Financed bySupported byImplemented in cooperation with Evaluation and Monitoring.
-
Upload
dwayne-warren -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of Financed bySupported byImplemented in cooperation with Evaluation and Monitoring.
Financed by Supported by Implemented in cooperation with
Evaluation and Monitoring
Financed by Supported by Implemented in cooperation with
Controlling - Function of managementPerformance measurement systemPerformance PlanBasic Steps in a Performance AppraisalOrganizational Performance Management System -
Balanced ScorecardSelecting measurementsLinking measures to strategy Changing the Plan As Necessary During Implementation
Outline
Financed by Supported by Implemented in cooperation with
Controlling- Function of Management
• Controlling is an integral part of strategic management • It turns planned decisions and objectives into standards of
performance• Compares what was planned with what was done or achieved• Method of directing employees’ activates • Control is necessary to keep track of deviations from planned
expenditures and performance
Financed by Supported by Implemented in cooperation with
Frequent changes in the company’s environment, and issues predicting them
Attempts to avoid bigger disturbances and problems in the business
Emergence of opportunities and threats that should be addressed
It supplies management with important information necessary for corrective actions or new ideas
It can serve to motivate employees by connecting rewards and punishments with results and performance
The need for adequate allocation and use of company’s limited resources.
Reasons for control
Financed by Supported by Implemented in cooperation with
1• Determining what we are measuring
2• Defining standards of performance
3• Creating the system for measuring or monitoring
4• Comparing the achieved/ realized with planned
5• Undertaking corrective actions
The controlling process consists of:
Financed by Supported by Implemented in cooperation with
projections and expectations in relation to objectives and effort put into achieving them
Determined in terms of expected quantity, qualitytime
In accordance with internal and external circumstances and conditions
Standards of Performance
Financed by Supported by Implemented in cooperation with
Systems of measuring and monitoring must be defined before the implementation of the plan begins
The system should include sources of verification: procedures, techniques, and tools to gather and analyze data should be included in the management information system
Gathered data should be continuously analyzed to determine if projects are on the right track or have deviated
Systems of measuring
Financed by Supported by Implemented in cooperation with
Determine
• extent• character• causes
Undertake corrective actions
In case of deviation
Successfulness of the control system is determined by how measurable are the foreseen activities
Financed by Supported by Implemented in cooperation with
Validity of data
Timeliness
Cost-benefit ratio of the systems operations
Ease of use and understanding
Efficiency of exerting corrective actions
Parameters of the quality of control are:
Financed by Supported by Implemented in cooperation with
Quality management systems build responsibility of staff and managers in performing tasks and reducing the need for traditional product quality methods.
In this system is it up to everyone to pay attention to their own deviations or underperformance and react by correcting their own actions
Quality Management System
Financed by Supported by Implemented in cooperation with
Administrative v. Technical
Internal v. External
Preventative v. Corrective
Financial
Strategic v. Tactical v. Operational
Types of Control
Financed by Supported by Implemented in cooperation with
Advantages Three Basic Types of Control/Evaluation:
Ex-AnteInterimEx-Post
Timing vs. methodologies used
Monitoring and Evaluating
Monitoring and evaluating are just as important as identifying strategic
issues/ goals.
Financed by Supported by Implemented in cooperation with
The focus is on effectivenessdoing the right things the right way to get results.
The overall goal is to ensure the organization and all its subsystems are working together in an optimum fashion
Performance management brings a focus on overall results, measuring results, focused and ongoing feedback about results, and development plans to improve results
Performance Measurement System
Financed by Supported by Implemented in cooperation with
The organization
Departments
Processes
Programs
Products or services
Projects
Teams or groups
Performance management includes
Performance measurement aligns organizational activities and provides the goals of the organization
It cultivates a systems-based approach while looking at outcomes and drivers, favoring the long-term views of the organization
Financed by Supported by Implemented in cooperation with
Organizational
Process
Individual
Levels of performance
Financed by Supported by Implemented in cooperation with
1• Identification and prioritization of desired results
2• Establishing means to measure progress towards the results
3• Setting standards for assessing how well results were achieved
4• Tracking and measuring progress
5• Exchanging ongoing feedback among those participants
working to achieve results
6• Periodically reviewing progress
7• Reinforcing activities that achieve results and intervening to
improve progress where needed
Process
Financed by Supported by Implemented in cooperation with
1• Review organizational goals
2• Specify desired results
3• Ensure the desired results directly contribute to the organization’s results
4• Weigh and prioritize results
5
• Identify first level measures to evaluate if and how well the desired results were achieved
6• Identify more specific measures for each first-level measure if necessary
7• Identify standards for how well the desired results were achieved
8• Document a performance plan
9• Conduct on going observations and measurements
10
• Exchange ongoing feedback about performance
11
• Conduct a performance review
12
• If performance meets standards give rewards, if not plan to address the performance gap.
Steps for implementation of the Performance Plan
Financed by Supported by Implemented in cooperation with
Basic Steps:Conduct ongoing observations and measurements to track performanceExchange ongoing feedback about performanceConduct a performance appraisal/ review
If performance does not meet the plan then update it to address the gap, create a performance development plan.
A performance development plan clearly conveys:How the conclusion was made that there was adequate performanceWhat actions are being taken and by whomWhen performance will be reviewed again and how
Performance Appraisal
Financed by Supported by Implemented in cooperation with
Comprehensive approaches to improve organizational performance and include regular reoccurring activities to establish goals and monitor progress towards them.
Balanced Scorecard- a framework, methodology, analytical technique, and management system.
Organizational Performance Management System
Financed by Supported by Implemented in cooperation with
The balanced scorecard can be used for management and strategic control
• Regulation of operational entities or performance processes• Favor use of benchmark or comparative data• Occasionally simulation or modeling for calibrating measures• Support cross operational units comparison • Outcomes at this level are clearly defined
Management:
• Monitoring to ensure the strategic choices are the right ones• The extent to which the activities planned to achieve them have been
undertaken • Outcomes at this level are uncertain and difficult to predict
Strategic:
Financed by Supported by Implemented in cooperation with
Questions for selecting measurements:Where do I focus my performance efforts in the organization?How do I identify which organizational results to measure?How do I know what measures to make to evaluate results?What about measures after I’ve made efforts to improve performance?
In Balanced Scorecard the areas of measurement (perspective) are:Customer scorecardFinancial scorecard Internal business process scorecardKnowledge, education and growth scorecard
We define and measure implementation of strategic objectives in each of the 4 perspectives.
Selecting Measurements
Financed by Supported by Implemented in cooperation with
Customer measures identify value propositions companies will have to deliver to targeted customers and market segments.
The value propositions are the lead indicators/ performance drivers. Core customer outcome measures are generic and need to be customized to target groups.Market shareCustomer acquisitionCustomer retentionCustomer satisfaction Customer profitability
Measurements of value proposition consist of three groups: product/service attributes, customer relationships, and image/reputation
Measures of Customers’ Satisfaction and Performance Requirements
Financed by Supported by Implemented in cooperation with
Financial objectives represent the goal to provide superior returns based on the capital invested in the unit and translates to lower level objectives relating to profitability, asset returns and revenue enhancement.
The guiding concept is that the long-term goal is to generate financial returns to investors. All strategies should enable businesses to achieve this goal.
Financial Objective ThemesRevenue growth and mixCost reduction/ productivity improvement Asset utilization and investment strategyRisk Management
Financial Requirements and Performance
Financed by Supported by Implemented in cooperation with
Revenue Growth and MixSales growth rateMarket share for targeted regions, markets, and customersOther measures depend on the objective
Cost Reduction and Productivity Improvement Increased revenue productivityRevenue per employeeReduced unit costs Improved channel mixReduced operating expenses
Asset Utilization/ Investment StrategyObjective: Increase revenue and reduce costs. Measure: return-on
capital employed and investment
Measures of Financial Objectives
Financed by Supported by Implemented in cooperation with
Internal-process value chain is made up of innovation processes, operations process, and post-sale services.
Measures in terms of cost, quality, throughput, and time Innovation Processes: measured from research and product
development perspectives Operations Processes: from receipt of order to deliver;
efficiency, consistency, timely deliveries. Post-Sale services (warranty and repairs) - focus on time,
quality, and cost metrics
Measuring Internal Business Processes
Financed by Supported by Implemented in cooperation with
Measurement categoriesemployee capabilities, information systems capabilities, motivation,empowerment, and alignment
Employee capabilitiesproductivity, retention, a satisfaction index
Measuring Organizational Learning and Growth
Financed by Supported by Implemented in cooperation with
Information capabilities strategic information coverage ratio,percentage of processes with real-time quality, cycle time and cost feedback available,access to information about customers
Organizational climate for motivation and initiative suggestions made by employees compared with number
implemented,rates of improvements made, individual and organizational alignment, team performance
Financed by Supported by Implemented in cooperation with
Translating strategies into operational terms In order to promote alignment companies must create synergies among
various business units and functions by setting a consistent messageBasic steps for turning strategic deployment into a continual process
Link strategies to budgetCall on management to hold regular review of the strategies during
their meetings and reviewsDevelop a process for learning and adapting strategies
Three principles that enable measures to be linked to strategy are:The cause-and-effect relationshipOutcome and performance driversLinkages to financials
Linking Measures to Strategy