Financial Analysis (Comparative Analysis Of Coca-Cola And Pepsi)

download Financial Analysis (Comparative Analysis Of Coca-Cola And Pepsi)

of 41

Transcript of Financial Analysis (Comparative Analysis Of Coca-Cola And Pepsi)

  • 7/22/2019 Financial Analysis (Comparative Analysis Of Coca-Cola And Pepsi)

    1/41

  • 7/22/2019 Financial Analysis (Comparative Analysis Of Coca-Cola And Pepsi)

    2/41

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

    The world of Professional industry was completely far away from me, but I got an

    opportunity to know about an organizations various working aspects at WAVE

    BEVERAGES, COCA COLA Pvt. Ltd. I am indebted to my teachers and gurus who

    molded at this junction of my career from where I could take off better in the

    competitive scenario of todays world.

    First of all, I would like to thank ALMIGHTY for his gracious blessing without

    whom I would not be able to complete my project work. I would like to thank Ms.

    VANIKA (Charted Accountant) WAVE BEVERAGES, COCA COLA Pvt. Ltd, Amritsar

    for giving me an opportunity to do my summer training in this esteemedorganization.

    I have taken efforts in this project. However, it would not have been possible

    without the kind support and help ofMR. ASHISH ARORA. I would like to extend

    my sincere thanks to them. I would like to express my gratitude towards my

    parents & member of our college for their kind co-operation and encouragement

    which helped me in completion of this project.

    Neetika Sharma

    MBA (TYC) 3RD Sem.

    Page | 1

  • 7/22/2019 Financial Analysis (Comparative Analysis Of Coca-Cola And Pepsi)

    3/41

    TABLE OF CONTENTS

    S. NO. PARTICULARS PAGE NO.

    1. Beverage Industry - Overview 3

    2. SWOT Analysis of Coca Cola 4

    3. Company Profile

    3.1 About Coca Cola Company

    3.2 Vision of the Company

    5-6

    4. Introduction to the Concept

    4.1 Ratio Analysis

    4.2 Importance of Ratio Analysis

    7-8

    5. Classification of Ratios 9-24

    6. Research Methodology

    6.1 Objective of the study

    6.2 Need for the study6.3 Research Design

    6.4 Sources of data collection

    6.5 Limitations

    25-27

    7. Data Analysis & Observation 28-38

    8. Suggestions & Conclusions 39

    9. Bibliography 40

    Page | 2

  • 7/22/2019 Financial Analysis (Comparative Analysis Of Coca-Cola And Pepsi)

    4/41

    BEVERAGE INDUSTRY- OVERVIEW

    The beverage industry refers to the industry that produces drinks. Beverage

    production can vary greatly depending on which beverage is being made. Thewebsite ManufacturingDrinks.com explains that, "bottling facilities differ in the

    types of bottling lines they operate and the types of products they can run".

    Other bits of required information include the knowledge of if said beverage is

    canned or bottled, hot-fill or cold-fill, and natural or conventional. Innovations in

    the beverage industry, catalyzed by requests for non-alcoholic beverages, include

    beverage plants, beverage processing, and beverage packing.

    The beverage industry is a major driver of economic growth. A National Council

    of Applied Economic Research (NCAER) study on the carbonated soft-drink

    industry indicates that this industry has an output multiplier effect of 2.1.

    This means that if one unit of output of beverage is increased, the direct and

    indirect effect on the economy will be twice of that. In terms of employment, theNCAER study notes that "an extra production of 1000 cases generates an extra

    employment of 410 man days."

    Page | 3

  • 7/22/2019 Financial Analysis (Comparative Analysis Of Coca-Cola And Pepsi)

    5/41

    SWOT ANALYSIS OF COCA COLA

    Strengths Weaknesses

    1. The best global brand in the world in

    terms of value ($77,839 billion)

    1. Significant focus on carbonated drinks

    2. Worlds largest market share in

    beverage

    2. Undiversified product portfolio

    3. Strong marketing and advertising 3. High debt level due to acquisitions

    4. Most extensive beverage distribution

    channel

    4. Negative publicity

    5. Corporate social responsibility

    Opportunities Threats

    1. Bottled water consumption growth 1. Changes in consumer preferences

    2. Increasing demand for healthy food

    and beverage

    2. Water scarcity

    3. Growing beverages consumption in

    emerging markets (especially BRIC)

    3. Strong dollar

    4. Growth through acquisitions 4. Legal requirements to disclose

    negative information on product labels

    Page | 4

  • 7/22/2019 Financial Analysis (Comparative Analysis Of Coca-Cola And Pepsi)

    6/41

    COMPANY PROFILE

    WAVE BEVERAGES --- COCA COLA

    In India, the Coca-Cola system comprises of a wholly owned subsidiary of The

    Coca-Cola Company namely Coca-Cola India Pvt Ltd which manufactures and sells

    concentrate and beverage bases and powdered beverage mixes, a Company-

    owned bottling entity, namely, Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages Pvt Ltd; thirteen

    authorized bottling partners of The Coca-Cola Company, who are authorized to

    prepare, package, sell and distribute beverages under certain specified

    trademarks of the Coca-Cola Company; and an extensive distribution system

    comprising of our customers, distributors and retailers.

    These authorized bottlers independently develop local markets and distribute

    beverages to grocers, small retailers, supermarkets, restaurants and numerous

    other businesses. In turn, these customers make our beverages available to

    consumers across India.

    The Coca-Cola Company's brands in India include Coca-Cola, Fanta Orange,

    Limca, Sprite, Thumps Up, Burn, Kinley, Maaza, Minute Maid Pulpy Orange,

    Minute Maid Nimbu Fresh and the Georgia Gold range of teas and coffees and

    Vitingo (a beverage fortified with micro-nutrients).

    VISION OF THE COMPANYThe vision of the company serves as the framework for Road map and guides

    every aspect of the business by describing what we need to accomplish in order

    to continue achieving sustainable, quality growth.

    People: Be a great place to work where people are inspired to be the bestthey can be.

    Portfolio:Bring to the world a portfolio of quality beverage brands thatanticipate and satisfy peoples desires and needs.

    Partners: Nurture a winning network of customers and suppliers, togetherwe create mutual, enduring value.

    Planet:Be a responsible citizen that makes a difference by helping buildand support sustainable communities

    Page | 5

  • 7/22/2019 Financial Analysis (Comparative Analysis Of Coca-Cola And Pepsi)

    7/41

    Profit: Maximize long-term return to share owners while being mindful ofour overall responsibilities

    Productivity: Be a highly effective, lean and fast-moving organization.

    CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AT COCA COLA

    Coca-Cola India operations are fully integrated into the governance structure of

    The Coca-Cola Company, including two important codes:

    (a) The Code of Business Conduct outlines expectations for employees tocomply with the law and act ethically in all matters. The Code remains

    applicable to all employees of The Coca-Cola Company and its majority-

    owned subsidiaries.

    Anti-Bribery Policy: The Coca-Cola Company and its subsidiaries are committed to

    doing business with integrity. This means avoiding corruption of all kinds,

    including bribery of government officials. We will abide by all applicable anti-

    bribery laws, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, and local laws in

    every country in which it does business. The Company is a signatory to the United

    Nations Global Compact, by which it is committed to work against corruption and

    bribery around the world. The Company also has incorporated a prohibition

    against bribery into its Code of Business Conduct. This anti-bribery policy providescompliance requirements to prevent improper payments and to ensure accurate

    reporting of permissible payments under all applicable anti-bribery laws.

    (b) The Code of Business Conduct for Suppliers seeks to extend and clarify similar

    ethical expectations to our suppliers. The Supplier Code became effective in

    February 2008. Both the Code of Business Conduct and the Supplier Code

    highlight the Ethics Line reporting service, through which individuals can

    confidentially ask questions or report concerns to an independent administering

    party.

    Page | 6

  • 7/22/2019 Financial Analysis (Comparative Analysis Of Coca-Cola And Pepsi)

    8/41

    INTRODUCTION TO THE CONCEPT

    Meaning of Ratio: -A ratio is simple arithmetical expression of the relationship ofone number to another. It may be defined as the indicated quotient of two

    mathematical expressions. According to Accountants Handbook by Wixon, Kell

    and Bedford, a ratio is an expression of the quantitative relationship between

    two numbers.

    Ratio Analysis: -Ratio analysis is the process of determining and presenting therelationship of items and group of items in the statements. According to Batty J.

    Management Accounting Ratio can assist management in its basic functions of

    forecasting, planning coordination, control and communication.

    It is helpful to know about the liquidity, solvency, capital structure and

    profitability of an organization. It is helpful tool to aid in applying judgment,

    otherwise complex situations.

    Ratio analysis can represent following three methods.

    1. Pure Ratio or Simple Ratio: -It is expressed by the simple division of onenumber by another. For example, if the current assets of a business are Rs.

    200000 and its current liabilities are Rs. 100000, the ratio of Current assets to

    current liabilities will be 2:1.

    2. Rate or so Many Times: -In this type, it is calculated how many times afigure is, in comparison to another figure. For example , if a firms credit sales

    during the year are Rs. 200000 and its debtors at the end of the year are Rs.

    40000 , its Debtors Turnover Ratio is 200000/40000 = 5 times. It shows that the

    credit sales are 5 times in comparison to debtors.

    3. Percentage: -In this type, the relation between two figures is expressed inhundredth. For example, if a firms capital is Rs.1000000 and its profit is Rs.

    200000 the ratio of profit capital, in term of percentage, is 200000/1000000*100

    = 20%.

    Page | 7

  • 7/22/2019 Financial Analysis (Comparative Analysis Of Coca-Cola And Pepsi)

    9/41

    IMPORTANCE OF RATIO ANALYSIS

    Ratios are useful for the following reasons:

    1) Helpful in Forecasting: - The ratio can be used by financial managers for futurefinancial planning. Ratio calculated for a number of years work as a guide for

    the future.

    2) Useful in Co-ordination:- Ratios are useful in co-ordination, which is very muchneeded in business. The efficiency and weakness of an enterprise if

    communicated properly will establish a better co-ordination among areas of

    appreciation and control.

    3) Helpful in Control: - the most important aspect of ration analysis is that it isvery useful in controlling the areas of inefficiencies and weakness. It can be

    done by the management as a technique of correction.

    4) Helpful in Efficiency Appraisal: - ratios are the scale of comparison; here thevariations in financial statement, if they need appreciation, are brought to

    limelight.

    5) Helpful in Evaluation of Financial Position: - The ratio analysis is useful forfinancial diagnosis of an enterprise. The under mentioned ratios will make theabove clear:

    Current Ratio: - It speaks about the working capital the company is having and

    the funds to pay off its short term commitments.

    Solvency Ratio: - Profitability ratio, Capital gearing ratio are all such ratio that

    can evaluate the financial soundless or weakness of the company.

    6) Helpful to investors, Financial Institutions and Employees: - the ratios areeconomic barometer useful to the investors, financial institutions and

    employees as they can know the good and bad position of the company by

    making a comparative study of financial statement.

    Page | 8

  • 7/22/2019 Financial Analysis (Comparative Analysis Of Coca-Cola And Pepsi)

    10/41

    CLASSIFICATION OF RATIOS

    Fig: 5.1

    Ratio may be classified into the four categories as follows:

    A. Liquidity Ratio

    a. Current Ratio

    b. Quick Ratio or Acid Test Ratio

    B. Leverage or Capital Structure Ratio

    a. Debt Equity Ratio

    b. Debt to Total Fund Ratio

    c. Proprietary Ratio

    d. Fixed Assets to Proprietors Fund Ratio

    Page | 9

  • 7/22/2019 Financial Analysis (Comparative Analysis Of Coca-Cola And Pepsi)

    11/41

    e. Capital Gearing Ratio

    f. Interest Coverage Ratio

    C. Activity Ratio or Turnover Ratio

    a. Stock Turnover Ratio

    b. Debtors or Receivables Turnover Ratioc. Average Collection Period

    d. Creditors or Payables Turnover Ratio

    e. Average Payment Period

    f. Fixed Assets Turnover Ratio

    g. Working Capital Turnover Ratio

    D. Profitability Ratio or Income Ratio

    I. Profitability Ratio based on Sales

    a. Gross Profit Ratiob. Net Profit Ratio

    c. Operating Ratio

    d. Expenses Ratio

    II. Profitability Ratio Based on Investment

    I. Return on Capital EmployedII. Return on Shareholders Funds

    a. Return on Total Shareholders Funds

    b. Return on Equity Shareholders Fundsc. Earning Per Share

    d. Dividend per Share

    e. Dividend Payout Ratio

    f. Earnings and Dividend Yield

    g. Price Earning Ratio

    (A) Liquidity Ratio:-It refers to the ability of the firm to meet its current liabilities.

    The liquidity ratio, therefore, are also called Short-term Solvency Ratio. These

    ratio are used to assess the short-term financial position of the concern. Theyindicate the firms ability to meet its current obligation out of current resources.

    Liquidity ratio include two ratio:

    a. Current Ratio

    b. Quick Ratio or Acid Test Ratio

    Page | 10

  • 7/22/2019 Financial Analysis (Comparative Analysis Of Coca-Cola And Pepsi)

    12/41

    a. Current Ratio: - This ratio explains the relationship between current assets and

    current liabilities of a business.

    Current Assets: - Current assets includes those assets which can be converted

    into cash with in a years time.

    Current Liabilities: -Current liabilities include those liabilities which arerepayable in a years time.

    Significance: -According to accounting principles, a current ratio of 2:1 issupposed to be an ideal ratio. It means that current assets of a business should, at

    least, be twice of its current liabilities. The higher ratio indicates the better

    liquidity position, the firm will be able to pay its current liabilities more easily. If

    the ratio is less than 2:1, it indicate lack of liquidity and shortage of working

    capital.

    The biggest drawback of the current ratio is that it is susceptible to window

    dressing. This ratio can be improved by an equal decrease in both current assets

    and current liabilities.

    b. Quick Ratio: -Quick ratio indicates whether the firm is in a position to pay itscurrent liabilities within a month or immediately.

    Liquid Assets means those assets, which will yield cash very shortly.

    Liquid Assets = Current Assets Stock Prepaid Expenses

    Current Assets = Cash in Hand + Cash at Bank + B/R + Short Term Investment +

    Debtors (Debtors Provision) + Stock (Stock of Finished Goods + Stock of Raw

    Material + Work in Progress) + Prepaid Expenses

    Current Liabilities = Bank Overdraft + B/P + Creditors + Provision for Taxation +

    Proposed Dividend + Unclaimed Dividends + Outstanding Expenses + Loans

    Payable within a Year

    Page | 11

  • 7/22/2019 Financial Analysis (Comparative Analysis Of Coca-Cola And Pepsi)

    13/41

    Significance: - An ideal quick ratio is said to be 1:1. If it is more, it is considered to

    be better. This ratio is a better test of short-term financial position of the

    company.

    (B) Leverage or Capital Structure Ratio: -This ratio disclose the firms ability tomeet the interest costs regularly and Long term indebtedness at maturity. Theseratio include the following ratios:

    a. Debt Equity Ratio: -This ratio can be expressed in two ways:First Approach: According to this approach, this ratio expresses the relationship

    between long term debts and shareholders fund.

    Long Term Loans:-These refer to long term liabilities which mature after oneyear. These include Debentures, Mortgage Loan, Bank Loan, and Loan from

    Financial institutions and Public Deposits etc.

    Shareholders Funds: -These include Equity Share Capital, Preference ShareCapital, Share Premium, General Reserve, Capital Reserve, Other Reserve and

    Credit Balance of Profit & Loss Account.

    Second Approach: -According to this approach the ratio is calculated as follows:-

    Significance: -This Ratio is calculated to assess the ability of the firm to meet itslong term liabilities. Generally, debt equity ratio of is considered safe.

    If the debt equity ratio is more than that, it shows a rather risky financial position

    from the long-term point of view, as it indicates that more and more funds

    invested in the business are provided by long-term lenders.

    Debt Equity Ratio=External Equities/internal Equities

    Debt Equity Ratio = Long term Loans / Shareholders Funds or Net Worth

    Page | 12

  • 7/22/2019 Financial Analysis (Comparative Analysis Of Coca-Cola And Pepsi)

    14/41

    The lower this ratio, the better it is for long-term lenders because they are more

    secure in that case. Lower than 2:1 debt equity ratio provides sufficient protection

    to long-term lenders.

    b. Debt to Total Funds Ratio: - This Ratio is a variation of the debt equity ratioand gives the same indication as the debt equity ratio. In the ratio, debt is

    expressed in relation to total funds, i.e. both equity and debt.

    Significance: -Generally, debt to total funds ratio of 0.67:1 (or 67%) is consideredsatisfactory. In other words, the proportion of long term loans should not bemore than 67% of total funds.

    A higher ratio indicates a burden of payment of large amount of interest charges

    periodically and the repayment of large amount of loans at maturity. Payment of

    interest may become difficult if profit is reduced. Hence, good concerns keep the

    debt to total funds ratio below 67%. The lower ratio is better from the long term

    solvency point of view.

    c. Proprietary Ratio: -This ratio indicates the proportion of total funds provide byowners or shareholders.

    Significance: -This ratio should be 33% or more than that. In other words, theproportion of shareholders funds to total funds should be 33% or more.

    A higher proprietary ratio is generally treated an indicator of sound financialposition from long-term point of view, because it means that the firm is less

    dependent on external sources of finance. If the ratio is low it indicates that long-

    term loans are less secured and they face the risk of losing their money.

    Debt to Total Funds Ratio = Long-term Loans / Shareholders funds + Long term

    Loans

    Proprietary Ratio = Shareholders Funds/Shareholders Funds + Long term

    loans

    Page | 13

  • 7/22/2019 Financial Analysis (Comparative Analysis Of Coca-Cola And Pepsi)

    15/41

    d. Fixed Assets to Proprietors Fund Ratio: - This ratio is also known as fixed

    assets to net worth ratio.

    Significance: -The ratio indicates the extent to which proprietors (Shareholders)funds are sunk into fixed assets. Normally, the purchase of fixed assets should be

    financed by proprietors funds. If this ratio is less than 100%, it would mean that

    proprietors fund are more than fixed assets and a part of working capital is

    provided by the proprietors. This will indicate the long-term financial soundness

    of business.

    e. Capital Gearing Ratio: -This ratio establishes a relationship between equitycapital (including all reserves and undistributed profits) and fixed cost bearing

    capital.

    Whereas, Fixed Cost Bearing Capital = Preference Share Capital + Debentures +Long Term Loan

    Significance:-If the amount of fixed cost bearing capital is more than the equityshare capital (including reserves an undistributed profits), it will be called high

    capital gearing and if it is less, it will be called low capital gearing

    The high gearing will be beneficial to equity shareholders when the rate of

    interest/dividend payable on fixed cost bearing capital is lower than the rate of

    return on investment in business.

    Thus, the main objective of using fixed cost bearing capital is to maximize the

    profits available to equity shareholders.

    Fixed Asset to Proprietors Fund Ratio = Fixed Assets

    Proprietors Fund

    Capital Gearing Ratio = Equity Share Capital+ Reserves + P&L Balance / Fixed

    cost Bearing Capital

    Page | 14

  • 7/22/2019 Financial Analysis (Comparative Analysis Of Coca-Cola And Pepsi)

    16/41

    f. Interest Coverage Ratio:-This ratio is also termed as Debt Service Ratio. Thisratio is calculated as follows:

    Significance: -This ratio indicates how many times the interest charges arecovered by the profits available to pay interest charges. This ratio measures the

    margin of safety for long-term lenders.

    This higher the ratio, more secure the lenders is in respect of payment of interest

    regularly. If profit just equals interest, it is an unsafe position for the lender as

    well as for the company also, as nothing will be left for shareholders. An interestcoverage ratio of 6 or 7 times is considered appropriate.

    (C) Activity Ratio or Turnover Ratio: -These ratio are calculated on the bases ofcost of sales or sales, therefore, these ratio are also called as Turnover Ratio.

    Turnover indicates the speed or number of times the capital employed has been

    rotated in the process of doing business.

    Higher turnover ratio indicates the better use of capital or resources and in turn

    lead to higher profitability.

    a. Stock Turnover Ratio: -This ratio indicates the relationship between the costof goods during the year and average stock kept during that year.

    Here, Cost of goods sold = Net Sales Gross Profit

    Average Stock = Opening Stock + Closing Stock/2

    Significance: -This ratio indicates whether stock has been used or not. It showsthe speed with which the stock is rotated into sales or the number of times the

    stock is turned into sales during the year.

    Interest Coverage Ratio = Net Profit before charging interest and tax / Fixed

    Interest Charges

    Stock Turnover Ratio = Cost of Goods Sold / Average Stock

    Page | 15

  • 7/22/2019 Financial Analysis (Comparative Analysis Of Coca-Cola And Pepsi)

    17/41

  • 7/22/2019 Financial Analysis (Comparative Analysis Of Coca-Cola And Pepsi)

    18/41

    Average collection period can also be calculated on the bases of Debtors

    Turnover Ratio.

    Average Collection Period = 12 months or 365 days / Debtors Turnover Ratio

    Significance: -This ratio shows the time in which the customers are paying forcredit sales. A higher debt collection period is thus, an indicator of the inefficiency

    and negligence on the part of management. On the other hand, if there is

    decrease in debt collection period, it indicates prompt payment by debtors which

    reduces the chance of bad debts.

    d. Creditors Turnover Ratio: -This ratio indicates the relationship between creditpurchases and average creditors during the year.

    Significance: -This ratio indicates the speed with which the amount is being paidto creditors. The higher the ratio, the better it is, since it will indicate that the

    creditors are being paid more quickly which increases the credit worthiness of the

    firm.

    e. Average Payment Period: - This ratio indicates the period which is normally

    taken by the firm to make payment to its creditors.

    Average Payment Period = Creditors + B/P/ Credit Purchase per day

    Significance: -The lower the ratio, the better it is, because a shorter paymentperiod implies that the creditors are being paid rapidly.

    f. Fixed Assets Turnover Ratio: -This ratio reveals how efficiently the fixed assetsare being utilized.

    Creditors Turnover Ratio = Net credit Purchases / Average Creditors +

    Average B/P

    Average Payment Period = 12 months or 365 days / Creditors Turnover Ratio

    Page | 17

  • 7/22/2019 Financial Analysis (Comparative Analysis Of Coca-Cola And Pepsi)

    19/41

    Here, Net Fixed Assets = Fixed Assets Depreciation

    Significance: -This ratio is particular importance in manufacturing concernswhere the investment in fixed asset is quit high. Compared with the previous

    year, if there is increase in this ratio, it will indicate that there is better utilization

    of fixed assets. If there is a fall in this ratio, it will show that fixed assets have not

    been used as efficiently, as they had been used in the previous year.

    g. Working Capital Turnover Ratio: -This ratio reveals how efficiently workingcapital has been utilized in making sales.

    Here, Cost of Goods Sold = Opening Stock + Purchases + Carriage + Wages + Other

    Direct Expenses - Closing Stock

    Significance: -This ratio is of particular importance in non- manufacturingconcerns where current assets play a major role in generating sales. It shows the

    number of times working capital has been rotated in producing sales. A high

    working capital turnover ratio shows efficient use of working capital and quick

    turnover of current assets like stock and debtors. A low working capital turnover

    ratio indicates underutilization of working capital.

    (D) Profitability Ratio or Income Ratio: -The main object of every businessconcern is to earn profits. A business must be able to earn adequate profits inrelation to the risk and capital invested in it. The efficiency and the success of a

    business can be measured with the help of profitability ratio. Profitability ratio

    can be determined on the basis of either sales or investment into business.

    1) Profitability Ratio Based on Sales

    Fixed Assets Turnover Ratio = Cost of Goods Sold/ Net Fixed Assets

    Working Capital Turnover Ratio = Cost of Goods Sold / Working Capital

    Working Capital = Current Assets Current Liabilities

    Page | 18

  • 7/22/2019 Financial Analysis (Comparative Analysis Of Coca-Cola And Pepsi)

    20/41

    a. Gross Profit Ratio: -This ratio shows the relationship between gross profitand sales.

    Here, Net Sales = Sales Sales Return

    Significance:-This ratio measures the margin of profit available on sales. Thehigher the gross profit ratio, the better it is. No ideal standard is fixed for this

    ratio, but the gross profit ratio should be adequate enough not only to cover theoperating expenses but also to provide for depreciation, interest on loans,

    dividends and creation of reserves.

    b. Net Profit Ratio:-This ratio shows the relationship between net profit andsales. It may be calculated by two methods:

    Operating Net Profit = Operating Net Profit / Net Sales *100

    Here, Operating Net Profit = Gross Profit Operating Expenses

    Operating Expenses such as Office and Administrative Expenses, Selling and

    Distribution Expenses, Discount, Bad Debts, Interest on short term debts etc.

    Significance: -This ratio measures the rate of net profit earned on sales. It helpsin determining the overall efficiency of the business operations. An increase in the

    ratio over the previous year shows improvement in the overall efficiency and

    profitability of the business.

    Gross Profit Ratio = Gross Profit *100

    Net Sales

    Net Profit Ratio = Net Profit / Net sales *100

    Page | 19

  • 7/22/2019 Financial Analysis (Comparative Analysis Of Coca-Cola And Pepsi)

    21/41

    c. Operating Ratio:- This ratio measures the proportion of an enterprise cost ofsales and operating expenses in comparison to its sales.

    Where, Cost of Goods Sold = Opening Stock + Purchases + Carriage + Wages +

    Other Direct Expenses - Closing Stock

    Operating Expenses = Office and Administration Exp. + Selling and Distribution

    Exp. + Discount + Bad Debts + Interest on Short- term loans.

    Operating Ratio and Operating Net Profit Ratio are interrelated. Total of both

    these ratios will be 100.

    Significance:-Operating Ratio is a measurement of the efficiency and profitabilityof the business enterprise. The ratio indicates the extent of sales that is absorbed

    by the cost of goods sold and operating expenses. Lower the operating ratio is

    better, because it will leave higher margin of profit on sales.

    d. Expenses Ratio:-These ratio indicate the relationship between expenses andsales. Although the operating ratio reveals the ratio of total operatingexpenses in relation to sales but some of the expenses include in operating

    ratio may be increasing while some may be decreasing. Hence, specific

    expenses ratio are computed by dividing each type of expense with the net

    sales to analyze the causes of variation in each type of expense.

    The ratio may be calculated as :

    (a) Material Consumed Ratio = Material Consumed/Net Sales*100

    (b) Direct Labour cost Ratio = Direct labour cost / Net sales*100(c) Factory Expenses Ratio = Factory Expenses / Net Sales *100

    (a), (b) and (c) mentioned above will be jointly called cost of goods sold ratio.

    Operating Ratio = Cost of Goods Sold + Operating Expenses *100

    Net Sales

    Cost of Goods Sold Ratio = Cost of Goods Sold / Net Sales*100

    Page | 20

  • 7/22/2019 Financial Analysis (Comparative Analysis Of Coca-Cola And Pepsi)

    22/41

    (d) Office and Administrative Expenses Ratio = Office and Administrative Exp./

    Sales*100

    (e) Selling Expenses Ratio = Selling Expenses / Net Sales *100

    (f) Non- Operating Expenses Ratio = Non-Operating Exp./Net sales*100

    Significance:-Various expenses ratio when compared with the same ratios of theprevious year give a very important indication whether these expenses in relation

    to sales are increasing, decreasing or remain stationary. If the expenses ratio is

    lower, the profitability will be greater and if the expenses ratio is higher, the

    profitability will be lower.

    2) Profitability Ratio Based on Investment in the Business

    These ratio reflect the true capacity of the resources employed in the enterprise.

    Sometimes the profitability ratio based on sales are high whereas profitabilityratio based on investment are low. Since the capital is employed to earn profit,

    these ratios are the real measure of the success of the business and managerial

    efficiency.

    These ratio may be calculated into two categories:

    I. Return on Capital Employed

    II. Return on Shareholders funds

    I. Return on Capital Employed: -This ratio reflects the overall profitability of thebusiness. It is calculated by comparing the profit earned and the capital employedto earn it. This ratio is usually in percentage and is also known as Rate of Return

    or Yield on Capital.

    Return on Capital Employed = Profit before interest, tax and dividends / Capital

    Employed *100

    Where, Capital Employed = Equity Share Capital + Preference Share Capital + All

    Reserves + P&L Balance +Long-Term Loans- Fictitious Assets Non-Operating

    Assets like Investment made outside the business.

    Capital Employed = Fixed Assets + Working Capital

    Page | 21

  • 7/22/2019 Financial Analysis (Comparative Analysis Of Coca-Cola And Pepsi)

    23/41

    II. Return on Shareholders Funds:- Return on Capital Employed Shows the overall

    profitability of the funds supplied by long term lenders and shareholders taken

    together. Whereas, Return on shareholders funds measures only the profitability

    of the funds invested by shareholders. These are several measures to calculate

    the return on shareholders funds:

    a. Return on total Shareholders Funds:- For calculating this ratio Net Profitafter Interest and Tax is divided by total shareholders funds.

    Where, Total Shareholders Funds = Equity Share Capital + Preference ShareCapital + All Reserves + P&L A/c Balance Fictitious Assets

    Significance: -This ratio reveals how profitably the proprietors funds have beenutilized by the firm. A comparison of this ratio with that of similar firms will throw

    light on the relative profitability and strength of the firm.

    b. Return on Equity Shareholders Funds: - Equity Shareholders of a company are

    more interested in knowing the earning capacity of their funds in the business. As

    such, this ratio measures the profitability of the funds belonging to the equityshareholders.

    Shareholders funds are being used in the business. It is a true measure of the

    efficiency of the management since it shows what the earning capacity of the

    equity shareholders funds. If the ratio is high, it is better, because in such a caseequity shareholders may be given a higher dividend.

    c. Earnings per Share (E.P.S):-This ratio measure the profit available to the equityshareholders on a per share basis. All profit left after payment of tax and

    preference dividend are available to equity shareholders.

    Return on Equity Shareholders Funds = Net Profit (after int., tax & preference

    dividend) / Equity Shareholders Funds *100

    Return on Total Shareholders Funds = Net Profit after Interest and Tax /

    Total Shareholders Funds

    Page | 22

  • 7/22/2019 Financial Analysis (Comparative Analysis Of Coca-Cola And Pepsi)

    24/41

    Significance: -This ratio helpful in the determining of the market price of theequity share of the company. The ratio is also helpful in estimating the capacity of

    the company to declare dividends on equity shares.

    d. Dividend per share (D.P.S.):- Profits remaining after payment of tax and

    preference dividend are available to equity shareholders. But of these are not

    distributed among them as dividend .Out of these profits is retained in the

    business and the remaining is distributed among equity shareholders as dividend.D.P.S. is the dividend distributed to equity shareholders divided by the number of

    equity shares.

    e. Dividend Payout Ratio (D.P):-It measures the relationship between theearning available to equity shareholders and the dividend distributed among

    them.

    f. Earnings and Dividend Yield: -This ratio is closely related to E.P.S. and D.P.S.While the E.P.S. and D.P.S. are calculated on the basis of the book value of shares,

    this ratio is calculated on the basis of the market value of share.

    D.P.S. = Dividend paid to Equity Shareholders *100

    No. of Equity Shares

    D.P. = D.P.S. / E.P.S. *100

    Earnings per Share = Net Profit Dividend on Preference Shares

    No. of Equity Shares

    Page | 23

  • 7/22/2019 Financial Analysis (Comparative Analysis Of Coca-Cola And Pepsi)

    25/41

    g. Price Earning (P.E.) Ratio: - Price earnings ratio is the ratio between market

    price per equity share & earnings per share. The ratio is calculated to make an

    estimate of appreciation in the value of a share of a company & is widely used by

    investors to decide whether or not to buy shares in a particular company.

    Significance: -This ratio shows how much is to be invested in the market in thiscompanys shares to get each rupee of earning on its shares. This ratio is used to

    measure whether the market price of a share is high or low.

    Fig: 5.2

    Page | 24

  • 7/22/2019 Financial Analysis (Comparative Analysis Of Coca-Cola And Pepsi)

    26/41

    RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

    Research Methodology is a way to systematically solve the problems. It may be

    understood to study how research is done scientifically. In this, we study varioussteps that are generally adopted by the researcher in studying research problems

    along with the logic behind them, to understand why we are using particular

    method or technique so that the research results are capable of being evaluated.

    During my project, I have used a lot of data to understand concept of Ratio

    analysis. The data collected was interpreted and then used as information in

    project.

    OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

    To identify the comparative financial strengths of Pepsi and Coca Cola IndiaLtd.

    Through the Net Profit Ratio and other profitability ratio, understand thefinancial position of the company.

    To know the liquidity position of the company, with the help of Current ratio. To find out the utility of financial ratio in credit analysis and determining the

    financial capability of the firm.

    NEED FOR THE STUDY

    In the present scenario the competition between the soft drinks increased very

    high. The companies are struggling a lot to keep up their market share in the

    industry and to improve the sales of their products i.e. the turnover of the

    company. For this the company has to know their position in the market and the

    opinion and the loyalty of the customers and the retailers when compared to

    their competitor. Because of this reason the comparative analysis is very

    important and useful to the Company.

    By the use of comparative analysis the companies can understand the position of

    the company and the strength of the company in the market. Through the

    comparative analysis we can understand that what strategies the competitors are

    using for the increase their sales volume. From the study we can gather the

    information regarding the opinion of the retailers on the companies

    Page | 25

  • 7/22/2019 Financial Analysis (Comparative Analysis Of Coca-Cola And Pepsi)

    27/41

    comparatively and this will help to plans for the future to increase the

    performance of the company and to gain the loyalty of the retailers when

    compared to the competitors.

    RESEARCH DESIGN

    Research design is used to describe the state of affairs, as it exists at present. The

    research design adopted for this study is exploratory research design. Descriptive

    research includes fact finding enquiries of different kinds.

    SAMPLING METHOD

    This refers to the technique or procedure the research would adopt in selectingthe sample. Convenience sampling method will be chosen to conduct the survey.

    SOURCES OF DATACOLLECTION

    Data for this project is collected through Secondary sources. Secondary data is

    collected with the help of following

    1. Annual reportMajority of information gathered from data exhibited in the annual reports

    of the company. These include annual reports of the year 2009 to 2012.

    2. Reference BooksTheory relating to the subject matter and various concepts taken from

    various financial reference books.

    The study contains secondary data i.e. data from books, authenticated websites

    and journals for the latest updates just to gain an insight for the views of variousexperts.

    Page | 26

  • 7/22/2019 Financial Analysis (Comparative Analysis Of Coca-Cola And Pepsi)

    28/41

    LIMITATIONS

    Though the every researcher tries his / her best to fulfill the objectives of his / her

    study but still there are some limitations.

    The authority and genuinely of the data received cannot be tested as everycompany does not disclose all of its records on interest.

    False resultAccounting ratio is based on data drawn from accounting records. In this case if

    data is correct, then only the ratio will be correct. The data therefore must be

    absolutely correct.

    Effect of price level changesPrice level changes often make the comparison of figures difficult over a period oftime. Changes in price effect the cost of production, sales and also the value of

    the assets.

    The comparison is rendered difficult because of differences in situations of onecompany as compared to another.

    Ratios are tool of quantitative analysis only. Normally qualitative factors areneeded to draw conclusions.

    Ratio analysis is only the beginning as it gives only a little information for thepurpose of decision making.

    Page | 27

  • 7/22/2019 Financial Analysis (Comparative Analysis Of Coca-Cola And Pepsi)

    29/41

    DATA ANALYSIS & OBSERVATION

    COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF COCA-COLA AND PEPSI PVT. LTD.

    LIQUIDITY RATIOS

    1)CURRENT RATIO

    Coca Cola, Co.

    Years 2012 2011 2010 2009

    Current Assets $6,620,000,000 $6,480,000,000 $6,280,000,000 $6,000,000,000

    Current

    Liabilities

    $9,321,000,000 $9,623,000,000 $9,221,000,000 $9,121,000,000

    Current

    Ratio

    Pepsi, Co.

    Years 2012 2011 2010 2009

    Current Assets $6,220,000,000 $6,000,000,000 $6,180,000,000 $6,220,000,000

    Current

    Liabilities

    $9,000,000,000 $9,323,000,000 $9,211,000,000 $9,112,000,000

    Current

    Ratio

    0.71 0.67 0.68 0.65

    0.69 0.64 0.67 0.68

    Current Ratio= Current Assets

    Current Liabilities

    Page | 28

  • 7/22/2019 Financial Analysis (Comparative Analysis Of Coca-Cola And Pepsi)

    30/41

    0.6

    0.62

    0.64

    0.66

    0.68

    0.7

    0.72

    2012 2011 2010 2009

    COCA COLA PEPSI

    INTERPRETATION

    The above chart shows that in Pepsi, Current ratio is decreasing in year 2010 as

    compared to year 2009. In year 2011 also the Current ratio is decreasing as

    compared to year 2010. In 2012 only the Current ratio is increased. This is due to

    increase in current assets in year 2012 as compared to year 2011. In coca cola

    India Ltd, current ratio is higher than Pepsi in 2012 due to the more current assets

    than Pepsi.

    2)QUICK RATIO

    Quick Ratio= Current Assets- Investment

    Current Liabilities

    Page | 29

  • 7/22/2019 Financial Analysis (Comparative Analysis Of Coca-Cola And Pepsi)

    31/41

    Coca Cola, Co.

    Years 2012 2011 2010 2009

    Current Assets $6,620,000,000 $6,000,000,000 $6,180,000,000 $6,220,000,000

    Investments $1,066,000,000 $1,076,000,000 $1,043,000,000 $1,055,000,000

    Current

    Liabilities

    $9,000,000,000 $9,323,000,000 $9,211,000,000 $9,112,000,000

    Quick Ratio

    Pepsi, Co.

    Years 2012 2011 2010 2009

    Current Assets $6,220,000,000 $6,480,000,000 $6,280,000,000 $6,000,000,000

    Investments $1,000,000,000 $1,056,000,000 $1,043,000,000 $1,045,000,000

    Current

    Liabilities

    $9,321,000,000 $9,623,000,000 $9,221,000,000 $9,121,000,000

    Quick

    Ratio

    0.617 0.528 0.557 0.566

    0.56 0.56 0.57 0.54

    Page | 30

  • 7/22/2019 Financial Analysis (Comparative Analysis Of Coca-Cola And Pepsi)

    32/41

    0.46

    0.48

    0.5

    0.52

    0.54

    0.56

    0.58

    0.6

    0.62

    2012 2011 2010 2009

    COCA COLA PEPSI

    INTERPRETATION

    The above chart shows that in Pepsi, Quick ratio is increasing in the year 2010

    because of more current assets and investments but in year 2011 it again

    decreases. In year 2012 it remains the same as that of 2011. In coca cola India Ltd,

    quick ratio is higher than Pepsi in 2012 & 2009 due to the lesser liabilities than

    Pepsi. In year 2010 & 2011 Pepsi has higher quick ratio than coca cola due to the

    more current assets.

    Page | 31

  • 7/22/2019 Financial Analysis (Comparative Analysis Of Coca-Cola And Pepsi)

    33/41

    ACTIVITY RATIOS

    1)Account Receivable Turnover

    Coca Cola, Co.

    Years 2012 2011 2010 2009

    Net Sales $30,990 $31,944 $28,857 $24,088

    Account

    Receivable

    $3,758 $3,090 $3,317 $2,587

    Account

    Receivable

    Turnover Ratio

    Pepsi, Co.

    Years 2012 2011 2010 2009

    Net Sales $43,232 $43,251 $39,474 $35,137

    Account

    Receivable

    $4,624 $4,683 $4,389 $3,725

    Account

    Receivable

    Turnover Ratio

    8.25 10.34 8.70 9.31

    9.35 9.24 8.99 9.43

    Account Receivable Turnover = Net Sales

    Accounts Receivable

    Page | 32

  • 7/22/2019 Financial Analysis (Comparative Analysis Of Coca-Cola And Pepsi)

    34/41

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    2012 2011 2010 2009

    COCA COLA PEPSI

    INTERPRETATION

    The above chart shows that in Pepsi, account receivable turnover ratio is steadily

    increasing from the year 2009 till 2012. In case of coca cola India Ltd, account

    receivable turnover ratio is higher than Pepsi in 2010 & 2011 only. In year 2009 &

    2012 Pepsi has higher ratio than coca cola due to the more net sales.

    2)Inventory Turnover Ratio

    Coca Cola, Co.

    Years 2012 2011 2010 2009

    Cost of Goods

    Sold

    $2,545,715,000 $2,347,530,000 $2,447,890,000 $2,343,815,000

    Inventory $1,066,000,000 $1,076,000,000 $1,505,000,000 $1,080,000,000

    Inventory Turnover Ratio = Cost of Goods Sold

    Inventory

    Page | 33

  • 7/22/2019 Financial Analysis (Comparative Analysis Of Coca-Cola And Pepsi)

    35/41

    Inventory

    Turnover

    Ratio

    Pepsi, Co.

    Years 2012 2011 2010 2009

    Cost of Goods

    Sold

    $2,445,615,000 $2,237,430,000 $2,427,890,000 $2,243,810,000

    Inventory $1,066,000,000 $1,056,000,000 $1,405,000,000 $1,080,000,000

    Inventory

    Turnover

    Ratio

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    2012 2011 2010 2009

    COCA COLA PEPSI

    INTERPRETATION

    The above chart shows that in Pepsi, inventory turnover ratio is increasing in all

    the succeeding years except the year 2010. In case of coca cola India Ltd, overall

    2.38 2.18 1.62 2.17

    2.29 2.12 1.72 2.08

    Page | 34

  • 7/22/2019 Financial Analysis (Comparative Analysis Of Coca-Cola And Pepsi)

    36/41

  • 7/22/2019 Financial Analysis (Comparative Analysis Of Coca-Cola And Pepsi)

    37/41

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    2012 2011 2010 2009

    COCA COLA PEPSI

    Norm: Higher the ratio shows higher efficiency and vice versa

    INTERPRETATION

    The above chart shows that in Pepsi Gross profit ratio is decreasing in year 2010

    as compared to year 2009 but in year 2011 & 2012 gross profit ratio is gradually

    increasing this is due to increase in cost of sales and in coca cola India Pvt. Ltd,

    gross profit is increasing gradually in year 2012 as compared to previous years.

    2)NET PROFIT RATIO

    Coca Cola, Co.

    Years 2012 2011 2010 2009

    Net Profit after

    Taxes

    $151,997,100 $113,176,100 $91,857,490 $95,772,615

    Net Profit Ratio = NPAT * 100

    SALES

    Page | 36

  • 7/22/2019 Financial Analysis (Comparative Analysis Of Coca-Cola And Pepsi)

    38/41

    Net Sales $2,545,715,000 $2,347,530,000 $2,505,000,000 $2,080,000,000

    Net Profit

    Ratio

    Pepsi, Co.

    Years 2012 2011 2010 2009

    Net Profit after

    Taxes

    $110,935,315 $94,636,030 $92,937,490 $94,892,116

    Net Sales $2,000,005,000 $2,076,097,000 $2,544,000,000 $2,444,000,000

    Net ProfitRatio

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    2012 2011 2010 2009

    COCA COLA PEPSI

    Norm: Higher the ratio shows higher efficiency and vice versa

    INTERPRETATION

    The above chart shows that in Pepsi, Net profit is increasing year by year from

    2010 to 2012 like in 2010, it was 3.65 and it moves up to 5.54 in 2012 whereas in

    5.97 4.82 3.66 4.60

    5.54 4.55 3.65 3.88

    Page | 37

  • 7/22/2019 Financial Analysis (Comparative Analysis Of Coca-Cola And Pepsi)

    39/41

    coca cola India Pvt. Ltd, net profit ratio is increasing from 2010 to 2012 but the

    increase in value is more than the Pepsi.

    Return on Assets and Equity ---- comparison ofcoca cola and Pepsi with industry average

    Page | 38

  • 7/22/2019 Financial Analysis (Comparative Analysis Of Coca-Cola And Pepsi)

    40/41

    SUGGESTIONS AND CONCLUSIONS

    The in-depth analysis of key financial ratios in this project helps in measuringthe financial strength, liquidity conditions and operating efficiency of the

    company. It also provides valuable interpretation separately for each ratio

    that helps organization implementing the findings that would help the

    organization to increase its efficiency.

    Ratios are only post mortem analysis of what has happened between twobalance sheet dates. For one thing the position of the company in the interim

    period not related by analysis, moreover they gain no clue about the future.

    Ratio analysis in view of its several limitations should be considered only as a

    toll for analysis rather than as an end itself.

    From the analysis it is evident that the gross profit ratio is good, whereasoperating ratio is around optimum level to the industry standards. As a whole

    the liquidity position of the company is good.

    Thus finally the company must try to improve its profit margins as they arebelow industry levels. This improvement may also bring up its return on

    investment and overall efficiency to the company.

    The business environment of both the company is reasonably good. Thecompanys track record is always oriented towards profitable growth and with

    strong fundamentals.

    Page | 39

  • 7/22/2019 Financial Analysis (Comparative Analysis Of Coca-Cola And Pepsi)

    41/41

    BIBLIOGRAPHY

    Following books are referred for carrying out the project:-

    1. Financial management by N.M. Venchalekar2. Annual reports of Pepsi and Coca Cola

    Following websites are referred:-

    1.

    www.money.rediff.com2. www.wikipedia.com3. www.cocacolaindia.com

    http://www.money.rediff.com/http://www.money.rediff.com/http://www.wikipedia.com/http://www.wikipedia.com/http://www.cocacolaindia.com/http://www.cocacolaindia.com/http://www.cocacolaindia.com/http://www.wikipedia.com/http://www.money.rediff.com/