36-A-03 of 53

11. RECORD OF CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUESTS (CARS)

CAR # Indicator CAR Detail

01 8.3.5 Date

Recorded>

23 03 2007 Due Date>

1st

surveillance Date Closed> 09 04 2008

Non-Conformance:

Some uses of the Trademark are not in accordance with FSC policy and have not been approved by SGS.

Objective Evidence:

The use of the Trademark in the “Certification” section of the company’s website does not have the certificate number or a claim statement on the page.

The use of the Trademark on the document sent to contractors does not have the copyright requirements or a claim statement.

Close-out evidence:

The Trademark on the document sent to contractors is in accordance with FSC policy and has been approved by SGS.

The website use is appropriate.

02 6.6.5, 6.7.1 Date

Recorded>

23/03/2007 Due Date>

1st

surveillance Date Closed> 09 04 2008

Non-Conformance:

The management of chemical storage in the chemical store is inadequate.

Objective Evidence:

Small amounts of chemicals are stored, but no bund or drip tray was in place to catch any accidental spills.

One container containing dye still had its original chemical label in place.

Close-out evidence:

A new bund has been built within the chemical store. Small amounts of chemical are stored, and there was no evidence of drips or spills.

A copy of the MSD sheets is located in the chemical store.

The container holding dye is clearly marked.

03 8.3.5 Date

Recorded>

12 May 2011 Due Date>

2012 Re-Assessment Date Closed>

dd mmm yy

Non-Conformance:

Use of the FSC Trademarks has not been updated to meet the requirements of FSC-STD-50-001.

Objective Evidence:

AD 36-A-03 of 53

CAR # Indicator CAR Detail

Existing use of the FSC Trademarks was examined within the company website, delivery docket books and within a contractor FSC information handout sheet.

While existing printed material containing the old FSC Trademarks may remain in use, the company website requires updating to meet the new requirements, and must be approved by SGS Qualifor prior to implementation.

Close-out evidence:

AD 36-A-03 of 53

12. RECORD OF OBSERVATIONS

OBS # Indicator Observation Detail

01 1.6.2 Date Recorded> 23/03/2007 Date Closed> 09 04 2008

Observation:

An opportunity exists to note how NZFM complies with the FSC P&C as a back page to the existing FSC description, when it is revised to take account of the Trademark issue.

Follow-up evidence:

The Company has re-written the contractor information to produce a double-sided, laminated hand-out with key messages about how NZFM is complying with FSC principles. Approval for the Trademark use was obtained from SGS.


Observation:

There is an opportunity for NZFM (and the Trusts) to consider some potential low key communication with key groups, such as an occasional forest visit for selected groups similar to the NZ Farm Forestry Annual Conference visit held in 2005.

Follow-up evidence:

Several low-key but important visits have been arranged, for example for several international visitors, AHB staff and new MAF employees, to demonstrate forestry activities and practices.


Observation:

An opportunity exists to make the roll-over of contracts more transparent.

Follow-up evidence:

The Company is working within the constraints of its contractual arrangements with the Trusts and The Crown to ensure clarity of contract roll-over with current contractors.


Observation:

It will be important to formally establish the company’s obligations under CITES and to prepare a list of species affected.

Follow-up evidence:

A description of CITES, IBC and ILO agreements has been incorporated into the EMS.


Observation:

It will be important to have copies of the chemical MSD sheets in the chemical store as well as in the main office.

AD 36-A-03 of 53


Follow-up evidence:

Copies of the chemical MSD sheets are clearly identified and located in the chemical store.


Observation:

It will be important to maintain accurate chemical inventory records at all times.

Follow-up evidence:

The chemical inventory records are accurate, up to date and meet HASNO requirements.


Observation:

It will be important for the appropriate NZFM staff to have the full Growsafe and Approved Handler certificates.

Follow-up evidence:

The relevant certificates are on file and displayed on staff member’s office wall.


Observation:

It will be useful to modify or extend forest health monitoring plots to those areas where RTE species such as the Woodrose and Short-tailed bats are present.

Follow-up evidence:

The agency carrying out the forest health monitoring work has agreed with the company to add an extra plot in Lake Rotoaira Forest.


Observation:

It will be useful for the company to develop a strategic monitoring plan to bring all monitoring programmes, and their rationale, together in one place to allow an overview.

Follow-up evidence:

The Company has investigated a variety of monitoring plan options, and has finally settled on a template provided by the FSC Cluster Group.

10 1.6.2 Date Recorded> 09 04 2008 Date Closed> 12/3/09

Observation:

It will be important to continue the explanation of FSC to stakeholders, particularly new people in the contract crews.

Follow-up evidence:

AD 36-A-03 of 53


Crews interviewed during the field visits understood the key points about FSC. The FSC pamphlet produced by the company is till in crew vehicles.

11 8.4.1 Date Recorded> 09 04 2008 Date Closed> 12/3/09

Observation:

It will be useful to continue adding to the Monitoring Plan template, noting those activities that are confidential and describing their frequency, reporting sequences and responsibility, to build a complete picture of monitoring activities.

Follow-up evidence:

The Monitoring Plan summary has been added to during the year. The process has been established to continue this over time.

12 7.4.1 Date Recorded> 12 May 2011 Date Closed>

Observation:

While the Estate Management Plan is reviewed regularly (annually). It will also be important to update the Management Plan summary document (available on the company website) as revisions of the Management Plan are undertaken.

Follow-up evidence:

13 8.3.3 Date Recorded> 12 April 2011 Date Closed>

Observation:

While a clear CoC process is in place and Hog Fuel from the forest is not currently sold as certified, it may be useful to use docket books for these sales which do not contain the NZ Forest Managers Promotional Use label, in order to prevent any confusion over the certification status of the material.

Follow-up evidence:

AD 36-A-03 of 53

13. RECORD OF STAKEHOLDER COMMENTS AND INTERVIEWS

Nr Comment Response

Main Evaluation

1 Forest Mangers perform quite poorly in terms of recreational and community interests. The East Taupo forests are completely closed to recreational hunters and the only access allowed to the public land behind them leaves one’s vehicle with a considerable risk of vandalism. From this I conclude that forest Managers is not engaging the local community especially the local hunting community in any meaningful way, along the lines required the FSC guidelines. Consequently they are not meeting their obligations to the local community.

NZDA and CORANZ would appreciate Forest Managers’ response as to why they do not engage with the local recreational hunting and harvesting community. We would be pleased to attend any subsequent meeting with Forest Manages to discuss this matter, mediated if necessary by SGS.

See also the comment in Submission 2. NZFM are caught between a section of the community’s desire for hunting access, and the land owners’ desire to use the land for the thousands of beneficial owners, many of whom are hunters. The obligations to the local community (in this case the beneficial owners) are being met.

2 Fish & Game New Zealand is a statutory

organization established under the

Conservation Act (1987) as amended by the Conservation Law Reform Act (1990). Fish & Game have a statutory function to: “manage, maintain, and enhance the sports fish and gamebird resource in the recreational interests of anglers and hunters”.

The Eastern Region represents the interests of more than 36000 anglers and 3900 hunters who purchase licences to fish or hunt in the Eastern Region.

Within the Taupo region the sport fishery is managed by the DoC. A fishing access agreement between the local iwi and the Crown is set down in legislation. Therefore, most environmental matters within the region are dealt with by DoC. Hunting of game birds within the Taupo region and surrounding forests is managed by the Eastern Region Fish and Game Council.

The central plateau region has healthy populations of both quail and pheasant. Pine forest provides good upland game habitat. Forests such as Kaingaroa are renowned as significant recreational hunting areas. The game bird season runs from the 1

st weekend

of May to the end of August.

We not that at present there is no provision for general public access or recreational game bird hunting within the Lake Taupo and

The attitude of the Trusts remains that the land & forests are for the use of the thousands of beneficial owners. Access to the State Forest Park through the forest is permitted.

AD 36-A-03 of 53

Nr Comment Response

Lake Rotoaira forests. The majority of these forests are privately owned and public access is not generally available but the provision of access to these forests for upland game hunters would provide social benefits for the wider community as identified within FSC principles. Access to streams and rivers within the forests for sport fishing has been extremely popular and well received by all parties, and provided benefits to the community through recreational opportunities and tourism. Hunting access would further increase these opportunities.

3 NZFM are a responsible company in all facets of the forest management, and employment of locals. They provide training for their harvesting crews.

No response required.

4 Overall NZFM is one of the best organised and managed forest companies that our transport company deals with.

NRR

5 From the Lake Taupo and Lake Rotoaira Forest Trusts’ perspective, we consider they are doing an exemplary job.

NRR

6. NZFM are well organised, proactive in technical aspects, very good environmental management and excellent at relationships with the community.

NRR

7 Roading and Harvesting operations have been carried out to achieve compliance with the relevant condition of resource consent and with attention to detail.

A protocol for managing archaeological sited is administered for both forests.

Fuel for forestry machinery was managed to prevent any discharge of hydrocarbons to perennial waterways.

Drainage works were in place and managed to prevent the direct discharge of silt in storm water drainage into perennial water bodies. Crossings of perennial watercourses are made via bridge or culvert crossings. Resource consents provide for these structures.

Disturbed sites are rehabilitated with both hard and soft works to prevent accelerated soil erosion. Harvested land is replanted in plantation trees. At some sites compartment boundary adjustments are carried out to provide an improvement in land use.

The patch work harvesting of forest compartments and large riparian margins adjacent streams, rivers and wetlands provide diverse habitat opportunities for flora and fauna.

NRR

8 The Wildfowlers Association represents shotgun hunters from around New Zealand.

See comments in relation to submissions 1 and 2.

AD 36-A-03 of 53

Nr Comment Response

Currently our 10 year old organization is based in Taupo. Part of the service we provide for our members is the negotiation of forestry access for the hunting of game birds in season. Waterfowl, pheasants and Californian quail are all resident within the large forestry areas surrounding Lake Taupo and its other lakes and waterways. WANZ access to all local forests has been possible with the exception of those managed by NZ Forest Managers. Approaches made by WANZ have been bluntly rebuffed by NZFM under the premise that the Tuwharetoa owners forbid any general access to all citizens other than the Tuwharetoa beneficial land owners of the blocks. Under the previous management by the NZ Forest Service historically, access was available.

Tuwharetoa owned land and forests form a barrier to access to the Kaimanawa Forest Park along with Government Departments, Corrections and Defence. Therefore huge tracks of land are not available for public recreation to the East and part of the South of the Lake Taupo hinterland. Legal access to the Kaimanawa Forest Park is restricted to three entry points two of which are either through or adjacent to Tuwharetoa holdings.

The Taupo region has long been a centre for hunting of all types with its adjacent National and Forest Parks and fishing lakes. Upland quail hunting was the best in New Zealand. Habitat destruction by various courses continues to adversely impact on these traditional sports with access issues equally a continual problem. Upland game hunting in particular has a very uncertain future in the Taupo area due to planned farm from forestry conversions of about 70,000 hectares of forest to our north west. Additionally the likelihood of substantial transfer of Kaingaroa Crown Land to Maori Tribunal Settlements means the probability of further restrictions.

The Trusts do indeed forbid general access to their lands, reserving the right for their beneficial owners.

Tuwharetoa have donated significant resources to the people of New Zealand, including Tongariro National Park.

The company notes that Wildfowlers have never approached NZFM regarding access to the forests.

9. The Taupo region has long been a centre for hunting of all types with its adjacent National and Forest Parks and fishing lakes. Upland quail hunting was the best in New Zealand. Habitat destruction by various courses continues to adversely impact on these traditional sports with access issues equally a continual problem. Upland game hunting in particular has a very uncertain future in the Taupo area due to planned farm from forestry conversions of about 70,000 hectares of forest to our north west. Additionally the likelihood of substantial transfer of Kaingaroa Crown Land to Maori Tribunal Settlements means the probability of further restrictions.

NZFM manages or assists forestry

AD 36-A-03 of 53

Nr Comment Response

management for a number of Tuwharetoa Trust lands including the lands surrounding the Hinemaia dams, Lake Rotongaio and Lake Rotoaira, all very important areas for game bird hunters. It is regrettable that such areas cannot be accessed, especially by responsible organizations with proven records of forestry usage and care. It should be remembered all game birds are the property of the crown and should be available for sporting purposes during the season on purchase of a license. WANZ would welcome the opportunity to discuss access issues with NZFM and Tuwharetoa. NZFM manages a very substantial portion of land in this area. Unlike the other large companies that have similar interests it appears to give little community imput to citizens. This may be a reflection of the introspective policies of the land owners but requires some consideration of its PR reputation.

10 Environmental and biodiversity comment:-

Use of pesticides and insecticides:

NZFM appears to follow current forest management practices.

Land preparation for replanting of exotic radiata pine involves significant applications of a potent mix of herbicides to suppress weed growth prior to planting. There is considerable concern that such treatments to the land results in altering biodiverse parts of the ecological systems vital to the food supplies and reproduction of game birds and other indigenous birds that are insectivores. The combination of no plant cover for 3 years and light pumice soils tends to promote erosion. Techniques to prevent runoff erosion into waterways around Lake Taupo have not always been adequate. However leaching of nitrogen and phosphates has been shown to be much less than either urban use or dairy farming. The considerable decline in Californian quail populations is thought to be partially due to the current methods of weed suppression. Little research had been done on the effects to invertebrate populations or to the leaching of herbicides and pesticides into waterways. The general use of 1080 as a pesticide in forestry, particularly its aerial distribution, is currently being reviewed as are other poisons. WANZ supports a policy which avoids the use of any aerial use of insecticides or pesticides until fully researched and proven to be environmentally safe. We do not currently believe 1080 fits this criteria.

AD 36-A-03 of 53

Nr Comment Response

Surveillance 1

1. NZFM rate very highly with DOL in terms of health and safety and comply with the Act in all respects. They have a sound approach to safety.

2. NZFM is performing their contract with the 2 Trusts satisfactorily.

3 NZFM fire suppression activities were conducted very well. The appropriate people were notified and the damage was confined to a small area.

4 (4 Logging Contractors)

NZFM is a good company to work for. They have kept production going through bad times as well as good; they keep their word; the supervisors visit regularly and show and interest in the actual operation as well as the results. The Company cares about the health and safety statistics.

5 (2 silvicultural crews). Very similar comments.

NZFM is actively assisting the contractors to attract and retain more people for crews as the silvicultural programme is being maintained.

Surveillance 2

NZFM is performing their contract with the 2 Trusts satisfactorily.

x

(3 Logging Contractors)

NZFM is a good company to work for. The supervisors visit regularly and know the operation. The trainer supplied by the company is good. The company has kept us informed of the current market conditions.

(2 silvicultural crews)

The audits carried out are very useful, especially when personal features to work on are added in. Crews appreciate being paid on the “Assessed work” basis.

NZFM supplied personnel to the contingent of fire fighters that went to assist in Victoria, Australia. This was appreciated by the Fire Service Commission.

Surveillance 3

NZFM is performing their contract with NRR

AD 36-A-03 of 53

Nr Comment Response

the Crown and the 2 Trusts satisfactorily.

Noted the continued co-operation of NZFM staff and contractors in achieving full compliance with consent conditions. The cooperation with the monitoring of Consent 110163 is appreciated.

The silvicultural contract crews again noted that the monthly audits carried out are fair and are very useful as all crew members become involved.

Harvesting contractors reported good conditions as production levels have increased. Safety continues to be a company priority. The company trainer is very welcome.

The cooperation with the rare species monitoring is appreciated.

Surveillance 4

1 We found NZ Forest Managers to be responsible land managers. In particular -

1. River set backs for planting and forestry operations are strictly adhered to.

2. Weed control and pest control is well coordinated with the Department where we are a neighbours and carried out to high environmental standards. In particular I note the contribution of NZFM's to control willows in the Rotoaira basin.

3. NZFM have protected indigenous forest within the areas they manage.


2 I have recently completed an environmental audit of compliance with resource consents that provide for vegetation removal and soil disturbance in both forests. This audit focused on consent conditions that required specific outcomes in the field as opposed to other conditions of these resource consents that require administrative and or compliance with technical documents. Sites visited included harvested land and active harvest sites within the previous 12 months.

An allocation of full compliance was awarded to harvesting and soil disturbance operations in the Rotoaira Forest. This means;

• All conditions that include limits or other direct controls on adverse effects have been complied with.

• A small number of minor technical non-compliances may have

Required remedial actions are being undertaken to address low priority non-compliances raised.

AD 36-A-03 of 53

Nr Comment Response

occurred.

The operations in forest were ground based harvesting on gentle to rolling land forms.

An allocation of high level of compliance was awarded to harvesting and soil disturbance operations in the L Taupo Forest. This means;

• There has been a low priority non-compliance; and/or

• There have been several low priority non-compliances.

The operations in this forest included ground based harvested land including tractor, skidder and shovel logging. Current operations involved road and landing construction and a swing yarder clear fell harvest operation.

This allocation resulted from the need to rehabilitate exposed soil adjacent one stub road and landing. Arrest accelerated soil erosion at one landing and stabilise sediment deposition from that erosion feature. Reconstruct water bars and or utilise logging slash to regulate storm water flow on specifically identified haul tracks.

As always during liaison with the staff and management of NZFM, they were very helpful, constructive and conducted themselves in a professional manner during the inspections.

3 NZ Forest Managers have for the past 12 years managed our Harvesting and Marketing and have performed exceedingly well. Their overall harvest management has been at the same high level, as they operate within Taupo and Rotoaira Forests as per their FSC requirements, despite the fact that we are not yet FSC certified.

The department recently went through the process of tendering the harvesting and marketing and NZFM were successful in being awarded the contract which runs for three years with a four year right of renewal.

I have nothing but high praise for all the staff that are involved with the department and will be utilising their staff in the process of the department seeking FSC certification.


4 I deal with the training organisation of some contractors working for NZFM. I have found them very good to deal with and supportive of improving contractor skills.

I was also seconded by NZFM to investigate a fatal accident in one of their contract crews. I am a trained accident investigator and H&S specialist. From the start they were open and


AD 36-A-03 of 53

Nr Comment Response

honest and showed very good old fashioned values and morals. There whole attitude to an event that had major legal implications was impressive and very refreshing. So much so, the Dept of Labour removed the threat of legal action at an early stage. They were a pleasure to work with and I rate them as the best forest company I have ever conducted an investigation for. I cannot speak highly enough of them.

As mentioned before I do some work with a couple of contractors employed by NZFM. One contractor that has recently started with them is so impressed he hopes they never get rid of him. He has found them extremely fair and honest. They encourage working relationships that are cooperative and not combative. Unusual in todays environment.

5 We have recently used the services of NZFM for a large aerial spraying programme within our estate. (3000ha) Although the operation did not go without incident what does set them apart from a lot of other operators is the way they managed an incident, efficiently, professionally with a positive outcome for all parties involved.

For that reason as well as the fact that you can rely on the highly experienced team within NZFM to get the best possible result, WPL will not hesitate to utilise their services again as well as recommend them to anybody in the future.


Although these spraying operations were undertaken outside of the certified estate, incident management practices were undertaken as per the NZFM’s Environmental Management System and appropriate actions have been taken.

6 -7

Land owners commented that they are very happy with the estate management practices undertaken by NZFM. Communication channels and reporting are well managed.

Beneficial owner’s needs are being met and Waahi Tapu sites are well managed/protected.


8 I am new to the role but there are no known non-compliance issues with NZ legislation.

NZFM staff are easy to deal with.


9 Interviewed staff are happy with working conditions.


10-14

NZ Forest Managers are easy to deal with on a day to day basis and are open to negotiation during planning and pricing.

Workers feel safe and are happy within their work.


AD 36-A-03 of 53

14. RECORD OF COMPLAINTS

Nr Detail

Complaint: Date Recorded > dd MMM yy

Insert detail of complaint. Do not provide any names

Objective evidence obtained:

Insert a brief summary of the process and any evidence obtained.

Close-out information: Date Closed > dd MMM yy

Insert the reasons for the close-out of the compliant and confirm that the complainant has been informed and accepted such.

SA 2010: No complaints have been received.

SA 2011: No complaints have been received with relation to the NZ Forest Managers Management of either

Lake Taupo or Lake Rotoaira Forests.

End of Public Summary

FOREST MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION REPORT - SGS · 2016-02-17 · FOREST MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION...

Documents

Transcript of FOREST MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION REPORT - SGS · 2016-02-17 · FOREST MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION...