Floaters Summer 2013

download Floaters Summer 2013

of 3

Transcript of Floaters Summer 2013

  • 7/28/2019 Floaters Summer 2013

    1/3

    Hell in a HandCaRTDib dib dib, dob dob dobI have a sad tale to tell, my little floaters, so I

    shall endeavor to tell it shortly, and to spare

    you the gruesome tedious details.

    Earlier this spring the brave First Cub Scouts Troop of

    Cowley Bridge were paddling their dinghy down the

    Uxbridge section of the Grand Union Canal. Their

    woggles were tight around their khaki neckerchiefs,

    their badges proud upon their sleeves.

    But wait! What is this ploughing down the cut behind

    them, threatening to mow them down in its wake? It

    has great wooden wheels and unmanned handles. The

    handcart careered, sending spokes of water arcing in

    the sun. The scouts panicked. Oars were abandoned. An

    eyewitness decried an attitude of every man for himself

    and the devil take the hindmost.

    Panicked paddling by adolescent arms managed to

    swing the dinghy around and it turned, fatal error, to

    face toward from whence it had come. The handcart and

    the dinghy collided horribly, the besuited passengers of

    the unwieldy craft tumbled into the green water. The

    brave scouts fished them out.

    As a consequence of this sad encounter it is proposed

    that it will no longer be permissible for one to turn ones

    boat around on this entire stretch of the Grand Union.

    The Floater only hopes that no such tragic incident

    befalls another innocent stretch of the waterways.

    Not A Bad Turn-out

    The first-ever National Association of Bargee

    Travellers floating general meeting was held

    recently in a well-attended upper room of the

    Malt Shovel in Cowley Bridge.

    Nigel Moore spoke at length, and at times,

    philosophically, upon the outcome of his legal battles

    with British Waterways and the Canal and River Trust,

    and dwelt briefly upon some of the niceties of the

    English Constitution.

    The Floater was proud to be present, and pondered atlength upon much of what was said, pacing in the

    passing sunshine over the bridge above the pub and

    lock. Those floaters familiar with Section 17 (3) (c) (ii)

    should also know of these Byelaws which establish the

    entirety of CaRTs ability to control mooring on the

    Waterways: They can insist that you moor up properly, tied fore

    and aft;

    They can stop you mooring to any of the Boards works

    not intended for mooring;

    They can move you without notice if causing anobstruction to navigation or towpath;

    They can move you on notice if they need to carry out

    works to the bank;

    They can remove you altogether, on notice, if your boat

    is on the waterways without authority;

    They can require you to either: have a home mooring,

    or: to moor within the parameters of s.17 (3) (c) (ii) of

    the 1995 Act.

    Any Guidance, or terms and conditions, or charges,permits or fines that exceed these principles were thus

    found to be unlawful, to be ultra vires.

    Dib dib dontIn breaking news, it seems that the First Cub Scouts

    Troop of Cowley Bridge has been disbanded. There hasbeen some dark muttering about trolls. Nothing more is

    known to date.

    The Editor would like it to be known that, in most terms and conditions, it is advisable to follow reasonable guidance.

  • 7/28/2019 Floaters Summer 2013

    2/3

    Breaking (up) NewsYou have nothing to lose butyour mooring pinsIn more recently breaking hearsay the Floater has

    become aware of a change in the tide, of waters

    lapping back at marks we thought were, mayhap,

    but once-in-a-lifetime highs.

    It seems that fines are to be charged, and perhaps

    fees paid, by overstaying boats on the River Lee.

    This leap from goldfish-bowl to bonfire will

    doubtless come as some surprise to regular Lee

    Boaters, who have become accustomed to a

    grandfatherly oversight of their occasional lapses.

    These, the Floater learns, are expected to be the

    next beneficiaries of a Roving Mooring Permit

    scheme.

    A three-stage approach by CaRT, apparently

    contrived first to monetize, then to marginalize and

    finally to exterminate the community of liveaboard

    boaters has been formerly noted in these pages,

    but let the Floater repeat himself, if only for the

    edification of the occasional reader:

    Firstly we persecute them economically, until their

    very lives become precarious.

    Second we offer them a marginally less offensive

    form of persecution, for a fee.

    Thirdly we exterminate those who fail to agree to

    option two.

    The remainder will, inevitably, eventually tire of an

    even milder persecution, go broke, or die.

    What Could The Canals Be Like?In his ignorance the Floater finds himself wondering whether

    there really ever was a Golden Age of the Waterways, when

    boaters went unflustered by bureaucracy, when it was possible to

    moor, and to cruise and to moor wherever and forever as you

    wished or needed.

    He has heard tell of times past, when the rivers and canals were

    all-but empty, and boaters communities sprang up

    spontaneously and thrived or revived as boats came and went.

    Times when, even, licences and their plates, not to mention their

    terms and conditions, or the Guidance, were unheard of and yet

    to be.

    Times and tunes change, though, my little floaters, and the

    Waterways have changed, even in the few years the Floater has

    been afloat there are more boats, and more boaters. This is a

    fine and many-splendored thing, but does present us with a

    problem.

    The Floater has known little but fuss and bluster from BW, and

    then from CaRT, though some proclaim their threats empty and

    their powder wet, others see something new a new fit of effort

    that has won CaRT victories in Cowley and Uxbridge, and has

    taken casualties across the network boats craned out, boaters

    abandoning the Cut for a life ashore. Again some will claim that

    this is all to the good of the wider, Guidance-abiding majority,

    while some will see infringements of Human Rights and ignoral

    of law in claims of legal justification. But, the Floater wonders,

    what could the canals be like?

    Having visited Amsterdam, purely for research purposes, there

    being many waterways there, and many boats, the Floater sees

    both opportunity and cause for concern. Residential boating is

    there a very static business, boats are plumbed-in to sewage,

    water and gas-pipes, electricity. They move only to repair or

    repaint, or to scrap. Conservation status insists that an historic

    boat, if removed, may only be replaced by a similar vessel. Boat

    prices have risen to an equivalence with house prices.

    What is it that keeps this from happening in London, I hear you

    ask. Is it perhaps the narrowness of the canals, the scarcity of

    bankside along their meager length? Is it because of planning

    regulations? It is nothing more, The Floater proposes, than

    movement, in both its obligatory and its necessary aspects. One

    has a toilet to empty, a water-tank to fill, and a licence that

    obliges one to move fortnightly.

    Thus there is, undoubtedly, a level of tolerance, a point of critical

    mass at which this movement becomes impractical (at whichpoint the desirability of a boat-life, and consequently the demand

    for boats and mooring space will inevitably decline) and at which

    point the secondary use of the canals as a visitor attraction for

    boaters, walkers, locals and well rewarded poets, the

    inconvenience to residents of Noel Road, Islington, and the wear

    and tear on locks and other infrastructure may also cause

    concern. It is the Floaters honest opinion, though, and nothing

    more, that this point is, in pure fact and the like, a long way off.

    There is a thriving community on the canals and rivers of London.

    I do not begin to assume the authority, or, frankly, the affront to

    the many floaters for whom these reasons are all-too apparent,

    to try to explain exactly why, here, though I may later. It is theFloaters belief, though, that with a little more maintenance,

    development, more co-operation and imagination, the waterways

    could support a simultaneously more intensive and more

    sustainable use of this neglected opportunity to experiment with,

    even to demonstrate, alternate ways of living in this city, and of

    living in the world.

  • 7/28/2019 Floaters Summer 2013

    3/3

    Greetings from the

    Middle Place and wordsfrom the White Witch of

    Uncertain Whereabouts.

    Why are Boaters facing the great

    battle?

    Men, and the world of Men, believe that it is only

    great power that keeps evil in check. But that is not

    what I found. Ive found that it is the small things,

    every day deeds of ordinary folk that keeps the

    darkness at bay; simple acts of kindness and love.

    A document has recently been revealed to the

    White Witch, long lost to the world, now found; a

    thirty-nine page prophesy called: Pleasure and

    Profit from the Canals. Presented to me to

    translate under the sickle-moon. There are few left

    now with the gift of the objective tongue. Written at

    the waning of the Great Snatcher and in the height

    of the Neoliberal Dynasty, it foresees a dark and

    distant future for the waterways and foretells of a

    three part tearing of the Kingdom of Water. The first

    great tearing is upon us: a Trust primarily chargedwith conservation and an improvement of

    amenities it cannot hope to achieve with its feeble

    brain and hungry coffers. The second looms large

    like a Deatheater over our neighbourhoods: a

    Development Company run on entirely commercial

    criteria, that sucks the life blood from theWaterways and replaces it with capital gain and

    yuppie moorings. And the third and great rending

    yet to come: the transference of regulatory

    functions to the National Review Authority

    (responsible to the Secretary of State for the

    Environment) unleashing the Beast of Governance

    with its whipping boy Best Practice sat astride to

    attack our people for their refusal to conform, to

    become profitable, measurable, and to set fire to

    our heritage.

    It is a dark dystopian time that is foretold and the

    prophesy speaks nary a word or the humbleboater, their lives and lifestyles of quiet dissent.

    But the White Witch sees that the only way

    through the battle is the liberal Middle Way; the

    humble way of heritage that has always had

    jurisprudence on its side.

    Why are Boaters facing the great battle? Because

    they are not like most, they are used to travelling

    around, never settling in one place, never

    belonging anywhere. Boaters are not of the world

    of Men. When I am afraid and feel the best of us

    has been lost to the great evil of neoliberalism that

    the world of Man has wrought, the world of theBoater gives me courage. The boater has a great

    role to play in these battles to come and in the

    public history of us all.