Financialreportingdevelopments Bb1883 Realestateprojectcosts July2011

8/10/2019 Financialreportingdevelopments Bb1883 Realestateprojectcosts July2011

1/41

Financial reportingdevelopments

A comprehensive guide

Financial reporting

developments

Real estate project

costsRevised July 2011


2/41

Financial reporting developments -Real estate project costs

To our clients and other friends

The guidance for real estate project costs primarily addresses whether costs associated with acquiring,developing, constructing, selling, or renting real estate projects (other than real estate projects

developed for an entitys own use) should be capitalized or charged to expense as incurred. While the

guidance for real estate project costs (formerly Statement 67) was originally issued more than 25 years

ago, determining what costs to capitalize, when to capitalize them and accounting for subsequent

measurement considerations (including impairment considerations and accounting for abandoned

property) continues to be challenging.

We hope this publication will help you understand and successfully apply the guidance for real estate

project costs. Ernst & Young professionals are prepared to assist you in your understanding and are

ready to discuss your particular concerns and questions.

July 2011


3/41


Contents

1

Introduction and scope ............................................................................................... 1.1 General ................................................................................................................................

2 Real estate acquisition, development and construction costs .......................................

2.1 Preacquisition costs ..............................................................................................................

2.1.1 Accounting for internal costs relating to real estate property acquisitions .......................

2.2 Taxes and insurance .............................................................................................................

2.2.1 Accounting for special assessments and tax increment financing entities ........................

2.2.2 Rental costs incurred during a construction period ........................................................ 1

2.2.3 Interest ...................................................................................................................... 1

2.3 Project costs ....................................................................................................................... 1

2.3.1 Accounting for asset retirement obligations, the costs of asbestos

removal, and costs to treat environmental contamination ............................................. 1

2.3.2 Accounting for demolition costs ................................................................................... 1

2.4 Amenities ............................................................................................................................ 1

2.5 Incidental operations ............................................................................................................ 1

2.6 Allocation of capitalized costs to the components of a real estate project ................................ 2

2.7 Revisions of estimates.......................................................................................................... 2

2.8 Abandonments .................................................................................................................... 2

2.9 Donations to municipalities ................................................................................................... 2

2.10 Changes in use .................................................................................................................... 2

3 Costs incurred to sell and rent real estate .................................................................... 2

3.1 Costs incurred to sell real estate projects .............................................................................. 23.2 Costs incurred to rent real estate projects ............................................................................. 2

3.3 Initial rental operations ........................................................................................................ 3

4 Recoverability ......................................................................................................... 3

A Index of ASC references in this publication ................................................................ 3

B Abbreviations used in this publication ....................................................................... 3


4/41

Conte


Notice to readers:

This publication includes excerpts from and references to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification

(the Codification or ASC). The Codification uses a hierarchy that includes Topics, Subtopics, Sections

and Paragraphs. Each Topic includes an Overall Subtopic that generally includes pervasive guidance for

the topic and additional Subtopics, as needed, with incremental or unique guidance. Each Subtopic

includes Sections that in turn include numbered Paragraphs. Thus, a Codification reference includes the

Topic (XXX), Subtopic (YY), Section (ZZ) and Paragraph (PP).

Throughout this publication references to guidance in the codification are shown using these reference

numbers. References are also made to certain pre-codification standards (and specific sections or

paragraphs of pre-Codification standards) in situations in which the content being discussed is excluded

from the Codification.

This publication has been carefully prepared but it necessarily contains information in summary form and

is therefore intended for general guidance only; it is not intended to be a substitute for detailed research

or the exercise of professional judgment. The information presented in this publication should not be

construed as legal, tax, accounting, or any other professional advice or service. Ernst & Young LLP can

accept no responsibility for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result ofany material in this publication. You should consult with Ernst & Young LLP or other professional

advisors familiar with your particular factual situation for advice concerning specific audit, tax or other

matters before making any decisions.

Portions of FASB publications reprinted with permission. Copyright Financial Accounting Standards Board, 401 Merritt 7, P.O.Box 5116, Norwalk, CT 06856-5116, U.S.A. Copies of complete documents are available from the FASB.


5/41

Financial reporting developments Real estate project costs

1 Introduction and scope

The real estate project costs guidance in ASC 970, Real Estate

General, addresses accounting for thecosts of real estate projects, including acquisition, development, construction, selling, and initial rental

(up to the point of normal operations as defined) costs. The general principle in the guidance for real

estate project costs is that if costs are directly associated with a real estate project (i.e., development,

construction, selling, and initial rental), they are capitalized and all other costs are charged to expense a

incurred. The guidance for real estate project costs does not address the accounting for the acquisition

of a business. See the guidance for business combinations (ASC 805, Business Combinations) for furthe

details.

Excerpt from Accounting Standards CodificationReal Estate General Overall

Overview and Background970-10-05-6

The Real Estate Project Costs Subsections establish accounting and reporting standards for

acquisition, development, construction, selling, and rental costs associated with real estate projects.

They also provide guidance for the accounting for initial rental operations and criteria for determining

when the status of a rental project changes from nonoperating to operating.

Scope and Scope Exceptions

970-10-15-7

The guidance in the Real Estate Project Costs Subsections applies to all entities with productive activities

relating to real property, excluding property used primarily in the entitys non-real estate operations.

970-10-15-8

The guidance in the Real Estate Project Costs Subsections does not apply to the following transactions

and activities:

a. Real estate developed by an entity for use in its own operations, other than for sale or rental. In

this context, real estate developed by a member of a consolidated group for use in the operations

of another member of the group (for example, a manufacturing facility developed by a subsidiary

for use in its parents operations) when the property is reported in the groups consolidated

financial statements. However, this does not include property reported in the separate financial

statements of the entity that developed it.

b. Initial direct costs of sales-type, operating, and other types of leases, which are defined in

Topic 840. The accounting for initial direct costs is prescribed in that Topic.

c. Costs directly related to manufacturing, merchandising, or service activities as distinguished from

real estate activities.

970-10-15-9

Paragraphs 970-340-25-16 through 25-17, 970-340-35-2, 970-340-40-2, and 970-605-25-1

through 25-2 do not apply to real estate rental activity in which the predominant rental period is less

than one month.


6/41

1 Introduction and sco


970-10-15-10

Paragraphs 970-340-25-13 through 25-15 and 970-340-40-1 do not apply to real estate time-sharing

transactions. Topic 978 provides guidance on the accounting for those transactions.

The accounting guidance for real estate project costs:

Only applies to real estate developed for sale or rent, not real estate developed by an enterprise for

its own use in its operations (e.g., a factory or warehouse)

Does not apply to real estate developed by one member of a consolidated group for use by another

member of the group when the property is included in the groups consolidated financial statements

Does not apply to the costs associated with acquiring an operating property (see Section 2.1.1 for

further detail)

Does not apply to capitalized rental costs for real estate that is rented for less than one month at a

time such as a hotel or parking garage that is rented on a daily or weekly basis (see Section 3.2)

Does not apply to selling costs (see Section 3.1) related to time-sharing transactions (see ASC 978

for further details)

1.1 General

Excerpt from Accounting Standards CodificationReal Estate General Overall

Scope and Scope Exceptions

970-10-15-11

This Subsection specifies the accounting for the following as they relate to real estate projects:

a. Preacquisition costs

b. Taxes and insurance

c. Project costs

d. Amenities

e. Incidental operations

f. Allocation of capitalized costs to components of a real estate project

g. Revisions of estimates

h. Abandonments and changes in use

i. Selling costs

j. Rental costs

k. Reductions in the carrying amounts of real estate assets prescribed by the Impairment or Disposa

of Long-Lived Assets Subsections of Subtopic 360-10.

Refer to Sections 2.1 4.1 for detailed guidance on the accounting for real estate project costs.


7/41

Financial reporting developments Real estate project costs

2 Real estate acquisition, development and

construction costs

In general, costs (both direct and indirect) specifically associated with a real estate project that is under

development should be capitalized. All other costs should be charged to expense as incurred.

2.1 Preacquisition costs

Excerpt from Accounting Standards CodificationPreacquisition Costs

Costs related to a property that are incurred for the express purpose of, but prior to, obtaining that

property. Examples of preacquisition costs may be costs of surveying, zoning or traffic studies, or

payments to obtain an option on the property.

Real Estate General Other Assets and Deferred Costs

Recognition

970-340-25-3

Payments to obtain an option to acquire real property shall be capitalized as incurred. All other costs

related to a property that are incurred before the entity acquires the property, or before the entity

obtains an option to acquire it, shall be capitalized if all of the following conditions are met and

otherwise shall be charged to expense as incurred:

a. The costs are directly identifiable with the specific property.

b. The costs would be capitalized if the property were already acquired.

c. Acquisition of the property or of an option to acquire the property is probable (that is, likely to

occur). This condition requires that the prospective purchaser is actively seeking to acquire the

property and has the ability to finance or obtain financing for the acquisition and that there is no

indication that the property is not available for sale.

970-340-25-4

Capitalized preacquisition costs either:

a. Shall be included as project costs upon the acquisition of the property

b. To the extent not recoverable by the sale of the options, plans, and so forth, shall be charged to

expense when it is probable that the property will not be acquired.

Preacquisition costs are defined as costs related to a property that are incurred for the express purpose

of, but prior to, obtaining the property.Examples of preacquisition costs include costs incurred to obtain

an option to acquire real estate and other costs incurred prior to obtaining the property, such as: zoning

costs, environmental or feasibility studies, legal fees, finders fees, appraisals, and project planning costs.

Costs incurred to obtain an option to acquire real estate, either from the property owner or the holder of a

option, should be capitalized. All costs directly identifiable with a specific property that are incurred before

an entity acquires the property, or before the entity obtains an option to acquire the property, should be


8/41

2 Real estate acquisition, development, and construction co


capitalized if acquisition of the property, or an option to acquire the property, is probable and the costs

would be capitalized if the property were already acquired. The specific property identified should be

available for sale and the prospective purchaser must be actively seeking to acquire the property and

have the ability to finance or obtain financing for the acquisition. All other costs, including general and

administrative costs incurred during the preacquisition phase, should be charged to expense as incurred.

Illustration 2-1: Capitalized costs not directly identifiable with a specific property

Facts:

Company A is committed to constructing an office building to be leased to third parties in Boston.

Management is currently evaluating three potential sites and believes it is probable that one of these

sites will be acquired. However, no one site is more likely to be acquired than any of the others.

Company A has incurred $50,000 in costs to establish local real estate contacts and research zoning

and building codes.

Analysis:

Although Company A believes it is probable that one of the three potential sites will be acquired,

because it is not probable that any one site will be acquired, the costs incurred are not directlyidentifiable with a specific property that is probable of being acquired. Therefore, the $50,000 in costs

incurred to establish local real estate contracts and research zoning and building codes should be

charged to expense as incurred.

In determining whether the acquisition of a property or an option to acquire the property is probable,

companies should look to the definition of probableused in ASC 450-20, Contingencies Loss

Contingencies. As long as it is probable that an entity will acquire a specific property or an option to

acquire that property, preacquisition costs should be capitalized and the asset should be evaluated for

recoverability using the guidance for the impairment of long-lived assets (ASC 360-10) , whenever

events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable.

If an entity determines that acquisition of a property is no longer probable, no new costs should becapitalized. Additionally, the fact that it is no longer probable that the property will be acquired may be

an indicator of impairment requiring costs previously capitalized to be evaluated for recoverability in

accordance with the provisions of ASC 360-10. If it becomes probable that a property will not be

acquired, all capitalized costs should be written off to the extent the costs are not recoverable through

sale (i.e., sale of an option, plans, etc.).

The following table summarizes these concepts:

Likelihood of acquisition

Capitalize new qualified

preacquisition costs?

Treatment of previously

capitalized costs

Acquisition of property or option

is probable

Yes Evaluate for recoverability in accordance with the

guidance for the impairment of long-lived assets

(ASC 360-10) if impairment indicator exists

Acquisition of property or option

is reasonably possible

No Evaluate for recoverability in accordance with the

guidance for the impairment of long-lived assets

(ASC 360-10) if impairment indicator exists

Probable that property will not

be acquired

No Write-off all costs unless recoverable through

direct sale


9/41



Illustration 2-2: Evaluation of capitalized costs

Facts:

Company A is committed to constructing an office building in Chicago at a specified site. Company A

has an option to acquire the site and has capitalized $50,000 in preacquisition costs to date. Company

A has not made any noticeable progress toward acquiring the property or development approval in

several months and no longer believes that it is probable that the property will be acquired but stillbelieves it is reasonably possible that the property will be acquired.

Analysis:

No new preacquisition costs should be capitalized because Company A has concluded that it is no

longer probable that the property will be acquired. Additionally, the $50,000 in costs previously

capitalized should be evaluated for recoverability in accordance with the guidance for the impairment

of long-lived assets (ASC 360-10). If Company A subsequently determines it is probable that the

property will not be acquired, all capitalized costs not recoverable through a direct sale should be

charged to expense.

2.1.1 Accounting for internal costs relating to real estate property acquisitions

Excerpt from Accounting Standards CodificationReal Estate General Other Assets and Deferred Costs

Recognition

970-340-25-5

The view that all internal costs of identifying and acquiring commercial properties should be deferred

and, in some manner, capitalized as part of the cost of successful property acquisitions is not

appropriate.

970-340-25-6

Internal costs of preacquisition activities incurred in connection with the acquisition of a property that

will be classified as nonoperating at the date of acquisition that are directly identifiable with theacquired property and that were incurred subsequent to the time that acquisition of that specific

property was considered probable (that is, likely to occur) shall be capitalized as part of the cost of

that acquisition.

970-340-25-7

Paragraph970-340-25-17 is also applicable in situations in which the acquired property is partially

operating and partially nonoperating.

Subsequent Measurement

970-340-35-3

If an entity subsequently determines that a property will be classified as operating at the date of

acquisition, the internal costs of preacquisition activities shall be charged to expense and any

additional costs shall be expensed as incurred.

970-340-35-4

If an entity subsequently determines that a property will be classified as nonoperating at the date of

acquisition, previously expensed internal costs of preacquisition activities shall not be capitalized as

part of the cost of that acquisition.
http://gaait-aa.ey.net/Document.aspx?PersistentBookId=0&GotoString=d3e29536-110302__d3e29555-110302&ProductId=111#d3e29536-110302__d3e29555-110302http://gaait-aa.ey.net/Document.aspx?PersistentBookId=0&GotoString=d3e29536-110302__d3e29555-110302&ProductId=111#d3e29536-110302__d3e29555-110302


10/41



Real Estate General Other Expenses

Recognition

970-720-25-1

Internal costs of preacquisition activities incurred in connection with the acquisition of a property that

will be classified as operating at the date of acquisition shall be expensed as incurred.

970-720-25-2

A property would be considered operating if, at the date of acquisition, major construction activity (as

distinguished from activities such as routine maintenance and cleanup) is substantially completed on

the property and either of the following conditions exists:

a. It is held available for occupancy upon completion of tenant improvements by the acquirer.

b. It is already income-producing.

Many companies have internal real estate acquisition departments. The employees in these department

spend their time searching for and managing the acquisition of real estate properties. An entity should

capitalize internal costs of preacquisition activities if the costs are directly identifiable with a specificnonoperating property, and they were incurred subsequent to the time the acquisition of that specific

nonoperating property was considered probable. Such costs should only be capitalized if the property w

be classified as nonoperating at the date of acquisition. If the property will be classified as operating at

the date of acquisition, internal preacquisition costs should be charged to expense as incurred.

A property should be considered operating if major construction activity (versus activities such as routin

maintenance and cleanup) is substantially completed on the property and (a) it is held available for

occupancy on completion of tenant improvements by the acquirer or (b) it is already income producing.

For example, an entity planning to purchase an apartment building that is currently occupied by tenants

should not capitalize the internal costs associated with the acquisition of that property, even if the costs

are directly identifiable with the property and acquisition of the property is probable. If instead the entit

was planning to build an apartment building on a specific piece of land and the acquisition of that land isconsidered probable, internal costs directly associated with acquiring the land should be capitalized.

If an entity initially determines a property will be classified as nonoperating but subsequently determine

that the property will be classified as operating at the date of acquisition, previously capitalized costs

should be charged to expense and any additional costs should be charged to expense as incurred.

However, if an entity initially determines a property will be classified as operating but subsequently

determines that the property will be classified as nonoperating at the date of acquisition, the entity

should not capitalize amounts previously charged to expense. The guidance for real estate project costs

does not address the accounting for the acquisition of a business (see ASC 805 for further details).

Consistent with ASC 970-340-25-17 (see Section 3.3), if portions of a rental project are substantially

completed and occupied by tenants or held available for occupancy and other portions have not yetreached that stage, each portion of the project should be accounted for as a separate project. Costs

should be allocated between the portions under construction (nonoperating) and the portions

substantially completed and held available for occupancy (operating), and the costs allocated to the

nonoperating portions should be capitalized if they are directly identifiable with the property and were

incurred subsequent to the time the acquisition of the property was considered probable, and those

related to the operating portion should be charged to expense.


11/41



Illustration 2-3: Potential sites are all nonoperating properties

Facts:

Company A is committed to constructing an office building in Boston that will be leased to third parties

(i.e., the building will not be for internal use). Company A has an internal real estate acquisition

department that incurs $50,000 in costs while evaluating three potential sites for the building. Onceone of the three sites is selected and is deemed probable of being acquired, the internal real estate

acquisition department incurs an additional $10,000 in costs directly associated with acquiring the

selected property.

Analysis:

Because the property being acquired is a nonoperating property (Company A is planning to construct

an office building on the land acquired), Company A should capitalize the $10,000 in costs that were

incurred after it was probable that the property would be acquired. The $50,000 in costs incurred

before the acquisition of a specific property was probable (i.e., while evaluating three potential sites)

should be charged to expense as incurred.

Illustration 2-4: Potential sites are at various stages of completion

Facts:

Company A is committed to owning an office building in Boston that will be leased to third parties

(i.e., the building will not be for internal use). Company A has an internal real estate acquisition

department that incurs $50,000 in costs while evaluating three potential properties. Property A is

under construction; Property B has been recently completed and is available for occupancy; Property

C is 75-percent occupied. Once one of the three sites is selected and deemed probable of being

acquired, the internal real estate acquisition department incurs an additional $10,000 in costs directly

associated with acquiring the selected property.

Analysis:

The $50,000 in costs incurred before the acquisition of a specific property was probable should be

charged to expense as incurred. Additionally, Company A should only capitalize the additional

$10,000 in costs directly associated with acquiring the selected property if the property that is under

construction (Property A) is selected. The other two properties (Properties B and C) would be

considered operating properties and, as such, no preaquisition costs should be capitalized.

2.2 Taxes and insurance

Excerpt from Accounting Standards CodificationReal Estate General Other Assets and Deferred Costs

Recognition

970-340-25-8

Costs incurred on real estate for property taxes and insurance shall be capitalized as property cost

only during periods in which activities necessary to get the property ready for its intended use are in

progress. The phrase activities necessary to get the property ready for its intended use are in progress

is used here with the same meaning as it has for interest capitalization in paragraphs 835-20-25-3

through 25-4 and 835-20-25-8. Costs incurred for such items after the property is substantially

complete and ready for its intended use shall be charged to expense as incurred. The phrase

substantially complete and ready for its intended useis used here with the same meaning as it has for

interest capitalization in paragraph 835-20-25-5.


12/41



Costs incurred for property taxes and insurance on real estate should be accounted for in a manner that

is similar to interest costs, which are addressed in ASC 835-20, Interest Capitalization of Interest(see

Section 2.2.3), in that the period of capitalization is the same. Property taxes and insurance costs shou

only be capitalized during periods in which activities necessary to get a property ready for its intended

use are in progress. ASC 835-20-20 indicates that the term activitiesis to be construed broadly

and encompasses more than just physical construction. For example, preconstruction activities, such

as developing plans or obtaining permits, and activities undertaken to overcome unforeseen obstacles,

such as technical problems, labor disputes, or litigation, would all qualify as activities necessary to get

the property ready for its intended use. If an entity suspends substantially all activities related to the

project, tax and insurance cost capitalization should cease until activities are resumed. However, an

entity is not required to suspend cost capitalization for brief interruptions, interruptions that are

externally imposed, or delays that are inherent in the development process. Taxes and insurance

should not be capitalized if the owner is simply holding the property for future development, but has

not commenced development activities.

Once the property is substantially complete and ready for its intended use, tax and insurance costs

should be charged to expense as incurred. The point at which an asset is substantially complete and

ready for its intended use depends on the nature of the asset (ASC 835-20-25-5). Some assets are

completed in stages and the completed stages can be used while work is continuing on the other stages

(e.g., individual condominium units or individual floors in an office building). Other assets must be

completed in their entirety before any part of the asset can be used (e.g., a warehouse that will be lease

to one tenant). If some portions of an asset are substantially complete and ready for use and other

portions have not yet reached that stage, the substantially completed portions should be accounted for

as a separate project and capitalization of tax and insurance costs on that portion of the project should

cease. A project held for occupancy (rental property) is substantially complete and held available for

occupancy upon the completion of tenant improvements by the developer but no later than one year

from cessation of major construction activity (as distinguished from activities such as routine

maintenance and cleanup). See Section 3.3 for additional details.

2.2.1 Accounting for special assessments and tax increment financing entitiesExcerpt from Accounting Standards CodificationReal Estate General Debt

Overview and Background

970-470-05-2

Municipalities often levy special assessments to finance the construction of certain infrastructure

assets or improvements or may levy special assessments for other specified purposes. Alternatively,

an entity that intends to develop real estate it owns or leases may form a tax increment financing

entity to finance and operate the project infrastructure. Tax increment financing entities are

authorized under various state statutes to issue bonds to finance the construction of road, water, and

other utility infrastructure for a specific project. Usually, all of the debt is issued by the tax increment

financing entity and will be repaid by future user fees or taxes assessed to cover operating costs, such

as repairs and maintenance, as well as debt service.

970-470-05-3

The Variable Interest Entities Subsections of Subtopic 810-10address consolidation by business

entities of variable interest entities (VIEs), which may include many special-purpose entities of the type

used as tax increment financing entities.


13/41



Recognition

970-470-25-1

If the special assessment or the assessment to be levied by the tax increment financing entity on each

individual property owner is a fixed or determinable amount for a fixed or determinable period, there i

a presumption that an obligation shall be recognized by the property owner. Further, with respect to

tax increment financing entities, factors such as the following indicate that an entity may becontingently liable for tax increment financing entity debt, and recognition of an obligation shall be

evaluated under Topic 450:

a. The entity must satisfy any shortfall in annual debt service obligations.

b. There is a pledge of entity assets.

c. The entity provides a letter of credit in support of some or all of the tax increment financing entitydebt or provides other credit enhancements.

970-470-25-2

If the entity is constructing facilities for its own use or operation, the presence of any of the factors in

the preceding paragraph creates a presumption that the tax increment financing entity debt must be

recognized as an obligation of the entity.

970-470-25-3

An entitys agreement to either make up shortfalls in the annual debt service requirements or

guarantee the tax increment financing entitys debt, as described in Example 1, Cases C through D (se

paragraphs 970-470-55-9 through 55-14), may be guarantees under the characteristics found in

paragraph 460-10-15-4 and subject to the initial recognition, initial measurement, and disclosure

requirements of Topic460.

970-470-25-4

See Section970-470-55 for examples of accounting for special assessments and tax increment

financing entities.

970-470-25-5

See Section974-605-25 for adjustment of assets (or liabilities) transferred between a real estate

investment trust and its adviser.

Infrastructure assets or improvements, such as roads, water lines, and other utilities, are often financed

through special tax assessments. A municipality may levy a special assessment to finance the

infrastructure or a real estate developer may form a Tax Increment Financing Entity (TIFE) that is

authorized to issue bonds to finance and operate the project infrastructure. When a TIFE issues bonds,

the debt is generally repaid by future user fees or taxes assessed on the property to cover operating

costs, such as repairs and maintenance, and debt service (i.e., the property owner is responsible forrepaying the debt and the repayment obligation remains attached to the property if it is sold).

ASC 970-470, Real Estate General Debt, addresses whether companies should recognize a liability

for special assessments from municipalities or for TIFE debt. Under this guidance, there is a presumptio

that an obligation should be recognized if the assessment to be levied by the municipality or TIFE on eac

individual property owner is fixed or determinable (i.e., a fixed or determinable amount for a fixed or

determinable period).
http://gaait-aa.ey.net/Document.aspx?PersistentBookId=0&GotoString=ASC%20460&ProductId=111#ASC%20460http://gaait-aa.ey.net/Document.aspx?PersistentBookId=0&GotoString=ASC%20970-470-55&ProductId=111#ASC%20970-470-55http://gaait-aa.ey.net/Document.aspx?PersistentBookId=0&GotoString=ASC%20974-605-25&ProductId=111#ASC%20974-605-25http://gaait-aa.ey.net/Document.aspx?PersistentBookId=0&GotoString=ASC%20974-605-25&ProductId=111#ASC%20974-605-25http://gaait-aa.ey.net/Document.aspx?PersistentBookId=0&GotoString=ASC%20970-470-55&ProductId=111#ASC%20970-470-55http://gaait-aa.ey.net/Document.aspx?PersistentBookId=0&GotoString=ASC%20460&ProductId=111#ASC%20460


14/41



Even if the assessment to be levied by a TIFE on each individual property owner is not fixed or

determinable, factors such as the following are indicators that an entity may be contingently liable for TIFE

debt, and recognition of an obligation should be evaluated using the guidance in ASC 450, Contingencies:

The entity must satisfy any shortfall in annual debt service obligations

There is a pledge of company assets

The entity provides a letter of credit in support of some or all of the TIFE debt or provides other

credit enhancements

If an entity is constructing facilities for its own use or operation (this would include rental or sale), the

presence of any of the above factors creates a presumption that the TIFE debt should be recognized as

an obligation of the entity.

The following examples are included in the accounting guidance for special assessments and tax incremen

financing entities (ASC 970-470) and demonstrate the application of this guidance to specific situations:

Excerpt from Accounting Standards Codification

Real Estate

General

DebtImplementation Guidance and Illustrations

970-470-55-2

Cases A, B, C, and D share the following assumptions:

a. The entity owns 100 percent of the land under development.

b. $10 million of bonds are issued for construction of the development infrastructure.

c. The interest rate on the bonds is 6 percent and the term is 20 years.

d. The annual debt service requirement is $500,000 principal repayment plus interest accrued

during the year.

e. The project is expected to take 10 years to complete, and no significant sales of property areexpected until the third year. All of the property under development is intended for sale.

f. The property under development is subject to lien if there is a default on the assessment.

Case A: Municipality Bond Issue; Entity Obligation Recognized for Special Assessment

970-470-55-3

A municipality issues bonds to finance construction of the infrastructure assets. The municipality

levies a special assessment on the property that is equal to the face amount of the bonds. The special

assessment bears interest at the same rate as the bonds. In this Case, if there are 100 equal-sized

parcels in the development, each parcel will be assessed $5,000 per year plus accrued interest for20 years. The assessment remains with the property. Accordingly, upon sale or partial sale of the

development, the entity must pay the remaining assessment on the property sold or the purchaser

must assume the obligation.

970-470-55-4

The entity must recognize an obligation for the special assessment because the amount is fixed for a

fixed period of time. Subsequent property owners that assume the obligation must recognize the

obligation related to the parcels purchased.


15/41



Case B: Tax Increment Financing Entity; Entity Obligation Recognized for Debt

970-470-55-5

A tax increment financing entity is formed to issue bonds. On completion of construction of the

infrastructure assets, title to such assets (including any land upon which the infrastructure is

constructed) passes from the tax increment financing entity to the municipality. The entity does not

guarantee the tax increment financing entity debt.

970-470-55-6

Property owners will be subject to a tax on an equal basis determined by the number of lots in the

district. The tax will be levied annually, based on the tax increment financing entity s debt service

requirement for that year. Accordingly, if there are 100 parcels in the development, $5,000 plus

interest accrued for the year is expected to be levied on each parcel annually for the 20 years the

debt is outstanding. Additional assessments may be levied by the tax increment financing entity

for maintenance or other services. These assessments are in addition to normal property

tax assessments.

970-470-55-7

Upon sale of a portion of the property, either the entity must repay a pro rata portion of the tax

increment financing entity debt or the purchaser must assume the obligation.

970-470-55-8

The entity must recognize an obligation for the tax increment financing entity debt because the

assessment in this example is a determinable amount for a determinable period of time.

Case C: Tax Increment Financing Entity; No Entity Obligation Recognized

970-470-55-9





970-470-55-10

The rates for annual assessments are determined prior to issuance of the debt and are limited to a

maximum annual tax rate based on anticipated debt service requirements. The rate levied is

dependent on the land use category of each parcel of property in the district. Developed property is

taxed at the maximum rate, unless a lesser amount is needed to meet current year debt service and

maintenance obligations. If the amount levied for developed property is not sufficient, undeveloped

property is subject to tax up to the maximum rate. If the maximum rate applied to both developed and

undeveloped property is insufficient, additional taxes may be assessed only if approved by eligible

voters.

970-470-55-11

Because the assessment on each individual property owner is dependent upon the rate of developmen

and, therefore, is not fixed or determinable, an obligation is not required to be recognized. However, if

the entity must satisfy any shortfall in annual debt service requirements, recognition of an obligation

must be evaluated pursuant to Subtopic 450-20.


16/41



Case D: Tax Increment Financing Entity; No Entity Obligation Recognized

970-470-55-12





970-470-55-13

The debt service requirements of the tax increment financing entity will be met by normal property tax

assessments. The increased value of the developed property is expected to generate sufficient taxes

to meet the debt service and other obligations. If such assessments are not sufficient, the municipality

must satisfy the shortfall.

970-470-55-14

The assessment on each individual property is not determinable because it is based on the current tax

rate and the assessed value of the property. Accordingly, the entity is not required to recognize an

obligation. The assessments will be treated as property taxes. If, however, the company had

guaranteed the tax increment financing entity debt or must satisfy any shortfall in annual debt servicerequirements, the recognition of an obligation would be evaluated pursuant to Subtopic 450-20.

The potential effects of guarantees (such as an entity s agreement to make up shortfalls in the annual

debt service requirements or guarantee the tax increment financing entitys debt) and consolidation

considerations for special-purpose entities of the type used as tax increment financing entities should

also be considered. See the guidance for guarantees and special-purpose entities in ASC 460,

Guarantees, and the Variable Interest Subsections of ASC 810, Consolidations, for more details.

ASC 970-470 only addresses when a liability should be recorded for a special assessment or TIFE debt

and not whether an asset or expense should be recognized when the liability is recorded. Generally, onc

construction of the infrastructure assets is complete, title to the assets (including any land on which the

infrastructure is constructed) passes from the TIFE to the municipality. Although the developer does no

retain title to the assets, we believe the costs associated with a special assessment or TIFE debt relate t

the overall development of the real estate project and should be capitalized as project costs. This

treatment is consistent with the treatment of real estate donated to municipalities for use that will

benefit the project which is allocated as a common cost of the project (ASC 970-360-35-1, see Section

2.9 for further discussion).

When an entity has recorded a liability in accordance with ASC 970-470 and the property to which the

obligation is attached is sold, the extinguished liability and capitalized costs should be included in the pro

or loss calculation. If a transaction does not qualify for sales treatment, the obligation and capitalized

costs should remain on the sellers balance sheet (refer to our Financial Reporting Developments booklet

Real Estate Salesfor additional guidance on accounting for the sale of real estate).

2.2.2 Rental costs incurred during a construction period

In some lease arrangements, a lessee may have the right to use leased property prior to commencing

operations or making rental payments in order to construct a lessee asset (e.g., leasehold

improvements). The accounting guidance for leases (ASC 840-20-25-10 through 25-11) prohibits an en

user lessee from capitalizing rent under an operating lease into the cost of a constructed asset (refer to

our Financial Reporting Developments booklet, Lease Accounting A Summary, for additional

information). However, the accounting guidance for leases does not address whether a lessee that

accounts for the sale or rental of real estate projects under the applicable guidance in ASC 970 should


17/41



capitalize rental costs associated with ground and building operating leases. Therefore, we believe that

whether a lessee accounting for the sale or rental of real estate projects in accordance with ASC 970

capitalizes or expenses rental costs associated with ground and building operating leases is a policy

election that should be disclosed and consistently applied. If capitalized, the period of capitalization and

related accounting should follow ASC 970-340-25-8 (see Section 2.2 for further details).

2.2.3 Interest

ASC 835-20, Interest Capitalization of Interest, establishes standards of financial accounting and

reporting for capitalizing interest cost as a part of the historical cost of acquiring certain assets. Assets

that qualify for capitalization of interest include: assets that are constructed or otherwise produced for

an enterprises own use; assets intended for sale or lease that are constructed or otherwise produced as

discrete projects (e.g., real estate projects subject to the applicable guidance in ASC 970); and

investments (e.g., equity, loans, and advances) accounted for by the equity method if the investee has

activities in progress necessary to commence its planned principal operations provided that the

investees activities include the use of funds to acquire qualifying assets (refer to ASC 835-20).

As discussed in Section 2.2, interest costs and costs incurred for property taxes and insurance on real

estate should be accounted for in a similar manner. Interest should only be capitalized during periods inwhich activities necessary to get the property ready for its intended use are in progress (or in the case o

an equity method investment, until the planned principal operations of the investee begin). If an entity

suspends substantially all activities related to the project, cost capitalization should cease until activities

are resumed. However, an entity is not required to suspend cost capitalization for brief interruptions,

interruptions that are externally imposed, or delays that are inherent in the development process.

2.3 Project costs

Excerpt from Accounting Standards CodificationProject Costs

Costs clearly associated with the acquisition, development, and construction of a real estate project.

Indirect Project Costs

Costs incurred after the acquisition of the property, such as construction administration (for example,

the costs associated with a field office at a project site and the administrative personnel that staff the

office), legal fees, and various office costs, that clearly relate to projects under development or

construction. Examples of office costs that may be considered indirect project costs are cost

accounting, design, and other departments providing services that are clearly related to real estate

projects.

Real Estate General Property, Plant, and Equipment

Recognition

970-360-25-2

Project costs clearly associated with the acquisition, development, and construction of a real estate

project shall be capitalized as a cost of that project.

970-360-25-3

Indirect project costs that relate to several projects shall be capitalized and allocated to the projects to

which the costs relate.


18/41



Real Estate General Other Expenses

Recognition

970-720-25-3

Indirect costs that do not clearly relate to projects under development or construction, including

general and administrative expenses, shall be charged to expense as incurred.

Costs that are clearly associated with the acquisition, development, and construction of a real estate

project should be capitalized as project costs. Direct project costs include costs such as the cost of land

acquisition, building materials, or project plans. Indirect project costs should be capitalized if they clearl

relate to the specific real estate project or several different projects (all of which qualify for

capitalization) under development. Indirect project costs that are clearly related to the real estate proje

or projects may include construction administration costs (e.g., costs associated with a field office at a

project site), legal fees, and various other costs (e.g., cost accounting and design). If indirect project

costs are associated with several projects under development, the costs should be allocated to the

projects on a consistent and rational basis. Indirect costs that do not clearly relate to the acquisition,

development, or construction of a real estate project, including most general and administrative costs,

should be charged to expense as incurred.

It may often be difficult to distinguish between indirect project costs that should be capitalized and

general and administrative costs that should be charged to expense. This is further complicated by the

fact that one entity may include appropriately capitalizable costs in a separate development departmen

while another entity may not. In general, we believe there is a presumption that shared costs should not

be capitalized unless they are incremental to development (i.e., the costs would not have been incurred

in the absence of the project or projects under development).

2.3.1 Accounting for asset retirement obligations, the costs of asbestos removal,

and costs to treat environmental contamination

An entity may incur costs to remove, contain, neutralize, or prevent existing or future environmental

contamination of a property. These costs may be incurred voluntarily or may be required by law.Additionally, various federal, state, and local laws require the removal or containment of dangerous

asbestosin buildings and regulate the manner in which the asbestos should be removed or contained.

ASC 410-20,Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligations Asset Retirement Obligations, applies t

legal obligations associated with the retirement of a tangible long-lived asset that result from the

acquisition, construction, development, and (or) the normal operation of a long-lived asset. In ASC 410-

20, a legal obligation is an obligation a party is required to settle as a result of an existing or enacted law

statute, ordinance, written or oral contract, or a promise and an expectation of performance (i.e., unde

the doctrine of promissory estoppel.)

For asset retirement obligations accounted for in accordance with ASC 410-20, the fair value of the liabilit

for asset retirement obligations is recognized in the period in which it is incurred, or in the period in which

a property with an existing retirement obligation is acquired, provided that a reasonable estimate of fairvalue can be made. Upon initial recognition, the costs are capitalized as part of the carrying amount of

the related long-lived asset. For example, an asset retirement obligation may result from construction

(e.g., construction of an asset creates the obligation to dismantle and remove the asset at some point in th

future), in which case the obligation would be recognized as the asset is constructed. In another example,

the asset retirement obligation could result from a new law (e.g., a new law that requires the replacement

of all the pipes in an office building at some point in the future), in which case the obligation would be

recognized at the time that the new law is enacted. Refer to our Financial Reporting Developments bookle

Asset Retirement Obligations, for detailed guidance on the accounting for asset retirement obligations.


19/41



An environmental remediation liability that results from the normal operation of a long-lived asset and

that is associated with the retirement of that asset is within the scope of ASC 410-20. However, an

environmental remediation liability that results from other than the normal operation of a long-lived

asset should fall within the scope of ASC 410-30,Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligations

Environmental Obligations. For example, environmental remediation liabilities that relate to pollution

arising from some past act (e.g., a Superfund violation) that will be corrected without regard to

retirement activities are subject to the provisions of ASC 410-30.Similarly, for the costs of asbestos

removal that result from the other-than-normal operation of an asset are not within the scope of ASC

410-20 but may be subject to the provisions of ASC 410-30 (e.g., if the company has an obligation to

remove the asbestos). Refer to our Financial Reporting Developments booklet, Environmental

Obligations,for more details.

The guidance for environmental obligations may also apply to costs incurred to remove asbestos or trea

environmental contamination that do not relate to a legal obligation, such as costs to voluntarily improv

the safety of an asset (e.g., voluntarily removing asbestos in a foreign jurisdiction where no laws exist to

obligate its removal or voluntarily removing the lead pipes in a building and replacing them with copper

pipes to improve the safety of the buildings water system) or costs to prepare the property for sale.

However, as demonstrated by two of the illustrative examples in ASC 410-20-55, asbestos removal will

generally fall within the guidance for asset retirement obligations. In the unusual event that asbestosremoval costs are not accounted for using the guidance for asset retirement obligations (ASC 410-20), the

guidance for environmental obligations (ASC 410-30) would apply and the costs of asbestos removal may b

capitalized and/or deferred in the following situations:

If costs are incurred within a reasonable time period after a property with a known asbestos problem

is acquired, the costs should be capitalized as part of the cost of the acquired property, subject to a

impairment test (i.e., the guidance for the impairment of long-lived assets in ASC 360-10) for that

property.

If costs are incurred to treat asbestos in an existing property, the costs may be capitalized as a

betterment, subject to an impairment test for that property.

If costs are incurred in anticipation of a sale of property, they should be deferred and recognized in

the period of sale to the extent those costs are recoverable based on the estimated sales price.

In general, other costs incurred to treat environmental contamination (not within the scope of ASC 410-20

should be charged to expense as incurred in accordance with the guidance for environmental obligation

(ASC 410-30). Those costs may be capitalized if recoverable but only if any one of the following criteria

is met:

The costs extend the life, increase the capacity, or improve the safety or efficiency of property

owned by the entity. The condition of the property after the costs are incurred must have improved

as compared with the condition of the property when originally constructed or acquired, if later. For

example, costs incurred to remove lead pipes in an office building and replace them with copper

pipes to improve the safety of the buildings water system compared with its condition when thewater system was originally acquired may be capitalized if the costs are recoverable.

The costs mitigate or prevent environmental contamination that has yet to occur and that otherwise

may result from future operations or activities. Additionally, the costs improve the property compare

with its condition when constructed or acquired, if later. For example, the costs of installing water

filters in a well to prevent future contamination may be capitalized if the costs are recoverable.

The costs are incurred in preparing property for sale that is currently held for sale.


20/41



2.3.2 Accounting for demolition costs

An entity may purchase property with the intention of demolishing the existing structure and replacing

with a new structure or with the intention of reconstructing the interior of the building (e.g., gutting the

interior of a warehouse in preparation for reconstructing the interior as office space). Alternatively, an

entity may purchase property with the intention of operating the property, but later decide to demolish

and replace the property with a new structure. When there is a change in the use of real estate(e.g., when a golf course is converted to an office building complex), the guidance for real estate project

costs (ASC 970-360-35-2) indicates that the previously capitalized development and construction costs

need not be written off if certain conditions are met (see Section 2.10). However, the guidance for real

estate project costs does not address demolition costs or the accounting for previously capitalized

development and construction costs when there is no change in use (i.e., a 20-year old hotel is

demolished and replaced with a new hotel).

Demolition costs incurred in conjunction with the acquisition of real estate may be capitalized as part of

the cost of the acquisition if the demolition (a) is contemplated as part of the acquisition and (b) occurs

within a reasonable period of time after the acquisition, or is delayed, but the delay is beyond the entity

control (e.g., demolition cannot commence until the end of an existing tenant s lease term, which will

expire shortly after acquisition or demolition is subject to governmental permitting processes). If anentity purchases property with the intention of demolishing the existing structure and replacing it with a

new structure, the entire purchase price and the costs of demolition should be allocated to the cost of

the land.

Illustration 2-5: Demolition costs

Facts:

Company A acquires land with a preexisting structure from Company B. Due to the nature and age of

the structure on the site, the land is worth more without the structure than with the structure. Soon

after the acquisition, Company A, as contemplated at the time of purchase, incurs costs to demolish

the structure.

Analysis:

It is appropriate for Company A to capitalize the costs to demolish the structure as incremental costs

of the acquired land.

If an entity purchases a property with the intention of demolishing and rebuilding the interior of the

building only, the purchase price and costs of demolition should be allocated between the land and

building with the demolition component assigned solely to the building.

If a demolition was not contemplated as part of an acquisition of real estate or the demolition does not

occur within a reasonable period of time after the acquisition, the costs of the demolition should be

charged to expense as incurred, unless the demolition is accounted for as an asset retirement obligation(ARO) in accordance with ASC 410-20.


21/41



2.4 Amenities

Excerpt from Accounting Standards CodificationAmenities

Features that enhance the attractiveness or perceived value of a time-sharing interval. Examples of

amenities include golf courses, utility plants, clubhouses, swimming pools, tennis courts, indoor

recreational facilities, and parking facilities. See also Planned Amenities and Promised Amenities.

Common Costs

Costs that relate to two or more units or phases within a real estate or time-sharing project.


Recognition

970-340-25-9

Accounting for costs of amenities shall be based on managements plans for the amenities in

accordance with the following:

a. If an amenity is to be sold or transferred in connection with the sale of individual units, costs inexcess of anticipated proceeds shall be allocated as common costsbecause the amenity is clearly

associated with the development and sale of the project. The common costs include expected

future operating costs to be borne by the developer until they are assumed by buyers of units in a

project.

b. If an amenity is to be sold separately or retained by the developer, capitalizable costs of theamenity in excess of its estimated fair value as of the expected date of its substantial physical

completion shall be allocated as common costs. For the purpose of determining the amount to be

capitalized as common costs, the amount of cost previously allocated to the amenity shall not be

revised after the amenity is substantially completed and available for use. A later sale of the

amenity at more or less than its estimated fair value as of the date of substantial physical

completion, less any accumulated depreciation, results in a gain or loss that shall be included in

net income in the period in which the sale occurs.

970-340-25-10

Costs of amenities shall be allocated among land parcels benefited and for which development is

probable. A land parcel may be considered to be an individual lot or unit, an amenity, or a phase. The

fair value of a parcel is affected by its physical characteristics, its highest and best use, and the time

and cost required for the buyer to make such use of the property considering access, development

plans, zoning restrictions, and market absorption factors.

970-340-25-11

Before an amenity is substantially completed and available for use, operating income (or loss) of the

amenity shall be included as a reduction of (or an addition to) common costs. When an amenity to be

sold separately or retained by the developer is substantially completed and available for use, current

operating income and expenses of the amenity shall be included in current operating results.


22/41



Real estate projects commonly include amenities, such as golf courses, utility plants, clubhouses,

swimming pools, tennis courts, indoor recreational facilities, and parking facilities. Companies should

account for the costs of amenities based on management s plans for the amenities as follows:

If management plans to sell or transfer an amenity in connection with the sale of individual units

(e.g., a clubhouse that will be transferred to the homeowners association in a housing development)

the amenity is clearly associated with the development, and sale of the project and costs in excess oanticipated proceeds should be accounted for as common costs (costs that relate to two or more

units within a real estate project), and allocated to the individual units based on the relative fair valu

of each unit before construction (see Section 2.6 for additional guidance on allocating common

costs). The transfer of an amenity is equivalent to a sale for no consideration (i.e., 100 percent of

costs are common costs). Allocated costs should include expected future operating costs to be born

by the developer until the asset is sold or transferred. Any operating income realized by the

developer from the amenity prior to the amenity being sold or transferred should be recorded as a

reduction in common costs.

If management does not plan to sell or transfer an amenity in connection with the sale of individual

units (i.e., management plans to sell the amenity separately or retain the amenity), only capitalizabl

costs in excess of the estimated fair value of the amenity as of the expected date of its substantialphysical completion should be accounted for as common costs and allocated to the individual units

based on the relative fair value of each unit before construction (see Section 2.6 for additional

guidance on allocating common costs). The costs not allocated to individual units should be

capitalized as a separate asset and depreciation of the asset should commence when the amenity is

substantially complete and available for use. The costs allocated to the amenity should not be revise

after the amenity is substantially completed and available for use. A later sale of the amenity at mo

or less than its estimated fair value, less any accumulated depreciation, will result in a gain or loss

that should be included in net income in the period in which the sale occurs unless previously

impaired. Operating income (or loss) of the amenity before it is substantially complete and ready fo

its intended use should be included as a reduction of (or an addition to) common costs. After the

amenity is substantially complete and ready for its intended use, operating income (or loss) should

included in current operating results.

Illustration 2-6: Amenity to be transferred in connection with sale of individual units

Facts:

Developer As plans for a 100-unit single family home project include the construction of a recreationa

facility that will be transferred to the homeowners association once 50 percent of the homes are sold.

Costs of constructing the facility are estimated to be $75,000 and Developer A anticipates incurring

$10,000 in operating losses between the time the facility is substantially completed and available for

use, and when it is transferred to the homeowners association.

Analysis:

Because Developer A plans to transfer the recreational facility in connection with the sale of individual

units (i.e., to the homeowners), the $75,000 in costs incurred to construct the facility should be

accounted for as common costs (i.e., proceeds will be zero) and allocated to the individual homes

based on the relative fair value of each lot before construction (see Section 2.6 for additional guidance

on allocating common costs). Additionally, the $10,000 in operating losses incurred by Developer A

prior to transferring the property to the homeowners should be allocated to the individual homes as

common costs.


23/41



Illustration 2-7: Amenity to be sold in connection with sale of individual units

Facts:

Assume the same facts as in Example 1, except that Developer A plans to sell the recreational facility

to the homeowners association for $30,000.

Analysis:

Because Developer A plans to sell the recreational facility in connection with the sale of individual

units, the $55,000 in costs that are in excess of anticipated proceeds from the sale ($75,000 costs +

$10,000 in operating losses prior to sale $30,000 sales price) should be accounted for as common

costs and allocated to the individual homes based on the relative fair value of each lot before

construction (see Section 2.6 for additional guidance on allocating common costs).

Illustration 2-8: Amenity to be sold to a third party

Facts:

Assume the same facts as in Example 1, except that Developer A plans to sell the recreational facility

to a third party that will operate the facility for a profit. The estimated fair value of the facility as of the

expected date of its substantial physical completion is $80,000.

Analysis:

Because Developer A plans to sell the recreational facility separately from the sale of individual units

and the estimated fair value of the property as of the expected date of its substantial physical

completion is more than the estimated construction costs (estimated fair value $80,000 versus

$75,000 in estimated construction costs), none of the construction costs should be allocated to the

individual units. The $75,000 in construction costs should be recorded as a fixed asset and

depreciation should commence once the facility is substantially complete and available for use. Whenthe facility is sold, Developer A should record the difference between the sales price and the book

value of the asset, if any, as a gain or loss in the period of sale and not as a common cost to be

allocated to the individual homes. Additionally, the $10,000 in operating losses incurred by Developer

A after the property is substantially complete and available for use should not be allocated to the

individual homes as common costs, but should be included in current operating results. See ASC 970-

340-25-11 for a discussion of operating income or loss of amenities generated prior to the amenities

being substantially completed and available for use.

2.5 Incidental operations

Excerpt from Accounting Standards CodificationIncidental Operations

Revenue-producing activities engaged in during the holding or development period to reduce the cost

of developing the property for its intended use, as distinguished from activities designed to generate a

profit or a return from the use of the property.

Incremental Revenues from Incidental Operations

Revenues that would not be produced except in relation to the conduct of incidental operations.


24/41



Incremental Costs of Incidental Operations

Costs that would not be incurred except in relation to the conduct of incidental operations. Interest,

taxes, insurance, security, and similar costs that would be incurred during the development of a real

estate project regardless of whether incidental operations were conducted are not incremental costs.


Recognition

970-340-25-12

Incremental revenue from incidental operations in excess of incremental costs of incidental operation

shall be accounted for as a reduction of capitalized project costs. Incremental costs in excess of

incremental revenue shall be charged to expense as incurred, because the incidental operations did

not achieve the objective of reducing the costs of developing the property for its intended use.

Incidental operations are defined as revenue-producing activities engaged in during the holding or

development period to reduce the cost of developing the property for its intended use, as distinguished

from activities designed to generate a profit or a return from the use of the property. Incidental

operations do not include revenue generated from amenities because amenities are improvements thatare developed to increase the value of the project and not reduce the cost of developing the project. The

accounting for amenities is described in Section 2.4. Incremental revenue from incidental operations in

excess of incremental costs should be accounted for as a reduction of capitalized project costs. If

incremental costs exceed incremental revenue, the difference should be charged to expense, and not

treated as an increase in capitalized project costs, because the incidental operations did not achieve the

objective of reducing the costs of developing the property.

Incremental costs of incidental operations are costs that would not be incurred except in relation to the

conduct of incidental operations. Therefore, incremental costs do not include interest, taxes, insurance,

security, and other costs that would be incurred during development regardless of whether incidental

operations are conducted.

Illustration 2-9: Incidental operations

Facts:

Developer A is constructing an office building on undeveloped land. To offset the cost of development

Developer A decides to sell the lumber that is cleared from the land for $50,000. Developer A incurs

$20,000 in costs to clear the land and $10,000 to identify a buyer and ship the lumber.

Analysis:

Developer A should account for the proceeds from the sale of the lumber in excess of incremental

costs as a reduction of capitalized project costs. Because the costs incurred to clear the land would be

incurred regardless of whether the lumber was sold or discarded, the $20,000 in costs to clear theland would not be considered incremental costs. Therefore, the $50,000 proceeds from the sale less

the $10,000 in incremental costs incurred to identify a buyer and ship the lumber, or $40,000, should

be recorded as a reduction of capitalized project costs. This example presumes the costs to dispose of

the timber, were the land simply cleared, which are not incremental costs, are not significant. Because

clearing the land to build an office building is clearly associated with the development of a real estate

project, the $20,000 in costs incurred to clear the land should be capitalized as a project cost.


25/41



2.6 Allocation of capitalized costs to the components of a real estate project

Excerpt from Accounting Standards CodificationRelative Fair Value Before Construction

The fair value of each land parcel in a real estate project in relation to the fair value of the other

parcels in the project, exclusive of value added by on-site development and construction activities.

Real Estate General Property, Plant, and Equipment

Initial Measurement

970-360-30-1

The capitalized costs of real estate projects shall be assigned to individual components of the project

based on specific identification. If specific identification is not practicable, capitalized costs shall be

allocated as follows:

a. Land cost and all other common costs, including the costs of amenities to be allocated as common

costs per paragraphs 970-340-25-9 through 25-11(before construction), shall be allocated to

each land parcel benefited. Allocation shall be based on the relative fair value before construction

b. Construction costs shall be allocated to individual units in the phase on the basis of relative sales

value of each unit.

If allocation based on relative value also is impracticable, capitalized costs shall be allocated based on

area methods (for example, square footage) or other value methods as appropriate under the

circumstances.

Because components of a real estate project are often sold separately (e.g., the sale of individual home

in a housing development), costs capitalized for preacquisition costs, property taxes, insurance and

amenities must be allocated to the individual components of a real estate project. If capitalized costs of

project are specifically related to an individual component of the project (e.g., the cost of constructing a

individual home), the costs should be assigned to that component. If specific identification is not

practicable, capitalized costs should be allocated as follows:

Land cost and all other common costs incurred prior to construction should be allocated to each lan

parcel benefited based on the relative fair value of the parcel before construction. Common costs

may include the cost of amenities (see Section 2.4) and infrastructure, such as sewer and water

lines, drainage systems, roads, and sidewalks. If it is possible to specifically identify these costs with

a smaller component of the project rather than the entire project (e.g., one street within a housing

development versus the main entry to a master planned community), costs should first be allocated

to the smaller component, and then allocated to individual units based on the relative fair value

before construction.

A land parcel may be considered to be an individual lot or unit, an amenity, or aphase.The fair valu

of a parcel is affected by its physical characteristics, its highest and best use, and the time and cost

required for the buyer to make such use of the property considering access, development plans,zoning restrictions, and market absorption factors (ASC 970-340-25-10 see Section 2.4).

Construction costs should be allocated to individual units in a phase based on the relative sales valu

of each unit. Because all units may not be ready for sale at the same time, it may be necessary to

estimate the sales value of the unfinished units to properly allocate capitalized costs to all units.

If allocation based on specific identification and relative value is impracticable, capitalized costs sha

be allocated based on area methods, such as acreage or square footage, or other value methods as

appropriate under the circumstances.
http://asc.fasb.org/glossarysection&trid=2156237&id=SL2281308-110302http://asc.fasb.org/glossarysection&trid=2156237&id=SL2281308-110302http://asc.fasb.org/glossarysection&trid=2156237&id=SL2281308-110302http://asc.fasb.org/glossarysection&trid=2156237&id=SL2281308-110302


26/41



The guidance for real estate project costs indicates that land and all other common costs incurred prior

to construction, including the cost of amenities, should be allocated to each land parcelbenefited based

on the relative fair value before construction. However, it is unclear how this guidance should be applied

to the construction of condominium units or other structures that include more than one unit on the

same land parcel. It is often impracticable to allocate costs to these units based on their relative fair

value before construction, because the units do not exist before construction. Therefore, because the

guidance for real estate project costs indicates that area methods or other value methods should be use

if allocation based on relative value is impracticable, we believe it would generally be appropriate to

allocate land and common costs to these types of structures based on the relative sales value of each

unit after construction. Whenever possible, costs should be allocated so that there is a consistent profit

margin on the sale of individual units.

Illustration 2-10: Allocation of costs to project components

Facts:

Company A purchases land zoned for residential use for $320,000. Company As plans for the land

include 50 single-family homes and a swimming pool that will be transferred to the homeowners

association once 50 percent of the homes are sold. Company A estimates that it will incur $10,000 incosts to build the swimming pool and $90,000 in other common costs not directly associated with

individual homes for sewer lines, roads, and sidewalks. Company A determined the fair value

(considering the criteria in ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures) of30 of the 50 half

acre lots is $10,000 per lot ($300,000 in total) and the fair value of 20 of the 50 half acre lots is

$20,000 per lot ($400,000 in total).

Analysis:

Company A should allocate the common costs ($100,000) and land cost ($320,000) based on the

relative fair value of each parcel of land before construction. Each lot valued at $10,000 should be

allocated $6,000 in costs ($10,000 individual value/$700,000 total value X $420,000 total costs)

and each lot valued at $20,000 should be allocated $12,000 in costs ($20,000 individual

value/$700,000 total value X $420,000 total costs).

As noted above, whenever possible, costs should be allocated so that there is a consistent profit

margin on the sale of individual units. If the lots were sold before construction of the homes, the sale

of each lot would result in profit of $4,000 on the $10,000 lots and $8,000 on the $20,000 lots, for a

consistent profit margin of 40 percent on all lots. In contrast, if each lot instead was allocated an equa

share of the costs based on an area method (assuming all of the lots are the same size), each lot would

be allocated $8,400 in costs and the sale of the $10,000 lots would result in a 16 percent profit

margin, while the sale of the $20,000 lots would result in 58 percent margin.

Although not specifically mentioned in the guidance for real estate project costs, we believe the above

guidance primarily relates to real estate developed for sale versus real estate developed for rent.

Because individual units in a rental project are not for sale, it is not generally necessary to allocate costs

among the units. If allocation of capitalized costs is necessary (e.g., because the individual floors in an

office building will not all be available for lease at the same time see Section 3.3), an area method

should be used to allocate costs. This allocation will generally be limited to land and project costs, such a

the overall cost of the building. The cost of an amenity should be capitalized as a separate asset and

depreciation of the asset should commence when the amenity is substantially complete and available fo

use (see Section 2.4 for additional information on accounting for amenities).


27/41

Financialreportingdevelopments Bb1883 Realestateprojectcosts July2011

Documents

Transcript of Financialreportingdevelopments Bb1883 Realestateprojectcosts July2011