First Result from the pp2pp Experiment Włodek Guryn for pp2pp collaboration Brookhaven National...

First Result from the pp2pp Experiment Włodek Guryn

for pp2pp collaboration Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY, USA

•Introduction – pp2pp physics program;

•Description of the experiment;

•Engineering run in 2002;

•Data analysis and results;

•Summary and outlook.

Small x and Diffraction Sept. 17-20, 2003 FNAL Włodek Guryn

2

Total and Differential Cross Sections, and Polarization Effects in pp Elastic Scattering at RHIC

S. Bueltmann, B. Chrien, A. Drees, R. Gill, W. Guryn*, I. H. Chiang, D. Lynn, C. Pearson, P. Pile, A. Rusek, M. Sakitt, S. Tepikian

Brookhaven National Laboratory, USA

J. Chwastowski, B. PawlikInstitute of Nuclear Physics, Cracow, Poland

M. HaguenauerEcole Polytechnique/IN2P3-CNRS, Palaiseau, France

A. A. Bogdanov, S.B. Nurushev, M.F Runtzo, M. N. StrikhanovMoscow Engineering Physics Institute (MEPHI), Moscow, Russia

I. G. Alekseev, V. P. Kanavets, L. I. Koroleva, B. V. Morozov, D. N. SviridaITEP, Moscow, Russia

M. Rijssenbeek, C. Tang, S. YeungSUNY Stony Brook, USA

K. De, N. Guler, J. Li, N. OzturkUniversity of Texas at Arlington, USA

A. SandaczInstitute for Nuclear Studies, Warsaw, Poland

* spokesman


3

Polarized Proton Collisions in RHIC

~12 10-6m after scraping

BRAHMS & PP2PP (p)

STAR (p)

PHENIX (p)

AGS

LINACBOOSTER

Pol. Proton Source500 A, 300 s

GeVs

cmsL

50050

onPolarizati%70

102 2132max

Spin Rotators

Partial Siberian Snake

Siberian Snakes

200 MeV Polarimeter AGS Internal Polarimeter

Rf Dipoles

RHIC pC PolarimetersAbsolute Polarimeter (H jet)

2 1011 Pol. Protons / Bunch = 20 mm mrad

AGS pC Polarimeters

Strong AGS Snake


4

RHIC has the UNIQUE capability for colliding POLARIZED proton beams, further elucidating the exchange dynamics:

– Beam energy between 25 and 250 GeV;– Transverse polarization up to 70%;– Polarization can be chosen on a bunch-by-bunch basis (good for eliminating detection systematics!);

Allows to measure spin dependence of proton-proton elastic scattering

CNI region:

0.0004 < -t < 0.02 (GeV/c)2 √s = 200 GeV

0.0004 < -t < 0.13 (GeV/c)2 √s = 500 GeV

tot, , B, d/dt, AN(t), ANN(t)

ot = 600 barn (~1%), = 0.005 (4%), AN(t), ANN(t) = 0.001

Medium |t| region:

0.02 < -t < 1.3 (GeV/c)2 √s = 500 GeV

diffractive minimum (peaks and bumps) and their spin dependence

PP2PP Physics program

Design parameters


5

pp2pp experiment studies the dynamics and spin dependence of hadronic interaction through proton-proton elastic scattering

P, O -1Cor 1 C

Vacuum QM exchanged

p

pp

pp

pp

p

Pomeron(C=+1)

Odderon(C=1)+

Perturbative QCD Picture

OP

OP

AAppppA

AAppppA

)(

)(

s = (p1 + p2 )2 = (C.M energy)2 t = (p1 – p3 )2 = - (four momentum transfer)2

s t 1 (GeV/c)2 – Non-perturbative regimeElastic scattering d/dt + optical theorem total cross section tot


6

M

50 500

PP2PPHighest energy so far:

pp: 63 GeV (ISR)

pp: 1.8 TeV (Tevatron)

pp2pp energy range:

50 GeV s 500 GeV

pp2pp t-range:

(at s = 500 GeV)

4•10–4 GeV2 |t | 1.3 GeV2

Summary of Existing Data


7

Principle of Measurement

Elastically scattered protons have very small scattering angle θ, hence beam transport magnets determine trajectory scattered protons

The optimal position for the detectors is where scattered protons are well separated from beam protons

Need Roman Pot to measure scattered protons close to beam without breaking accelerator vacuum

Beam transport equations relate measured position at detector to scattering angle x = a11 x0 + Leff θx Optimize so that a11 small and Leff large

θx = a12 x0 + a22 θx x0 can be eliminated by measuring θx

*

x : Position at Detector

θx : Angle at Detector

x0 : Position at Interaction Point

θx : Scattering Angle at IP*

Similar equations for y-coordinate

We found that because of the roll, misalignment, of the quadrupoles there is a mixing between x and y.


8

pp2pp Experimental Setup in Engineering run 2002Elastic and Inelastic Detectors

2×4 Scintillation Counter planes, 2.5|| 5.5

0. 100. m -100. m

D0

RP Stations

IR DX D0

RP Stations

-50. m 50. m


9

Running Conditions in 2002Running conditions during a pp2pp, 14 hour dedicated run:

Beam momentum p = 100 GeV/c

Number of bunches per beam NB = 55 used 35 bunches

Beam scraped to emittance ε 12 π •10-6 m

and intensity I 5•1011 protons in each beam

Beam optics used β* = 10 m

Beam polarization (working #) Pb = 0.24 0.02

Closest approach of first detector strip to beam about

15 mm 15 beam tmin = -4•10-3 GeV2

Collected ~1 million triggers of which >30 % are elastic events


10

Data Analysis: ColinearityCorrelation plots of x- and y-coordinates using elastic triggers with reconstructed tracks of scattered protons


11

Beam Angular Divergence

Good agreement between width of θx and θy distributions for measured and simulated events with emittance of:

ε = 12 π •10-6 m

And vertex size:

z = 70 cm

Δθx 150 μrad

Δθy 70 μrad

N. Öztürk

ΔθyΔθx

N. Öztürk


12

Event Reconstruction

Elastic event: good track in two “opposite” set of detectors

• SSD coordinate was calculated using energy weighted average of the position of the strips belonging to the isolated cluster of no more than three hits;

• Correlation between tracks in two Roman Pots:

require that (x2 + y2) be within “radius” : (x2 + y2) < 16 (x2 + y

2 );

• At least six out of eight hits belong to the track;

• No more than two planes with hits in “non” elastic arm;

• Select events within uniform t-acceptance tcut


13

|t |--AcceptanceFind region in |t |- and -space with full acceptance coverage and high statistics

t = - ( pbeam •θ ) 2

= azimuthal angle

Event Sample 196,000 events:

159,250 events ( 0 < < 180º )

122,437 events ( 45º < < 135º )

58,511 events ( 45º < < 135º )

& 0.010 GeV2 |t | 0.019 GeV2 )


14

Extracting B from dN/dt-Distribution

ddt

= GE

t2

tot2

e+Bt

GE tot

e+½Bt t

+

+

[

]

C

Fit |t |-distribution with

fixing tot51.6 mb and 0.13 and keeping B as a free parameter in range 0.010 GeV2 |t | 0.019 GeV2results in

B = ( 16.3 1.6 ) GeV-2

Depends on detector position

Depends on beam transport element positions

B = ( 16.3 1.6 ) GeV-2


15

Systematic and Correlation Errors

Systematic Errors were evaluated using Monte Carlo simulations:

1. Beam emmitence;

2. Vertex position spread in x, y, z;

3. Incoming beam angels – major source;

4. Beam transport uncertainty;

Total Systematic Error 0.9 (GeV/c)-2

Correlation between fitted parameter B and values of and :

±4 mb => –/+ 0.07 (GeV/c)-2

±0.02 => ±0.32 (GeV/c)-2


16

RESULTb = 16.3 ± 1.6 (stat.) ± 0.9 (syst.) (GeV/c)-2

Analysis done by two independent groups is in agreement.

)1'(2

0

40

)(/

)/ln()(

t

dtd

s

stFdtd

where

dtdtb

E710: 0.02<-t<0.08

CDF: 0.025 <-t < 0.08

UA4: 0.0008<-t < 0.12


17

Donnachie&Landshoff

OPE ModelBourrely, Soffer, Wu


18

Single spin asymmetry AN arises in CNI region mainly from interference of hadronic non-flip amplitude with electromagnetic spin-flip amplitude

AN(t ) =N (t) + N(t) - N (t) - N(t) 1

Pbeam• cos N (t) + N(t) + N (t) + N(t) Im [ Φ5

* Φ+ ]

dσ / dtfor small t

Preliminary

Fit N / cos = 0.016 ± 0.007

Preliminary

AN = 0.033 ± 0.018


19

Running Conditions 2002-03 2002 2003 Beam momentum 100 GeV Number of bunches 55 * 10m |t|-range 0.01-0.02 (GeV/c)2 Proton intensity 51011 191011 Proton polarization 0.24 0.37 Number of Roman Pot stations 2 4 Number of Silicon planes 16 32 Number of elastic events 3105 3106

Expected statistical errors Difraction cone slope: b 1.6 0.35 Raw asymmetry:

N 0.007 0.001 Total crossection:

tot - 5-10%

Systematic error improvement in 2003 due to: Excellent silicon detector efficiency; Measurement of local angles with new Roman Pot stations; Improved beam optics measurement; Van der Meer beam scans for luminosity measurement.

Systematic error improvement in 2003 due to: Excellent silicon detector efficiency; Measurement of local angles with new Roman Pot stations; Improved beam optics measurement; Van der Meer beam scans for luminosity measurement.


20

Conclusions and Plans

•ConclusionsA promising physics result for b and AN from engineering run 2002

Excellent silicon detector performance in physics run 2003

Good statistics obtained - waiting for physics results.

•New proposal for 2004 and beyond (to be considered by PAC Sept 29, 2003)Run with current setup (tot, d/dt, b, , AN, ANN)

*=20 m, pbeam=100 GeV/c 0.003<|t|<0.02(GeV/c)2;

*=10 m, pbeam=250 GeV/c 0.025<|t|<0.12(GeV/c)2.

Put Roman Pots between DX and D0 magnets (d/dt, b, AN, ANN)

*=3m, pbeam= 250 [100] GeV/c 0.2<|t|<1.3(GeV/c)2 [0.02<|t|<0.12(GeV/c)2 .]

Upgrade RHIC quadrupoles power supply at our IP to run with *=100m and move Roman Pots to 70m position (tot, d/dt, b, , AN, ANN)

*=100m, pbeam=100 and 250 GeV/c |t| CNI region


21

Spin Physics with pp2ppFive helicity amplitudes describe proton-proton elastic scattering

Φ1(s,t ) <++|M|++>

Φ2(s,t ) <++|M|-->

Φ3(s,t ) <+-|M|+->

Φ4(s,t ) <+-|M|-+>

Φ5(s,t ) <++|M|+->

σtot = Im [ Φ+(s,t ) ]t=0

8 π

sMeasure:

Φn(s,t ) <h3 h4 |M|h1 h2>

with hx = s-channel helicity

p1 = -p2 incoming protons

p3 = -p4 scattered protons

Φ+(s,t ) = ½ ( Φ1(s,t ) + Φ3(s,t ) )

dσdt = ( |Φ1|2 + |Φ2|2 + |Φ3|2 + |Φ4|2 | + 4|Φ5|2 )

2 πs 2

ΔσT = - Im [ Φ2(s,t ) ]t=0 = σ

- σ

8 π

s

ΔσL = Im [ Φ1(s,t ) - Φ3(s,t ) ]t=0 = σ

- σ

8 π

s


22

=yD

D

xD

D

y

x

*0

*0

y

x

y

x

44342414

332313

24232212

141211

aaaa

Laaa

aaaa

aaLa

yeff

xeff

44342414

332313

24232212

141211

aaaa

Laaa

aaaa

aaLa

yeff

xeff

44342414

332313

24232212

141211

aaaa

Laaa

aaaa

aaLa

yeff

xeff

Actual transport: (x0, y0) not known also coupled because of the quad roll

Yellow Blue

First Result from the pp2pp Experiment Włodek Guryn for pp2pp collaboration Brookhaven National...

Documents

Transcript of First Result from the pp2pp Experiment Włodek Guryn for pp2pp collaboration Brookhaven National...