Fondo Cosmico di Microonde: implicazioni delle moderne...

112
Fondo Cosmico di Microonde: implicazioni delle moderne osservazioni, prospettive future Carlo Baccigalupi SISSA, Trieste Societa’ Italiana di Fisica Italiana September 23°, 2013

Transcript of Fondo Cosmico di Microonde: implicazioni delle moderne...

Fondo Cosmico di Microonde: implicazioni delle moderne osservazioni,

prospettive future Carlo Baccigalupi

SISSA, Trieste Societa’ Italiana di Fisica Italiana

September 23°, 2013

Outline

• CMB anisotropies in the new era:

– Effects from Large Scale Structure make the CMB a Dark Energy Probe

– Searching from Cosmological Gravitational Waves

• The status of observations as set by Planck

• Latest discoveries and future directions

CMB anisotropies

CMB: where and when?

• Opacity: λ = (neσT)-1 « horizon

• Decoupling: λ ≈ horizon

• Free streaming: λ » horizon

• Cosmological expansion, Thomson cross section and electron abundance conspire to activate decoupling about 380000 years after the Big Bang, at about 3000 K CMB photon temperature

A postcard from the big bang

• From the Stephan Boltzmann law, regions at high temperature should carry high density

• The latter is activated by perturbations which are intrinsic of the fluid as well as of spacetime

• Thus, the maps of the CMB temperature is a kind of snapshot of primordial cosmological perturbations

CMB physics: Boltzmann equation

d photons

= gravity + Compton scattering

dt

d baryons+leptons

= gravity + Compton scattering

dt

CMB physics: Boltzmann equation

d neutrinos = gravity + weak interaction dt

d dark matter = gravity + weak interaction (?) dt

gravity = photons + neutrinos + baryons + leptons + dark matter

CMB physics: gravity

CMB Physics: Compton scattering

• Compton scattering is anisotropic

• An anisotropic incident intensity determines a linear polarization in the outgoing radiation

• At decoupling that happens due to the finite width of last scattering and the cosmological local quadrupole

e-

CMB anisotropy: total intensity

+

+

CMB anisotropy: polarization

+

+

+

Gradient (E):

Curl (B):

Last scattering

Forming structures

LSS effects on CMB

? ?

?

? ?

? ? ?

Categories for LSS effects on CMB

• Re-scattering

• Gravitation

Categories for LSS effects on CMB

• Re-scattering

– Re-ionization

• Gravitation

– Time evolution of the metric tensor

– Deflection

CMB anisotropy: reionization

e-

e-

e-

Last scattering

Forming structures

Integrated Sachs-Wolfe

Sachs & Wolfe 1967

Last scattering

Forming structures

Integrated Sachs-Wolfe

Sachs & Wolfe 1967

Last scattering

Forming structures

Integrated Sachs-Wolfe

Sachs & Wolfe 1967

Last scattering

Forming structures

Integrated Sachs-Wolfe

Sachs & Wolfe 1967

H-1

Last scattering

Forming structures

Integrated Sachs-Wolfe

Sachs & Wolfe 1967

Last scattering

Forming structures - lenses

CMB lensing

Bartelmann, Schneider 2001, Hu 2000

T

Forming structures - lenses

E B

CMB lensing

Last scattering

Kamionkowski, Kosowsky & Stebbins, Zaldarriaga & Seljak1998

T Forming structures - lenses

E B

CMB lensing

acceleration

Last scattering

z

Energ

y d

ensity

104 0.5

dark energy

The promise of CMB lensing

z

Ener

gy d

en

sity

104 0.5

dark energy

The promise of CMB lensing

Dark energy matter equivalence

CMB last scattering

Matter radiation equivalence

103

Dark energy domination

z

Ener

gy d

en

sity

104 0.5

dark energy

The promise of CMB lensing

Dark energy matter equivalence

CMB last scattering

Matter radiation equivalence

103

Dark energy domination

Stru

ctu

re f

orm

atio

n

z

Energ

y d

ensity

104 0.5

dark energy

The promise of CMB lensing

z

Energ

y d

ensity

0.5

The promise of CMB lensing

1 1.5

z

Energ

y d

ensity

0.5

The promise of CMB lensing

dark energy

The promise of CMB lensing

• By geometry, the lensing cross section is non-zero at intermediate distances between source and observer

• In the case of CMB as a source, the lensing power peaks at about z=1

• Any lensing power in CMB anisotropy must be quite sensitive to the expansion rate at the onset of acceleration

Lensin

g p

robabili

ty

z 1

z

Energ

y d

ensity

0.5

The promise of CMB lensing

Le

nsin

g p

rob

ab

ility

1 1.5

z

Ener

gy d

en

sity

0.5

Lensing strength recording the cosmic density at the onset of acceleration

Len

sin

g p

rob

abili

ty

1 1.5

Cosmological constant

z

Ener

gy d

en

sity

0.5

Lensing strength recording the cosmic density at the onset of acceleration

Len

sin

g p

rob

abili

ty

1 1.5

Cosmological constant

dark energy

Anisotropies

T(θ,φ), Q(θ,φ), U(θ,φ), V(θ,φ)

X=T,E,B

X(θ,φ)=Σlm almX Ys

lm(θ,φ)

spherical

harmonics

s=0 for T, 2 for Q and U

E and B modes have opposite parity

Angular power spectrum

T(θ,φ), Q(θ,φ), U(θ,φ), V(θ,φ)

aXlm, X=T,E,B

Cl=Σm [(almX)(alm

Y)*]/(2l+1)

spherical

harmonics

information

compression

CMB angular power spectrum

Angle ≈ 200/l degrees

CMB angular power spectrum

Angle ≈ 200/l degrees

Primordial power

Gravitational waves

Acoustic oscillations

CMB angular power spectrum

Angle ≈ 200/l degrees

Primordial power

Gravitational waves

Acoustic oscillations

Reionization

Lensing

ISW

The status of observations as set by Planck

Planck

• Hardware: ~600 ME, third generation CMB probe, ESA medium size mission, NASA (JPL, Pasadena) contribution on cooling systems

• Low Frequency Instrument (LFI, Nazareno Mandolesi PI, instrument design and construction supervised by Marco Bersanelli) based on radiometer technology operating at three frequency channels, 30, 44, 70 GHz

• High Frequency Instrument (HFI, Jean-Loup Puget PI) based on bolometer technology, operating at 100, 143, 217, 353, 545 GHz

• About 16 years (1993-2009) of design and construction

The Planck focal plane

Planck detectors

Planck frequency coverage

Planck milestones

• May 14th, 2009, launch, the High Frequency Instrument (HFI, bolometers) is on

• June 1st, 2009, active cryogenic systems are turned on

• June 8th, 2009, the Low Frequency Instrument (LFI, radiometers), is turned on

• Summer 2009, Planck gets to L2, survey begins, 14 months

• 2 years of proprietary period and data analysis

• Mission extended! High frequency observations ended in early 2013, Low frequency observations ended this summer

• Early papers on extra-Galactic astrophysics, 2011

• Intermediate papers on extra-Galactic and Galactic astrophysics, 2012

• More astrophysics and first Cosmological Results based on total intensity, 2013

• Astrophysics and Cosmology results based on total intensity and polarization expected in 2014

Data flow and analysis levels

• Level 1, telemetry, timeline processing, calibration

• Level 2, map-making

• Level 3, multi-frequency analysis, production of Galactic, extra-Galactic and CMB science products

Mission Operation Center, Darmstadt

Trieste LFI timeline processing and map-making

Paris HFI timeline processing and map-making

Map exchange, separation of astrophysical foreground and backgrounds, Galactic, extra-Galactic astrophysics, CMB science

Planck contributors

Davies

Berkeley

Pasadena Rome

Helsinki

Copenhagen Brighton

Oviedo

Santander Padua

Bologna

Trieste Milan

Paris Toulouse

Oxford

Cambridge Munich

Heidelberg

Bucarest

Planck data processing sites

Trieste Paris

The Planck view of the sky

50

The Planck view of the baby Universe

51

Cosmic harmonics

52

A Dark Universe

53

The birth of Cosmic Structures I

• The Planck is the first single experiment mapping the Earliest cosmological structures from a few million to tens of billions light years

• The Statistical Distribution Spots on the CMB map tells us about the process which imprinted them, likely a short period of accelerated expansion, the Inflation, immediately after the Big Bang

• According to Planck, spots with smaller sizes are fainter than the ones which larger size, indicating a dynamics and an actual «end» of the Inflation

54

The birth of Cosmic Structures II

• The Planck capability of imaging the early Universe is unprecedented

• The Statistical Distribution Spots on the CMB map tells us about the process which imprinted them, likely a short period of accelerated expansion, the Inflation, immediately after the Big Bang

• According to Planck, spots follow the Gauss distribution, which means no «order» is detected in the generation of Cosmological Perturbations

• Ripercussions of this discovery are ongoing

55

Dark Lenses bending Light

56

The Dark Lenses as seen by Planck

57

Planck reveals Cosmic Light Bending

58

Early dark energy and CMB lensing

Acquaviva & Baccigalupi 2006

CMBreaking projection degeneracy

Acquaviva & Baccigalupi 2006

CMB lensing detection

Keisler et al. 2011

CMBroken degeneracy

Sherwin et al. 2011

CMBroken degeneracy

Van Engelen et al. 2012

Planck XV, 2013

A few questions…

Carlo Baccigalupi « Cosmology from Planck 2013"

65

• Can we know more about the Inflation?

• Can we know more about the Dark Cosmological Components?

• Are there challenges to the basic cosmological principles?

• What Planck and Cosmology can tell us in the near future?

Latest discoveries and future directions

The first evidence of lensing B modes

Hanson et al. 2013

The first evidence of lensing B modes

Hanson et al. 2013

Future directions

69

• Near future

– Sub-orbital experiments targeting lensing B modes

– Gradually extending fields to search for gravitational waves on the degree scale

• Far future

– The extreme early Universe: proposals for future CMB satellites

– Pushing CMB-LSS cross-correlation to its limits: Euclid

Upper bounds on B modes

Bischoff et al. 2011

B modes hunters

• See lambda.gsfc.nasa.gov for a full list of operation or planned experiments

• Forecasted performance from – LSPE

– EBEX

– PolarBear

COsmic oRigin Explorer

White paper: arxiv.org/abs/1102.2181

Satellites: Euclid, to fly in 2020

74

Next ESA selected Cosmology Satellite Mission Designed to study Dark Energy and Matter in Cosmological Structures

See the Euclid groups at ICTP, INAF-OATs, SISSA, UniTs. sci.esa.int/euclid

Concluding remarks

• Present and future lines for CMB exploitation: – Effects from the LSS for investigating the dark components – The extreme early Universe through the quest for

detecting Cosmological Gravitational Waves

• Intense observation campaigns are being carried out from sub-orbital probes as well as satellites, for both lines

• LSS effects have been detected, and being used to constrain the Dark Cosmological Components

• B modes from gravitational lensing have been detected • The quest for B modes from Cosmological Gravitational

Waves is in progress

Concluding remarks: Planck

76

• Planck confirms the existence of Dark Energy and Matter • Bending of Light as seen by Planck reveals Dark Lenses acting in the same epoch of the

accelerated cosmic expansion • Gravitational waves, if existing, are less than 10% of the density perturbations • Sum of mass of neutrino is less than 0.2 eV • The Dark Energy is a Cosmological Constant, within errors • Planck reveals that the «transient» energy driving inflation was actually dynamic, and

«decreasing» in time • Planck sees no «order» in the process which generated cosmological perturbations • Data Analysis still ongoing, published data concern less than half of the mission • 2014: Planck increases accuracy on the above results • 2014: Planck publishes polarization data, along with constraints on Cosmological

Gravitational Waves from large scales • 2014-2016: results from sub-orbitals came on-line with constraints on Cosmological

Gravitational Waves from the degree angular scale • Beyond: studies of cross-correlation of Planck CMB and Large Scale Structure make

progresses, heading to the next Cosmology ESA Satellite • Beyond: post-Planck CMB polarisation satellite

The scientific results that we present today are a product of the Planck Collaboration, including individuals from more than 100 scientific institutes in Europe, the USA and Canada

Planck is a project of the European Space Agency, with instruments provided by two scientific Consortia funded by ESA member states (in particular the lead countries: France and Italy) with contributions from NASA (USA), and telescope

reflectors provided in a collaboration between ESA and a scientific Consortium led and funded by Denmark.

CITA – ICAT

UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI

DI MILANO

ABabcdfghiejkl

Carlo Baccigalupi « Cosmology from Planck 2013"

77

Backup slides

Carlo Baccigalupi SISSA, Trieste

On behalf of the Planck collaboration

Trieste, time ordered data processing,

Component separation, cosmological parameters

Rome, GLS map-making, power spectra,

cosmological parameters

Bologna, beam reconstruction,

power spectra,

cosmological parameters

The LFI DPC

Helsinki, destriper map-making

Milano, calibration,

component separation

Berkeley, simulations

Padova, component separation

The Planck Data Processing Centre

Carlo Baccigalupi « Cosmology from Planck 2013"

80

A mini-Dark Energy course

Fighting the cosmological constant

Gµν=8πTµν

Fighting the cosmological constant

Gµν+Λg µν=8πTµν +Vgµν

geometry

quantum vacuum

Fighting the cosmological constant

Λ:???

Fighting the cosmological constant

Λ:???

V:M4Planck

???

Fighting the cosmological constant

Λ:???

V:M4Planck

???

|Λ-V|/M4Planck≲10

-123

Fighting the cosmological constant

Λ:???

V:M4Planck

???

|Λ-V|/M4Planck=10-123

percent precision

(Boh?)2

• Why so small with respect to any other known energy scale in physics?

• Why comparable to the matter energy density today?

z

Ener

gy d

en

sity

104 0.5

dark energy

Dark Energy

z

Ener

gy d

en

sity

104 0.5

cosmological constant

Dark Energy

Einstein 1916

z

Ener

gy d

en

sity

104 0.5

tracking quintessence

Dark Energy

Ratra & Peebles, 1988

z

Ener

gy d

en

sity

104 0.5

early quintessence

Dark Energy

Wetterich 1988

z

Ener

gy d

en

sity

104 0.5

Dark Energy

z

Ener

gy d

en

sity

104 0.5

dark energy

Parametrizing cosmic acceleration is …

ρ(z)

z

Ener

gy d

en

sity

104 0.5

…parametrizing cosmic density

ρ∝(1+z)3[1+w]

constant w

z

Ener

gy d

en

sity

104 0.5

Parametrizing cosmic density

ρ∝exp{3∫0z [1+w(z)]dz/(1+z)}

variable w

a=1/(1+z)

w

0.5 1

w=w0-wa(1-a)=w0+(1-a)(w∞-w0)

-1

w0

w∞

Chevallier & Polarski 2001, Linder 2003

Constraining Dark Energy: models

a=1/(1+z)

w

0.5 1

-1

Crittenden & Pogosian 2006, Dick et al. 2006,Said et al. 2013

Constraining Dark Energy: binning

Constraining Dark Energy: latest pre-Planck constraints

Said et al. 2013

Cosmological expansion and CMB: projection

D= H0-1

dz

[ΣiΩi(1+z)3(1+wi)]1/2 ∫ 0

z

w D

Cosmological expansion and CMB: Integrated Sachs-Wolfe

Cosmological friction for cosmological perturbations∝H

w ρ H

Integrated Sachs-Wolfe

Cosmological friction for cosmological perturbations∝H

w ρ H

Cross-correlating with LSS

Cross-correlating with LSS

Perturbation statistics and dynamics → early Universe

Cross-correlating with LSS

Geometry and perturbation dynamics → dark energy effects

ISW-LSS correlation detection

Fosalba, Gaztagnaga 2003 Padmanabhan et al. 2005

ISW-LSS impact on cosmology

Xia et al. 2010 Giannantonio et al. 2008

Planck XIX, 2013

Planck XIX, 2013

CMB lensing

Acquaviva et al. 2004

CMB lensing

Geometry Acquaviva et al. 2004

CMB lensing

Perturbation dynamics Acquaviva et al. 2004