Food Justice Final

44
Regulating The Competition out of Business: The Real American Dream Nicholas Jay Aulston Food Justice March 11, 2010

description

dd

Transcript of Food Justice Final

Regulating The Competition out of Business: The Real American DreamNicholas Jay AulstonFood Justice March 11, 2010

Table of ContentsI.Prologue4II.In the Beginning There Was Food6III.Social Isolation8IV.Economic Isolation11V.Race and the Law13VI.Race and Policy15VII.The Face of Street Food Today17VIII. Why Its Not Just Economics21IX.Conclusion22

Appendix A: Street Food Links23Appendix B: How Start a Lunch Truck23Appendix C: Story about Customers Fighting for Their Lonchera24Appendix D: Health Department Violations25Appendix E: Health Requirements for Food Trucks25Appendix F: Costs to Purchase a Lonchero26Appendix G: Department of Health Inspection Form27

PrologueIts very, very difficult to make a living by selling on the streets, you do that when you dont have any other options, --Diego Cardoso[footnoteRef:1] [1: Estrada, G., Los Angeles Street Vendors Under Scrutiny, Eastern Group Publications New America Media, May 9, 2005]

Leaning over a steamy mist of boiling water makes you feel as though you are constantly sweating. Well, in actuality you are constantly sweating when working over a hot grill or stovetop for 14 hours. Anyone who has been a line cook, prep cook, chef, or dishwasher in a restaurant kitchen understands how stressful the pressure of the kitchen is on a daily basis. Working in a restaurant kitchen is not an easy or glamorous job. You arrive early to prep and clean, work an 8-10 hour shift, then you leave late after youve prepped and cleaned again. If you are the owner/manager/cook you have even more responsibilities. Balancing financial books, hiring/firing, making pay roll, buying/managing inventory, press/ads, etc. which conservatively adds 2-5 hours to your tense working day.

This 16-19 hour nerve-racking workday is why I chose to examine street food vendors. When these entrepreneurs are put out of business, I take it personally because I am at the University of California Los Angeles due to my parents efforts to break through systematic racism, the same way the vendors are trying to get through.

My mother had the chance to own her own restaurant only because of a connection with a bank Vice President at Amalgamated Bank of Chicago that connection that was forged by my father. When my parents were looking for a loan to start their business, lending institutions were unwilling to give business loans on the south side of Chicago. This area is a predominately African-American section of Chicago, and lending institutions cited crime, income, lack of home ownership and loan applicants general lack of understanding of how to run a business as reasons for denial of their loan applications. My parents went to every bank in the city because they believed in the restaurant they were trying to build with the loan and the neighborhood they were going to serve. My parents, like the vast majority of African American entrepreneurs looking to get a loan for a business on the south side in the 1970s, where no banks physically existed, were rejected for loans. It wasnt until my father made a connection with one of the few (my mother says he was the only one in the city) African-American VPs and secured a loan through him. My parents struggle to secure a loan points to the systematic disinvestment and economic segregation that minority business owners faced. This is the same issue facing the street food vendors in America today, over 30 years after my parents humiliating journey through discrimination.

Neighborhoods will never be able to stand on their own without investment. If a bank or investor cannot envision all the angles of risk in an investment they are not going to sink money into something when they are not sure of the margins. Ideally if outside investors cannot come up with the money would come from within the community. However, many inner city minority neighborhoods are not abundant in investable income. If banks and industry do not invest in these neighborhoods then those desirous of creating your own business must save for years or turn to the mafia, drug dealer, number runners, or family and friends to try and acquire the necessary funds.

We are now in the year 2010 and are witnessing similar patterns of lending discrimination when it comes to what hurdles street vendors face. In the most fundamental sense, when I look into the eyes of a street food vendor I see the same hunger my parent once had. These vendors truly represent the American Dream!

In the Beginning There Was Food

In Guns, Germs, & Steel, Jared Diamond artfully describes how humans have been trading food and eating habits for centuries. Tastes, crops, and cultures collided and morphed into what we experience as the global food scene. Here in the United States we are in a unique position when it comes to food availability and variety. Decades of immigration into the U.S. from every corner of the world have exponentially shifted and expanded the scope of available food in the U.S.

Over the past few decades waves of immigrants to the United States from Europe (Italy, Poland, Germany, Russia, France, Irish), Asia (India, China, Japan, Philippines, Korea), Latin America (Cuba, Mexico, Argentina, El Salvador), and Africa (Ethiopia, Ghana, Morocco, Senegal) brought their own food cultures and traditions with them. One tradition that most travelers have experienced is street food. All the countries listed above have some form of street fair, whether it comes from a vending machine, a street food mall, an open-air market or a transit stops, they have a culturally appropriate way of selling food on the streets. In that vein those immigrants to the U.S. brought with them this tradition or perhaps it was already here and they brought new cuisine to the market. Those that chose this route of self-employment, street vendor, had to stand all day and the profit for a street cart was never extremely high. However, many established immigrants turned to this type of work as a service to the recent immigrants from the same country; a slice of home in an unfamiliar place.

This tradition of street food has never disappeared. Many street food vendors end up saving enough money and establish a brick & mortar restaurant.[footnoteRef:2] Either way they serve as an economic anchor for the community. They are normally a social center too, since they will sell more food (and be most profitable) in locations with high foot traffic. However, in recent years this path towards the American Dream has been made more difficult because new laws and regulations have teamed up with enhanced enforcement of standing rules to make it harder to have a successful street food business. This perhaps would not be an issue if there were numerous avenues for low-income minority citizens to achieve the American Dream. [2: A stationary, traditional, sit-down restaurant or small shop. A non-mobile restaurant.]

It is my intention to demonstrate how; in general, the creation of social and economic isolation along with changes in laws and policies have created an atmosphere where it is increasingly more complicated for low-income minority citizens to reach the American Dream; as my parents did.

Social Isolationby the 1980's, the inner city was viewed as he site of severe concentrated poverty, social dislocation, and social isolation.[footnoteRef:3] [3: Calmore, John, Racialized Space and the Culture of Segregation: Hewing a Stone of Hope from a Mountain of Despair, The University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 143, No. 5, p. 1243, May, 1995]

It is extremely demanding to achieve the American Dream while being socially isolated from crucial resources. It is a rare person who is able to become successful as its been drawn-up without the support of society as a whole. Historical segregation has separated the U.S. into many categories. One of the most significant is race. Racial segregation has been the source of many problems facing the U.S., one of the most important being social disempowerment through isolation. This isolation manifests in various ways including systematic denial of access to capital and financial resources.

Many contend that it has been federal government-supported programs that are at the root of this social isolation. The Home Owners Loan Corporation (HOLC), which assisted citizens in refinancing loans, discriminated against African-American communities. Starting in the 1930s, HOLC perpetuated these discriminatory practices by establishing an evaluation tool that consistently showed high risk in communities with a concentration of African-Americans. Other American banks adopted these evaluation tools and continued the practice of redlining communities, not granting loans to these communities. The Federal Housing Administration (FHA) and the Veterans Administration and the loan programs they managed were a major reason for the rapid suburbanization of predominantly white homeowners after 1945. These federal agencies also used biased practices. The FHA recommended the use of restrictive covenants and segregation through the belief that neighborhood stability came though neighborhoods retaining a homogenous social and racial make-up. These types of programs enabled and encouraged white citizens to move away from ethnically-mixed neighborhoods. As a result, a new white privileged class emerged in America. In effect, these policies and agencies created alcoves of racially segregated neighborhoods. These types of neighborhoods were not created equal: one had socially-mobile, white home owners, while the other type had renters forced to deal with effects of disinvestment caused by government programs and those that could afford to leave. This affected cities nationwide during the 20th centuries and as a result, people of color primarily lived in central cities. Federally supported disinvestment in the central cities culminated in the housing acts of 1949 and 1954, which established federal funds to acquire slum properties and redevelop them.

Many have argued in planning and political science theories as well as in popular discourse, that desegregation will resolve many of the problems that face financially disempowered minority communities. This line of argument is analogous to wait til the white man comes and helps you story that weve seen so often in popular culture.[footnoteRef:4] The argument is that when the white people come back to these communities they will become vibrant, viable, and beautiful neighborhoods. [4: Major motion pictures such as Avatar, Dances With Wolves, The Last Samurai, Pocahontas, Dangerous Minds, etc. perpetuate and reinforce this argument.]

It is with this backdrop of social isolation that concentrations of minorities (in inner cities and rural areas) created their own social norms. More recent immigrants also created their social norms outside of the new white privileged class. However, it is these norms of this new class that are the accepted traits of society at large. It is difficult for ghetto dwellers to build self-esteem by satisfying the values and ideals of the larger society or to acquire prestige through socially accepted paths. Precisely because ghetto residents deem themselves failures by the broader standards of society, they evolve a parallel status system defined in opposition to the prevailing majority culture.[footnoteRef:5] [5: Alkon, Alison and Agyeman, Julian, The Food Justice Reader: Cultivating a Just Sustainability Introduction: The Food Movement as Polyculture]

If there is nothing in larger society that reflects the values that the community holds, then people from that smaller community are forced to retreat within into their community as to not loose their identity and to not be forced to compromisebecoming increasingly more isolated.

Its important to recognize that racial segregation persists in the United States because whites benefit from it.As social conditions in the nation's ghettos deteriorate, policies to promote desegregation become less popular politically, thereby making a resolution of the nation's crime problem that much more remote.[footnoteRef:6] Eliminating racial segregation---won't lead to equality as long as minority citizens continue to live under two different set of rules or context. [6: Alkon, Alison and Agyeman, Julian, The Food Justice Reader: Cultivating a Just Sustainability Introduction: The Food Movement as Polyculture]

Economic Isolationremoving poor [minorities] from job network and limiting their exposure to people with stable histories of work and family formation, isolates them from the mainstream of American society.[footnoteRef:7] [7: Wilson, The Truly Disadvantaged, Chicago: Aldine Atherton, p.20-62, 1970]

Physical and social isolation are not the only issues that street food vendors face on their path to obtaining the American Dream. The socially accepted mentality is that people in these socially isolated neighborhoods served by and for street food vendors have nothing to offer society at large. There is a perception, sometimes expressed explicitly, but often implicitly that people in these neighborhoods are all criminals and leeches living off government checks. This is in direct contrast, as everyone from these neighborhoods knows, that they are entrepreneurs, business owners, teachers, government employees, and perhaps most important, people with money who want to or are limited to purchasing local products. However, the way the investment game is played right now the latter group of citizens with good credit and full-time employment are overshadowed by their proximity to high-risk residents with bad credit, high crime rates, delinquent bill payers, high unemployment, and high default rates.

A teacher, police officer, or lawyer living in this neighborhood would have a hard time getting a loan. This same person living who in a more affluent neighborhood would get the loan, is effectively isolated from such opportunities because of the behavior of their neighbors. Lending institutions even monitor shifts in the racial make-up of the neighborhood and give this assessment: turnover from white to black, since most of the time this meant a drop in property values, not because blacks lived there, but because crime increased, schooled declined, and the public sphere was neglected.He [Glazer] concludes that black segregation will end when the black behavior that induces the [white] motives of resistance or avoidance is reduced[footnoteRef:8] This argument fall directly back into the problems that we found in section III (Social Isolation). It seems as though the social and economic issues that street food vendors face are circular. Could there be any relief from this cycle in the laws that guide us all? [8: Calmore, John, Racialized Space and the Culture of Segregation: Hewing a Stone of Hope from a Mountain of Despair, The University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 143 No. 5, May, 1995]

Race and the LawThe sin of racialism is that presumes that racial interests or racial identity exist somewhere outside of or prior to law and is merely reflected in subsequent legal decisions adverse to nonwhites.[footnoteRef:9] [9: Crenshaw, Kimberl, Neil Gotanda, Gary Peller, and Kendall Thomas. eds. Critical Race Theory: The Key Writings that Formed the Movement, New York: New Press, p.xxiv, 1995]

Laws have never been made in a vacuum. As much as the laws of this land are meant to be equal to all citizens, their enforcement has been proven to have adverse affects on certain parts of society more than others. When attempting to create laws that are colorblind the authors may not have been able to envision unintended consequences. The problem with colorblindness is that some of the most pressing issues of justice and equality in this country are the result of policies that are race-neutral on their face but discriminatory in practice.[footnoteRef:10] [10: Serwer, A., Color-blindness, Racism, and Disparate Impact, The Atlantic, July 3, 2009]

A. Serwer, a critic, of colorblindness, calls in to question the people who frame and create the regulations. Who is at the desk when the laws are actually being written and then put into effect? Do you believe that street food vendors attend those meetings? Do you believe that their lobby is able to argue on their behalf to make sure that no laws are passed that will harm the street food industry? The real question is who develops the laws and then who is affected?

In the case of street food, the standard is that white males have been the dominant presence in city halls and the courtrooms throughout America. This presence provides access and ability to set laws that perpetuate and reinforce their privilege. It is this line of reasoning that Amie Breeze Harper used to come to the conclusion that white people have enslave[d] those whose labor is necessary for this theft [of natural resources from the land]...they force[d] the remaining humans to live under the laws and moral code of the occupiers.[footnoteRef:11] The general idea is that when one group (of non-laborers) is able to develop laws without obstruction in their own interest, we end up with a system where the laborers will always have to live under laws that may not reflect their morals and code of conduct. Through legislation, everyone has to live by white laws. These laws are significant as well because they naturalized whiteness as the normative identity for citizenship. In the prerequisite cases, law establishes whiteness as American identity, and racism facilitates this naturalization.[footnoteRef:12] Through this reasoning, it is easy to see how she comes to her final conclusion: They inculcate future generations to forget their non-occupied past and to aspire to join the ranks of their occupiers, to actually join the degradation of [their bodies] and of the land base that was once theirs.[footnoteRef:13] [11: Harper, Amie Breeze. Book Chapter: Decolonizing the Diet, bell hooks and Nutritional Liberation for "At Risk" Youths Forthcoming article abstract for the book, bell hooks companion, SUNY press 2007 p.185] [12: Carbado, Devon, Racial Naturalization, p.637, 2005] [13: Harper, Amie Breeze. Book Chapter: Decolonizing the Diet, bell hooks and Nutritional Liberation for "At Risk" Youths Forthcoming article abstract for the book, bell hooks companion, SUNY press 2007 p.185]

It is important to understand how race has played a part in the creation of laws. Further, how these racialized laws perpetuate the authority by those who were, and are in control. Looking at the creation of laws and perpetuation of authority is important when considering the laws that currently govern street food and how these laws are used to subvert the best efforts of the larger minority small business owner population.

Race and PolicyAn institutional approach claims that racial and economic inequalities are built into the zoning ordinances, mortgage policies and other institutions and policies that determine how industries, human communities and goods and services come to exist in particular places[footnoteRef:14] [14: Alkon, Alison and Agyeman, Julian, The Food Justice Reader: Cultivating a Just Sustainability Introduction: The Food Movement as Polyculture]

Policy, city ordinances, and codes have a similar function as federal and state mandated laws. However, unlike laws, policies can change given public input and concern about what is going on in their neighborhood. Unlike laws policy makers can hold public negotiations about a given topic of concern. In the case of street food, vendors can be dragged into a debate by neighborhood leaders complaining that mobile vendors have repeatedly violated county health codes or ignored city zoning codes. They can make claims about vendors dumping grease and wastewater down alley manholes or making unauthorized connections into the city's sewer system. The reaction to a rising number of complaints differs between cities, but some cities will request the zoning administrator to research and explain what zoning laws said about mobile vendors.[footnoteRef:15] If the administrator is thoroughly influenced by the plaintiffs they can conclude that street food should not be allowed to do business but on a handful of days, which would effectively put the street food vendors out of business. [15: Lebow, E, Taco Hell, New Times, Phoenix, AZ, September 28, 2000,]

Similar to the laws that govern this land, some citizens are worried about being disenfranchised by policies made by the city, as in the situation above. If street food vendors dont have representation or an advocate that work on these issues then they might be victims of ordinances that require vendors to get a vending license from the city. The city would regulate how, where and when they could operate on private property. The new rules would also make it easier to shut down vendors who don't comply. Vendors, who now can stay open as late as they want, would have to turn off their lights and pull up their tables and chairs at 10 p.m. They could remain open, in the pitch dark, as takeout businesses until 2 a.m.[footnoteRef:16] [16: Ibid]

The city doesnt want to be seen as a body of government that devalues or squashes entrepreneurship in the city. However, the city is bowing to one constituency, those residents that loudly voice complaints about these businesses, and choosing to ignore the consequences of the policies. Instead of engaging and assisting these small, majority minority, business entrepreneurs to improve their businesses with training and education, they choose to try to use zoning and law enforcement to force them out of business.

Some cities are willing to put money into increased enforcement, hiring new inspectors, allowing them to cite vendors without having to wait for citizen complaints, and to send them into neighborhoods during the evening, when most of the vendor businesses operate. While other cities, like St. Paul/Minneapolis, embrace street food by untangling and rewriting an unruly jumble of city ordinances governing food carts. This acceptance of street food vendors by certain cities could be because population hegemony or the fact that they envision all street vendors as viable businesses. Either way it is important to delve into the current situation the street food vendors face in United States.

The Face of Street Food TodayAsked if regulations enacted in Houston were racist, David Mestemaker, an attorney who represented taco truck owners there, replied: Absolutely. It's a classic case of discrimination, because 95% of the people who own them are Hispanic.[footnoteRef:17] [17: Gottlieb, J., Taco trucks are feeling the crunch across the U.S. Los Angeles Time, LA, CA, May 20, 2009]

In order to understand the current climate of the street food debate the major players must be considered. The stakeholders considered for this paper are the customers, the brick and mortar restaurant owners, affected community members, and law enforcers, finally the vendor themselves.

The clientele for these outlets are as diverse as the population of the cities that they serve. In general they are people looking for a quick cheap meal or date, office workers on their lunch break, immigrants, laborers, gardeners, late night eaters, construction workers, government employees, nannies, and people on the move, janitors, parking attendants and locals. This clientele list seemingly includes everyone. Repeat customers come for the various reasons, but they become very loyal to these neighborhood food ambassadors. (Appendix C) The ever-growing customer base sometimes helps street vendors politically when enforcement of stricter city and county regulations made it more difficult or impossible to conduct business legally. There is an understanding from these customers that the vendors contribute to a high quality of life in their community. There were customers that were disgusted by any policy that was created or enforced that would tear at the fabric of their community by negatively affecting street food vendors.

The brick and mortar restaurants are concerned about competition and the bottom line of their business. Many of these owners fear the competition from the street food vendors. As one small business owner puts it, All of our permits and fees have gone up. We pay high rents, we pay high minimum wages. So anybody that parks a food van across the street from you and is competing with you has almost an unfair advantage.[footnoteRef:18] On the surface this seems like a valid argument about why the street vendors should be phased out through legislation. However, there are various issues to consider, as Matthew Cohen, a consultant to Eat Curbside and other vendors, states, its very tempting to see a mobile vendor with a line [waiting to buy food] and say, Those are my customers. But its probably not true. Its a different type of customer that will visit a mobile vendor versus one who will visit a traditional restaurant.[footnoteRef:19] As stated above, it is clear that the street food customer comes from all walks of life, but they are seeking an alternative to sitting down and having a meal. Many restaurant owners will say that the more options create a better economic environment. Concentration of options, as the theory goes, will bring more people more often. But some brick and mortar owners argue for protection of a product. Let's say you're a Pizza Luc. You're paying rent and paying taxes. Do you want Rick's Pizza out on the sidewalk in front of your restaurant?[footnoteRef:20] [18: Steinhauer J, Taco Truck Battle, Mild Angelenos Turn Hot, New York Times: Los Angeles Journal, May 3, 2008] [19: Ibid] [20: Nelson, R. Now seeking meals on wheels, Star Tribune Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN, March 4, 2010]

Many residents align themselves with the brick and mortar restaurant owners, but voice different concerns than economic competition. Various residents and neighborhood associations throughout the city [Phoenix] blamed street food vendors for attracting different sorts of lawbreakers, including prostitution, gangs, crime, drug dealing, littering and other indicators of social decay. The residents were requesting the city to clamp down on them.[footnoteRef:21] [21: Lebow, E, Taco Hell. New Times, Phoenix, AZ, September 28, 2000]

Ray Goodman [a white male], who supports [a] proposed new ordinance [that would effectively put street vendors out of business] complains, What's happened is these people have come in here and they've turned the neighborhood into a business. They're running businesses on their front lawns, back lawns, out of the houses. It turns the place into a mess. All we want the city to do is fix the mess.[footnoteRef:22] However, Susan Smith, a geographer, would argue the process by which residential location is taken as an index of the attitudes, values, behavioral inclinations and social norms of the kinds of people who are assumed to live [there]. Smiths statement helps to explain how there might be a misunderstanding between those who have living in a neighborhood for a long period of time and those that are moving in. It is hard for both sides of the situation to understand the others social norms. However, when laws are changed just to assuage the norms of one race, white, at the cost of another, the large Hispanic population that has moved into the neighborhood. [22: Ibid]

Some residents take exception to the notion that this attitude towards street food has anything to do with discrimination. One resident said, The people with the vendors like to say it's racism, but it's not. The issue is we want what's fair. That's basic. The issue is we buy homes. We invest time and money in them. And we don't want to see them or the neighborhood around them to continue to deteriorate the way this area has.[footnoteRef:23] This quote highlights that residents often confront vendors as if the vendor is not concerned about deterioration in the neighborhood. The assumption is the vendors arent homeowners, they dont invest in their homes, and they want the neighborhood to deteriorate. The question at hand was covered in Charles Murrays conclusion that, stereotypes, which include the idea that [minorities] are more prone to violence and crime than whites, are more likely to live off welfare, and are lazier and less moral than white, are founded on empirically accurate understandings about contemporary [minority] behavior compared to contemporary white behavior.[footnoteRef:24] [23: Ibid] [24: Calmore, John, Racialized Space and the Culture of Segregation: Hewing a Stone of Hope from a Mountain of Despair, The University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 143 No. 5, May, 1995]

Given the fact that some county officials say they are being pressured by residents who find the carts eyesores and some brick and mortar restaurant owners who feel undermined by the price-chopping ways of their mobile competition, they have taken some actions. Some have increased their enforcement efforts and hired more health inspectors in order to make sure that the street food vendors are operating up to code. The street vendors have noticed changes. Dan Darroch, the African-American owner of Hap's Real Pit BBQ [ran on a used car lot] said, "All of a sudden the sky was raining bureaucrats on us. He says he never had trouble until the west-siders began complaining about the taco vendors.[footnoteRef:25] This type of rapid enforcement or additional taxes is exactly what the business industry claims will bankrupt their business. Extra taxes, like healthcare for workers or additional equipment necessary for regulations levied by government officials, will break a business. So, why place this burden on those business owners who have the least? Perhaps a slow ease into these new fees and regulations may allow these street food vendors to adjust their business model to absorb the new costs and stay in business. However, many vendors, like Mr. Darroch, face a different situation, I look up one day and we've got maybe 15 city and county cars in the parking lot across the street and they're all coming at me with clipboards and pens. That's a real bad sign. Problem is, they can't find anything wrong. I think they found it a little bit embarrassing. So they left to write tickets out on the west side.[footnoteRef:26] From his perspective, Mr Darroch believes that the inspectors had come to pick his business apart. There doesnt seem to be much logic behind a city attempting to destroy the businesses of the small owners. Alma Williams, a Hispanic neighborhood activist, sums up the fact that the city is willing to enact reforms on this tiny issue but not on other blight violations in neighborhoods by stating, [it] just goes to show you that their fear of marching minorities is greater than their fear of neighborhood leaders.[footnoteRef:27] It does seem like an interesting prioritization. [25: Lebow, E, Taco Hell. New Times, Phoenix, AZ, September 28, 2000] [26: Ibid] [27: Ibid]

Why Its Not Just Economics

Some critics would argue that race has little to nothing to do with todays debate surrounding street food. They want the discussion about the policies and laws that surround street food to be about income and economics. Excluding race as the most important aspect of this debate would ignore two crucial factors: 1. The cultural history of street food and 2. The social and economic isolation that minorities have fought through in the U.S. If this is an issue of justice and creating an even playing field for all contestants to reach their American Dream then we cannot simply be colorblind. The guidance of Kimberl Crenshaw may shed a lot of wisdom concerning how a colorblind may never reach equality: "justice in a multicultural society is not subject to assimilation or colorblindness.[footnoteRef:28] [28: Crenshaw, Kimberl, Neil Gotanda, Gary Peller, and Kendall Thomas. eds. Critical Race Theory: The Key Writings that Formed the Movement. New York: New Press, 1995.]

Our approach attempted to consider both the economic and social issues at play around street food. We believe that racial inequality urges us to think beyond debates concerning the relative importance of race and class and to examine the multiple and complex intersections of racial and economic inequality. Overall, institutional approaches to racism demonstrate how race, in its intersection with class, often matters in far-reaching and complex ways that go well beyond instances of individual discrimination.[footnoteRef:29] [29: Alkon, Alison and Agyeman, Julian, The Food Justice Reader: Cultivating a Just Sustainability Introduction: The Food Movement as Polyculture]

ConclusionGovernment can regulate anyone out of business. They could create laws and taxes that cripple any industry.

We began this journey through street food by discussing the problems that our parents had in trying to achieve the American Dream. They were socially and economically isolated from the necessary resources to develop a business in the neighborhood they loved. That isolation was created by government policies that, perhaps unintentionally, caused hardship for many minority entrepreneurs. The effects of these decisions made by the government are still being felt in many communities.

We fundamentally find it abhorrent that any government would stifle small business growth, especially in neighborhoods that lack economic anchors, such as banks, supermarkets, universities, non fast food restaurants, business offices. They should be using there ever shrinking funds to assist these entrepreneurs to improve their business as an attempt to get more tax revenue.

My parents were only able to achieve their American Dream through bypassing a system that did not want them to succeed. It is extremely troublesome to witness the same racism today towards street vendors that simply want their chance at the American Dream.

Appendix A: Street Food Links

SF Street Food (on twitterone of the best resources for street food news)Seattle Taco Trucks (Seattle): http://www.lostacotrucks.com/seattle/Denver Taco Trucks (Colorado): http://denvertaco.blogspot.com/Taco Truck Tour (Ohio): http://www.columbusfoodie.com/2009/04/27/eventcolumbus-taco-truck-tour-09/comment-page-1/Taco Journalism (Texas): http://tacojournalism.blogspot.com/Taco Town (Texas): http://tacotown.org/Yum Tacos (Northern California): www.yumtacos.comCalifornia Taco Trucks (California):http://californiatacotrucks.com/blog/Great Taco Hunt (Los Angeles): www.dailytaco.orgLoaded Web Taco Truck Usage (Los Angeles area):http://us.loadedweb.com/blogs/tag/taco+truck.htmlhttp://www.cartcult.com/

Appendix B: How Start a Lunch Truck

Jason Edwards wrote a book describing the steps to getting a lunch truck business off the ground, including and teaching by using an actual business plan.[footnoteRef:30] [30: Chee, Morgan, Hermosillo, Jesus, and Joe, Lawrence, A Sectoral Analysis of the Loncheras Sub-Sector in Los Angeles County]

Appendix C: Story about Customers Fighting for Their Lonchera

In another example, Glenn recalled an incident over the summer relating to a lonchera operator who parked his vehicle in front of a hospital everyday throughout the night. The Los Angeles Police Department had received calls every day complaining about the presence of the lonchera. However, hospital employees that worked late nights loved the fact that the truck was parked in front of the hospital because there was no where else for them to eat within walking distance late at night. Eventually, Glenn said, the Asociacin and the police discovered that the source of all of the complaints was a single caller who apparently just didnt like the food truck in the area.[footnoteRef:31] [31: Taken from an interview with Erin Glenn in Chee, Morgan, Hermosillo, Jesus, and Joe, Lawrence, A Sectoral Analysis of the Loncheras Sub-Sector in Los Angeles County. UCLA School of Public Affairs/Dept. of Urban Planning, Fall 2009]

Appendix D: Health Department Violations

The Health Department can shutdown a business for any of the following violations:

Food preparation that is beyond the scope of the operation Lack of hot and/or cold running water Improper food temperatures Unpackaged foods offered for customer self-service, including pastries and food within a self- service warming oven Lack of proper dating on potentially hazardous foods offered for customer self-service Unlabeled or misbranded prepackaged foods offered for customer self-service Unsanitary conditions, including vermin infestations (flies, cockroaches, mice etc.). Sale of home prepared foods or foods from an unapproved source Discharge of wastewater onto the ground Operating without a valid Public Health Permit Inadequate mechanical refrigeration Lack of oyster tags and warning signs Repeated violations Interference in the performance of the duty of the Enforcement Officer Inability to warewash[footnoteRef:32] [32: City of Los Angeles Department of Public Health]

Appendix E: Health Requirements for Food Trucks

Health inspections of food trucks include the following:1. Trucks must be parked within 200 feet of a restroom that has running hot water, a toilet, a sink, soap and towels2. Owners need to prove they have access to the restroom3. Owners must prove they have access to a Health Department-approved commissary where they can wash and store their trucks.[footnoteRef:33] [33: Renaud, Jean-Paul. (2008, April, 14) Putting the brakes on East L.A.s taco trucks. Los Angeles Times ]

Appendix F: Costs to Purchase a Lonchero

Key capital investment: New catering truck: $60k $150k Used catering truck: $20k $50k Conditioning it for use: up to $45k For rent: $1000 to $3000 (per month)

Regulations, fees: Health license renewal (annual): $690 ($57.50 per month) Business department permit (annual): $168 ($14 per month) Tax registration certificate (quarterly): Varies, according to sales revenue California Sellers Permit: Free, but requires deposit against future taxes

Labor: One employee: $300 $600 weekly salary

Other costs (excluding supplies): Commissary: $200 weekly ($10,400 per year) Propane: $60 $120 weekly Gasoline: $60 $120 weekly[footnoteRef:34] [34: Chee, Morgan, Hermosillo, Jesus, and Joe, Lawrence, A Sectoral Analysis of the Loncheras Sub-Sector in Los Angeles County]

Appendix G: Department of Health Inspection Form[footnoteRef:35]Bibliography [35: City of Los Angeles Department of Public Health]

1. Alkon, Alison and Agyeman, Julian, The Food Justice Reader: Cultivating a Just Sustainability Introduction: The Food Movement as Polyculture2. Allain, A and Winarno, F.G. Street foods in developing countries: lessons from Asia. FAO3. Calmore, John, Racialized Space and the Culture of Segregation: Hewing a Stone of Hope from a Mountain of Despair, The University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 143 No. 5(May, 1995) p. 1233-12734. Carbado, Devon, Racial Naturalization (2005)5. Crenshaw, Kimberl, Neil Gotanda, Gary Peller, and Kendall Thomas. eds. Critical Race Theory: The Key Writings that Formed the Movement. New York: New Press, 1995.6. Chee, Morgan, Hermosillo, Jesus, and Joe, Lawrence, A Sectoral Analysis of the Loncheras Sub-Sector in Los Angeles County. UCLA School of Public Affairs/Dept. of Urban Planning, Fall 20097. Duggan, T. (2010 February 25) Coming to Terms With a Street Food Boom New York Times, NY Retrieved from: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/26/dining/26sfdine.html8. Dupuis, E. M. , 2006-08-10 "White Food: Milk, Race and the Politics of Perfection"Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Montreal Convention Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada Online. 2009-05-25 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p103230_index.html9. Eric K. Yamamoto & Jen-L. W. Lyman, Racializing Environmental Justice, 72 University of Colorado Law Review 311 (2001)10. Estrada, G. (2005, May 9) Los Angeles Street Vendors Under Scrutiny, Eastern Group Publications New America Media. Retrieved from: http://news.newamericamedia.org/news/view_article.html?article_id=d940ca8d120eb99c441e609b3e5a083b11. Gott, Leo. Critical Race Globalism Globalization or Global Subordination? How Lat-Crit Links the Local to Global and the Global to the Local Critical Race Globalism?: Global Political Economy, and the Intersections of Race, Nation, and Class Summer, 2000, 33 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 150312. Gottlieb, J. (2009, May 20) Taco trucks are feeling the crunch across the U.S. Los Angeles Time, LA, CA. Retrieved from: http://articles.latimes.com/2009/may/20/local/me-tacotrucks2013. Harper, Amie Breeze. Book Chapter: Decolonizing the Diet, bell hooks and Nutritional Liberation for "At Risk" Youths Forthcoming article abstract for the book, bell hooks companion, SUNY press 200714. Lebow, E (2000, September 28) Taco Hell. New Times, Phoenix, AZ. Retrieved from: http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/2000-09-28/news/taco-hell/15. Massey, Douglas and Denton, Nancy, American Apartheid, Harvard Univeristy Press, 199316. Nelson, R. (2010, March 4) Now seeking meals on wheels, Star Tribune Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN. Retrieved from: http://www.startribune.com/lifestyle/taste/86237807.html?elr=KArks7PYDiaK7DUqEiaDUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aUU17. Renaud, Jean-Paul, (2008, May 1) On a taco truck bandwagon Los Angeles Time, CA Retrieved from: http://articles.latimes.com/2008/may/01/local/me-tacos118. Said, Edward W. 1978 Orientalism / Edward W. Said Pantheon Books, New York19. Serwer, A. (2009, July 3) Color-blindness, Racism, and Disparate Impact, The Atlantic20. Steinhauer J, (2008, May 3) Taco Truck Battle, Mild Angelenos Turn Hot, New York Times: Los Angeles Journal, Retrieve from: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/03/us/03taco.html?_r=1&bl=%26ei=5087%26en=07a617cef516e341%26ex=1210219200%26pagewanted=print21. Stringer, Scott M. (Manhattan Borough President) Illegal Street Vending: The Unique Case of Ground Zero. October 200822. Willon, P. (2009, June 10) UCLA law students help truck operators overturn L.A. ordinance. L.A. Now (Los Angeles Times Blogs). Retrieved from: http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2009/06/ucla-law-students-help-taco-truck-operators-overturn-la-ordinance.html23. Wilson, The Truly Disadvantaged, p.20-62 (Chicago: Aldine, Atherton, 1970)

2