Following this cover page are ... - Judiciary of New York · supreme court of the state of new york...

40
Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the selected date. The documents are displayed in no particular order. However, all of these documents are searchable. To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f (Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac); 2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the form field provided and press Enter or Return. In most applications, the first appearance of the index number, the word, or the phrase in the document will be highlighted. Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications, including browsers and PDF viewers.

Transcript of Following this cover page are ... - Judiciary of New York · supreme court of the state of new york...

Page 1: Following this cover page are ... - Judiciary of New York · supreme court of the state of new york county of new york in re: new york city asbestos litigation ... cv \ supreme court

Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and ordersfiled on the selected date. The documents are displayedin no particular order. However, all of these documentsare searchable.

To find a specific order, please use the Search/Findfunction within a PDF viewer.

1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f(Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac);

2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the formfield provided and press Enter or Return.

In most applications, the first appearance of the indexnumber, the word, or the phrase in the document will behighlighted.

Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications,including browsers and PDF viewers.

Page 2: Following this cover page are ... - Judiciary of New York · supreme court of the state of new york county of new york in re: new york city asbestos litigation ... cv \ supreme court

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

RONALD A. SINATRA and ARLENE SINATRA,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

A.C. and S„INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING &SUPPLY) et al.,

Defendants.

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

BEOEWEDPM moo

Xoi JPART 50

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Index No. 105405/99

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERAS TO DEFENDANTPEERLESS INDUSTRIES.INC.

WHEREFORE, defendant, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., with prejudice in this

action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

Rebejfah Lee, Esq.Attorney for DefendantPeerless Industries, Inc.Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP77 Water Street, 21st FloorNew York, New York 10005212.232.1300File No. 1863.26614

SO ORDEREDs

Justin WeitzT^cj. 0Attorney for PlaintiffRonald A. Sinatra and ArleneJJmatrgg;Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. ^700 Broadway orNew York, NY 10003 ^212.558.5500 3

Orn

"HMWTWMOOLTONJ.S.C.

r

4848-0701-8018.1

Page 3: Following this cover page are ... - Judiciary of New York · supreme court of the state of new york county of new york in re: new york city asbestos litigation ... cv \ supreme court

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

EILEEN ALBERTSON, Individually and as Administratrix: Index No.: 190100/08of the Estate of JOHN P. EGAN, i

Plaintiffs),NO OPPOSITION

SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER- against -

AMEC CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC.,individually, as successor to and formerly known as TheMorse Diesel Company and Morse Diesel International,Inc., et al }

NYCALI.A.S Part 50

Hon. Peter H. Moulton

Defendants.

WHEREFORE Defendant CROLL-REYNOLDS ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC.hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and

Rules § 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against Defendant CROLL-REYNOLDS

ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC. with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition

thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant CROLL-REYNOLDS ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC. be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs to either party.

Dated: White Plains, New York

Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A.110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, NY 10038-3927(212) 267-3091

10 Bank Street, Suite 700 55White Plains, NY 10606 ,(914) 286-6442

"3 <r

SO ORDERED,HON. PETER H, MOULTON

J.S.C.fn

{S0041741.1}

giLED

Page 4: Following this cover page are ... - Judiciary of New York · supreme court of the state of new york county of new york in re: new york city asbestos litigation ... cv \ supreme court

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE:NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

ERIC J. BUHYOFF as Personal Representative for theEstatesof JOHNBUHYOFF, JR.and JOANBUHYOFF,

Plaintiffs,

-against-A.C. and S., Inc. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING &SUPPLY), etal.,

Defendants.

NYCALI.A.S.Part 50Moulton,P.

KiCEBViDftAte# /, %oin

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Index No.: 119387/00

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER AS TO DEFENDANTPEERLESS INDUSTRIES. INC.

WHEREFORE,defendant, Peerless Industries, Inc.,hereby requests summary judgment inthe above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs

complaint against defendant,Peerless Industries,Inc.,with prejudice in this action,and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Peerless Industries,Inc., beand the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand withoutcosts.

Dated: New York, New York

\VL 016

AStepbemMfBabineczTisq.Attorney for DefendantPEERLESS INDUSTRIES,INC.LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP77 Water Street, 21st FloorNew York, New York 10005212.232.1300File No. 1863.16268

SO ORDERED

Pharr Alvarado, Esq.Attorneys for PlaintiffERIC J* BUHYOFF as PersonalRepresentative for the Estates of JOHNBUHYOFF, JR.and JOAN BUHYOFFWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. O700 Broadway §New York,New York 10003 &212.558.5500 rn?

rrt '-oo or

3rJ.S.CV -n

%o

4828-0549-3309.1

Page 5: Following this cover page are ... - Judiciary of New York · supreme court of the state of new york county of new york in re: new york city asbestos litigation ... cv \ supreme court

SUPREME COURT OFTHE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONThis Document Relates To:ELIEZER BARASCH, as Administrator ofThe Estate of STANLEY S. BARASCH,

Plaintiffs- against-

A.O. SMITH CORPORATION, et al ,

_ Defendants;

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Hon. Peter H. Moulton)

Index No.: 190055/2011

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, Defendant A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY (improperly

pled as A.O. Smith Corporation) hereby requests summary judgment in die above entitled case,pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs’ Complaint against

Defendant A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY with prejudice in this action, and

there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all Co-Defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant A.O. SMITH WATER.PRODUCTS COMPANY be and the same arehereby dismissedwith prejudice and without costs.Dated: Whil jins, New York

.,2017

Vaura B. Hollmgp^Esq.

Attorney for DefendantA.O.SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANYECKERT SEAMANS CHERJN & MELLOTT, LLCFour Gateway Center100 Mulberry Street, Suite 401Newark, NJ 07102(973) 855-4720

5 ae-crno r3-Crn cr

5nE. Berqui!Attorney for Plaintiffs (Lanier Law FirmTower 56126 East 56th Street, 6th Floor ^New York NY 10022 =*© B(212) 421-2878 -3

&

i

J

i .

SO ORDERED./ ^ RECEIVEDNYS SUPREME CT-CIVIL-1ST JD

HOR^lMf OOUTON{V0381695.1} J.S.V'* FEB 2 7 2017

HON. PETER H. MOULTONADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE

Page 6: Following this cover page are ... - Judiciary of New York · supreme court of the state of new york county of new york in re: new york city asbestos litigation ... cv \ supreme court

v '; ; : cv \SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK— -— -XIn Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates To:-X

BECHVED !

SEP 2 8 2016PART 50

[ NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL |

ROSE ANGELA KALACHMAN, as Administratrix for the Index No. 190240/09Estate of MELVIN KALACHMAN, and ROSE ANGELAKALACHMAN, Individually, NO OPPOSITION

SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Plaintiffs,-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al ,including MAREMONT CORP.,

Defendants,

WHEREFORE, defendant Maremont Corporation (“ Maremont” ) hereby requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Maremont with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against

defendant Maremont be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York» 2016

Adam-l^tfltrEsq.\\A lk^ WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.G

Attorneys for Plaintiff

#'

700; BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

SO ORDERED,

BczJordan BeMrfJsq,

KASowim BENSON, TORRES^FRIEDMANALPAttorneys for Defendant CorjxJ^1633 BroadwayNew York, NY 10019

mo-cm*r- »i

<ro:xS*5 &o =s

mom

r~

^Hon. Peter H. Moulton

HON.PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.

Page 7: Following this cover page are ... - Judiciary of New York · supreme court of the state of new york county of new york in re: new york city asbestos litigation ... cv \ supreme court

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

EILEEN ALBERTSON, Individually and as Administratrix; Index No.; 190100/08of the Estate of JOHN P. EGAN, j

Plaintiffs),NO OPPOSITION

SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER- against -

AMEC CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC.,individually, as successor to and formerly known as TheMorse Diesel Company and Morse Diesel International,Inc

NYCALI.A.S Part 50

Hon. Peter H. Moulton

Defendants.

WHEREFORE Defendant CROLL-REYNOLDS ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC.hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and

Rules § 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against Defendant CROLL-REYNOLDS

ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC. with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition

thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant CROLL-REYNOLDS ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC. be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs to either party. °Dated: White Plains, New York

Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A.110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, NY 10038-3927(212) 267-3091

ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC10 Bank Street, Suite 700White Plains, NY 10606

{S0041741.1}

SO ORDERED,

H6H.PETER H. MOULTON

(914) 286-6442

Page 8: Following this cover page are ... - Judiciary of New York · supreme court of the state of new york county of new york in re: new york city asbestos litigation ... cv \ supreme court

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

JOELLE GABRIELLIBUCCARELLI as Executrix forthe Estate of JOSEPH A. GABRIELLI,

Plaintiff,-against-

A.C. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING &SUPPLY, et al.,

Defendants.

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, J.)

Index No. 104669/2000

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER FORPEERLESS INDUSTRIES.INC.

tREOEBVEOMAR 01 2017

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

WHEREFORE, defendant, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., with prejudice in this

action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant PEERLESS INDUSTRIES,INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

and without costs.

Dated: New Yonk, New Yorkz j f b f r iHeather Janis Gaw, Esq.Attorney for DefendantPeerless Industries, Inc.LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP77 Water Street, 21st FloorNew York, New York 10005(212) 232-1300File No. 1863.9764

Suzanne Ratcliffe, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED

HO^P^RTMOULTON

sa5

mo 5.-<!•) cr

% ==

*nro

-nom

4852-6045-5739.1

Page 9: Following this cover page are ... - Judiciary of New York · supreme court of the state of new york county of new york in re: new york city asbestos litigation ... cv \ supreme court

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

JOSEPH ARNOLD, ET AL NYCALI.A.S. Part 30

Plaintiffs, (Moulton, P.)

FSEOiflVIDMAR .01 2017

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

- against -

ABB LUMMUS CREST, INC., ET AL

Defendants.X

Index No. 108421/01;108434/01

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, Defendant, Strahman Valves, Inc., and its

affiliates, subsidiaries, predecessors, successors in interest,

agents, heirs and assigns, hereby request Summary Judgment in

the above-captioned case, pursuant to CPLR § 3212, dismissing

Plaintiffs, Anthony Latacz's, complaint against Defendant,

Strahman Valves, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon

and crossclaims against

dismissed with prejudice

Qsu

LJL

oLL-u_o

-O §£' J5

ZZLZDCDO

notice to all co-defendants,

Defendant, be and the same

and without costs.

all claims

are hereby

Page 10: Following this cover page are ... - Judiciary of New York · supreme court of the state of new york county of new york in re: new york city asbestos litigation ... cv \ supreme court

Dated:

WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiffs110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, NY 10038212-267-3091

Kevin M. Berry, Esq:

SO ORDERED:

/2—HARDIN, KUNDLA, MCKEON &POLETTO, P.A.Attorneys for Defendant,Strahman Valves, Inc.110 William Street, 25th

New York, New York 10038(212) 571,-0111

By:Erik E. Harris, Esq

Honorable Peter H. Moulton

HON. PETER H. MOULTON

i

UJ

UL

UJoLu

i 1..X-S °<—» tO^- oc

UJ-Olaz C_D LU

>-h-asZDOo

2S

Floor

Page 11: Following this cover page are ... - Judiciary of New York · supreme court of the state of new york county of new york in re: new york city asbestos litigation ... cv \ supreme court

h'

i 1h '

.- J

; - 1 '

* ; {

> ,

%

i; .

t1

!

I

i

v *J -

1 s -•ft*

‘ . « * *

. ;v . > . n; * ;^":-v.: - 'G -'Cvv -C1' - .’ r " ? - •» '

> .

WWVW•OTIO-W..S71*WIY.#Jl*4-WK

Index No. 108421/01 Year

JOSEPH ARNOLD, et al

Plaintiffs

-against-

ABB LUMMUS CREST, INC., et. al.Defendants

' v - : .

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY.JUDGEMENT, MOTION AND ORDER

HARDIN, KUNDLA, MCKEON & POLETTO,. P.A.Attorneys) for Defendant, Strahman Valves,' Inc.

f;

Office Address & Tel No.:110 William Street,.New York, New, York

*

10,038(212) 571-0111

Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 130-1.1, the undersigned, an attorney admitted ,to practice in the courts of New YorkState, certifies that, upon information and belief and reasonable inquiry, the contentions contained in theannexed document are not frivolous.iW-JSSSSL®;_l®17 Signs

Print

Service of acopy of thewithinDated:

isherebyadmitted.

Attorney(s) for

PLEASE TAKE NOTICEI| Q that the withinis a(certified) true copy qf a . ‘

I NOTICE OF entered in the office of the clerk of theurithin named.Court onENTRY 1. «

I | | that an Order of which the within is a true copywUlbe presented for settlement to theNOTICE OF Hon. one of the judges of the toithinnamed Court,

SETTLEMENT Ot,<u M.on

Dated: t. -

Attomey(s) for

To:

Attorney(s) for

Office Address &Tel No.:

!' - I

r,

f;

kI' -

ii

c ~

5f.

1l{t -7slk-

V

:

= i

'-i

-i.

i-J

1;i -j

y -

IV .

Page 12: Following this cover page are ... - Judiciary of New York · supreme court of the state of new york county of new york in re: new york city asbestos litigation ... cv \ supreme court

i %

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IREGEOVE©MAR 01 2017

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

STEVE COTRONE, ET AL.This Document Pertains to: WilliamF. Bouchard, Jr.

Plaintiffs,

- against -

ABB LUMMUS CREST, INC., ET AL.

NYCALI.A.S. Part 30(Moulton, P.)

Index No. 110763/00

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

Defendants.X

WHEREFORE, Defendant, Calon Insulation Corporation, and its

affiliates, subsidiaries, predecessors, successors in interest,

agents, heirs and assigns, hereby request Summary Judgment in

the above-captioned case, pursuant to CPLR § 3212, dismissing

Plaintiff, William F. Bouchard, Jr. ’s, complaint against

Defendant, Calon Insulation Corporation, with prejudice, and

there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims

and crossclaims against Defendant, be and the same are hereby

dismissedL ith prejudice

o r—LU -0-J t

az

LL.wsC

oU-u

_ocogcx>-(Jixi

3EZDOO

and without costs.

Page 13: Following this cover page are ... - Judiciary of New York · supreme court of the state of new york county of new york in re: new york city asbestos litigation ... cv \ supreme court

Dated:

WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiff110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, NY 10038212-267-3091

Kevin M. Berry, Esq.

SO ORDERED:

HARDIN, KUNDLA, MCKEON &POLETTO, P.A.Attorneys for Defendant, CalonInsulation Corporation110 William Street, 25th FloorNew York, New York 10038(212) 571^011^ A

By:Erik E. Harris, Esq.

^fonorable Peter H. Moulton

HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.

Q

LL.

-OIor-ccST

LUS3u_LL.O

ar>-—OLU

2CZDOo

Page 14: Following this cover page are ... - Judiciary of New York · supreme court of the state of new york county of new york in re: new york city asbestos litigation ... cv \ supreme court

c . 1

:S'

.v >

I-

illK#p

.-> r:r

!• ; :j'V, rl

!v :

I

, -•: : ^v'';v, i Y £:v

' •** v- ' .5 >

. >

3,Or;::::r ;•; %> •: \ >Kv:

&£-

' ;

IndexNo. X10763/00 Fear

STEVE COTRONE, et al.

Plaintiffs

-against-

ABB LUMMUS CREST, INC., et- al.,

Defendants

•hNO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGEMENT MOTION AND -ORDER

HARDIN, KUNDLA, MCKEON & POLETTO, V . A .Attorneys) for Defendant, Calon Insulation CdEpojration ;

Office Address & Tel No,:110 Williani StreetNew York, New York 10038( 212 ) 571-Oill

Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 130-1.1, the undersigned, an attorney admittedtopractice inthecourtsofNetv YorkState, certifies that, upon information and belief and reasonable inquiry, thecontentionscontained in theannexed document are not frivolous. ' :

'

7Wf . February 8 , 2017 atgoesm^ .ftft , :1.A,"

PrintSigner's Erik : E . Harris, Esq. .

Service of acopy of thewithinDated:

~=a-

::c

Attorney(s) for

PLEASE TAKE NOTICEI Q that thewithinisa(certified) true copy of a.1 NOTICE OF entered in the office of the clerk of thewithin named Court on1 ENTRY

1 j | that an Order of which the withinis a true copy will be presented for settlement to theNOTICE OF Hon. oneof the judges of the withinnamed Court,

SETTLEMENT Ot. , at M.on

Dated:

Attorneys) for

To:

Attomey(s) for

Office Address &Tel No.:

;

isherebyadmitted.

Mr

sji ' i

ft ? ft:-7

T?

fif .

irI!

i?

;; isIAft

If

!1

I'

j

1!t ifIIk -Irftft\I

I1ft'

} :

I* ‘

9'M

Page 15: Following this cover page are ... - Judiciary of New York · supreme court of the state of new york county of new york in re: new york city asbestos litigation ... cv \ supreme court

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

THOMAS INGOGLIA, ET AL. NYCALI•A•S• Part 3

piolivi©]/ MAR 01 2017 I

Plaintiffs, (Moulton, P.)

- against -

ABB LUMMUSS CREST, INC., ET AL.

Defendants.X

Index No. 100748/98

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, Defendant, Calon Insulation Corporation, and its

affiliates, subsidiaries, predecessors, successors in interest,

agents, heirs and assigns, hereby request Summary Judgment in

the above-captioned case, pursuant to CPLR § 3212, dismissing

Plaintiffs, William Bollbach and Sondra Bollbach, his wife's,

complaint against Defendant, Calon Insulation Corporation, with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims

and crossclaims against Defendant, be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

QUJ-jUL

UJoLi_U_O

cr>-* UJ

OLU

JO

or

I

Page 16: Following this cover page are ... - Judiciary of New York · supreme court of the state of new york county of new york in re: new york city asbestos litigation ... cv \ supreme court

Dated:

WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiffs110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, NY 10038212-267-3091

i

Kevin M. Berry, Esq.^SO ORDERED:

Honorable Peter H. Moulton

HON. PETER H. MOUtTONJ.S.C,

HARDIN, KUNDLA, MCKEON &POLETTO, P.A.Attorneys for Defendant, CalonInsulation Corporation110 William Street, 25th FloorNew York, New York; 10038(212) 571^0111. jBy:

*

Erik E. Harris, Esq.

Q 25LJJ tNi

A-J mSJ1

LL. 3C

Uioio¬ta-o

p=>-—OUJ

rooo

Page 17: Following this cover page are ... - Judiciary of New York · supreme court of the state of new york county of new york in re: new york city asbestos litigation ... cv \ supreme court

I ;

- '• f

S i

\

' I

"

• K . -

£ ‘ -

-•: . . :

- .** * * ’

sstms*s .

IwtecNo. 100748/98 Year .v . ; '

THOMAS INGOGLIA, ET AL.Plaintiffs

-against-ABB BUMMUSS CREST, INC., ET AL.,

Defendants

: •'

. •

sssssass- -V.

:x

. . „ .. ... .. . ... .. . ^ . ... . ,.v - „ . . ., ,

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGEMENT MOTION AND ORDER• - - -T -

- VHARDIN, KUNDLA, MCKEON & POLETTO, P,A

Attomey(s) for Defendant, Calon Insulation.Corporation

Office Address & Tel No,:110 William-:Street.'. “ r

.New York, New York 10038'

(212) - 571-0111' ' " "

Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 130-1.1, the undersigned, an attorney admitted to practice in the courts of New YorkState, certifies that, upon information and belief and reasonable inquiry, the contentions oontatiied in theannexed document are not frivolousDated:J.± t^Jj..JS.17 Sign

PrintSigner's

Serviceof acopy of thewithin

Dated:

ishereby admitted,,

Attorney(s) for

PLEASE TAKE NOTICEI [” ] that thewithinisa(certified) truecopy of a|NOTICE OF entered in the office of the clerk of the within named Court on

l that an Order of which the within is a true copy will be presented for settlement to theNOTCEOF Eon. one of the judges of the unthinnamed Court,

SETTLEMENT Ot ,at M.onDated:

Attorney)s) for

lb:

Attorney(s) for

Office Address & Tel.No.:

v«.

7

Tii - Vs

%vr

I;l. •

i?

1'

S

I -'

arf

I

!!

i'

}-r-

f.

i

i-t'

?j

•t

'M

Page 18: Following this cover page are ... - Judiciary of New York · supreme court of the state of new york county of new york in re: new york city asbestos litigation ... cv \ supreme court

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

I1

JOSEPH ARNOLD, ET AL NYCALI.A.S. Part 30

Plaintiffs, (Moulton, P.)

(FSEOilMEE) IMAR 01 2017

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

- against -ABB LUMMUS CREST, INC., ET AL

Defendants.X

Index No. 108421/01

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, Defendant, Calon Insulation Corporation, and its

affiliates, subsidiaries, predecessors, successors in interest,

agents, heirs and assigns, hereby request Summary Judgment in

the above-captioned case, pursuant to CPLR § 3212, dismissing

Plaintiffs, Anthony Latacz's, complaint against Defendant, Calon

Insulation Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims

and crossclaims against Defendant, be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without

Q iUJ

li¬

fe

JDiCO

c£>-UJ

UbJ>*

1—2CCDOCD

Z

costs.

Page 19: Following this cover page are ... - Judiciary of New York · supreme court of the state of new york county of new york in re: new york city asbestos litigation ... cv \ supreme court

f

Dated:

WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiffs110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, NY 10038212-267-3091

Kevin M. Berry, Esq.

SO ORDERED:

HARDIN, KUNDLA, MCKEON &POLETTO, P.A.Attorneys for Defendant, CalonInsulation Corporation110 William Street, 25th FloorNew York, New York 10038(212) 5p.-01M 1

By:Erik E. Harris, Esq.

Honorable Peter H. Moulton

HON.PETER H. MOULTON

OLU

LL.

LUOU.Li.

~ o

-Dloc

COyzocz>-UJ—OUi>-H-rooo

ac

Page 20: Following this cover page are ... - Judiciary of New York · supreme court of the state of new york county of new york in re: new york city asbestos litigation ... cv \ supreme court

CheckApplicableBox

* > v%

1

IndexNo. 108421/01 Year

W1»WM> •07W4L•PTItfrGV.WlM-WX

JOSEPH ARNOLD, et al

Plaintiffs

-against-ABB LUMMUS CREST, INC., et. al,

Defendants

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGEMENT MOTION AND ORDER

HARDIN, KUNDLA, MCKEON & POLETTO, P.A.Attorneys) for Defendant, Calon Insulation Corporation

Office Address & Tel No.:110 William StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 571-0111

Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 130-1.1, the undersigned, an attorney admitted to practice in the courts of New YorkState, certifies that, upon information and belief and reasonable inquiry, the contentions contained in theannexed document are not frivolous.jw..Ig5£Ey.i-/.J°17 siB-to*

Service of acopy of thewithin is hereby admitted.Dated:

Attomey(s) for

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE| | that thewithinis a(certified) true copy of a

NOTICE OF entered in the office of the clerk of the within named Court onENTRY

| | that an Order of which the within is a true copy will be presented for settlement to theNOTICE OF Hon- oneof the fudges of the within named Court,

SETTLEMENT aton , at M. •

Dated:

Attomey(s) for

lb: Office Address & Tel, No.:

Attorney(s) for

Page 21: Following this cover page are ... - Judiciary of New York · supreme court of the state of new york county of new york in re: new york city asbestos litigation ... cv \ supreme court

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF KINGS

CONRAD A. AMISANO, ET AL NYCALThis Document Pertains to: Frank I.A.S. Part 30Galligan (Moulton, P.)

Plaintiffs, Index No. 103534/00

BECEIYEDMAR 01 2017

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

- against -

ABB LUMMUS CREST, INC., ET AL

Defendants.X

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, Defendant, Calon Insulation Corporation, and its

affiliates, subsidiaries, predecessors, successors in interest,

agents, heirs and assigns, hereby request Summary Judgment in

the above-captioned case, pursuant to CPLR § 3212, dismissing

Plaintiff, Frank A. Galligan's, complaint against Defendant,

Calon Insulation Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims

and crossclaims against Defendant, be and the same are hereby

ooczac-Hrno

opcP3CPO-n-nom

as"T1

zS**.1 F<r m&Ca o

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Page 22: Following this cover page are ... - Judiciary of New York · supreme court of the state of new york county of new york in re: new york city asbestos litigation ... cv \ supreme court

Page - 2 -January 11, 2017

Dated:

WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiff110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, NY 10038212-267-3091

Kevin M. Berry, Esq!

HARDIN, KUNDLA, MCKEON &POLETTO, P.A.Attorneys for Defendant, CalonInsulation Corporation110 William Street, 25th FloorNew York, New York 10038(212) 571-0111 i

By: ‘viy H iM—Erik E. Harris, Esq.

SO ORDERED:

^onorable Peter H. Moulton

HON. PETER H. MOULTON

=?UL

UOU-—- D-u- o<S)a:_ SCOJD CC>-I UJ

S OUJ2C

V—acIDoo

Page 23: Following this cover page are ... - Judiciary of New York · supreme court of the state of new york county of new york in re: new york city asbestos litigation ... cv \ supreme court

[-

I

ir-

% 9

* * r * ?’ * r is

*s.srsMHIMtU

IndexNo. 103534/00 Year

CONRAD A. AMISANO, et al

plaintiffs

-against-ABB LUMMUS CREST, INC., et al,

Defendants

;

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGEMENT MOTION AND ORDER

HARDIN, KUNDLA, MCKEON & POLETTO, P.A.Attorneys) for Defendant, Calon Insulation Corporation

Office Address & Teh No,:110 William StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 571-0111

Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 130-1.1, the undersigned, an attorney admitted to practice in the courts of New YorkState, certifies that, upon information and belief and reasonable inquiry, the contentions contained in theannexed document are not frivolous

Mbroary 8. - 8017 Signature....... ,

Print

Service of acopy of diewithinDated:

is hereby admitted.

Attorney(s) for

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE| [3 that thewithinisa(certified) truecopyofa

JJ NOTICE OF entered in the office of the clerk of thewithin named Court on1 ENTRY

1 j~~] that anOrder of which the withinis a true copy wiU be presented for settlement to theNOTICE OF Non. oneof the judges of the withinnamed Court,

SETTLEMENT Ot ,at M.on

Dated:

Attomey(s) for

7b: Office Address & Tel. No.:

Attorney(s) for

A.

4 ,::

i

i;

i.

Page 24: Following this cover page are ... - Judiciary of New York · supreme court of the state of new york county of new york in re: new york city asbestos litigation ... cv \ supreme court

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

RICHARD V. FARACI, ET AL. NYCALI.A.S. Part 30

Plaintiff, (Moulton, P.)

RECEIVEDMAR 01 2017

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

- against -ABB LUMMUS CREST, INC., ET AL.

Index No. 123656/00

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

Defendants.X

WHEREFORE, Defendant, Calon Insulation Corporation, and its

affiliates, subsidiaries, predecessors, successors in interest,

agents, heirs and assigns, hereby request Summary Judgment in

the above-captioned case, pursuant to CPLR § 3212, dismissing

Plaintiff, Joseph V. DeVivo's, complaint against Defendant,

Calon Insulation Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims

and crossclaims against Defendant, be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

oL&J— JLs_

tilOU-. u.S o

-Ooc oC5zZDoo

Page 25: Following this cover page are ... - Judiciary of New York · supreme court of the state of new york county of new york in re: new york city asbestos litigation ... cv \ supreme court

Dated:

WILENTZ, GOLDMAN Sc SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiff110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, NY 10038212-267-3091

By: JCA-0Kevin M. Berry, Esq. *

SO ORDERED:

HARDIN, KUNDLA, MCKEON &POLETTO, P.A.Attorneys for Defendant, CalonInsulation Corporation110 William Street, 25th FloorNew York, New York 10038(212) 57^-0111 I

By:Erik E. Harris, Esq.

/2- Peter H. MoultonI^onorableHON.PETER H.MOULTON4.S.C. O

Ocz

morn-<TO

o-nHom

FILEDHAR-ban

Page 26: Following this cover page are ... - Judiciary of New York · supreme court of the state of new york county of new york in re: new york city asbestos litigation ... cv \ supreme court

V * -*>

t. # * * *

r

- - s ,.. . • • •

'.-V-f-jAr- - : > - .

? !s -J

' * :

C :7T ‘I3

r * - -f' L" .

a ... - **V : 1 :* . ,T

A;*?AP : •' *« b - :::'A. AAtAAAAAAtfAAKAt- A

; ,

. win*1

Index No. 123656/GO Year' •

' ‘ ; • - - ’ ... - • ' '

- I . . .-. • ’ -i-

% -

RICHARD V. FARACI, ET AL.plaintiff

-against-

ABB LUMMUS CREST, INC., ET- ALA,

Defendants

: ? . . .- - . . i ,

‘ - V . . - .A J - '

• - . s • 7

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGEMENT MOTION AND ORDER

HARDIN, KUNDLA, MCKEON & POLETTG, P.A.Attorneys) for Defendant, Calon Insulation Corporation

Office Address &Tel No.:110'William Street : ; - ..

New York, New York: 106.38‘

(212) 571-0111 - _A ' - - .’ ;f-

'7 '

':r_ _ _

r

Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 130-1.1, the undersigned, ah attorney admitted to practicein thecourtsof New York.State, certifies that, upon information and belief and reasonable inquiry, the contentions contained in the Aannexed document are not frivolous.ikded^ lL.^.11 - Signature,

;A;¥W ,.I..-:..., ... - 1 - '

Print Signer’s , w; V

Service of acopy of thewithinDated:

:*4.

j, ' > ** A -t * A A- ’ 1 A -, * /

' • - ' v '- v - .

ishereby admitted.

:.

Attorney(s) for -PLEASE TAKE NOTICE| Q that the withinisa(certified) true copy of a|NOTICE OF entered inthe office of the clerk of the within named Court on1 ENTRY

1 1 [ that anOrder of which the within is a true copy will be presented forsettlement to theNOTICE OF Hon. one of the judges of ttevnlMnimined Court,

SETTLEMENT Oton M.

Dated:

Attomeyfs) for

2b: Office Address & Tel No.:

- A- A A '' A A A-:-

- AA AAA: i- > ‘;;-T -- *

. JbA -\ ,|hA|

*

A ;A!• Av A-

iA

A

i:

- f ;

1

rtiisfSfSit

IiSi!Sij!

I!h

It

!i!;;

AAAa'

v

'<; r -%

';r. •

A* .

Attorney(s) for

Page 27: Following this cover page are ... - Judiciary of New York · supreme court of the state of new york county of new york in re: new york city asbestos litigation ... cv \ supreme court

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE 0.COUNTY OF NEW YORK TTCEtJ

MAR - b zon MAR 01 2017

ALFONSE FORTUNATO, ET AL NYCAL¥J8£S. Part 30

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

(Moulton/ P.)

against Index No. 127150/02

ABB LUMMUS CREST/ INC., ET AL NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

Defendants.X

WHEREFORE, Defendant, Calon Insulation Corporation, and its

affiliates, subsidiaries, predecessors, successors in interest,

agents, heirs and assigns, hereby request Summary Judgment in

the above-captioned case, pursuant to CPLR § 3212, dismissing

Plaintiff, Leroy Brundidge's, complaint against Defendant, Calon

Insulation Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims

and crossclaims against Defendant, be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated:

WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiff110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, NY 10038212-267-3091

HARDIN, KUNDLA, MCKEON &POLETTO, P.A.Attorneys for Defendant, CalonInsulation Corporation110 William Street, 25th FloorNew York, New York 10038(212) 571-0111

Page 28: Following this cover page are ... - Judiciary of New York · supreme court of the state of new york county of new york in re: new york city asbestos litigation ... cv \ supreme court

FILED

- ?CAASKevin M. Berry, Esq.

SO ORDERED:

By: 4^ \

Erik E Harris, Esq.

Honorable Peter H. Moulton

HON.PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.

uJoU-u-asoccy~

i ^V—Oo

Page 29: Following this cover page are ... - Judiciary of New York · supreme court of the state of new york county of new york in re: new york city asbestos litigation ... cv \ supreme court

CheckApplicableBox

* >

A.

All-STATC*WTERNATIOKAJL,INC.071*1-8F 071«2 BL 071SJ-SY 071H-WK

eoo-2»-»io

IndexNo. 127150 / 02 Year

ALFONSE FORTUNATO, et al.

Plaintiffs

-against-

ABB LUMMUS CREST, INC., et. al.,

Defendants

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGEMENT MOTION AND ORDER

HARDIN, KUNDLA, MCKEON & POLETTO, P.A.Attorneys) for Defendant, Calon Insulation Corporation

Office Address & TeL No,:110 William StreetNew York, New York 10038(212) 571-0111

Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 130-1,1, the undersigned, an attorney admitted to practice in the courts of New YorkState, certifies that, upon information and belief and reasonable inquiry, the contentions contained in theannexed document are not frivolous.

February 8, 2017 Signature...Print Signer's Name Erik E. Harris

Service of a copy of the within is hereby admitted.

Dated:

Attorney(s) for

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE| 1 that the withinis a (certified) true copy of a

NOTICE OF entered in the office of the clerk of the within named Court onENTRY

[ | that an Order of which the within is a true copy will be presented for settlement to theNOTICE OF Hon. one of the judges of the withinnamed Court,

SETTLEMENT aton , at M.

Dated:

Attorneys) for

To: Office Address &Tel No.:

Attorney(s) for

Page 30: Following this cover page are ... - Judiciary of New York · supreme court of the state of new york county of new york in re: new york city asbestos litigation ... cv \ supreme court

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: Index No.190100/08

EILEEN ALBERTSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND ASADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OFJOHN P.EGAN NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER FOR WASHINGTON

Plaintiff(s)

vs GROUP INTERNATIONAL, INC.,F/K/A RAYTHEON ENGINEERS &CONSTRUCTORS, INC. ONLY

AMEC CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC. et alDefendant(s)

WHEREFORE, defendant, WASHINGTON GROUP INTERNATIONAL, INC, f/ka Raytheon

Engineers & Constructors, Inc, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant

to Civil Practice Law and rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant,

WASHINGTON GROUP INTERNATIONAL, INC,f/k/a Raytheon Engineers & Constructors, Inc. with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

WASHINGTON GROUP INTERNATIONAL, INC, f/k/a Raytheon Engineers & Constructors, Inc. be

and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs. ood

Attorneys for Defendant440 S. Warren St,Ste 400Mackenzie Hughes TowerSyracuse, NY 13202-2601

Attorneys for Plaintiffs)110 William Street 26th Floor ^ ^New York, NY 10038 ^Attorneys for Plaintiffs)

SO ORDERED,Honorable Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.

HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ#S#C#

{M0125572.2 }

Page 31: Following this cover page are ... - Judiciary of New York · supreme court of the state of new york county of new york in re: new york city asbestos litigation ... cv \ supreme court

vor j i xm .« mrm ,MOH

Page 32: Following this cover page are ... - Judiciary of New York · supreme court of the state of new york county of new york in re: new york city asbestos litigation ... cv \ supreme court

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IREOIWEDIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

m oi - zoi7

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIV

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.Dated:

%AttoEstate of Anthony Sabin and Carol S. Sabin,IndividuallyWE1TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

o

Tishman Liquidating Corp.MCGiVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED,ZHon. Peter H.MoultonHON. PETER H. MOULTON

J.S.C, 2383-22827

Page 33: Following this cover page are ... - Judiciary of New York · supreme court of the state of new york county of new york in re: new york city asbestos litigation ... cv \ supreme court

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

In Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

HCEOyE©MAR 0 2 2017

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

This Document Relates To:

DOROTHY BROCHEY, as Administratrix forthe Estate of Bert A. Brochey, and DorothyBrochey, Individually,

Index No.: 124022/1994

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

Plaintiff,

-against-

A.C. and S., INC., et al.,Defendant(s).

o% ^a , -nI? * rs » pi11 s o

WHEREFORE, defendant, VELAN VALVE CORP., hereby requests summa^judgment inrn .

the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant, VELAN VALVE CORP., with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant VELAN VALVE CORP., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated:New York, New York

SagarOfeadha; ^Weitz & Luxenberg, PC

Attorneys for plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

TimotWCoughlan, Esq.Maxon Marvel Bradley Anderson &Tardy LLCAttorneys for DefendantVELAN VALVE CORP.328 Newman Springs RoadRed Bank, NJ 07701(732) 704-5291

SO ORDERED, ~

Judge Peter H. MoultonHON. PETER H. MOULTON

J.S.C

Page 34: Following this cover page are ... - Judiciary of New York · supreme court of the state of new york county of new york in re: new york city asbestos litigation ... cv \ supreme court

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates To:

VICTOR A. TODD

NYCAL

(RECIUViDMAR 02 2017

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Index No.: 109984/08

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Eaton Corporation, as successor-in-interest to Cutler-Hammer,

Inc., (improperly sued as Eaton Corporation, individually and now known as Eaton Electrical, Inc.,

and as successor to The Vickers Pump Company and Cutler-Hammer, Inc.) (“ Eaton” ), hereby

requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff’s complaint against Eaton with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against

defendant Eaton be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Robert M. Gilmartin Jr., Esq.Attorneys for Defendant Eaton Corporation, assuccessor-in-interest to Cutlap*Hammer, Inc.,McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvane)§fc Carpenter, LLP225 Liberty Street, 36th FlooS "T|New York, New York 102S^o so

*£ i 1oS °* m

-nI

Dated: ew Y/ovk, New York

F q-LLP

Jordan C/Belluck i

Attorneys for Plaintiff546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, New York 10036

SO ORDERED:

/ Hon. Peter H. Moulton

HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.

32005651

Page 35: Following this cover page are ... - Judiciary of New York · supreme court of the state of new york county of new york in re: new york city asbestos litigation ... cv \ supreme court

. SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK' COUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCAL

1ECEWE0MAR 02 2017

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

This Document Relates To: Index No.: 110682/06

DIANE DEFRANCISI, as Executrix of the Estate OPPOSITION SUMMARYof LEONARD DEFRANCISI, and DIANE . JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERDEFRANCISI, Individually

WHEREFORE, defendant Eaton Corporation, as successor-in-interest to Cutler-Hammer,

Inc., (improperly pled as Eaton Corporation, individually and now known as Eaton Electrical, Inc.,

and As Successor to The Vickers Pump Company and Cutler-Hammer, Inc.) (“ Eaton” ), hereby

requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against Eaton with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto.ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against

defendant E#on pe and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated:

FoLLP

York,/New York

15 Zo/7

Jordan <Belluck !Attorneys for Plaintiff546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, New York 10036

SO ORDERED:

j^on. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.

HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.

y.Robert M. Gilmartin, Jr, Esq.Attorneys for Defendant Eaton Corporation, assuccessor-in-interest to Cutler-Hammer, Inc.,McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney &Sarpenter,225 Liberty Street, 36th Floor S ^New York, New York 10281 ^ JL

-r\

%

3200390_1

Q3"1l

3

Page 36: Following this cover page are ... - Judiciary of New York · supreme court of the state of new york county of new york in re: new york city asbestos litigation ... cv \ supreme court

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)

Index No.: 109938/08

JOSEPH SAEVA and NORMA SAEVA NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

IREOEIWEDMAR 02 2017

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

WHEREFORE, defendant Eaton Corporation, as successor in interest to Cutler-Hammer,

Inc., (improperly pled as Eaton Corporation, individually and now known as Eaton Electrical, Inc.

and As Successor to the Vickers Pump Company and Cutler-Hammer, Inc.) (“ Eaton” ), hereby

requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against Eaton with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto.oo.w

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross^laims agai^s|defendant Eaton be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and withod£eosts?5 rDated: bfew Yqrk, New York

L/ 1 S

& mo:H s-n-n

o

Jordan C. Fox, I}sBelluck & Fox, ]546 Fifth Avei^ue/^ FloorNew York, New York 10036

Robert M. Gilmartin, Jr., Esq.Attorneys for Eaton Corporation, as successor ininterest to Cutler-Hammer, Inc.,McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP225 Liberty Street, 36th FloorNew York, New York 10281

SO ORDERED, -lofT Peter H. Moulton

3200549J HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.

Page 37: Following this cover page are ... - Judiciary of New York · supreme court of the state of new york county of new york in re: new york city asbestos litigation ... cv \ supreme court

r?

• ^ V . ** V/ i vS

4 - .-;K ** Wv .-

' \-\ \ <>>^

^OI .JUOM H B3T3H W' x<0 AX.

Page 38: Following this cover page are ... - Judiciary of New York · supreme court of the state of new york county of new york in re: new york city asbestos litigation ... cv \ supreme court

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK MAR 0 2 2017

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCAL PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

This Document Relates To: Index No.: 111767/08

ARMAND DEL CIOPPO NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Eaton Corporation, as successor-in-interest to Cutler-Hammer,

Inc. (improperly sued as Eaton Corporation, individually and now known as Eaton Electrical, Inc.,

and as successor to The Vickers Pump Company and Cutler-Hammer, Inc.) (“ Eaton” ), hereby

requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against Eaton with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against

defendant Eaton be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated:

Jordan CBelluckAttorneys for Plaintiff295 Madison Avenue, 37^ FloorNew York, New York 10017

Attorneys for Defendant Eaton Corporation, assuccessor-in-interest to Cutler-Hammer, Inc.,McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP225 Liberty Street, 36th FloorNew York, New York 10281

HON. PETER H. MOULTON

SO ORDERED:

/Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.

J.S.C.3200579_1

Page 39: Following this cover page are ... - Judiciary of New York · supreme court of the state of new york county of new york in re: new york city asbestos litigation ... cv \ supreme court

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

NYCALIN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

WADE M. LEWIS

(RBOilVEDMAR 01 MW

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)Index No.: 190138/16,(114654/02, '

106694/02

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc,, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs5 complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.Dated: New Yprkr>New York

, 2017

C . >Susan C. Barlow, Esq,

Attorney for PlaintiffsWade M, LewisWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

K^annJrf. Cook, Esq. ~Attorney for Defendant mCourter & Company, Inc.MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

oocr

si * 2?Z rn , r— -Sg d- JTSPS » rn§ 5 O-n

so ORDERE:Hon. Peter H, Moulton

HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C. 1122-9176

Page 40: Following this cover page are ... - Judiciary of New York · supreme court of the state of new york county of new york in re: new york city asbestos litigation ... cv \ supreme court

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

MAR 01 2017

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

This Document Relates to:Index No.:, 190138/16.114654/02,o.: 190138/16.11

(^106694/&K >WADE M. LEWIS

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs* complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to ail co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Susan C. Barlow, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsWade M. LewisWEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C,

700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

hkoYTi i ^ ^MgrpyftnnJM. Cook, Esq*

Attorney for DefendantTishman Liquidating Corp.MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

2383-25598AD