Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019 · oct 01 2019 supreme court...
Transcript of Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019 · oct 01 2019 supreme court...
Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and ordersfiled on the selected date. The documents are displayedin no particular order. However, all of these documentsare searchable.
To find a specific order, please use the Search/Findfunction within a PDF viewer.
1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f(Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac);
2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the formfield provided and press Enter or Return.
In most applications, the first appearance of the indexnumber, the word, or the phrase in the document will behighlighted.
Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications,including browsers and PDF viewers.
OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
-X
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALPart 13Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.x
Ida Flynn Individually and as Executrix for the Estate ofMartin E. Flynn, Index No.: 125539/2000
Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.Plaintiff(s),4
-against-iUNOPPOSED SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERAC AND S, INC., ET AL,
Defendants.xOIMOHH —
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General
Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against
defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants
there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC
COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New Yorkus
A UM KEALE LLWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
YlBy: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102
By: JamesU'hoimjson, Esq.Attorneys for rlainfijffs)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
F I L E DOCT 01 2019
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORKMANUEL J. MENDEZ
J.S.C.
OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
PART 13NVS SUPREME COURT * CIVIL
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13
x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.ROBERT EDWARD STEC,
Index No.: 1997-7495; 100557/1999;Plaintiff(s),
Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.-against-
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
A. W. CHESTERTON CO., ET AL.,
Defendants.x4U——4w ~m-
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: "General
Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against
defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC
COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. EMBAUM KFULE L
/\
By: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102
By: Jamb£ Thompson, Esq.Attorneys fob Plofttifffs)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
F I L E DOCT 01 2019
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
OCT 01 2019PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT • CIVILSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xNYCALPart 13
x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
»•**•*«
STEVEN M. SHERLOCK AND ADAM D. SHERLOCKAS CO-ADMINISTRATORS FOR THE ESTATE OFMILLARD D. SHERLOCK,
Index No.: 122391/2001
Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.Plaintiff(s),
i-against- UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
AC AND S, INC,ET AL,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General
Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against
defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants
there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC
COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C.
qs Thompson, Esq.
Attorneysfor P/pintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
By: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102
By: J
F I L E DOCT 01 2019
MANUEL J.MENDEZJ.S.C. COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
NEW YORK
OCT 01 2019PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALPart 13
x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.IN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION•*«•»W«— j»
CARMELLA M. SCHUMACHER, ASADMINISTRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF GEORGER. SCHU,ACHER AND CARMELLA M.SCHUMACHER, INDIVIDUALLY,
Index No.: 111912/2003
Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C
Plaintiffs), ;UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
-against-
A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General
Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against
defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants
there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC
COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New Yorkqm 1,14TANWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C.
1'Ey: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102
By: JamV/ Thonroson, Esq.Attorneys f<\Plaijitiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
012019
COUNTYCLERK'SHEWYORK
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C. office
OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILX
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALPart 13
x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.BEATRICE PAPANTONIO, INDIVIDUALLY AND ASEXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF ALFRED L.PAPANTONIO,
Index No.: 125871/1999
Weitz & Luxenberg, P. CPlaintiff(s),
-against- UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
AC AND S, INC., ET AL.,
DefendantsX
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General
Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against
defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants
there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC
COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. T
By: Jamas Thompson, Esq.Attorneys/(>r Plckntiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
By: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102 toFI L
01 2019
COUNTYCLERK'SOMrwYORKMANUEL J. MENDEZ
J.S.C.
OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL— X
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALPart 13
- x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.CGARY W. MASI AND PHILIP G. MASI AS CO-EXECUTORS FOR THE ESTATE OF EVA M. MASI, Index No.: 106643/2001;
115469/2001Plaintiffs),
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. i
-against-UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
AC AND S, INC., ET AL.,
Defendants. —x
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General
Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against
defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants
there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC
COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New Yorkqt io/tAUM KEALE LLWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C.
70By: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102
By: Jame^/Thomplon, Esq.Attorneys for Plaint jff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
f \ L E°ft \ LOWr\
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.s.c.
OCT 01 2019PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
“XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13Hon. Manuel J. Mendez. J.S.C.—- x
JAMES LOKENBERG, AS PROPOSED EXECUTRIXFOR THE ESTATE OF ALBERT H. LOKENBERG ANDDOLORES E.LOKENBERG, INDIVIDUALLY,
Index No.: 110332/2008
Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.'Plaintiff(s),
IUNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
-against-
iA. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,Defendants.
--X
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General
Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against
defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants
there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC
COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York°U3oji4
TANENBAUM KEALJTLLPWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C.
Cy: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102
By: JameaThompson, Esq.Attorneys fo\Plaifitiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
F I L E 0OCT « * m
>S OFFICEC°UNTE OWMANUEL J. MENDEZ
J.S.C.
OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILX
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALPart 13— x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
GARY D. KING, LINDA BALLAR AND TIMOTHYKING AS CO-ADMINISTRATORS FOR THE ESTATEOF MATTHEW KING AND DOTTIE KING ASPROPOSED EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OFDOLLY KING,
?
Index No.: 107012/2005
Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.
Plaintiff(s), UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER-against-
A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,
Defendants.x9****++**«» >*<*« *M MM*
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General
Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against
defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants
there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC
COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New Yorktfho I.) *7WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM KEAtE LLP
zBy: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102
By: James'Tltomplon, Esq.Attorneys for rxiintitf(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
£0
,.sMANUEL J. MENDEZ
J.S .C .
OCT 01 2019PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xI'M 'Mf W—*•+**—-**WMt < «»»•»»*« «•*•*«•*wnww'.WMtxi
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALPart 13
x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.•4*M *44-4» X* <*»-4» '•i':***
GARY LEE KLINDT, AS EXECUTRIX FOR THEESTATE OF HERBERT KLINDT, Index No.: 105764/2006
Plaintiff(s), Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.
-against-UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERA. O.SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,
Defendants. —X> •
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General
Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against
defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC
COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
HlloUXTANENBAUM KEAJLE LLWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C.
By: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102
By: Jarn^l Thompson, Esq.Attorneys fat' Plcynliff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
o,,so ce
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13— x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
ERIC KOGEL AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVEFOR THE ESTATE OF DAVID KOGEL AND ISABELKOGEL, INDIVIDUALLY,
Index No.: 110255/2004
Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.Plaintiff(s),
-against- UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,
Defendants. —x*****m
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “GeneralElectric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRICCOMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
OIMU4WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM KEALE jLLP
By: JameWhonV&son, Esq.Attorneys forrlairyiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
By: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S .C
OCT 01 2019PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
-—xNYCALPart 13
x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
JOHN HAUGH, AS ADMINISTRATOR FOR THEESTATE OF THOMAS HAUGH, Index No.: 122281/2003
Plaintiffs), Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.
-against-UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERA. J. PEGNO CONSTRUCTIONS CORP., ET AL.,
Defendants*“-”X
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General
Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against
defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants
there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC
COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York±l3oj (4
TANENBAUM KEALE LLPWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C.*
Cy: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102
By: Jamel Thompson, Esq.Attorneysjoi( Plajntiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
\l^MANUEL J. MENDEZ
J .S .C.
OCT 01 2019PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK —xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13
x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.> «•* m «
MARIE L. COSTANZO AS EXECUTRIX FOR THEESTATE OF ANGELO E. COSTANZO AND MARIE L.COSTANZO, INDIVIDUALLY,
Index No.: 111780/2004
Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.Plaintiff(s), ;
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
-against-
A. 0. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL., i
Defendants.-x
JWHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General
Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against
defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC
COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New Ycrk
1WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM KEA
By: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102
By: Jaroei Thompson, Esq.Attorneys Plaijitiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
tsa
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
PART 13I NYS SUPREME COURT • CIVIL
-X4MIMII —* W» m WlIMM M mm —*+ 4m\
IN RE; NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALPart 13
x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.GERALD H. CAUGHELL, JR., AS EXECUTOR FORTHE ESTATE OF GERALD H. CAUGHELL, SR., ANDMARGARE JEAN CAUGHELL, INDIVIDUALLY,
Index No.: 105602/2004
Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.Plaintiff(s),
-against- UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General
Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against
defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC
COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
TANENBAUM KEAWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C.
J
By: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102
By: Janjfes Thompson, Esq.Attorneys wr Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIC— ———— — —IN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13
x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.CLINDA LUMSDEN-ROBERTS, AS PERSONALREPRESENTATVE FOR THE ESTATE OF KENNETHF. CARPERNTER AND SALINA A.CARPENTER,INDIVIDUALLY,
Index No.: 119396/2007
Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.
Piaintiff(s),UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
-against-;
A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General
Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against
defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants
there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC
COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM KEALE LLP
By: James/Thornftson, Esq.Attorneys fonPlaijjtiJf(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
By: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102
\l&
****MENDEZ
J .S .C .MANUEL J-
OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILXIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13
x Hon. Manuel J . Mendez, J.S.C.ANNA L. VARGAS AS PROPOSEDADMINISTRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE OFMARGARITA CAMBRELEN,
Index No.: 101029/2007
Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.1Plaintiffs),
i-against- UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
>:
A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,
Defendants. ——x
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General
Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC
COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. AUM KEASLE LLP.
<5
By: JamesjThompson, Esq.Attorneys fo\piainliff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
By: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102
F I L E DOCT 01 20«
ft/JANUEL. J. MENDEZJ .S .C .
'S OFFICE
%
OCT 01 2019PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
—xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13— x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
FRANKLYN FARRIS, AS ADMINISTRATOR FORTHE ESTATE OF JOHN C. BOWEN, Index No.: 106669/2000
Plaintiff(s), Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C, V
1-against-
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
*
A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General
Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against
defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants
there is no opposition, it isORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC
COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New Yorklink!
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C.
\By: Janrel Thompson, Esq.Attorneys fdr Plamtiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
By: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102
F I L E DOCT 01 ZOW
con»srcEMANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILX
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALPart 13
- x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.M» — 4**** 4*4?«4*
EVELYN ORTIZ, AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THEESTATE OF GILBERTO ARCE (A/K/A GILBERTOORTIZ-ARCE) AND MARIA HERNANDEZ OLIVIO,INDIVIDUALLY,
Index No.: 127677/2002
Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C,
Plaintiff(s),UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
i
-against-
A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,
Defendants. —x
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General
Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC
COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York±119111
TANENBAUM KE/LE LLWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C.
By: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 0710
By: Jamis Thompson, Esq.Attorneys jck PlcAntiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
F I L E DCC!01 2019
COUNTY CLERK'NEW YORK
S OFFICEMANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
XNYCALPart 13Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION — x
CATHERINE L. BENSON, AS ADMINSTRATR1X FORTHE ESTATE OF GUSTAVE A. BENSON,
-» »» ktm 4* ++****m4*m4»**m. «•»«•«•»••••«*•«•
Index No.: 113471/2004
Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.Plaintiff(s),
-against-UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERA. O.SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,
Defendants.x»»>liru>444
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General
Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against
defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants
there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC
COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New Yorkq tte LisWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM KEAJLE LU
By: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102
Thompson, Esq.By: JaAttorneys fir Pla\ntiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
F I L E DOCT «1 MW
'’S OFFICEC°UNTYN&KMANUEL J. MENDEZ
J.S.C.
(BEOEWEPOCT 01 2019
PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13
x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.LOLA BIZAS AS ADMINISTRATRIX FOR THEESTATE OF STEVEN JAMES BIZAS AND LOLABIZAS, INDIVIDUALLY,
Index No.: 190118/2008
Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.Plaintiff(s),
-against- UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,
Defendants.•x
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General
Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRICCOMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New Yorkejsoju
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM KEALE LLP
By: James Thompson, Esq.AttorneysJbr Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
JBy: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102
F I L E DOCT ttl M'9-S OFFICE
C°untvn&MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S .C.
OCT 01 2019PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13
x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.rw-w*MPMMMCjH***'m&m****mm
BENDETTA BLANDO, AS EXECUTRIX FOR THEESTATE OF SALVATORE F. BLANDO ANDBENEDETTA BLANCO, INDIVIDUALLY,
Index No.: 100725/2003
Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.Plaintiff(s),
-against- UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,Defendants.
x
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General
Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against
defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants
there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC
COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P. C. T
By: JameVThomplon, Esq.Attorneys forSflaint\ff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
By: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102
MANUEL J. MENDEZ
OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALPart 13
- x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.ALAN IRGANG, INDIVIDUALLY AND ASADMISNITRATOR FOR THE ESTATE OF DORISIRGANG AND ALAN IRGANG, INDIVIDUALLY,
Index No.: 112676/2007
Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.Plaintiff(s),
-against- UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
!
A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO,ET AL,
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “GeneralElectric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRICCOMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New Yorkg l bO jjWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM KEALE
7?By: JamesfThonpson, Esq.Attorneys fonPlairniff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
Michael A. Tanenbaum, fisq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102
to<s\W
..soff'ctMANUEL J. MENDEZ
J.S.C.
OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT * CIVIL
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13
x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.I'
lfrm if** — mmim********»-
CRAIG W. LAWSON, ESQ., AS PERSONALREPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OF JOHN H.MCGILL AND BARBARA MCGILL, INDIVIDUALLY,
Index No.: 190314/2011
Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.Plaintiff(s),
-against- UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
CARRIER CORP., ET AL.,
Defendants —-x1 — »i— 4M .>
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “GeneralElectric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRICCOMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York±I M MWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. TANENBAUM KEA
By: James Thompson, Esq.Attorneys for ffaintuf (s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
fey: Michael A. Tanenbaurn^Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102
F I L E DOCT 01 20«
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
•’S OFFICEC0UtmNEWV<W
OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
X4** <
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALPart 13
x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.mrw» «*•**«* fa*
ANNA C. MIMNAUGH, AS EXECUTRIX FOR THEESTATE OF JAMES MIMNAUGH AND ANNMIMNAUGH, INDIVDUALLY,
Index No.: 100652/2006
Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C. i;Plaintiff(s),
-against- UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,
Defendants. —x»**•*»» w — «
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General
Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC
COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P- C. TANENBAUM KEALE
$By: JanteslThowipson, Esq.Attorneys foAPlawtiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
Ytyf Michael A. Tanenbaum,Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102
MANUEL J- MENDEZ
OCT 01 2019PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK -—xmum im.mmi
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALPart 13
x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.<ir.OLGA MUNOZ-GALLUCIO, AS PERSONALREPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OF JAIME A.MUNOZ AND MARIA D. MUNOZ, INDIVIDUALLY,
Index No.: 190341/2011<
Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C,jPlaintiff(s), i
J-against- UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO,ET AL,
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “GeneralElectric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRICCOMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
SmJiiWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
By: Jarroas Thompson, Esq,Attorneys jSr PlamtifJ(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
By: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark. New Jersey 07102 « to
*\ 1®"
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S .C.
OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILX
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALPart 13Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.x
MARIA OSORIO, AS PROPOSED ESTATE OF JOSEOSORIO AND MARIA OSORIO, INDIVIDUALLY, Index No.: 190364/2011
Plaintiff(s), Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.
-against-UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERA. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General
Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC
COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
°l Ml*)WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM KEAI/E LLP
By: Jamas Thompson, Esq.Attorneys j&r Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
©y: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102
f \ L t0MANUEL J. MENDEZ
J.S.C.
OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL-X
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALPart 13
- x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.CARMELA PERTICONE, AS ADMINISTRATRIX FORTHE ESTATE OF ANNIBALE S. PERTICONE ANDCARMELA PERTICONE, INDIVIDUALLY,
Index No.: 190427/2010
Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.Plaintiffs),
-against- UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
!
BELL & GOSSETT COMPANY, ET AL,
DefendantsI—x
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General
Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRICCOMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM KEA— /lA—By: JameVfjnompron, Esq. tBy:: Michael A. TanenbaumfEsq.Attorneys for nlaintijf(s) VAttorneys for General Electric Company700 Broadway Three Gateway Center, Suite 1301New York, New York 10003 100 Mulberry Street
Newark, New Jersey 07102
F I L E DOCT 01 2019
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C. COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
NEW YORK
OCT 01 2019PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
*54- —NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALPart 13
x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
IN RE:
«*•*•*
\\BETHANY S. SNYDER AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE
ESTATE OF WILLIAM S. SNYDER, Index No.: 190243/2009!
5Plaintiff(s), Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C, ii
-against-UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
:)
A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,Si;
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General
Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants
there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC
COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
QJJ4
;!
TANENBAUM KEAWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C.
By: Jame^ /Thompjfon, Esq.Attorneys fonPlaintiyfs)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
©y: Michael A. Tanenbaunvfcsq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102
F I L E DOCT 01 2019
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
OCT 01 2019PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURTSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
- CIVIL
-X*- — — — —IN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.x
FRANK VIGLIOTTI,Index No.: 105499/2001
Plaintiff(s),Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.
-against-UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
AC AND S, INC., ET AL.,
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General
Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC
COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New Yorkg rip l /<?WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM KEALE LL
By: Jame^jThornpson, Esq.Attorneys forYlairkiff(s)700 Broadway *New York, New York 10003
By: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102
F I L E DOCT 01 2019
. CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S .C. COUNTY
OCT 01 2019PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK —x
NYCALPart 13
x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.IN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION|it* MAt'wW 1
ERROL SILVERBERG, AS PERSONALREPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESATE OF HARRYSILVERBERG AND ERROL SILVERBERG ASPROPOPOSED PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FORTHE ESTATE OF ROSLYN SILVERBERG,
Index No.: 108537/2002
Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C. i
iPlaintiff(s), UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER-against-
*
AC AND S5 INC., ET AL.,
Defendants.——x
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General
Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against
defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC
COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM KEALE LL
By: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102F I L E D
By: James^ homvson, Esq.Attorneys for rlainmff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
ot f o i wMANUEL J. MENDEZ
J.S.C. pE'SOfFlCE
OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT • CIVILXIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13— x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
SYLVIA T. SENECAL, INDIVIDUALLY AND ASADMINISTRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF ARTHUR J. Index No.: 110579/2002SENECAL,
Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C,Plaintiff(s),
i-against- UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
i
AC AND S, INC,ET AL,
Defendants. —~xWHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General
Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRICCOMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York. New Yorkq / f e /v 7WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. TANENBAUM LP
James^ hornpfcon, Esq.Attorneys for Ylainhfff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
By: By: Michael A. TanenAttorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102
, Esq.
F I L E DOCT 01 2019
COUNTY CLERK’SOFRCENEW YORK
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL—Xt*IW*W ** •*+•
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALPart 13Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.x
JOHN LOEPFE, JR., AS EXECUTOR FOR THEESTATE OF CONSTANCE LOEPFE AND JOHNLOEPFE, INDIVIDUALLY,
Index No.: 190342/2010
Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.Plaintiff(s),
-against- UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
:
CBS CORP., ET AL.,
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “GeneralElectric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRICCOMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM KEALE LLP
By: Janies Thompson, Esq.Attorneys jpr Plfintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
By: Michael A. Tane<B^um, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102
P I L E DOCT 01 2019
. CLERK'SOFFICENEW YORK
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S.C . COUNTY
OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURTX - CIVILIN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALPart 13
x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.SALVADOR MARTINEZ, JR. AND MILDREDMARTINEZ, Index No.: 120327/1999
Plaintiffs), Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.
-against-UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERA. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,
:
DefendantsX
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “GeneralElectric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRICCOMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
1L7UUWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. ENBAUM KE&LE LL
By: Jarnls Thompson, Esq.Attorneys\r Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
By: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102
F I L E DOCT 0 1 2019
COUNTYCLERK'SOFFICE-NEW YORKMANUEL J. MENDEZ
J .S.C.
OCT 01 2019PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT • CIVILSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK —xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13— x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.JEANNIE E. UNDERHILL, AS ADMINISTRATIVE
FOR THE ESTATE OF DONALD M. MCCORMICK, Index No.: 109417/2000
Plaintiffs), Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.-against-
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERAC AND S, INC., ET AL.,
Defendants.X;
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “GeneralElectric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRICCOMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
UMllWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM KEAJLEJLLP
/X
James (Khomfcson, Esq.Attorneys forrlaimiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
By: By: Michael A. TanenbAttorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102
, Esq.
F I L E DOCT 01 2019
COUNTYCLERK’SQFRQELNEW YORK
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13
x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.GERALD J. MCCORMICK AND MARIONMCCORMICK, Index No.: 190366/2009
sPlaintiff(s), Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C. i
-against-UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERA. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,
Defendants. —x
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: ‘‘GeneralElectric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRICCOMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York.New York
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM
By: Jarres Thompson, Esq.Attorneys jkr Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
By: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102
F I L E DOCT 01 2019
COUNTY CLERK’S OFFICENEW YORKMANUEL J. MENDEZ
J.S.C.
OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13
x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.NICHOLAS MINCELI AND ROSE MINCIELI,,
Index No.: 190087/2011Plaintiffs),
Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.-against-
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “GeneralElectric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRICCOMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New YorL New York
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM KEAJLE LL
By: Jarri^s Thompson, Esq.Attorneys for PIamtiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
By: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102
F I L E DOCT 01 2019
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
OCT 01 2019PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT • CIVILSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK —xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.x'****** •
WARREN WILLARD OLIVER, JR. AND MARYOLIVER, Index No.: 190146/2011
<
Plaintiff(s), Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C*
f
-against-$'!UNOPPOSED SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERCARRIER CORP., ET AL.,
v
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “GeneralElectric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRICCOMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New YorkmmWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM P
JameY Thompson, Esq.Attorneys forPlafitiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
By: By: Michael A. Tanenbattm, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102
OCT 01 2019
TY CLERK'SOFFlQt.NEWYORKCCUNMANUEL J. MENDEZ
J .S .C .
OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALPart 13
- x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.1
LYNDA PADULA AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATEOF DENNIS F. PADULA, INDIVIDUALLY, Index No.: 101177/1999
Plaintiff(s), Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C. ;
-against-UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERAC AND S, INC., ET AL„
Defendants* .
x
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General
Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC
COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM KEA
iJBy: Michael A. Tanenbaum/csq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102
By: Jarres Thompson, Esq,
Attorneysfyr Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
OCl 'AK"5MANUEL J. MENDEZ
J.S.C.rsCfc*'
OCT 01 2019PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK — x
NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
IN RE: NYCALPart 13
- x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.DAVID WILLIAM PREMO AND JACQUELINE PELE,
Index No.: 113233/2002Plaintiff(s),
Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.-against-
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General
Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against
defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants
there is no opposition, it isORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC
COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York. New YorkflfunWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM KEA
By: James Thpmpabn, Esq.Attorneys for Pmintijjf(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
By: Michael A. TanenbaumHEsq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102
F I L E DOCT 01 2019
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C. COUNTY Cl.ERF'S OFFICE
NEWYORK
OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
X
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALPart 13- x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
JOSEPHINE FERNANDEZ AS EXECUTRIX FOR THESTATE OF ANTONIO FERNANDEZ ANDJOSEPHINE FERNANDEZ, INDIVIDUALLY,
Index No.: 190435/2010
Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.Plaintiff(s),
-against- UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,
Defendants
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General
Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against
defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC
COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York. New York
°jmnWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM KE P
By: Jamis Thdppson, Esq.AttorneysJor Plafntiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
By: Michael A. TanenbAttorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102
, Esq.
eoMANUEL J. MENDEZ
J S C.
OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILXIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13— x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J .S.C.»'HUM :
ROXANA GARAY, AS ADMINISTRATRIX FOR THEESTATE OF JULIO C. GARAY AND ROXANAGARAY, INDIVIDUALLY,
Index No.: 12804/2011
Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.PIaintiff(s),
-against- UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
BORG-WARNER CORPORATION, ET AL.,
Defendants —x
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General
Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against
defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC
COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New Yo~kwinWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM KEALE LLP
XBy: Jam©sfrhon#son, Esq.Attorneys fonPlairmfffs)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
By: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for GeneraI Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center. Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102
OCT 01 2019MANUEL J. MENDEZ
J.S.C .'<g OFFICECOUNTYCLERI
NEWYORK
OCT 01 2019PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
-xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13
x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.STEVEN GERHARDT AND IRENE JOYCEGERDHART, Index No.: 117214/2006
Plaintiffs), Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C,i
-against-UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERA. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO,ET AL,
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “GeneralElectric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRICCOMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
SMMWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. TANENBAUM KEAL
By: JameVfhompabn, Esq.Attorneys forjttaintiff '(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
fiy: Michael A. TanenbaurAttorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102
F I L E DOCT 01 2019
COUNTY CfJERK’S OFFICENEWYORK
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
OCT 01 2019PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK —-xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.- x
PATRICIA M. GIBBS AS ADMINISTRATRIX FORTHE ESTATE OF GEORGE GIBBS AND PTRICIAGIBBS, INDIVIDUALLY,
Index No.: 190078/2010
Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C,Plaintiff(s),
i
-against- UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
j
vA. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “GeneralElectric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRICCOMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New YorkmmWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. TANENBAUM LP
XBy: JamestThomi/son, Esq.Attorneys forrlainkff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
By: Michael A. Tanenlku)m, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102
F I L E DOCT 01 2019
COUNTY CLERK'SOFFICENEW YORK
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S.C
OCT 01PART 13
NyS SUPREME COUR_J .SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK —xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13
x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.DENISE HAMM AS PROPOSED EXECUTRIX FORTHE ESTATE OF KENNETH HAMM AND DENISEHMM, INDIVIDUALLY,
Index No.: 190410/2009
Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.PIaintiff(s),
-against- UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO,ET AL,
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “GeneralElectric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRICCOMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM P
By: Jam8sThoim>son, Esq.Attorneys for Plaimiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
By: Michael A. TanenbaiTm, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center. Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102
F I L E D«««sssMANUEL J. MENDEZ
J .S.C.
OCT 01 2019 i
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
x> •*** «
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALPart 13Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
•;\\
— XBERNARD F. HILL, INDIVIDUALLY AND AUBREYPRIMROSE AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FORTHE ESTATE OF RITA HILL,
Index No.: 190083/2010
Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.Plaintiff(s),
j-against- UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
JA. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO,ET AL,
Defendants.x
jWHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “Genera)
Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRICCOMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
*i m fiWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. TANENBAUM KEALE LLP
By: James! Thompson, Esq.Attorneys fd( Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
By: Michael A. TanenbAttorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102
F I L E DOCT 01 2019
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORKMANUEL J. MENDEZ
OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILX
NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
IN RE: NYCALPart 13
x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.ELVIN L. HOUSER, !
jIndex No.: 190325/2016
PlaintifF(s),Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.
!-against-:
/UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,yDefendants.
-xWHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General
j
Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRICCOMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
KM1SWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM KEALE LLP
2By: JaVres Thompson, Esq.Attorneys jipr PImintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
By: Michael A. Tanenba^h^ Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102
F I L E DOCT 01 2019
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S.C. COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
NEW YORK
OCT 01 2019PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK —xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13
x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.CONRAD J. FASSETT,
Index No.: 114784/2002 &106691/2002Plaintiff(s),
-against- Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C,
A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL., UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERDefendants.
-—x
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General
Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against
defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants
there is no opposition, it isORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC
COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkfimJjiWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM KEALE LLP
By: Jaraes Thompson, Esq.Attorneys jbr Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
. TanFnAttorneys for General Elebtdc CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102
By:
F I L E DOCT 01 2019
COUNTY cMANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
LEFTSOFFICENEWYORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
OCT 01 2019XNEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
IN RE: NYCALPart 13Hon. Manuel J. Meh'dez, J.S.C:
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT • CIVILX
GLORIA EMANUEL, AS PERSONALREPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OF ARTHURJAMES EMANUEL AND GLORIA EMANUEL,INDIVIDUALLY,
Index No.: 190389/2009
Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.Plaintiff(s),
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
-against-
A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL,
Defendants.-x
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “GeneralElectric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRICCOMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New YorkJjMkWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM
By: Jarnsi Thompson. Esq,
Attorneys foS PIairyiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
By: Michael A. TaneTft^um, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102
F I L E DOCT 01 2019
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S .C . "SorncECCUNTYCLEW
NEW YORK
RE©EB¥EO>OCT 01 2019
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL— xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13— x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
RONALD RICHARD DOEDEMA AND PATRICIADOEDEMA, Index No.: 11579/2002
Plaintiff(s), Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.
-against-UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERA C ANDS., INC.
Defendants.~x
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General
Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against
defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants
there is no opposition, it isORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC
COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York-New York
imnWEITZ & LUXENBERG,\P.C. TANENBAUM REAL
By: Jamek /Thomplon, Esq.Attorneys forylaintijfffs)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
Bfy: Michael A. Tanenbaum,"Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102 —F I L E D
OCT 01 2019SOFFICECOUNTYCUERK
HEW YORKMANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C .
OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13
x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.- «.*w
LAURA DILLION, AS EXECUTRIX FOR THEESTATE OF THOMAS DILLION AND LAURADILLION, INDIVIDUALLY,
Index No.: 190338/2009
Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C,Plaintiff(s),
-against- UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO,ET AL,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “GeneralElectric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRICCOMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New Yorka/k/ixWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAU
2By: Jam^sfThomftson, Esq.Attorneys fonPlairlijffs)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
By: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102
FU- EDOCT 01 2019/A
COUNTY CLERKSOFFICENEW YORKMANUEL J. MENDEZ
J .S.C .
OCT 01 2019PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK — —xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13Hon. Manuel J . Mendez, J.S.C.X
MARY R. CROW, AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATEOF MILTON F. CROW, AND MARY R. CROW,INDIVIDUALLY,
Index No.: 111883/2007
Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.Plaintiff(s),
-against- UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO,ET AL,
Defendants.-x
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “GeneralElectric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRICCOMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM MEA
VpPBy: Jarnts^lThontoson, Esq. / / By: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq .Attorneys fo^Plairtiff(s) ^ Attorneys for General Electric Company700 Broadway Three Gateway Center. Suite 1301New York, New York 10003 100 Mulberry Street
Newark, New Jersey 07102
FILEDOCT 01 2019
COUNTYa.ERV'Si.NEWYORK
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S.C.
OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL——XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13— x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
1
>
CAROLE M. CLARKE, INDIVIDUALLY AND SUSANCLARKE AS EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OFGERARD M. CLARKE,
iIndex No.: 107334/2008
Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.Plaintiff(s),
f
i-against- UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO,ET AL,
Defendants.—x
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “GeneralElectric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRICCOMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New. YorkHimWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM KE P
By: JamessThornrpon, Esq.Attorneys for\lain\fff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
By: Michael A. TanenbakaJ, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102F I L E D
OCT Q1 2019MANUEL J. MENDEZ
J.S.C.
OCT 01 2019PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK —xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13— x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
ARTHUR C. CLARK JR. AND ARNITA CLARK,Index No.: 114787/2002
Plaintiff(s),Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.
-against-UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
A C AND S., INC., ET AL,
Defendants.-x******
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “Genera!
Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against
defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC
COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New YormtWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM LLP
By: Jarrtajf Thompson, Esq.Attorneys fak Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
By: Michael A. Tane:Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102
m, Esq.
F I L E DOCT 01 2019
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORKMANUEL J. MENDEZ
J.S.C .
OCT 01 2019PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK —xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13—~ x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
GABRIEL CINTORINO AND EVA CINTORINO,Index No.: 100081/2008
Plaintiff(s),Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.
5-against- iUNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
;;)A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,
$Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “GeneralElectric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRICCOMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New Yor! York
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. BAUM KMLE L
7XBy: JameYThompson, Esq.Attorneys for Plain fff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
By: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102
F I L E DOCT 01 2019
COUNTY CORK'SOFFICENPfcXQRK
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S.C.
OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
—XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13
x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.LISA VANSCHAICK, AS EXECUTRIX FOR THEESTATE OF ANDREW T. CATON, Index No.: 114078/2002
PIaintiff(s), Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.
-against-UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERA C AND S„ INC., ET AL,
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General
Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against
defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants
there is no opposition, it isORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC
COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New Yorka iM i ?WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM KE P
/HA-By: James rhompson, Esq. I f By: Michael A. TanenbaS*fl, Esq.Attorneys for\laii\tiff(s) \f Attorneys for General Electric Company700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
Three Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102
OCT 01 2019
ox-ssa""*MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S >C .
OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILXNEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
IN RE NYCALPart 13
x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.‘f **^ W'W*
DONNA CASTORINA, AS EXECUTRIX FOR THEESTATE OF ROBERT CASTORINA AND ANNETTECASTROINA, INDIVIDUALLY,
Index No.: 11230/2001;123182/2001
.1Plaintiff(s), Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.i-against-
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERACANDS, INC., ETAL,
Defendants. —*-x
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “GeneralElectric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRICCOMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM
w -By: James/Thon/pson, Esq. By: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for Plaifitijffs) Attorneys for General Electric Company700 Broadway Three Gateway Center, Suite 1301New York, New York 10003 100 Mulberry Street
Newark, New Jersey 07102
F I L E Dotf QI
OFBCEMANUEL J. MENDEZ
J .S .C .
OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL—XNYCALPart 13
x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
IN RE:
RICHARD BABRAVICH AND BONNIE BABRAVICH,Index No.: 104028/2000
Plaintiffs),Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C>
-against-
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
AC AND S, INC., ET AL.,
Defendants.
-x
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General
Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against
defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants
there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC
COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
yiuiiWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM KEAL
rBy: Michael A. TanenbaumS3q.attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102
By: James wiornpEon, Esq,
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
F I L E DOCT 01 2019
. CLERK'SOFFICENEW YORKCOUNTYMANUEL J. MENDEZ
OCT 01 2010SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILX
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALPart 13Hon. Manuel J. Mendezx«•mum < » «.<
HELEN CHILARSKI and MICHAEL CHILARSKI asPersonal Representative of the Estate of JOHNCHILARSKI, Deceased,
Index No.: 190391/2010
May 2015 FIFO ClusterNapoli Shkolnik PLLC
Plaintiffs,
-against- UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
A.W. CHESTERTON CO., et al,
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant CBS Corporation, a Delaware corporation, f/k/a Viacom Inc.,
successor by merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, f/k/a Wcstinghouse Electric
Corporation (hereinafter “CBS”), requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to
Civil Practice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against defendant
CBS with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant CBS are dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
ii
Dated: New York, New YorkSeptember 24. 2019
NAPOLI SHKOLNIK PLLC TANENBAUM KEALE LLP
By: Robert Gitelman, Esq.Attorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Avenue, 1 1 th FloorNew York, New York 10017
By: Dennis E. Vega, Ekf.Attorneys for CBSThree Gateway Center100 Mulberry Street, Suite 1301Newark, New Jersey 07102
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL——Xmarrnt H» WWW •«*—» —» «
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALPart 13Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.x> m tm m
GERTRUDE BRILL, AS EXECUTRIX FOR THEESTATE OF HELMUT H. BRILL AND GERTRUDEBRILL,
Index No.: 190153/2011
Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.Plaintiff(s),
-against- UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
i
BORG-WARNER CORPORATION, ET AL.,
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “GeneralElectric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRICCOMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
zLLkJJAWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM
' f4 ~ ~ ' / f A*—By: Jame^vfhomffton, Esq. / / By: Michael A. TanenSaTTm, Esq .Attorneys for ylaintiff(s) ^ Attorneys for General Electric Company700 Broadway Three Gateway Center, Suite 1301New York, New York 10003 100 Mulberry Street
Newark, New Jersey 07102
LED012019
COUNTYClERrSO
NEWYORKMANUEL J. MENDEZ
J.S.C.
OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL.—X
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALPart 13
x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.’ W 1— m ****** <
VINCENT CARFAGNO, AS PROPOSED EXECUTORFOR THE ESTATE OF MARIO CARFAGNO, Index No.: 190256/2010
Plaintiff(s), Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.
-against-UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
I
A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General
Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRICCOMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
Cjl 3o / /?WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM KEA
fBy: JamestThomn)son, Esq.Attorneys for rlaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
py\ Michael A. TanenbaumTfisq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102
F I L E D01 2019
COUNTYCLERI'NEW YORK
'•sofMANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK OCT 01 2013
X PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILIN RE NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
xTHIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: Index No. 190329/2009
UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
RODGER MCCLELLAN
X
WHEREFORE, Defendant The Marley-Wylain Company sued incorrectly as Weil-McLain, a division of The Marley-Wylain Company (“Marley-Wylain”), requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Marley-Wylain with prejudice, and afternotice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED, that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Marley-Wylain aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkJuly 25JX&)
Josep Belluck, Esq.& Fox, LLP
ffcforneys for Plaintiff546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036(212) 681-1575
David J. Good6arl, Esq.LEADER BERKON COLAO& SILVERSTEIN LLPAttorneys for The Marley-Wylain Company630 Third AvenueNew York, New York 10017(212) 486-2400
Be
SO ORDERED, Dated: eroHon. Manuel S. Mendez
MANUEL J. MENDEZo
,so?f'c6
p!U U l. ~:j\
SEP 2 0 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK NYS SUPREMF C
NYCALI.A.S. Part 46(Mendez, M.)
XIN RE NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
XIndex No: 119472/2001This Document Relates to:
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
THOMAS J. MURRAY and PATRICIA MURRAY
X
WHEREFORE, defendant SIEMENS INDUSTRY, INC., as successor in interest to
SIEMENS ENERGY & AUTOMATION, INC., requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the
complaint and cross-claims against SIEMENS INDUSTRY, INC., as successor in interest to
SIEMENS ENERGY & AUTOMATION, INC. with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant SIEMENS INDUSTRY,
INC., as successor in interest to SIEMENS ENERGY & AUTOMATION, INC., are dismissed
with prejudice and without costs.
SqMtf inNew York, New York
Dated: 2018
U
Adanf Dreksler, EsquireWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York, 10003Attorneys for Plaintiffs
John 9/l/owarth/Esq|)/(ireKeith //: Babula, EsquireWILJBRAHAM, LAWLER & BUBA140 Broadway, 46th FloorNew York, New York, 10005Attorneys for Defendant, SIEMENS INDUSTRY, INC., assuccessor in interest to SIEMENS ENERGY &AUTOMATION, INC.
F I L E DSO ORDERED,MANUEL J. MENDEZ, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
OCT 01 2019
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
i •"
SEP 19 2019
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:Index No. 108518/02
SALVATORE CAMMARATA and ANTOINETTECAMMARATA
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Lockheed Martin Corp., hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the
complaint and cross-claims against defendant, Lockheed Martin Corp., with prejudice, and after
notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition,
ORDERED, that all claims and cross claims against defendant Lockheed Martin Corp.,are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED: TO f /(
Attorneys for PlaintiWeitz & Luxenberg700 Broadway - 7th floorNew York, NY 10003
Attorneys for DefendantLockheed Martin Corp,
Marshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747
F I L E DSO ORDEREDHon. Manuel J. Mendez J.S.C. OCT 01 20'9
COUNTY CLERKS OFFICENEW YORK
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK crp 19 2019
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:Index No. 108518/02
SALVATORE CAMMARATA and ANTOINETTECAMMARATA
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, BMCE Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the above
entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint andcross-claims against defendant, BMCE Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants
there is no opposition,
ORDERED, that all claims and cross claims against defendant BMCE Inc., are dismissed
with prejudice and without costs.
DATED:
Anna M. DiLonardoAttorneys for DefendantBMCE Inc.Marshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747
Attorneys-ftfr PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg700 Broadway - 7th floorNew York, NY 10003
F I L E 0SO ORDERED,Horn Manuel J. Mendez J.S.C.
OCT «1 mMANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
SEP 1 9 2013IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:Index No. 101085/02
RONALD G. POYFAIR
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDERoci
oc aastr*WHEREFORE, defendant, BMCE Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the above
entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint andcross-claims against defendant, BMCE Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants
there is no opposition,
ORDERED, that all claims and cross claims against defendant BMCE Inc., are dismissed
with prejudice and without costs.
DATED:
$5 for PlaintiffaKz & Luxenberg0 Broadway - 7th floor
New York, NY 10003
Andrew M. WarshauerAttorneys for DefendantBMCE Inc.Marshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747
A
/
SO ORDEREDHon. Manuel J. Mendez J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK SEP 19 2019
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:Index No. 104169/99
KEVIN F. RYDER and MARIE RYDER
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Lockheed Martin Corp., hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the
complaint and cross-claims against defendant, Lockheed Martin Corp., with prejudice, and after
notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition,
ORDERED, that all claims and cross claims against defendant Lockheed Martin Corp.,are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED:
,Colleen CroninAttorneys for DefendantLockheed Martin Corp.Marshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747
Attorneys for Plaintiff ^ *Weitz & Luxenberg fc> j L4iA ^ y(( ywv(f
700 Broadway - 7th floorNew York, NY 10003
SO ORDERED, P I L E Don. Manuel J. Mendez J.S.C.MANUEL J. MENDEZ
J.S.C. OCT 01 M19
CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORKCOUNTY
~r^F3E0i] rj iL::-I 1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK SEP 2 4 2019
XPART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
XThis Document Relates To:
THOMAS CANTONE, UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDERPlaintiffs,
-against- Index No.: 101788/2007
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC., et al.,
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE, defendant CENTRAL HUDSON GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION(“CENTRAL HUDSON”), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action,pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff’s complaint against
defendant CENTRAL HUDSON, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that upon prior notice to all co-defendants, and absent any opposition, all
claims and cross claims against defendant, CENTRAL HUDSON, be and the same hereby aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: Cj(^ j ( }New York, New York
v 'Arthur Pryatowsky, Esq-. ^WLENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER, P.A.Attorneys for Plaintiffs14 Wall Street, Suite 6BNew York, New York 100035(646) 746-8908
Ruthe Nepf, Esq.THOMPSON HINE LLPAttorneys for Defendant Central Hudson335 Madison Avenue, 12th FloorNew York, New York 10017(212) 344-5680 F I L E D
r\ OCT 01 2019SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel Mendez
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORKMANUEL J. MENDEZ
J .S .C4838-1558-1339.1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
SEP 1 3 2019
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:Index No. 115708/06
JAMES M. MARTIN
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, BMCE Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the
complaint and cross-claims against defendant, BMCE Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to
all co-defendants there is no opposition,
ORDERED, that all claims and cross claims against defendant BMCE Inc., are
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED:
# A- y y/;Anna DiLoriardo
try ObfJL, Attorneys for DefendantLockheed Martin Corp.Marshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747
Attorneys for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 Broadway - 7th floorNew York, NY 10003
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez J.S.C.
F I L E DMANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
OCT 01 2019
COUNTY CLERK’S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK SEP 1 9 2019
a
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:Index No. 115708/06
JAMES M. MARTIN
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Lockheed Martin Corp., hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the
complaint and cross-claims against defendant, Lockheed Martin Corp., with prejudice, and
after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition,1
ORDERED, that all claims and cross claims against defendant Lockheed Martin Corp.are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
&f *7 //1DATED:
LUC YXJ.Anna M. DiLonardoAttorneys for DefendantLockheed Martin Corp.Marshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747
Attorneys for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 Broadway - 7th floorNew York, NY 10003
i, Uv
SO ORDEREDHon. Manuel J. Mendez J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.F I L E D
OCT 0 1 2019
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
IFSE0E5' is!Rl.LTD
SEP 2 4 2019PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
xCONCHITA A. PASIER, as Executrix for the Estate ofEDWARD J. PASIER and CONCHITA A. PASIER,Individually, .
Index No.: 113101/1998111047/1998
Plaintiffs, UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER-v.-
A.C. & S., INC., et aL,including, J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIES CO.,
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant, J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIES COMPANY, requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section §3212, dismissingthe complaint against J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIES COMPANY, with prejudice, and after notice to
all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED, that all claims and cross claims against defendant J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIESCOMPANY, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs. F I L E DDated: New York, New York
(TlgWitit/ ° 2019 OCT 01 2019
/»t
NEW YORKHOLY aRatftck-Tmloy, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for PlaintiffsEdawrd Pasier, et al.(212) 558-5500
Eva S. Wayne, Esq.MALABY& BRADLEY, LLC) 50 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10038Attorneys for DefendantJ.H. France Refractories Company(212) 791-0285
DATED:r\SO ORDERED,
^ ifoDEZJ .S.C.
{00128882 . }
X:CLB/S9463.Aeeal/NOSJM
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XTHOMAS KIMKOWSKI, NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERPlaintiff(s),
- against - Index No.: 119400/00, 101889/01 &100787/03
A.C. &S. INC., et al.; NYCALI.A.S. Part 13
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE, defendant CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
F I L E Dwithout costs.
0C1 « 1 »
Phan Alvarado, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
itt* Esq.ShawneAttorneys for CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600
IBEOEPWoT!SEP 2 4 2019
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel Mendez
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
X
This Document Relates to: Index No.: 105495/2005
UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
BERNARD SMAHL,
X
WHEREFORE, defendant RSCC Wire & Cable LLC, improperly sued as
Rockbestos- Surprenant Cable Corp. f/k/a The Rockbestos Company (“The Rockbestos
Company”), requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against
The Rockbestos Company, with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is noopposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant The RockbestosCompany, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for RSCC Wire & Cable LLC, improperlysued as Rockbestos-Surprenant Cable Corp.f/k/a The Rockbestos Company.
LBy: By:John Dearie Daniel Gagliardi
515 Madison Avenue, 16th FloorNew York, New York 10022(212) 980-0404
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
PSa :u UiUtC; i!
jSO j)I^EI|g):0 Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C. SEP 2 4 2019OCT 01 2019 J 3f N y S SJPRL-Mc aJuRr -
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICEHEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
X
This Document Relates to: Index No.: 116399/2004
UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
ALFRED AUSTIN,
X
WHEREFORE, defendant RSCC Wire & Cable LLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc.,requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law andRules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against RSCC Wire & CableLLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no
opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant RSCC Wire & Cable
LLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc., are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
S p.372 Dl 1THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for RSCC Wire & Cable LLC, s/h/aRockbestos Inc.
(jdv\AJ L-dh\ John Dearie{AAAAJBy: By:
Daniel Gagliardi
515 Madison Avenue, 16th FloorNew York, New York 10022(212) 980-0404
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
oSO ORDERED: —*
Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.F I L E b S£pHy.sOCT «1 2 0«
COUNTV CLEW'S OFFICEV REW YORK
$UpD
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
X
This Document Relates to: Index No.: 116198/2002
UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
THELMO T. ALMEYDA, JR.,
X
WHEREFORE, defendant RSCC Wire & Cable LLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc.,requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law andRules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against RSCC Wire & CableLLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is noopposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant RSCC Wire & CableLLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc. are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: N York, New York
ZrzonTHE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for RSCC Wire & Cable LLC,s/h/a Rockbestos Inc.
By: By:Daniel Gagliardi
515 Madison Avenue 16th FloorNew York, New York 10022(212) 980-0404
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
SO ORDERED: [p>p/ru uL=, " -Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.F I L E D • v.
SEP 2 4 2019OCT 01 2019 PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
COUNTY CLERKS OFFICENR/V YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
X
This Document Relates to: Index No.: 116199/2002
UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
LESLIE P. ALTSCHULER,
X
WHEREFORE, defendant RSCC Wire & Cable LLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc.,requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law andRules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against RSCC Wire & CableLLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no
opposition, it isORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant RSCC Wire & Cable
LLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc. are dismissed with prejudice and without costs,
ork, New YorkDated: NppY i.
THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for RSCC Wire & Cable LLC,s/h/a Rockbestos Inc.
L- C(IW\AA }By: By:John Dearie Daniel Gagliardi
515 Madison Avenue 16th FloorNew York, New York 10022(212) 980-0404
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
''*W.*'S
SOPTCED. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C. ///
j
OCT 01 2019 /
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XNEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
IN RE: NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
X
This Document Relates to: Index No.: 190162/2009
UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
THOMAS LEAHY and EVELYN LEAHY,
X
WHEREFORE, defendant RSCC Wire & Cable LLC requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against RSCC Wire & Cable LLC with
prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it isORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant RSCC Wire & Cable
LLC are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
f/g// fBELLUCK & FOX II.Attorneys for Plaintiffs
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttomevs for RSCC Wire & Cable LLC
By: By:Jordan "oxl/Esq. Daniel Gagliardi, Esq.
546 Fifth A^ e, 5tl^Ffbor
New York, New^fork 10036(212) 681-1575
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
SO ORDERED:Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
F I L E DOCT 01 2019
COUNTY CLERK’S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
X
This Document Relates to: Index No.: 190404/2011
UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
DONALD MCCRINDLE and DOREENMCCRINDLE,
X
WHEREFORE, defendant RSCC Wire & Cable LLC, improperly sued asRockbestos-Surprenant Cable Corp. requests summary judgment in the above-entitledaction, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint
and cross-claims against RSCC Wire & Cable LLC, improperly sued as Rockbestos-Surprenant Cable Corp. with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is noopposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant RSCC Wire & Cable
LLC, improperly sued as Rockbestos-Surprenant Cable Corp. are dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
%MnF I L E D
OCT 01 2019LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LQ#UNTY CLERKS OFFICFAttorneys for RSCC Wire & Cable Lf^yftifjpRfterlysued as Rockbestos-S
BELLUCK & ftm LLPAttorneys for/P/aimiffs
it Cable Corp.
By: By:Andrew J. Mundo, Esq.ox, Esq.or
546 FifthNew York, New York 10036(212) 681-1575
ue, 5th Floor 137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
SO ORDERED:Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
X
This Document Relates to: Index No.: 101409/2003
UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
LISA S. MIRMAN as Personal Representative for theEstate of JOSEPH A. SANSO,
X
WHEREFORE, defendant RSCC Wire & Cable LLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc.,requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law andRules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against RSCC Wire & Cable
LLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no
opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant RSCC Wire & Cable
LLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc. are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
EARLY, LUCARELLI, SWEENEY &MEISENKOTHEN,Attorneys for Plaintiff
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for RSCC Wire &jG^ble LLC,s/h/a Rockbestos Inc.
By:By:BhaH Early" _ \ _/VU* clc.
360 Lexington Avenue, 20th FloorNew York, New York 10017(212) 986-2233
Andrew J. Mundo
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
SO ORDERED:Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.F I L E D
OCT 01 2019
COUNTY CLERK’S OFFICEHEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
x
Index No.: 190451/2011This Document Relates To:
RONALD N. RUBIN and RONNI RUBIN,Plaintiffs,
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO. andCBS CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant CBS CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, f/k/a Viacom Inc.,successor by merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania Corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse
Electric Corporation requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against CBS
CORPORATION with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendan
dismissed with prejudice and without costs. ji-£Bj C£RP(^TION are
OCT 01 2019Dated: New York.Neyy York,yim QUNTY LERK-S OFFICE/ WY
Kelly 4c Belnick, Esq.Tan^nbaum Keale LLPAttorneysfor CBS CorporationThree Gateway Center,Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark,New Jersey 07102
Ja^on-M. Weiner, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York,New York 10003
S FK ::rJSO ORDERED j - « i -— i •K ;.j
Justice Mendez,^SX
^^J.S.C.SEP 2 4 2019
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
x
Index Nos.: 100387/2008132167/1993106480/1993
This Document Relates To:
CHARLES BAGGIANO and LOUISE BAGGIANO,Plaintiffs,
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO. andFOSTER WHEELER LLC, et al.,
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER LLC requests summary judgment in the above-
entitled action, pursuant to Civ I Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint and
cross-claims against FOSTER WHEELER LLC with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants
there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant FOSTER WHEELER LLC are
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York,New York
—njjmirrPuiUiL, E.,q. Craves M - f:eracoooKel|y/^nick. Esd
J Tanenbaum Keale LLPAttorneys for Foster Wheeler LLCThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, NJ 07102
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
SO ORDERED
F I L E |jUSM ^J^NDEZ
OCT 01 2019
[Ff]V /7 fg?L_
SEP 2 4 2019f'JYS P-COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
NEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
xIndex Nos.: 100916/2008
109091/2001134985/1994
This Document Relates To:
RAYMOND MAZZA and MARYANN VESSIO, as Co-Administrators for the Estate of RAYMOND A. MAZZA,and RAYMOND MAZZA and MARYANN VESSIO, as Co-
Administrators for the Estate of FRANCES MAZZA,Plaintiffs,
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
F I L E D-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO. andFOSTER WHEELER LLC, et al., ocr oim
x COUNTY CLERys OFFWHEREFORE,defendant FOSTER WHEELER LLC requests summary judgmenN^^Yglppye-
Defendants.
entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint and
cross-claims against FOSTER WHEELER LLC with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants
there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant FOSTER WHEELER LLC are
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York„New York
CranesM.fcccHSoo Ny Belr>/k, Esq.r ^ Tanenbaum Keale LLP
Attorneys for Foster Wheeler LLCThree Gateway Center,Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, NJ 07102
-Berimin' Dorcho, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
flMpfiD50 0BDEREWy£S^zSEP 2 4 2019
FAIT TNYS SUPREME COURT i i
_
CDU L£=3 Y-? !i i ....
SEP 2 4 2019 (!
!^ supped !SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
' OVIL i
!
X
IN RE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
xThis Document Relates To: Index No.: 190009/2012
MARY T. GOODBAR, Individually and asExecutrix for the Estate of MILTON GOODBAR
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
x
WHEREFORE, defendant BLACKMER (incorrectly sued herein as “Blackmer PumpCompany”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against BLACKMER, withprejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is,
ORDERED, that all claims and cross-claims against defendant BLACKMER aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York3U5 , 2019
Charles M. Ferguson, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PCAttorneys for Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
en Connor, Esq.& BRADLEY, LLCMAL
Attorneys for Blackmer150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, NY 10038(212) 791-0285
/ \SO ORDERED, Dated:ie:
J.S.C.
0C T » i 2019COUNTY{00132517.}
R I F f TPSEP 2 4 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORKNYS SupREME COURT - CIVIL
X
NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
IN RE NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
xIndex No.: 190165/2011This Document Relates To:
HOWARD K. ROTBLAT, as Executor of the Estatesof ARNOLD GORDON and RHODA GORDON
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
x
WHEREFORE, defendant BLACKMER (incorrectly sued herein as “Blackmer PumpCompany”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against BLACKMER, withprejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is,
ORDERED, that all claims and cross-claims against defendant BLACKMER aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York, 2019
Charles M. Ferguson, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PCAttorneys for Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
en Connor, Esq.B^ & BRADLEY, LLC
Attorneys for Blackmer150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, NY 10038(212) 791-0285
L
SO ORDERED, Dated:
F' L E DJ .S .C .
ocroi
**vg£<***
2019COUNTY
{00132514.}
REO&r i svL.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK SEP 2 4 2019
X PART'13 .
1MYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILIN RE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
xThis Document Relates To: Index No.: 190273/2011
NILA M. HAUPTNER, Individually and asAdministratrix of the Estate of RICHARD W.HAUPTNER
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
x
WHEREFORE, defendant BLACKMER (incorrectly sued herein as “Blackmer PumpCompany”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against BLACKMER, withprejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is,
ORDERED, that all claims and cross-claims against defendant BLACKMER aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York, 2019
Charles M. Ferguson, Esq. erljen Connor, Esq.
^BY & BRADLEY, LLCAttorneys for Blackmer150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, NY 10038(212) 791-0285
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PCAttorneys for Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
MA
Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.MANUEL J. MENDEZ
J.S.C.
SO ORDERED, Dated:
F I L E DOCT 01 2019
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK{00132513.}
.TJ~,. >*sr*«
Ii
SEP 2 4 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIV-LX
IN RE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
xThis Document Relates To: Index No.: 190349/2011
AUDREY KEENAN, Individually and as Executorof the Estate of MAYLAN KEENAN
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
x
WHEREFORE, defendant BLACKMER (incorrectly sued herein as “Blackmer PumpCompany”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against BLACKMER, withprejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is,
ORDERED, that all claims and cross-claims against defendant BLACKMER aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York7,5 , 2019
Charles M. Ferguson, Esq>^WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PCAttorneys for Plaintiff (s)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
n Connor, Esq.!Y & BRADLEY, LLC
Attorneys for Blackmer150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, NY 10038(212) 791-0285
ai
L
SO ORDERED, Dated:Hon. MkMJnteiM2
J .S .C .
F I L E DOCT 01 2019
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK{00132512.}
U lLa V~? 1 : •• ; 1 •I,SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK SEP 2 4 2019X
* • •?; r i3NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
IN RE NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
N Y S 3U P R r ~ R Q« " v> T .
X
This Document Relates To: Index No.: 190264/2011
JUNE R. MACKEY as Executrix for the Estate ofFLOYD D. MACKEY, and JUNE R. MACKEYIndividually
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
x
WHEREFORE, defendant BLACKMER (incorrectly sued herein as “Blackmer PumpCompany”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against BLACKMER, withprejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is,
ORDERED, that all claims and cross-claims against defendant BLACKMER aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York, 2019
A2Charles M. Ferguson, Esqr M^ryehfn Connor, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PC MALADY & BRADLEY, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiff(s) Attorneys for Blackmer700 Broadway 150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, NY 10003 New York, NY 10038(212) 558-5500 (212) 791-0285
£p\Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S .c.
SO ORDERED, Dated:
F I L E DOCT 01 2019
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK{00132508.}
irpi F= .' pi.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
U •
SEP 2 4 2019X ;
P!- lC ;NYS SUPREME C'- vir.TNEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. ParfT3(Mendez, J.)
IN RE
xThis Document Relates To: Index No.: 190155//2011
JAMES MOORE, as Executor for the Estate ofCHARLES MOORE
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
x
WHEREFORE, defendant BLACKMER (incorrectly sued herein as “Blackmer PumpCompany”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against BLACKMER, withprejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is,
ORDERED, that all claims and cross-claims against defendant BLACKMER aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York, 2019
•AMaryellen Connor, Esq.M4 ABY & BRADLEY, LLCAttorneys for Blackmer150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, NY 10038(212) 791-0285
Charles M. Ferguson, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PCAttorneys for Plaintiffs)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
BI »A ihSO ORDERED, Dated:Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C .
F I L E DOCT 0 1 2019
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK{00132509.}
!r~Ifti if , ^ ; r -
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
, SEP 2 4 2019X
PART :3NYS SUPREME CC -JIN RE NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
RT - CIVIL
X
Index No. 108886/02ROBERT MESSIER and BARBARA MESSIER,
Plaintiffs, UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER-v.-ABB LUMMUS GLOBAL, INC., et al., includingNEW ENGLAND INSULATION CO.,
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant NEW ENGLAND INSULATION COMPANY requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section §3212,
dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against NEW ENGLAND INSULATION COMPANY
with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED, that all claims and cross-claims against defendant NEW ENGLAND
INSULATION COMPANY be are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York. New YorkSL LL 2019
(Richard L. uUendelsohn, Esq.MALABY « BRADLEY, LLCAttorneys for DefendantNew England Insulation Company150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, NY 10038
Mark Bibro,THE EARLY LAW FIRM, LLCAttorneys for PlaintiffsRobert Messier and Barbara Messier360 Lexington, 20th FloorNew York, New York 10017 F I L E D
OCT 01 2019Dated:SO ORDERED,
Hon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.C.MANUEL J. MENDEZ COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
NEW YORK{00132680.} J.S .C .
OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT • CIVILX
NYCALPart 13
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION —n x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
Rosemary Wossner as Executrix for the Estate of August F,
Wossner Jr. and Rosemaiy Wossner, Individually, Index No.: 126292/2002
Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.Plaintiff(s),
-against-UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERA. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO,ET AL,
Defendants. —x—WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General
Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against
defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants
there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC
COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
LLfi
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C.
XBy: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102
By: Jamed Thompson, Esq.Attorneys fonPlaifitifffs)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
F I L E DOCT 01 2019
COUNTY CLERK'SOFFICENEW YORKMANUEL J. MENDEZ
J.S.C.