Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court...

89
Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the selected date. The documents are displayed in no particular order. However, all of these documents are searchable. To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f (Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac); 2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the form field provided and press Enter or Return. In most applications, the first appearance of the index number, the word, or the phrase in the document will be highlighted. Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications, including browsers and PDF viewers.

Transcript of Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court...

Page 1: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and ordersfiled on the selected date. The documents are displayedin no particular order. However, all of these documentsare searchable.

To find a specific order, please use the Search/Findfunction within a PDF viewer.

1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f(Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac);

2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the formfield provided and press Enter or Return.

In most applications, the first appearance of the indexnumber, the word, or the phrase in the document will behighlighted.

Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications,including browsers and PDF viewers.

Page 2: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

-X

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALPart 13Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.x

Ida Flynn Individually and as Executrix for the Estate ofMartin E. Flynn, Index No.: 125539/2000

Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.Plaintiff(s),4

-against-iUNOPPOSED SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERAC AND S, INC., ET AL,

Defendants.xOIMOHH —

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General

Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against

defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants

there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC

COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New Yorkus

A UM KEALE LLWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.

YlBy: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102

By: JamesU'hoimjson, Esq.Attorneys for rlainfijffs)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

F I L E DOCT 01 2019

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORKMANUEL J. MENDEZ

J.S.C.

Page 3: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

PART 13NVS SUPREME COURT * CIVIL

XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13

x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.ROBERT EDWARD STEC,

Index No.: 1997-7495; 100557/1999;Plaintiff(s),

Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.-against-

UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

A. W. CHESTERTON CO., ET AL.,

Defendants.x4U——4w ~m-

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: "General

Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against

defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC

COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. EMBAUM KFULE L

/\

By: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102

By: Jamb£ Thompson, Esq.Attorneys fob Plofttifffs)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

F I L E DOCT 01 2019

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

Page 4: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01 2019PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT • CIVILSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

xNYCALPart 13

x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

»•**•*«

STEVEN M. SHERLOCK AND ADAM D. SHERLOCKAS CO-ADMINISTRATORS FOR THE ESTATE OFMILLARD D. SHERLOCK,

Index No.: 122391/2001

Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.Plaintiff(s),

i-against- UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

AC AND S, INC,ET AL,

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General

Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against

defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants

there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC

COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C.

qs Thompson, Esq.

Attorneysfor P/pintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

By: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102

By: J

F I L E DOCT 01 2019

MANUEL J.MENDEZJ.S.C. COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

NEW YORK

Page 5: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01 2019PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

NYCALPart 13

x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.IN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION•*«•»W«— j»

CARMELLA M. SCHUMACHER, ASADMINISTRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF GEORGER. SCHU,ACHER AND CARMELLA M.SCHUMACHER, INDIVIDUALLY,

Index No.: 111912/2003

Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C

Plaintiffs), ;UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

-against-

A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General

Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against

defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants

there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC

COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New Yorkqm 1,14TANWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C.

1'Ey: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102

By: JamV/ Thonroson, Esq.Attorneys f<\Plaijitiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

012019

COUNTYCLERK'SHEWYORK

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C. office

Page 6: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILX

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALPart 13

x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.BEATRICE PAPANTONIO, INDIVIDUALLY AND ASEXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF ALFRED L.PAPANTONIO,

Index No.: 125871/1999

Weitz & Luxenberg, P. CPlaintiff(s),

-against- UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

AC AND S, INC., ET AL.,

DefendantsX

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General

Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against

defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants

there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC

COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. T

By: Jamas Thompson, Esq.Attorneys/(>r Plckntiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

By: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102 toFI L

01 2019

COUNTYCLERK'SOMrwYORKMANUEL J. MENDEZ

J.S.C.

Page 7: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL— X

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALPart 13

- x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.CGARY W. MASI AND PHILIP G. MASI AS CO-EXECUTORS FOR THE ESTATE OF EVA M. MASI, Index No.: 106643/2001;

115469/2001Plaintiffs),

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. i

-against-UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

AC AND S, INC., ET AL.,

Defendants. —x

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General

Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against

defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants

there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC

COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New Yorkqt io/tAUM KEALE LLWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C.

70By: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102

By: Jame^/Thomplon, Esq.Attorneys for Plaint jff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

f \ L E°ft \ LOWr\

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.s.c.

Page 8: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01 2019PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

“XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13Hon. Manuel J. Mendez. J.S.C.—- x

JAMES LOKENBERG, AS PROPOSED EXECUTRIXFOR THE ESTATE OF ALBERT H. LOKENBERG ANDDOLORES E.LOKENBERG, INDIVIDUALLY,

Index No.: 110332/2008

Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.'Plaintiff(s),

IUNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

-against-

iA. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,Defendants.

--X

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General

Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against

defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants

there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC

COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York°U3oji4

TANENBAUM KEALJTLLPWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C.

Cy: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102

By: JameaThompson, Esq.Attorneys fo\Plaifitiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

F I L E 0OCT « * m

>S OFFICEC°UNTE OWMANUEL J. MENDEZ

J.S.C.

Page 9: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILX

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALPart 13— x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

GARY D. KING, LINDA BALLAR AND TIMOTHYKING AS CO-ADMINISTRATORS FOR THE ESTATEOF MATTHEW KING AND DOTTIE KING ASPROPOSED EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OFDOLLY KING,

?

Index No.: 107012/2005

Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.

Plaintiff(s), UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER-against-

A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,

Defendants.x9****++**«» >*<*« *M MM*

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General

Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against

defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants

there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC

COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New Yorktfho I.) *7WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM KEAtE LLP

zBy: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102

By: James'Tltomplon, Esq.Attorneys for rxiintitf(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

£0

,.sMANUEL J. MENDEZ

J.S .C .

Page 10: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01 2019PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

xI'M 'Mf W—*•+**—-**WMt < «»»•»»*« «•*•*«•*wnww'.WMtxi

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALPart 13

x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.•4*M *44-4» X* <*»-4» '•i':***

GARY LEE KLINDT, AS EXECUTRIX FOR THEESTATE OF HERBERT KLINDT, Index No.: 105764/2006

Plaintiff(s), Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.

-against-UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERA. O.SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,

Defendants. —X> •

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General

Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against

defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC

COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

HlloUXTANENBAUM KEAJLE LLWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C.

By: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102

By: Jarn^l Thompson, Esq.Attorneys fat' Plcynliff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

o,,so ce

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

Page 11: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13— x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

ERIC KOGEL AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVEFOR THE ESTATE OF DAVID KOGEL AND ISABELKOGEL, INDIVIDUALLY,

Index No.: 110255/2004

Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.Plaintiff(s),

-against- UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,

Defendants. —x*****m

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “GeneralElectric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRICCOMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

OIMU4WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM KEALE jLLP

By: JameWhonV&son, Esq.Attorneys forrlairyiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

By: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S .C

Page 12: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01 2019PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

-—xNYCALPart 13

x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

JOHN HAUGH, AS ADMINISTRATOR FOR THEESTATE OF THOMAS HAUGH, Index No.: 122281/2003

Plaintiffs), Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.

-against-UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERA. J. PEGNO CONSTRUCTIONS CORP., ET AL.,

Defendants*“-”X

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General

Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against

defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants

there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC

COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York±l3oj (4

TANENBAUM KEALE LLPWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C.*

Cy: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102

By: Jamel Thompson, Esq.Attorneysjoi( Plajntiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

\l^MANUEL J. MENDEZ

J .S .C.

Page 13: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01 2019PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK —xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13

x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.> «•* m «

MARIE L. COSTANZO AS EXECUTRIX FOR THEESTATE OF ANGELO E. COSTANZO AND MARIE L.COSTANZO, INDIVIDUALLY,

Index No.: 111780/2004

Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.Plaintiff(s), ;

UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

-against-

A. 0. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL., i

Defendants.-x

JWHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General

Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against

defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC

COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New Ycrk

1WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM KEA

By: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102

By: Jaroei Thompson, Esq.Attorneys Plaijitiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

tsa

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

Page 14: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

PART 13I NYS SUPREME COURT • CIVIL

-X4MIMII —* W» m WlIMM M mm —*+ 4m\

IN RE; NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALPart 13

x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.GERALD H. CAUGHELL, JR., AS EXECUTOR FORTHE ESTATE OF GERALD H. CAUGHELL, SR., ANDMARGARE JEAN CAUGHELL, INDIVIDUALLY,

Index No.: 105602/2004

Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.Plaintiff(s),

-against- UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General

Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against

defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC

COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

TANENBAUM KEAWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C.

J

By: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102

By: Janjfes Thompson, Esq.Attorneys wr Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

Page 15: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIC— ———— — —IN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13

x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.CLINDA LUMSDEN-ROBERTS, AS PERSONALREPRESENTATVE FOR THE ESTATE OF KENNETHF. CARPERNTER AND SALINA A.CARPENTER,INDIVIDUALLY,

Index No.: 119396/2007

Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.

Piaintiff(s),UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

-against-;

A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General

Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against

defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants

there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC

COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM KEALE LLP

By: James/Thornftson, Esq.Attorneys fonPlaijjtiJf(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

By: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102

\l&

****MENDEZ

J .S .C .MANUEL J-

Page 16: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILXIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13

x Hon. Manuel J . Mendez, J.S.C.ANNA L. VARGAS AS PROPOSEDADMINISTRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE OFMARGARITA CAMBRELEN,

Index No.: 101029/2007

Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.1Plaintiffs),

i-against- UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

>:

A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,

Defendants. ——x

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General

Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC

COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. AUM KEASLE LLP.

<5

By: JamesjThompson, Esq.Attorneys fo\piainliff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

By: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102

F I L E DOCT 01 20«

ft/JANUEL. J. MENDEZJ .S .C .

'S OFFICE

%

Page 17: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01 2019PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

—xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13— x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

FRANKLYN FARRIS, AS ADMINISTRATOR FORTHE ESTATE OF JOHN C. BOWEN, Index No.: 106669/2000

Plaintiff(s), Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C, V

1-against-

UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

*

A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General

Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against

defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants

there is no opposition, it isORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC

COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New Yorklink!

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C.

\By: Janrel Thompson, Esq.Attorneys fdr Plamtiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

By: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102

F I L E DOCT 01 ZOW

con»srcEMANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

Page 18: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILX

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALPart 13

- x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.M» — 4**** 4*4?«4*

EVELYN ORTIZ, AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THEESTATE OF GILBERTO ARCE (A/K/A GILBERTOORTIZ-ARCE) AND MARIA HERNANDEZ OLIVIO,INDIVIDUALLY,

Index No.: 127677/2002

Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C,

Plaintiff(s),UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

i

-against-

A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,

Defendants. —x

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General

Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC

COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York±119111

TANENBAUM KE/LE LLWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C.

By: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 0710

By: Jamis Thompson, Esq.Attorneys jck PlcAntiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

F I L E DCC!01 2019

COUNTY CLERK'NEW YORK

S OFFICEMANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

Page 19: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

XNYCALPart 13Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION — x

CATHERINE L. BENSON, AS ADMINSTRATR1X FORTHE ESTATE OF GUSTAVE A. BENSON,

-» »» ktm 4* ++****m4*m4»**m. «•»«•«•»••••«*•«•

Index No.: 113471/2004

Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.Plaintiff(s),

-against-UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERA. O.SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,

Defendants.x»»>liru>444

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General

Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against

defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants

there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC

COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New Yorkq tte LisWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM KEAJLE LU

By: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102

Thompson, Esq.By: JaAttorneys fir Pla\ntiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

F I L E DOCT «1 MW

'’S OFFICEC°UNTYN&KMANUEL J. MENDEZ

J.S.C.

Page 20: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

(BEOEWEPOCT 01 2019

PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13

x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.LOLA BIZAS AS ADMINISTRATRIX FOR THEESTATE OF STEVEN JAMES BIZAS AND LOLABIZAS, INDIVIDUALLY,

Index No.: 190118/2008

Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.Plaintiff(s),

-against- UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,

Defendants.•x

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General

Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRICCOMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New Yorkejsoju

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM KEALE LLP

By: James Thompson, Esq.AttorneysJbr Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

JBy: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102

F I L E DOCT ttl M'9-S OFFICE

C°untvn&MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S .C.

Page 21: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01 2019PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13

x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.rw-w*MPMMMCjH***'m&m****mm

BENDETTA BLANDO, AS EXECUTRIX FOR THEESTATE OF SALVATORE F. BLANDO ANDBENEDETTA BLANCO, INDIVIDUALLY,

Index No.: 100725/2003

Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.Plaintiff(s),

-against- UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,Defendants.

x

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General

Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against

defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants

there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC

COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P. C. T

By: JameVThomplon, Esq.Attorneys forSflaint\ff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

By: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102

MANUEL J. MENDEZ

Page 22: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALPart 13

- x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.ALAN IRGANG, INDIVIDUALLY AND ASADMISNITRATOR FOR THE ESTATE OF DORISIRGANG AND ALAN IRGANG, INDIVIDUALLY,

Index No.: 112676/2007

Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.Plaintiff(s),

-against- UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

!

A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO,ET AL,

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “GeneralElectric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRICCOMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New Yorkg l bO jjWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM KEALE

7?By: JamesfThonpson, Esq.Attorneys fonPlairniff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

Michael A. Tanenbaum, fisq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102

to<s\W

..soff'ctMANUEL J. MENDEZ

J.S.C.

Page 23: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT * CIVIL

XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13

x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.I'

lfrm if** — mmim********»-

CRAIG W. LAWSON, ESQ., AS PERSONALREPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OF JOHN H.MCGILL AND BARBARA MCGILL, INDIVIDUALLY,

Index No.: 190314/2011

Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.Plaintiff(s),

-against- UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

CARRIER CORP., ET AL.,

Defendants —-x1 — »i— 4M .>

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “GeneralElectric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRICCOMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York±I M MWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. TANENBAUM KEA

By: James Thompson, Esq.Attorneys for ffaintuf (s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

fey: Michael A. Tanenbaurn^Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102

F I L E DOCT 01 20«

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

•’S OFFICEC0UtmNEWV<W

Page 24: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

X4** <

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALPart 13

x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.mrw» «*•**«* fa*

ANNA C. MIMNAUGH, AS EXECUTRIX FOR THEESTATE OF JAMES MIMNAUGH AND ANNMIMNAUGH, INDIVDUALLY,

Index No.: 100652/2006

Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C. i;Plaintiff(s),

-against- UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,

Defendants. —x»**•*»» w — «

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General

Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC

COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P- C. TANENBAUM KEALE

$By: JanteslThowipson, Esq.Attorneys foAPlawtiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

Ytyf Michael A. Tanenbaum,Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102

MANUEL J- MENDEZ

Page 25: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01 2019PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK -—xmum im.mmi

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALPart 13

x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.<ir.OLGA MUNOZ-GALLUCIO, AS PERSONALREPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OF JAIME A.MUNOZ AND MARIA D. MUNOZ, INDIVIDUALLY,

Index No.: 190341/2011<

Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C,jPlaintiff(s), i

J-against- UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO,ET AL,

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “GeneralElectric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRICCOMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

SmJiiWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.

By: Jarroas Thompson, Esq,Attorneys jSr PlamtifJ(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

By: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark. New Jersey 07102 « to

*\ 1®"

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S .C.

Page 26: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILX

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALPart 13Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.x

MARIA OSORIO, AS PROPOSED ESTATE OF JOSEOSORIO AND MARIA OSORIO, INDIVIDUALLY, Index No.: 190364/2011

Plaintiff(s), Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.

-against-UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERA. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General

Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC

COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

°l Ml*)WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM KEAI/E LLP

By: Jamas Thompson, Esq.Attorneys j&r Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

©y: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102

f \ L t0MANUEL J. MENDEZ

J.S.C.

Page 27: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL-X

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALPart 13

- x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.CARMELA PERTICONE, AS ADMINISTRATRIX FORTHE ESTATE OF ANNIBALE S. PERTICONE ANDCARMELA PERTICONE, INDIVIDUALLY,

Index No.: 190427/2010

Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.Plaintiffs),

-against- UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

!

BELL & GOSSETT COMPANY, ET AL,

DefendantsI—x

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General

Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRICCOMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM KEA— /lA—By: JameVfjnompron, Esq. tBy:: Michael A. TanenbaumfEsq.Attorneys for nlaintijf(s) VAttorneys for General Electric Company700 Broadway Three Gateway Center, Suite 1301New York, New York 10003 100 Mulberry Street

Newark, New Jersey 07102

F I L E DOCT 01 2019

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C. COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

NEW YORK

Page 28: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01 2019PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

*54- —NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALPart 13

x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

IN RE:

«*•*•*

\\BETHANY S. SNYDER AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE

ESTATE OF WILLIAM S. SNYDER, Index No.: 190243/2009!

5Plaintiff(s), Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C, ii

-against-UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

:)

A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,Si;

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General

Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants

there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC

COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

QJJ4

;!

TANENBAUM KEAWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C.

By: Jame^ /Thompjfon, Esq.Attorneys fonPlaintiyfs)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

©y: Michael A. Tanenbaunvfcsq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102

F I L E DOCT 01 2019

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

Page 29: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01 2019PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURTSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

- CIVIL

-X*- — — — —IN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.x

FRANK VIGLIOTTI,Index No.: 105499/2001

Plaintiff(s),Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.

-against-UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

AC AND S, INC., ET AL.,

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General

Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC

COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New Yorkg rip l /<?WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM KEALE LL

By: Jame^jThornpson, Esq.Attorneys forYlairkiff(s)700 Broadway *New York, New York 10003

By: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102

F I L E DOCT 01 2019

. CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S .C. COUNTY

Page 30: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01 2019PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK —x

NYCALPart 13

x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.IN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION|it* MAt'wW 1

ERROL SILVERBERG, AS PERSONALREPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESATE OF HARRYSILVERBERG AND ERROL SILVERBERG ASPROPOPOSED PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FORTHE ESTATE OF ROSLYN SILVERBERG,

Index No.: 108537/2002

Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C. i

iPlaintiff(s), UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER-against-

*

AC AND S5 INC., ET AL.,

Defendants.——x

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General

Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against

defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC

COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM KEALE LL

By: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102F I L E D

By: James^ homvson, Esq.Attorneys for rlainmff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

ot f o i wMANUEL J. MENDEZ

J.S.C. pE'SOfFlCE

Page 31: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT • CIVILXIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13— x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

SYLVIA T. SENECAL, INDIVIDUALLY AND ASADMINISTRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF ARTHUR J. Index No.: 110579/2002SENECAL,

Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C,Plaintiff(s),

i-against- UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

i

AC AND S, INC,ET AL,

Defendants. —~xWHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General

Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRICCOMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York. New Yorkq / f e /v 7WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. TANENBAUM LP

James^ hornpfcon, Esq.Attorneys for Ylainhfff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

By: By: Michael A. TanenAttorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102

, Esq.

F I L E DOCT 01 2019

COUNTY CLERK’SOFRCENEW YORK

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

Page 32: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL—Xt*IW*W ** •*+•

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALPart 13Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.x

JOHN LOEPFE, JR., AS EXECUTOR FOR THEESTATE OF CONSTANCE LOEPFE AND JOHNLOEPFE, INDIVIDUALLY,

Index No.: 190342/2010

Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.Plaintiff(s),

-against- UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

:

CBS CORP., ET AL.,

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “GeneralElectric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRICCOMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM KEALE LLP

By: Janies Thompson, Esq.Attorneys jpr Plfintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

By: Michael A. Tane<B^um, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102

P I L E DOCT 01 2019

. CLERK'SOFFICENEW YORK

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S.C . COUNTY

Page 33: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

PART 13NYS SUPREME COURTX - CIVILIN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALPart 13

x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.SALVADOR MARTINEZ, JR. AND MILDREDMARTINEZ, Index No.: 120327/1999

Plaintiffs), Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.

-against-UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERA. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,

:

DefendantsX

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “GeneralElectric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRICCOMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

1L7UUWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. ENBAUM KE&LE LL

By: Jarnls Thompson, Esq.Attorneys\r Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

By: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102

F I L E DOCT 0 1 2019

COUNTYCLERK'SOFFICE-NEW YORKMANUEL J. MENDEZ

J .S.C.

Page 34: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01 2019PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT • CIVILSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK —xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13— x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.JEANNIE E. UNDERHILL, AS ADMINISTRATIVE

FOR THE ESTATE OF DONALD M. MCCORMICK, Index No.: 109417/2000

Plaintiffs), Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.-against-

UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERAC AND S, INC., ET AL.,

Defendants.X;

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “GeneralElectric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRICCOMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

UMllWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM KEAJLEJLLP

/X

James (Khomfcson, Esq.Attorneys forrlaimiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

By: By: Michael A. TanenbAttorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102

, Esq.

F I L E DOCT 01 2019

COUNTYCLERK’SQFRQELNEW YORK

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

Page 35: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13

x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.GERALD J. MCCORMICK AND MARIONMCCORMICK, Index No.: 190366/2009

sPlaintiff(s), Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C. i

-against-UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERA. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,

Defendants. —x

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: ‘‘GeneralElectric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRICCOMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York.New York

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM

By: Jarres Thompson, Esq.Attorneys jkr Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

By: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102

F I L E DOCT 01 2019

COUNTY CLERK’S OFFICENEW YORKMANUEL J. MENDEZ

J.S.C.

Page 36: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13

x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.NICHOLAS MINCELI AND ROSE MINCIELI,,

Index No.: 190087/2011Plaintiffs),

Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.-against-

UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL.,

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “GeneralElectric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRICCOMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New YorL New York

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM KEAJLE LL

By: Jarri^s Thompson, Esq.Attorneys for PIamtiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

By: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102

F I L E DOCT 01 2019

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Page 37: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01 2019PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT • CIVILSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK —xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.x'****** •

WARREN WILLARD OLIVER, JR. AND MARYOLIVER, Index No.: 190146/2011

<

Plaintiff(s), Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C*

f

-against-$'!UNOPPOSED SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERCARRIER CORP., ET AL.,

v

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “GeneralElectric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRICCOMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New YorkmmWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM P

JameY Thompson, Esq.Attorneys forPlafitiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

By: By: Michael A. Tanenbattm, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102

OCT 01 2019

TY CLERK'SOFFlQt.NEWYORKCCUNMANUEL J. MENDEZ

J .S .C .

Page 38: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALPart 13

- x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.1

LYNDA PADULA AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATEOF DENNIS F. PADULA, INDIVIDUALLY, Index No.: 101177/1999

Plaintiff(s), Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C. ;

-against-UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERAC AND S, INC., ET AL„

Defendants* .

x

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General

Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC

COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM KEA

iJBy: Michael A. Tanenbaum/csq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102

By: Jarres Thompson, Esq,

Attorneysfyr Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

OCl 'AK"5MANUEL J. MENDEZ

J.S.C.rsCfc*'

Page 39: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01 2019PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK — x

NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

IN RE: NYCALPart 13

- x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.DAVID WILLIAM PREMO AND JACQUELINE PELE,

Index No.: 113233/2002Plaintiff(s),

Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.-against-

UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General

Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against

defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants

there is no opposition, it isORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC

COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York. New YorkflfunWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM KEA

By: James Thpmpabn, Esq.Attorneys for Pmintijjf(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

By: Michael A. TanenbaumHEsq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102

F I L E DOCT 01 2019

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C. COUNTY Cl.ERF'S OFFICE

NEWYORK

Page 40: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

X

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALPart 13- x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

JOSEPHINE FERNANDEZ AS EXECUTRIX FOR THESTATE OF ANTONIO FERNANDEZ ANDJOSEPHINE FERNANDEZ, INDIVIDUALLY,

Index No.: 190435/2010

Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.Plaintiff(s),

-against- UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,

Defendants

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General

Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against

defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC

COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York. New York

°jmnWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM KE P

By: Jamis Thdppson, Esq.AttorneysJor Plafntiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

By: Michael A. TanenbAttorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102

, Esq.

eoMANUEL J. MENDEZ

J S C.

Page 41: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILXIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13— x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J .S.C.»'HUM :

ROXANA GARAY, AS ADMINISTRATRIX FOR THEESTATE OF JULIO C. GARAY AND ROXANAGARAY, INDIVIDUALLY,

Index No.: 12804/2011

Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.PIaintiff(s),

-against- UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

BORG-WARNER CORPORATION, ET AL.,

Defendants —x

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General

Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against

defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC

COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New Yo~kwinWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM KEALE LLP

XBy: Jam©sfrhon#son, Esq.Attorneys fonPlairmfffs)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

By: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for GeneraI Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center. Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102

OCT 01 2019MANUEL J. MENDEZ

J.S.C .'<g OFFICECOUNTYCLERI

NEWYORK

Page 42: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01 2019PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

-xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13

x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.STEVEN GERHARDT AND IRENE JOYCEGERDHART, Index No.: 117214/2006

Plaintiffs), Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C,i

-against-UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERA. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO,ET AL,

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “GeneralElectric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRICCOMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

SMMWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. TANENBAUM KEAL

By: JameVfhompabn, Esq.Attorneys forjttaintiff '(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

fiy: Michael A. TanenbaurAttorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102

F I L E DOCT 01 2019

COUNTY CfJERK’S OFFICENEWYORK

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

Page 43: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01 2019PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK —-xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.- x

PATRICIA M. GIBBS AS ADMINISTRATRIX FORTHE ESTATE OF GEORGE GIBBS AND PTRICIAGIBBS, INDIVIDUALLY,

Index No.: 190078/2010

Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C,Plaintiff(s),

i

-against- UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

j

vA. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL,

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “GeneralElectric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRICCOMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New YorkmmWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. TANENBAUM LP

XBy: JamestThomi/son, Esq.Attorneys forrlainkff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

By: Michael A. Tanenlku)m, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102

F I L E DOCT 01 2019

COUNTY CLERK'SOFFICENEW YORK

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S.C

Page 44: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01PART 13

NyS SUPREME COUR_J .SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK —xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13

x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.DENISE HAMM AS PROPOSED EXECUTRIX FORTHE ESTATE OF KENNETH HAMM AND DENISEHMM, INDIVIDUALLY,

Index No.: 190410/2009

Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.PIaintiff(s),

-against- UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO,ET AL,

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “GeneralElectric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRICCOMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM P

By: Jam8sThoim>son, Esq.Attorneys for Plaimiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

By: Michael A. TanenbaiTm, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center. Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102

F I L E D«««sssMANUEL J. MENDEZ

J .S.C.

Page 45: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01 2019 i

PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

x> •*** «

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALPart 13Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

•;\\

— XBERNARD F. HILL, INDIVIDUALLY AND AUBREYPRIMROSE AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FORTHE ESTATE OF RITA HILL,

Index No.: 190083/2010

Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.Plaintiff(s),

j-against- UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

JA. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO,ET AL,

Defendants.x

jWHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “Genera)

Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRICCOMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

*i m fiWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. TANENBAUM KEALE LLP

By: James! Thompson, Esq.Attorneys fd( Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

By: Michael A. TanenbAttorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102

F I L E DOCT 01 2019

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORKMANUEL J. MENDEZ

Page 46: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILX

NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

IN RE: NYCALPart 13

x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.ELVIN L. HOUSER, !

jIndex No.: 190325/2016

PlaintifF(s),Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.

!-against-:

/UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,yDefendants.

-xWHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General

j

Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRICCOMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

KM1SWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM KEALE LLP

2By: JaVres Thompson, Esq.Attorneys jipr PImintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

By: Michael A. Tanenba^h^ Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102

F I L E DOCT 01 2019

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S.C. COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

NEW YORK

Page 47: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01 2019PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK —xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13

x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.CONRAD J. FASSETT,

Index No.: 114784/2002 &106691/2002Plaintiff(s),

-against- Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C,

A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL., UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERDefendants.

-—x

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General

Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against

defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants

there is no opposition, it isORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC

COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkfimJjiWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM KEALE LLP

By: Jaraes Thompson, Esq.Attorneys jbr Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

. TanFnAttorneys for General Elebtdc CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102

By:

F I L E DOCT 01 2019

COUNTY cMANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

LEFTSOFFICENEWYORK

Page 48: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

OCT 01 2019XNEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

IN RE: NYCALPart 13Hon. Manuel J. Meh'dez, J.S.C:

PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT • CIVILX

GLORIA EMANUEL, AS PERSONALREPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OF ARTHURJAMES EMANUEL AND GLORIA EMANUEL,INDIVIDUALLY,

Index No.: 190389/2009

Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.Plaintiff(s),

UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

-against-

A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL,

Defendants.-x

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “GeneralElectric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRICCOMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New YorkJjMkWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM

By: Jarnsi Thompson. Esq,

Attorneys foS PIairyiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

By: Michael A. TaneTft^um, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102

F I L E DOCT 01 2019

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S .C . "SorncECCUNTYCLEW

NEW YORK

Page 49: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

RE©EB¥EO>OCT 01 2019

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL— xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13— x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

RONALD RICHARD DOEDEMA AND PATRICIADOEDEMA, Index No.: 11579/2002

Plaintiff(s), Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.

-against-UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERA C ANDS., INC.

Defendants.~x

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General

Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against

defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants

there is no opposition, it isORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC

COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York-New York

imnWEITZ & LUXENBERG,\P.C. TANENBAUM REAL

By: Jamek /Thomplon, Esq.Attorneys forylaintijfffs)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

Bfy: Michael A. Tanenbaum,"Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102 —F I L E D

OCT 01 2019SOFFICECOUNTYCUERK

HEW YORKMANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C .

Page 50: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13

x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.- «.*w

LAURA DILLION, AS EXECUTRIX FOR THEESTATE OF THOMAS DILLION AND LAURADILLION, INDIVIDUALLY,

Index No.: 190338/2009

Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C,Plaintiff(s),

-against- UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO,ET AL,

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “GeneralElectric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRICCOMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New Yorka/k/ixWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAU

2By: Jam^sfThomftson, Esq.Attorneys fonPlairlijffs)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

By: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102

FU- EDOCT 01 2019/A

COUNTY CLERKSOFFICENEW YORKMANUEL J. MENDEZ

J .S.C .

Page 51: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01 2019PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK — —xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13Hon. Manuel J . Mendez, J.S.C.X

MARY R. CROW, AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATEOF MILTON F. CROW, AND MARY R. CROW,INDIVIDUALLY,

Index No.: 111883/2007

Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.Plaintiff(s),

-against- UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO,ET AL,

Defendants.-x

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “GeneralElectric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRICCOMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM MEA

VpPBy: Jarnts^lThontoson, Esq. / / By: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq .Attorneys fo^Plairtiff(s) ^ Attorneys for General Electric Company700 Broadway Three Gateway Center. Suite 1301New York, New York 10003 100 Mulberry Street

Newark, New Jersey 07102

FILEDOCT 01 2019

COUNTYa.ERV'Si.NEWYORK

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S.C.

Page 52: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL——XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13— x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

1

>

CAROLE M. CLARKE, INDIVIDUALLY AND SUSANCLARKE AS EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OFGERARD M. CLARKE,

iIndex No.: 107334/2008

Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.Plaintiff(s),

f

i-against- UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO,ET AL,

Defendants.—x

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “GeneralElectric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRICCOMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New. YorkHimWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM KE P

By: JamessThornrpon, Esq.Attorneys for\lain\fff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

By: Michael A. TanenbakaJ, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102F I L E D

OCT Q1 2019MANUEL J. MENDEZ

J.S.C.

Page 53: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01 2019PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK —xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13— x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

ARTHUR C. CLARK JR. AND ARNITA CLARK,Index No.: 114787/2002

Plaintiff(s),Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.

-against-UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

A C AND S., INC., ET AL,

Defendants.-x******

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “Genera!

Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against

defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC

COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New YormtWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM LLP

By: Jarrtajf Thompson, Esq.Attorneys fak Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

By: Michael A. Tane:Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102

m, Esq.

F I L E DOCT 01 2019

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORKMANUEL J. MENDEZ

J.S.C .

Page 54: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01 2019PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK —xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13—~ x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

GABRIEL CINTORINO AND EVA CINTORINO,Index No.: 100081/2008

Plaintiff(s),Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.

5-against- iUNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

;;)A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,

$Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “GeneralElectric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRICCOMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New Yor! York

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. BAUM KMLE L

7XBy: JameYThompson, Esq.Attorneys for Plain fff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

By: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102

F I L E DOCT 01 2019

COUNTY CORK'SOFFICENPfcXQRK

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S.C.

Page 55: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

—XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13

x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.LISA VANSCHAICK, AS EXECUTRIX FOR THEESTATE OF ANDREW T. CATON, Index No.: 114078/2002

PIaintiff(s), Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.

-against-UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERA C AND S„ INC., ET AL,

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General

Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against

defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants

there is no opposition, it isORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC

COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New Yorka iM i ?WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM KE P

/HA-By: James rhompson, Esq. I f By: Michael A. TanenbaS*fl, Esq.Attorneys for\laii\tiff(s) \f Attorneys for General Electric Company700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

Three Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102

OCT 01 2019

ox-ssa""*MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S >C .

Page 56: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILXNEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

IN RE NYCALPart 13

x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.‘f **^ W'W*

DONNA CASTORINA, AS EXECUTRIX FOR THEESTATE OF ROBERT CASTORINA AND ANNETTECASTROINA, INDIVIDUALLY,

Index No.: 11230/2001;123182/2001

.1Plaintiff(s), Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.i-against-

UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERACANDS, INC., ETAL,

Defendants. —*-x

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “GeneralElectric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRICCOMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM

w -By: James/Thon/pson, Esq. By: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for Plaifitijffs) Attorneys for General Electric Company700 Broadway Three Gateway Center, Suite 1301New York, New York 10003 100 Mulberry Street

Newark, New Jersey 07102

F I L E Dotf QI

OFBCEMANUEL J. MENDEZ

J .S .C .

Page 57: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL—XNYCALPart 13

x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

IN RE:

RICHARD BABRAVICH AND BONNIE BABRAVICH,Index No.: 104028/2000

Plaintiffs),Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C>

-against-

UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

AC AND S, INC., ET AL.,

Defendants.

-x

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General

Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against

defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants

there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC

COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

yiuiiWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM KEAL

rBy: Michael A. TanenbaumS3q.attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102

By: James wiornpEon, Esq,

Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

F I L E DOCT 01 2019

. CLERK'SOFFICENEW YORKCOUNTYMANUEL J. MENDEZ

Page 58: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01 2010SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILX

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALPart 13Hon. Manuel J. Mendezx«•mum < » «.<

HELEN CHILARSKI and MICHAEL CHILARSKI asPersonal Representative of the Estate of JOHNCHILARSKI, Deceased,

Index No.: 190391/2010

May 2015 FIFO ClusterNapoli Shkolnik PLLC

Plaintiffs,

-against- UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

A.W. CHESTERTON CO., et al,

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, defendant CBS Corporation, a Delaware corporation, f/k/a Viacom Inc.,

successor by merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, f/k/a Wcstinghouse Electric

Corporation (hereinafter “CBS”), requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to

Civil Practice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against defendant

CBS with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant CBS are dismissed with prejudice

and without costs.

ii

Dated: New York, New YorkSeptember 24. 2019

NAPOLI SHKOLNIK PLLC TANENBAUM KEALE LLP

By: Robert Gitelman, Esq.Attorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Avenue, 1 1 th FloorNew York, New York 10017

By: Dennis E. Vega, Ekf.Attorneys for CBSThree Gateway Center100 Mulberry Street, Suite 1301Newark, New Jersey 07102

SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

Page 59: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL——Xmarrnt H» WWW •«*—» —» «

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALPart 13Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.x> m tm m

GERTRUDE BRILL, AS EXECUTRIX FOR THEESTATE OF HELMUT H. BRILL AND GERTRUDEBRILL,

Index No.: 190153/2011

Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.Plaintiff(s),

-against- UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

i

BORG-WARNER CORPORATION, ET AL.,

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “GeneralElectric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRICCOMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

zLLkJJAWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM

' f4 ~ ~ ' / f A*—By: Jame^vfhomffton, Esq. / / By: Michael A. TanenSaTTm, Esq .Attorneys for ylaintiff(s) ^ Attorneys for General Electric Company700 Broadway Three Gateway Center, Suite 1301New York, New York 10003 100 Mulberry Street

Newark, New Jersey 07102

LED012019

COUNTYClERrSO

NEWYORKMANUEL J. MENDEZ

J.S.C.

Page 60: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL.—X

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALPart 13

x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.’ W 1— m ****** <

VINCENT CARFAGNO, AS PROPOSED EXECUTORFOR THE ESTATE OF MARIO CARFAGNO, Index No.: 190256/2010

Plaintiff(s), Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.

-against-UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

I

A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL.,

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General

Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendantsthere is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRICCOMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

Cjl 3o / /?WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C. TANENBAUM KEA

fBy: JamestThomn)son, Esq.Attorneys for rlaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

py\ Michael A. TanenbaumTfisq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102

F I L E D01 2019

COUNTYCLERI'NEW YORK

'•sofMANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

Page 61: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK OCT 01 2013

X PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILIN RE NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)

xTHIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: Index No. 190329/2009

UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

RODGER MCCLELLAN

X

WHEREFORE, Defendant The Marley-Wylain Company sued incorrectly as Weil-McLain, a division of The Marley-Wylain Company (“Marley-Wylain”), requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,

dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Marley-Wylain with prejudice, and afternotice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED, that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Marley-Wylain aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkJuly 25JX&)

Josep Belluck, Esq.& Fox, LLP

ffcforneys for Plaintiff546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036(212) 681-1575

David J. Good6arl, Esq.LEADER BERKON COLAO& SILVERSTEIN LLPAttorneys for The Marley-Wylain Company630 Third AvenueNew York, New York 10017(212) 486-2400

Be

SO ORDERED, Dated: eroHon. Manuel S. Mendez

MANUEL J. MENDEZo

,so?f'c6

Page 62: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

p!U U l. ~:j\

SEP 2 0 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK NYS SUPREMF C

NYCALI.A.S. Part 46(Mendez, M.)

XIN RE NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

XIndex No: 119472/2001This Document Relates to:

UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

THOMAS J. MURRAY and PATRICIA MURRAY

X

WHEREFORE, defendant SIEMENS INDUSTRY, INC., as successor in interest to

SIEMENS ENERGY & AUTOMATION, INC., requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the

complaint and cross-claims against SIEMENS INDUSTRY, INC., as successor in interest to

SIEMENS ENERGY & AUTOMATION, INC. with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant SIEMENS INDUSTRY,

INC., as successor in interest to SIEMENS ENERGY & AUTOMATION, INC., are dismissed

with prejudice and without costs.

SqMtf inNew York, New York

Dated: 2018

U

Adanf Dreksler, EsquireWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York, 10003Attorneys for Plaintiffs

John 9/l/owarth/Esq|)/(ireKeith //: Babula, EsquireWILJBRAHAM, LAWLER & BUBA140 Broadway, 46th FloorNew York, New York, 10005Attorneys for Defendant, SIEMENS INDUSTRY, INC., assuccessor in interest to SIEMENS ENERGY &AUTOMATION, INC.

F I L E DSO ORDERED,MANUEL J. MENDEZ, J.S.C.

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

OCT 01 2019

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Page 63: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

i •"

SEP 19 2019

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:Index No. 108518/02

SALVATORE CAMMARATA and ANTOINETTECAMMARATA

UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Lockheed Martin Corp., hereby requests summary judgment

in the above entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the

complaint and cross-claims against defendant, Lockheed Martin Corp., with prejudice, and after

notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition,

ORDERED, that all claims and cross claims against defendant Lockheed Martin Corp.,are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED: TO f /(

Attorneys for PlaintiWeitz & Luxenberg700 Broadway - 7th floorNew York, NY 10003

Attorneys for DefendantLockheed Martin Corp,

Marshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747

F I L E DSO ORDEREDHon. Manuel J. Mendez J.S.C. OCT 01 20'9

COUNTY CLERKS OFFICENEW YORK

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

Page 64: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK crp 19 2019

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:Index No. 108518/02

SALVATORE CAMMARATA and ANTOINETTECAMMARATA

UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, BMCE Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the above

entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint andcross-claims against defendant, BMCE Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants

there is no opposition,

ORDERED, that all claims and cross claims against defendant BMCE Inc., are dismissed

with prejudice and without costs.

DATED:

Anna M. DiLonardoAttorneys for DefendantBMCE Inc.Marshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747

Attorneys-ftfr PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg700 Broadway - 7th floorNew York, NY 10003

F I L E 0SO ORDERED,Horn Manuel J. Mendez J.S.C.

OCT «1 mMANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

Page 65: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

SEP 1 9 2013IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:Index No. 101085/02

RONALD G. POYFAIR

UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDERoci

oc aastr*WHEREFORE, defendant, BMCE Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the above

entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint andcross-claims against defendant, BMCE Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants

there is no opposition,

ORDERED, that all claims and cross claims against defendant BMCE Inc., are dismissed

with prejudice and without costs.

DATED:

$5 for PlaintiffaKz & Luxenberg0 Broadway - 7th floor

New York, NY 10003

Andrew M. WarshauerAttorneys for DefendantBMCE Inc.Marshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747

A

/

SO ORDEREDHon. Manuel J. Mendez J.S.C.

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

Page 66: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK SEP 19 2019

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:Index No. 104169/99

KEVIN F. RYDER and MARIE RYDER

UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Lockheed Martin Corp., hereby requests summary judgment

in the above entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the

complaint and cross-claims against defendant, Lockheed Martin Corp., with prejudice, and after

notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition,

ORDERED, that all claims and cross claims against defendant Lockheed Martin Corp.,are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED:

,Colleen CroninAttorneys for DefendantLockheed Martin Corp.Marshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747

Attorneys for Plaintiff ^ *Weitz & Luxenberg fc> j L4iA ^ y(( ywv(f

700 Broadway - 7th floorNew York, NY 10003

SO ORDERED, P I L E Don. Manuel J. Mendez J.S.C.MANUEL J. MENDEZ

J.S.C. OCT 01 M19

CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORKCOUNTY

Page 67: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

~r^F3E0i] rj iL::-I 1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK SEP 2 4 2019

XPART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)

XThis Document Relates To:

THOMAS CANTONE, UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDERPlaintiffs,

-against- Index No.: 101788/2007

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC., et al.,

Defendants.X

WHEREFORE, defendant CENTRAL HUDSON GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION(“CENTRAL HUDSON”), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action,pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff’s complaint against

defendant CENTRAL HUDSON, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that upon prior notice to all co-defendants, and absent any opposition, all

claims and cross claims against defendant, CENTRAL HUDSON, be and the same hereby aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: Cj(^ j ( }New York, New York

v 'Arthur Pryatowsky, Esq-. ^WLENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER, P.A.Attorneys for Plaintiffs14 Wall Street, Suite 6BNew York, New York 100035(646) 746-8908

Ruthe Nepf, Esq.THOMPSON HINE LLPAttorneys for Defendant Central Hudson335 Madison Avenue, 12th FloorNew York, New York 10017(212) 344-5680 F I L E D

r\ OCT 01 2019SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel Mendez

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORKMANUEL J. MENDEZ

J .S .C4838-1558-1339.1

Page 68: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

SEP 1 3 2019

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:Index No. 115708/06

JAMES M. MARTIN

UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, BMCE Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the

above entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the

complaint and cross-claims against defendant, BMCE Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to

all co-defendants there is no opposition,

ORDERED, that all claims and cross claims against defendant BMCE Inc., are

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED:

# A- y y/;Anna DiLoriardo

try ObfJL, Attorneys for DefendantLockheed Martin Corp.Marshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747

Attorneys for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 Broadway - 7th floorNew York, NY 10003

SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez J.S.C.

F I L E DMANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

OCT 01 2019

COUNTY CLERK’S OFFICENEW YORK

Page 69: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK SEP 1 9 2019

a

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:Index No. 115708/06

JAMES M. MARTIN

UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Lockheed Martin Corp., hereby requests summary judgment

in the above entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the

complaint and cross-claims against defendant, Lockheed Martin Corp., with prejudice, and

after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition,1

ORDERED, that all claims and cross claims against defendant Lockheed Martin Corp.are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

&f *7 //1DATED:

LUC YXJ.Anna M. DiLonardoAttorneys for DefendantLockheed Martin Corp.Marshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747

Attorneys for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 Broadway - 7th floorNew York, NY 10003

i, Uv

SO ORDEREDHon. Manuel J. Mendez J.S.C.

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.F I L E D

OCT 0 1 2019

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Page 70: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

IFSE0E5' is!Rl.LTD

SEP 2 4 2019PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

xIN RE NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)

xCONCHITA A. PASIER, as Executrix for the Estate ofEDWARD J. PASIER and CONCHITA A. PASIER,Individually, .

Index No.: 113101/1998111047/1998

Plaintiffs, UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER-v.-

A.C. & S., INC., et aL,including, J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIES CO.,

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, defendant, J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIES COMPANY, requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section §3212, dismissingthe complaint against J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIES COMPANY, with prejudice, and after notice to

all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED, that all claims and cross claims against defendant J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIESCOMPANY, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs. F I L E DDated: New York, New York

(TlgWitit/ ° 2019 OCT 01 2019

/»t

NEW YORKHOLY aRatftck-Tmloy, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for PlaintiffsEdawrd Pasier, et al.(212) 558-5500

Eva S. Wayne, Esq.MALABY& BRADLEY, LLC) 50 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10038Attorneys for DefendantJ.H. France Refractories Company(212) 791-0285

DATED:r\SO ORDERED,

^ ifoDEZJ .S.C.

{00128882 . }

Page 71: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

X:CLB/S9463.Aeeal/NOSJM

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XTHOMAS KIMKOWSKI, NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERPlaintiff(s),

- against - Index No.: 119400/00, 101889/01 &100787/03

A.C. &S. INC., et al.; NYCALI.A.S. Part 13

Defendants.X

WHEREFORE, defendant CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

F I L E Dwithout costs.

0C1 « 1 »

Phan Alvarado, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

itt* Esq.ShawneAttorneys for CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600

IBEOEPWoT!SEP 2 4 2019

SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel Mendez

Page 72: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)

X

This Document Relates to: Index No.: 105495/2005

UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

BERNARD SMAHL,

X

WHEREFORE, defendant RSCC Wire & Cable LLC, improperly sued as

Rockbestos- Surprenant Cable Corp. f/k/a The Rockbestos Company (“The Rockbestos

Company”), requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against

The Rockbestos Company, with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is noopposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant The RockbestosCompany, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for RSCC Wire & Cable LLC, improperlysued as Rockbestos-Surprenant Cable Corp.f/k/a The Rockbestos Company.

LBy: By:John Dearie Daniel Gagliardi

515 Madison Avenue, 16th FloorNew York, New York 10022(212) 980-0404

137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

PSa :u UiUtC; i!

jSO j)I^EI|g):0 Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C. SEP 2 4 2019OCT 01 2019 J 3f N y S SJPRL-Mc aJuRr -

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICEHEW YORK

Page 73: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)

X

This Document Relates to: Index No.: 116399/2004

UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

ALFRED AUSTIN,

X

WHEREFORE, defendant RSCC Wire & Cable LLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc.,requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law andRules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against RSCC Wire & CableLLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no

opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant RSCC Wire & Cable

LLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc., are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

S p.372 Dl 1THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for RSCC Wire & Cable LLC, s/h/aRockbestos Inc.

(jdv\AJ L-dh\ John Dearie{AAAAJBy: By:

Daniel Gagliardi

515 Madison Avenue, 16th FloorNew York, New York 10022(212) 980-0404

137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

oSO ORDERED: —*

Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.F I L E b S£pHy.sOCT «1 2 0«

COUNTV CLEW'S OFFICEV REW YORK

$UpD

Page 74: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)

X

This Document Relates to: Index No.: 116198/2002

UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

THELMO T. ALMEYDA, JR.,

X

WHEREFORE, defendant RSCC Wire & Cable LLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc.,requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law andRules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against RSCC Wire & CableLLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is noopposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant RSCC Wire & CableLLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc. are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: N York, New York

ZrzonTHE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for RSCC Wire & Cable LLC,s/h/a Rockbestos Inc.

By: By:Daniel Gagliardi

515 Madison Avenue 16th FloorNew York, New York 10022(212) 980-0404

137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

SO ORDERED: [p>p/ru uL=, " -Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.F I L E D • v.

SEP 2 4 2019OCT 01 2019 PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

COUNTY CLERKS OFFICENR/V YORK

Page 75: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)

X

This Document Relates to: Index No.: 116199/2002

UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

LESLIE P. ALTSCHULER,

X

WHEREFORE, defendant RSCC Wire & Cable LLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc.,requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law andRules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against RSCC Wire & CableLLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no

opposition, it isORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant RSCC Wire & Cable

LLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc. are dismissed with prejudice and without costs,

ork, New YorkDated: NppY i.

THE DEARIE LAW FIRM, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for RSCC Wire & Cable LLC,s/h/a Rockbestos Inc.

L- C(IW\AA }By: By:John Dearie Daniel Gagliardi

515 Madison Avenue 16th FloorNew York, New York 10022(212) 980-0404

137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

''*W.*'S

SOPTCED. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C. ///

j

OCT 01 2019 /

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Page 76: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XNEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

IN RE: NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)

X

This Document Relates to: Index No.: 190162/2009

UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

THOMAS LEAHY and EVELYN LEAHY,

X

WHEREFORE, defendant RSCC Wire & Cable LLC requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against RSCC Wire & Cable LLC with

prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it isORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant RSCC Wire & Cable

LLC are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

f/g// fBELLUCK & FOX II.Attorneys for Plaintiffs

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttomevs for RSCC Wire & Cable LLC

By: By:Jordan "oxl/Esq. Daniel Gagliardi, Esq.

546 Fifth A^ e, 5tl^Ffbor

New York, New^fork 10036(212) 681-1575

137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

SO ORDERED:Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

F I L E DOCT 01 2019

COUNTY CLERK’S OFFICENEW YORK

Page 77: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)

X

This Document Relates to: Index No.: 190404/2011

UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

DONALD MCCRINDLE and DOREENMCCRINDLE,

X

WHEREFORE, defendant RSCC Wire & Cable LLC, improperly sued asRockbestos-Surprenant Cable Corp. requests summary judgment in the above-entitledaction, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint

and cross-claims against RSCC Wire & Cable LLC, improperly sued as Rockbestos-Surprenant Cable Corp. with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is noopposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant RSCC Wire & Cable

LLC, improperly sued as Rockbestos-Surprenant Cable Corp. are dismissed with prejudice

and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

%MnF I L E D

OCT 01 2019LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LQ#UNTY CLERKS OFFICFAttorneys for RSCC Wire & Cable Lf^yftifjpRfterlysued as Rockbestos-S

BELLUCK & ftm LLPAttorneys for/P/aimiffs

it Cable Corp.

By: By:Andrew J. Mundo, Esq.ox, Esq.or

546 FifthNew York, New York 10036(212) 681-1575

ue, 5th Floor 137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

SO ORDERED:Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

Page 78: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)

X

This Document Relates to: Index No.: 101409/2003

UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

LISA S. MIRMAN as Personal Representative for theEstate of JOSEPH A. SANSO,

X

WHEREFORE, defendant RSCC Wire & Cable LLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc.,requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law andRules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against RSCC Wire & Cable

LLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no

opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant RSCC Wire & Cable

LLC, s/h/a Rockbestos Inc. are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

EARLY, LUCARELLI, SWEENEY &MEISENKOTHEN,Attorneys for Plaintiff

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for RSCC Wire &jG^ble LLC,s/h/a Rockbestos Inc.

By:By:BhaH Early" _ \ _/VU* clc.

360 Lexington Avenue, 20th FloorNew York, New York 10017(212) 986-2233

Andrew J. Mundo

137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

SO ORDERED:Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.F I L E D

OCT 01 2019

COUNTY CLERK’S OFFICEHEW YORK

Page 79: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

xNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

x

Index No.: 190451/2011This Document Relates To:

RONALD N. RUBIN and RONNI RUBIN,Plaintiffs,

UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO. andCBS CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, defendant CBS CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, f/k/a Viacom Inc.,successor by merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania Corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse

Electric Corporation requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against CBS

CORPORATION with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendan

dismissed with prejudice and without costs. ji-£Bj C£RP(^TION are

OCT 01 2019Dated: New York.Neyy York,yim QUNTY LERK-S OFFICE/ WY

Kelly 4c Belnick, Esq.Tan^nbaum Keale LLPAttorneysfor CBS CorporationThree Gateway Center,Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark,New Jersey 07102

Ja^on-M. Weiner, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York,New York 10003

S FK ::rJSO ORDERED j - « i -— i •K ;.j

Justice Mendez,^SX

^^J.S.C.SEP 2 4 2019

PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Page 80: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

xNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

x

Index Nos.: 100387/2008132167/1993106480/1993

This Document Relates To:

CHARLES BAGGIANO and LOUISE BAGGIANO,Plaintiffs,

UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO. andFOSTER WHEELER LLC, et al.,

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER LLC requests summary judgment in the above-

entitled action, pursuant to Civ I Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint and

cross-claims against FOSTER WHEELER LLC with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants

there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant FOSTER WHEELER LLC are

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York,New York

—njjmirrPuiUiL, E.,q. Craves M - f:eracoooKel|y/^nick. Esd

J Tanenbaum Keale LLPAttorneys for Foster Wheeler LLCThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, NJ 07102

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

SO ORDERED

F I L E |jUSM ^J^NDEZ

OCT 01 2019

[Ff]V /7 fg?L_

SEP 2 4 2019f'JYS P-COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

NEW YORK

Page 81: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

xNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

xIndex Nos.: 100916/2008

109091/2001134985/1994

This Document Relates To:

RAYMOND MAZZA and MARYANN VESSIO, as Co-Administrators for the Estate of RAYMOND A. MAZZA,and RAYMOND MAZZA and MARYANN VESSIO, as Co-

Administrators for the Estate of FRANCES MAZZA,Plaintiffs,

UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

F I L E D-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO. andFOSTER WHEELER LLC, et al., ocr oim

x COUNTY CLERys OFFWHEREFORE,defendant FOSTER WHEELER LLC requests summary judgmenN^^Yglppye-

Defendants.

entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint and

cross-claims against FOSTER WHEELER LLC with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants

there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant FOSTER WHEELER LLC are

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York„New York

CranesM.fcccHSoo Ny Belr>/k, Esq.r ^ Tanenbaum Keale LLP

Attorneys for Foster Wheeler LLCThree Gateway Center,Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, NJ 07102

-Berimin' Dorcho, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

flMpfiD50 0BDEREWy£S^zSEP 2 4 2019

FAIT TNYS SUPREME COURT i i

_

Page 82: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

CDU L£=3 Y-? !i i ....

SEP 2 4 2019 (!

!^ supped !SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

' OVIL i

!

X

IN RE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)

xThis Document Relates To: Index No.: 190009/2012

MARY T. GOODBAR, Individually and asExecutrix for the Estate of MILTON GOODBAR

UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

x

WHEREFORE, defendant BLACKMER (incorrectly sued herein as “Blackmer PumpCompany”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against BLACKMER, withprejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is,

ORDERED, that all claims and cross-claims against defendant BLACKMER aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York3U5 , 2019

Charles M. Ferguson, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PCAttorneys for Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

en Connor, Esq.& BRADLEY, LLCMAL

Attorneys for Blackmer150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, NY 10038(212) 791-0285

/ \SO ORDERED, Dated:ie:

J.S.C.

0C T » i 2019COUNTY{00132517.}

Page 83: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

R I F f TPSEP 2 4 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

COUNTY OF NEW YORKNYS SupREME COURT - CIVIL

X

NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

IN RE NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)

xIndex No.: 190165/2011This Document Relates To:

HOWARD K. ROTBLAT, as Executor of the Estatesof ARNOLD GORDON and RHODA GORDON

UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

x

WHEREFORE, defendant BLACKMER (incorrectly sued herein as “Blackmer PumpCompany”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against BLACKMER, withprejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is,

ORDERED, that all claims and cross-claims against defendant BLACKMER aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York, 2019

Charles M. Ferguson, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PCAttorneys for Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

en Connor, Esq.B^ & BRADLEY, LLC

Attorneys for Blackmer150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, NY 10038(212) 791-0285

L

SO ORDERED, Dated:

F' L E DJ .S .C .

ocroi

**vg£<***

2019COUNTY

{00132514.}

Page 84: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

REO&r i svL.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK SEP 2 4 2019

X PART'13 .

1MYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILIN RE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)

xThis Document Relates To: Index No.: 190273/2011

NILA M. HAUPTNER, Individually and asAdministratrix of the Estate of RICHARD W.HAUPTNER

UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

x

WHEREFORE, defendant BLACKMER (incorrectly sued herein as “Blackmer PumpCompany”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against BLACKMER, withprejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is,

ORDERED, that all claims and cross-claims against defendant BLACKMER aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York, 2019

Charles M. Ferguson, Esq. erljen Connor, Esq.

^BY & BRADLEY, LLCAttorneys for Blackmer150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, NY 10038(212) 791-0285

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PCAttorneys for Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

MA

Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.MANUEL J. MENDEZ

J.S.C.

SO ORDERED, Dated:

F I L E DOCT 01 2019

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK{00132513.}

Page 85: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

.TJ~,. >*sr*«

Ii

SEP 2 4 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIV-LX

IN RE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)

xThis Document Relates To: Index No.: 190349/2011

AUDREY KEENAN, Individually and as Executorof the Estate of MAYLAN KEENAN

UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

x

WHEREFORE, defendant BLACKMER (incorrectly sued herein as “Blackmer PumpCompany”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against BLACKMER, withprejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is,

ORDERED, that all claims and cross-claims against defendant BLACKMER aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York7,5 , 2019

Charles M. Ferguson, Esq>^WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PCAttorneys for Plaintiff (s)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

n Connor, Esq.!Y & BRADLEY, LLC

Attorneys for Blackmer150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, NY 10038(212) 791-0285

ai

L

SO ORDERED, Dated:Hon. MkMJnteiM2

J .S .C .

F I L E DOCT 01 2019

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK{00132512.}

Page 86: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

U lLa V~? 1 : •• ; 1 •I,SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

COUNTY OF NEW YORK SEP 2 4 2019X

* • •?; r i3NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

IN RE NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)

N Y S 3U P R r ~ R Q« " v> T .

X

This Document Relates To: Index No.: 190264/2011

JUNE R. MACKEY as Executrix for the Estate ofFLOYD D. MACKEY, and JUNE R. MACKEYIndividually

UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

x

WHEREFORE, defendant BLACKMER (incorrectly sued herein as “Blackmer PumpCompany”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against BLACKMER, withprejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is,

ORDERED, that all claims and cross-claims against defendant BLACKMER aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York, 2019

A2Charles M. Ferguson, Esqr M^ryehfn Connor, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PC MALADY & BRADLEY, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiff(s) Attorneys for Blackmer700 Broadway 150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, NY 10003 New York, NY 10038(212) 558-5500 (212) 791-0285

£p\Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S .c.

SO ORDERED, Dated:

F I L E DOCT 01 2019

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK{00132508.}

Page 87: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

irpi F= .' pi.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

U •

SEP 2 4 2019X ;

P!- lC ;NYS SUPREME C'- vir.TNEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. ParfT3(Mendez, J.)

IN RE

xThis Document Relates To: Index No.: 190155//2011

JAMES MOORE, as Executor for the Estate ofCHARLES MOORE

UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

x

WHEREFORE, defendant BLACKMER (incorrectly sued herein as “Blackmer PumpCompany”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against BLACKMER, withprejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is,

ORDERED, that all claims and cross-claims against defendant BLACKMER aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York, 2019

•AMaryellen Connor, Esq.M4 ABY & BRADLEY, LLCAttorneys for Blackmer150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, NY 10038(212) 791-0285

Charles M. Ferguson, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PCAttorneys for Plaintiffs)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

BI »A ihSO ORDERED, Dated:Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C .

F I L E DOCT 0 1 2019

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK{00132509.}

Page 88: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

!r~Ifti if , ^ ; r -

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

, SEP 2 4 2019X

PART :3NYS SUPREME CC -JIN RE NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)

RT - CIVIL

X

Index No. 108886/02ROBERT MESSIER and BARBARA MESSIER,

Plaintiffs, UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER-v.-ABB LUMMUS GLOBAL, INC., et al., includingNEW ENGLAND INSULATION CO.,

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, defendant NEW ENGLAND INSULATION COMPANY requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section §3212,

dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against NEW ENGLAND INSULATION COMPANY

with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED, that all claims and cross-claims against defendant NEW ENGLAND

INSULATION COMPANY be are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York. New YorkSL LL 2019

(Richard L. uUendelsohn, Esq.MALABY « BRADLEY, LLCAttorneys for DefendantNew England Insulation Company150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, NY 10038

Mark Bibro,THE EARLY LAW FIRM, LLCAttorneys for PlaintiffsRobert Messier and Barbara Messier360 Lexington, 20th FloorNew York, New York 10017 F I L E D

OCT 01 2019Dated:SO ORDERED,

Hon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.C.MANUEL J. MENDEZ COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

NEW YORK{00132680.} J.S .C .

Page 89: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Oct 01, 2019  · oct 01 2019 supreme court of the state of new york county of new york part 13 nys supreme court-civil x in

OCT 01 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT • CIVILX

NYCALPart 13

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION —n x Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

Rosemary Wossner as Executrix for the Estate of August F,

Wossner Jr. and Rosemaiy Wossner, Individually, Index No.: 126292/2002

Weitz & Luxenberg, P. C.Plaintiff(s),

-against-UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERA. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO,ET AL,

Defendants. —x—WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, (hereinafter: “General

Electric Company”) requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against

defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants

there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC

COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

LLfi

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. C.

XBy: Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Attorneys for General Electric CompanyThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102

By: Jamed Thompson, Esq.Attorneys fonPlaifitifffs)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

F I L E DOCT 01 2019

COUNTY CLERK'SOFFICENEW YORKMANUEL J. MENDEZ

J.S.C.