Financial Innovations and the Stability of the Housing Market Franklin Allen, James R. Barth, and...
-
Upload
sabrina-flowers -
Category
Documents
-
view
222 -
download
4
Transcript of Financial Innovations and the Stability of the Housing Market Franklin Allen, James R. Barth, and...
Financial Innovations and the Stability of the Housing Market
Franklin Allen, James R. Barth, and Glenn Yago
The Future of Housing Finance
NIESR/ESRC Conference
12 September 2014
2
I. Introduction
• Over the years financial innovations have had a significant effect on housing markets
• We consider the history of innovations and this interaction in a number of countries
• What went wrong and how can the system be fixed?
3
II-III. Early History in the UK and US
• John Wood and son in Bath, England: model for urban real estate development
• In the US home ownership accompanied reform and expansion of land ownership for farming
• By 1890 2/3 of all farm housing was owner occupied
4
US homeownership rate, 1900-2012 Q2
19001920
19401960
19621964
19661968
19701972
19741976
19781980
19821984
19861988
19901992
19941996
19982000
20022004
20062008
2010201
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75Percent
5
IV. Development of Modern US Housing Finance
• First Savings and Loan organized in 1831 and gradually spread around the country
• Granted tax advantages and developed separately from banking system
• In the 1930s S&Ls did not suffer runs because they did not take demand deposits but they did suffer withdrawals to maintain consumption and this caused failures
• In 1932 Federal Home Loan Bank System set up and in 1934 FSLIC
6
• After World War II the Savings and Loan Sector prospered growing from 3% of private financial assets in 1945 to 16% in 1975
• As interest rates fluctuated wildly in the late 1970s and early 1980s the Saving and Loan sector was put under severe strain
• Many failed and regulation was changed so they were able to become much more similar to commercial banks
7
V. Sources of Funding for Home Purchases and Homeownership Rates
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Other
Agency- and GSE-backed mortgage pools
Private-label backed mortgage pools
Savings institutions and credit unions
Commercial Banks
GSE-home mortgages
8
Sources of funding for home mortgages in selected countries, 2009
Australia
Canada
Japan
Austria
Denm
ark
Finla
nd
France
Ger
many
Gre
ece
Irela
ndIta
ly
Nether
lands
Portugal
Spain
Sweden UK
U.S.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Deposits Mortgage bonds, including covered bonds Residential mortgage-backed securities Institutional investors Other
Percent
9
Covered bonds in selected countries, 2010
Latvia
Poland
Slovakia
Hungary
Czech
R.
Austria
FinlandU.S.
Greec
eIta
ly
Portugal
Ireland
Nether
lands
Norway
Sweden
France
U.K
.
Germany
Denmark
Spain
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0.1 1 5 8 11 13 14 15 27 36 37 3955
94
253269 275
295
446 457
Mortgage-backed covered bonds outstanding
US$ Billions
10
U.S.
Polan
d
Luxem
bourg
Latvi
a
Nether
lands
Italy
Austria
Finla
ndU.K
.
Ger
man
y
Irela
nd
Portu
gal
Gre
ece
Hunga
ry
France
Slova
kia
Norway
Czech
Rep
ublic
Spain
Sweden
Denm
ark
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.1 0.7 1 26 8
12 13 1419 21
24 25 25 2531 32
4450
67
100
Mortgage-backed covered bonds as percent of residential loans outstanding
Percent
11
Homeownership rates in various countries around the world
Switzer
land
Japan
Argen
tina
Russia
Canada
United Sta
tes
Australia
Turkey
New Z
eala
nd
Isra
el
Brazil
South K
orea
Norway
South A
frica
India
China*
Icela
nd
Mex
ico
Singapore
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
38
61 6264
66 67 67 68 6871
74 75 77 7782 82 83 84
89
Selected countries, 2009
Percent
12
Germany
Denmark
Nether
lands
Austria
France
Finla
nd
Sweden
UK
USA
Poland
Luxembourg
Cyprus
Irela
nd
Portugal
Czech
Rep
ublic
Icela
nd
Belgiu
m
Malta
Italy
Greec
e
Russia
Turkey
Sloven
ia
Spain
Norway
Slovakia
Bulgaria
Latvia
Estonia
Lithuania
Hungary
Romania
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
43
5456
58 58 59
66 66 67 69 7074 75 75
77 77 78 79 80 80 81 81 8185 85 86 87 87 87
9193
98
European Union and other selected countries, 2010
Percent
13
Home mortgage debt to GDP in various countries around the world
Saudi Arabia
Argentina
Indonesia
Russia
Brazil
TurkeyIndia
MexicoChina
Korea, South
South Africa
Japan
Singapore
Australia
Norway
New Zealand
United States
Switzerla
nd
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
1 1.7 2.1 2.1 3 5 7 1015
21 22
36
60 62
71
7881
130
Selected countries, 2009Percent
14
Romania
Bulgaria
Czech
Rep
ublic
Sloven
ia
Slovakia
Poland
Lithuania
Italy
Hungary
Austria
Greec
e
Latvia
France
Estonia
Finla
nd
Malta
Luxemourg
Belgiu
m
Germany
Spain
Portugal
Cyprus
Sweden
U.K.
Irela
nd
Denmark
Nether
lands
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
612 13 14 17 19 22 23 25 28
35 3641 42 42 44 45 46 47
64 66 69
8285 87
101107
European Union countries, 2010Percent
15
VI. Federal Government Involvement in Mortgage Markets
• Since the 1930s the federal government has played an increasingly important role in the allocation of mortgage credit
• Loan insurance and guarantees: Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Ginnie Mae
• US is one of relatively few countries in which the government provides support to residential mortgage markets
16
Government support for mortgage marketsCountry Government mortgage insurance Government security guarantees Government sponsored enterprises
Denmark No No No
Germany No No No
Ireland No No No
Netherlands NHG No No
Spain No No No
United Kingdom No No No
Australia No No No
Canada Canada Mortgage Housing Corporation Canada Mortgage Housing Corporation No
Japan No Japan Housing Finance Agency Possible
South Korea No No Korean Housing Finance Corporation
Switzerland No No No
United States FHA GNMA Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, FHLBs
17
Total mortgages outstanding as percentage of US GDP
19001903
19061909
19121915
19181921
19241927
19301933
19361939
19421945
19481951
19541957
19601963
19661969
19721975
19781981
19841987
19901993
19961999
20022005
20082011
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Percent
18
Total home mortgages outstanding and share of home financing provided by government-sponsored enterprises in the
US
19601963
19661969
19721975
19781981
19841987
19901993
19961999
20022005
20082011
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
US$ trillions Percent
GSE share of home financ-ing
(Right axis)
Total home mortgages out-standing
(Left axis)
19
Date of first mortgage-backed securitization
Year Country
1970 United States
1984 Australia and Canada
1985 United Kingdom
1988 France
1989 South Africa
1991 Spain
1995 Germany and Ireland
1996 Argentina
1999 Brazil, Japan, Italy and South Korea
2000 India
2003 Mexico
2004 Malaysia
2005 China
2006 Russia and Saudi Arabia
20
Percentage of bank assetsin residential real estate loans (2010)
AngolaIndia
LesothoVirgin Islands, British
JamaicaSri Lanka
GhanaVanuatu
SwazilandMalawi
ThailandZimbabwe
BelizeSlovakia
ArgentinaGuernsey
JerseyPhilippines
Palestinian TerritoryPakistan
RussiaBrazil
MauritiusIndonesia
Puerto RicoUgandaBurundi
GuatemalaNigeria
NepalMalta
ArmeniaChina
TurkeySingaporeBotswanaUruguay
MexicoTrinidad and Tobago
KazakhstanGibraltarEcuador
Dominican RepublicSlovenia
Bosnia and Herzegov-ina
PeruPanamaFrance
Isle of ManHong Kong, China
SerbiaAustria
GuyanaSeychelles
IcelandMacao, China
BulgariaCyprus
Cayman IslandsItaly
BelarusHondurasHungary
CroatiaVenezuelaNicaragua
FijiKorea, Rep.
BelgiumTaiwan
United KingdomGreece
Sierra LeoneMalaysia
El SalvadorFinland
United StatesCanada
ChileCosta Rica
LatviaTonga
SwitzerlandPortugal
PolandLithuania
Samoa (Western) Israel
South AfricaNorway
NetherlandsNamibiaEstonia
AustraliaNew Zealand
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50%
21
Percentage of securitized residential real estate loans (2010)
Angola
Armenia
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Burundi
Cook Is lands
Cos ta Rica
Croatia
Cyprus
Dominican Republic
El Salvador
Guyana
Honduras
Hungary
India
Indones ia
Is le of Man
Is rael
Jamaica
Jersey
Kenya
Lesotho
Lithuania
Malta
Mauritius
Namibia
Pales tinian Territory
Peru
Samoa (Western)
Sierra Leone
Singapore
Slovenia
South Africa
Swaziland
Syria
Uruguay
Vanuatu
Virgin Is lands , British
Zimbabwe
New Zealand
Malays ia
Iceland
Brazil
Aus tralia
Mexico
Greece
United States
Canada
Italy
Colombia
Belgium
Netherlands
Guatemala
Puerto Rico
Seychelles
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
22
VII. Turmoil in global housing markets: Implications for the future of housing finance
• The residential mortgage market in the United States has worked extremely well over the past two centuries, enabling millions to achieve the dream of homeownership.
• But there have been periods of turmoil– The Great Depression– The late 1970s and early 1980s– The current period
23
Home prices peak in 2006 and subsequently decline(1991 Q1 – 2012 Q2; Index, 1991 Q1=100)
1991
1991
1992
1993
1994
1994
1995
1996
1997
1997
1998
1999
2000
2000
2001
2002
2003
2003
2004
2005
2006
2006
2007
2008
2009
2009
2010
2011
2012
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
S&P/Case-Schiller Home-Price Index10-Metro-Composite
OFHEO/FHFA Seasonally Adjusted Pur-chase-Only Index
24
Housing Problems in a Number of CountriesAverage house price changes
(Rankings of countries in parentheses)
Country Boom (1998:Q1-2006-Q2) Bust (2006:Q2-2011:Q3) Overall (1998:Q1-2011:Q3) Similar to the United States?
United States 49.9 (15) -22.6 (2) 16.0 (16) -
Australia 78.5 (7) 17.7 (17) 110.1 (3) No
Belgium 55.2 (11) 12.4 (14) 74.4 (7) No
Canada 53.3 (13) 28.5 (19) 96.9 (4) No
Denmark 79.5 (6) -19.5 (4) 44.6 (13) Yes
Finland 68.4 (8) 2.7 (11) 72.9 (8) No
France 102.2 (4) 5.1 (12) 112.6 (2) No
Germany -11.4 (18) -5.7 (9) -16.5 (18) No
Ireland 131.4 (1) -25.3 (1) 72.9 (9) Yes
Italy 53.4 (12) -7.9 (6) 41.2 (14) Yes
Japan -25.6 (19) -8.3 (5) -31.8 (19) No
Netherlands 61.0 (10) -6.9 (8) 49.8 (12) Yes
New Zealand 64.2 (9) -1.7 (10) 61.4 (11) Yes
Norway 53.0 (14) 24.3 (18) 90.2 (6) No
South Korea 4.4 (17) 6.5 (13) 11.1 (17) No
Spain 108.6 (3) -20.8 (3) 65.3 (10) Yes
Sweden 83.4 (5) 16.0 (16) 112.9 (1) No
Switzerland 10.7 (16) 14.2 (15) 26.4 (15) No
United Kingdom 112.2 (2) -7.3 (7) 96.6 (5) Yes
25
VIII. Future Innovations in Housing Finance
• Diversifying sources of capital (debt and equity)
• Structuring financial products that will promote private capital investment to support residential real estate construction, maintenance, and sustainable improvement
• Diversifying types of housing products (single/multiple family)
26
• Higher density, sustainable buildings that increase housing consumers’ cash flow and ability to service long-term debt
• Pooling savings and risk-management products
• Credit enhancement
• Using information technology to monitor and improve efficiency in housing finance
27
Financing Housing: Back to the Future
• Aligning interests of private capital funders with policy incentives
• Create a diversified housing stock by eliminating the bias against subsidies for renters
• Pooling savings to create investment vehicles
• Using credit enhancement and guarantees to manage real estate risks
28
• Creating flexible capital structures for residential developments through structured finance
• Regulating land use to limit supply constraints.
• Restoring the role of private investors (domestic and international) as drivers of homeownership and financing.
• Restoring confidence in securitization through mortgage-backed securities and covered bonds.