Fire Safety Engineering by David Barber
description
Transcript of Fire Safety Engineering by David Barber
Does Wood Burn ? The Fire Safety of Solutions in Wood
David Barber
ArupFire Group Leader - Australasia Region
David Barber
Does Wood Burn ? The Fire Safety of Solutions in Wood
Does Wood Burn ?
I have the hardest job - convince the audience that it is ok to have elements within a building that burn, even the structure
Does Wood Burn ?
Wood burns – how it burns is important
Concept 1:Can Fire Performance Be Predicted ?
Concept 1:Can Fire Performance Be Predicted ?
Fire performance of wood has been studied for many years:
1. Research dates back to 13th century
2. Solid wood has highly predictable performance in fire
3. Little variability between countries in species type
4. Knowledge = data = confidence
Concept 2:Not All Wood Is The Same
Concept 2:Not All Wood Is The Same
Concept 2:Not All Wood Is The Same
Concept 2:Not All Wood Is The Same
Concept 2:Not All Wood Is The Same
I
Scale Matters !
Concept 3:How Does Wood Burn ?
Concept 3:How Does Wood Burn ?
Char:
Natural protection for wood
Allows for continued, but diminishing strength during a fire
Well studied and well understood and is predictable
Different wood – different char (due to density and water content)
Concept 3:How Does Wood Burn ?
The importance of char:
Concept 4:Expected Fire Performance
Concept 4:Expected Fire Performance
National Construction Code:
Performance Requirement CP 1 -
“A building must have elements which will, to the degree necessary, maintain structural stability during a fire appropriate to.......”
Structural wood needs to provide an equivalent level of performance as concrete or steel
Concept 4:Expected Fire Performance
Concrete:
- Inherent protection
In a fire:
- Spalling (>600C)- Exposed steel- Bending- Failure is very rare
Concept 4:Expected Fire Performance
Protected Steel:
- Reliant on inherent strength and applied protection
In a fire:
- Will deflect (>550C)- Protection limits heat- Unlikely to collapse- Need replacement
Concept 4:Expected Fire Performance
Structural Wood:
- Inherent protection from char
In a fire:
- Will deflect- Unlikely to collapse- Need replacement
Concept 4:Expected Fire Performance
Summary:
1. Concrete – fire resistive, elements may need replacement after a major fire
2. Steel – fire resistant with additional protection, will need replacement after a major fire
3. Structural wood - fire resistant, will need replacement after a major fire
Concepts:Summary
Concepts for fire performance of wood:
1. Fire performance is well understood
2. Not all wood is the same - scale matters
3. Solid wood chars – which has predictable performance in fire
4. In a fully developed fire, wood can perform equivalent or better than steel
What Does the NCC Allow for Solutions in Wood ?
What Does the NCC Allow for Solutions in Wood ?
Summary of limitations:
1. Type A construction (non-combustible) is required for:• Class 5 (office) – Rise in storeys of 4
or more• Class 2 or 3 (residential) – Rise in
storeys of 3 or more
2. Type A - all elements must be non-combustible (except a mezzanine), hence no wood permitted.......
What Does the NCC Allow for Solutions in Wood ?
So, how is wood used in buildings ?
1. NCC allows fire engineering solutions for areas of non-compliance (so called “performance based” approach)
2. Fire engineering solutions will need a good fire engineer, who understands structural wood solutions, understands the process of approval and design implementation
Solutions in Wood - Facades
Solutions in Wood – Facades
Solutions in Wood – Internal Elements
Case Study – 5 Storey Building
Case Study – 5 Storey Building
1. Could be concrete, steel or solid wood structure
2. NCC - 120 mins FRL to structure, separations
2. Many different fire protection options • Fire rated compartmentation• Smoke detection• Sprinkler protection• Additional stairs
Case Study – 5 Storey Building
1. Wood structure and steel are very similar from a fire safety view point
2. Using sprinklers with a trade off in fire ratings, reducing to 60 minutes FRL
3. Structural wood was determined as the better option
4. Wood elements can be pre-assembled off site for quicker construction
Case Study – 5 Storey Building
1. Solid wood structure of columns and beams, inherent FRL with load bearing capacity in excess of 60 mins FRL
2. Wood assumed to not have any plasterboard protection (not required to be maintained)
3. Steel would require protective coating (sprayed or paint) to achieve 60 mins FRL (requiring maintenance)
Case Study – 5 Storey Building
Designing details
1. Assist with detailing for:• Connections• Floor and structure connections• Edge details
2. Penetrations for building services are complex to solve
3. Facade interface with wood edge beams are problematic
Case Study – 5 Storey Building
Case study summary:
1. Performance requirements of the NCC can be met using structural wood
2. Designs can gain approval, provided the engineering is substantive
3. Similar approach to any other fire engineered solution
Summary
Wood does burn – but we understand how
Structural wood is equivalent or better than structural steel in many built situations
A lack of understanding of the fire performance of wood by many
Wood can be used, but you need a fire engineering solution
Does Wood Burn ? The Fire Safety of Solutions in Wood
David BarberArupFire Group Leader – Australasia Region
Questions?