Financing the LPG Value Chain - Nigeria LPGAS
Transcript of Financing the LPG Value Chain - Nigeria LPGAS
Financing the LPG Value Chain
3rd Annual NLPGA Conference
Riverbank Capital
Thursday, 28 November 2013
Page
1 Correla)ons-‐Energy & Poverty 3
2 LPG Value Chain 12
3 LPG – Financing the Sector 16
4 LPG – How Financiers view the Sector 23
5 Conclusion 28
2
CORRELATIONS
3
Correlation between Energy Access & National Poverty
Poverty Levels in Nigeria (30 year trend)
4
The Nigeria has no history of budge)ng for cooking energy programmes. Un)l recently, governments at all levels, almost without excep)on had not addressed the cooking energy challenges faced by poor families.
Correlations…Electricity Use Highest in Cities
Household Electricity Access by State (x 1 million)
5
Talk of extremes, in Lagos State virtually all the 1.7 million households are connected to the grid. At the other end, over one million households in Kano are not connected to the grid
Correlations…northern parts of the country have over 90% of households that depend on firewood for cooking
% Household Firewood Use by State
6
Correlation…More families in the South use kerosene for cooking than in the North
% Household Kerosene Use for Cooking by State
7
Correlations…Per capita LPG use in Nigeria is one of the lowest in Africa, despite being one of the world's leading exporter of natural gas
% Household LPG Use for Cooking by State
8
Even in Lagos and the FCT -‐ two states that top the na)onal LPG usage, the number of households cooking with gas is s)ll dismally low.
Correlations…A majority (56%) of households in semi urban and urban areas depend primarily on firewood for cooking.
Household Energy Use Profile Use for Urban Areas
9
Inadequate access to finance: Families and SMEs have no available financial products that enable them to acquire pro-‐poor energy services such as clean burning LPG cook-‐stoves.
Correlations… 38% of households in Nigeria buy firewood with a 2007 survey showing that households in urban areas spend significant portion 50-75% of their budget on buying firewood
Monthly Expenditure on Firewood and charcoal by Urban Households (Naira)
10
Affordability is therefore key to encourage switching and increased LPG usage with a target average monthly spending of N2,774 on poor fuel sources
Correlations… Just 1% of grants and intervention funds have been directed to energy access & environmental issues with the latter taking the lions share
Sectoral breakdown of grants to Nigeria 1999-2007
11
Lack of global governmental priority means financing for the sector must come from private sector
LPG VALUE CHAIN
12
13
• 30 Nos Depots & Warehouses • $30m ($1m each)
• 500 Trucks • $25m ($50k each)
• 3million Bottles (over 3years) • $114m ($38 each)
• 1 million Stoves • $30m ($30 each)
14
• 15-30,000MT Vessel • $30-50m
• 40,000MT New Storage • 500,000 MT
Throughput • $150-200m
• 100 Bridgers & 200 Bobtails • $26m ($100k and
$80k respectively)
• 12 No Bottling Plants • $120m ($10m each)
Requirements for a 500,000 MT LPG Annual National Usage (10% of Population Using)
Total Investment for a 500,000 MT LPG Annual National Usage is $525m-$595m
• Depots & Warehouses – 10% • $50m
• Retail – 22% • $110m
• Retail – 22% • $110m
• Mass Retail – 28% • $140m
15
• Imports & Trades – 8% • $40m
• Storage – 15% • $75m
• Transport 6% • $30m
• Bottling Plants 11% • $55m
Total revenues for a 500,000 MT LPG Annual National Usage is almost $500m (at $1000/MT)
Total Value capture potential for a 500,000 MT LPG Annual National Usage is $495m p.a.
NIGERIA LPG - FINANCING THE SECTOR
16
• Different Capital sources have different requirements and are appropriate for a variety of projects
17
• Company Cash Flows (Salaries, LPG gas fills)
• Supplier’s credit (Cylinders, Trucks)
• Working capital loans/Overdraft/Trade Finance/IFF (Stoves, hoses, pipes)
• Domestic long term bank loans (Bullet tanks, bottling equipment)
• Project Financing Arrangements (Storage Terminals, Vessels)
• Development Financing (Cylinders, Stoves, many others)
• Export Credit Agencies (All capital equipment)
• Other non conventional financing options: Technical Partnerships with Financing options
18
• Global – Slow Global economic growth means financiers are looking at emerging market projects in search of alpha (returns)
• Prime lending rate at record lows • Libor rate ranged from 0.25% to 1.5% since the liquidity crisis
– Compared to CBN MPR at 12%
• Foreign commercial funds often require local bank guarantees to finance • Local bank additions can add 5-8% depending on quality of credit • Loan documentation is a keen affair • Some non-conventional models now standard: Technical partnership with
foreign operator who helps to raise financing from his home market
19
• Private Equity (Over $1.5bn in equity pools) – ACA – EAIF – FMO – CDC – AFC – VSA – US Hedge Funds
• Public Equity (IPO etc) – NSE trying to make inroads to downstream oil & gas companies
20
• Sector Issues • Inadequate funding capacity of local financial institutions • Inadequate securities/collateral for loans • Low Credit ratings of Oil companies • Low credibility ratings i.e. High default rate • Poor Credit Management Record • Lack of Project Finance mechanisms
21
• Price Risk – Changes in market prices. Ripple effect from NLNG or Platt’s prices
• Foreign Exchange Risk – – Currency movements – Performance Risk / Credit Risk – e.g., non-performance by counter party
• Operational Risk – Cargo Delays – Demurrage – Off-spec cargo etc
• Market Risk – Competition among rival companies which could change local market
projections
• Monetary Policy Risk (interest rate) – Increase in interest rate and other monetary policy, challenge to borrowing
• Country Risk – Political unrest, changing government policies, etc
22
NIGERIA LPG – HOW FINANCIERS VIEW THE SECTOR
23
• Country - Credit ratings / Issuer Default ratings (IDR) Nigeria BB+ – Socio-political environment – Economic policies / ever-changing government policies – Regulation vs Free market – Balance of Trade
• Multiple layers of taxation and uneven tariffs
24
25
BMI Oil & Gas Outlook 2013
26
• Despite access to cheap domestically produced feedstock across much of the continent, fuels subsidies have left refining margins under pressure and made for a challenging downstream investment climate.
• Nigeria's Downstream Rating - Overview – Nigeria is in the upper half of the league table in BMI's downstream RRRs with a
few high scores. It is ranked fourth, behind Algeria, due largely to poor Country Risk factors that undermine further a regulated and largely state-controlled industry.
• Nigeria Downstream Rating – Rewards – Industry Rewards: On the basis of downstream data alone, Nigeria ranks high in
terms of Industry Rewards, reflecting large refining capacity, strong gas demand growth and retail site density.
– Country Rewards: The population is the highest for the region, while the growth outlook for nominal GDP and GDP per capita both offer positive prospects.
• Nigeria Downstream Rating - Risks – Industry Risks: Nigeria's low Industry Risks rating reflects the unfavorable
regulatory regime and limited progress in terms of privatization of government-held assets.
– Country Risks: Nigeria's broader Country Risks environment is much more attractive. The best score by far is for short-term economic external risk, although short-term economic growth risk also fares well and the score for short-term policy continuity is around the regional average.
27
CONCLUSIONS
28
1 LPG Value chain needs $525-‐$600m in new capital to grow
2 The whole value chain has to grow together for financiers not to concentrate on one part of the chain while ignoring the others. Annual revenue opportunity is approximately $500m per annum, at the most a 1.5 year breakeven proposi)on
3 Appropriate capital must be sought for the investment at hand.
4 Interna)onal firms evaluate sector investments through a prism of industry and country risk
5 Government interven)on seems necessary at this point to bring reforms and equal treatment of compe)ng fuels and in this case different sources of the same fuel
29
30