Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015...
Transcript of Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015-08-14 · Dated: 1,2015...
Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and ordersfiled on the selected date. The documents are displayedin no particular order. However, all of these documentsare searchable.
To find a specific order, please use the Search/Findfunction within a PDF viewer.
1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f(Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac);
2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the formfield provided and press Enter or Return.
In most applications, the first appearance of the indexnumber, the word, or the phrase in the document will behighlighted.
Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications,including browsers and PDF viewers.
•. ,'A-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW .YORK "
COUNTY OF NEW YORK . • ,
t--„Xs. •»<,' •»; 'A 1h>:4 'ÿ If* '
. ' ,;>.v - ,ÿ,;,.;NYCALInRe: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONÿ V.WA.S. Partÿ
: (Mpulton, f)......——-------——— ------..... x '
This Document Relates To: : Tridex No.: 190254-14
CAROL KENARY as Administratrix for the Estate ofHUGHV. KENARY hnd CAROL KENARY,Individually, • ; "...
Plaintiffs,
against -
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS,CO., et al.Defendants.
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
x
WHEREFORE, defendant ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC;, by its attorneys
Harris Begch' • PLLGg". -hereby requests summary judgment ,in the above-entitled case,
pursuant to Civil Practice' Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint
against defendant ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL,.;INC. with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,ORDERED, that upon notice to allco-defendants,' all claims and cross claims against
defendant ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed
with prejudice and without costs..... - \
Dated: AaimHNew York, New York.
WEITZ Ja l.l XFMtKKG, P.C.Attorneys "for,Plaintiff1*1; r4700 Broadway,/. ; .:New York, NYH0OO3 vA .
(212) '558-5500 ' * - . '"
Robert A. Schaefer,lJKEsq.HARRIS BEACHPLLC
. Attorneys For DefendantArmstrong International, Inc.TQ0 WallStitetj 23rd Floor
: : New;York, NY 10005 -
<%x>%
. so ordered: l ?y/W/5~Hon. Peter Moulton, JTsTCT J
4U6o 72015NYS SOpREMi
part so£0URT . CIVli
ÿt' .j
..
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW'YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
InRe: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION" ::v-' •••"<?'
This Document Relates To:
PHILIP T. MCARDLE and KELLY MCARDLE,
Plaintiff(s),
- against -
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO, et al.
Defendants.
X' - v, "•
:NYCAL .
';: 'LA:S. PartlpÿS"ÿÿ : (Moulton, f.)
~X: Index No.: 190256/2014
. n t •
: NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY. JUDGMENT MOTIONAND: ORDER
r- X
WHEREFORE, defendant ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC., by its attorneys Harris
Beach PLLC, hereby, requ.ests ÿsumniary judgment in theyaboyeÿentilled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant
ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC.with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upoii notice to all- co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against,-T' V' ÿ.-•f ÿ
defendant ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC. be;and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Dated:New York, New York
Patti Burshtyn,Esq. V\'WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiff '
700 BroadwayNew York, NYJ0003..(212)344-5461
SOORDERED,Hon1. Peter Moulton, LS;Cp---p
ÿRobert A. Schaefer, flrJBsq:HARRIS;BEACHPELCAttorneys.For DefendantArmstrong International, Inc100 Wall Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005
AUG; 0 7 2015
PART 50nys SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
,/km
. '-i
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
AUGUSTO MANPARA, as Administrator for the Estate of.MICHELE MANDARa;:
Plaintiff(s),-against- Index No.: 190376/2014
AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC.,n/k/a RHONE POULENC AG COMPANY,n/k/a BAYER CROPSCIENCE INC.,
AMERICAN BILTRITE INC.,AMF BAKERY SYSTEMS,AZROCK INDUSTRIES,
A Division of DOMCO, INC.,BAKERS PERKINS,..INC.
Individually, and as Successor in interest toWerner Lehara, Inc., ,
BARI RESTAURANT & PIZZA EQUIPMENT,BLODGETT CORPORATION,
1
BORG-WARNER CORPORATION, ; ;
by its successor-in-interest, : ? TBORG-WARNER MORSE TEC, INC., ÿ
CBS CORPORATION, f/k/a VIACOM INC.,successor by merger toCBS CORPORATION, f/k/aWESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION,
DAP, INC.GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,GEORGIA PACIFIC-LLC, '
IMO INDUSTRIES, INC.,. :KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY; INC., ' :
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC.,UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION,MARSAL & SONS, INC.,THE MIDDLEBY CORPORATION,
Individually, and as Successor toMIDDLEBY MARSHALL INC.,
QCP, INC.,Individually, arid as Successor toBAKERS PRIDE OVEN COMPANY, INC,
AMF INC., INCORPORATED,
KÿA
yO
Defendants.
£ '
ÿ ,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, AMF AUTOMATION TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, (hereinafter
"Automation Technologies") hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled
case, pursuant to the Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs
Complaint against Automation Technologies, with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice of all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims
against Automation Technologies, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs to either party.
.JOSEPH VWLDER, ESQ./npe/&/Linneball, LLPftorrje/for Defendant,MF Automation Technologies, LLC
RIS ROMANELLI, ESQiitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Drneys for Plaintiffsgusto Mandara, as
SKRIS ROMANELLI, ESQ.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for PlaintiffsAugusto Mandara, asAdministrator for the Estate ofMichele Mandara700 BroadwayNew York, New York 1003Telephone No.: (212) 558-5500
403 Main at Court Street730 Brisbane BuildingBuffalo, New York 10203Telephone No.: (716) 853-6001
SO ORDERED:
HdfT Potor Moulten
HON.PETERH.MOULTON
2
SUPREME COURT.OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEAV YORK :
IN RE NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates To:
Cynthia Magill, Individually-and as Administratrix to the NO OPPOSITIONEstate of Otis Corthell . , . SUMMARY
JUDGMENTMOTIONAND
> Order'----:---------------------'----------------X ' ':
WHEREFORE, defendant CARRIER CORPORATION hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law. and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CARRIER CORPORATION withprejudice, and there being-no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims arid .cross claims againstdefendant CARRIER CORPORATION, be and the 'same-are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs. - ,,
Dated: C lS ÿNewXorkÿNY v. * /
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)
Index No: 1902 14/09
Nick Novack, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff ,
800 Third Avenue .•New York, NY 10022
'
Virginia Squitieri, Esq.WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ,EDELMAN& DICKER LLPAttorney for DefendantCARRIER CORPORATION150 East 42nd StreetNew York, NY 10017File No.: 10557.00602
c
SO ORDERED,
V%,vo*
Hon. Peter H. Moulton
69 15230v.1
Sty.
SUPREME
SUPREME.COURT OF THESTATEOF NEW YORK v AT > ACOUNTY OF NEW YORK A-"'. ÿ/ A .. - „IN RE NEW YORK COUNTY NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION . I.A.S. Part 50(Moultori)
This Document Relates To: Index No: 190011/09
Joanne Dyer, Individually and as Proposed Executrix of theEstate of Sam Gull
NO OPPOSITION• SUMMARY
JUDGMENTMOTIONANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant" CARRIER CORPORATION hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice "Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs' ÿ complaint against defendant CARRIER CORPORATION withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, thai upon notice to all co-defendants,-all claims and cross claims againstdefendant CARRIER CORPORATION, be "and the,.same are hereby dismissed wjth'prejudiceand without costs. . * ' ' . '
Dated: 7 / 11 )N.ew York,- NY
Nick Novack, Esq,.. , ÿ
j ;LEVY KONIGSBERG LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff.800 Third.Ayenue f t
New York, NY 10022vt"
SO ORDERED,
.6915242v.1
imia'Squitieri,- Esq.: WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOW1TZ,
- EDELMAN& DICKER LLP• .Attorney for Defendant
CARRIER CORPORATION150 East 42nd StreetNew York, NY 10017- File No.: 10557.00163
Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.
m 0)
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
*
IN RE NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
ÿ xThis Document Relates To:
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)
Index No: 190.406/10
Mark V. Slevin, as Executor of the Estate of Patrick T.Slevin • ...
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTIONANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CARRIER CORPORATION hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice.Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs', complaint against defendant CARRIER- CORPORATION withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, . . '
ORDERED-, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant CARRIER CORPORATION, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs. • . ,
Dated: SllMfNew York, NY
lick Novack, Esq. vLEVY KONIGSBERG LLP !Attorneys for Plaintiff , -800 Third AvenueNew York,' NY 10022 "
SO ORDERED, _Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.
69 15253v.1
Virginia Squitieri, Esq.,WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOW1TZ,EDELMAN & DICKER LLP -Attorney for DefendantCARRIER CORPORATION150 East 42hd StreetNew York, NY 10017File No:: 10557.00916
V*'<13US
m%%
• ff' W'ÿ / ÿ V
SUPREME COURt OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK : ; ÿ /
INRE: NEW YORK CITY iASBESTOS LITIGATION J .
' '
ELIZABETHWAYBOURN, as Executrix for the Estateof JOHN WAYBOURN, and ELIZABETHWAYBOURN, Individually,
Plaintiffs,-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et ah,
Defendants.
NYCALI.A.S. Part ?0(MouJton,$j
Index No. 190110/08
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDERAS TO DEFENDANTPEERLESS INDUSTRIES.INC.
WHEREFORE, defendant, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES,INC.,hereby requests summary
judgment inthe above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint,against defendant, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES,INC.,with prejudice inthis
action, and there being no pppositiort thereto, '
ORDERED that upon notice to all co-defendants,: all claims and crossclaims against
defendant PEERLESSINDUSTRIES,INC.,beandthe same are hereby dismissedwithprejudice
and without costs.
Dated: New-Yprk,New York
.Heather Janis Gaw,.Esq._ _Attorney for DefendantPeerless Industries,Iiic.LewisBrisboisBisgaard& Smith LLP77 Water Street, 21St Floor / -New York, New York 10005(212)232-1300 > . ' :
File No. 1863.16481 - .
SO ORDERED
ÿranlt 0/tijr, Esq.SW&MftCAftornÿror PlaintiffsElizabeth Waybourn, as Executrix for the Estate ofJohn Waybourn, and Elizabeth Waybourn,IndividuallyWeitz &Luxenberg,P.C.700 BroadwayNew York,- New York 10003(212) 558-5500
. Hon. Peter Moulton%Jl3jlS %
4846-9064-8357.1
t:C
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK'COUNTY OF NEW YORK
;ÿ ;?> V
InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION-'
Index No.: 190002/09
IRWIN GOODMAN,
Plairitiff(s),
- against -
AURORA PUMP,COMPANY, et al„
ÿ Defendants.
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION
WHEREFORE, Defendant AURORA PUMP "COMPANY hereby requests Summary
Judgment .'in the above-entitled case,,,pursuant to Civil Practice: Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing.plaintiff s complaint against Defendant Aurora Pump Company with prejudice, and
there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, alT'claiihs and cross claims against ..Defendant, AuroraPumjb Company be and the same/are hereby dismissed with prejudice arid
without costs to either party. ÿ
Dated: 1,2015New YorkvrNew:York
Ainbtil Long, Esq. ' -
LEVY,PHILLIPS& KONIGSBERGj LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff800 Third Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10003(212)605-6200. r
SO ORDERED, - ..
Jordan jrf: BeltzÿEsq.SEG#L McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAH6nEY,LTD.Attorneys for DefendantAurora;Purrip Cornpariy850 Third Avenue,,Suite 1100
New York, NY 10.022(212) 651-7500
vTvri. Peter H. Moulton
—_djpjts-.
t'ÿ
InrO
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK U '
InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATIONIndex No,: 190101/2012
NICHOLAS C. TAMBAKIS,
- against -
AURORA PUMP COMPANY, et al„
Plaintiff(s),
Defendants.
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION
WHEREFORE, Defendant AURORA PUMP COMPANY hereby requests Summary
Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Aurora Pump Company without prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, Aurora Pump Company be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and
without costs to either party.
Dated: .©«/HNew York, New York
,2015
Adam Dreksler, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 Broadway •
New York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
fordan D/Beltz, Esq.SEGAEMcCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for DefendantAurora Pump Company850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100
New York, NY 10022(212)651-7500
ÿÿon. Peter H. MoultonQ//?//S
\f .V'.yyy-y ÿ"
"ÿÿyr&''-y -n- " y yuft"- ••
. 'V'V ' 'ÿ v y;«
u"- .'ÿ '
i ?
:•
.ÿÿÿÿ''
'.O-
• V'ÿ/y ••y-.yVy ...
yyy "--yy -tv-<vvW VV
"
,:•'ÿ••V' .-.
.ÿ .yy.- " = • W-.
,.,v .;yy4 -v.- v- \ • . . ÿ :. -y- •."
ÿÿ ÿ -. ÿ•/HV . .... .. • y.:yy,.y: »
.•ÿ• -• .>•-ÿÿ y-ÿy'yV; . .yyyr-yyy::;
itvÿy-Y
yy - - ÿ
wv -\ .
JE-.C E 1 Wv Ei
AUG 1 1 2015
rÿ\
JSegal IWcCambridge Singer & Mahoney, Ltd
New York NY .ÿ
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK;
COUNTY OF NEW YORK----------------------—---L-------------------r--------------A-XINRE: NEW YORK CITY: .
':
ASBESTOS LITIGATION------------------—...................— .1—xThis Document Relates To: :
MARK V. SLEVIN, as Executor of the Estate ofPATRICK T SLEVIN,
NYCAL
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION
Plaintiff, .. .• ...-. against - !
A.W. CHESTERTON CO., INC., et al„
Defendants:
Index No.: 190406/10
WHEREFORE,1 defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY with, prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto, - ÿ
>
, ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all- claims and cross-claims againstdefendant, FORD MOTOR COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andWithout costs. .
Dated:
-4iyr-NictT5las~Noyack, Esq.LEVY, PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERG, LLP800 Third Avenue, 13th FloorNew York, New York 10022Counsel for PLAINTIFFS
SO ORDERED:
By: Adam L. Sandler, Esq.AARONSON RAPPAPORT FEINSTEIN &DEUTSCH, LLP '
Attorneys for Defendant ÿ
FordMotor Company600 Third Avenue
'.New York, New York 10016Tf 212-593ÿ,6700F:.212-593,ÿ6970 °OUa- *
SAfON. PETER H. MOULTbN
ÿ -(OI391371.DOCX ) ÿÿLSUpK£toiR? s0
HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN. DUNST8. DOUKAS. LLP- • | •
Attorneys at Law... . ÿÿ
48 Wajl Street;Suite> l[j.00New York, NY
SUPREME COURT OfvTRE STATE OF NEW YORK> ÿ
COUNTY OF NEW YOlv
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
JOSEPH AUKSTOLIS
against
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.'
I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, $)
INDEX NO.: 02r107003
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
11 New York, New York
JASON RIEMER, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Go.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005
SO ORDERED:
DANA NORTI ICRAFT, ESQ,WEITZ & LUXENBURG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff(s),Joseph Aukstolis700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
CJLdtVÿVLWO
Honorabe Peter H. Mou ton
weBAU!> 1220K
HOAGLAND. L'ONGO,MORAfo.-.DUNST& DOU]<As, LLPAttorneys at.Law~\48 Wall Street-Suite ill00NewÿVork, ny-
supreme COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
JOSEPH AUKSTOLIS
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.
Defendant(s).
Index No.: 02-107003
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
Kristen M. Mehr, being duly sworn deposes and says I am an employee of Hoagland,
Longo, Moran, Dunst & Doukas, LLP, the attorneys for Defendant* Kohler Co.
That on the ÿÿfdav of August, 2015 a copy of the within executed No Opposition
Summary Judgment Motion and Order was mailed, via first ciass to: Matthew Maclntyre, Esq.,
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C., 700 Broadway, New York, NY 10003 and one copy to the following
attorneys on the attached service list by first-class mail, postage prepaid.
I hereby certify that the foregoing statements made by me are true. I am aware that if
any of the foregojng statements made by me are willfully,false, Iam subject to punishment:
SERVICE RIDER
See attached.
HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORAN, DUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant, Kohler Co:
KRISTEN M. MEHR
Sworn to before me thisAugust, 2015
is day of
PUBLIC
alesandra l.FARRELLNOTARYPUBLICCFNEWJERSEYMyCommission B$res 1Qf1Sÿ01g
AUKSTOLIS COUNSEL LIST
John J. Fanning, Esq.Cullen and Dykman, LLP44 Wall Street .New York, NY 10005
Suzanne Halbardier, Esq.Barry,McTieman& MooreTwo Rector Street, 14thFloorNew York, NY 10006
Jennifer Darger, Esq.Darger Errante Yavitz & Blau, LLP116 E. 27th St, 12thFloorNew York, NY'10016-8942
Daniel McNamara, Esq.DeCicco, Gibbons & McNamara, P.C.232 MadisonAvenue, Room 1409New York, NY 10016 ~
MichaelA. Cerussi, Esq.Cerussi & SpringOne NorthBroadway, Suite 1011White Plains,NY 10601
William F.Mueller, Esq.Clemente Mueller222 Ridgedale AvePO Box 1296Morristown,NJ07962-1296
Thomas Maimone, Esq.Maimone & Associates, PLLC150HavenAvenuePort Washington, NY 11050
William J. Bradley, Esq.Malaby & Bradley, LLC150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, NY 10038
Philip Goldstein, Esq.McGuireWoods, LLP1345 Avenue of the Americas, 7th FloorNew York, NY 10105-0106
LoringFenton, Esq.Greenberg Traurig, LLPMet LifeBuilding200 Park Avenue, 15thFl.New York, NY 10166
Abbie Fuchs, Esq.Harris Beach, LLP100 Wall Street,,23rdFloorNew York, NY 10005
DanielMoretti, Esq.Landman Corsi Ballaine & Ford, PC1Gateway Center, Suite 400Newark,NJ07102-5311
Joseph G. Colao, Esq.Leader & Berkon, LLP630 Third Avenue, 17thFloorNew York, NY 10017
Scott R. Emery, Esq.LynchDaskalEmery,LLP264 West 40th StreetNew York, NY 10018
DonaldR. Pugliese, Esq.McDermott,Will & Emery340 MadisonAvenue, 17thFloorNew York, NY 10173-1922
Nancy McDonald, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP1300 Mount Kemble AvenuePO Box 2075Morristown,NJ07962-2075
Linda Yassky, Esq.SNR DentonUS, LLP1221 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10020-1089"
LisaM. Pascarella, Esq.Pascarella, DiVita, Lindenbaum &
Tomaszewski, PLLC2137 Route 35, Suite 290Holmdel,NJ07733
Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Sedgwick LLPOne Newark Center1085 RaymondBlvd., 16thFloor 4(/r\Newark,NJ07102-5311
/
%
ÿ
Page 2f *
Anna M. DiLonardo, Esq.Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman &
Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville,NY 11747
James S. Montano, Esq.McCullough, Ginsberg, Montano & Partners122 East 42nd Street, Suite 3505New York, NY 10168
Linda J. Clark, Esq.Hiscock & Barclay, LLP - Albany80 State StreetAlbany, NY 12207 x-
Anthony J. Marino, Esq.Garrity, Graham,.Murphy, Garofalo & Flinn,
72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350PO Box 438East Hanover,NJ07936
William E. Vita, Esq.Westerman Ball Ederer Miller & Scharfstein,
LLP ,
1201 RXR PlazaUniondale,NY 11556
Shehzad Hasan, Esq.Steptoe & Johnson1114Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10036
Laura B. Hollman, Esq.McGivney & Kluger,PC80 Broad Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10004
John Ronca, Jr., Esq.Ronca, Hanley, Nolan& Zaremba, LLP29 NorthfieldAvenueSuite2West Orange, NJ07052-5358
Paul Scrudato, Esq.Schiff Hardin& Waite LLP666 FifthAvenue, Suite 1700 *
New York. NY 10103
EdwardWilbraham, Esq.Wilbraham, Lawler & Buba140 Broadway, 46th FloorNew York, NY 10005
Erik DiMarco, Esq.Wilson, Elser,Moskowitz, Edelman& Dicker150 East 42nd StreetNew York, NY 10017-5639
MichaelB. Sena, Esq.Herzfeld& Rubin, P.C. .125 Broad StNew York, NY 10004
KirstenKneis, Esq.K&LGates, LLP599 LexingtonAvenueNew York, NY 10022
Mr. LeonardF.LesserSimon Lesser355 LexingtonAvenue, 10thFloorNew York, NY 10017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE NEW.YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
LEONARD JOSEPH BIGAJ and LINDA BIGAI,
Plaintiffs,
A.C. and S., INC. et.al., including,MORSE-DIESELINTERNATIONAL, INC.,
, Defendants,
NYCAL. I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, ft)
Index No. 115015/98
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, Defendant Morse Diesel, Inc. (incorrectly named herein as "Morse-Diesel
International, Inc."),hereby requests summary judgment in.theUbbverentitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs! complainLagainst defendant Morse Diesel,
Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,' ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
Morse Diesel, Inc.,be and the. same are hereby dismissed withprejudice and without costs.
Dated: New Yfork, New York • . '
.,2015
eeteeo, Esq.fcmdaa
WEITJZ/& LUXENBERG,PC.Attorneysfor PlaintiffsLeonardJoseph BigajandLinda Bigaj700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
SO ORDERED,
tnSr Rosario Chetta, Esq.MALABY& BRADLEY,LLCAttorneysfor. Defendant :
Morse Diesel, Inc.150 Broadway, Suite 600 .New York, New York 10038(212) 791-0285
Dated:on. Peter H. Moulton
ms_
m
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
-x
INRE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part
-x
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: Index No. 109974/06
ANDREW PAULNO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
•x
WHEREFORE, Defendant Morse Diesel, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs
complaint against defendant Morse Diesel, Inc.,with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendant Morse Diesel, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Rosario Chetta, Esq,MALABY & BRA!Attorneysfor Defent
SuzanneAA Ratoliffe, Esq. ;ÿWEITZ &/LUXENBERG, PC.Attorneys/for Plaintiffs)
Rosario Chetta, Esq.MALABY & BRADLEY,LLOAttorneysfor DefendantMorse Diesel, Inc.Andrew Paul
700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
150 Broadway, Suite 600 * .New York, New York 10038 Cq. ÿ6(212) 791-0285
SO ORDERED;tÿHon. Peter H. Moulton :
Dated:
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK .
INRE NEW YORK CITY, ASBESTOS LITIGATION
CAROL J. RIEGER;.Individually and as Executrix forthe Estate of WILLIAM K.RIEGER,
NYCALI.A,S. Part 50(Moulton, lP)
-x .
Index No. 113324/01
Plaintiffs,
A.C. and S., INC.et al.;, including, MORSE DIESEL,INC.,
" ;:r•
' . '
Defendants,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREEOE£;-Defehdant Morse Diesel, Inc., hereby.requesfs-surnmary judgment inthe
above-entitled caseÿpursuant to.Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant Morse Diesel, Inc.,with prejudice, and.there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED1, tnat upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
Morse Diesel, Inc., be;arid.|ne same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New Yqrkÿ.New York .'ty/D A 2015
Michael Fanelli, Esqÿ. •• - .
~
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PC.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs'CarolJ. Rieger, Individually andas Executrixfor the Estate of William K. Rieger700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500 rff ÿ
SO ORDERED, _:dÿdÿPeter H'. Moulton
Rosario Chetta, Esq.MALABY & BRADLEY,LLCAttorneysfor DefendantMorse.Diesel, Inc.150 Broadway,.Suite 600New York, Ne\y York 10038(212) 791-0285
•Dated:
... ÿ:$ ÿ
j' • > * "i.?4 • ff
I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE:NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITiGATION- xThis Document Relates To:
NYCAL , ÿ
I.A.S. Part S*d(Hon. Sherry Klein Ilcitlor)—HON.PETERH.MOUJLTONIndexNo(s).: 190137-10
NO-OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
GENNARO AZZARONE, as Administrator ofthe Estate ofNICOLAAZZARONE, deceased,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
ALLIS CHALMERS CORPORATIONPRODUCTLIABILITY TRUST, et al.,
Defendants.-...._x
WHEREFORE, defendant .CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, ' pursuant to Civil Practice- Law and' Rules' Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being noi .
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants,,all claims and cross,claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the -same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: . &0\*5"
htrtaÿNovack, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG,LLPAttorneys for Plaintifffs).800 Third Avenue, 11 Floor,New York, NY 10022(212) 605-6200
Kirstejf Alford Kneis, Esq.K&j/GATES LLP
forneys for DefendaniCRANE CO.599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030(212)536-3900 .
4(JGfNly
$0*01$
SO ORDERED, ;wg©
AUG 13 1015
ÿy-KleiivHeiller*RH.MOUETON
LÿsoPReÿsot COURT CIVIL
OhciTHON.PETERH
y°40ÿ
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF;NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK -
INRE:NEW.YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION................--------—-—- ---x "
This Document Relates'To:
.CYNTHIA MAGILL, Individually and asAdministratrix to the Estate ofOTISCORTHELL,
Plaintiffs),ÿ &
ÿ; -against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTSCOMPANY, etal.',
NYCALI.A.S. Part £>£>
IndexNo(s):: 1902ls4-09N
NO-OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE; defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case,; -pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto, .
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE GO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated:ork, New Yor
H--Audrey m.-Raphael, Esq!LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLPAttorneys for Plaihtiffis)800 Third Avenue, 11ÿ FloorNew York, NY 10022(212)605-6200 .
SO ORDERED,
«
KirstenAlford Kneis, Esq.K&ybATES LLP.Attorneys for DefendantCRANE CO.
Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030(212)536-3900
MainHntlrrHON.PETERH.MOULTON
m
AUS It,C°<%yC(c *015
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OE'NEW YORK •
INRE:NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION/------------—---—————- ——xThis Document Relates To:
CYNTHIA MAGILL,Individually and asAdministratrix to theEstate of OTISCORTHELL, \:?r
/Plaintiffs),
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS .COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants.
NYCALI.A.S. Part jKf S 6
loBr-Sliciiy ICluinHeiller)—PETERH.MOULTON
Index No(s).: 190214-09 .
NO-OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
---------------------........—— —- -xWHEREFORE; defendant CRANE PUMPS & SYSTEMS, INC. hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law.and Rules Section
3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE PUMPS & SYSTEMS, INC.
with prejudice, and there being'no opposition thereto, " .
ORDERED, that ,upon notice to all Co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE PUMPS SYSTEMS, INC. be, arid the same are hereby, dismissed with
prejudice and without costs. ; ••/•/'"
Dated:
Audrcy-Mv-Raphael,LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiffs)800 Third Avenue, 1PFloorNew York, NY 10022(212) 605-6200
*/ ;
(—ilc- vtotAs
KirstenAlford Krieis, EscÿK&I/GATES LLP ,
Attorneys for DeferiÿfitÿNE PUMPS & SYSTEMS, INC
599 LexingtonAvenueNewYork,NY 10022-6030(212) 536-3900
SO ORDERED,-HOrt. ShettylQcinlicitlci--hon.peterh.moulton
WISow 0
coir
AUG t /
c°ÿryc 5
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF,NEW.YORK : YY T ' » .Y
INRE: NEW -YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION ;
-xThis Document Relates To:
MILTON 0. KARLÿIndividually and asAdministrator of the Estate of IRWINGOODMAN, Y y
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
ABEX CORPORATION, et al„
"Defendants.
. NYCALI.A.S.Par
' Index No.: 190002-09
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE PUMPS & SYSTEMS, INC. hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section
3212, dismissingjplaintiffs' complaint against.defendant CRANE PUMPS & SYSTEMS, INC.
with prejudice, and there bemg no opposition thereto, .*
ORDERED, that uporr notice to all co-defendants; all. claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE PUMPS & SYSTEMS, INC. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with
prejudice and without' costs.
Dated:
—Amber Lung, Esq.LEVY KON1GSBERG, LLPAttorneys for Plaiiit iff(s) V. \
800 Third Avenue,. 1-1 FloorNew York, NY 10022 .
(21.2) 605-620.0 .Y ' Y' Y .
ÿ \ cjAoi_A*> ÿ
Kirste/Alford Kneis, EsK&I/GATES LLP ÿ'
Attorneys for-DefendvNE PUMPS & SYSTEMS, INC.
599 Lexington Avenue . - .•
New York, NY 10022-6030(212) 536-3900
SO ORDERED,VUou. Peter Mbulto'm •
hon.peterh.moultom AUG J 32015
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK . . .
INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION......i—.......--- --———- xThis Document RelatesTo:
JOANNE DYER,Individually and as ProposedExecutrix of the Estate of SAM GULL,
Plaintiff(s),
-against- •
AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
NYCAL.I.A.S. Part>0' cÿoCHon. Shcrrv Klein Hoitlor) —-HON.petMh-moWonIndex No(s).: 190011-09
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE,: defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled ease, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against ÿdefendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and them being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that updn notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed,with prejudice and without costs.
Dated:
atrick TimmincfEsq,LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff(s)800 Third Avenue,J 1th FloorNew York, NY 10022(212) 605-6200|OlcÿV-Aov-A'S ÿ-ÿ£>
HcAjLlAKirsteh Alford Kneis,K&l/GATES LLPAttorneys for Defen€ant
vNE CO.599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030(212) 536-3900,
SO ORDERED,TTon Sherry K.lr;" •
HON.PETERH.MOULTON
sOiDWibAUG 13 2015
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
Co, ÿ6°u"ryc,- %
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE:NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION- — —- x
This Document Relates To:
JUDITH KALLESTENOAKLEY, Individuallyand as Administrator of the Estate of SPENCEROAKLEY,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
ANCHOR PACKINGCOMPANY, et al.,
Defendants.
NYCALI.A.S.Partÿ <T2)(Hon. Sherry KleinIloitlor-)HON.PETERH.MOULTONIndexNo(s).: 190131-09
NO-OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO: be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: 7ÿ 3-2015-
Brendan J. TuHyrEsqrLEVY KONIGSBERG, LLPAttorneys for Plaintifffs)800 Third Avenue, 11 FloorNew York, NY 10022(212)605-6200 ;
KirstenAlford Kneis, EsiK&LjGATES LLPAttorneys for Defend;CRANE CO.599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030(212) 536-3900
coufo
<Hry •%AOS 1i
SO ORDERED,. -Shnrry Klein Heitler.
HmPETERH.MOULTON
vf/j/ts KIEOEIIVEDAUG 13 2015
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
/C£
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK '.V
INRE: NEW YORK-CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION- ---—. ...."XThis DocumentRelates To: : .
JUDITH KALLESTENOAKLEY, Individually .;
and as Administrator of the Estate of SPENCER : NYCALOAKLEY,
\; Plaintiff(s),
-against-
ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY; et al.,
Defendants.
I.A.S.Partÿ(Hon. SheayiCIeia Ileiliei)
Index No(s).; 190.131-09
NO-OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE PUMPS & SYSTEMS, INC. hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Ldw and Rules Section..
3212, dismissing plaintiffs'-complaint against defendant CRANE PUMPS & SYSTEMS, INC."J r
' '
' , - "
with prejudice, and there being.no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE PUMPS & SYSTEMS, INC. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.- • '* 7
Datedi.
lan.J. Tully, EsqrLEVY KONIGSBERG,LLPAttorneys for Plaintifffs)800 Third Avenvie, li® FloorNew York,<NY 10022' —(212)605-6200
SO ORDERED, .
%
KirstenAlford Kneis,K&I/GATES LLPAttorneys for DefeÿSantCRANEPUMPS SYSTEMS, 14 pm?599 Lexington Avenue 'VC)ÿ ®New York, NY 10022-6030 ,ÿK'sn(212)536-3900 ÿ
ÿ. Shorry KleinHeitler .
HON.PETERH.MOULTONV Vj,'.-
AUG 13 2015
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK - >
INRE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION———.......—-—----—---------— X
This Document Relates To:
ESTHER SHEMBERG, Individually and asExecutrix for the Estate ofZEV SHEMBERG,'
C Plaintiff(s),
ÿ -againstv
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTSCOMPANY, et al.,
'Defendants.
NYCALI.A.S. Part# S#(H«n. Shuiy KleinHeiLlei)HON.PBTJERH.MOULTONIndex No(s): 190221-10
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
- .......7—- - X
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO- hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to' Civil Practice Lav/ 'and Rules Section 3212; dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with, prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE.CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismisseO'with prejudice and without costs!'
Dated: 3cX5~/York
tfduuJl-BfendaTrJTTulTyrEsqr —ÿ
LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff(s)800 Third Avenue; .! 1th FloorNew York, NY 10022 "
•
(2 12) 605-6200
SO ORDERED,_
Kirsten/AlfordKneis, EsqK&LjGATES LLPAttorneys for DefendjtfftClUNECp. '
599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030(212)536-3900.
Hon. Sherry Klein Ilcitlcr -HON.PETERH.MOULTON
ow k "IC$
SUPREME COURT
SUPREME COURT OF-THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK •
;
INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION-—.......--7-.....——7—7-.-.....--- xThis Document Relates To: .
'
NYCAL *I.A.S. PartÿT(Hoiii Sharry KINÿ
HON.PETERH.MOULTONIndex No(s).-: 190406-10-
NO-OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
MARK V. SLEVIN, as Executor of the Estate ofPATRICK T'.SLEVIN,
. : Plaintiffs),
ÿ -against-
A. W. CHESTERTON CO., INC.,et al, .
Defendants.- —- — x
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO., on behalf of named Defendants CRANE CO.
and DEMING PUMPS (hereinafter "CRANE CO."), hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law.' and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with /prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants/ all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated:
ffilca V. Cesare>7-Es€LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLP .
Attorneys for Plaintiffs)800 Third Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022(212) 605-6200
ÿ(-VoL-Ars
SOORDERED,
XAuAKirsten Alford.Kneis,
K&JL GATES LLPAttorneys for DefepCRANE CO. CQ 4(Jq599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030'(212) 536-3900
Hon Sh"|J/3//S
HON.PETERH.MOULTON
ÿmecourt
,X.ÿÿ ;'v •
p X; • .
NYCAt v
I.A.S. Partÿ(Hdn.Shesry Klein Ilcitlcr)wQN.PETERH.MOULTONIndex No(s).: 190406-10
:
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
U.A
SUPREME COURT OF.THE STATE OF NEW YORK • , X -X .COUNTY OF NEW YORK . .
. ;'*Xÿ
INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This DocumentRelates To: *;
MARK V. SLEVIN, as Executor of the Estate ofPATRICK T. SLEVIN, "X
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
A. W. CHESTERTON CO., INC., et al.,
' Defendants.———................— . X * ' *
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE PUMPS & SYSTEMS, INC. hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section
3212, dismissing plaintiff s complaint against defendant CRANE PUMPS & SYSTEMS, INC.
with prejudice, arid there being no opposition thereto, ÿ '
ORDERED, that upon notice to all- co-defendants, all claims, ahd cross" claims against
defendant CRANE PUMPS & SYSTEMS, INC..be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: nwsH- ÿ.2015"
: p< .>•.CSclIUj C/oLj:"—
LEVY KON1GSBERG, LLP .
Attorneys for Plairitiff(s)800 Third Avenue, 1ll- Floor.'New York, NY 10022(212)605-6200
Kirston Alford KneisK&Z GATES LLPAjiwrneys for DeferiOantCRANE PUMPS & SYSTEMS, INC.599 Lexington Avenue. ' ÿ6 iNew York, NY 10022-6030 UNry $ 2/)tf(312) 536.3900 ÿ U'*
SO ORDERED, ., ÿb*ÿ-Shouy Klein Hciljer—tÿfeERaMOUlTON
$ 131/5
.... x, .
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK -V "
INRE: NEW YORK,CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates To:
EVELYNB. SMITH, Individually and asPersonal Representative of the Estate ofJAMES RICHARD SMITH,
Plaintiff(s), .
-against-
A.W. CHESTERTON CO, INC.,et al,
Defendants. »:
NYCALI.A.S.Partÿ S&(Hon. Sherry KleinHoitlHON.PETERH.MOULIndex No(s).: 190115-10
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case,, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs', complaint against ' defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, arid there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. bej arid the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: 7rk.New York
KiamerUEsqLEVY KONIGSBERG, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff(s)800 Third Avenue, IT1 FloorNew York, NY 10022(212) '605-6200 •?.
Alford Kneis,K&L GATES LLP
ttorneys for DefÿCrane co.599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030(212) 536-3900
/
SO ORDERED,jÿirGlieny Klein Heltler
HON.PBTERH.MOULTON
t/a/zs~
j>n
4ÿÿ, 0/Saw
SUPREME COURT
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK /
INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION.....- xThis Document Relates To:
EVELYNB. SMITH, Individually and asPersonal Representative of the Estate ofJAMES RICHARD SMITH;
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
A.W. CHESTERTON CO., INC.,et al.,
Defendants.
NYCALI.A.S. Partner'(Hon. Gliciiy Klein,
HON.!Index No(s).: 190115-10
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE PUMPS & SYSTEMS, INC. hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section
3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE PUMPS & SYSTEMS, INC.
with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, . *
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE PUMPS, & SYSTEMS, INC. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: u#i "=)2015"
James M. Kramer, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiffls)800 Third Avenue, 11' FloorNew York, NY 10022(212) 605-6200 ;
AKirsten Alford Kneis, Esq.K&L GATES LLPAttorneys for Defenda:CRANE PUMPS & SYSTEMS, I££.599 LexingtonAvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030(212)536-3900
SO ORDERED,Sherry KleinHettlerT-
HON.PETERH.MOULTON
f/ÿj?//SNYS
sOEDWiAUG 1-3 2015
PART 50SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
ÿif..;.-.--''' a/ -7;%-ÿ"
• - I-V :fiS' "-.ÿV ÿ:ÿ
;F:> i;
SUPREME COURT.OF THE STATE OFNEW YORK V "" • *COUNTY OFNEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK.CITYasbestos Litigation
•-xV;: NYCAL
KEVINBARRETT and IRENE BARRETT,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
0WENS-ILLINOIS INC.,et al.,
Defendants.
-X: . IndexNos.: 109675/99: 111053/98
113279/97: 103674/97
: NO OPPOSITION: SUMMARY JUDGMENT: MOTION AM>()ltl)KH
: Hon:Peter H. Moulton,: IAS Part 50
- - ........----— X
WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company hereby
requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs'; complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that/upon notice to all co-defendants,; all claims and cross-claims
against The GoodyearTire & Rubber Company be and the same are hereby dismissed
with prejudice and without costs.
WEITZ.& LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Phaii Alvarado, Esq:'ÿ/2
700'Broadway (
New York, New York.10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED:
LYNCHDASKALEMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant The Goodyear Tire& Rubber Company
Lawrence Lee, E
264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018(212) 710-0057 V
Ion. Peter H.Moulton, J.S.C;
..m
AUG 13/015
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
r'\ :=V-_ ÿ
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNfY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
xThis Document Relates To:
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)
Index No: 190406/10.
Mark V. Slevin, as Executor of the Estate of Patrick T.Slev in
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER '
WHEREFORE, defendant FEDERAL-MOGUL ASBESTOS PERSONAL INJURYTRUST, AS SUCCESSOR TO FELT PRODUCTS MFG CO. hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs', complaint against: defendant FEDERAL-MOGUL ASBESTOSPERSONAL INJURY TRUST, AS SUCCESSOR TO FELT PRODUCTS MFG. CO. withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, .
ORDERED, that upon ,notice to all co-defendants', all claims and cross claims againstdefendant FEDERAL-MOGUL ASBESTOS PERSONAL INJURY TRUST, ASSUCCESSOR TO FELT PRODUCTS MFG. CO., be and the same are hereby dismissed withprejudice and without costs. '
Dated:York, NY
lick Novack, Esq. . .
LEVY KONIGSBERG LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff800 Third AvenueNew York, NY 10022
Armand Kalfayan, Esq.WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ,EDELMAN& DICKER LLPAttorney for DefendantFEDERAL-MOGUL ASBESTOSPERSONAL INJURY TRUST,SUCCESSOR TO FELTPRODUCTS MFG. CO.150 East 42nd Str
, New'York, NYFile No.:.11120,
SO ORDERED,
6915450v.l
on. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK .
COUNTY OF NEW YORK /ÿ/<• .f'r-
IN RE NEW YORK COUNTY VASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates To:
NYCAL- 'I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)
Index No: 190103/10
Peter Sciarabba, as Executor of the Estate of KathleenRoslyn Sciarabba.,r .
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTIONANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant MCCORD CORPORATION hereby requests . summaryjudgment in the 'above-entitled case, pursuant to Civii Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant MCCORD CORPORATION with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto, ÿ '
. ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant MCCORD CORPORATION, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without cdsts: ÿ
Dated: %/1 / ISNew York, NY •
lick Novack,EsqVLEVY KONIGSBERG LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff800 Third Avenue . \New York, NY/10022 . '
SO ORDERED• y/C-_.ÿHoh:;Petpr,H. Moulton, J.S.C;
6915453v.l
;u; . .
Armand Kalfayan, Esq.WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ,EDELMAN & DICKER LLPAttorney for Defendant .AccordCorporation150 East 42nd StreetNew York, NY 10017FileNo.: 06507.01342
?// $//s
c°oJ0e'iW.
SUPREME
' •' 1 ' -' ÿ
' ' '•' '•"ÿ'• ÿ "jZ-T'T
SUPREME GOyRT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF1NEW YORK
INRE NEW Y6RK .CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A S, Parted"5"0
This Document Relates.To: Index No: 190392/12
John W, Adler and Elaine Adler
x
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTIONANDORDER
WHEREFORE, ' defendant FEDERAL-MOGUL ASBESTOS PERSONALINJURY TRUST, as successor to FELT PRODUCTS MFG. CO. (FEL-PRO),hereby requestÿ summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules • Section 321*2, dismissing plaintiffs'; complaint against defendantFEDERAL-MOGUL ASBESTOS PERSONAL INJURY TRUST, as successor toFELT,PRODUCTS MFG. CO.,,with prejudice, and'there-being no opppsition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst defendant FEDERAL-MOGUL ASBESTOS PERSONAL INJURY TRUST,as successor to FELT PRODUCTS MFG. CO., be and the same are hereby dismissedwith prejudice.and without costs.
Dated: V / l& j / $
Amber R. Long, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG LLPAttorney for Plaintiff •
800 Third Avenue ÿ "
New York, NY 10022
so
6622396v.1
<c- v/ -Heth-Shcrry K. IIcTtitr'
Arniand Kalfayan, Esq.WILSON, ELSER. MOSKOWITZ,edelman& Dicker llpAttorneyfor.DefendantFederaLMogul Asbestos PersonalInjury Trust, as successor to FelÿsProducts Mfg. Go.150 East 42nd StreetNew York, NY 10.0 17FileNo. 11120.00133
m/s
.MOULTON
- • ;
** .
*-:l . -/v *. <ÿ -> :-vr
-'y *ÿ*. \ 'I
m
SUPREME COURT
3. ÿ:ÿ
'My.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE NEty..YQRK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates To:
NYCAL.I.A.S,Part(Heitjer, J.)
Index No: 190392/12
John W;Adler and Elaine AdlerNO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTIONANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant .FEDERAL-MOGUL ASBESTOS PERSONALINJURY TRUST, as successor to the VELLUMOID DIVISION OF FEDERAL-MOGUL CORPORATION, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitledcase, pursuant to, Civil Practice- Law and Rules Section 3212,. dismissing plaintiffs'complaint against defendant FEDERAL-MOGUL ASBESTOS PERSONAL INJURYTRUST, as successor to the VELLUMOID DIVISION OF FEDERAL-MOGULCORPORATION, with prejudice, and there being no oppo'sition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst defendant FEDERAL-MOGUL ASBESTOS PERSONAL INJURY TRUST,as successor, to the VELLUMOID DIVISION OF FEDERAL-MOGULCORPORATION, be and, the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and withoutcosts. '
/
Dated:
Amber-LEVY KONiGSBERG LL?Attorney for Plaintiff800 Third AvenueNew York, NY 10022
SO ORDERED, .
6622401v.l . ;
WILSON, ELSER. MOSKOWITZ,EDELMAN <&OlCKER LLPAttorney for DefendantFederal-Mogul Asbestos PersonalInjury Trust, as successor to theVeiiumoid Division of Federal-Mogul Gdrporation150 fiasf42nd StreetNew York, NY 10017File'Noi11121.00026
. rT-Iyii*.iSlim$Lk:.' HelUt;i,:
HONiPCTERMMOULTON
- %..-V
m
' :>r. ~ - --v., -;: v;v. .. >'.?ÿ; * _' .i
:f ' "•
'V -v
.SUPREME COURT OF THE.STATE OF.NEW YORK-COUNTY OF NEW YORK
"
INRENEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates To:
ÿx
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)
Index No: 190079/15
Frank GondarNO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant TEXACO INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaintagainst defendant TEXACO INC.,with prejudice, and there beingmo opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that tipon hoticetd all co-defendants, all claims arid cross claims against defendantTEXACO INC.,Jbe and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: ii.N rk,NY - ' '
Jordan FoBELLUCAttorneys546 FifthNew Yorl<
• Jx, LLPlaintiff
hue, 4th FloorY j 0036 : ;
•.w
SO ORDERED, .
Uxm. Peter.I-I. Moulton
6862359v. 1
Armand'Khlfayan, Esq.WILSON, ELSER, MOSKQWITZ,EDELMAN & .DICKER LLPAttorney for DefendantTrXACO INC. c ,
loO East 42nd StreetNew.York, NY 10017: • .FileNot: 01042.00353
AUG 13Of
SUPREME COURT OFTHE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK ' "
INRENEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates To:
Frank Gondars
. *ÿ "
•
x ,
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moultbn)
Index No: 190079/15
NO OPPOSITION,SUMMARY
JUDGMENTMOTIONANDOrder
WHEREFORE, defendant NEW YORKERBOILER COMPANY, INC.,hereby requestssummary judgment in the'above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant NEW YORKER BOILER COMPANY, INC.,withprejudice, and there being no opppsitibn.thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to.all co-defendants; all claims and cross claims against defendantNEW YORKER BOILER COMPANY, INCi, be and the same are hcreby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.
Dated: UjÿV
Jordan FoxBELLUCKl #FQX,Attorneys f q/Plaintiff;!;.546 FifthAve'nue,:4th,'FlobrNew York, NY 10036 -
SO ORDERED,on. Peter H. Moulton
686235 lv.l
ÿ Afrhand Kalfayan, Esq.. WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ,
EDELMAN & DICKER LLPAttorney.for.DefendantNEW YORKER BOILERCOMPANY, INC.
* 150 East 42nd StreetNew York, NY 10017FileNo.: 12545.00095
%.
J.t- 4: 'V!.,".>.V.Y !.:...
SUPREME COURT OF THE-STATE OF NEW YORK • •/
COUNTY OF NEW YORK' " ;;' v
INRENEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates To:
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)
Index No: 190079/15
Frank Gondar
XV H"'* .. :>b-
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTIONANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CARRIER CORPORATION, hereby requests summary judgment inthe above-entitled case, pursuant to,Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'complaint against defendant CARRIER CORPORATION, with prejudice,' and there being noopposition thereto, . ;•
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and.cross claims against defendantCARRIER CORPORATION, be and the same are hereby dismissed.with prejudice and without costs.
Dated:
Jordan FoxBELLUCKAttorneys fo546 FifthAvNew York:
New YJbr
036;. Y
,vU
2:2-
<2.Virginia Squitieri, Esq.WILSON, ELSER, MOSICOWITZ,EDELMAN& DICKER LLPAttdmey,for.Defendant ,CARRIER CORPORATION450 East:42nd StreetNew York, NY 10017FileNo.: 10557.01798
SO ORDEREDHon. Pe'ter IT Moulton
6862352V. 1
t. '
COUNTY OF NEW YORK- - - - x
INRENEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
-----... .......This Document Relates To:
X
NYCALI.A.S.Rait 50(Moulton)
Index No: 19014ÿ/2015
Plaintiffs,
-against-
NQ OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTIONANDORDER
AERCO INTERNATIONALINC.,ct al.,
Defendants.
dismissing plaintiffs; complaint against defendant THE BOEING'COMPANY,without
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants;al| claims:and cross claims againstdefendant THE B.OEING COMPANY,be and the same.are hereby,dismissed without prejudiceandwithout costs. .
Dated: New York, New Yorkslew-York, New '
9\ izjm
Simmons Hanly Conroy LLCAttorneys for.Plaintiff112 Madison Avenue1New York, New York 10016-7416
SO ORDERED; ;
4, ELSER, MOS1COWITZ,. EDELMAN & DICKER LLPAttorney for DefendantTHE BOEING COMPANY1'50 East 42lul Street a
New York, New York lOOCKOur FileNo.07040.00045
ON. PETER H. MOULTON, J.S.C.V3//b
6932689V.1 '3 20(5
crva ÿ
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF,NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE; NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION f
DON P. DONOVANand KATHLEENDONOVAN, ÿ £;Plaintiffs,
. -against-
ABB, INC., et ah,
INDEX NO. 190046-15
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND
Imÿ ORDER£§
Defendants, ÿ
ÿ 'WHEREFORE, defendant"Neles-Jamesbury, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in
the above-entitledicase, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiff s complaint against defendant NelesUamesbury; Inc. with prejudice, and-there being no
opposition thereto, it is hereby - >
ORDERED, that upon notice ,to all co-defendants, all claims, and cross-claims against
defendant Neles-Jamcsbury, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
For purposes of this order, .facsimile and PDF signatures shall be deemed binding as
originals. ." _ V .
Dated: New York, New YorkAugust /o? ,2015
Patti BurshtynWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500Attorneysfor PlaintiffsDonP. Donovan andKathleenDonovan
Thuy 'DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLPIT77 Avenue of the Americas, 41st FloorNew York, New-York 10036(212)248-3140'. .
Attorneysfor DefendantNeles-Jamesbury, Inc. .
SO ORDERED:yfldin. Peter H.Moulton
/
W
' X
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates To:
ROBERT W. OPEL,
Plaintiffs,-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS INC., et al.
Defendants.
NYCALI.A.S.Part 50(Hon. Peter H. Moulton)
Index No.: 190081-15
NO-OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all .claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
JAMS LAWAttorneys for Plaintiff(s)245 Park Avenue, 39th Floor-New York, NY 10167(212) 668-1122
SO ORDERED,
Kirsten Alford Kneis, Esq.K&yGATES LLPAtjprneys for Defendant
VNE CO.599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030(212)536-3900
Hon. Peter H.Moultonÿ *//?//•'S*
c°0a. tl
Y
8W13 2015
"Is ehe'SCOURT .
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW-YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates To:
WILLIAM PAGANO, as Administrator for theEstate of ANN PAGANO, and WILLIAMPAGANO, Individually,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et ah,. Defendants.
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Hon. Peter H. Moulton)
Index No.: 190414/2013
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC USA,- INC., formerly known as
Square D Company, (hereinafter "SQUARE D") hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing. A ' '
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant SQUARE D with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant SQUARE D be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated:- New
Sjuzanne Rijtcliffe, Esq.WEITZ fe/uXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 1.0003 -
(212) 558-5500" ; -v i
SO ORDERED,!
Alford Kneis, Esq.GATES LLP
ttorneys for DefendantSCHNEIDER ELECTRIC USA, INC(f/k/a SQUARE D COMPANY) '599 Lexington Avenue Al/nNew York, NY 10022-6030 *(212) 536-3900
Ion. Peter H;Moulton
A
.»•- '• r'j"
ÿ i1
IRECF'VÿD
AUG 0 4 2015
KatGATES
t
V
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION—---------------....---------------ÿ- . >This Document Relates To:
IRA RITZ and AUDREY RITZ,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al,
Defendants.
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Hon. Peter H. Moulton)
tfobQa/ao/yIndex No.:W&aMm*
NO-OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
- xrWHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated:New York ew York
ÿ Frnnlf Octi?, prÿgLWEITZ & LUXEAttorneys for Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
fab\jAKimenAfford Kneis, Esq.
GATES LLPAttorneys for DefendantCRANE CO.599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030(212) 536-3900
'Efon. Peter H. Moulton
fir
AUG 0 4 2015.
K&lGaTES
_, . •'-• •• ' V- •' • > ,
SUPREME COURT 01; THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK , T . ' '
INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
-----------r-—----—... -V---.- X.
This.Document Relates.To::
NYCAL-I.A.S. Part 50(Hon. Peter H.Moulton)
Index No: 190351-13
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
JOSEPH SOLAZZO III,as Administrator for theEstateof JOSEPH SOLAZZO,
Plaintiff(s),
-against- -
AIR & LIQUID-SYSTEMS CORPORATION, assuccessor-by-merger to.BUFFALO PUMPS,INC., et al, V
Defendants. •
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint, against defendant CRANE CO. with- prejudice, and, there being no
opposition thereto,• r
> ÿ
'•
' ' -• • •• '
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants,' all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: DNew York, New.York - . . . '
Fidillv M. Qniii,Euf, £&WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plairitiff(s)700 Broadway (, . .
New York,'NY I0003(212) 558-5500 ÿÿ AAA •
'
Alford Kneis, Esq.K&€ GATES(LLPraorneys for Defendant
'CRANE CO.599 Lexirigton AvenueNew York,NY 10022-6030(212) 536-3900 ..
V"SO ORDERED, V? $
"v Hon. Peter H. Moulton. -1.L . • ÿ
W>s m
Ta -v; x
V v ' " ; - 'ÿ
. . % «ÿ'. .. : '?*ÿ"' 'ÿÿ
v'. • •
'
/.)
\' ' ,
L
RECEIVEDAUG. 0 4 2015
'K&L GATES J
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
?
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
: NYCAL: I.A.S. Part 50
(Moulton,x .: Index No.: 190277/14
SUSAN COFFIN TROISE as Executrix for the Estate ofMARCO E. TROISE and SUSAN COFFIN TROISE, asSpouse,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
WHEREFORE, Defendant HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC. as successor-in-interest
to Wilputte Coke Oven Division of Allied Chemical Corporation ("HONEYWELL/WILPUTTE") by
its attorneys Harris Beach PLLC, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against
defendant HONEYWELL/WILPUTTE with prejudice only (this Order does not apply to Honeywell
Int'l Inc. s/h/a successor to Allied Signal/Bendix Corp.), and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Honeywell/Wilputte,and the same are hereby dismissed With.prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
1:ÿ cc<ycts4 /2'2°15
Mark Bibro; Esq. ; ;
THE EARLY LAW FIRM,LLC . .
Attorneys.for Plaintiffs;360 LexingtonAvenue, 20th Floor .New York, NY 10017(212)986-2233 J
Robert A. Schaefer, JrÿEsq.HARRIS BEACHPLLCAtlornJysfor*Defendants .
HqnefYiefffitijÿMoftdlfhcfdÿ-:successor-in-interest toWilputte CokeOven Division ofAlliedChemical Corforation, "
100 Wall-Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005 .
(212)687-0100
SO ORDERED,<ÿHon ÿeteTELMoulton, J.S.C.
>li.?/u//S .• A 'ÿ
***ÿ*» ft ? *
AUG 13 2015i
•vwHS*PART 50
NYS'SUPREME COURT CIVIL
M
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK . , ; ©ÿ
InRe: NEW YORK C1TYASBESTOS LITIGATIONIndex No.: 190054/15
WALLACE HANKIN,
- against -
AURORA PUMP COMPANY, et al„
Plaintiff(s),
Defendants..
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION
WHEREFORE,. Defendant AURORA PUMP COMPANY hereby requests Summary
Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to' Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Aurora Pump.Company with prejudice, and
there being no opposition thereto, ; ..
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all chums and cross claims against
Defendant, Aurora Pump Company be and the same are.hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs to either-party. .' / ...Dated: 31: 2015
New York, New York
ISuzanne" Ratcliffe, Esq; '
WEIIK/fc LUXENBERG,P C.Attorneys,for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500'
SO ORDERED
KatrinaH. Murphy, Esq.SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY,LTD.Attorneys- for DefendantAurora Pump Company q 4(jr*850 Third Avenueÿ Suite 1100 ÿ
New York, NY- 10022
A-
: Hon. Peter H. Moulton
(212) 651.-7500- ; „ .
Sjn//s?0's
©
supreme
'i-l ÿ
* .•* • J • .
. :.*-t ÿÿ -ÿ .
ÿ". 7!'v
w
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK f -
IN RE NEW YORK CITY .ASBESTOS LITIGATION
WALLACE S. HANKIN and HELEN HANKIN,
NYCAL
Index No. 190054-2015
-against;Plaintiffs,
ÿ VI. .
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO. et al. includingROPER PUMP COMPANY,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY
JUDGMENT AS AGAINST DEFENDANTroper technologies, inc.
.!v-Vj -
'Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant ROPER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (sued herein as "Roper Pump Company")
hereby requests,summary judgment in the •,aboYere'otitle<d;case,>Rursua'nt to Civil Practice Law and Rules
Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against ROPER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., with prejudice, and
there being no opposition.thereto, *7, - :
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants,' all/claimsand cross claims against defendant
ROPER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York,',New.York
7/w/Suzanne Ratcliffe,.Esq.
'Weitz & u4xenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
: • V,
StepherTNuVakidis,.Esq.Malaby & Bradley, LLC'Attorneysfor RoperTechnologies, Inc.150'Broadway, Suite 600New YoVk, NY 10038 .
c0/ %
SO ORDERED, __ Dated:vf Hon. Peter H. Moulton
%Ny,
hS(J/
tots
'l&j :rfc
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
DON P. DONOVAN and KATHLEEN DONOVAN,
V Plaintiffs,-against-
ABB, INC. et al. includingROPER PUMP COMPANY,
Defendants.
NYCAL
Index No. 190046-2015
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT ASAGAINST DEFENDANT% ROPER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
WHEREFORE/.dÿfenÿhtRÿPEÿ.TECHNOLOGIES,' INC. (sued herein as "Roper Pump Company")
hereby requests su'mfnaÿ.jiiq|me)ife'ih the above-e'ntitlecl. case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules-
Section 3212,dismissing;:plaintiffs';fcomplaint against ROPER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., with prejudice, and
there being no opposition;tjÿ
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
ROPER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,.be and'the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: NewlYork, Nefw,York. ;
Patti Burshtyn; Esq. ÿ; -
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.GAttorneysfor Plaintiffs' ' ÿ
700 Broadway '
New York, New York 10003
SO ORDERED.: ÿ H-, ' v ÿ on:„Peter H.Mou11on....... ...
StepheirHÿeVakidis, Esq.'Malaby & Bradley, LLCAttorneysfor Roper Technologies, Inc.150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, NY 10038 . Aug
c°<%v„ '%>s,
Dated:
O
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NICHOLAS SEWAK,.,
Plaintiff,
' -againstr
ARVINMERITOR; INC. Indiviciually and as Successor in interest to theFormerAutomotiveProductsSegmehfof Rockwell Internationaletal. including ROPER POMP CO.,
NYCAL
Index No. 190491-2013
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENTAS AGAINST DEFENDANT
ROPER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Defendants.X.;
'WHERE!FORE?deferid'ant ROPER-TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (sued hereinas "ROPER PUMPCO.") hereby requests
summary judgment, in the aboveTentitlÿed case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaintÿagainst:ROPEFt TECHNOLOGIES, INC., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant ROPER
TECHNOLOGIES/ |NC„ be and,the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, I work . • .
MichaeljCOhan,, Esqÿÿ't ,\.v .£:,NapbliBernÿRipkaShkolnjk&Associates.LLRAttorneysfpcPldiniiffs.:.350 Fifth Avenue, Suite 7413" C • ÿ
New York, New York 10118.
' StepherHlova'kiflis. Esq.':Malab.y & Br.adley, LLCAttorneysfor Roper Technologies, Inc.150 Broadway,'Suite 600New York, NY 10038
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H". MOult'on
fed: Mls m
AUG 14 2015
)V„'
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK -C ,
COUNTY OF NEW YORK -n
INRE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
IRA RITZ and AUDREY RITZ,
Plaintiffs,
A.O. SMITH WALTER;PRODUCTS'CO. et al.,including, MORSE DIESEL, INC., . .
Defendants,
-x
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton,f?)
Index No. 190022/14
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, Defendant Morse Diesel, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment inthe
above-entitled.case, pursuant to CiviLPractice Law and Rules Section 3212j;dismissing plaintiffs' ,
complaint against defendant Morse Diesel, Inc., with prejudice, and'there beingno opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
Morse Diesel, Inc., be and the sariie are hereby dismissed with prejudice'and without costs.
Dated: New Yqjk, NewYork :
E/t° U, 2015
Adam S. Dreksler, Esq.WEITZ & LUNENBERGi PC.Attorneysfor PlaintiffsL . , -IraRitz andAudrey Ritz .
700 BroadwayNew York, New York; 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,-, ;
Ion. Peter;H. Moulton
%
Rosario'Chetta, Esq. j, TMALABY <& BRADLEY,LLCAttorneysfor DefendantMorse Diesel,:Inc.150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 1.0038(212) 791-0285
ated: sm
m
AUG 14 2015
SUPREME COURT OF,THE STATE OF NEW YORK .COUNTY OF NEW;YORK Y . ;
'
INRENEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
RAYMOND FLOOD andCARLEEN FLOOD, .
Plaintiffs," -v.-
NYCALI.A. S.,Part 50' '
(Moulton,'P.)
Index No. 190147/2015
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
AERCO INTERNATIONALINC., et al. , . \ .
• Defendant(s). -A Y ' , .-NY: .-:---:-:—=—ÿ---. , —x • ,-L '
WHEREFORE, defendants J. TORTORELLA SWIMMING POOL SERVICE AND
MAINTENANCE, INC. and J. TORTORELLA SWIMMING POOL'S, INC., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled,ease, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and:Rules.Section 3212, dismissing'
plaintiffs',complaint against de'fendants J. TORTORELLA SWIMMING;POOL SERVICE AND
MAINTENANCE,.INC. and J. TORTORELLA SWIMMING POOL'S, INC. '/.with prejudice, and there
being no opposition thereto, . ' ' ' " vf • L
ORDERED, that upon notice.,to all co-defendants, all claims aridxross.claims against defendants
J. TORTORELLA •SWIMMING POOL SERVICE AND MAINTENANCE; INC. and J. TORTORELLA
SWIMMING POOL'S, INC-', be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New/ÿork12015 TO-'T ""
Daniel BlouSIMMONS HANLY CONROYAttorney for Plaintiff* •/.112 Madison AveNew York, NY 1*0016 •
tracefe:L. De Mario;'Esq. '
IM%ÿBRADLEY, LLC, N TAttorney for Defendant J. TORTORELLASWIMMING POOLS; INC.150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, NY 10038
SO ORDERED, Dated:TEHon. Peter J. Moulton
AUG 14 2015COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEWYORK
"f'i '' TJiC/ '; 'V ' * ""
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK.
INRE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates.to:
—x
r . NYCALI.A.S. Part 50
-x
Index No. 190002/2015
JOHN PARKE O'CONNOR and PATRICIAO'CONNOR .
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, DefendantALCOA INC., incorrectly 'sued';herein,as- "ALCOA, INC.,Y,
individually and as successor:in,interest to.Reynolds Meÿ'Jasp"stiC(|ÿsÿ'-in interest to Triple
AAA RooTing/'herehy requests summary judgment irivthe/above chiitledjcase, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant
ALCOA INC.,withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, -it is
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, ALCOA INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs. ' . .' V' ÿÿ "
Dated: New York, New York_, 2015
. David A. Chandler, Esq.KARST & VONOISTELLPT576 Fifth Avenue,.Suite 401'New York, New York 10036Attorneysfor Plaintiff(s)John Parke O'Connor andPatriciaO 'Connor(212) 764-3900 f ;
Michael J. CurtispEsq.YMALABY & BRADLEY, LLC150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10038Attorneysfor DefendantAlcoa Inc. .
(212) 791-0285
SO ORDERED,Vr
Dated::Hon. Peter FUMoulton
m
„ m"> 2015untycLp
ÿVor®0,??ce• '-f.Y .-.,a ÿ
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION----------____-------- ---JX
This Document Relates to:DENNIS F. MADDALONE and PATRICIAMADDALONE,
Plaintiffs,
- against -
ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AMERICA, et a'l .,
Defendants.
NYCALi.A.S. Part(Judge - HeitlreT)
Index No.: 190234/14
NO-OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section §3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
Complaint against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims
and cross claims against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., be
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New 'ijqrk, New York2015
Carmen St orge, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for PlaintiffDennis Maddalone700 Broadway, 6th FloorNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
(
SO ORDERED:-
Joseph MÿAngiolillo, Esq.Cullen and Dykman LLPAttorneys for DefendantGoulds Pumps, Inc.44 Wall Street, 15th FloorNew York, New York 10005(212) 732-2000Our File No.: 6754-13289
d/lt/ls AUG 1* 2015
COUNTY CLERK'S 01F PICE
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY
-XIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION-X
Index No. : 190118/13
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
NIRVA DECOPAIN and MARIE Y. JEUNE , asCo-Executrix for the Estate of JEAN M.DONNAY
Plaintiff (s) ,
- against -
A .O . SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al ,
Defendants.--x
WHEREFORE, defendant, MARIO & DIBONO PLASTERING CO., INC.,
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,
pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against
defendant, MARIO & DIBONO PLASTERING CO. INC., with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims
and cross claims against defendant, MARIO & DIBONO PLASTERING
CO. INC., be dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkJune 29, 2015
Patti L. Burshtyn, Esq.Weitz Luxenherg, P .C .Attorneys for Plaintiff (s)
NIRVA DECOPAIN and MARIE Y.JEUNE70 0 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003212-558-5500
Austin D. O'Malleÿ/Esq.Gullen and Dykman LLPAttorneys for DefendantMARIO & DIBONO PLASTERINGINC.44 Wall StreetNew York., New York212-732-2000Our File
CO
10005"?-: %10924-6788ÿÿ
\>\
So Ordered:n. Peter H. Moulton, m
ai,
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
-X NYCALI.A. S. Part 50(Judge Moulton)
Index No. : 190047/15
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:STUART L. McMAHON and CAMILLE McMAHON,
Plaintiff (s) ,- against -
A.O . SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al . _Defendants.--------- - -X
! WHEREFORE) defendant GOULDS PUMPS', INC. hereby requests<
ÿ'* ' ' r-' 5-' i • '
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section §3212, dismissing plaintiff's
Complaint against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC. with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims
and cross claims against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC. be
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York_9IH_. 2015
COto-crp--""_Patti L. Burshtyn, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff (s)
STUART AND CAMILLE MCMAHON,700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
Austin D. 0'MalleyÿÿEsqCullen and Dykman LLPAttorneys for DefendantGOULDS PUMPS, INC.44 Wall StreetNew York, New York 10005212-732-2000Our File No.: 6754-13655
So Ordered: —-Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.
°iXw ©
court
I5(o2&
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY.ASBESTOS LITIGATION
-X
This Document Relates to:JOEL BERLIN and JEANNE BERLIN,
Plaintiffs,
- against -
AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., et al.,.
Defendants .
-X
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(.(P. Moulton)
Index No.: 190022/15
NO-OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section §3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
Complaint against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to. all co-defendants, all claims
and cross claims against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., be
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
fork, New
-Dated: New Yor}c, New York
2015
Patti Burshtyn, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for PlaintiffJoel Berlin700 Broadway, 6th FloorNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED:
Joseph M. ÿerlgiolillo, EsqCullen and Dykman LLPAttorneys for Defendafxb,
%4.4 Wall Street, 15th Flopt, SGoulds Pumps, Inc. % <(212) 732-2000Our File No. : 6754ÿ13626
New York, New York 100<£|ÿ
Peter H. Moulton
OW
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:JOSE ROSELLI and LESLIE ROSELLI,
Plaintiffs,
- against -
A .0 . SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al
Defendants.
-X
-X
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(P. Moulton)
Index No.: 190410/14
NO-OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
-X
WHEREFORE, defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., hereby requests
summary j udgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section §3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
Complaint against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims
and cross claims against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., be
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkPI i7- . 2015
Patti Burshtyn, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for PlaintiffJose Roselli700 Broadway, 6th FloorNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
oseph M. /Angiolillo, Esq.Cullen anaDykman LLPAttorneys for DefendantdrtnlJa Pwmrvc Tnn &Goulds Pumps, Inc.44 Wall Street, 15th FloNew York, New York 1000(212) 732-2000Our File No.: 6754-13588
SO ORDERED:f*
Hon. Peter H. Moulton'ijnjts =0Wl5lB)
Me 12 2015
CIVil
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRENEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates To:
Joseph L. O'Leary and Gail O'Leary
xNYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)
Index No: 190132/14
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTIONANDORDER
x
WHEREFORE, defendant CARRIER CORPORATION hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,1dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CARRIER CORPORATION withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendants CARRIER CORPORATION, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.
Dated:New York, NY
Chris Romanelli, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
SO ORDERED,
6552230v.1
/. "Hon. Peter H.Moulton, J.S.C.
Virginia Squitieri, Esq.WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWHEDELMAN& DICKER LLPAttorney for DefendantCARRIER CORPORATION150 East 42nd StreetNew York, NY 10017FileNo.: 10557.01613
%, °ei
SJp/i'isAUE 122015
Nys <S~ÿcZr.CIVIL
<' ".' . J •. : • • »-> .•• ?r • ' •
'
.'
. .ÿ'
: . • .* ."-v ÿ>'
y ?.'r . "5? _ . v •
ÿ
• - ; -V -
SUPREME COURTOF THE.STATE OF NEW YORK - - ; A*"COUNTY OF NEW.YORKY. -7
IN RE NEW YORK .COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates To:
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton,
Index No: 190084/15
Adrian R. SmithNO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTIONANDORDER
.WHEREFORE, "defendant CONWED CORPORATION hereby requests summaryjudgment in.the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing'plaintiffs.complaint against defendant CONWED CORPORATION with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that,upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant CONWED CORPORATION, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without cOsts.
Dated: jH/ (j, £ /„
NewYork, NY
DanielWasserbergÿfeSqMEIROWITZ &WASSERBERG, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff •.
845 Third Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022
SO ORDERED,
Virginia Squitieri,.Esq.WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ,EDELMAN & DICKER LLP.Attorney for DefendantCONWED CORPORATION15G;East 42nd Street *New York, NY 10017FileNo.: 07415.002FT 4fa 7
4. PETER H. MOULTON, J.S.C.
_
6748989v.1
m n
ÿV i ÿÿÿ /•'
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, iCOUNTY OF NEW YORK U' -
'
. . ,' ;
INRE NEW YORK COUNTY . .ASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)
This Document Relates To: Index No: 190414/13
William Pagano, as Administrator for the Estateof AnnPagano and William Pagano, Individually,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTIONANDORDER
- - - x
WHEREFORE,, defendant CARRIER CORPORATION, incorrectly s/h/a "BRYANTHEATING & COOLING SYSTEMS" (hereinafter "CARRIER CORPORATION") herebyrequests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and RulesSection 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CARRIER CORPORATIONwith prejudice, arid there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendarits, all claims arid cross claims againstdefendants CARRIER CORPORATION, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs. ' *
Dated:NewiMti
York!NY
Weit/M Luxenberg, P/C. . v; A;Attorneys for TlairitifUA "
•
700 Broadway ' :
New York, NY 100,03,
Virginia Squitieri, Esq.WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ,EDELMAN& DICKER LÿPAttorney for DefendantCARRIER CORPORATlOr
.'150 East 42nd. StreetNew York, NY 1001ÿ. - ,FileNo.: 10557.01506 UA/Tyn *0?$
%U
SO ORDERED,on. Peter H.Moulton, J.S.C. %/ahs SQEOWED
AUG 12 2015
6845554v.1 COURT - CIVIL