FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

download FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf  /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

of 76

Transcript of FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    1/76

    FLUENCY DISORDERS

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN,

    MASLP

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    2/76

    Definition :

    Fluency & Disfluency

    Factors affecting fluency

    Dimensions of fluent speech

    Theoretical constructs in fluencydevelopment

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    3/76

    FLUENCY

    DEFINITION:

    Fluency refers to the effortless production of longcontinuous utterance at a rapid rate, be it the first orsecond language.

    - Stark Weather (1980)

    Stark Weather (1987) considered fluency as amultidimensional behavior and the dimension of fluencyare:

    - continuity or smoothness of speech

    - rate of speech

    -effort a speaker makes in producing speech (StarkWeather 1981)

    -rhythmic structures (Stark Weather 1981)

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    4/76

    According to Perkins (1977),

    FLUENCY is a barometer for the entire

    speech system, with its limits apparently set by

    adequacy or performance of the other

    dimensions of speech.

    According to Kunnampallil Gejo (2009),

    Fluency refers to the uninterrupted productionof long continuous smooth utterance at a minimum

    rate of the language which is legible for the speaker

    and listener.

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    5/76

    DYSFLUENCY:

    The term dys denotes pathology or abnormal .

    Dysfluency abnormal instances of fluency

    failure, ie ; those most closely associated with

    stuttering. Dysfluencies have been broadly defined as

    including all instances of broken words

    ( ie; part-word, syllable, or sound repetitions or

    prolongations)

    and/or fluency disruptions associated with

    excess tension or struggle.

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    6/76

    In contrast, Disfluency has been proposed as

    the appropriate term for normal non-disfluencies.

    Disfluencies or normal non-fluencies areconsidered to include

    - silent

    - non tense pauses

    - interjections

    - revisions

    - word or phrase repetitions without

    indications of stress or struggle.

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    7/76

    Normal disfluencies have been cataloged byseveral authors, and there is general agreementamong them as to what constitutes disfluency.

    Eight commonly used categories of disfluencyare:

    * part-word repetition

    * single-syllable word repetition* multisyllabic word repetition

    * phrase repetition

    * interjection

    * revision- incomplete phrase

    * prolongation

    * tense pause

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    8/76

    Some of the major distinguishing features

    that differentiate normal disfluency fromstuttering are

    # the amount of disfluency

    # the number of units of repetitions &interjections

    # type of disfluency, especially in

    relation to the age of the child.

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    9/76

    Johnson (1961) classified the followingtypes of speech behavior as disfluencies:

    1. Interjection2. Part-word repetition

    3. Word repetition

    4. Phrase repetition5. Revisions

    6. Incomplete phrases

    7. Broken words8. Prolonged sounds

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    10/76

    1. Interjection of sounds, syllables, words or phrases:

    This implies extraneous sounds uh, erhmm;

    - extraneous words such as well which are distinct,from sounds and words associated with the fluent textor with phonemes included one or more units orrepetition of the interjected material;

    For eg: uh-uh-uh are each counted as one instance ofinterjection .

    The number of times the interjection is repeated withineach instance is also noted, uh-uh is an example ofan interjection; repeated once and uh-uh-uh is an

    example of an interjection repeated twice.

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    11/76

    2. Part- word repetition:

    This category has repetitions of parts of words-

    that is syllables and sounds. Within each instance of repetition the number of

    times the sound or syllable is repeated is

    counted; box-buy involves one unit of repetition

    and guh-guh involves two units.

    This does not distinguish between sound and

    syllable repetitions.

    eg: ruh-ruh-ruh cuhcome, ba-ba-baby & a-bou -bout

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    12/76

    3. Word repetition:

    This category includes repetitions of

    whole words including words of one syllable. Both the number of instances and number of

    repetition units within each instance are

    counted. I-I-I, was- was & going are samples

    of instances of word repetition; the first involves

    two units of repetition and each of other two

    involves two unit.

    A word repeated for emphasis as in very, veryclear is not counted as a disfluency.

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    13/76

    4. Phrase repetitions:

    This category includes repetitions of two or more

    words.eg: I was I was going

    5.Revisions : Instances of revision include those in which the

    context of a phrase is modified, or in which there

    is a grammatical modification. Change in

    pronounciation of a word is also counted as arevision.

    eg: I was- I am going

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    14/76

    6. Incomplete phrases :

    - one which in the thought or context is notcompleted and

    - which is not an instance of phrase repetition.eg: she was- and after she got there he come.

    7. Broken words :

    - Words which are not completelypronounced and which are not associated with anyother category, or

    - in which the normal rhythm of the word isbroken in a way that definitely interferes with thesmooth flow of speech are characterized by thiscategory.

    eg: I was g-(pause)- going home.

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    15/76

    8. Prolonged sounds :

    This category includes sounds

    judged to be unduly prolonged. If a sound is prolonged twice, it is

    counted both as a prolonged sound

    and a part- word repetition.

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    16/76

    FACTORS AFFECTING FLUENCY

    Several factors

    - continuity

    - rate

    - effort

    - rhythm- physiological framework of fluency

    - motor and linguistic factors

    - language complexity

    - grammatical categories- sexs

    - situation and

    - environmental factors seems to affect fluency.

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    17/76

    1. CONTINUITY:

    Pauses whether filled or unfilled are acommon feature of speech. We pause on the

    average every 4.8 words and our perception ofspeech seems to be more continuous than thereality of it. Presumably, this happens becausewe focus on the content of communication we

    listen to the ideas and not contribute to theseideas is filtered out by our perceptualmechanism. This is not to say that pausesnear convey information, but the information

    sometimes they convey has to do with theprocess of communication or with the speakerslevel of uncertainty rarely with the content(Stark Weather 1987).

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    18/76

    There has been a presumption from the earliest

    days of research in this area, that the pauses

    were occasions on which language was being

    formulated and although it seems likely that this

    is true for some pauses it may not be true for all

    pauses.

    In support of the idea that the two types ofpauses are different in kind, Clark notes that

    idiosyncratic pauses convey no information, and

    tend to be overlooked and concludes that

    conventional pauses are information bearingelements of sentences.

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    19/76

    2. RATE OF SPEECH:

    This is the rate in which continuous syllablescan be produced as a function of speed of

    articulatory movement and the degree of co-articulatory overlap.

    ( Gay,1978; Stark Weather, 1981).

    Females produce utterance that are more

    variable in rate and longer utterances and theyare more fluent than males ( Malecot, Johnsonand Kizzias, 1972).

    Rate depends on the type of syllables produced,

    CCV and CVC syllables are produced at a fasterrate than VCC syllables.

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    20/76

    3. EFFORT:

    Speech being produced effortlessly, is a

    characteristic of fluent speech ( Stark

    Weather,1987).

    The two types of efforts are :

    - mental effort or concentration where the

    thoughts are focused on the content rather thanon the processes of utterances and

    - muscular effort, where the effort

    provides a flow of air, opens and closes theglottis and moves the tongue, lips, jaw, velum

    and pharynx(Stark Weather,1987).

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    21/76

    Among the speech sounds, stops &

    fricatives require more effort than nasalsand glides.

    (Malecot,1955; Worth & Sakuda,1966).

    Effort is consequently related torate, stress & duration of speech sounds.

    Effort of mind & effort of muscle are both

    aspects of fluency. It is difficult to measurethe former.

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    22/76

    4. RHYTHM:

    Rather than being a dimension of fluency,

    rhythm seems to promote or enhancefluency.

    Speech rhythm serves fluency by makingit easier for us to talk faster.

    It does this in several ways- unstressedsyllables are shorter and thus require lesstime.

    Martin(1972) says that rhythmic patterningcarries a heavy information load inordinary connected speech

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    23/76

    5. PHYSIOLOGICAL FACTORS:

    Dejoy & Gregory (1985) indicated that during the laterpreschool years, children become more accomplished in

    the symbolic/ motoric selection. They added that the forward flow of speech becomesrelatively more automatic

    The reduction in frequency may well reflect increasedtemporal precision and control and simplification of the

    control process (Sharkey & Polkins, 1985). Van riper (1971) indicated that disruption of proper

    programming of the physiological movements necessaryfor fluent speech causes stuttering.

    Spatial & timing co-ordination are essential physiologicalaspects of fluency (Stark Weather,1987).

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    24/76

    6. MOTOR FACTORS:

    Muscles that contract during a speech willreceive a high frequency neural impulses at the

    proper movement. Muscles which are relaxed will receive a low

    frequency neural impulse.

    The capacity to relax antagonist muscles hasmore to do with frequency than the capacity tocontract agonist muscles, which is proved instutters (Freeman & Ushijima,1978).

    Along with the mass and stiffness of theperipheral mechanism, certain neuralmechanisms also have an important influenceon the timing of movements.

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    25/76

    7. LANGUAGE MATURITY:

    It is one of the important factor which is

    related to fluency. Increased ability in phonology, semantics,

    syntax & pragmatic knowledge influence

    fluency. As these abilities grow, sentences become

    longer and more complex.

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    26/76

    8. LANGUAGE COMPLEXITY:

    Analysis of language samples of Haynes &

    Hood (1978) who studied 20 males & 20female children between 5 to 6yrs

    supported that language influences

    dysfluency especially in the complexmodeling condition.

    Significant increase in word repetition,

    revision, incomplete phrase and

    dysrhythmic phonations occurred in the

    complex modeling situation.

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    27/76

    9. GRAMMATICAL CATEGORY:

    It is found that the frequency of occurrence ofboth unfilled & filled pauses is more before

    *content words than functionwords (Fagen,1982).

    The words following filled pauses are difficult topredict and filled pauses occur mainly before

    words which are highly uncertain. Filled pauses are much more common at the*beginning of clauses than within clause(Hawkings,1971) and

    - they tend to occur *before longer andmore complex sentences (Smith & Lallijee,1974).

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    28/76

    10. SEX:

    Some studies have indicated that males

    show greater disfluencies than females inthe age groups 2-6yrs (Haynes &

    Hood,1977; Yairi,1981; Wexler &

    Mysak,1982).

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    29/76

    11. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS:

    The person to whom the child is speaking

    is also an important factor whichinfluences fluency.

    It has been found that the child speaks

    more fluently with a puppet than with anexperimenter.

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    30/76

    DIMENSIONS OF FLUENCY

    There are several dimensions of fluency.

    Stark weather (1987) defines speech fluency in terms ofcont inui ty, durat ion, co-art iculation & effor t.

    1) Continuity :

    - refers to the degree to which syllables & wordsare logically sequenced as well as the presence or

    absence of pauses. If the semantic units follow one another in a continual

    flow of information, the speech is interpreted as fluent.

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    31/76

    If however, the units of speech fail to flow

    in a logical sequence, information does notflow.

    Despite a continual flow of sound & the

    absence of pauses, the speech is notthought of as fluent.

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    32/76

    Another aspect of continuitypauses

    The pauses in the sequence of speech can be

    viewed from several perspectives. Clark (1971) differentiates pauses as

    conventional & idiosyncratic.

    Conventional pauses are used by speakers to

    signal a linguistically important event.

    Idiosyncratic pauses reflect hesitation or

    uncertainty on the part of the speaker. These

    pauses indicate a decision- making processconcerning upcoming word, choice, style or

    syntax.

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    33/76

    Pauses also have been considered as

    unfilled or filled.

    Unfi l led pausesare characterized by asilence lasting longer than ~250millisec

    (Goldman-Eisler,1958).

    This duration is suggested as a convenientthreshold for normal silent intervals during

    fluent speech, since normal word junctures

    rarely exceed this duration ( eg: thejuncture necessary to distinguish night rate

    from nitrate).

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    34/76

    Filled pausesare characterized by

    essentially meaningless sounds such asah, or, uh & um.

    Whether the speech is considered fluent

    depends on many other features includingthe frequency of these pauses along with

    the occurrence of other aspects of fluency.

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    35/76

    Rate of speech also signals the perception of fluency.

    If a speaker is producing a lengthy utterance, the rate ofspeech is likely to be more rapid (Malecot, Johnston &Kizziar, 1972).

    Speaker is producing speech at a slow rate, everythingelse being equal, the speaker is not likely to beevaluated as being non-fluent.

    Conversely, speaker is producing speech at a very rapid

    rate, he or she is not likely to be evaluated as beingproduced.

    Although the rate of production is one aspect of fluency,it does not appear to be a primary dimension.

    The flow of speech & information is based not only onrate, but on a combination of many factors, particularlythe ease of production.

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    36/76

    2) Duration of speech segments relates

    closely to the co-articulation of the

    segments. The duration of the consonants & vowels

    of a language varies considerably with

    speech rate, phonetic & linguistic context.For eg: stressed syllables are longer than

    unstressed ones (Umeda, 1975).

    Sound segments are longer at theinitiation & termination of syllables, words

    & phrases (Fowler,1978).

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    37/76

    Segment durations are dramatically influenced

    by

    - position in the syllable (initial consonants

    are longer than syllable-final consonants),

    - length of the word (segments are shorter

    with longer words) &- sentence length (segments are shorter

    during longer sentences) [Huggins, 1978]

    Co- articulatory effects are greater when thespeech rate is increased ( Gay,1978).

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    38/76

    Co-articulatory effects contribute to the

    timing & smoothness of speech.

    In fluent speech, articulatory movementsbetween the sounds, syllables & words are

    done with ease.

    The transitions are smooth & there is acontinuous flow of overlapping sounds.

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    39/76

    The final dimension of fluencyEffort.

    Starkweather (1987) distinguishes two types of

    effort:- effort associated with linguistic planning

    - effort associated with muscle movement.

    Clinically, it may be that the listeners perceptionof effort, in combination with the other

    dimensions of fluent speech production, is the

    common indicator of fluent speech.

    As Starkweather suggests, Fluent speech iseffortless in two distinct ways : It requires little

    thought & it requires little muscular exertion.

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    40/76

    Fluent speech is characterized by little

    attention being paid to the process of

    production; speaking is automatic. The thought process in fluent speech

    takes relatively little time, while the

    execution of speech takes somewhatlonger.

    Fluent speech is characterized by little

    sensation of opposition or constriction ofairflow.

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    41/76

    On the other hand, people who stutter are at the

    opposite end of the continuum of effort.

    Greater effort is associated with all the following:

    - greater contact between articulators

    - greater impedance between the flow of air &

    the structures of the vocal tract, beginning withthe vocal folds

    - greater subglottic air pressure

    With the speaker producing speech in thisfashion, it is likely that speech will be judged as

    non-fluent.

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    42/76

    DEVELOPMENT OF FLUENCY

    Initially, the speech of children lacks

    fluency. When demand from the society

    increases to produce fluent speech,

    fluency increases. It increases withincrease in age. If the child is capable of

    meeting the demands of the society , the

    speech is fluent. If the child is incapable ofmeeting societal demands, dysfluent

    speech is produced.

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    43/76

    1) Development of Speech Continuity:

    Continuity is a factor affecting fluency.

    Kowal & Sabin(1975) studied 168 normalchildren from KG to 12th grade.

    The most common dysfluencies are,

    * pauses

    * repetitions

    * false starts

    * parenthetical remarks

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    44/76

    Frequency of dysfluencies did not change

    from KG to 12th

    grade children. So it wasunderstood that frequency could not be

    taken as a tool for assessing fluency.

    It was noticed that false starts, repetitions& pauses decreased steadily from KG to

    12th grade.

    There was a sudden increase in false

    starts at 4th grade.

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    45/76

    - It was speculated that, at this age as

    children were formally trained in terms of

    grammatical knowledge, they might be over

    conscious of their speech and would try to

    apply their grammatical knowledge. Hence, a

    number of false starts would occur.

    Parenthetical remarks increased steadily fromKG to 12th standard. This was believed to give

    continuity to their speech.

    There was no developmental trend seen in

    terms of dysfluencies.

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    46/76

    Dejoy & Gregory (1975) studied children

    between 3 - 5yrs of age. They reported thatrepetitions of words, phrase, part word,

    incomplete phrases & dysrhythmic phonation

    were more commonly seen in 3yr old than

    5yr old.

    Yairi (1981) studied 33 normal children of

    24-33mths . He found that part word & small

    word repetition are most commonly seen inyoung children.

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    47/76

    Revisions & incomplete phonations did not

    show any developmental trend 2-4yrs.

    Repetitions, tense phrase, dysrhythmic

    phonation decline steadily from 2-4yrs.

    Interjections & repetitions of words &

    phrases decline steadily with increase in

    age.

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    48/76

    2) Development of Rate:

    Rapid rate is an aspect for fluency .

    Many researchers have studied rate by thefollowing ways,

    # measuring duration of pauses

    # measuring syllables per second# measuring duration of segment

    (length of utterances)

    From the studies, it has been reportedthat, there is a clear cut trend indevelopment.

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    49/76

    Duration of pauses:

    Kowal & Sabin (1975) reported that

    development of rate shows there is adramatic development of fluency.

    There is a rapid change in terms of

    duration of pauses from KG 2nd gradechildren. They also observed that males

    have longer unfilled pauses as compared

    to females & duration of pauses decreasewith increase in age.

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

    S ll bl d

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    50/76

    Syllables per second :

    Kowal & Sabin (1975) reported that there is a shortincrement in terms of syllables per second from KG 2nd

    grade children. It is leveled at 4th grade.

    A step increase is seen between 4th & 8th grades.

    From 8th grade onwards, not much increase is seen.

    Therefore, rate of speech in terms of syllables/sec showsa steady increase in school age children.

    Black & Walker (1950) reported an adult speaker is ableto speak at an average of 5-6 syllables/sec.

    Armster (1984) reported that, rate of speech show a

    clear cut developmental trend in pre-school children.

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

    D ti f S t/Utt

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    51/76

    Duration of Segment/Utterance :

    Speaking slowly & precisely is one of the

    characters of children speech. The speech of an adult is faster & has

    many overlapping co-articulatorymovements.

    Studies have shown that, duration ofsegment increase with increase in age.

    With increase in age, there is a decrease

    in duration of individual sounds, so fluencyof speech increases.

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    52/76

    Duration of /s/ in word initial position is

    brief in 7yr old as compared to 5yr oldchildren.

    Duration of sound is shorter in longer

    utterances/words, unstressed words &sounds in initial position.

    Smith (1984) reported that 2-4yrs is the

    critical period for duration ofsegment/utterances.

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    53/76

    3) Development of Ease of Speech:

    Effortless speech is an influential factor in

    maintaining fluency. The effort may be mental or physical:

    - the amount of time an individual takes

    in planning an utterance reflects in theamount of mental effort required in fluentspeech.

    - the amount of time taken in executing

    an utterance reflects on the amount ofphysical/muscular effort required for fluentspeech production.

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

    I hild t i l i di ti th t

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    54/76

    In younger children, rate is slower indicating thatthe amount of time spent in executing anutterance is more .therefore, physical effort is

    more. In adults, rate of speech is faster because time

    spent in executing an utterance is less & so,physical effort is less.

    Presence of pauses & repetitions indicates theamount of time spent in planning & therefore,mental effort taken with increase in age, there isa decrease in mental & physical effort.

    Co-ordination: articulators & the 3 systems areimportant for production of fluent speech.

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

    R h h h th t DDK t

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    55/76

    Researchers have shown that, DDK rate

    increases in age & continues till 18-20yrs.

    Fast rate of repetition shows steady increase

    from 6-19yrs.

    Variability seen in terms of speech production

    usually decreases with increase in age.

    Researchers have shown that, good speechmotor control capacity like adults is acquired

    from 8-12yrs.

    They also found that as the nervous systemdevelops till adolescent speech motor

    development also takes place till that time.

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

    T i hild h b

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    56/76

    To summarise childrens speech becomesincreasingly fluent as they mature.

    As the fluency increases children also learn to

    deal with lapses of fluency, such asdiscontinuous in more sophisticated. Thegrowing capacity to talk more is due toincreasing demands for fluent speech, the

    demands placed on children by the people theycommunicate with and by themselves.

    Most children show increased co-articulatoryundershoot, utterances and useless effort in

    talking. Hence, all elements of fluency seems to grow.

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    57/76

    Growth of fluent speech comes from several areas.

    There is increasing control over the movements of thevocal tact.

    This control develops in several ways.

    First, there is growth in the childs ability to react rapidlyto stimuli.

    Second, there is an increase in the childs ability toco-ordinate the simultaneous movements of differentparts of the vocal tract.

    Third, the ability to plan and then execute a sequence ofmovements.

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    58/76

    Another capacity comes from rhythm.

    The sense of rhythm develops and makes it

    easier for a child to anticipate the movement of

    speech production. one of the growing demands

    is the child's development of language skills.

    Increased syntactic, semantic, phonologic &pragmatic knowledge contributes to this demand

    for fluency.

    As the childrens syntax develops, their

    sentences become longer & structurally morecomplex.

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

    Because the length of utterance is correlated with the

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    59/76

    Because, the length of utterance is correlated with therate of speech, the children must deal with a demand toincrease the speed with which the vocal tract partsmove.

    As the childs knowledge of the rules of phonologyincreases they become interested in using longer words& phrases and more difficult combination of sounds toexpress intentions.

    Childs pragmatic knowledge also grows and this also

    places a demand on the fluency of speech. The speech of young children is characterized by a

    spout of anxiety at 2 or 3yrs of age, their speech is averbalization of their current thought or activity.

    With increased maturity speech becomes more

    controlled and directed to more specific purposes.Growth in pragmatics seems to diminish the spoutanxiety of childrens speech.

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

    It is not only the rules of language but also the people

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    60/76

    It is not only the rules of language but also the peoplewhom the child communicates place demands on them.

    These people include parents, sibling etc.

    Children have a tendency to use speech & language thatis similar to that used by those they are talking to- whenparents talk to their children using sophisticatedlanguage, syntactically complex and with an advancedvocabulary, the children try to use the same form.

    Some children do not develop the capacity for fluentspeech as rapidly as others, and at times the demand forfluency made by their environments are too much forthem to handle.

    When this is the case, fluent speech breaks down..

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

    These frequent episodes as likely to cause the

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    61/76

    These frequent episodes as likely to cause thechildren to try harder- to get words out fasterparticularly words that have been produced

    discontinuously to struggle with them, forcingand pushing with increased air pressure and totense the speech musculature so that is stiff,slow moving, un co-ordinated and tremulous.

    This is likely to slow the rate at which such

    children produce information. During the period of development of speech

    behavior, to child learns how to talk semiautomatically.

    When the patterns of struggle tension andemotional reaction have become habitual andsemi-automatic stuttering has developed

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

    INDIAN STUDIES RELATED TO

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    62/76

    INDIAN STUDIES RELATED TODEVELOPMENT OF FLUENCY:

    Naga Poornima (1990) studied Kannada

    speaking normal children between the agerange of 3-4yrs.

    Story telling & picture description were used.

    Dysfluencies noticed were pauses, repetitions,false starts & parenthetical remarks.

    Unfilled pauses, false starts were observedmaximally during picture description. Number ofunfilled pauses decreased between 3-3.8yrs, butsudden increase was seen from 3.8-3.10yrsafter which there was a decline between 3.10-4yrs. No developmental trends were observed.

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    63/76

    Repetitions increased from 3-3.4yrs but

    decreased from 3.6-4yrs.

    False starts were seen more in the picturedescription tests in the word initial position.

    Parenthetical remarks were seen more in

    story-telling tasks. Frequency increasedfrom 3-3.4yrs, decreased from 3.4-3.8yrs

    and again increased from 3.8-4yrs.

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    64/76

    Indu (1990) :

    Studied Kannada speaking children

    between 4-5yrs of age.

    Connected speech was used.

    Pauses, repetitions & parenthetical

    remarks were most commonly seen in

    content words than in function words.

    They were seen more in the initial position

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

    Yamini (1990) :

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    65/76

    Yamini (1990) :

    Studied Kannada speaking normal children of 5-6yrs.

    She used 6 sets of picture cartoons Common dysfluencies observed are :

    # filled & unfilled pauses

    # audible inspirations

    # parenthetical remarks# false starts

    # repetitions

    These dysfluencies occurred more before nounsthan other grammatical categories and isobserved more in initial position.

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    66/76

    Rajendraswamy (1991):

    Studied Kannada speaking normal children

    between the age range 6-7yrs. 6 sets of panchatantra stories were used.

    He found that increase in % age of dysfluency

    was present from 6-6.6yrs.

    Common dysfluencies observed were :

    * filled pauses

    * false starts

    * repetitions

    * parenthetical remarks

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

    Less common dysfluencies were :

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    67/76

    Less common dysfluencies were :

    * audible inspirations

    * broken words* unfilled pauses

    More dysfluencies seen on/ before nouns,

    verbs, conjunctions & interjections.

    Less commonly seen on/before

    prepositions & adverbs.

    Dysfluencies were reported to be mainly ininitial position.

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

    Sharma (1991)

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    68/76

    Sharma (1991) :

    Studied dysfluencies in Hindi speaking normal children

    between 6-7yrs.

    Percentage of dysfluencies decreased from 6-6.4yrs.

    Maximally occurring dysfluency was unfilled

    Filled pauses were seen maximally between 6.6-6.8yrs.

    Parenthetical remarks were seen between 6.6-6.8yrs Prolongations were less commonly seen.

    No definite pattern was seen in the occurrence of

    dysfluencies.

    Dysfluencies were present mainly in the initial position.

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

    DEVELOPMENT OF

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    69/76

    DEVELOPMENT OF

    DYSFLUENCY

    Froeschels (1921) depicted the

    development of stuttering as a process in

    which simple repetitions by progressive

    stages became more rapid, irregular,forced, and finally inhibited under the

    pressure of some penalty.

    Bluemel (1932) termed the incipient stageof the disorder primary stuttering.

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    70/76

    He noted that it often consisted of the repetition

    of the first word or syllable of the sentence and

    that it frequently had a tendency to disappear

    and return repeatedly over a period of months or

    years.

    He described secondary stuttering ascharacterized by the childs consciousness of

    the impediment, physical effort, the use of

    starters, synonyms and other attempts to control

    or conceal stuttering, anticipation, above all fear of letters, words, people & speech situations.

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    71/76

    Van Ripers Four Tracks :

    Van Riper (1982) offered a descriptive

    scheme which placed particular stress on

    the variability of stuttering

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

    T k 1

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    72/76

    Track 1

    - Van Riper found the symptoms to consist

    initially of effortless, unhurried repetitions ofsyllables & words, marked by extreme

    fluctuations & long remissions.

    - Onset was gradual.

    - As the disorder progressed the repetitions

    became more rapid & irregular, & there

    appeared in sequence prolongations, tension &

    forcing with intermittent evidence of concern onthe part of the child, associated movements,

    word & situation fears & avoidance.

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    73/76

    Track 2

    Children who were late in beginning to talk,

    the stuttering was said to take the form of rapid,irregular syllable & word repetition from thebeginning.

    Later, silent intervals, revisions, &

    interjections appeared, & the pattern took onmany aspects of cluttering.

    Thereafter the pattern changed relativelylittle.

    Word & sound fears were generally mild &tended to develop late.

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

    Track 3

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    74/76

    Track 3

    Sudden inability to speak, or complete

    blockage.

    Very soon this was followed by severe

    forcing & struggle, breathing abnormalities,

    signs of frustration, associated facial & other

    tensions, fear & avoidance.In most cases the severe struggle reactions

    abated after a while & followed first by

    prolongation & then by syllable repetition.

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    75/76

    Track 4

    Children who were reported to have

    begun to stutter rather suddenly with

    repetition of phrases, words, & later

    syllables.

    They tended to stutter openly withfew avoidances & showed little changes in

    their stuttering over the years.

    KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO JOHN

  • 7/27/2019 FLUENCY DISORDERS.pdf /KUNNAMPALLIL GEJO

    76/76