fitch ratcdo.pdf

download fitch ratcdo.pdf

of 21

Transcript of fitch ratcdo.pdf

  • 7/27/2019 fitch ratcdo.pdf

    1/21

    A Ratings Agencys Perspective

    to Structured CreditGilbert Ong, CFA

  • 7/27/2019 fitch ratcdo.pdf

    2/21

    The Basics CDOs to CDOSquared

  • 7/27/2019 fitch ratcdo.pdf

    3/21

    3

    TypesTypes of CDO

    Cashflow> Portfolio of cash assets (loans, bonds, ABS) purchased by a special

    purpose vehicle (SPV).

    Synthetic> The SPV gains credit exposure by selling credit protection using a

    portfolio of credit derivatives.

    Market Value

    > Risk in Market Value CDOs related to asset market price, not default.> Asset market price is a function of> Rating migration (credit driven)> Spread widening (market driven)> Liquidity (market driven)

    Motivations

    Balance Sheet> Risk management

    > Regulatory requirements

    Arbitrage> Exploit pricing inefficiencies

    > Increase assets under management

  • 7/27/2019 fitch ratcdo.pdf

    4/21

    4

    Synthetic CDO

    Credit Default

    Swap

    Premium

    Credit Protection

    Payment

    Protection

    Seller

    Protection

    Buyer

    Arranging Bank

    Structure of a

    Synthetic CDO

    Protection Buyer

    (Swap

    Counterparty)

    ProtectionSeller

    (SPV)

    Credit-Linked Notes

    issued

  • 7/27/2019 fitch ratcdo.pdf

    5/21

    5

    Correlation Impact on Credit Portfolios

    > Mean remains unchanged

    > Higher correlation leads to more extreme events at both ends of the

    distribution

    Corr=10%

    STDev=5.27

    Corr=30%

    STDev=12.42

    0%

    1%

    2%

    3%

    4%

    5%

    6%

    7%

    8%

    1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49

    Number of Defaulted Assets

    Prob

    ability

    Portfolio Default Distribution ? (50 'B' rated assets)

    Mean 12.41

  • 7/27/2019 fitch ratcdo.pdf

    6/21

    6

    Common Synthetic Structures CDOs to CDO Squared

    SCDO

    Corporate

    Reference

    Pool

    (100

    names) Attachment

    Point

    Exhaustion

    Point

    > Single-Tranch CDO > Synthetic CDO2

  • 7/27/2019 fitch ratcdo.pdf

    7/21

    7

    Portfolio Loss Distribution CDOs vs CDO Squared

    > CDO Squared loss distribution has a fatter tail (max loss is higher)

    > This is due to lower granularity (only a few inner CDOs in a CDO Squared),

    higher correlation between CDOs and AP of tranches

    0

    5

    10

    1520

    25

    30

    35

    40

    0 2 4 6 810

    12

    14

    16

    18

    20

    22

    24

    26

    28

    30

    Portfolio Loss (%)

    Pro

    fita

    bility

    Portfolio Loss Distribution(100 IG Corporates)

    (%)

    Source: Fitch Ratings

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    0 3 6 912

    15

    18

    21

    24

    27

    30

    33

    36

    39

    42

    45

    48

    51

    54

    57

    60

    Portfolio Loss (%)

    Pro

    fita

    bility

    Portfolio Loss Distribution(CDO of 20 CDOs)

    (%)

    90.40%

  • 7/27/2019 fitch ratcdo.pdf

    8/21

    8

    Impact of Correlation on Credit Enhancement(Rating Loss Rate) of CDO and CDO Squared

    Rating Loss Rate Sensit ivi ty to Asset Correlation

    CDO Squared

    0.00%

    10.00%

    20.00%

    30.00%

    40.00%

    50.00%

    60.00%

    70.00%

    80.00%

    90.00%

    100.00%

    0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.20 0.22 0.24

    PCL

    RLR

    'AAA' Credit

    Enhancement

    'BBB' Credit

    Enhancement

    Aver age Po rt fo lio Cor re lation Level (PCL)

    Rating Loss Rate (RLR) Sensi tivity to Asset

    Correlation

    Single Layer CDO

    0.00%

    1.00%

    2.00%

    3.00%

    4.00%

    5.00%

    6.00%

    7.00%

    8.00%

    0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.20 0.22 0.24

    PCL

    RLR

    'AAA' CreditEnhancement

    'BBB' Credit

    Enhancement

    Aver age Po rt fo lio Cor re lati on Level (PCL)

  • 7/27/2019 fitch ratcdo.pdf

    9/21

    Fitch Rating Approach

  • 7/27/2019 fitch ratcdo.pdf

    10/21

    10

    VECTOR

    Theory -

    Structural

    Form Model

    > Default occurs if: Value of Assets < Value of Liabilities

    > In a Monte Carlo Simulation

    > The company defaults if

    > a randomly drawn number representing the change in asset value

    > Falls below the DEFAULT THRESHOLD

    > Default threshold derived from Ratings and Historical Default Rates

    > Cholesky decomposition used to incorporate asset correlations

    > VECTOR runs multi-period Monte Carlo simulation

    Book Liabilities

    Asset Value

    Time TNow

  • 7/27/2019 fitch ratcdo.pdf

    11/21

    11

    FitchRatings

    CDO Rating

    Criteria

    The Fitch default VECTOR model

    > A multi-step Monte Carlo simulation model

    > For Cash Flow CDOs: Used in conjunction with Cash Flow

    model Sector specific correlation assumptions

    > 25 industries and 34 countries

    > 6 ABS sectors, 17 Sub Sectors, 22 countries/regions

    Recovery rates tiered by ratings stress

    An empirically based CDO default matrix

    For Cash Flow CDOs: Revised interest rate and currency assumptionsfor CF Modeling

    For Fully Managed CDOs: An adjustment for asset manager ratings

    Ability to analyze short positions in credits and in CDO tranches (within aCDO Squared)

    Added new functionality to accommodate CDO Squared Transactions

    > Look-through approach

    > Cross-subordination

    > Overlap Analysis

  • 7/27/2019 fitch ratcdo.pdf

    12/21

    12

    Portfolio Inputs cont

    Default

    Probability

    Recovery

    Rate

    Asset

    Correlation

    Term

    Rating

    Asset

    Type

    Country

    Industry/

    Sector

    Asset Par

    Value

    Monte Carlo

    Simulation

    Default Distribution

    (Rating Default

    Rate or RDR)

    Loss Distribution

    (Rating Loss Rate

    or RLR)

    Recovery Rate Stress

    (Rating Recovery Rate

    or RRR)

    Timing of Default

  • 7/27/2019 fitch ratcdo.pdf

    13/21

    13

    Fitch Report: Comparative Empirical Study of AssetCorrelation (6 June 2005)

    > Vector Model> Use of equity correlation data to derive asset correlation

    > Can capture differences in di fferent regions, e.g. Europe, North America, Asia, and so for th

    > Can yield name-specific pairwise correlations. Any possible (overestimation) bias can be adjusted by calibration> De Servigny and Renault:

    > Averages the joint defaul t probabil ity by weighing i t by the number of obl igors in each cohor t.

    > Frey and McNeal:> Joint default probabilities are aggregated using a simple average over all of the cohorts.

    > RACM or Robust Average Correlation Measure:> Average of the Frey-McNei l and De Servigny-Renault .

    > Gupton, Finger, and Bhatia

    > Does not explicitly use timing o f the defaults.> Rating Transition Model

    > measured directly using the co-movement of ratings. Cannot capture differences in regional dynamics (Asia vs. North America)

  • 7/27/2019 fitch ratcdo.pdf

    14/21

    14

    Credit Default

    Swaps

    Referencing

    ABS

    > Developments

    > Retention of bankruptcy / insolvency

    > FTP Interest recognises concept of PiK> New Credit Events

    > Permanent Loss

    > Rating Downgrade

    > Valuation> Extended valuation period

    > Minimum Recovery Rates> Fixed Recovery Rates

    > Challenges

    > Corporate Credit Events not Applicable> Bankruptcy

    > Failure to Pay> Insolvency

    > Pass through/long dated maturity structure of ABS Assets

    > Illiquidity / transparency

    > ISDA has formed working groups towards developing

    standards.

  • 7/27/2019 fitch ratcdo.pdf

    15/21

    15

    Credit Event Definitions and Valuation Process

  • 7/27/2019 fitch ratcdo.pdf

    16/21

    16

    Credit Event Study for 2004

  • 7/27/2019 fitch ratcdo.pdf

    17/21

    17

    Factors to consider in determining recovery ratehaircuts due to valuation process

    > the time period over which the bids are conducted and how soon

    they begin after the occurrence of a credit event;> the source and number of bids: a low number of bids and bids that

    include transaction participants in the valuation process have

    tended to produce below-average recoveries;

    > the number of valuation dates;

    > how the final value is calculated (i.e. the highest bid, the average

    of bids, etc.);

    > the ability to include partial bids and WA quotations before

    assuming a zero recovery value.

  • 7/27/2019 fitch ratcdo.pdf

    18/21

    18

    Analysis of

    Short Positions

    0%

    20%

    40%

    60%

    80%

    100%

    -5.0

    %

    -4.0

    %

    -3.0

    %

    -2.0

    %

    -1.0

    %

    0.0

    %

    1.0

    %

    2.0

    %

    3.0

    %

    4.0

    %

    5.0

    %

    6.0

    %

    7.0

    %

    8.0

    %

    9.0

    %

    Cumulative Portfolio Loss

    Cumula

    tive

    Pro

    ba

    bility

    No Shorts 20 Shorts 40 shorts

    # of Shorts

    40200Confidence Level

    6%7%8%99%

    5%5%5%95%

    Effect of Short Positions on RLR

  • 7/27/2019 fitch ratcdo.pdf

    19/21

    19

    Synthetic

    Index: A

    surveillance

    tool

    > Definition

    > Scope: 260 Fitch rated static synthetic corporate

    CDOs 1160 underlying corporate names, comprising

    the index

    > Measure: WAR tracking CDO portfolio performance> Reporting frequency: Monthly

    > Uses

    > Tool to track CDO performance by vintage /

    manager / type

    > A proxy for CDS name liquidity> An indicator of negative name selection

    > A tool to track macro credit trends

    Chart above presents five vintage indices, which follow the same methodology as for the Synthetic Index calculation,except that the reference universe for the vintage indices comprises only those transactions which closed in the

    respective period.

  • 7/27/2019 fitch ratcdo.pdf

    20/21

    20

    CDO

    S.M.A.R.T.

    SurveillanceMetrics

    Analytics

    ResearchTools

  • 7/27/2019 fitch ratcdo.pdf

    21/21

    www.fitchratings.com