FORENSIC CIVIL ENGINEERING
-
Upload
devesha-y-jog -
Category
Engineering
-
view
266 -
download
1
Transcript of FORENSIC CIVIL ENGINEERING
OUT LINE
Introduction
History
Investigation
Procedure
Qualification of forensic civil engineer
Photo Gallery
Case study
References
FORENSIC CIVIL ENGINEERING
2
Forensic civil engineering can be
considered to be “The investigation
of materials, products, structures or
components that fail or do not
operate or function as intended,
causing personal injury or damage
to property’’.
3
Bridge failures such as the Tay rail
bridge disaster of 1879 and the Dee
bridge disaster of 1847. Edmond
Locard (1877–1966) was a pioneer in
forensic science who formulated the
basic principle of forensic civil.
"Every contact leaves a trace". This
became known as Locard's "exchange
principle".EDMOND LOCARD
4
INVESTIGATION PROCEDURE
”Define” the failure.
Collect evidence.
Analyze the evidence.
The possible events that root causes for the failure.
Validate the hypothesis through structural analysis.
Arrive at a conclusion regarding the cause(s)
Prepare the final report.
5
QUALIFICATION OF A F.C.E
Technically competent
Detective
Articulate with good communication skills
Skilful in court
Ethical
7
METHODS OF F.C.E
EMPIRICAL METHODS
It contains testing of materials in laboratory
THEORITICAL METHODS
RCA----- Root Case Analysis
ECFC---- Event & Casual Factors Charting
MORT--- Management Oversight & Risk Tree
SSAI----- System Safety Accident Investigation
8
NDT METHODS1. Rebound Hammer test
2. Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity test
3. Cover meter test
4. Half-cell Potential Measurement test
5. Impact echo / pulse echo test
6. Ground Penetrating Radar test
SDT METHODS1. Concrete core test
2. Capo test
3. Windsor probe test
4. Load test
9
TOOLS (PHOTO GALLERY)
REBOUND HAMMER TEST U P V MACHINE
SCANNING OF REBARS MEASUREMENT OF CORROSION
10
MEASUREMENT OF DEFLECTION BY
DEFLECTO METER MEASUREMENT OF DEFLECTION BY
LVDT
LOAD TEST ON PSC DECK OF RAILWAY
BRIDGE EXTRACTION OF SMALLER CORE
SAMPLE FROM MEMBER
11
13
THE TACOMA NARROW BRIDGE Name : TACOMA NARROW BRIDGE
Location: Tacoma, Pierce County, Washington, USA
Start of construction: November 23, 1938
Opened for traffic: July 1, 1940
Traffic per day : 2480 Vehicles/Day
Failure of bridge: November 7, 1940
THE TACOMA NARROW BRIDGE
The famous slender suspension bridge
The third-longest bridge in the world
Total Structure Length 5,939 feet
Suspension Bridge Section 5,000 feet
Center Span 2,800 feet
Width (center-to-center): 39 feet
Withstood winds up to (192kmph)
14
FAILURE OF TACOMA BRIDGE
15
On November 7, 1940,
The bridge oscillated violently in a 42mph wind and was
literally turn apart and collapsed into Puget Sound.
INVESTIGATION REPORT ON TACOMA BRIDGE
It may best explained by Diane Vaughn,
while commenting on the Challenger Space Shuttle
explosion, described as “normalisation of deviance”
“The gradual acceptance of sequential minor
errors and failures accumulating and
culminating in a major catastrophe”
.
16
Slender suspension bridge in the world.
The designers also “forgot” the slender suspension bridge.
The solid plate girders supporting the bridge deck acted
barriers to wind flow below the deck, while the wind flowed
smoothly above, causing an aero dynamic uplift.
Soon the bridge started oscillating and grew in until finally the
deck structure ruptured and the bridge collapsed.
18
RESULTS ON TACOMA BRIDGE
19
SUMMARY Forensic Civil Engineering is the application of engineering sciences
to the investigation of failures or other performance problems.
A wide and multi-disciplinary field, requiring civil engineering
expertise and knowledge of legal procedures.
Forensic civil engineering deals with the investigation and
reconstruction of failures in infrastructures.
Engineers & managers need to have a aerial view of the process,
techniques, outcome reporting and legal aspects of forensic civil
engineering investigation
20
1. Task Committee on Guidelines for Failure Investigation, "Guidelines for
Failure Investigation", ASCE, 1989.
2. Christoph Kohl, Doreen Streicher, (2006) “Results of reconstructed and
fused NDT-data measured in the laboratory and on-site at bridges”, Cement
& Concrete Composites, 2006, pp.402-413. .
3. Krause M, Barmann R, Friedlinghaus R, Kretzschamar F, Kroggel O,
Langenberg K, Maierhofer Ch, Muller W, Neisecke J, Schickert M, Schmitz
V, Wiggenhauser H., and Wollbold F. (1997), Comparison of pulse echo
methods for testing concrete’ NDT& E International 4 (special issue), 1997,
pp. 195–204.
4. Maierhofer C. (2003) “Nondestructive Evaluation of Concrete Infrastructure
with Ground Penetrating Radar”, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering,
ASCE, May-June 2003, PP. 287-297.
5. Sansalone, M., and Carino, N. J. (1986) “Impact-Echo: A method for flaw
detection in concrete using transient stress waves”, NBSIR 86-3452,
National Bureau of Standards, Sept., 1986, 222 p.