Floater March 14
-
Upload
thefloater -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
Transcript of Floater March 14
-
8/12/2019 Floater March 14
1/4
AFLOAT BUT ONLY JUSTThe Spring is upon us, myfriends. A time of revival,regrowth. And a merry towpathparade of summer skirts andbare legs in shorts has caughtthe Floater quite unawares.
He has been called uponto look back, though, to TwentyTwelve. To a time when, afteran iffish Summer of on-off rain,Olympic Closuresand a PyratesRegatta, a time when somefraught battles had been
fought, and water brought tothe thirsting excluded crews,and when a caf was born.
Listen to my tale now,my little floaters.
Once there was a dis-organisation, we called itLondon Boaters[1]. It had liftedlike a Phoenix from the flames,
called into being, a humbleemail list became a fierce force
to face, in meetings, on thetowpaths we fought for ourcause and won. The Lea andStort Moorings Policy wasdefeated, lost cats were found,and lostbicyclesreturned.
But while these gainswere made, in higher halls
the House of Lords, no less another cause was fought andwon a thing called the Canaland River Trust had begun. At
the last minute a group defined
as Liveaboard Boaters Withouta Home Mooringhad had theirinterest declared, but time ranout on the Bill democracy inaction and the waterwayswere handed over, lock, stockand barrel, to the managers ofBritish Waterways.
Thus was born CaRT, theCanal and River Trust.By May Twenty Thirteen thefirst-ever National Associationof Bargee Travellers floatinggeneral meeting had been heldin a well-attended upper roomof the Malt Shovel in CowleyBridge. Nigel Moore spoke atlength, and, at times, phil-osophically upon the outcome
of his legal battles with BW andCaRT, and dwelt briefly uponsome of the niceties of the
English Constitution.Those floaters familiarwith Section 17.3 c) ii)[2] of the1995 Act should also know ofthese two 1965 Byelaws,which, the Floater has beenpartly able to recall:
Byelaw 28: Any vessel
shall be securely moored
head and stern with good
and sufficient ropes orother apparatus in such
a position as not to cause
any obstruction to the
navigation of other vessels.
Byelaw 29: No mooring
rope shall be affixed to any
sluice, lockgate, bridge or
other work of the Board not
provided for the purpose of
mooring.
Any Guidance, or terms andconditions, or charges, permitsor fines that exceeded theseprinciples, and those of themuch disputed Section 17.3
(c)(ii) were thus found to beunlawful.
Back in March of thatyear a spate of announcementsof plans and consultations,reports and proposals fromCaRT and from the InlandWaterways Association nowtheir partners in fulfilling theirCharitable Objectives[3] hadprompted the followingAnnouncement, which in turnlead to London Boaters
participation in the LondonAssembly Rapporteurship intoMooring on ondons Water-ways:TheLondon BoatersGroup haveconsensually appointed aboater to draft a Statement
which, in response to theprovocations of an alphabet of
acronyms, is intended to draw aseries of red lines in the sand,
-
8/12/2019 Floater March 14
2/4
to mix metaphors, and to offerfig leaves to embarrassed bur-
eaucrats:
London Boaters Group rejectany proposal of Local MooringPermits, as the Licensealready paid for by boaters is
all the permit anyone shouldneed. The hope that this policy
will both raise revenue for theTrust and drive down thenumber of eligible boaters tozero through their withdrawalto terrestrial accommodation,emigration or death is neithernecessary nor likely to proveeffective. London Boaters
believe rather that the year-
round presence of boaters inLondon and throughout thecountry benefits the water-ways. This has been supported
by our own research inresponse to the Lee and Stortconsultation.
Community Moorings, asunderstood by LondonBoaters, are a means of
developing offline moorings asa community run project. They
should not encroach upontowpath mooring, which will
remain open to all boaters forthe 14 day period, or longer,
as specified by Law.
Although London Boaters
welcome the introduction of
Winter Mooring Permits in theplace of towpath closures,
their proposal is that the Trustrelaxes enforcement throughthe winter, when waterway useis lower, and focus theirresources instead on keepinga steady turnover of boats onthe more popular mooringsites throughout the summer,
applying only measures in
keeping with the word and thespirit of existing legislationand in co-operation with otherwaterways users.
Current discussion of Non-Compliant Continuous Cruis-ing, Capacity, Overcrowdingand Honeypot Sites, andconsequent attempts atmanaging life on the water-
ways through restrictions,permissions and enforcement
are and will remain ill-informed and ineffective until
academic qualitative andquantitative research is
conducted.
Only when the responsibilities
of the Canal and River Trusttocarry out canal, lock andtowpath maintenance are
given their due attention, andare sufficiently financed, willthe full potential of thewaterways to provide homes,workplaces, and an attractiveand sustainable environmentfor all users be properlymeasured or understood.
London Boaters Groupbelievethat priority should be given tothe provision of services andsecurity on the towpath for all
waterways users, over andabove the current focus onrestrictions, permissions andenforcement. This will surelyresult in an improved
experience of the canals andrivers for all and the
preservation of a unique andvaluable way of life.
SPORTS NEWS IN DEPTHNigels one SonUp till now he has been a
familiar sight on the field for FCCRT, but key CRT defender
Nigel Johnson has taken an
early shower. He was involved
in todays clash between FC
CRT and NABT Athletic at the
High Court ground (result
pending) where his perform-ance was disappointing, sugg-
esting his 250,000 price-tag
was excessive, as many had felt
at the sight of his obvious
failure to reach the high
standard of play set by
renowned opposition forwardNigel Moore (then on loan from
Brentford). CRTs new Chairman
was unavailable for comment.
-
8/12/2019 Floater March 14
3/4
New Team on the BlockThe Sporting Association of
Continuous Cruisers, a new
team lead by experienced
managers previously of the First
Cub Scout Troop of Cowley
Bridge Under 21s, took the field
for the first time yesterday in a
friendly match at the FC CRTground. A series of own goals
assisted their opponents to the
unprecedented 213-0 victory
which was claimed to be a
great success. After years of
conflict, said an SACC
spokesman in a rare unguarded
moment, we believe that by
working with FC CRT we were
able to move together in co-
operation to achieve many
shared goals. We hope this
result will prove decisive in
changing the confrontational
attitude which other teams
seem to have taken to FC CRT.
They do own the pitch, ball andreferee, and they wrote the
rules of the game, after all.
Line and LengthsmenControversy continues as the
full consequences of the
Waterways Leagues replace-
ment of experienced linesmen
with volunteers sinks in. The
legality of this change was
challenged today. A spokesman
for the League said the long
and short of it is, there has
been a lot of back and forth,
and flags have been raised. We
are now locked into this, we
realise, for better or for worse,and the flood of complaints has
left our volunteers feeling
somewhat bogged down.
Many pitches are still awaiting
inspection as we write. The
Floater is anxious for some
resolution of this issue.
FOOTNOTES FOR THE FOOLHARDY OR SOME USEFUL AMMUNITION FOR THE AMOROUS[1]STATEMENT OF THE LONDONBOATERS GROUP 2011.
"London Boaters act collectively to
protect the homes and way of life of the
people who live on Londons waterways.
We reach out to all those committed to a
sustainable future for our canals and
rivers."
[2] SECTION 17 (3) OF THE BRITISH
WATERWAYS ACT 1995.
(3) Notwithstanding anything in any
enactment but subject to subsection (7)
below, the Board may refuse a relevant
consent in respect of any vessel unless
(a) the applicant for the relevant consent
satisfies the Board that the vessel
complies with the standards applicable to
that vessel;(b) an insurance policy is in
force in respect of the vessel and a copyof the policy, or evidence that it exists
and is in force, has been produced to the
Board; and (c) either(i) the Board are
satisfied that a mooring or other place
where the vessel can reasonably be kept
and may lawfully be left will be available
for the vessel, whether on an inland
waterway or elsewhere; or (ii) the
applicant for the relevant consent
satisfies the Board that the vessel to
which the application relates will be used
bona fide for navigation throughout theperiod for which the consent is valid
without remaining continuously in any
one place for more than 14 days or such
longer period as is reasonable in the
circumstances.
[3] CHARITABLE OBJECTIVES OF THE
CANAL AND RIVER TRUST.
1 Subject to Clause 1.2 and 1.3, to hold in
trust and retain in perpetuity for public
benefit the Infrastructure Property for
the following purposes: 1.1.1 to operate
and manage the Infrastructure Property
for public benefit, use and enjoyment
including: (a) for navigation; (b) for
walking on towpaths; and (c) for
recreation or other leisure-time pursuits
of the public in the interest of their
health and social welfare; 1.1.2 to protect
and conserve, for public benefit, sites,
objects and buildings of archaeological,
architectural, engineering or historic
interest on, in the vicinity of, or otherwise
associated with the Infrastructure
Property; 1.1.3 to further, for public
benefit, the conservation, protection and
improvement of the natural environment
and landscape of the Infrastructure
Property. 1.2 To use the income (which
expression shall not include the proceeds
of any Capital Disposal of the
Infrastructure Property) for the purposes
set out in Clause 2.1 and the following
purposes: 1.2.1 to protect and conserve,
for public benefit, sites, objects and
buildings of archaeological, architectural,
engineering or historic interest on, in the
vicinity of, or otherwise associated with
Inland Waterways; 1.2.2 to further, for
public benefit, the conservation, for
protection and improvement of the
natural environment and landscape of
Inland Waterways; 1.2.3 to promote,
facilitate, undertake and assist in, for
public benefit, the restoration and
improvement of Inland Waterways; 1.2.4
to promote and facilitate, for public
benefit, awareness, learning and
education about Inland Waterways, theirhistory, development, use, operation and
cultural heritage, by all appropriate
means including the provision of
museums; 1.2.5 to promote sustainable
development (as defined by Clause 13) in
the vicinity of any Inland Waterway for
the benefit of the public, in particular by:
(a) the improvement of the conditions of
life in socially and economically
disadvantaged communities in such
vicinity; (b) the promotion of sustainable
means of achieving economic growth andregeneration and the prudent use of
natural resources; and 1.2.6 to further
any purpose which is exclusively
charitable under the law of England and
Wales connected with Inland Waterways;
provided that in each case where the
Trust undertakes work in relation to
property which it does not own or hold in
trust, any private benefit to the owner of
the property is merely incidental. [the
objectives continue in this vein for some
time, though we have been forced to edit
it here for reasons of space, and of
running out of it, but we are confident
you have the most important bits. The
Editor]
-
8/12/2019 Floater March 14
4/4
LONDON BOATERS
ANNOUNCEMENTThere Will Be A Meeting.
The Meeting Will Be At St MichaelsCommunity Hall, London Fields.
The Meeting Is On April 19thFrom 1till4.
The Meeting Will Ask:
1)Who Are We?2)Why Are We Here?3)What Should We Do?4)Whats Going On?
1)Will be an opportunity for anyonewho has done workfor LB to brieflysum-up what they did.
2)Will be a discussion about the futureof the group, potentially withproposals regarding structure andpurpose.
3)Will be an attempt to reach aconsensus on structure and purpose.
4)Will be a summary discussion of thingswith which LB ought to engage.