Indiana DICKSONS - Bob and Donna Jean Ford Research Notes Nov
Ford foundation slide show nov, 2012
-
Upload
vail-miller -
Category
Documents
-
view
187 -
download
0
Transcript of Ford foundation slide show nov, 2012
How effective are public sector supply chains’ policies for rural
poverty reduction?
Phase 1: An econometric analysis of the effectiveness of supply chain public policy in promoting competitiveness and reducing poverty
Policy Framework
Law 811 9 Strategic Objectives
Decree 3800
Formalization
Res. 186 Planning Monitoring
Focus on Competitiveness
and Inclusion
• Technical Secretary• Competitive
Agreement• Annual Action Plan,
Follow-up • Regional Secretary• Competitive
Agreement• Annual Action Plan,
Follow-up
National Council
Regional Committee
Regional Committee
Regional Committee
Thematic Committees or
Tables
Technical Secretary
Structure of National Supply Chain Organizations
Policy Focus
Indicators• High Poverty
• High Rural Poverty
• Low Human Development
• Land Inequality
• Property Inequality
Number of Supply Chains by Department
Policy Focus
10 Chains Studied • Avocado• Rice• Cocoa• Rubber• Citrus
• Fique• Fruit• Guava• Mango • Plantain
Policy not well focused on populations with
most poverty, underdevelopment and
inequality.
Targeted Poverty Intervention Programs
Alianzas Productivas
MADR
Oportunidades Rurales MADR
MIDAS USAID
ADAM USAID
Not necessarily well focused, potentially due to program objectives
Policy Effectiveness
Yield growth as a function of political performance
Policy Improved Yield
Better Income
Reduced Poverty
Calculating the Institutional Strength Index (IFI)
Regional Committee
0: None1/3: Inactive2/3: Active, Infrequent1: Active, Regular
Regional Secretary
0: None1: Regional Secretary
Competitive Agreement
0: None1/3: In Progress2/3: Approved, Inactive1: Approved, Active
IFI ScoreScale: 0-3
Higher Score, Stronger Political
Presence
Policy Strength and Variability
Average IFI Score and Degree of Variability by Supply Chain
Average IFI ScoreAverage IFI Score Degree of Variability
Policy Strength by Region
Strong positive relationship between number of supply chains and variability
Unclear relationship between IFI and number of regional committees
How effective are public sector supply chains’ policies for rural
poverty reduction?
Phase 2: A meso-regional analysis of the implementation of supply chain policy to promote competitiveness and reduce poverty
Policy Implementation
Analyze the structure, function and results of policy implementation at the regional level in terms of:• Competitiveness• Governance• Equity • Social Inclusion • Poverty
Structured interviews with key representatives of three selected regional supply chains:
• Cocoa, Santander• Plantain, Quindio• Vegetables, Boyacá
Preliminary Findings Cacao, Santander
• Competitiveness: Improved production and yield; improved health, sanity, and maintenance of crops; lack of technical assistance
• Governance: Weak, unrepresentative strucuture; strong integration with national committee; variable support by local government
• Equity: Lack of negotiating power; stagnant market access; failure to exploit new market advantages
• Social Inclusion: Many small producers associated and represented in committee; training and education initiatives;
• Poverty: Improved production leads to better income; price fluctuation vulnerability; correspondence with poverty intervention programs
Preliminary Findings Vegetables, Boyaca
• Competitiveness: Improved production and yield; improved health, sanity, and maintenance of crops; limited spectrum
• Governance: Organized, inclusive structure; strong leadership; strong integration with national committee; under-representation of some sectors; lack of support by local government
• Equity: Improved negotiating power; improved market access; foreign/export markets identified; reduced intermediation
• Social Inclusion: Small producer associations very present and represented in committee; training and education initiatives; direct contact producer-comercializer
• Poverty: Limited Scope; price fluctuation vulnerability; limited correspondence with poverty intervention programs
Project Timeline
Phase 1: Econometric Study • May 2011- May 2012
Phase 2: Meso Study • May 2012- October 2012
Phase 3: Household Study• November 2012-September 2012