Food, Conservation, and Energy Act (FCEA) of 2008 Implications and Funding for the Southern Region...
-
Upload
dwain-smith -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
3
Transcript of Food, Conservation, and Energy Act (FCEA) of 2008 Implications and Funding for the Southern Region...
Food, Conservation, and Energy Act (FCEA) of 2008
Implications and Funding for the Southern Region
PLN, AEA, and ASRED MeetingOrlando, FL
L. Washington LyonsExecutive Administrator, AEA
andRonald A. Brown
Executive Director, ASRED
August 25, 2009
Presentation Format
Provide Background and Overview of FCEA
Focus Primarily on Title VII
Identify Implications and Funding for the Region
Respond to Questions
Farm Bill Titles Title I - Commodity Programs Title II - Conservation Title III - Trade Title IV - Nutrition Title V - Credit Title VI - Rural Development Title VII - Research and Related
Matters
Farm Bill Titles Cont. Title VIII - Forestry Title IX - Energy Title X - Horticulture and Organic
Ag Title XI - Livestock Title XII - Crop Insurance & Disaster
Assistance Programs Title XIII - Commodities Futures Title XIV - Miscellaneous Title XV - Trade and Tax Provisions
FCEA
Enacted into law on June 18, 2008 after being vetoed
CREATE-21 and the Farm Bill Committees
Most of the new authorizations and funding increases are in competitive programs
Elements of FCEA
Protecting Natural Resources Protecting the Environment Increasing Funding for Food Safety
and Nutrition Enhancing Food Security Emphasis on Biofuels and
Renewable Energy
Farm Bill Provisions All existing programs in the land-grant
system were reauthorized, including: Smith-Lever 1890 Extension Hatch Evans-Allen McIntire-Stennis Cooperative Forestry Animal Health
EFNEP-7116 EPFNEP is referred to in the bill as Nutrition Education
Increased the authorization to 90M per year
Provides minimum $100K per year to 1862 and 1890 institutions
Provides 10-15% increase to 1890s for appropriations above F.Y. 2007 level of ($63.538M) 2009 ($66.1M) 2010 (68.1M)
A revised formula was enacted for distribution of funds that impacted the 1862 institutions
It increased funding for some and decreased it for others The new formula was not related to the inclusion of
1890s as eligible institutions
Agriculture and Food Research Initiative (AFRI) 7406
National Research Initiative (NRI) and Initiative for Future Agriculture Food Systems (IFAFS) Authorities were combined to create AFRI Supports fundamental, applied, and
integrated research Standalone Extension and teaching projects Authorized at $700 Million per year
($201.5M) No matching requirements - unless it is
applied research that is commodity-specific and not of national scope
AFRI Priorities Areas Plant Health and Production and
Plant Products Animal Health and Production and
Animal Products Food Safety, Nutrition and Health Renewable Energy, Natural
Resources and Environment
AFRI Priority Areas Cont.
Agriculture Systems and Technology
Agriculture Economics and Rural Communities More than 40 different program areas Conference grants Special provisions for small, mid-
sized, and minority universities
2501 Program -14004 Outreach and Technical Assistance for Socially
Disadvantaged Farmers and Ranchers
Competitive grant program
Open to Universities, CBOs, and NGOs
Mandatory Funding: 2008 - $ 6.0M 2009 - $15M 2010-12 -
$20M
Awards limited to $100K per year
National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA)-7511
Proposed new structure in USDA/REE Improves visibility of research,
education, and Extension Replaces CSREES Research, Extension, and Education
authorities will be transferred to NIFA A director appointed by the President Director will serve a six-year term Reports to Secretary of Agriculture
Other Provisions 1890 Capacity Building Grants Program
expanded to include Extension - 7107 Authorized $25M Funding 2009 $15M
1890 Extension authorization increased to 20% of Smith-Lever – 7121
Smith- Lever 3(d) programs were reauthorized and changed from formula to competitive distribution
Funding 2009 IPM - $9.7M CYFAR - $8.1M
Implications New eligibilities provide more funding for the
region More opportunities for 1890 and 1862
universities to collaborate and partner AFRI provides opportunity for funding
Extension proposals as well as integrated Potential to increase the number of clients
being served in the region New federal agency created (NIFA) to raise the
visibility of Extension, research and education New funding will be in competitive programs
Competitive Programs
AFRI - $201.5M Extension only grants possible Integrated 30%
Water Quality - $12.6M Food Safety - $14.6M Regional Pest Mgt. Centers - $4.1M Others (~$25.5M)
Mandatory Programs
Organic Ag Res & Ext Initiative - $20M
BFRDP - $19M Biomass R and D - $28M Healthy Urban Food Enterprise
Development Center - $1M Specialty Crop Res Initiative - $50M
Five types of grants – •Standard R&E•CAPs•Regional Partnerships for Innovation•eXtension Projects (3; eXt RP)•R&E Planning Projects
Mandatory Programs
Outreach and Technical Assistance for Socially Disadvantaged Farmers and Ranchers - $20M
Ag Risk Management Education - $5M Biodiesel Fuel Education - $1M Community Foods Grants Program -
$5M
$598M Total; $30M – per award ceiling
Health Information Technology Extension Program: Regional
Centers
Health Information Technology Extension Program: Regional
Centers Cooperative Agreement Program Yr 1 - $189,000,000 September 8, 2009;
September 29, 2009; November 3, 2009 - Decision: December 11, 2009
Yr 2 - $225,000,000 December 22, 2009; January 19, 2010; March 2, 2010 - Decision: April 27, 2010
Yr 3 - $184,000,000 June 1, 2010; June 22, 2010; August 3, 2010 - Decision: September 28, 2010
Thank you for participating in our upcoming meeting, What Makes an Effective Regional Extension Center? - NCQA
The National Committee for Quality Assurance, a 501(c)(3), focusing on health care quality.
Other FCEA Titles Title II – Conservation – EQIP grants Title IV – Nutrition – SNAP-Ed --
$141.5M in FY08 Title VI – Rural Development (water,
waste disposal, child care, locally produced foods, technology transfer, energy efficiency, telemedicine, etc.)
Others DOE - $100M for grants that train
people to retrofit houses Broadband Technology Opportunities
Program (BTOP) - $4.7B $250M - encourage sustainable
adoption of broadband services $200M to upgrade technology and
capacity at public computing centers
Potential Others
Energy Extension Service Climate Extension Service Primary Health Care Extension
Service
Implications Related to Resource Development for
CES
Be more entrepreneurial Be more collaborative, yet agile Be more connected Honor our base, but embrace
innovation
Be More Entrepreneurial
Training in proposal writing Writing teams (state, regional) Proposal writing experts Complement overall broad
mission
Be More Collaborative, Yet Agile
Multistate, regional, national Across disciplines Outside traditional LG areas Take advantage of communications
technology; make prompt decisions Look for “how we can” rather than
“why we can’t”
Be More Connected State and national agencies
State agencies - Administrators, directors and PLs need a working relationship with heads of state agencies – Ag, HS, RD, etc.
National - Develop a working relationship with CSREES NPLs and other agencies; get on review panels, discuss needs
Honor our Base, but Embrace Innovation
Stick to mission, but look for new ways
Innovate, adopt new technologies; portray a modern CES
Work for formula and capacity AFRI ~$200M (~$60 Extension applicable) SL 3b/c ~$300M
be a modern CES