,

.,

*

IULATzo xwwu*

. . . _ _

.m ,.,

I- 00{t[RC '

g

q g.:1 h\ 50

sCEE}kk0FF .^CE [g [thSER00 E ge

UNITED STATES OF AMERICANUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

In the Matter'of )PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, ) Docket Nos. STN 50-522

et al. ) STN 50-523(Skagit/Hanford Nuclear Project) )

) Date: September 1, 1982

APPLICANTS' FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIESTO NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL

Applicants hereby serve their First Set of Interrogatories to

the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) pursuant to 10

C.F.R. 5 2.740b. Each interrogatory is to be answered fully in

writing, under oath or affirmation, by an officer or agent of

NRDC and is to include all pertinent information known to NRDC.

Each answer should clearly indicate the interrogatory to which it

is intended to be responsive.

Under NRC regulations (10 C.F.R. $ 2.740(e)) parties are

required to supplement responses to interrogatories under certain

circumstances when new and/or different information becomes.available. NRCD is obligated to comply with this requirement

with respect to its answers to Applicants' First Set of Inter-

rogatories.

| -1-

8209100264 820901PDR ADOCK 05000522

| C PDRI

_. _ , _ , _ - -

*.

.

|

"NRDC" shall include all agents, employees, attorneys, in-

vestigators, and all other persons directly or indirectly subject

to NRDC's control in any way. "You" and "Yours" refers to NRDC.

" Documents" means all written or recorded material of any

kind or character known to NRDC or in its possession, custody, or

control, including, without limitation, letters, correspondence,

telegrams, memoranda, notes, records, minutes, contracts, agree-,

ments, records or notation of telephone or personal conversations

or conferences, inter-office communications, microfilm, bulle-

tins, circulars, pamphlets, studies, notices, summaries, reports,

books, articles, treatises, teletype messages, invoices, taperecordings, computer printouts, and work-sheets. '

When used with respect to a document, " identify" means, with-

out limitation, to state its date, the type of document (e.g.,

letter, memorandum, telegram, chart, photograph, sound reproduc-

tion, etc.), the author and addressees, the present location and

custodian, and a description of its contents.

When use with respect to a person, " identify" means, without

limitation, to state his or her name, address and occupation.,

If NRDC cannot answer any portion of any of the interroga-

tories in full, after exercising due diligence to do so, Iso>

state, and answer to the extent possible, specifying the inabil-

ity to answer the remainder and stating when NRDC expects to be fable to answer the unanswered portions.

-2-

|

..

.,

INTERROGATORIES

1. With respect to the NRDC contentions as phrased and ad-

mitted by the Licensing Board in its Memorandum and Order of

July 6, 1982, identify all of NRDC's bases for each contention.1'

2. With respect to each basis identified in your answer to

Interrogatory 1, state whether the basis is supported by:

A. One or more documents.

B. Any type of study, calculation, or analysis.

C. Research.

D. Conversations, consultations, correspondence, or

any other type of communications with one or more individuals.

3. If your answer to Interrogatory 2 is one or more docu-

ments:

A. Identify each such document.

B. Identify the information in each document which

supports the basis.

C. Explain how such information provides support for

the basis.

4. If your answer to Interrogatory 2 is any type of study,

calculation, or analysis:

A. Describe the nature of the study, calculation, or

analysis and identify any documents which discuss or describe-

the study, calculation, or analysis.

:

I -3-

||

__

.

..

,

B. When and where was the study, calulation or analy-sis performed?

C. Identify the person [s] who performed the study,

calculation, or analysis.

D. Describe the results of each study, calculation, or.

analysis.

E. Explain how such study, calculation, or analysis,

provides support for the basis.

5. If your answer to Interrogatory 2 is research:

A. Describe all such research and indentify each docu-

ment discussing or describing such research.

'B. When and where was the research conducted?

C. Identify the person (s) who conducted the research.

D. Explain how such research provides support for the

basis.

6. If your answer to Interrogatory 2 is conversations, con-

sultations, correspondence, or any other type of communications

with one or more individuals:

A. Identify each such individual.

B. State the educational and professional background

of each such individual, including occupation and institu-j

tional affiliations.

C. Describe the nature of each communication with each (

such individual, when it occurred, and identify all other

individuals involved.

-4-

. _ _ - _ _ _ _ . _

-.

*

.

D. Describe the information received from each such

individual and explain how it provides support for the basis.

E. Identify each letter, memorandum, tape, note or

other record related to each conversation, correspondence, or

other communication with such individual.

' 7. Does NRDC intend to offer the testimony of any witnesses

at the evidentiary hearings in this proceeding? If yes,

A. Identify each such witness.

B. State the educational and professional background

of each such witness, including occupation and institutional

aff.liations.

C. Specify the sul aatter, by contention and

basis, upon which each suen witness will testify.

8. Does NRDC intend to offer any documents for introduction

into evidence at the evidentiary hearings in this proceeding? If

yes,

A. Indentify each such document.

B. Specify the subject matter, by contention and ,

basis, to which each such document relates.

C. Identify the 'information in each such document ^

which relates to the contention and basis.

D. Explain how the information identified in Inter-

rogatory 8.C provides support for the contention and basis.x .

x - \N

o

-s- y

n'i

' r,

- . . . +

.

** ,. .

.

9. Does NRDC intend to offer any evidence in the evidenti-

ary hearings in this proceeding which is not identified in youranswer to Interrogatory 7.A or 8.A? If yes,

> A. Identify the nature of each such evidence.

B. Specify the subject matter, by contention and

basis, to which each such evidence relates.

C. Explain how such evidence provides support for the,

,

contention and basis.

DATED: September 1, 1982

Respectfully submitted,

PERKINS, COIE, STONE,OLSEN & WILLIAMS

--f C/1F. Theodore Thomsen

Attorneys for Applicants1900 Washington BuildingSeattle, Washington 98101Phone (206) 682-8770

Of Counsel:David G. PowellSteven P. FrantzLowenstein, Newman, Reis & Axelrad1025 Connecticut Avenue, N.W--

Washington, D.C. 20036(202) 862-8400

| -6-

,

- .. .. . - . _ _ - ._ . -_

r e

-..

,

Uht C

Ihn h.9'

UNITED STATE F'

NUCLEAR REGULA. Y OMMISSION

BEFORETHEATOMICSAFSTYICBED5ITMfSINGBOARD00CW%Cii

In the Matter of ))

PUGET SOUND POWE2 & LIGHT COMPANY, ) DOCKET NOS.et al. )

) STN 50-522(Skagit/Hanford Nuclear Project, ) STN 50-523Units 1 and 2) )

)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

1

I hereby certify that the following:

1. Applicants' First Set of Interrogatories to the Coalitionfor Safe Power;

2. Applicants' First Set of Interrogatories to NWF/OEC; and

3. Applicants' First Set of Interrogatories to Natural ResourcesDefense Council,

in the above-captioned proceeding have been served upon the persons

shown on the attached list by depositing copies thereof in the

United States mail on September 1, 1982 with proper

postage affixed for first class mail.

DATED: September 1, 1982

'

,

1 "F. Theodore Thomsen

! Attorney for Puget Sound Power &! Light' Company| 1900 Washington Building

Seattle, Washington 98101

cAYE september 1, 1982SKAGIT/flANFO?S NUCLEAR PIGJECTNRC Sarvics LictDockst Nos. STN 50-522 cnd ETN 50-523

COMMISSION NRC STAFF APPLICANTS (cont.)Secretary of the Commission Richa rd L. Black, Esq. Warren G. Hastings, Esq.Docketing and Service Branch Counsel for the NRC Staf f Associate Corporate CounselU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Portland General Electric CompanyWashington, D.C. 20555 Office of the Executive Legal 121 S.W. Salmon StreetDirector Portland, OR 97204LICENSING BOARD Washington, D.C. 20555

Richard D. Bach, req.John F. Wolf, Esq., Chairman INTERESTED STATES AND COUNTIESAdministrative Judge Stoel, Rives, Boley, Fraser & Wyse

2300 Georgia Pacific BuildingAtomic Safety and Licensing Board Washington Energy Facility Site 900 S.W. Fifth Avenue3409 Shepherd Street Evaluation Council Portland, OR 97204Chevy Chase. MD 20015 Nicholas D. Lewis, ChairmanMail Stop PY-Il OTNERDr. Frank F. Hooper Olympia, WA 98504

Administrative Judge Nina Bell, Staff IntervenorAtomic Safety and Licensing Board Kevin M. Ryan, Esq. Coalition for Safe PowerSchool of Natural Resources Washington Assistant Attorney Suite 527, Governor BuildingUniversity of Michigan General 40G S.W. Second AvenueAnn Arbor, MI 48190 Temple of Justice Portland, OR 97204*

Olympia, WA 98504Mr. Gustave A. Linenberger Ralph Cavanagh, Esq.Administrative Judge Frank W. Ostrander, Jr. , Esq. Natural Resources Defense CouncilAtomic Safety and Licensing Board Oregon Assistant Attorney General 25 Kearny StreetU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 500 Pacific Duilding San Francisco, CA 94108Washington, D.C. 20555 520 S.W. Yamhill

Portland, OR 97204 Terence L. Thatcher, Esq.APPEAL BOARD NWF and OECBill Sebero, Chairman 708 Dekusa Building

Alan S. Rosenthal, Chairman Benton County Commissioner 519 S.W. Third AvenueAtomic Safety and Licensing P.O. Box 470 Portland, OR 97204Appeal Board Prosser, WA 99350U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, D.C. 20555 APPLICAfffS Attorney for Columbia River

Inter-Tribal Fish CormaissionDr. John H. Buck, Member F. Theodore Thomsen 'Atomic Safety and Licensing Perkins, Cole, Stone, N Sandy Blvd.Appeal Board Olsen & Williams Portland, OR 97220

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Cossaission 1900 Washington Building James B. HovisWashington, D.C. 20555 Seattle, WA 98101 Yakima Indian Nationc/o Hovis, Cockrill & RoyMichael C. Farrar, Member David G. Powell, Esq. 316 North Third StreetAtomic Safety and Licensing Lowenstein, Newman, Reis & Axelrad P.O. Box 48]Appeal Board 1025 Connecticut Avenue N.W. Yakima, WA 98907

,

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Conunission Washington, D.C. 20036Washington, D.C. 20555 Canadian Consulate GeneralJames W. Durham, Esq. Donald Martens, Consul

Senior Vice President 412 Plaza 600General Counsel and Secretary 6th and Stewart Street*

Portland General Electric Company Seattle, WA 98101121 S.W. Salmon Street*Portland, OR 97204

.-

a..

7-26-82.